Continually Updated Clinical Reference
 
 
  All Sources     eMedicine     Medscape     Drug Reference     MEDLINE
 
eMedicine - Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy : Article by

Quick Find
Authors & Editors
Introduction
Differentials
Radiograph
MRI
Ultrasound
Nuclear Medicine
Intervention
Multimedia
References

Related Articles
[Reiter Syndrome, Musculoskeletal]

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Diagnosis

Osteoarthritis, Primary

Osteomyelitis, Acute Pyogenic

Osteomyelitis, Chronic

Rheumatoid Arthritis, Hands




Patient Education
Click here for patient education.



Author: Lawrence E Holder, MD, Clinical Professor, Department of Radiology, University of Florida, Shands Jacksonville Medical Center

Lawrence E Holder is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Nuclear Physicians, American College of Radiology, American Medical Association, Association of University Radiologists, MedChi, Radiological Society of North America, and Society of Nuclear Medicine

Editors: Leon Lenchik, MD, Director, Densitometry Minifellowship, Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, Wake Forest University Medical Center; Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand; Wilfred CG Peh, MD, MBBS, FRCP(Glasg), FRCP(Edin), FRCR, MHSM, Clinical Professor, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Singapore; Senior Consultant Radiologist, Programme Office, Singapore Health Services; Robert M Krasny, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute; Felix S Chew, MD, MBA, EdM, Professor, Department of Radiology, Vice Chairman for Radiology Informatics, Section Head of Musculoskeletal Radiology, University of Washington

Author and Editor Disclosure

Synonyms and related keywords: complex regional pain syndrome type I, CRPS-I, sympathetically mediated pain syndrome, SMPS, causalgia, algodystrophy, algodynia, Sudek's atrophy, Sudek atrophy, shoulder-hand syndrome, RSD

Background

Reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD) is an incompletely understood response of the body to an external stimulus, resulting in pain that usually is nonanatomic and disproportionate to the inciting event or expected healing response. As early as the 1930s and 1940s, a short circuit in the reflex arc between somatic afferent sensory fibers and autonomic sympathetic efferents was postulated to explain overall increased sympathetic stimulation. Currently, no specific pathologic, histologic, or biochemical markers of this condition exist.

Although controversy continues regarding the term, definition, and process of diagnosis, the presence of sympathetically maintained pain is accepted as an etiology for, or at least as a significant component of, many regional pain problems.

Pathophysiology

Symptomatically, RSD is a condition of the extremities. RSD is known and accepted best when it affects the upper extremity, predominantly in a regional distribution involving the distal forearm, wrist, and hand, and occasionally the arm and shoulder. No pathophysiologic mechanism has been established. Efferent sympathetic nervous system overactivity and/or abnormal activity involving spinal internuncial neurons, peripheral nociceptors, and/or mechanoreceptors have been postulated.

Many biomechanical factors have been considered, beginning with tissue injury as an initial inciting event, with substance P, histamine, and prostaglandins all possibly involved. Other possible etiologies include vasodilatation, shunting, and regional hypoxia associated with nociceptor stimulation, as well as the role of alpha-adrenergic receptors in maintaining and controlling thermoregulatory modulation. Segmental involvement of 1,2, or 3 rays in the hand has been reported infrequently, according to Kline and Holder, and bilateral involvement is rare to nonexistent.

In the lower extremity (most often foot and ankle), a less well-defined clinical pattern also is associated with a similar spectrum of pathophysiologic speculations. In the knee, potentially sympathetically related postoperative and posttraumatic signs and symptoms have been ascribed to RSD or other neuroregulatory processes but with less accepted clinical or diagnostic standards of reference. More recently, the term complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) has been introduced to encompass a variety of chronic pain syndromes, with RSD labeled as type I. All sympathetically maintained pain syndromes (SMPS) may not be RSD.

Frequency

United States

The incidence of RSD following trauma is difficult to estimate, since the literature is replete with studies in which clinical criteria for the diagnosis of RSD vary dramatically, with many often equating unexplained pain to RSD. For example, upper extremity RSD, as understood and treated by hand surgeons, is described differently than lower extremity RSD diagnosed by rheumatologists or hip RSD described by obstetricians. Some authors suggest that 8-10% of patients with fracture develop RSD, but in the author's experience, the frequency is much lower.

Mortality/Morbidity

Most RSD patients recover completely over time. Uncommonly, the syndrome progresses to the point of incapacitation and a "claw hand" is observed.

Sex

In the upper extremity, the author's experience demonstrates a clear female preponderance, especially in patients presenting to the orthopedic surgeon.

Age

Patients younger than 50 years predominate.

In the upper extremity, orthopedic surgeons see children only rarely. Rheumatologists, who generally use less strict criteria for diagnosis, report a slightly higher frequency of involvement in children. Similarly, pediatricians report a moderate frequency of lower extremity neurovascular or neuroregulatory disease in children that has been termed RSD. In these children, a bone scan pattern often reveals marked decreased tracer uptake on delayed images compared to increased uptake in adults; therefore, this may represent a different condition, such as pseudodystrophy.

Anatomy

RSD involving the hand, wrist, shoulder, ankle, and foot has been established, with diffuse involvement of adjacent carpals or tarsals, metacarpals or metatarsals, phalanges, and, frequently, the distal forearm or leg. Rarely, segmental involvement of 1, 2, or 3 rays of the hand is observed. Involvement of the knee, although described, is less well documented and along with focal pain conditions in the hip (often interchangeably termed RSD or transient osteoporosis) may be a different process.

Clinical Details

Radiologists and orthopedic surgeons usually agree to define RSD (as stated by Schutzer) as an "excessive or exaggerated response to an injury of an extremity, manifested by four somewhat constant characteristics: (1) intense or unduly prolonged pain, (2) vasomotor disturbances, (3) delayed functional recovery, and (4) various associated trophic changes."

The key feature is pain, which often is the initial presenting symptom. Various clinical schemas have been proposed that relate stages of disease to signs and symptoms and the time elapsed since the inciting event. One example of staging by Rosenthal and Wortmann is as follows:

  • Stage 1 has a duration of weeks to months. The limb has nonfocal pain, swelling with associated joint stiffness and decreased range of motion, and increased skin temperature.
  • Stage 2 has a duration of 3-6 months. Pain continues but decreases over time. Swelling evolves into thickening of the dermis and fascia. Early signs of atrophy and osteoporosis become evident, and the extremity becomes cooler.
  • Stage 3 is the atrophic stage. Pain continues and atrophy is exacerbated by continued decreased range of motion and increased joint stiffness. The extremity is cooler with decreased vascularity.

Preferred Examination

Radiologic examination

Radionuclide bone imaging (RNBI) is the only generally accepted imaging technique to provide objective and relatively specific evidence of RSD in the upper and lower extremities, predominantly the hands and feet. Delayed bone imaging has been reported to be up to 100% sensitive for the variant of sympathetically maintained pain termed RSD by hand and foot surgeons.

Plain radiography is only 60% sensitive and not specific; when positive, radiographs often show only osteoporosis, occasionally in combination with soft tissue swelling or diffuse soft tissue atrophy.

No consistent findings have been found in the occasional study done with other imaging modalities, and none are suggested for diagnosis.

Nonimaging diagnostic testing

Pain in response to mild cooling stimuli: A drop of acetone or ethyl chloride spray provoking severe pain suggests SMPS rather than a sympathetically independent pain syndrome (SIPS).

Phentolamine test: The blocking of alpha-adrenergic receptors by intravenous phentolamine compared to a placebo helps classify patients as SMPS versus SIPS.

Limitations of Techniques

Patients are observed who present with acute or subacute pain and vasomotor or neuroregulatory signs or symptoms and who do not demonstrate the classic diffuse increased uptake on delayed RNBI. The relationship of these patients to those with abnormal RNBI remains unexplained.



[Reiter Syndrome, Musculoskeletal]
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Diagnosis
Osteoarthritis, Primary
Osteomyelitis, Acute Pyogenic
Osteomyelitis, Chronic
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Hands

Other Problems to be Considered

Algodynia
Algodystrophy
Diffuse cellulitis
Diffuse local trauma
Neuroregulatory abnormalities
Pseudodystrophy
Phlebitis
Regional migratory osteoporosis
Scleroderma of the hands
Sudeck atrophy
Transient bone marrow edema
Transient osteoporosis
Transient osteoporosis of the hip
Transient regional osteoporosis
Vascular injuries



Findings

Osteoporosis, although found in as many as 60% of patients with upper extremity RSD, is not specific, often representing changes of disuse secondary to the pain associated with RSD. Occasionally, soft tissue swelling or diffuse soft tissue atrophy may be seen; these are nonspecific findings.



Findings

MRI changes in established RSD rarely have been evaluated, and as with studies using other modalities, the definition of RSD has varied considerably. In one study by Schweitzer et al involving the lower extremity (n = 35), soft tissue thickening with and without contrast enhancement (n=31) was demonstrated without any marrow changes, while in another study of the upper extremity (n = 17) by Koch et al, no marrow changes and only inconsistent soft tissue or muscle signal changes were seen.

In the hand, Sintzoff et al used MRI to detect what was believed to be bone marrow edema and then equated bone marrow edema to RSD. MRI thus is not an established technique in the imaging evaluation of RSD.



Findings

A single-power Doppler study by Nazarian et al involving the lower extremities suggested increased flow without side-to-side asymmetry in patients with RSD. Ultrasound thus is not an established technique in the imaging evaluation of RSD.



Findings

Three-phase RNBI is performed primarily because the differential diagnosis often includes infection or other lesions for which information about the perfusion to the extremity (phase I) or relative vascularity of the extremity (phase II) is helpful.

For regional RSD of the hand or foot, the hallmark on the radionuclide angiogram (RNA; phase I) is diffuse increased perfusion to the entire extremity, including the distal forearm or leg and, occasionally, reaching the shoulder or hip, even when the inciting lesion is distal.

Similar diffuse increased vascularity, manifested by diffuse increased tracer accumulation on blood pool or tissue-phase images (phase II) is seen. On these images, juxta-articular accentuation may be seen. RNA findings are abnormal in approximately 40% of patients and blood pool findings in approximately 50%, most often in clinical stage I or II of the disease.

Delayed images demonstrate diffuse increased tracer throughout the hand or foot, including the wrist or ankle, with juxta-articular accentuation and, often, proximal uptake involving the forearm or leg and, occasionally, the shoulder and arm or hip and femur. Activity in the hands or feet usually is more prominent proximally than distally, but the amount of abnormal tracer uptake has not been correlated with clinical severity. Quantification occasionally has been helpful but is not used routinely.

Degree of Confidence

When RNBI, especially in the upper extremity, demonstrates classic diffuse findings, RSD is certain (specificity). When RNBI does not demonstrate that pattern, the most common variant of SMPS or CRPS type 1 is excluded (sensitivity).

In the lower extremity, patients with severe infection, especially if underlying diabetes mellitus is present, may demonstrate diffuse increased delayed image tracer uptake on RNBI performed to diagnose osteomyelitis. This is not usually a diagnostic issue clinically.



Radiologic intervention is not available.



Media file 1:  Reflex sympathetic dystrophy of the hand. Delayed image palmar view reveals increased tracer diffusely involving the entire right wrist, metacarpals, and phalanges, with juxta-articular accentuation. Relatively less increased uptake is observed distally, but all areas are involved. The dot of increased activity distal to the third ray is a hot marker indicating the right side.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 2:  Reflex sympathetic dystrophy of the foot. Delayed image plantar view reveals increased tracer uptake diffusely involving the lowermost right leg, ankle, tarsals, metatarsals, and phalanges. Uptake is less distally than proximally, but all areas are involved. The dot of increased activity distal to fifth toe is a hot marker indicating the right side.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo



  • Amadio PC, Mackinnon SE, Merritt WH, et al. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome: consensus report of an ad hoc committee of the American Association for Hand Surgery on the definition of reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome. Plast Reconstr Surg. Feb 1991;87(2):371-5. [Medline].
  • Driessens M. Infrequent presentations of reflex sympathetic dystrophy and pseudodystrophy. Hand Clin. Aug 1997;13(3):413-22. [Medline].
  • Fournier RS, Holder LE. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy: diagnostic controversies. Semin Nucl Med. Jan 1998;28(1):116-23. [Medline].
  • Holder LE, Mackinnon SE. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy in the hands: clinical and scintigraphic criteria. Radiology. Aug 1984;152(2):517-22. [Medline].
  • Holder LE, Cole LA, Myerson MS. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy in the foot: clinical and scintigraphic criteria. Radiology. Aug 1992;184(2):531-5. [Medline].
  • Kline SC, Holder LE. Segmental reflex sympathetic dystrophy: clinical and scintigraphic criteria. J Hand Surg [Am]. Sep 1993;18(5):853-9. [Medline].
  • Koch E, Hofer HO, Sialer G, et al. Failure of MR imaging to detect reflex sympathetic dystrophy of the extremities. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jan 1991;156(1):113-5. [Medline].
  • Mackinnon SE, Holder LE. The use of three-phase radionuclide bone scanning in the diagnosis of reflex sympathetic dystrophy. J Hand Surg [Am]. Jul 1984;9(4):556-63. [Medline].
  • Nath RK, Mackinnon SE, Stelnicki E. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy. The controversy continues. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 1996;23(3):435-46. [Medline].
  • Nazarian LN, Schweitzer ME, Mandel S, et al. Increased soft-tissue blood flow in patients with reflex sympathetic dystrophy of the lower extremity revealed by power Doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Nov 1998;171(5):1245-50. [Medline].
  • Poncelet C, Perdu M, Levy-Weil F, et al. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy in pregnancy: nine cases and a review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. Sep 1999;86(1):55-63. [Medline].
  • Rosenthal AK, Wortmann RL. Diagnosis, pathogenesis, and management of reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome. Compr Ther. Jun 1991;17(6):46-50. [Medline].
  • Schiepers C. Clinical value of dynamic bone and vascular scintigraphy in diagnosing reflex sympathetic dystrophy of the upper extremity. Hand Clin. Aug 1997;13(3):423-9. [Medline].
  • Schutzer SF, Gossling HR. The treatment of reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Apr 1984;66(4):625-9. [Medline].
  • Schweitzer ME, Mandel S, Schwartzman RJ, et al. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy revisited: MR imaging findings before and after infusion of contrast material. Radiology. Apr 1995;195(1):211-4. [Medline].
  • Sintzoff S, Sintzoff S, Stallenberg B, Matos C. Imaging in reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Hand Clin. Aug 1997;13(3):431-42. [Medline].
  • Veldman PH, Reynen HM, Arntz IE, Goris RJ. Signs and symptoms of reflex sympathetic dystrophy: prospective study of 829 patients. Lancet. Oct 23 1993;342(8878):1012-6. [Medline].
  • Wesselmann U, Raja SN. Pain: nociceptive and neuropathic mechanisms. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy and causalgia. Anesthesiol Clin North America. 1997;15:407-27.
  • Wong GY, Wilson PR. Classification of complex regional pain syndromes. New concepts. Hand Clin. Aug 1997;13(3):319-25. [Medline].

Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy excerpt

Article Last Updated: Aug 26, 2005