Introduction
Background
Gastric carcinoma is the most common cancer in the world after lung cancer and is a major cause of mortality and morbidity. Though a marked reduction has been observed in the incidence of gastric carcinoma in North America and Western Europe in the last 50 years, 5-year survival rates are less than 20%, as most patients present late and are unsuitable for curative, radical surgery.
Pathophysiology
The accepted pathway involves transitions from gastritis, to gastric atrophy, to metaplasia, to dysplasia, and, finally, to cancer.
Several dietary and environmental factors may influence this pathway.
- Dietary nitrates: Bacteria in the stomach break down nitrites to compounds (eg, N -nitroso compounds) that are carcinogenic in animals.
- Hypochlorhydria: This condition occurs in gastric atrophy and promotes bacterial colonization of the stomach. It leads to increased nitrite formation, which may have a mutagenic effect on the atrophic gastric mucosa.
- Helicobacter pylori: Antral gastritis caused by H pylori has been linked to the development of gastric cancer. Patients with H pylori gastritis are 3-6 times more likely to develop gastric cancer than individuals without the infection.
- Certain foods: Starch, pickled vegetables, salted fish and meat, smoked foods, and salt have all been implicated in the development of gastric carcinoma.
- Cigarette smoking: Those who smoke more than 30 cigarettes per day have a 5-fold increased risk of gastric carcinoma.
Several precancerous conditions are recognized:
- Chronic atrophic gastritis (see Image 1)
- Pernicious anemia
- Previous partial gastrectomy
- Ménétrier disease
- Gastric dysplasia
- Adenomatous polyps (20% of all gastric polyps)
- Hereditary factors
Adenocarcinomas account for approximately 95% of all malignant gastric neoplasms. The remaining 5% of tumors are lymphomas, leiomyosarcomas, carcinoids, or sarcomas.
Gastric adenocarcinomas are divided into 2 types:
- An intestinal type (type 1), with well-formed glandular structures: This type is more likely to involve the distal stomach and occur in patients with atrophic gastritis. It has a strong environmental association.
- A diffuse type (type 2), with poorly cohesive cells that tend to infiltrate the gastric wall: Tumors of this type may involve any part of the stomach, especially the cardia, and have a worse prognosis than the intestinal type. Unlike type 1 gastric cancers, type 2 cancers have similar frequencies in all geographic areas.
With gastric carcinomas, advanced lesions will have already invaded the muscularis propria. They are associated with metastases to regional lymph nodes or to local or distant structures.
Early gastric lesions are confined to the mucosa or submucosa. Patients with these tumors have a 5-year survival rate of 90%. Most reports are from Japan as a result of mass screening in that country.
Before 1950, most gastric tumors detected were located in the antrum. Since then, the location has gradually shifted from the antrum to the body and fundus because of the rapidly increasing incidence of carcinoma in the gastric cardia and lower esophagus. Today, 30% of gastric lesions are found in the antrum, 30% are in the body, and 40% are in the fundus and cardia.
Frequency
United States
The incidence decreased from 33 cases per 100,000 population in 1930 to 3.7 cases per 100,000 population in 1990. In 1996, about 22,800 new cases of gastric adenocarcinoma occurred. In Western countries, the incidence of carcinoma of the cardia has increased rapidly in the last 20 years, in contrast to the decline in gastric cancer as a whole, particularly in tumors of the body and antrum.
International
Worldwide, gastric adenocarcinoma is the second most common cancer (second to lung cancer). The global incidence of gastric cancer varies 10-fold. The highest incidence (>30 cases per 100,000 population) is in Japan, Russia, China, South America, and Eastern Europe. The lowest incidence ( <3.7 cases per 100,000 population) is in North America, Western Europe, Australia, and New Zealand.
Mortality/Morbidity
- In 1996, gastric cancer caused approximately 14,000 deaths in the United States.
- Worldwide, gastric cancer is second only to lung cancer as the most common cause of cancer deaths.
- Most patients present late, and the 5-year survival rate is approximately 20%.
Race
- Overall, gastric carcinoma is 1.5-2.5 times more common in African Americans, Hispanics, and American Indians than in whites.
- Among Japanese who immigrate to the United States, the incidence gradually decreases (to 25% of their original incidence). The rate further decreases in their children, and their grandchildren have a rate comparable to that of the general population in the United States.
- The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the cardia is highest among white men.
Sex
Gastric carcinoma is 2 times more common in men than in women. Moreover, carcinoma of the cardia of the stomach is up to 7 times as common in men as in women.
Age
Gastric carcinoma has a peak incidence in those aged 50-70 years; however, approximately 5% of patients with gastric cancer are younger than 35 years, and 1% are younger than 30 years. Younger patients have more aggressive lesions with a worse prognosis.
Anatomy
The stomach consists of the cardia (adjacent to the gastroesophageal junction), the fundus, the body, the antrum, and the pylorus. The fundus is dome-shaped and extends above and to the left of the cardia, toward the left hemidiaphragm. The body extends from the fundus to the lower end of the lesser curve, known as the incisura angularis. The antrum extends from the incisura to the pyloric canal.
The stomach is lined by peritoneum. The lesser omentum and greater omentum are double layers of peritoneum that extend from the lesser curve and greater curve, respectively.
The right and left gastric, right and left gastroepiploic, and short gastric arteries supply the stomach. These arteries originate from all 3 branches of the celiac trunk. The venous drainage is into the portal vein or one of its branches. The lymphatic drainage is into the celiac lymph nodes surrounding the celiac trunk.
Presentation
Presentation
Most patients present with advanced disease because they are often asymptomatic in the earlier stages. Common presenting features include epigastric pain, bloating, early satiety, nausea, vomiting, dysphagia, anorexia, weight loss, and upper GI bleeding (hematemesis, melena, iron deficiency anemia, positive results with fecal occult blood tests).
Differential diagnosis
Because peptic ulcers and gastritis cause similar findings, diagnosis is often delayed. Jaundice and hepatomegaly may be due to hepatic metastases. Pelvic masses may be the result of ovarian metastases (Krukenberg tumors).
Prognosis and staging
The prognosis is related to the stage of the disease at the time of diagnosis and to the histologic grade of the carcinoma.
Pathologic staging is based on tumor stage, nodal stage, and metastasis stage (TMN).
- T stage - Extent of penetration through the gastric wall
- Tis - Carcinoma in situ, intraepithelial tumor
- T1 - Tumor extension to submucosa
- T2 - Tumor extension to the muscularis propria or subserosa
- T3 - Tumor penetration of the serosa
- T4 - Tumor invasion of the adjacent organs
- N stage - Number and site of draining lymph nodes involved (see also N staging in the CT Scan, Findings section, below)
- N0 - No lymph nodes involved
- N1 - Metastases in 1-6 regional lymph nodes
- N2 - Metastases in 7-15 regional lymph nodes
- N3 - Metastases in >15 regional lymph nodes
- M stage - Presence of metastases
- M0 - No distant metastases
- M1 - Distant metastases
Staging and 5-Year Survival Rates
Open table in new window
Table
| Stage | TNM Stage | 5-Year Survival |
| 1 | T1N0M0, T1N1M0, or T2N0M0 | 88% |
| 2 | T1N2M0, T2N1M0, or T3N0M0 | 65% |
| 3a | T2N2M0, T3N1M0, or T4N0M0 | 35% |
| 3b | T3N2M0 | 35% |
| 4 | T4N1-3M0, TxN3M0, or TxNxM1* | 5% |
| Stage | TNM Stage | 5-Year Survival |
| 1 | T1N0M0, T1N1M0, or T2N0M0 | 88% |
| 2 | T1N2M0, T2N1M0, or T3N0M0 | 65% |
| 3a | T2N2M0, T3N1M0, or T4N0M0 | 35% |
| 3b | T3N2M0 | 35% |
| 4 | T4N1-3M0, TxN3M0, or TxNxM1* | 5% |
*Tx indicates any T stage; Nx, any N stage.
Preferred Examination
- Begin the evaluation with history taking and physical examination.
- Perform blood tests, including a full blood count determination and liver function tests.
- Inspect the stool, and test for occult blood.
- Perform either fiberoptic endoscopy or a double-contrast study (barium and gas) of the upper GI tract.
- Endoscopy has become the diagnostic procedure of choice for patients with suspected gastric carcinoma. Biopsy samples obtained during endoscopy enable histologic diagnosis. However, endoscopy is more invasive and more costly than a double-contrast study.
- Double-contrast examinations of the upper GI tract remain a useful alternative to endoscopy and have similar sensitivity in the detection of gastric cancer.
- CT, MRI, and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) are used in staging but not usually in the primary detection of gastric cancers (see the CAT Scan, MRI, and Ultrasound sections).
Limitations of Techniques
Endoscopy with biopsy has a sensitivity of 95%. Multiple biopsy specimens are needed to avoid sampling errors. Endoscopy is less reliable in the diagnosis of scirrhous tumors (35-70%). False-negative biopsy results may delay diagnosis.
Single-contrast barium studies have an overall sensitivity of 75%, but double-contrast barium examinations have a sensitivity of 90-95% in the detection of gastric cancer, comparable to endoscopy.
Differential Diagnoses
Crohn Disease
Gastric Ulcer
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors -
Leiomyoma/Leiomyosarcoma
Other Problems to Be Considered
- Gastric lymphoma
- Gastric metastases
- Gastritis
- Gastric varices
- Gastric polyps
- Peptic ulcers
| ||||||||||
References
Anonymous. V.I. Gavrilov. Acta Virol. Nov 1975;19(6):510. [Medline].
Ba-Ssalamah A, Prokop M, Uffmann M. Dedicated multidetector CT of the stomach: spectrum of diseases. Radiographics. May-Jun 2003;23(3):625-44.
Baker MK, Kopecky KK. Endoscopic US in the staging of esophageal and gastric cancer. Radiology. Nov 1991;181(2):342-3. [Medline].
Balfe DM, Koehler RE, Karstaedt N. Computed tomography of gastric neoplasms. Radiology. Aug 1981;140(2):431-6. [Medline].
Botet JF, Lightdale CJ, Zauber AG. Preoperative staging of gastric cancer: comparison of endoscopic US and dynamic CT. Radiology. Nov 1991;181(2):426-32. [Medline].
Chin BB, Chang PP. Gastrointestinal malignancies evaluated with (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. Feb 2006;20(1):3-21.
Cho JS, Kim JK, Rho SM. Preoperative assessment of gastric carcinoma: value of two-phase dynamic CT with mechanical iv. injection of contrast material. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jul 1994;163(1):69-75. [Medline].
Devesa SS, Blot WJ, Fraumeni JF Jr. Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States. Cancer. Nov 15 1998;83(10):2049-53. [Medline].
Fishman EK, Urban BA, Hruban RH. CT of the stomach: spectrum of disease. Radiographics. Sep 1996;16(5):1035-54. [Medline].
Forman D, Newell DG, Fullerton F. Association between infection with Helicobacter pylori and risk of gastric cancer: evidence from a prospective investigation. BMJ. Jun 1 1991;302(6788):1302-5. [Medline].
Fuchs CS, Mayer RJ. Gastric carcinoma. N Engl J Med. Jul 6 1995;333(1):32-41. [Medline].
Halvorsen RA Jr, Yee J, McCormick VD. Diagnosis and staging of gastric cancer. Semin Oncol. Jun 1996;23(3):325-35. [Medline].
Harrison LE, Zhang ZF, Karpeh MS. The role of dietary factors in the intestinal and diffuse histologic subtypes of gastric adenocarcinoma: a case-control study in the U.S. Cancer. Sep 15 1997;80(6):1021-8. [Medline].
Huntsman DG, Carneiro F, Lewis FR. Early gastric cancer in young, asymptomatic carriers of germ-line E- cadherin mutations. N Engl J Med. Jun 21 2001;344(25):1904-9. [Medline].
Ingram M, Arregui ME. Endoscopic ultrasonography. Surg Clin North Am. Aug 2004;84(4):1035-59, vi. [Medline].
Jadvar H, Tatlidil R, Garcia AA. Evaluation of recurrent gastric malignancy with [F-18]-FDG positron emission tomography. Clin Radiol. Mar 2003;58(3):215-21.
Kim AY, Han JK, Seong CK. MRI in staging advanced gastric cancer: is it useful compared with spiral CT?. J Comput Assist Tomogr. May-Jun 2000;24(3):389-94. [Medline].
Kriplani AK, Kapur BM. Laparoscopy for pre-operative staging and assessment of operability in gastric carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc. Jul-Aug 1991;37(4):441-3. [Medline].
Lee JH, Jeong YK, Kim DH. Two-phase helical CT for detection of early gastric carcinoma: importance of the mucosal phase for analysis of the abnormal mucosal layer. J Comput Assist Tomogr. Sep-Oct 2000;24(5):777-82. [Medline].
Lee JM, Han YM, Kim CS. Fluoroscopic-guided covered metallic stent placement for gastric outlet obstruction and post-operative gastroenterostomy anastomotic stricture. Clin Radiol. Jul 2001;56(7):560-7. [Medline].
Low VH, Levine MS, Rubesin SE. Diagnosis of gastric carcinoma: sensitivity of double-contrast barium studies. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Feb 1994;162(2):329-34. [Medline].
Matsushita M, Oi H, Murakami T. Extraserosal invasion in advanced gastric cancer: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology. Jul 1994;192(1):87-91. [Medline].
McAteer D, Wallis F, Couper G. Evaluation of 18F-FDG positron emission tomography in gastric and oesophageal carcinoma. Br J Radiol. Jun 1999;72(858):525-9. [Medline].
McLean A, Fairclough P. Endoscopic ultrasound--current applications. Clin Radiol. Feb 1996;51(2):83-98. [Medline].
Neugut AI, Hayek M, Howe G. Epidemiology of gastric cancer. Semin Oncol. Jun 1996;23(3):281-91. [Medline].
Ng VW, Husband JE, Nicolson VM. CT evaluation of treatment response in advanced gastric cancer. Clin Radiol. Mar 1996;51(3):215-20. [Medline].
Parker SL, Tong T, Bolden S. Cancer statistics, 1996. CA Cancer J Clin. Jan-Feb 1996;46(1):5-27. [Medline].
Parsonnet J, Friedman GD, Vandersteen DP. Helicobacter pylori infection and the risk of gastric carcinoma. N Engl J Med. Oct 17 1991;325(16):1127-31. [Medline].
Powell J, McConkey CC. Increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia and adjacent sites. Br J Cancer. Sep 1990;62(3):440-3. [Medline].
Shindoh N, Nakagawa T, Ozaki Y. Overlooked gastric carcinoma: pitfalls in upper gastrointestinal radiology. Radiology. Nov 2000;217(2):409-14. [Medline].
Sohn KM, Lee JM, Lee SY. Comparing MR imaging and CT in the staging of gastric carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jun 2000;174(6):1551-7. [Medline].
Stell DA, Carter CR, Stewart I. Prospective comparison of laparoscopy, ultrasonography and computed tomography in the staging of gastric cancer. Br J Surg. Sep 1996;83(9):1260-2. [Medline].
Trenkner SW, Halvorsen RA Jr, Thompson WM. Neoplasms of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Radiol Clin North Am. Jan 1994;32(1):15-24. [Medline].
Tsukuma H, Mishima T, Oshima A. Prospective study of "early" gastric cancer. Int J Cancer. Apr 15 1983;31(4):421-6.
Vander Noot MR, Eloubeidi MA, Chen VK, et al. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal tract lesions by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Cancer. Jun 25 2004;102(3):157-63. [Medline].
White RM, Levine MS, Enterline HT. Early gastric cancer. Recent experience. Radiology. Apr 1985;155(1):25-7. [Medline].
Ziegler K, Sanft C, Zimmer T. Comparison of computed tomography, endosonography, and intraoperative assessment in TN staging of gastric carcinoma. Gut. May 1993;34(5):604-10. [Medline].
Further Reading
Keywords
adenocarcinoma of the stomach, gastric adenocarcinoma, gastric cancer, stomach cancer, stomach carcinoma, gastric lymphoma, gastric leiomyosarcoma, gastric carcinoid, gastric sarcoma