Excerpt from CholangiocarcinomaSynonyms, Key Words, and Related Terms: malignant bile duct tumors, biliary malignancy, primary hepatic tumors, bile duct cancer, intrahepatic tumors, extrahepatic tumors, Klatskin tumors, liver cancer, Clonorchis sinensis, C sinensis, Opisthorchis viverrini, Opisthorchis viverrini Please click here to view the full topic text: CholangiocarcinomaBackgroundCholangiocarcinoma is a slow-growing malignancy of the bile duct. It is the second most common primary hepatic tumor after hepatoma. The cause of bile duct cancer is unclear. Results of some epidemiologic studies have implicated bacteria-induced carcinogens derived from bile salts (eg, lithocholate) as a causative factor in the pathogenesis of cholangiocarcinomas. Biliary ductal calculi occur in 20-50% of patients with cholangiocarcinoma; however, the association of gallstones with cholangiocarcinoma is less marked than it is with carcinoma of the gallbladder. The most common cause of malignant biliary obstruction is pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Gallbladder carcinoma is 9 times more common than bile duct malignancy. High-risk groups for cholangiocarcinomas include patients with the following:
PathophysiologyOrigin Most of the tumors are adenocarcinomas originating from the biliary epithelium. The tumors can be nodular or diffuse (sclerosing scirrhous tumor). All cholangiocarcinomas grow slowly, infiltrate locally, and metastasize late in the course of the disease. Classification The tumors are classified as extrahepatic tumors (87-92%) or intrahepatic tumors (8-13%). Extrahepatic tumors are divided into proximal, middle, and distal ductal tumors. Tumors located at the confluence of the right and left hepatic ducts with the proximal common hepatic duct are called Klatskin tumors. Intrahepatic tumors arise from the small ducts and are often diffuse and multicentric; satellite nodules occur in about 65% of patients. Solitary well-demarcated tumors are difficult to differentiate from primary hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). The diffuse sclerosing or scirrhous types are densely fibrotic and have annular long strictures. Compared with other tumors, they are less cellular and have relatively few well-differentiated carcinoma cells in a dense connective tissue stroma. They are generally confined to the proximal ducts. The nodular variety is also called the papillary type. The tumors are nodular on the intraluminal and extraluminal surfaces, and they form irregular strictures. They are most common in the distal duct and in the periampullary region. The papillary tumors are friable and vascular and tend to bleed easily, causing hemobilia. Intrahepatic tumors have a special predilection for perineural spread. Hematogenous spread to the liver, peritoneum, or lung is extremely rare. Lymphatic spread is common and occurs in the cystic and common bile duct (CBD) nodes in about 32% of extrahepatic tumors and 15% of intrahepatic tumors. Extrahepatic tumors also spread to the celiac nodes in about 16% of cases and to the peripancreatic and superior mesenteric nodes. Infiltration of adjacent liver occurs in 23% of cases, and peritoneal seeding occurs in 9%. FrequencyUnited StatesPrimary cancers of the liver and intrahepatic bile ducts account for only 1.5% of all cancers in the United States. Five-year survival rates are low in the United States, usually less than 10%. About 20% of liver cancers involve cholangiocarcinoma arising from the intrahepatic branches of the ductal system. InternationalCholangiocarcinoma is associated with C sinensis infestation, which is by far the most common cause worldwide. The prevalence of biliary tract and gallbladder cancer in England and Wales is 2.8 cases per 100,000 in females and 2.0 cases per 100,000 in males. Mortality/MorbidityLess than 20% of intrahepatic tumors are resectable. Distal and periampullary extrahepatic tumors are resectable, with a 5-year survival rate of 39%. The reported 5-year survival rate in patients with resected proximal tumors is 5-15%.
RaceNo specific race-related increase in prevalence exists, although the incidence in the Far Eastern countries is increased. This difference is related to dietary habits, notably the consumption of improperly cooked seafood contaminated with parasites. SexIn contrast to gallbladder carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma has a male preponderance, with a male-to-female ratio of 3:2. AgeThe patient's age at presentation may vary, but the incidence peaks in those in the 50s.
AnatomyThe right and left hepatic ducts merge to form the common hepatic duct. The right and left hepatic ducts drain bile from their respective lobes of liver. The cystic duct insertion point marks the end of the common hepatic duct. The duct below the level of the cystic duct is referred to as CBD. The vaterian segment includes the distal 2.5-3.0 cm of the CBD, along with the distal part of the pancreatic duct and the ampulla. Tumor involves only the left or right hepatic duct in 8-13% of cases, whereas tumor involves the confluence of the ducts (Klatskin tumor) in 10-26%. Tumor involves the common hepatic duct in 14-37% of cases. Cholangiocarcinoma involves the proximal CBD in 15-30% of cases and the distal CBD in 30-50%. Cystic duct cholangiocarcinoma occurs in 6% of cases. Clinical DetailsIntrahepatic tumors may cause abdominal pain, palpable masses, weight loss, and painless jaundice. Abdominal pain is the most common symptom; it is a feature in 47% of cases, whereas painless jaundice occurs in only 12%. Obstructive jaundice occurs in 90% of cholangiocarcinomas and is progressive with pruritus and anorexia. The duration of symptoms is usually short (ie, months). Some patients may have cholangitis or acute cholecystitis. Patients may have chronic blood loss due to papillary tumors and resultant anemia. Physical examination reveals hepatomegaly, and a mass is palpable in about 18% of patients. The gallbladder may be palpable in patients with distal tumors. Preferred ExaminationThe first-line investigation in a patient with jaundice or right upper quadrant pain is ultrasonography (US). Biliary ductal dilatation is easily demonstrated with US, but the tumor mass is seldom localized with it. CT may demonstrate the tumor if the malignancy is nodular and masslike, but tumors of the diffuse sclerosing variety are difficult to detect. Compared with the other techniques, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a more definitive investigation that can depict the periampullary tumor. However, with the advent of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), easy demonstration of stricture-causing tumors is possible. The disadvantages of MRCP are its inability to distend the duct and the equivocal findings due to long segments and minimal narrowing in diffuse sclerosing tumors. Celiac-axis arteriography is required to assess the vascular supply and the potential for resectability. MR angiography has shown some promising results, with a sensitivity similar to that of conventional angiography in demonstrating the mesenteric circulation. The role of endoscopic and intraductal US in the management of these tumors is yet to be defined. Furthermore, determination of the preferred examination is complex in the presence of a predisposing condition such as primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Recent findings have demonstrated the potential role of positron emission tomography (PET), which improves the depiction of cholangiocarcinoma superimposed on PSC. Please click here to view the full topic text: Cholangiocarcinoma |
| About Us | Privacy | Code of Ethics | Terms of Use | Contact Us | Advertising | Institutional Subscribers |
|
|
|||
|
| Medicine is a constantly changing science and not all therapies are clearly established. New research changes drug and treatment therapies daily. The authors, editors, and publisher of this journal have used their best efforts to provide information that is up-to-date and accurate and is generally accepted within medical standards at the time of publication. However, as medical science is constantly changing and human error is always possible, the authors, editors, and publisher or any other party involved with the publication of this article do not warrant the information in this article is accurate or complete, nor are they responsible for omissions or errors in the article or for the results of using this information. The reader should confirm the information in this article from other sources prior to use. In particular, all drug doses, indications, and contraindications should be confirmed in the package insert. FULL DISCLAIMER |