Continually Updated Clinical Reference
 
 
  All Sources     eMedicine     Medscape     Drug Reference     MEDLINE
 
eMedicine - Colitis, Pseudomembranous : Article by

Quick Find
Authors & Editors
Introduction
Differentials
Radiograph
CT SCAN
Ultrasound
Multimedia
References

Related Articles
Appendicitis

Colitis, Ischemic

Colon, Diverticulitis

Crohn Disease

Typhlitis

Ulcerative Colitis




Patient Education
Click here for patient education.



Author: Vinay K Gheyi, MD, MBBS, Chief of Radiology, Department of Radiology, McGuire VA Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia

Coauthor(s): John S Wills, MD, Associate Professor of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University; Chair, Department of Radiology, Pennsylvania Hospital; Raul N Uppot, MD, Instructor in Radiology, Harvard Medical School;, Assistant Radiologist, Department of Radiology, Section of Abdominal Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital

Editors: John L Haddad, MD, Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University; Director of Body MRI, Department of Radiology, Methodist Hospital in Houston; Bernard D Coombs, MB, ChB, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Specialist Rehabilitation Services, Hutt Valley District Health Board, New Zealand; Spencer B Gay, MD, Professor of Radiology, Director of Body Computed Tomography, Department of Radiology, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center; Robert M Krasny, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute; Eugene C Lin, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Radiology, Virginia Mason Medical Center

Author and Editor Disclosure

Synonyms and related keywords: clostridium difficile disease, PMC

Background

Pseudomembranous colitis (PMC) is a descriptive term for colitides defined by the presence of pseudomembranes on the colonic or small intestinal mucosa.1 Although small intestine can be involved in PMC, most cases encountered in the modern era involve only the colon. Clostridium difficile infection is responsible for virtually all cases of PMC and for as many as 20% of cases of antibiotic-induced diarrhea without colitis.2

The etiology of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and colitis not caused by C difficile is poorly understood, and a variety of other organisms have been implicated as causative agents, including Staphylococcus aureus, Candida species, Clostridium perfringens, and salmonellosis.3

Pseudomembranous lesions in the intestinal tract, originally reported in 1893, were thought to be caused by S aureus on the basis of its recovery in the stool samples of affected patients. With time, S enterocolitis (involving both small intestine and colon) became an accepted entity. Widespread antibiotic use made PMC a common problem, and it became apparent that the disease primarily involved the colon and only rarely involved the small intestine. In 1977, C difficile was recognized as the pathogen responsible for the development of PMC.

Pathophysiology

PMC is a descriptive term for colitides associated with pseudomembrane formation on the colonic mucosa (see Images 1-2). Pseudomembrane production is not always related to antibiotic administration; it may also may result from mucosal ischemia. However, the most common cause of PMC is C difficile overgrowth secondary to antibiotic therapy.

Other causative factors for PMC are abdominal surgery, colonic obstruction, uremia, and prolonged hypotension causing hypoperfusion of the bowel. PMC also has been described with lymphoma, leukemias, and advanced HIV infection.4 Key steps in the pathogenesis of C difficilemediated diarrhea and colitis include the following:

  1. Disruption of colonic flora by an antibiotic or antineoplastic agent with antibacterial activity
  2. Colonization with C difficile
  3. Elaboration of toxin A and toxin B, both of which mediate cytoskeletal derangement in target cells
  4. Mucosal injury and inflammation3

Although clindamycin and lincomycin classically have been linked to PMC, virtually all antibiotics can cause PMC. Cephalosporins and ampicillin may be the most common antibiotics associated with PMC on the basis of their widespread use.1 Most cases of PMC are associated with oral rather than parenteral administration of antibiotics.1 PMC can begin within days after initiation of antibiotic therapy or can occur up to 6 weeks after discontinuation.

The basic mechanism in pathogenesis of PMC is overgrowth of C difficile and toxin production by the organism that causes a wide spectrum of illnesses ranging from mild diarrhea to life-threatening PMC. The anaerobes that are normally present in the colon control colonization by C difficile; therefore, antibiotics that are most active against anaerobic organisms are more commonly associated with PMC. Toxin-mediated direct endothelial damage is the accepted theory for pathogenesis of PMC. Production of at least 2 types of toxins by the C difficile organism is required for clinical expression. Toxin A is an enterotoxin, while toxin B is a cytotoxin.

Frequency

United States

Antibiotic use is commonly associated with diarrhea without colitis. Overall rates of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in hospitals range from 3.2-29%. As many as 25% of patients develop self-limiting diarrhea following ampicillin or clindamycin administration. Of hospitalized patients, 15% of those receiving beta-lactam antibiotics and approximately 10-25% receiving clindamycin develop diarrhea. Few of these patients actually develop PMC. C difficile is responsible for development of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in 20-30% of patients and in more than 90% of patients who develop antibiotic-associated PMC.3

Mortality/Morbidity

Mortality rates of PMC in various series vary from 1.1-3.5%.4 PMC causes significant morbidity because of its variable and nonspecific clinical manifestations at presentation, potentially difficult endoscopic diagnosis, and delayed results of stool assays. Approximately 5% of patients may present with features suggestive of acute abdomen or sepsis with resultant unwarranted laparotomy.4 Overall morbidity and economic burden of antibiotic-associated diarrhea are difficult to quantify; however, various studies have demonstrated significantly higher death rates and increased hospital costs.3

Age

Definite age-related susceptibility is observed with C difficile, with adults being more susceptible than children. Neonates can harbor the organism and its toxin without apparent consequence. In addition, older children, despite frequent antibiotic use, rarely develop PMC. The exact cause of such age-related susceptibility is not clear. It may be secondary to lack of mature enterocytic membrane receptor for the toxin, preventing binding of the toxin to the bowel wall and subsequent production of PMC.1

Clinical Details

Infection with toxigenic C difficile causes a spectrum of diseases ranging from the asymptomatic carrier state, particularly in neonates, to a fulminant relapsing and occasionally fatal colitis.3 The typical clinical presentation is diarrhea, abdominal pain, fever, leukocytosis, and an often-overlooked history of recent/concurrent use of antibiotics. Hospital inpatients may be asymptomatic or may only have mild-to-moderate symptoms.4 In severe cases, life-threatening colitis may develop, progressing to toxic megacolon and subsequent perforation.

In rare cases, extraintestinal manifestations occur, including bacteremia, osteomyelitis, and splenic abscess. Other clinical manifestations that have been described are reactive arthritis and tenosynovitis. As with other reactive arthritides following enteric infections, many patients are positive for human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B27.3 Nonspecific symptomatology of PMC mimics features of acute abdomen, especially sepsis or intra-abdominal infection and abscess.

Most of these patients undergo ultrasound or CT examination without clinical suspicion of PMC.1 Thus, it is important for radiologists to recognize the radiologic features of PMC, since the radiologist is often the first physician to suggest the diagnosis.

Preferred Examination

It is important to note that even though the diagnosis of PMC may be suggested by imaging, it is not the method of choice for establishing the diagnosis. This is done by stool assays for C difficile toxins or colonoscopy.

Limitations of Techniques

Of patients with PMC, 90% or more demonstrate either C difficile or its toxins in stool samples.3 A variety of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests that detect toxin A or B are available. When strict diagnostic criteria that include clinical diarrhea, positive cytotoxin assay, and positive culture are used, a sensitivity of 63-94% and specificity of 75-100% can be achieved.3

Flexible sigmoidoscopy alone without the use of colonoscopy may not detect up to 10% of cases of PMC. When PMC is not accompanied by pseudomembrane formation, endoscopic findings are relatively nonspecific, but a biopsy may reveal changes typical of PMC.3 Colonoscopy characteristically demonstrates 2- to 10-mm adherent yellow plaques; however, colonoscopy may be negative or nonspecific in 25-70% of patients.1



Appendicitis
Colitis, Ischemic
Colon, Diverticulitis
Crohn Disease
Typhlitis
Ulcerative Colitis


Findings

Plain films of the abdomen are notoriously insensitive for diagnosis of PMC. The findings may range from normal to nonspecific, but as plain films are often the first studies to be ordered, it is important to be aware of these findings. Classic findings consist of the following:

  1. Colonic dilatation — Findings range from colonic ileus to toxic megacolon and even perforation with pneumoperitoneum. Toxic megacolon is suggested by acute dilatation of transverse colon to a diameter greater than 6 cm associated with systemic toxicity and the absence of mechanical obstruction.
  2. Nodular haustral thickening (see Image 3) — This is considered to be fairly specific for PMC but is observed only in severe cases.1 Any part of the colon may be involved. In a study by Boland et al, the transverse colon was most commonly involved, followed by the left colon and then the right colon.5 
  3. Thumb printing — This is nonspecific, since it can be observed with either inflammatory or ischemic colitis.

Barium enema

Contrast enemas should be avoided in patients with possible PMC because of potential risk for perforation. Barium enemas are rarely indicated, especially with the advent of cross-sectional imaging.

Barium enema findings may vary, depending on the severity of the disease. In the milder forms, nodular filling defects involving the mucosa may be observed that coalesce as the disease progresses, giving an irregular appearance to the bowel wall (see Image 4). The serrated outline of the colon does not result from mucosal ulceration but, rather, is a consequence of trapped barium between the plaquelike membranes.

Degree of Confidence

Plain radiographic abnormalities may be observed in only 32% of cases of PMC.5

False Positives/Negatives

Plain film findings may suggest a diagnosis of PMC but usually are insensitive. Even if the radiographs demonstrate abnormalities, they tend to underestimate the extent and severity of the disease.4



Findings

With increased use of CT as a primary imaging modality in the evaluation of patients with diffuse abdominal pain or fever, it is critical for radiologists to recognize CT features of PMC.1 CT findings, although not specific, may be highly suggestive of PMC, and CT is excellent for evaluation of the extent of PMC (Ros, 1996).1

The following are CT findings in PMC:

  1. Marked colonic wall thickening (see Image 5). Colonic wall thickening is the most common CT finding in patients with PMC and ranges from 3-32 mm.4 Most cases reveal total colonic involvement; however, focal and segmental involvement has been well documented. Mural thickening can be smooth or irregular and eccentric or concentric. PMC more often causes irregular and shaggy wall thickening rather than the smooth and homogeneous thickening observed with Crohn disease.4
  2. Target sign — On contrast-enhanced CT, mucosal hyperemia leads to enhancement with relatively hypodense submucosa secondary to edematous changes. This gives the appearance of a bull's eye or target sign. The sign is better appreciated on the arterial phase of enhancement. It is a nonspecific sign and has been reported with other forms of colitis such as Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis.
  3. Accordion sign — This is highly suggestive of PMC but is only observed in advanced disease. The cause of this sign is entrapment of orally administered barium in between thick and edematous haustral folds, giving alternating low- and high-density bands (see Image 6).
  4. Pericolonic stranding — If observed, this is usually mild, reflecting mucosal rather than serosal involvement. The typical CT appearance of PMC is mild pericolonic stranding disproportionate to marked colonic wall thickening.
  5. Ascites — This is a nonspecific finding and tends to occur in severe cases of PMC. Ascites is observed on CT in an average of 35% of patients.1
  6. Other findings — Pneumatosis, toxic megacolon, and portal venous gas may be observed. These features are nonspecific and may be observed with severe colitis of any cause.

Degree of Confidence

The sensitivity of detection of PMC on CT is approximately 85%. Specificity of CT is low (approximately 48%), since other types of colitis can cause a similar appearance.6



Findings

Ultrasound is not commonly used for evaluation of possible PMC; however, it may be helpful in evaluation of postoperative patients in surgical intensive care units who are on antibiotics and develop nonspecific abdominal symptoms.1 Thickened colon may be discovered incidentally during ultrasound examination of the abdomen.

Ultrasound findings rely on wall thickening of the colon, as well as the target sign, demonstrated by hyperechoic mucosa in the background of hypoechoic edematous submucosa. Ascites may be an associated finding and has been observed in as many as 77% of cases.7



Media file 1:  Gross pathology specimen from a case of pseudomembranous colitis revealing characteristic yellowish plaques.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 2:  Gross pathology specimen from a case of pseudomembranous colitis demonstrating characteristic yellowish plaques.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 3:  Frontal abdominal radiograph in a patient with proved pseudomembranous colitis. Note the nodular haustral thickening, most pronounced in the transverse colon.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  X-RAY

Media file 4:  Barium enema demonstrating typical serrated appearance of the barium column resulting from trapped barium between the edematous mucosal folds and the plaquelike membranes in pseudomembranous colitis.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  X-RAY

Media file 5:  CT findings in a proved case of pseudomembranous colitis demonstrating wall thickening of the transverse colon.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  CT

Media file 6:  CT scan in a patient with pseudomembranous colitis demonstrating the classic accordion sign.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  CT



  1. Ros PR, Buetow PC, Pantograg-Brown L, et al. Pseudomembranous colitis. Radiology. Jan 1996;198(1):1-9. [Medline].
  2. Kelly CP, Pothoulakis C, LaMont JT. Clostridium difficile colitis. N Engl J Med. Jan 27 1994;330(4):257-62. [Medline].
  3. Thielman NM. Pseudomembranous colitis. In: Mandell, Douglas and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 5th ed. 2000:1111-1126.
  4. Kawamoto S, Horton KM, Fishman EK. Pseudomembranous colitis: spectrum of imaging findings with clinical and pathologic correlation. Radiographics. Jul-Aug 1999;19(4):887-97. [Medline].
  5. Boland GW, Lee MJ, Cats A, Mueller PR. Pseudomembranous colitis: diagnostic sensitivity of the abdominal plain radiograph. Clin Radiol. Jul 1994;49(7):473-5. [Medline].
  6. Boland GW, Lee MJ, Cats AM, et al. Antibiotic-induced diarrhea: specificity of abdominal CT for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile disease. Radiology. Apr 1994;191(1):103-6. [Medline].
  7. Downey DB, Wilson SR. Pseudomembranous colitis: sonographic features. Radiology. Jul 1991;180(1):61-4. [Medline].
  8. Brook I. Pseudomembranous colitis in children. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. Feb 2005;20(2):182-6. [Medline].
  9. Jung SW, Jeon SW, Do BH, Kim SG, Ha SS, Cho CM. Clinical aspects of rifampicin-associated pseudomembranous colitis. J Clin Gastroenterol. Jan 2007;41(1):38-40. [Medline].
  10. Ramachandran I, Sinha R, Rodgers P. Pseudomembranous colitis revisited: spectrum of imaging findings. Clin Radiol. Jul 2006;61(7):535-44. [Medline].
  11. Wolf PL, Kasyan A. Images in clinical medicine. Pseudomembranous colitis associated with Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med. Dec 8 2005;353(23):2491. [Medline].

Colitis, Pseudomembranous excerpt

Article Last Updated: Sep 19, 2007