| Patient Education |
|
Click here for patient education.
|
|
You are in: eMedicine Specialties >
Clinical Procedures > Musculoskeletal Procedures
Joint Reduction, Shoulder Dislocation, Anterior
Article Last Updated: Jul 22, 2007
AUTHOR AND EDITOR INFORMATION
Section 1 of 15  
Author: Patricia Rivera, MD, MPH, Staff Physician, Emergency Department, NYU/Bellevue
Coauthor(s):
Curt E Dill, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University School of Medicine; Medical Director, Emergency Care Institute; Consulting Staff, VA Medical Center, Tisch Hospital, Brookdale Hospital Center, Bellevue Hospital Center
Editors: Erik D Schraga, MD, Consulting Staff, Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente, Santa Clara Medical Center; Mary L Windle, PharmD, Adjunct Assistant Professor, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Pharmacy, Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine.com, Inc; Luis M Lovato, MD, Assistant Clinical Professor, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA; Director of Critical Care, Department of Emergency Medicine, Olive View/UCLA Medical Center; Gil Z Shlamovitz, MD, Attending Physician, Windham Memorial Community Hospital; Rick Kulkarni, MD, Medical Director, Assistant Professor of Surgery, Section of Emergency Medicine, Yale-New Haven Hospital
Author and Editor Disclosure
Synonyms and related keywords:
anterior shoulder dislocation, anterior shoulder reduction, Hill-Sachs deformity, Bankart fracture, Stimson maneuver, scapular manipulation, traction-countertraction, Milch technique, Spaso technique, Waldron’s variation
Anterior shoulder dislocations are the most common major joint dislocation seen and reduced in the emergency department. Treatment and reduction may be straightforward and easily accomplished or may be fraught with difficulty and coincident injuries. Nevertheless, with vigilance and a sound assessment, a high success rate can be achieved and unnecessary complications can be avoided. Clinical assessment Anterior shoulder dislocations can occur with high force injuries, such as falling on an outstretched arm, or with relatively minor forces in persons with a history of recurrent dislocations.
The patient typically presents with an obvious squared-off shoulder and a palpable humeral head located inferior and medial to the normal anatomic location. The patient generally resists attempts to adduct or internally rotate the arm.
Management Reduction techniques can vary in terms of required force, time, equipment, and staff. No single reduction method is successful in every instance, so the clinician should be familiar with several reduction techniques. Adequate pain control and muscle relaxation are key to a successful smooth reduction.
In a young healthy patient who has an obvious anterior shoulder dislocation and who is neurovascularly intact and carries a history of recurrent dislocations, reduction can be performed prior to radiologic evaluation to identify associated fractures. However, one should maintain a low threshold of suspicion for complicating factors and obtain prereduction radiographs liberally.
Clinical factors that have been associated with clinically significant fractures include first episode, patient aged more than 40 years, or involvement in 1 of the 3 selected mechanisms of injury (ie, fall from more than one flight of stairs, fight or assault, motor vehicle collision).
The 4 types of anterior shoulder dislocation are subcoracoid, subglenoid, subclavicular, and intrathoracic. Subcoracoid and subglenoid dislocations account for 99% of anterior shoulder dislocations and are amenable to reduction by the emergency department physician. Subclavicular or intrathoracic dislocations, which are caused by large forces, are not easily corrected by standard methods.
Absolute contraindications Standard shoulder reduction is absolutely contraindicated if prompt surgical consultation is indicated.
- Subclavicular or intrathoracic dislocations
- Suspicion for major arterial injury: Physical findings include paresthesias, diminished pulse, paleness or coolness of affected extremity, pain out of proportion to examination, and paralysis.
- Associated fractures of the humeral neck: Attempts at reduction may result in avascular necrosis.
Relative contraindications Minor neurovascular injuries and common fractures listed below do not prohibit reduction but require a prompt and atraumatic reduction with avoidance of multiple attempts.
- Nerve injuries
- The brachial plexus, axillary nerve, or musculocutaneous nerve may be injured.
- Neurapraxias (contusions of the nerve) usually resolve within weeks.
- Evaluate the axillary nerve, the most commonly injured nerve, by testing for sensation in the lateral upper arm and palpating for contraction of the deltoid muscle while the patient abducts against resistance.
- Common fractures
- The Hill-Sachs deformity, a compression fracture of the posterolateral aspect of the humeral head, and Bankart fracture, a detachment of the anterior aspect of the glenoid rim, may occur as the result of the dislocating force as the humeral head presses forcefully against the glenoid rim.
- Avulsion fractures of the greater tuberosity of the humeral head tend to heal well but require immediate orthopedic consult if the displacement is more than 1 cm.
Pain control and muscle relaxation are key to an easy reduction. Depending on the patient, one or both of the following methods may be used. - Intravenous procedural sedation and analgesia
- Intra-articular lidocaine
- Under sterile conditions, insert a 35-mm needle (18-20 ga) 2 cm inferior to the lateral edge of the acromion into the glenohumeral joint.
- After aspirating blood, inject 10-20 mL of lidocaine 1% over 30 seconds. Then, wait 15-20 minutes before performing the procedure.
Intra-articular lidocaine injection. - Advantages
- Drainage of hemarthrosis
- Eliminates need for intravenous access
- Reduces risk of respiratory depression and cardiac compromise, staff involvement for monitoring, length of emergency department stay, and cost
- Disadvantage - Risk of infecting the joint space
The equipment required depends on the technique used. See Technique for details.
The positioning required depends on the technique used. See Technique for details.
Techniques vary in regard to the amount of force, time, equipment, and assistance needed. Most techniques are facilitated by the following 2 maneuvers: - Flexion of the elbow 90° to relax the biceps tendon
- External rotation of the humerus, which releases the superior glenohumeral ligament and presents the favorable side of the humeral head to the glenoid fossa
Signs of a successful reduction include the following: - Palpable or audible clunk
- Return of rounded shoulder contour
- Relief of pain
- Increase in range of motion (eg, patient can touch opposite shoulder with palm of affected arm)
Before attempts at reduction, explain the procedure, benefits, risks, and complications to the patient or the patient's representative and obtain a signed informed consent. Ask the patient or the patient's representative if he or she would like others to be present for the procedure.
Specific TechniquesStimson maneuver - Equipment
- Weights, 5-10 lb
- Weight straps
- Sheets or extra straps
- Position
- Position the patient prone on an elevated stretcher. Position the affected shoulder off the edge of the stretcher, hanging downward in 90° of forward flexion.
- The stretcher should be high enough to allow the patient’s arm to dangle without touching the floor.
- Technique
- To prevent the patient from sliding off the stretcher, strap the patient tightly with a sheet and then securely fasten 5-10 lb of weight to the patient’s wrist to provide continuous traction. If weights are unavailable, two to four 1 L containers of normal saline and stockinette can be used (as demonstrated in the picture).
- Instruct patient to maintain this position for at least 15-20 minutes or until reduction is accomplished.
- To facilitate reduction, the physician may apply gentle external rotation of the extended arm, flexion of the elbow 90°, or scapular manipulation (as described below).
Stimson maneuver.
- Advantages
- No assistance is required.
- Shoulder is reduced with minimal force (gravity and weights).
- Scapular manipulation, with proper sedation, has a success rate of 96%.1
- Disadvantages
- Patient may slip off the elevated stretcher.
- Patient must be monitored at all times.
- Equipment is necessary.
- Sufficient premedication is necessary.
- Time required for reduction is relatively long.
Scapular manipulation - Equipment - None
- Position - Prone or seated, with back exposed
- Technique
- Place affected arm in 90° of forward flexion at the shoulder and apply slight traction.
- If in prone position, use weights (as in the Stimson technique) or have an assistant apply manual downward traction.
- If in seated position, have an assistant stand, facing the patient, and use one arm to firmly grasp the wrist of the dislocated arm. The assistant should then apply steady forward traction parallel to the floor while applying countertraction with the other arm, which is outstretched and resting on the patient’s clavicle.
Sitting position for scapular manipulation.
- Stand lateral to the affected shoulder and stabilize the scapula by placing the palm of one hand on the superior outer corner with thumb securely on the superior lateral border. Place other palm over the inferior tip of the scapula and position the thumb on the inferior lateral border of the scapula.
Hand placement for scapular manipulation. - Use both hands to rotate the inferior tip of the scapula medially and the superior aspect laterally with slight dorsal displacement. The goal is to move the glenoid fossa back into anatomical position.
- To facilitate reduction, the assistant may apply, along with traction, slight external rotation of the humerus, elbow flexion in 90°, or both.
- Advantages
- This reduction is tolerated well by patients.
- Reduction can be performed without premedication.
- Minimal force is required.
- Success rate with this maneuver is more than 85%.
- Disadvantages
- The borders of the scapula are difficult to locate in obese patients.
- Assistance is needed for traction if patient is in prone position (if weights are not available) or if patient is in seated position.
External rotation method - Equipment - None
- Position – Supine on stretcher
- Technique
- Using one hand, adduct the affected arm tightly to the patient’s side.
- With the other hand, grasp the patient’s wrist, bend elbow to 90° of flexion, and then gently rotate the upper arm externally, using the forearm as a lever, without force or traction.
- If the patient experiences pain, pause momentarily to allow the muscles of the upper arm to relax. After the pain has subsided, continue until the forearm is in the coronal plane. Reduction takes place between 70-110° of external rotation and, sometimes, during return on internal rotation.
External rotation.
- Advantages
- This reduction is tolerated well by patients.
- This reduction can be performed by a single operator.
- Premedication is not necessary.
- This reduction can be done quickly and easily.
- No force or traction is necessary.
- Disadvantages - Success rate approximately 80% (lower than other methods)
Milch technique
- Equipment – None
- Position – Supine or prone, with shoulder close to edge of stretcher
- Technique
- Place affected arm in full abduction overhead or instruct patient to raise affected arm laterally and behind the head. Operator may assist abduction gently.
- With arm in full abduction, gently apply longitudinal traction and external rotation with one arm.
- If reduction is not completed, use the thumb or fingers to push the humeral head upward into the glenoid fossa with gradual adduction of the extended arm still held in traction.
Milch technique.
- Advantages
- This reduction is tolerated well by patients.
- Procedural sedation is not necessary.
- This reduction can be performed by a single operator.
- Minimal force is required.
- Success rates are 70-90%.
- Disadvantages – None
Spaso technique - Equipment – None
- Position – Supine on stretcher
- Technique
- Grasp the affected arm around the wrist or distal forearm and lift vertically to the ceiling with traction upward toward the ceiling and gentle external rotation. If the patient experiences pain, wait until the muscles relax and continue gently. This may take several minutes.
- If an audible or palpable clunk is not heard, use the other hand to apply direct pressure to the humeral head.
- As an alternative, try the Waldron variation on the Spaso technique. While the elbow is maintained in a flexed position, firmly hold the epicondyles and apply vertical traction on the humerus while alternating the forearm through an arc of 10° of external rotation to 10° of internal rotation.
Spaso technique.
- Advantages
- This reduction can be performed by a single operator.
- Minimal force is required.
- With premedication, this reduction has an 87.5% success rate.
- Disadvantages - None
Traction and countertraction - Equipment – Several sheets or wide straps
- Position – Supine on a securely locked stretcher, with bed elevated to the height of the operator’s ischial tuberosities
Technique - Place one sheet or strap over the patient’s upper chest, under the axilla of the affected shoulder and underneath the back, so that the 2 ends of the sheet are of equal length and open to the unaffected side.
- Standing on the unaffected side, the assistant takes a firm hold of each end of the sheet with each hand or securely ties the sheet around his or her own waist at the level of the ischial tuberosities. When instructed to start, the assistant leans back to provide countertraction with body weight.
- While maintaining the affected arm in 90° of flexion at the elbow, with both hands around the forearm, apply traction by leaning backward with fully extended arms. Use body weight, not upper arm muscles (eg, biceps), to provide traction along the axis of dislocation while the assistant applies countertraction.
- Alternatively, if fatigued, the clinician can wrap another sheet around his or her proximal forearm and tie it around the back, letting the continuous loop sit at the level of the ischial tuberosities. While still holding the elbow in flexion, step back to make the sheet taut and lean back, using body weight to apply traction.
- Apply gentle traction for several minutes until reduction is attained. At reduction, the affected arm is usually lengthened and relaxed, with an audible clunk. Again, slight external rotation may ease reduction.
Traction and countertraction.
Traction and countertraction.
- Advantages
- This traditional method is familiar to most clinicians.
- This reduction has a high rate of success.
- Disadvantages
- Procedural sedation is required.
- More than one operator is required.
- This reduction requires prolonged force and endurance.
- Equipment is needed for this reduction.
Postreduction Care- After reduction, repeat and document the neurovascular examination. Then, obtain postreduction radiographs to confirm reduction and identify any missed fractures.
- The shoulder should be immobilized in a sling and swathe or shoulder immobilizer. Refer the patient for orthopedic follow-up.
- For younger patients, especially those who are active, immobilize for 3-6 weeks. Follow up within 1-2 weeks to evaluate for need for early operative joint stabilization.
- For patients older than 40 years, immobilize the shoulder for 1-2 weeks and follow up in 1 week to reexamine the shoulder. Advise pendular exercises to increase mobility and prevent adhesive capsulitis.
- Rotator cuff tears, which occur in 10-15% of anterior shoulder dislocations, are difficult to evaluate immediately after reduction because of pain and swelling. These injuries are best evaluated at orthopedic follow-up.
- Explain to the patient that most nerve injuries are neurapraxic and should gradually improve and resolve within a few weeks to months.
- Instruct the patient to decrease the risk of recurrence by avoiding activities that involve abduction and external rotation, such as combing hair.
- Prescribe adequate pain medication, but also inform the patient that severe or escalating pain merits immediate reevaluation.
- Make sure the patient’s pain is well-controlled and muscles are relaxed prior to attempts at reduction.
- When reducing a recurrent dislocation, ask the patient to describe what analgesia and reduction technique has been successful in the past.
- When selecting the technique for reduction, keep in mind the current patient load, staff, and equipment availability.
- Consider intraarticular lidocaine as an alternative, especially for patients who have contraindications to intravenous sedation and analgesia.
- With elderly and pediatric patients, take extra care when applying traction with leverage techniques. Be careful not to cause friction injury to the skin when using sheets or straps.
- As part of the clinical evaluation, remember to consider other diagnoses, such as concomitant cervical spine injuries. In addition, referred pain from acute myocardial infarction or splenic rupture may also present as shoulder pain.
- Failed reduction: If multiple attempts at closed reduction fail or signs of neurovascular injury develop, consult an orthopedic surgeon to evaluate for closed reduction or possible open reduction in the operating room under general anesthesia.
- Reduction injuries: Apply the least amount of force during reduction with traction and leverage techniques to avoid the formation or exacerbation of existing fractures or vascular (eg, hemarthrosis) or nerve injuries (eg, neurapraxia). New fractures rarely appear on postreduction films.
- Recurrence: Recurrence is the most common complication, especially with young active patients. Common fractures such as Hill-Sachs deformities or Bankart fractures require prompt orthopedic follow-up because they are associated with increased joint instability and higher risk of redislocation. After evaluation of the shoulder’s range of motion status postreduction, immediate immobilization with a sling and swathe is crucial to prevent recurrence.
American College of Emergency Physicians
1125 Executive Cir
Irving, Tex 75038-2522
800-798-1822
American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons
6300 N River Rd
Rosemont, Ill 60018-4262
847-823-7186
Web Links
eMedicine from WebMD: Dislocations, Shoulder eMedicine from WebMD: Shoulder Dislocation eMedicine from WebMD: Shoulder Dislocations
We would like to thank the Bellevue Housestaff for graciously participating in this project, especially Doctors Adriana Manikian, Karen Franco, Alice Kwan, Heather Larson, and Chris McStay.
- Kothari RU, Dronen SC. Prospective evaluation of the scapular manipulation technique in reducing anterior shoulder dislocations. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21(11):1349-52. [Medline].
- Emond M, Le Sage N, Lavoie A, Rochette L. Clinical factors predicting fractures associated with an anterior shoulder dislocation. Acad Emerg Med. Aug 2004;11(8):853-8. [Medline].
- Marx JA, Hockberg RS, Walls RM. Rosen's Emergency Medicine: Concepts and Clinical Practice. 5th ed. CV Mosby, Inc.; 2002.
- Miller SL, Cleeman E, Auerbach J, Flatow EL. Comparison of intra-articular lidocaine and intravenous sedation for reduction of shoulder dislocations: a randomized, prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Dec 2002;84-A(12):2135-9. [Medline].
- Orlinsky M, Shon S, Chiang C, Chan L, Carter P. Comparative study of intra-articular lidocaine and intravenous meperidine/diazepam for shoulder dislocations. J Emerg Med. Apr 2002;22(3):241-5. [Medline].
- Robert JR, Hedges RJ. Clinical Procedures in Emergency Medicine. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Company; 2004.
- Ufberg JW, Vilke GM, Chan TC, Harrigan RA. Anterior shoulder dislocations: beyond traction-countertraction. J Emerg Med. Oct 2004;27(3):301-6. [Medline].
Joint Reduction, Shoulder Dislocation, Anterior excerpt Article Last Updated: Jul 22, 2007
Topic originally published: Jul 22, 2007
|
View Full Size Image