Continually Updated Clinical Reference
 
 
  All Sources     eMedicine     Medscape     Drug Reference     MEDLINE
 
You are in: eMedicine Specialties > Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation > Cervical Spine Disorders

Cervical Sprain and Strain

Last Updated: October 24, 2006
Email to a Colleague
Synonyms and related keywords: C-spine sprain, C-spine strain, acceleration/deceleration injury, acceleration-deceleration injury, cervical myofascial pain, cervical soft tissue pain syndrome, cervical sprain, cervicobrachial strain, chronic cervical sprain, chronic cervical strain, chronic neck sprain, chronic neck strain, extension-flexion injury, extension/flexion injury, flexion/-extension injury, flexion/extension injury, hyperflexion-hyperextension injury, hyperflexion/hyperextension injury, neck/shoulder girdle soft tissue injury, neck sprain, neck strain, regional soft tissue pain syndrome, WAD, whiplash-associated disorders, whiplash syndrome

  AUTHOR INFORMATION Section 1 of 11    Click here to go to the next section in this topic
Author Information Introduction Clinical Differentials Workup Treatment Medication Follow-up Miscellaneous Pictures Bibliography

Author: Oregon K Hunter, Jr, MD, Physiatrist, Rehabilitation Medicine, SIMED

Coauthor(s): Michael D Freeman, PhD, DC, MPH, Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University; Co-Medical Director, Multidisciplinary Spinal Diagnostic and Treatment Facility

Oregon K Hunter, Jr, MD, is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Editor(s): Martin K Childers, DO, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Neurology, Wake Forest University Health Services; Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine; Patrick M Foye, MD, Assistant Professor of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Co-Director of Musculoskeletal Fellowship, Co-Director Back Pain Clinic, Director of Coccyx Pain (Tailbone Pain, Coccydynia) Service, UMDNJ, New Jersey Medical School; Kelly L Allen, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Lourdes Regional Rehabilitation Center, Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center; and Consuelo T Lorenzo, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Alegent Health Care, Immanuel Rehabilitation Center

Disclosure


  INTRODUCTION Section 2 of 11   Click here to go to the previous section in this topic Click here to go to the top of this page Click here to go to the next section in this topic
Author Information Introduction Clinical Differentials Workup Treatment Medication Follow-up Miscellaneous Pictures Bibliography

Background: Cervical strain is one of the most common musculoskeletal problems encountered by generalists and neuromusculoskeletal specialists in the clinic.

One cause of cervical strain is termed cervical acceleration-deceleration injury. This is frequently called whiplash injury.

Whiplash is the most common sequela of nonfatal car injuries. Whiplash is one of the most poorly understood disorders of the spine, and the severity of the trauma often is not correlated with the seriousness of the clinical problems (Riley, 1995). A history of neck injury is a significant risk factor for chronic neck pain (Croft, 2001). Pretorque of the head and neck increases facet capsular strains, supporting its role in the whiplash mechanism (Winkelstein, 2000).

The Quebec Taskforce on Whiplash-Associated Disorders has suggested the following system for classifying the severity of cervical sprains (Spitzer, 1995): 0 = no neck pain complaints, no physical signs; 1 = neck pain complaints, only stiffness or tenderness, no other physical signs; 2 = neck complaints and musculoskeletal signs (decreased range of motion [ROM] and point tenderness); 3 = neck complaints and neurologic signs (weakness, sensory and reflex changes); 4 = neck complaints with fracture and/or dislocation.

Pathophysiology:

Relevant anatomy and physiology

Consistent with known biologic models, injury to bony, articular (disks and facets), nerve (including root and spinal cord), and soft tissues of the cervical spine (ligament, tendon, muscle) are the most likely sources of dysfunction and pain. Cervical strain is produced by an overload injury to the muscle-tendon unit because of excessive forces on the cervical spine. The cause is thought to be the elongation and tearing of muscles or ligaments. Secondary edema, hemorrhage, and inflammation may occur.

Many cervical muscles do not terminate in tendons but attach directly to the periosteum. Muscles respond to injury by contracting with recruitment of surrounding muscles in an attempt to splint the injured muscle. Myofascial pain syndrome, which is thought to be the resultant clinical picture, may be a secondary tissue response to disk or facet-joint injury.

Facet capsular ligaments have been shown to contain free (nociceptive) nerve endings, and distending these ligaments by administering facet joint injections has produced whiplash-like pain patterns in healthy individuals. The cervical facet capsular ligaments may be injured under whiplash-like loads of combined shear, bending, and compression forces; this mechanism provides a mechanical basis for injury caused by whiplash loading (Siegmund, 2001).

Chronic pain associated with cervical strains is most likely to affect the zygapophysial (facet) joints, intervertebral disks, and upper cervical ligaments. The C2-3 facet joint is the most common source of referred pain in patients with a dominant complaint of headache (60%). The C5-6 region is the most common source of cervical, axial, and referred arm pain. Cervical facet joint pain is typically unilateral, dull, and aching neck pain with occasional referral into the occiput or interscapular regions. The cervical facet joints can be responsible for a substantial portion of chronic neck pain. The cervical facet joints refer pain overlapping with both myofascial and diskogenic pain patterns.

Neuroanatomic studies reveal that the facet joint is richly innervated and contains free and encapsulated nerve endings. The facet capsule is richly innervated with C fibers and A-delta fibers. Many of these nerves are at a high threshold and likely to indicate pain. Local pressure and capsular stretch can mechanically activate these nerves. These neurons can be sensitized or excited by naturally occurring inflammatory agents, including both substance P and phospholipase A.

Physiologic changes in the spinal cord, particularly the pain complexes of the dorsal horn, implicate excitatory amino acids such as substance P, glutamate, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA), as well as other factors that sensitize the dorsal horn in chronic pain. The mechanism is massive input of noxious stimuli from cervical spine injury (Anderson, 2001).

In lumbar spine studies, inflammatory cytokines are found at high levels in facet joint tissue when a degenerative disorder is present. Facet joints are covered by hyaline cartilage and enclosed with synovium and joint capsules. This basic structure is found throughout the spine and in the joints of the arms and the legs (Igarishi, 2004).

According to Bogduk, results of postmortem studies, biomechanical studies, and clinical studies converge to suggest that the zygapophysial joints are injured in cases of whiplash. Clinical studies have shown that pain in the zygapophysial joint is common in patients with chronic neck pain after whiplash injury (Bogduk, 2002). An overload injury to the muscle-tendon unit produces cervical strain because of excessive forces on the cervical spine. This injury is accompanied by elongation and tearing of muscles or ligaments, secondary edema, hemorrhage, and inflammation. Many cervical muscles attach directly to bone (periosteum), and the muscle response to injury is contraction with recruitment of surrounding muscles to splint the injured muscle.

Classic mechanism of whiplash injury

A collision in any direction can cause chronic whiplash (Ferrari, 2001).

In a clinical review, Barnsley et al described the classic whiplash scenario in which the patient's car was struck from behind (ie, rear ended) (Barnsley, 1993). This type of accident typically occurs in the following manner: At the time of impact, the vehicle suddenly accelerates forward. About 100 ms later, the patient's trunk and shoulders follow, induced by a similar acceleration of the car seat. The patient's head, with no force acting on it, remains static in space. The result is forced extension of the neck, as the shoulders travel anteriorly under the head. With this extension, the inertia of the head is overcome, and the head accelerates forward. The neck then acts as a lever to increase forward acceleration of the head, forcing the neck into flexion. Frontal impact causes middle C2-3 to C4-5 and lower C6-7 and C7-T1 injury (Pearson, 2005). Direct facial impact has shown a flexion motion of the upper or middle cervical spine with extension of the lower cervical spine (Fukushima, 2006).

The forces involved in an impact speed of 20 mph (32 km/h) cause the human head to reach a peak acceleration of 12 G during extension. If the head is in slight rotation, a rear impact forces the head into further rotation before extension, prestressing various cervical structures, such as the capsules of the zygapophysial joints, intervertebral disks, and the alar ligament complex. These structures are thus rendered susceptible to injury. Muscle injury may be less likely after low-velocity impacts with head rotation at the time of impact than they are in other mechanisms (Kumar, 2005).

When a rear impact is offset to the subject's left, it results in not only increased electromyographic activity in both sternocleidomastoids, but also the splenius capitis contralateral to the direction of impact bears part of the force, thus causing injury (Kumar, 2004). Which muscle responds most to a whiplash-type injury is determined by the direction of head rotation. The sternocleidomastoid on the right responds most with the head rotated to the left, and visa versa (Kumar, 2005). Measures to prevent whiplash injury need to account for the symmetric muscle response caused by victims looking to the right or left at the time of collision (Kumar, 2005).

Lower cervical facet joints respond with a shear plus distraction mechanism in the front and shear plus compression in the back. In studies, females were more likely to be injured, suggesting genetic, hormonal, structural, or tolerance differences from males (Stemper, 2004).

Head-turned rear impact also causes significantly greater injury at C0-1 and C5-6 as compared with head-forward rear and frontal impacts. Multiplanar injury that occurred at C5-6 and C6-7 also occurred with head-turned impact (Panjabi, 2006). Head-turned rear impacts up to 8 G do not typically injure the alar, transverse, and apical ligaments (Maak, 2006).

Head-turned impact also causes dynamic cervical intervertebral narrowing indicating potential ganglion compression even in patients with a nonstenotic foramen at C5-6 and C6-7. In patients with stenotic foramen, the risk greatly increases to include C3-4 through C6-7 (Tominaga, 2006).

A rear-end collision is most likely to injure the lower cervical spine, with intervertebral hyperextension at a peak acceleration of 5 G and above (Ito, 2004). The first substantial increase in intervertebral flexibility occurs at C56 following 5 G acceleration. At accelerations faster than this, the injuries spread to the surrounding levels (C4-5 to C4-T1). The 2 injury phases during whiplash are (1) hyperextension at C5-6 and C6-7, and mild flexion at C0-4 and (2) hyperextension of the entire cervical spine (Tropiano, 2004).

An instantaneous change occurs in the pivot point at C5-6, causing a jamming effect of the inferior facet of C5 on the superior facet of C6 (Anderson, 2001). The nonphysiologic kinematic responses that occur during a whiplash impact may induce stresses in upper cervical neural structures or in lower facet joints. The result may be compromise sufficient to elicit neuropathic or nociceptive pain (Cusick, 2001).

The muscular component of the head-neck complex plays a central role in the abatement of higher acceleration levels, it may be a primary site of injury in the whiplash phenomenon. Muscle responses are greater with faster accelerations than with slower ones (Kumar, 2002).

The risk of whiplash injury in motor vehicle collisions increases when subjects are surprised and unprepared for the impact (Siegmund, 2003).

One of the most important studies of cervical spine injury is of a case series of roller coaster injuries. The roller coaster studies have shown a peak of 4.5-5 G of vertical or axial acceleration and 1.5 G of lateral acceleration over approximately 100 ms on both. During the 19-month study period, 656 neck and back injuries were studied. The injuries included disk herniations, bulges, and compression fractures. The results of the study suggest that a minimum threshold of significant spine injury is not established. The greatest explanation for injury from traumatic loading of the spine was thought to be individual susceptibility to injury, which is an unpredictable variable (Freeman, 2005).

Complications

Cervical myeloradiculopathy is a complication of flexion/extension injuries in patients with underlying spondylosis. Cervical disks may become painful as part of the degenerative process, as a result of repetitive microtrauma or a single excessive load. Pain due to a disk injury may result from annular tears with inflammation or compression of the local nervous or vascular tissue.

Cord compression after whiplash due to physiologic extension loading is not likely. However, individuals with a narrow spinal canal have an increased risk of injury to the spinal cord that results in quadriparesis (Ino, 2004).

Postmortem studies have shown that ligamentous injuries are common after whiplash injuries, but disk herniation is a rare event (Mercer, 1999).

In 1 study, 33% of patients with whiplash injury had disk herniations with medullary or dura impingement over 2-year follow-up after injury (Pettersson, 1997).

In another study, whiplash-type distortions are associated with a 16% incidence of diskoligamentous injuries. On MRI, most patients with severe persisting radiating pain had large disk protrusions that were confirmed as herniations at surgery. Neck and radiating pain were alleviated with early disk excision and fusion (Jonsson, 1994).

Strain or tears of the anterior annulus and the alar portions of the posterior longitudinal ligament (when stretched by a bulging disk) are possible causes for diskogenic pain after whiplash injury. Injuries of the zygapophysial joint found in clinical and cadaveric studies include fracture, bleeding, rupture or tear of the joint capsule, fracture of the subchondral plate, contusion of the intra-articular meniscus, and fracture of the articular surface (Barnsley, 1994).

Upper cervical disk protrusions as a result of cervical strain injury may result in nonspecific and shoulder pain. Motor weakness or reflex or sensory abnormalities may be limited or nonspecific. Radiculopathy is more likely than cord signs.

MRI or CT myelography are necessary for the diagnosis (Chen, 2000).

Frequency:

  • In the US: Almost 85% of all neck pain is thought to result from acute or repetitive neck injuries or from chronic stresses and strain. Dreyer and Boden showed that, in the general population, the 1-year prevalence rate for neck and shoulder pain is 16-18% (Dreyer, 1998).

    Estimates indicate that more than 1 million whiplash injuries occur each year due to automobile accidents. Barnsley et al estimate that the annual incidence of symptoms due to whiplash injury is 3.8 cases per 1000 population (Barnsley, 1994). Freeman et al cautiously estimate that 6.2% of the US population, or 15.5 million individuals, have late whiplash syndrome (Freeman, 1999).

  • Internationally: The annual incidence in Switzerland is 0.44 cases per 1000 population. In Norway, a rate of 2 cases per 1000 population has been reported. The approximate annual incidence in Western countries is 1 case per 1000 population.

Mortality/Morbidity:

  • Mortality is rare unless severe trauma causes the cervical strain, with associated brain or spinal cord trauma, respiratory compromise, or vascular injury.
  • Morbidity includes cervical pain syndromes with associated symptoms. Disability in acute or chronic cervical strains is also responsible for significant socioeconomic costs.
  • Low-energy collisions occurring at less than 6-9 mph (9.7-14.5 km/h) are thought to be unlikely to produce significant neck trauma.

Sex: Chronic neck pain, regardless of its cause, is identified in 9.5% of men and 13.5% of women.

Age: The average age of patients with a whiplash injury is the late fourth decade.


  CLINICAL Section 3 of 11   Click here to go to the previous section in this topic Click here to go to the top of this page Click here to go to the next section in this topic
Author Information Introduction Clinical Differentials Workup Treatment Medication Follow-up Miscellaneous Pictures Bibliography

History: The most common symptoms of cervical disorders are suboccipital headache, ongoing or motion-induced neck pain, or both. Other symptoms associated with cervical strain include the following:

  • Neck pain
    • At the time of accident, neck pain may be minimal, with an onset of symptoms during the subsequent 12-72 hours.
    • Nonspecific neck and shoulder pain (a variety of cervical radiculopathies) may indicate an injury to a disk in the upper cervical spine (Chen, 2000).
  • Headache
    • Headache is a frequent symptom of cervical strain.

    • Neck structures play a role in the pathophysiology of some headaches, but the clinical patterns have not been defined adequately.

    • Increased muscle hardness (determined by palpation) is significantly increased in patients with chronic tension-type headaches.

    • Facet joints and intervertebral disk damage have been implicated in the pathology of headaches due to neck injury (Anderson, 2001).

    • No specific pathology on imaging or diagnostic studies has been correlated with cervicogenic headaches (Heldeman, 2001).
  • Shoulder, scapular, and/or arm pain
  • Visual disturbances (eg, blurred vision, diplopia)
  • Tinnitus
  • Dizziness: This may result from injury to facet joints that are supplied with proprioceptive fibers that when injured can cause confused vestibular and visual input to the brain (Anderson, 2001).
  • Concussion
  • Neurologic symptoms: These may include weakness or heaviness in the arms, numbness, and paresthesia.
  • Difficulty sleeping due to pain
  • Disturbed concentration and memory
    • Late whiplash syndrome includes symptoms such as headache, vertigo, disturbances in concentration and memory, difficulty swallowing, and impaired vision. These cognitive impairments remain poorly understood.
    • Many patients with these changes have abnormal results on single photon emission CT (SPECT) scans or P300 event-related potentials (Lorberboym, 2002).
    • Bladder or bowel dysfunction: These may be symptoms of complication of myelopathy (spinal cord involvement).

Physical: The physical examination is a vital part of the diagnosis of cervical stress and strain injuries. Various signs and symptoms may be noted during the physical examination.

  • Observation of the patient's general appearance: This may yield information about pain behavior, verbal or nonverbal.
  • Spinal examination
    • During the postural assessment, the clinician may note the following findings: stiffness of the neck, forward head, flexed neck, rounded shoulders, asymmetry of the neck or shoulders, neck tilt or rotation, and 1 shoulder higher or tighter than the other.

    • Palpation may reveal rigidity (loss of motion or postural abnormality), spasm tightness, muscle hardness, crepitation, swelling, enlargement of joints, tenderness, tender points, and trigger points. Palpation of the zygapophysial joints may be helpful in determining the painful joints either because of osteoarthritis or posttraumatic irritation of the joint capsule.

    • ROM: Decreased active and passive ROM may be noted. Impaired cervical ROM (particularly in the sagittal plane) is useful in distinguishing between asymptomatic persons and those with persistent whiplash-associated disorders (Dall'Alba, 2001). Special methodology for measuring cervical ROM compared chronic whiplash and healthy subjects. Using mean coefficient of variation (MCV) and total cervical range of motion (TCROM), the TCROM was significantly lower and the MCV was significantly higher in injured patients as compared with healthy individuals (Prushansky, 2006).

    • After acute whiplash injury, neck mobility is significantly reduced, but mobility is similar between patients with whiplash injury and in control subjects after 3 months (Kasch, 2001).

    • Special maneuvers: Cervical neurocompression may cause parascapular or arm pain by narrowing the neural foramen (causing nerve root compression) or by causing pressure on the facet joints.
  • Neurologic examination
    • Mental status: Mood disturbance, such as anxiety or depressive affect, may be noted.
    • Motor function: If cervical radiculopathy is present, the strength or bulk of the upper extremities may be decreased. If myelopathy is present, weakness of upper and lower extremities may be noted.
    • Circumference: The dominant arm and forearm is usually slightly larger than the nondominant side.
    • Reflexes: In cervical radiculopathy, muscle stretch reflexes (MSRs) may be decreased in a myotomal pattern in the affected upper limb; however, they should remain normal in the lower limbs. By contrast, in cervical myelopathy (cervical spinal cord involvement), the MSRs arising from a given level of the cord may be decreased in the upper limbs; however, MSRs in the lower limbs may be increased, with spasticity of the lower extremities, a positive Babinski sign, and a positive Hoffman sign.
    • Sensation: If cervical radiculopathy is present, pain or 2-point discrimination of light tough may be reduced in a radicular pattern in the upper extremities.
    • Coordination: With radiculopathy or myelopathy, coordination may be decreased in the involved upper extremity.
    • Gait: In cases of cervical myelopathy, the patient's gait pattern may be abnormal as a result of spasticity. The presence of spasticity implies an upper motor neuron dysfunction, in contrast to injury to the peripheral nerves.
    • Provocative maneuvers: The Spurling test uses cervical extension and lateral bending while the examiner applies a downward axial load). This test may provoke (reduce) radicular symptoms in a patient with cervical radiculopathy.

Causes:

  • Common traumatic events or factors that may lead to cervical strain/sprain injuries include motor vehicle accidents, lifting or pulling heavy objects, awkward sleeping positions, unusual upper-extremity work, and prolonged static positions.
  • Flexion/extension injuries may precipitate a myeloradiculopathic presentation in a patient with cervical spondylosis. Nerve root or spinal cord compression may occur from neural ischemia due to the preexisting stenosis that accompanies cervical spondylosis. Flexion-extension injuries, blows to the head, or neck injury while lifting heavy objects may precipitate an acute exacerbation of cervical spondylosis.
  • Repetitive or abnormal postures may contribute to cervical sprains and strains.
  DIFFERENTIALS Section 4 of 11   Click here to go to the previous section in this topic Click here to go to the top of this page Click here to go to the next section in this topic
Author Information Introduction Clinical Differentials Workup Treatment Medication Follow-up Miscellaneous Pictures Bibliography

Traumatic Brain Injury: Definition, Epidemiology, Pathophysiology


Other Problems to be Considered:

Cervical herniated disk
Cervical myelopathy
Cervical osteoarthritis
Cervical radiculopathy
Factitious disorder
Infection or osteomyelitis
Inflammatory rheumatologic disease
Malingering
Polymyalgia rheumatica
Psychogenic pain disorder
Referred pain from cardiothoracic structures
Tumor or malignancy of cervical spine
Vascular abnormality of cervical structures

Quick Find
Author Information
Introduction
Clinical
Differentials
Workup
Treatment
Medication
Follow-up
Miscellaneous
Pictures
Bibliography

Click for related images.

Related Articles
Traumatic Brain Injury: Definition, Epidemiology, Pathophysiology


Patient Education



  WORKUP Section 5 of 11   Click here to go to the previous section in this topic Click here to go to the top of this page Click here to go to the next section in this topic
Author Information Introduction Clinical Differentials Workup Treatment Medication Follow-up Miscellaneous Pictures Bibliography

Lab Studies:

  • CBC count with differential, if infection or tumor is a concern
  • An arthritis profile, including a determination of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), if inflammatory arthritis or polymyalgia rheumatica is suggested

Imaging Studies:

  • Although not pathognomonic for sprain/strain, imaging results are important for excluding other diagnoses and more-extensive injuries.
    • Motor vehicle crashes causing fatalities may also result in occult pathoanatomic lesions in the cervical intervertebral disk and zygapophysial joints. Present imaging methods do not depict these subtle lesions; hence, underreporting of pathoanatomic lesions during standard autopsy is probably common.
    • These findings may have clinical relevance in the management of road traffic trauma survivors with potentially similar pathoanatomy (Uhrenholt, 2002).
  • Radiography is useful in the evaluation of cervical sprain and strain.
    • Only lateral views are needed for the initial screening of stability. Three views are obtained for the basic evaluation: anteroposterior (AP), lateral, and odontoid views. Five views, including the 3 basic views plus bilateral oblique views, are used to evaluate the intervertebral foramen.
    • Flexion/extension views may be obtained if instability is suggested. Hypermobility in the lower cervical segments in 12 out of 34 patients with chronic whiplash-associated disorders were identified by a new measurement protocol determining rotational and translational motions of segments C34 and C56 (Kristjansson, 2003).
    • Order radiographic studies early in any of the following cases: when significant trauma, pain, or dysfunction develops; when a chronic condition develops; or when documentation of the patient's condition is required if litigation is anticipated.
    • Radiographs of the cervical spine may show straightening or reversal of the normal lordotic curve. This finding is thought to represent spasm, guarding, or splinting of the muscles that stabilize the neck. Although these findings may be found in as many as 20% of healthy control subjects, the rates are higher in the injured population (Malanga, 2002).
  • Overall, MRI is the best noninvasive and detailed imaging study for evaluating the status of the disks and spinal cord.
    • Order MRI if detailed analysis of spinal structures (eg, spinal cord, disk) is indicated, for example, in an evaluation for underlying herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP).
    • A relative number of abnormal findings on cervical spine MRI can be found in asymptomatic individuals. According to Matsumoto et al, the most common findings involved disk degeneration, but nearly 10% of patients can have asymptomatic spinal cord compression (Matsumoto, 1998).
    • Lateral disk protrusions are rarely found in asymptomatic patients, who usually present with concordant radiculopathy.
    • Extruded disks are not seen in asymptomatic patients. When seen in the cervical spine, they are almost invariably associated with the patient's symptoms.
    • A clearly defined extrusion, when arising from a normally hydrated disk with no osseous ridging and when compressing an appropriate nerve root concordant with the patient's symptoms, can be considered with confidence to be acute or subacute.
    • MRI is indicated in patients with persistent arm pain, neurologic deficits, or clinical signs of nerve root compression.

    • MRI is unable to reliably depict sources of cervical diskogenic pain because significant annular tears often escape MRI detection (Anderson, 2001).
  • CT scanning may be performed if detailed bony imaging is indicated, such as when a fracture or instability is a concern. CT may be used as an alternative to MRI in patients with claustrophobia, though disk imaging with CT offers low resolution.
  • Myelography and CT are invasive imaging studies that may be useful for a detailed analysis if plain CT and MRI do not provide a definitive answer regarding the suspected pathology.

    • The degree of concordance between CT myelography and MRI is only moderately good; discrepancies are noted especially in the differentiation of disk and bony pathology.

    • A disadvantage is that lumbar puncture is required.
  • Bone scanning is indicated if a spinal tumor, infection, or occult fracture is suggested.
  • Videofluoroscopy is a controversial study used to evaluate increased, decreased, or abnormal segmental movement of the cervical spine.

    • In a study by Hino et al, motion patterns were different between normal spines and pathologic spines (Hino, 1999).

    • Cineradiograms allow the identification of soft tissue injuries and early subluxations of the cervical spine that may not be identified on static radiography or physical examination (Buonocore, 1966).
  • Diskography is considered a presurgical evaluation used to identify the level on which to operate. Significant tears are often missed with MRI, but diskography can reveal a diskogenic source of cervical pain. Although MRI can identify most of the painful disks, it has a relatively high false-negative and false-positive rate. Diskography can direct a surgeon in making critical management decisions (Zheng, 2004).

Other Tests:

  • Electrodiagnostic studies
    • These physiologic studies may show nerve injury (as opposed to imaging studies, which may show only structural injury).
  • Electromyography
    • Electromyographic (EMG) studies can be used to determine if radiculopathy is a factor in the patient's symptoms.
    • EMG is usually performed after 1-2 weeks (or longer), when the physiologic changes are first found.
    • In patients with acute radiculopathy, EMG findings include increased insertional activity, fibrillation potentials, positive sharp waves, and complex repetitive discharges.
    • Chronic radiculopathy findings are noted after a few months of nerve root involvement and include polyphasic or broad-duration/large-amplitude motor units, drop out of motor units, decreased recruitment, and an incomplete interference pattern.
    • Findings in the posterior primary division of the nerve root are noted in the cervical paraspinous muscles.
    • The anterior primary division of the nerve root findings is noted in the specific root-innervated muscles of the upper extremity.
    • The accessory spinal nerve innervates the trapezius muscle, which is often a source of chronic neck pain due to spasm. Contribution from the C2-C4 motor roots is minimal and inconsistent. EMG recordings from the trapezius muscle can show dysfunction of the spinal motor nerve root (Leppanen, 2003).
    • When EMG findings of radiculopathy are interpreted, the duration of the symptoms should not influence the diagnosis (Pezzin, 1999).
  • Nerve conduction studies
    • In some cases, nerve conduction study (NCS) may be performed by an appropriately trained and supervised technician.
    • These tests should be interpreted by a board certified electrodiagnostic medicine specialist only with the entire clinical picture in mind.
    • NCS is indicated if a concomitant peripheral nerve involvement is suspected and needs to be evaluated, for example, when numbness of the radial aspect of the upper extremity is a symptom or carpal tunnel syndrome versus C6 radiculopathy needs to be identified.
  TREATMENT Section 6 of 11   Click here to go to the previous section in this topic Click here to go to the top of this page Click here to go to the next section in this topic
Author Information Introduction Clinical Differentials Workup Treatment Medication Follow-up Miscellaneous Pictures Bibliography

Rehabilitation Program:

  • Physical Therapy: Early rehabilitation helps to prevent chronic pain and disability. Passive modalities include the application of heat, ice, electrical stimulation, massage, myofascial release, and traction. Passive modalities are often used to decrease pain or inflammation and to facilitate participation in an active rehabilitation program, which often involves stretching and strengthening. Extended use of passive modalities without a more active program is generally inappropriate.

    Active treatment refers to therapeutic exercises that are aimed at improving the patient's strength, endurance, flexibility, posture, and body mechanics. The goal is to obtain an independent home program or community fitness program at the conclusion of formal physical therapy. The typical therapy prescription is recommended 3 times per week for 4-8 weeks.

    Scientific evidence for the physiotherapeutic management of whiplash is sparse. An early active strategy is recommended to improve functions, increase activity, and prevent chronicity (Scholten-Peeters, 2002). In patients with whiplash-associated disorders caused by a motor vehicle collision, treatment with frequently repeated active submaximal movements combined with mechanical diagnosis and therapy is more effective in reducing pain than a standard program of initial rest, use of a soft collar, and gradual self-mobilization (Rosenfeld, 2000).

    In patients with whiplash-associated disorders, active intervention is more effective than standard intervention in reducing pain intensity and sick leave, and in retaining/regaining total ROM. Appropriately trained healthcare professionals can start and support active intervention (frequently repeated active cervical rotation followed [if needed] by assessment and intervention according to the McKenzie protocol) can be as home exercises (Rosenfeld, 2003). Both strength and endurance training for 12 months are effective for decreasing pain and disability in women with chronic, nonspecific neck pain. Stretching and fitness training are commonly advised for patients with chronic neck pain, but stretching and aerobic exercising alone are less effective than strength training (Ylinen, 2003).

    Specific neck exercises for the management of chronic neck pain, including active activation of the deep neck muscles and dynamic strengthening, may significantly improve disability scores (Chiu, 2005). Consistent evidence (from 2 randomized controlled trials) supports mobilization as an effective noninvasive intervention for acute whiplash-associated disorders (Conlin, 2005).

    In examining the costs and consequences of 2 types of intervention after whiplash trauma in automobile crashes, active intervention using physical therapy was found to be less costly and more effective than short-term immobilization using a cervical collar followed by a gradual self-exercise program taught by a leaflet (Rosenfeld, 2006).

  • Occupational Therapy: Occupational therapy (OT) may be indicated unless a concurrent problem involves a distal upper-extremity function or ergonomic factors in causation. A workstation ergonomic evaluation may be indicated if biomechanical stresses of work activity are factors in the causation or exacerbation of the condition.

    The degree of neck pain or dysfunction can be evaluated by using standardized scales. The choice of a scale should be tailored according to the target population and purpose of evaluation. The Neck Disability Index is useful for evaluating groups of patients and the Patient Specific Scale for assessing individual patients (Pietrobon, 2002).

Medical Issues/Complications:
  • Pain complaints may escalate during the rehabilitation program.
  • Pain must be treated aggressively and appropriately.
  • Underlying medical conditions may need to be evaluated and treated to facilitate rehabilitation.
  • The goal of therapy is functional rehabilitation and restoration with an emphasis on improving the patient's strength, endurance, and flexibility.
  • When the patient reaches a plateau, as determined by using objective measurements, therapy progresses to an independent home program or a community fitness program.

Surgical Intervention:

  • Cervical strain without myeloradiculopathy or instability is not a condition requiring surgical intervention.
  • Cervical myeloradiculopathy or instability, a possible complication of the cervical strain, may require surgical intervention (eg, fusion).
  • According to Sampath et al, cervical radiculopathy has a better outcome with surgical intervention than with medical treatment. However, in clinical practice, many physicians believe that most patients respond well to nonsurgical treatment (Sampath, 1999).
  • In one study of patients with cervical spondylotic radiculomyelopathy, the short-term effects of surgery (eg, pain, weakness, sensory loss) were superior. However, at 1 year, no significant differences between surgical and nonsurgical treated groups were found (Fouyas, 2002).

  • Severe sprains of the cervical spine may result in a traumatic rupture of the intervertebral disk and ligaments, leading to a significant kyphotic deformity if not surgically treated (Laporte, 1999).

Consultations:

  • Surgical consultation with a neurosurgeon or orthopedic spinal surgeon may be appropriate if surgical intervention is being considered.
  • Psychological or psychiatric consultation may be indicated if secondary depression, anxiety, or adjustment disorder needs evaluation and treatment.
    • Patients who achieve complete relief from chronic neck pain resolve all of their psychological distress. Patients with persistent neck pain also have persistent anxiety, depression, and other forms of psychological distress.
    • Findings from a study of patients with whiplash-associated disorders suggest that psychosocial problems of these patients are more pronounced than their physical problems. Coping strategies seem to be a significant predictor of psychological well-being (Soderlund, 1999).
  • A functional capacity evaluation (FCE) may be required if objective evaluation of the level of ability/disability needs to be documented for litigation or for determining the patient's readiness to return to work.

    The degree of neck pain or dysfunction can be evaluated by using standardized scales. The choice of a scale should be tailored according to the target population and purpose of evaluation. The Neck Disability Index is useful for evaluating groups of patients and the Patient Specific Scale for assessing individual patients (Pietrobon, 2002).

Other Treatment (injection, manipulation, etc.): Upon review of several randomized controlled trials and epidemiologic studies published since 1993 on medical and surgical interventions, moderate evidence exists in support of radiofrequency neurotomy. Evidence for steroid injections, botulinum treatments, and cervical diskectomy is conflicting or unclear (Conlin, 2005).

  • Injection may be indicated for patients with chronic, persistent neck pain. Injection is indicated for severe neck pain with functional impairment, particularly cervical radiculopathy.
    • An anesthesiologist, interventional physiatrist, neuroradiologist, or other appropriately trained pain specialist may perform the injection.

    • Types of injection include epidural, selective nerve root, or facet block injections.

    • Intra-muscular injections of lidocaine for chronic mechanical neck disorders (MNDs) and intravenous injections of methylprednisolone for acute whiplash are effective. Evidence of the effectiveness of epidural injections of methylprednisolone and lidocaine for chronic MND with radicular findings is limited (Peloso, 2005).

  • Percutaneous radiofrequency neurotomy of medial branch nerve to facet joint is effective for chronic neck pain due to cervical zygapophysial joint pain.

    • In 1 study of the efficacy of radiofrequency medial branch neurotomy to treat cervical zygapophysial joint pain from whiplash injury, the potential for secondary gain did not influence the response to treatment (Sapir, 2001).

    • Using cervical zygapophysial joint pain as a model of chronic pain, investigators studied the effect of percutaneous radiofrequency neurotomy. In all patients who achieved complete pain relief, their preoperative psychological distress also resolved (Wallis, 1996).

  • Whiplash-associated headache pain may be reduced with the injection of botulinum toxin A in cervical trigger points (Freund, 2000). Moderate evidence showed that intramuscular injections of BOTOX® A for chronic MND were no better than saline injections (Gross, 2005).

  • Traction may be helpful.
    • A physical therapist can provide a trial of manual and/or mechanical cervical traction within the clinic. If patients achieve positive results, the physical therapist then may offer instruction in the use of a home overhead cervical traction unit, which must be prescribed by the physician.
    • A home cervical traction unit is most useful for patients with cervical radiculopathy.
  • Manipulation or manual therapy may offer some benefit in patients with acute or chronic neck pain (Hurwitz, 1996).

    • This therapy may be provided by an osteopathic physician (DO), a chiropractic physician (DC), or an allopathic physician (MD) with appropriate training (Hurwitz, 1996).

    • According to a study by the RAND Institute, the estimated rate of complication as a result of cervical manipulative procedures is 1 case per 1 million manipulations (RAND Institute, 1996).

  • Acupuncture may be beneficial for pain control and should be conducted by an appropriately trained and certified provider.
  • Bracing with a soft cervical collar may provide symptomatic relief. The collar does not immobilize the spine; it only reminds the patient not to move his or her neck. If use of a soft cervical collar is prolonged, it may result in worsening of strength, flexibility, and function.

  MEDICATION Section 7 of 11   Click here to go to the previous section in this topic Click here to go to the top of this page Click here to go to the next section in this topic
Author Information Introduction Clinical Differentials Workup Treatment Medication Follow-up Miscellaneous Pictures Bibliography

Early and appropriate treatment with analgesics for pain relief, with anti-inflammatory agents for inflammation, with muscle relaxants for spasms, and with aids for sleep disturbance are the mainstay pharmaceutical agents for cervical sprain/strain injuries.

Drug Category: Nonopioid analgesics -- Pain control is essential to high-quality patient care. Nonnarcotic analgesics ensure patient comfort and promote pulmonary toilet. These medications have sedating properties, which are beneficial for patients who have traumatic injuries.
Drug Name
Acetaminophen (Tylenol, Panadol, Aspirin-Free Anacin) -- DOC for treatment of pain in patients with documented hypersensitivity to aspirin, NSAIDs, or upper GI disease or in those taking oral anticoagulants.
Adult Dose2 500-mg tab PO qid
Pediatric Dose<12 years: 10-15 mg/kg/dose PO q4-6h prn; not to exceed 2.6 g/d
>12 years: 325-650 mg PO q4h; not to exceed 5 doses in 24 h
ContraindicationsDocumented hypersensitivity
InteractionsRifampin can reduce analgesic effects; coadministration with barbiturates, carbamazepine, hydantoins, and isoniazid may increase hepatotoxicity
Pregnancy B - Usually safe but benefits must outweigh the risks.
PrecautionsHepatotoxicity can occur in patients with chronic alcoholism, with various dose levels of acetaminophen; severe or recurrent pain or high or continued fever may indicate serious illness
Drug Category: Opioid analgesics -- These agents are indicated for the medical treatment of moderate to severe pain.
Drug Name
Hydrocodone/acetaminophen (Lortab) -- For relief of moderate to severe pain. Dose available with 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10 mg of hydrocodone. Total daily dose of acetaminophen should be considered; not to exceed 4 g/d. Individualize dose from qd to q4h, depending on degree of pain, effect of pain on patient's lifestyle, and need to keep blood levels of analgesic at therapeutic dose consistently or only intermittently.
Adult Dose1-2 tab or cap PO q4-6h prn
Pediatric DoseDo not exceed the following doses of hydrocodone bitartrate:
<2 years: 1.25 mg PO q4-6h prn
2-12 years: 5 mg PO q4-6h prn
>12 years: 10 mg PO q4-6h prn
ContraindicationsDocumented hypersensitivity
InteractionsPhenothiazines may decrease analgesic effects; toxicity can increase with concurrent CNS depressants or tricyclic antidepressants
Pregnancy C - Safety for use during pregnancy has not been established.
PrecautionsTablets contain metabisulfite, which may cause hypersensitivity; caution in patients dependent on opiates (substitution may result in acute opiate-withdrawal symptoms); caution in severe renal or hepatic dysfunction; alcohol intake may result in excessive sedation or liver toxicity; dependency may occur with use of hydrocodone
Drug Category: Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors -- Although increased cost can be a negative factor, the incidence of costly and potentially fatal GI bleeds is clearly less with COX-2 inhibitors than with traditional NSAIDs. Ongoing analysis of cost avoidance of GI bleeds will further define the populations for whom COX-2 inhibitors are most beneficial.
Drug Name
Celecoxib (Celebrex) -- COX-1 important for platelet aggregation, regulation of blood flow in kidney and stomach, and regulation of gastric acid secretion. Inhibition of COX-1 may contribute to NSAID GI toxicity. COX-2 considered an inducible isoenzyme, induced during pain and inflammatory stimuli. Celecoxib inhibits primarily COX-2. At therapeutic concentrations, COX-1 isoenzyme not inhibited; thus, GI toxicity may be decreased. Seek the lowest dose for each patient.
Adult Dose200 mg PO bid
Pediatric DoseNot established
ContraindicationsDocumented hypersensitivity to sulfonamides
InteractionsCoadministration with fluconazole may increase plasma concentrations because of inhibition of celecoxib metabolism; coadministration with rifampin may decrease celecoxib plasma concentrations
Pregnancy C - Safety for use during pregnancy has not been established.
PrecautionsMay cause fluid retention and peripheral edema; caution in compromised cardiac function, hypertension, conditions predisposing patient to fluid retention; severe heart failure and hyponatremia, because may deteriorate circulatory hemodynamics; NSAIDs may mask usual signs of infection; caution in existing controlled infections; evaluate symptoms and signs suggesting liver dysfunction or abnormal liver laboratory results
Drug Category: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents -- These agents have analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and antipyretic activities. Their mechanism of action is not known, but they may inhibit cyclooxygenase activity and prostaglandin synthesis. Other mechanisms may exist as well; these include inhibition of leukotriene synthesis, lysosomal enzyme release, lipoxygenase activity, neutrophil aggregation and various cell-membrane functions.
Drug Name
Nabumetone (Relafen) -- Nonacidic NSAID rapidly metabolized after absorption to a major active metabolite that inhibits cyclooxygenase enzyme, which in turn inhibits inflammation.
Adult Dose1000-2000 mg PO qd
Pediatric DoseNot established
ContraindicationsDocumented hypersensitivity; active peptic ulcer disease, hepatic impairment
InteractionsProbenecid may increase toxicity of NSAIDs; coadministration with ibuprofen may decrease effects of loop diuretics; coadministration with anticoagulants may prolong PT (watch for signs of bleeding); NSAIDs may increase serum lithium levels and risk of methotrexate toxicity (eg, stomatitis, bone marrow suppression, nephrotoxicity)
Pregnancy C - Safety for use during pregnancy has not been established.
PrecautionsElderly patients may require decreased doses; caution in hepatic and renal impairment
Drug Category: Muscle relaxants -- These medications are indicated for the relaxation of increased muscle tone, spasm, and rigidity associated with cervical strain syndromes.
Drug Name
Tizanidine (Zanaflex) -- Indicated for treating muscle spasm in patients with cervical strain. Centrally acting muscle relaxant metabolized in liver and excreted in urine and feces.
Adult Dose2-8 mg PO tid; may give in small dose at night, eg, 2-4 mg, to help decrease spasms that interfere with sleep
Pediatric DoseNot established
ContraindicationsDocumented hypersensitivity
InteractionsMay interact with alcohol (increase somnolence, stupor) and oral contraceptives (which decrease its clearance); can cause increased hypotensive effects with concurrent diuretics
Pregnancy C - Safety for use during pregnancy has not been established.
PrecautionsCaution in renal impairment
Drug Name
Carisoprodol (Soma) -- Short-acting medication that may have depressant effects at the spinal cord level.
Adult Dose350 mg PO tid/qid
Pediatric DoseNot established
ContraindicationsDocumented hypersensitivity; acute intermittent porphyria
InteractionsIncreases toxicity of alcohol, CNS depressants, MAOIs, clindamycin, phenothiazine
Pregnancy C - Safety for use during pregnancy has not been established.
PrecautionsCaution in renal and hepatic impairment
Drug Name
Cyclobenzaprine (Flexeril) -- Skeletal muscle relaxant that acts centrally and reduces motor activity of tonic somatic origins, influencing both alpha and gamma motor neurons. Structurally related to tricyclic antidepressants and thus has some of their disadvantages.
Adult Dose20-40 mg/d PO divided bid/qid; not to exceed 60 mg/d
Pediatric DoseNot established
ContraindicationsDocumented hypersensitivity; patients who have taken MAOIs within last 14 d
InteractionsCoadministration with MAOIs and tricyclic antidepressants may increase toxicity; may have additive effect with concurrent anticholinergics; may enhance effects of alcohol, CNS depressants, and barbiturates
Pregnancy C - Safety for use during pregnancy has not been established.
PrecautionsCaution in patients with angle-closure glaucoma, and urinary hesitance
Drug Name
Methocarbamol (Robaxin) -- Reduces nerve impulse transmission from spinal cord to skeletal muscle.
Adult Dose1.5 g PO qid for 2-3 d and decrease to 4-4.5 g/d in 3-6 divided doses
Pediatric DoseNot established
ContraindicationsDocumented hypersensitivity; renal impairment
InteractionsIncreases toxicity of CNS depressants
Pregnancy C - Safety for use during pregnancy has not been established.
PrecautionsCaution in patients with history of seizures
Drug Category: Tricyclic antidepressants -- Disturbed sleep is often a significant symptom with cervical strain. If analgesics and muscle relaxants do not provide enough relief, medications such as low-dose antidepressants can be used. These agents have central and peripheral anticholinergic effects, as well as sedative effects.
Drug Name
Amitriptyline (Elavil) -- Analgesic for certain types of chronic and neuropathic pain.
Adult Dose10-40 mg PO qhs (50-150 mg may be necessary in some individuals)
Pediatric DoseChildren: 0.1 mg/kg PO qhs; increase, as tolerated, over 2-3 wk to 0.5-2 mg/d qhs
Adolescents: 25-50 mg/d PO initially; increase gradually to 100 mg/d in divided doses
ContraindicationsDocumented hypersensitivity; use of MAOIs in past 14 d; history of seizures, cardiac arrhythmias, glaucoma, or urinary retention; acute recovery phase after MI; prostate enlargement with urinary retention
InteractionsPhenobarbital may decrease effects; coadministration with inhibitors of CYP2D6 enzyme system (eg, cimetidine, quinidine) may increase levels; inhibits hypotensive effects of guanethidine; may interact with thyroid medications, alcohol, CNS depressants, barbiturates, and disulfiram
Pregnancy C - Safety for use during pregnancy has not been established.
PrecautionsCaution in elderly patients with cardiac disease, arrhythmias, urinary retention (particularly due to prostate enlargement), angle-closure glaucoma; history of hyperthyroidism, and renal or hepatic impairment
Drug Category: Corticosteroids -- These agents are used for severe inflammation (eg, radiculopathy) due to release of inflammatory chemicals from disk injury. These agents have anti-inflammatory properties and cause profound and varied metabolic effects. In addition, they modify the body's immune response to diverse stimuli.
Drug Name
Methylprednisolone (Solu-Medrol, Depo-Medrol) -- Indicated for treatment of severe pain and/or radiculopathy if inflammation is suspected.
Adult Dose2-60 mg/d PO in 1-4 divided doses followed by gradual reduction to lowest level that can maintain clinical response
Pediatric DoseLoading dose: 2 mg/kg IV
Maintenance dose: 0.5-1 mg/kg/dose IV q6h for up to 5 d
ContraindicationsDocumented hypersensitivity; viral, fungal or tubercular skin infections; labile diabetes, uncontrolled or severe hypertension, and active or recurrent PUD or gastritis
InteractionsCoadministration with digoxin may increase digitalis toxicity secondary to hypokalemia; estrogens may increase levels; phenobarbital, phenytoin, and rifampin may decrease levels (adjust dose); monitor for hypokalemia when used with concurrent diuretics
Pregnancy C - Safety for use during pregnancy has not been established.
PrecautionsHyperglycemia, edema, osteonecrosis, peptic ulcer disease, hypokalemia, osteoporosis, euphoria, psychosis, growth suppression, myopathy, and infections are possible complications
  FOLLOW-UP Section 8 of 11   Click here to go to the previous section in this topic Click here to go to the top of this page Click here to go to the next section in this topic
Author Information Introduction Clinical Differentials Workup Treatment Medication Follow-up Miscellaneous Pictures Bibliography

Further Outpatient Care:

In/Out Patient Meds:

Transfer:

Deterrence/Prevention:

Complications:

Prognosis:

Patient Education:

  • Patient education in self-care is important in preventing dependence on healthcare providers, as well as in preventing excessive disability.
  • A physical therapist can teach patients with chronic cervical strains how to use proper postural and body mechanics.
  MISCELLANEOUS Section 9 of 11   Click here to go to the previous section in this topic Click here to go to the top of this page Click here to go to the next section in this topic
Author Information Introduction Clinical Differentials Workup Treatment Medication Follow-up Miscellaneous Pictures Bibliography

Medical/Legal Pitfalls:

  • The failure to evaluate completely the integrity and stability of the cervical spine with appropriate imaging studies when indicated by the clinical picture is a pitfall.
  • The failure to document adequately an appropriate neurologic examination to confirm the presence or absence of radiculopathy and/or myelopathy is another pitfall.
  • The term whiplash should generally be avoided when possible when documenting the medical findings in a patient with a cervical strain. Use of the term whiplash to describe cervical strain injuries may implicate political, medicolegal, or emotional connotations, thereby detracting from the clinical reality of cervical strain injuries.
  • Whiplash injury is one of the more frequently disputed conditions in the medical literature. More than $29 billion dollars per year are spent on whiplash injuries and litigation in the US alone.
    • The prognosis of acute whiplash varies according to the population sampled and the insurance and/or compensation system under which individuals are allowed to claim benefits (Cote, 2001).

    • Patients may continue to experience neck pain despite the settlement of legal cases. In rare cases, patients can be malingerers. Some patients may tend to magnify their symptoms out of proportion to their mechanism of trauma or the physical examination findings (Hoffberg, 2002).

    • The natural history of acute whiplash-type complaints may be more favorable in the Greek medicolegal system, which does not allow financial compensation for low-energy accidents.

    • In Lithuania, where few drivers have car insurance, Schrader et al found that chronic symptoms of late whiplash syndrome were not related more to expectations of disability, family history, and pre-existing symptoms than to car accidents (Schrader, 1996).
  • Freeman determined that the following statements had no epidemiological or scientific basis, as reported in the literature (Freeman, 1999):
    • "Whiplash injuries do not lead to chronic pain."

    • "Rear-impact collisions that do not result in vehicle damage are unlikely to cause injury."

    • "Whiplash trauma is biomechanically comparable to common movements of daily living."
  PICTURES Section 10 of 11   Click here to go to the previous section in this topic Click here to go to the top of this page Click here to go to the next section in this topic
Author Information Introduction Clinical Differentials Workup Treatment Medication Follow-up Miscellaneous Pictures Bibliography

Caption: Picture 1. Radiograph of the cervical spine shows a normal lordotic curve.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Picture Type: X-RAY
Caption: Picture 2. Radiograph of the cervical spine shows straightening of the lordotic curve.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Picture Type: X-RAY
Caption: Picture 3. MRI of the cervical spine shows disk protrusion.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Picture Type: MRI
  BIBLIOGRAPHY Section 11 of 11   Click here to go to the previous section in this topic Click here to go to the top of this page
Author Information Introduction Clinical Differentials Workup Treatment Medication Follow-up Miscellaneous Pictures Bibliography

  • Anderson AV: Cervicogenic processes: results of injury to the cervical spine. Pain Practitioner 2001; 11: 9-11.
  • Aprill C, Dwyer A, Bogduk N: Cervical zygapophyseal joint pain patterns. II: A clinical evaluation. Spine 1990 Jun; 15(6): 458-61[Medline].
  • Ashina M, Bendtsen L, Jensen R, et al: Muscle hardness in patients with chronic tension-type headache: relation to actual headache state. Pain 1999 Feb; 79(2-3): 201-5[Medline].
  • Banic B: Evidence for spinal cord hypersensitivity in chronic pain after whiplash injury and in fibromyalgia. Pain 2004; 107: 7-15[Medline].
  • Barnsley L, Lord S, Bogduk N: Comparative local anaesthetic blocks in the diagnosis of cervical zygapophysial joint pain. Pain 1993 Oct; 55(1): 99-106[Medline].
  • Barnsley L, Lord S, Bogduk N: Whiplash injury. Pain 1994 Sep; 58(3): 283-307[Medline].
  • Benthien H, Wohllebe W: [On the therapy of central venous thrombosis using streptokinase]. Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena) 1968 Apr 1; 62(7): 388-90[Medline].
  • Bogduk N: Point of view. Spine 2002; 27: 40-1.
  • Buonocore E, Hartman JT, Nelson CL: Cineradiograms of cervical spine in diagnosis of soft-tissue injuries. JAMA 1966 Oct 3; 198(1): 143-7[Medline].
  • Buskila D: Increased radtes of fibromyalgia following cervical spine injury. A controlled study of 161 cases of traumatic injury. Arthritis Rheum 1997; 40: 446-52[Medline].
  • Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Cote P: Frequency, timing, and course of depressive symptomatology after whiplash. Spine 2006 Jul 15; 31(16): E551-6[Medline].
  • Cassidy JD, Carroll L, Coté P, et al: Low back pain after traffic collisions: a population-based cohort study. Spine 2003 May 15; 28(10): 1002-9[Medline].
  • Castro WHM: Do whiplash injuries occur in low-speed rear impacts? Presented at the North American Spine Society; New York, NY; 1997.
  • Cauthen JC, Kinard RE, Vogler JB, et al: Outcome analysis of noninstrumented anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion in 348 patients. Spine 1998 Jan 15; 23(2): 188-92[Medline].
  • Chen TY: The clinical presentation of uppermost cervical disc protrusion. Spine 2000 Feb 15; 25(4): 439-42[Medline].
  • Chiu TT, Lam TH, Hedley AJ: A randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of exercise for patients with chronic neck pain. Spine 2005 Jan 1; 30(1): E1-7[Medline].
  • Conlin A, Bhogal S, Sequeira K, Teasell R: Treatment of whiplash-associated disorders part I: Non-invasive interventions. Pain Res Manag 2005; 10(1): 21-32[Medline].
  • Conlin A, Bhogal S, Sequeira K: Treatment of whiplash-associated disorders Part II: Medical and surgical interventions. Pain Res Manag 2005 Spring; 10(1): 33-40[Medline].
  • Cote P, Cassidy JD, Carroll L: The factors associated with neck pain and its related disability in the Saskatchewan population. Spine 2000 May 1; 25(9): 1109-17[Medline].
  • Cote P, Cassidy JD, Carroll L: A systematic review of the prognosis of acute whiplash and a new conceptual framework to synthesize the literature. Spine 2001 Oct 1; 26(19): E445-58[Medline].
  • Croft PR, Lewis M, Papageorgiou AC, et al: Risk factors for neck pain: a longitudinal study in the general population. Pain 2001 Sep; 93(3): 317-25[Medline].
  • Cusick JF, Pintar FA, Yoganandan N: Whiplash syndrome: kinematic factors influencing pain patterns. Spine 2001 Jun 1; 26(11): 1252-8