Continually Updated Clinical Reference
 
 
  All Sources     eMedicine     Medscape     Drug Reference     MEDLINE
 
eMedicine - Seating Evaluation and Wheelchair Prescription : Article by

Quick Find
Authors & Editors
Introduction
Equipment Categories
Assessment And Team Members
Seating And Wheelchair Assessment
Specific Assessment Consideration For Mobility Assistive Equipment
Reimbursement Trends
Components Of Wheelchairs Useful In Prescription Writing
Resources And Current Medicare Guidelines
Multimedia
References




Patient Education
Click here for patient education.



Author: Pamela E Wilson, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado; Medical Director of Assistive Technology, Medical Director, Spinal Defects Clinic, Training Director, Pediatric Rehabilitation Fellowship, The Children's Hospital

Pamela E Wilson is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Coauthor(s): Michelle L Lange, OTR, ABDA, ATP, Owner, Access to Independence; Benjamin R Mandac, MD, Medical Director of Pediatric Rehabilitation, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center

Editors: Virginia Simson Nelson, MD, MPH, Chief, Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Division of Pediatric and Adolescent, Dept of PM&R, University of Michigan; Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine; Richard Salcido, MD, Chairman, Erdman Professor of Rehabilitation, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine; Kelly L Allen, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Lourdes Regional Rehabilitation Center, Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center; Rene Cailliet, MD, Professor-Chairman Emeritus, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Southern California School of Medicine; Former Director, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Santa Monica Hospital Medical Center

Author and Editor Disclosure

Synonyms and related keywords: assistive device, wheelchair, mobility device, mobility assistive equipment, MAE, wheelchairs, scooters, power wheelchairs, electronic aides to daily living, EADLs, DME, durable medical equipment

Wheelchair seating and mobility is a technical and specialized area of rehabilitation medicine. One must understand the unique characteristics of the individual and the current technology in order to choose the best type of mobility assistive equipment (MAE). Successful delivery of a wheelchair and seating system begins with making the determination that the patient has a mobility impairment that requires the use of an MAE. Rehabilitation principles apply in the decision-making process. The needs of the patient, as well as of the caregiver, are paramount. Goals include facilitation of mobility, positioning, support, adaptations to temporary or permanent conditions, and optimization of function. An appropriately used system that is accepted by the patient and caregiver is an indicator of a well-developed system.



Positioning and mobility are used to augment function in individuals with physical, sensory, and/or cognitive limitations by providing opportunities to be as independent as possible. This is achieved by providing the following type of equipment:

  • Seating: Providing support and proper positioning for the individual can range from simple changes, such as modifying typical classroom chairs, to the very complex, such as molded seating systems.
  • Mobility: This includes all the equipment that allows an individual to move more efficiently in his or her environment. This can be anything from crutches, walkers, and gait trainers to dependent mobility bases (adapted strollers), manual wheelchairs, scooters, and power wheelchairs.
  • Actuators: These include power tilts, recline devices, an elevating leg rest, and seat elevators.
  • Assistive technology and attachment mechanisms: These include augmentative communication devices, laptop computers, and electronic aides to daily living (EADLs).



Assessment can occur in a number of settings, including a specialty medical clinic, a supplier's office, or a natural environment (eg, classroom, work place). The members of the team depend on the complexity of the individual being evaluated. Team members can include the following:

  • Physiatrist and other physicians
  • Physical therapist
  • Occupational therapist
  • Speech language therapist
  • Rehabilitation engineer
  • Social worker
  • Technician
  • Orthotist
  • Durable medical equipment (DME) provider
  • Educational representative
  • Third-party payer representative
  • Representatives of insurance companies, vocational rehabilitation, or private agencies
  • Case manager

The current working model is for teams to use a family-centered approach in which the client and family are incorporated into the decision-making process. This is a critical element in ordering equipment because the end user must be satisfied with the end product to ensure its use. The clinic model has the disadvantage of requiring the client to leave his or her natural environment but, at the same time, provides an opportunity for a group of well-qualified personnel to demonstrate and recommend appropriate equipment.

Optimally, the client and family can see and play with different styles of equipment. The other options are the DME provider's office or the natural environment (eg, work, home, school). The natural environment provides an opportunity to truly assess how equipment can be used. Existing barriers can be identified, and their impact on mobility and function can be realistically examined.



The positioning and mobility assessment includes a medical, psychosocial, and functional history, along with a complete physical examination. Key elements include the following:

  • Background information: This includes basic demographics, medical diagnoses and associated conditions, past or planned surgeries, current therapies, vocation or occupation, leisure activities, family and caregiver involvement, home and work environments.
  • Client and caregiver goals: These include both short- and long-term goals.
  • Current level of function: Range of motion, muscle tone, reflexes, motor control, vision, hearing, cognitive status, communication, skin integrity, pain problems, and ability with activities of daily living (ADLs) are assessed.
  • Seating: This includes a complete evaluation of existing seating and the attributes of the system that are working well and those that are problematic. A full evaluation out of the wheelchair and seating simulation provide optimal information. Pressure mapping may be incorporated to further enhance seating decisions.
  • Mobility: This includes a review of the client's current mobility and a determination of functional levels. Different types of equipment are recommended based on ambulation skills, balance, upper and lower extremity function, cognition, and endurance.



Walkers and gait trainers

Walkers and gait trainers often provide independent short-distance mobility, but they are rarely appropriate for long distances or outdoor use. This requires too much effort and time for the user. Keep in mind the need for long-distance mobility.

Adaptive strollers

Many families prefer an adaptive stroller to a manual wheelchair. Manual wheelchairs typically do not provide adequate support for the very young child. Strollers have growth potential, but the equipment can generally only be used for 1-3 years.

Manual wheelchairs

An extensive variety of manual wheelchairs is on the market, each with different available options. These chairs can be designed for either independent or dependent propulsion.

Manual wheelchairs are available in either a folding or rigid frame design. Rigid frames tend to be lighter weight and more efficient. These frames have more adjustability in personalizing the fit and responsiveness of the wheelchair. Aspects such as rear wheel position, camber, and seat dump can be incorporated. Folding frames may be easier for families to load, but they are heavier and have more parts. Optimizing the position for propulsion is critical for endurance and for minimizing the risk of repetitive stress injuries.

Another manual wheelchair type is the tilt-in-space wheelchair, which is used for clients who need assistance with positioning and mobility. They tend to be heavier and more difficult to load into automobiles.

Power mobility devices

Power mobility devices (PMDs) include power-assist wheels, scooters, and power wheelchairs. Scooters tend to be less expensive and are easy to transport, but they lack supportive seating. Power-assist wheels can be added to a manual wheelchair, and the chair is easy to transport; however, a certain level of coordination is needed for operation.

Power wheelchairs can be fit with a variety of actuator options, including tilt, recline, and seat elevation. The 3 traditional configurations are rear wheel, center or mid wheel, and front wheel. Assistive technology devices can be adapted to the wheelchair. Newer, high-technology wheelchairs are being developed and include the IBOT, which has the ability to navigate stairs using a gyroscope system.

Seating

The goals of seating must include the following rehabilitation concepts:

  • Maintain alignment of the skeletal system
  • Correct or accommodate skeletal deformity
  • Decrease tone and inhibit reflexive patterns
  • Provide a stable base to optimize function
  • Facilitate normal movements
  • Inhibit abnormal movements
  • Provide support for weak muscles
  • Prevent abnormal pressure distribution, which may lead to skin breakdown
  • Improve sitting tolerance and endurance
  • Maximize the user's physiology
  • Reduce or relieve pain

Data collection

Obtaining information in 3 critical areas is necessary to help define and determine appropriate seating. These include physical and disability characteristics, functional skills, and lifestyle and preferences.

Information categorized in the physical and disability characteristics domain includes the following:

  • What is the general health and underlying disease or disability?
  • Is the underlying condition static or progressive?
  • Are surgeries or medical procedures planned that may affect the fit or function of the seat? For example, a patient who undergoes a posterior spine fusion will have changes in the alignment of the spine and position of the pelvis. If such a procedure is planned, then it may be desirable to wait before measuring for the seat and wheelchair, or the seat must have the capability to be modified to meet the new needs of the user.
  • Is the client thin, average, or obese?
  • How is the client's balance?
  • Does the person have abnormal tone or spasticity, and how does this impact positioning?
  • Are orthopedic issues present that will influence seating, such as a scoliosis, pelvic obliquity, wind swept pelvis, dislocated hip, tight hip flexors, or other contractures?
  • Does the patient have issues of bowel and bladder incontinence?
  • Is sensation normal or abnormal?
  • Does the client have swallowing or breathing issues?
  • If this person has pain, what is can be done to minimize its impact on seating?

Information on functional skills and cognition should include the following:

  • What is the upper and lower extremity function?
  • How good is the client's head and truck control, and how is the client's balance?
  • What ADLs need to be performed from the wheelchair?
  • What is the style of propulsion of the wheelchair; will it be independent or assisted?
  • How does the client transfer in and out of wheelchair?

Information about lifestyle and personal preferences should include the following:

  • What are the expectations for how this wheelchair will be used?
  • How will the wheelchair be transported?
  • Is the home wheelchair accessible?
  • Is the patient currently receiving therapy, and, if so, what are the goals and expected outcomes of the therapy?
  • Consider all environments in which the wheelchair will be used (eg, home, work, school, leisure, recreation).

Physical examination

A physical examination and postural assessment are necessary components of the evaluation of the patient's condition. The following data should be obtained during the hands-on evaluation. Using a systematic approach helps achieve a skilled and thorough examination.

Begin with a general inspection and observation, which should include assessment of the following:

  • General health
  • Cognition and developmental
  • Posture
  • Body symmetry
  • Skin
  • Balance and coordination
  • Function, including use of upper and lower extremities

The musculoskeletal examination should include assessment of the following:

  • Head and neck, including position, strength, and abnormalities
  • Spine, including scoliosis, kyphosis, and lordosis
  • Pelvic position, such as an obliquity or asymmetry noted along with anterior and posterior tilt
  • Hip examination, including range of motion (ie, flexion, abduction, adduction, rotation)
  • Knee evaluation for extension range of motion
  • Foot deformity and range of motion
  • Upper extremity range of motion

The neurological examination should assess the following:

  • Tone and spasticity
  • Abnormal reflexes and positions
  • Muscle strength and coordination
  • Sensory system, including touch, pressure, proprioception, and temperature

The functional examination should assess the following:

  • The capabilities of the client while in a sitting position
  • Head control, balance, protective reflexes, strength, arm and leg function, and coordination

After all data are synthesized, the goals for a seating system can be identified. The goals should be prioritized so that when goals conflict, the basis for compromise is understood and communicated clearly to all parties involved. One example is with deciding which cushion to use. The primary goal of a proper cushion is to prevent pressure sores; however, it may be equally important for the cushion to be lightweight. Otherwise, the patient may not use it.

A clear statement of goals and consensus surrounding the goals greatly simplifies the selection of the device because only devices with the necessary features need to be considered. Documenting the process can be extremely effective in justifying to the third-party payer why the particular device was selected and why other less expensive devices are inadequate for the stated medical goals.

The seating device can usually be obtained through a DME dealer. In some cases, it may be provided by an orthotist, rehabilitation technologist, or a rehabilitation engineer, particularly if the device is fabricated especially for a given patient or requires some specialized custom feature. For commercially available seating systems, the dealer is usually a helpful resource on which equipment is available to meet the needs identified. The dealer can suggest products from different manufacturers and explain how different products may be combined to produce a better result. He or she can also provide information on durability and reliability and should be able to advise both the patient and the therapist on which options are reimbursed by the third-party payer.

Most third-party payers look to the physician for the medical basis for providing a seating system. The physician is best qualified to document the patient's current medical status, the prognosis for the underlying diagnosis, the medical goals for the seat, and the implications of improper seating. The physician is also expected to provide information on whether surgery or other medical procedures are planned that may affect the use of the seat. The physician or health care professional is often responsible for generating a letter of medical necessity.

Components of a typical prescription for MAE are as follows:

  • Medical condition that is related to the mobility issue
  • Duration of the condition for which the equipment is needed
  • Prognosis
  • Definition of functional limitations, especially in relation to ADLs
  • Other interventions that have been used or tried
  • Medical equipment: Be specific about parts, such as writing a prescription that states a manual wheelchair is inadequate.
  • Justification for the MAE
  • Signature and credentials of prescribing individual



The trends for reimbursement for seating systems seem to be headed in opposite directions. As the benefits of seating have become more widely accepted, individuals find it easier to have the devices paid for under their insurance coverage for DME; however, the current emphasis in health care on reducing costs is causing private insurers to eliminate high-priced services, such as DME and seating, from their coverage. The policies of public agencies, such as Medicaid, vary from state to state in regard to coverage and the method by which they calculate rates of reimbursement. In some cases, a provider may be reimbursed at the retail cost of the seat, whereas, in other locations, providers may be reimbursed at retail cost less a substantial discount.

The obvious effect of coverage limitations is that some individuals are able to acquire needed seating devices, while others are not; however, the effect that reimbursement policies have on the quality of the products delivered to patients is less obvious. Because most providers are not reimbursed separately for the time they spend to provide a seat, their time and other business expenses are reimbursed only to the extent that they generate some profit from the sale of the seat. Effective seating is reflected primarily in the service provided by qualified professionals, rather than in the purchase of any particular product. Reimbursement policies that focus on the price paid for the product undermine the service delivery system and can result in the purchase of a seat that may be inadequate to meet the needs of the patient.

When professionals recommend a seating system and third-party payers consider reimbursement, it is important to keep in mind that cost consciousness is defined best as value-conscious, rather than just price-conscious; however, this trend is not likely to be reversed until the industry can establish formal training and certification programs, which will enable patients and third-party payers to distinguish providers qualified to deliver high-quality seating services.



  • Push handles: These are used to assist the client with mobility and propulsion. They can attach to the backrest or the frame.
  • Backrest: This is the upright portion on the back of a wheelchair to which the seating is attached. The height is determined by the amount of support needed by the client. Manual wheelchairs should allow for unrestricted use of the upper extremities.
  • Armrests: These are used to support the upper extremities. If they are positioned too high, they cause shoulder elevation. If they are positioned too low, they can cause shoulder subluxation and can contribute to poor posture. Users with good upper extremity function may not wish to have these on the wheelchair because they may interfere with movement.
  • Wheels: This includes the rims, push rims, axles, hubs, some attachment of the axle to the rim (either spokes or mags), tires, and tubes. Tires can be pneumatic, semipneumatic, or solid.
  • Axle plate: This is the receiver for the axle, connecting the wheels to the frame.
  • Axle position: This where the axle is in relationship to the body. A forward position makes the base smaller and the wheels easier to access. However, the wheelchair is more unstable (more likely to tip over). In addition, the forward position makes performing a maneuver to bring the wheelchair on to its 2 back wheels (ie, a "wheelie") easier. A posterior, or reverse, position increases the wheelchair base and makes access to the wheels more difficult; however, the chair tends to be more stable.
  • Wheel locks or brakes: These are attached to the frame and they block the wheels from moving or turning; some clients require extensions. They also can consist of front caster locks.
  • Camber: This is the orientation and angulation of the wheels in relation to the frame. Zero camber is straight up and down and provides the narrowest width; however, the wheelchair is less responsive. Positive camber increases the responsiveness of the wheelchair but increases the width. Sports chairs typically have 15° or more of camber.
  • Frame: This is the skeletal system of the wheelchair, which supports the seat and provides for wheel attachment via the axle plate. The width of the frame is critical to mobility. A proper-fitting frame allows the individual optimal access to the wheels. A narrow frame is more functional and can more easily negotiate environmental barriers. Although growth should be considered in pediatric wheelchair frames, the wheelchair must fit the child. Historically, wheelchairs have been ordered with the intention that the child would grow into them. To place a person in an ill-fitting wheelchair is a true disservice to the user.
  • Footrest and footplate: These provide support to the lower extremities. Shoe holders or straps may need to be incorporated into the footrest and footplate in order to maintain proper foot position.
  • Front casters: These are the smaller wheels on the front of the wheelchair. The smaller the wheel, the more responsive the chair; however, smaller wheels tend to cause the ride to be bumpier and can catch on or drop into environmental barriers. Bigger wheels tend to be harder to turn, but they fare better outside and on bumpy terrain.
  • Seat sling or seating pan: This supports the cushion or seating system.
  • Cushion characteristics and types: If a cushion is to be used on a wheelchair, then factors to consider are weight, shear forces, pressure distribution, heat dissipation, and moisture tolerance. The ideal cushion should be functional and comfortable, provide pressure relief, be easy to use, and be cost effective. Several categories of cushions are available in current practice, including the following:
    • Foam cushions tend to be least expensive, are lightweight, and have different densities. The foam compresses over time and must be replaced. Its pressure-relieving properties vary.
    • Air cushions are expensive but lightweight. Pressure is evenly distributed, but they require maintenance and must be properly inflated.
    • Gel cushions are expensive and heavy. Pressure is distributed over the gel, but they can bottom-out, leak, and retain heat.
    • Thermoplastic urethane (honeycomb) cushions are expensive, lightweight, washable, and offer some pressure relief; however, they compress over time. They do not retain heat.
    • Custom-molded orthotic cushions are a molded system and are very expensive. They must be adjusted for growth, and they can retain heat.



The 2005 Medicare guidelines

The restructuring of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid divided the country into 4 geographic regions, with each having a DME carrier that makes decisions on equipment. The new guidelines are based on the development of functional criteria for equipment of medical necessity. The following statements are components adapted from the new guidelines:

  • A face-to-face examination must be performed by the treating physician in order to initiate and determine the medical necessity for a PMD.
  • Canes, crutches, walkers, manual wheelchairs, power wheelchairs, and scooters are now all termed MAE.
  • The basis for a prescription for an MAE must be logical; documentation of why less expensive and less technical equipment is not appropriate must be included.
  • MAE can only be ordered to enhance "mobility related activities of daily living" in the home and cannot be prescribed for community needs. Therefore, given the current guidelines, a wheelchair cannot be prescribed if someone can walk around the home but would need this equipment to go to the doctor or grocery store. Mobility is not considered a medical necessity.

The wheelchair and seating industry continues to evolve. Experience, economics, and consumer needs drive the changes in the industry. More information is readily available through professional groups, such as the Rehabilitation Engineering Society of North America (RESNA) and the Paralyzed Veterans of America (PVA). Information is also readily available over the Internet. A search yields many sites on wheelchair and seating, but many sites are primarily commercial in nature, not truly informational. Introductory Internet sites include RESNA and WheelchairNet.



Media file 1:  This illustration shows a wheelchair with a sling seat and back, with no adaptations for support. Note the elevating leg rests and reclining back. This wheelchair would be for institutional or short-term use only.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 2:  Example of a manual rigid wheelchair with cambered rear wheels and a foam cushion. Note the small front wheels and no push handles.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 3:  Power scooter with a 3-wheel configuration; no specialized seating is available
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 4:  Power wheelchair with joystick drive and minimized special seating.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 5:  This is an air filled cushion. They require maintenance but have even pressure distribution.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 6:  The IBOT wheelchair uses newer technology to allow stair climbing and upright position along with traditional wheelchair features.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 7:  Sports wheelchair used for track and road racing.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo



  • Axelson P, Minkel J, Chesney D. A Guide to Wheelchair Selection- How to Use the ANSI/RESNA Wheelchair Standards. 1994;Available at: http://www.wheelchairnet.org/WCN_WCU/wcu.html. [Full Text].
  • Currie D, Hardwick K, Marburger R. Wheelchair prescription and adaptive seating. In: Rehabilitation Medicine: Principles and Practice. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven;. 1998:763-88.
  • Geyer MJ, Brienza DM, Bertocci GE, et al. Wheelchair seating: a state of the science report. Assist Technol. 2003;15(2):120-8.
  • Samuelsson KA, Tropp H, Nylander E, Gerdle B. The effect of rear-wheel position on seating ergonomics and mobility efficiency in wheelchair users with spinal cord injuries: A pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev. Jan-Feb 2004;41(1):65-74.
  • Ward DE. Prescriptive Seating for Wheeled Mobility: Theory, Application, and Terminology. Vol 1. Ft Lauderdale, Fla:. Healthwealth International;1996.
  • Yuen HK, Garrett D. Comparison of three wheelchair cushions for effectiveness of pressure relief. Am J Occup Ther. Jul-Aug 2001;55(4):470-5.

Seating Evaluation and Wheelchair Prescription excerpt

Article Last Updated: Jul 21, 2006