Continually Updated Clinical Reference
 
 
  All Sources     eMedicine     Medscape     Drug Reference     MEDLINE
 
eMedicine - Heterotopic Ossification in Spinal Cord Injury : Article by

Quick Find
Authors & Editors
Introduction
Clinical
Differentials
Workup
Treatment
Medication
Follow-up
Miscellaneous
Multimedia
References

Related Articles
Cellulitis

Deep Venous Thrombosis




Patient Education
Click here for patient education.



Author: Denise I Campagnolo, MD, MS, Director of Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Research and Staff Physiatrist, Barrow Neurology Clinics, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center; Investigator for Barrow Neurology Clinics; Director, NARCOMS Project for Consortium of MS Centers, Phoenix

Denise I Campagnolo is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American Paraplegia Society, Association of Academic Physiatrists, and Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers

Editors: Robert L Sheridan, MD, Assistant Chief of Staff, Chief of Burn Surgery, Shriners Burns Hospital; Associate Professor of Surgery, Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Burns, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine; Kat Kolaski, MD, Assistant Professor, Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Pediatrics, Wake Forest University School of Medicine; Kelly L Allen, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Lourdes Regional Rehabilitation Center, Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center; Robert H Meier III, MD, Director, Amputee Services of America; Active Medical Staff, Presbyterian/St Luke's Hospital, Spalding Rehabilitation Hospital, Select Specialty Hospital; Consulting Staff, Kindred Hospital

Author and Editor Disclosure

Synonyms and related keywords: heterotopic ossification, HO, spinal cord injury, SCI, traumatic brain injury, TBI, ossification, ectopic calcification, heterotopic bone, heterotopic bone formation, ossified, neurogenic heterotopic ossification, paraosteoarthropathy of paraplegia

Background

Heterotopic ossification (HO) following spinal cord injury (SCI) was described first by Dejerine and Ceillier in 1918 as paraosteoarthropathy. The ossification process in this case involves the formation of mature lamellar bone, which is indistinguishable from normal bone, in soft tissues surrounding paralyzed joints. The bone is not connected to periosteum and becomes encapsulated as it matures.

The pathology is similar to that of fracture callus, except that bone forms in the connective tissue between the muscle planes. HO also is seen after other neurologic insults, such as traumatic brain injury (TBI) and stroke, as well as after thermal injuries and orthopedic procedures (eg, total hip replacement).

In experimental models of HO formation, ischemia and tissue expression of bone morphogenic proteins have been shown to play important roles. Bone morphogenic proteins likely act on mesenchymal stem cells present in tissue, activating the cells to differentiate into osteoblasts.1

Related eMedicine topics:
Heterotopic Ossification [Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation]
Heterotopic Ossification [Radiology]
Posttraumatic Heterotopic Ossification
Spinal Cord Injuries
Traumatic Heterotopic Ossification

Pathophysiology

The pathophysiology of heterotopic ossification (HO) involves an inflammatory process, with increased blood flow in soft tissue. Bone matrix is laid down and mineralized, and this sequence reaches completion in 6-18 months. Local, systemic, neural, and hormonal causes for the HO process have been hypothesized but have not been proven (see Causes). Debate continues over whether there is migration of distant mesenchymal cells or transformation of existing mesenchymal cells into osteoblasts.

Frequency

United States

The incidence of heterotopic ossification (HO) in spinal cord injury (SCI) is between 16% and 53%, depending on the incidence reports from various institutions. Once present, neurogenic HO is clinically significant in 18-27% of cases. Fortunately, only 3-5% of cases involve joint ankylosis.

Mortality/Morbidity

No direct mortality is associated with neurogenic heterotopic ossification. Morbidity is associated primarily with loss of range of motion (ROM) and the consequent loss of joint function.

Race

There is no known race predilection for neurogenic heterotopic ossification.

Sex

The male-to-female ratio for neurogenic heterotopic ossification is 1:1.

Age

The incidence of neurogenic heterotopic ossification (NHO) after spinal cord injury is lower in pediatric patients than in adults, ranging from 3-10%. In addition, spontaneous resorption of the NHO is frequently seen in pediatric patients.2



History

The adult patient with neurogenic heterotopic ossification (NHO) gives a history of progressive loss of ROM accompanied by pain or swelling in the involved area. Most pediatric patients present with decreased ROM but are less likely to have physical symptoms. The average length of time reported between injury and diagnosis of NHO in the adult population is 6 months, in contrast to 14 months after injury in the pediatric population. The use of 3-phase bone scanning to detect HO may result in a shorter average reporting time between injury and diagnosis.

Physical

Limited ROM is seen at the involved joint, possibly accompanied by redness, warmth, or swelling.

Causes

  • Debate continues on whether there is migration of distant mesenchymal cells or transformation of existing mesenchymal cells into osteoblasts. Osteoinductive factors have been studied, including circulating biochemicals and local factors (eg, venous thrombosis, venous insufficiency, decubitus ulcers, edema, tissue hypoxia). None of these factors has been proven to play a pivotal role in NHO.
  • Genetic predisposition for NHO has not been confirmed.
  • Patients with limb spasticity have a greater risk of developing NHO, and patients with extensive amounts of NHO have severe spasticity.



Cellulitis
Deep Venous Thrombosis

Other Problems to Be Considered

Benign effusion
Fracture
Hematoma
Tumor



Lab Studies

  • The serum alkaline phosphatase (SAP) level can be used to detect early onset of heterotopic ossification (HO), because it is a marker of osteoblastic and osteogenic activity that increase with bone deposition.3 With HO, AP rises at 2 weeks, exceeds normal values at 3 weeks, peaks at 10 weeks, and then returns to normal after the HO is mature; however, AP levels are nonspecific for HO. Levels also are elevated with trauma and fractures.
  • Serum calcium levels are transiently depressed.
  • In animal models, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) has been shown to induce subperiosteal lamellar bone formation.4 PGE2 may be an inducer of bone formation in humans. PGE2 urinary excretion has been measured over a 24-hour period in patients with acute spinal cord injury, and excretion was shown to increase in patients who developed HO.5 Excretion continued until the bone reached maturity.

Imaging Studies

  • Bone scintigraphy is performed using a 3-phase test involving the injection of technetium-99m (99mTc)labeled methylene diphosphonate. This procedure permits an early diagnosis of neurogenic heterotopic ossification (NHO).3 The first 2 phases (blood flow and blood pool) are the most sensitive indicators, but they are less specific; the third phase is positive 4 weeks prior to the appearance of findings on plain radiographs. The 3-phase bone scan returns to normal as the NHO matures in 6-18 months after injury. False negative studies can occur, so follow-up studies are indicated for patients with clinically suspicious HO but negative initial bone scans.6

    Quantitative radionuclide scans compare the ratio of uptake in heterotopic bone versus normal bone. This ratio decreases over time, and a steady state is noted as the bone reaches maturity.7 This steady state, however, has not been shown to be a good predictor of recurrence of HO.
  • Plain film detects NHO 5-7 weeks after injury, a relatively late finding.
  • Computed tomography (CT) scanning is used to determine the volume of bone needed when planning surgical resection.
  • Ultrasonography permits an early diagnosis of HO (before radiography).8
    • A typical zone phenomenon that depends on the age of the lesion and the degree of mineralization takes place, characterized by the following:
      • An echolucent zone of surrounding muscle enclosing a broader reflective zone, which in turn surrounds an amorphous, echolucent zone
      • A reflective zone containing foci of echogenic islands, which rapidly become confluent and increasingly reflective due to increased mineralization
    • This imaging modality also is useful because it can differentiate HO from abscess or deep vein thrombosis (DVT).
  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to increase T2 signal (edema) in muscles, fascia, and subcutaneous tissue during acute onset HO.9

Histologic Findings

Histologic findings in neurogenic heterotopic ossification are similar to those in healing fracture callus.



Rehabilitation Program

Physical Therapy

Experimental studies in animals suggest that forcible stretching and hematoma induce new bone formation and heterotopic ossification (HO). This conclusion has not been substantiated in humans. Physical therapists (PTs) work on ROM exercises, which are important in maintaining joint function. Once HO is identified, the ROM exercises should be withheld until the inflammatory signs (eg, warmth, erythema) have subsided. Active-assistive range of motion (AAROM) should then be prescribed, and gentle passive range of motion (PROM) should be initiated for completely paralyzed joints.

Occupational Therapy

The occupational therapist (OT) works on activities of daily living (ADL) and functional transfers to compensate for lost ROM due to heterotopic ossification. In addition, the OT and PT work on customizing seating systems to minimize pressure over heterotopic bony prominences.

Medical Issues/Complications

  • Skin breakdown over the sites of bone formation is a significant sequela and an indication for surgical resection of the heterotopic ossification (HO).
  • Pain is another complication of HO in patients with neurologically incomplete spinal cord injury.
  • Peripheral nerve entrapment has been documented as a possible complication of HO. The ulnar and femoral nerves are most frequently involved, and in such instances, entrapment can result in further neurologic loss of function in incomplete injuries. CT scanning is useful for planning surgical resection of an entrapped peripheral nerve.

Surgical Intervention

Surgery is indicated in those patients with seating problems, skin breakdown, pain, or loss of function.10 Surgery is performed on neurogenic heterotopic ossification (NHO) if there is loss of function at a joint or if other complications exist.

  • Traditional thought is that the surgery must be delayed until the bone scan ratio is at steady state and the SAP returns to normal, which is usually 12-18 months after injury.
  • However, several investigators have published good results that were achieved with early wedge resection of HO that had not reached maturity.11 Etidronate disodium and/or radiation therapy is warranted after surgery to prevent the recurrence of NHO.

Consultations

Orthopedic surgical consultation is recommended for patients with neurogenic heterotopic ossification who require surgical resection of the bone.



Bisphosphonates prevent the formation of hydroxyapatite crystals. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reduce the inflammatory process that precedes the formation of the collagenous bony matrix.

Drug Category: Bisphosphonates

Analogs of pyrophosphate act by binding to hydroxyapatite in bone matrix, thereby inhibiting the dissolution of crystals and blocking the formation of hydroxyapatite crystals. Bisphosphonates prevent osteoclast attachment to the bone matrix, as well as osteoclast recruitment and viability.

In 1981, Finerman and Stover treated patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) with etidronate disodium for 12 weeks, starting at 20 mg/kg/d PO for 2 weeks and then 10 mg/kg/d PO for 10 weeks.12 The final incidence of heterotopic ossification (HO) in the etidronate disodium group was reduced, and the amount HO laid down was smaller. In subsequent research, patients given higher doses of etidronate, administered intravenously (300 mg/d x 3 d), followed by 20 mg/kg taken orally for 6 months and started early (before radiographic evidence of HO was apparent), showed a significant reduction in the incidence of HO.13 Etidronate disodium also prevents the recurrence of neurogenic HO that has been resected in patients with SCI.

This is a relatively safe drug. GI symptoms are the most common adverse effect (eg, nausea, diarrhea, abdominal distress) and can be limited if the daily dose is split into several doses.

A newer bisphosphonate, pamidronate, may have pronounced beneficial effects in high-risk patients with established HO who are undergoing excision surgery, but the timing of dosing has not been established.14

Drug NameEtidronate disodium (Didronel)
DescriptionSimilar to an inorganic pyrophosphate. Pyrophosphates inhibit calcium deposition and thereby inhibit precipitation of calcium phosphate from solution. The actual mechanism is the blockage of transformation of calcium phosphate to hydroxyapatite crystals. Thus, there is a delay in the aggregation of hydroxyapatite crystals into larger clusters.
Adult Dose20 mg/kg/d PO for 2 wk initially, followed by 10 mg/kg/d for 10 wk
Alternatively, 300 mg/d for 3 d IV, followed by 20 mg/kg PO for 6 mo (has been shown to be more effective)
Pediatric DoseNot established; pediatric patients have been treated with etidronate disodium at doses recommended for adults, to prevent heterotopic ossification or soft-tissue calcifications
ContraindicationsDocumented hypersensitivity, hypocalcemia, or renal impairment; in patients with Class Dc and higher renal functional impairment (serum creatinine >5 mg/dL), IV infusion should be withheld
InteractionsCoadministration with calcium-containing products (eg, milk, milk products, vitamin supplements, antacids) and other multivalent cations (eg, iron, magnesium, aluminum) decreases absorption when ingested within 2 hours of dose; there have been isolated reports of patients experiencing increases in PT when etidronate was added to warfarin therapy; patients on warfarin and receiving etidronate should have PT monitored
PregnancyC - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus
PrecautionsIn teratology and developmental toxicity studies conducted in rats and rabbits treated with dosages of up to 100 mg/kg (5-20 times the clinical dose), no adverse or teratogenic effects have been observed in the offspring; etidronate disodium has been shown to cause skeletal abnormalities in rats when given at oral dose levels of 300 mg/kg (15-60 times the human dose); other effects on the offspring (including decreased live births) are at dosages that cause significant toxicity in the parent generation and are 25-200 times the human dose; skeletal effects are thought to be the result of pharmacologic effects of the drug on bone; etidronate disodium should be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus; not known whether this drug is excreted in human milk, and therefore, exhibit caution when administering to a woman who is breastfeeding
Incidence of GI complaints (eg, diarrhea, nausea) is the same for etidronate disodium at 5 mg/kg/d as for placebo, about 1 patient in 15; at 10 to 20 mg/kg/d, incidence may increase to 2-3 in 10; these complaints often are alleviated by dividing total daily dose; not metabolized and is excreted intact via kidney; hyperphosphatemia may occur at doses of 10-20 mg/kg/d, apparently as a result of drug-related increases in tubular reabsorption of phosphate; serum phosphate levels generally return to normal in 2-4 wks following therapy; there is no experience to guide specific treatment in patients with impaired renal function; etidronate disodium dosage should be reduced when reductions in glomerular filtration rates are noted
Safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients have not been established; a rachitic syndrome has been reported infrequently at doses of 10 mg/kg/d and more for prolonged periods (ie, >9-12 mo); the epiphyseal radiologic changes associated with retarded mineralization of new osteoid and cartilage, and occasional symptoms reported, have been reversible when medication is discontinued

Drug Category: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

NSAIDs have not been studied in the population of individuals with spinal cord injury. In the literature on total hip replacement, NSAIDs are described as possible inhibitors of neurogenic heterotopic ossification in the early stages. The mechanism of action behind the NSAIDs is probably the inhibition of prostaglandins and related inflammatory substances during the initial phase of osteoid formation. Indomethacin was the most common drug studied.15 In this population, which is already at risk for GI bleeding, there obviously is a relative contraindication to NSAID use.

Drug NameIndomethacin (Indocin)
DescriptionHas been shown to be effective in preventing heterotopic ossification formation following total hip replacement. Indomethacin is rapidly absorbed; metabolism occurs in the liver by demethylation, deacetylation, and glucuronide conjugation; the drug inhibits prostaglandin synthesis.
As symptoms subside, the total daily dosage should be reduced to the lowest level required to control symptoms, or the drug should be discontinued.
Adult Dose25 mg PO tid
Pediatric DoseNot established; 2 mg/kg/d PO in divided doses suggested; not to exceed 4 mg/kg/d or 150-200 mg/d, whichever is less
ContraindicationsDocumented hypersensitivity; GI bleeding or renal insufficiency; patients in whom asthmatic attacks, urticaria, or rhinitis have been precipitated by aspirin or other NSAIDs; suppositories are contraindicated in patients with history of proctitis or recent rectal bleeding; concomitant use with diflunisal may decrease renal clearance and significantly increase plasma levels; in some patients, combined use with diflunisal has been associated with fatal GI hemorrhage
InteractionsCoadministration with aspirin increases risk of inducing serious NSAID-related side effects; may decrease effects of beta blockers, hydralazine, and captopril; may decrease diuretic effects of furosemide and thiazides; coadministration with anticoagulants may prolong PT (monitor and watch for signs of bleeding); may increase risk of methotrexate toxicity, which can manifest as stomatitis, bone marrow suppression, or nephrotoxicity; coadministration may increase phenytoin levels; probenecid may increase toxicity of NSAIDS
PregnancyC - Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus
PrecautionsGI bleeding is a risk; concomitant use of indomethacin with other NSAIDs is not recommended due to increased possibility of GI toxicity, with little or no increase in efficacy; not for use by breastfeeding mothers; effectiveness of indomethacin in pediatric patients has not been established; should not be prescribed for pediatric patients aged 14 years and younger unless toxicity or lack of efficacy associated with other drugs warrants risk



Complications

  • Joint ankylosis
  • Skin breakdown over the area of neurogenic heterotopic ossification (NHO)
  • Peripheral nerve entrapment
  • DVT from compression of the veins by the NHO

Prognosis

  • If prophylactic measures are not taken, surgically resected neurogenic heterotopic ossification has a high rate of recurrence (see Surgical Intervention).

Patient Education

  • Patient education, a lifelong process for individuals with spinal cord injury, should include the possible complication of heterotopic ossification (HO). If HO develops, patients need to be informed thoroughly about the condition and the various means of treatment. An ROM program needs to be presented to the patient and family members to prevent a loss of motion, contractures, and a possible loss of function.



Medical/Legal Pitfalls

  • Vague symptoms of discomfort surrounding a paralyzed joint may initially be dismissed by a health care provider. Be sure to evaluate aggressively any discomfort associated with a loss of ROM.



Media file 1:  Three common locations of heterotopic ossification around the hip joint. A is anterolateral/anteromedial, B is inferior and medial, and C is around the femoral neck and posterior.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Image

Media file 2:  Extensive heterotopic ossification at the medial aspect of the left knee.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  X-RAY



  1. Banovac K, Sherman AL, Estores IM. Prevention and treatment of heterotopic ossification after spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2004;27(4):376-82. [Medline].
  2. Hitzig SL, Tonack M, Campbell KA, et al. Secondary health complications in an aging Canadian spinal cord injury sample. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. Jul 2008;87(7):545-55. [Medline].
  3. Orzel JA, Rudd TG. Heterotopic bone formation: clinical, laboratory, and imaging correlation. J Nucl Med. Feb 1985;26(2):125-32. [Medline][Full Text].
  4. Rapuano BE, Boursiquot R, Tomin E, et al. The effects of COX-1 and COX-2 inhibitors on prostaglandin synthesis and the formation of heterotopic bone in a rat model. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. Mar 2008;128(3):333-44. [Medline].
  5. Schurch B, Capaul M, Vallotton MB. Prostaglandin E2 measurements: their value in the early diagnosis of heterotopic ossification in spinal cord injury patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Jul 1997;78(7):687-91. [Medline].
  6. Svircev JN, Wallbom AS. False-negative triple-phase bone scans in spinal cord injury to detect clinically suspect heterotopic ossification: a case series. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31(2):194-6. [Medline].
  7. Kim SW, Wu SY, Kim RC. Computerized quantitative radionuclide assessment of heterotopic ossification in spinal cord injury patients. Paraplegia. Nov 1992;30(11):803-7. [Medline].
  8. Cassar-Pullicino VN, McClelland M, Badwan DA. Sonographic diagnosis of heterotopic bone formation in spinal injury patients. Paraplegia. Jan 1993;31(1):40-50. [Medline].
  9. Wick L, Berger M, Knecht H, et al. Magnetic resonance signal alterations in the acute onset of heterotopic ossification in patients with spinal cord injury. Eur Radiol. Sep 2005;15(9):1867-75. [Medline].
  10. Meiners T, Abel R, Bohm V. Resection of heterotopic ossification of the hip in spinal cord injured patients. Spinal Cord. Jul 1997;35(7):443-5. [Medline].
  11. Freebourn TM, Barber DB, Able AC. The treatment of immature heterotopic ossification in spinal cord injury with combination surgery, radiation therapy and NSAID. Spinal Cord. Jan 1999;37(1):50-3. [Medline].
  12. Finerman GA, Stover SL. Heterotopic ossification following hip replacement or spinal cord injury. Two clinical studies with EHDP. Metab Bone Dis Relat Res. 1981;3(4-5):337-42. [Medline].
  13. Banovac K, Gonzalez F, Wade N. Intravenous disodium etidronate therapy in spinal cord injury patients with heterotopic ossification. Paraplegia. Oct 1993;31(10):660-6. [Medline].
  14. Schuetz P, Mueller B, Christ-Crain M, et al. Amino-bisphosphonates in heterotopic ossification: first experience in five consecutive cases. Spinal Cord. Oct 2005;43(10):604-10. [Medline].
  15. Vanden Bossche LC, Van Maele G, Wojtowicz I, et al. Free radical scavengers are more effective than indomethacin in the prevention of experimentally induced heterotopic ossification. J Orthop Res. Feb 2007;25(2):267-72. [Medline].
  16. Banovac K, Gonzalez F. Evaluation and management of heterotopic ossification in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. Mar 1997;35(3):158-62. [Medline].
  17. Banovac K, Gonzalez F, Renfree KJ. Treatment of heterotopic ossification after spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. Jan 1997;20(1):60-5. [Medline].
  18. Bravo-Payno P, Esclarin A, Arzoz T. Incidence and risk factors in the appearance of heterotopic ossification in spinal cord injury. Paraplegia. Oct 1992;30(10):740-5. [Medline].
  19. Colachis SC 3d, Clinchot DM, Venesy D. Neurovascular complications of heterotopic ossification following spinal cord injury. Paraplegia. Jan 1993;31(1):51-7. [Medline].
  20. Garland DE. A clinical perspective on common forms of acquired heterotopic ossification. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Feb 1991;13-29. [Medline].
  21. Garland DE, Shimoyama ST, Lugo C, et al. Spinal cord insults and heterotopic ossification in the pediatric population. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Aug 1989;303-10. [Medline].
  22. Jaovisidha S, Sartoris DJ, Martin EM. Influence of heterotopic ossification of the hip on bone densitometry: a study in spinal cord injured patients [see comments]. Spinal Cord. Sep 1998;36(9):647-53. [Medline].
  23. Nagaraj N, Elgazzar AH, Fernandez-Ulloa M. Heterotopic ossification mimicking infection. Scintigraphic evaluation. Clin Nucl Med. Sep 1995;20(9):763-6. [Medline].
  24. Renfree KJ, Banovac K, Hornicek FJ. Evaluation of serum osteoblast mitogenic activity in spinal cord and head injury patients with acute heterotopic ossification. Spine. Apr 1 1994;19(7):740-6. [Medline].
  25. Snoecx M, De Muynck M, Van Laere M. Association between muscle trauma and heterotopic ossification in spinal cord injured patients: reflections on their causal relationship and the diagnostic value of ultrasonography. Paraplegia. Aug 1995;33(8):464-8. [Medline].
  26. Stover SL, Hataway CJ, Zeiger HE. Heterotopic ossification in spinal cord-injured patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. May 1975;56(5):199-204. [Medline].
  27. Stover SL, Niemann KM, Tulloss JR. Experience with surgical resection of heterotopic bone in spinal cord injury patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. Feb 1991;71-7. [Medline].

Heterotopic Ossification in Spinal Cord Injury excerpt

Article Last Updated: Sep 5, 2008