Continually Updated Clinical Reference
 
 
  All Sources     eMedicine     Medscape     Drug Reference     MEDLINE
 
eMedicine - Dysphagia : Article by

Quick Find
Authors & Editors
Introduction
Clinical Details
Workup
Treatment
Follow-up
Special Concerns
Multimedia
References




Patient Education
Cancer and Tumors Center

Cancer of the Mouth and Throat Overview

Mouth and Throat Cancer Causes

Mouth and Throat Cancer Symptoms

Mouth and Throat Cancer Treatment




Author: Nam-Jong Paik, MD, PhD, Chief, Associate Professor of Rehabilitation Medicine, Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Nam-Jong Paik is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine

Editors: Milton J Klein, DO, MBA, Consulting Physiatrist, Sewickley Valley Hospital, Allegheny General Hospital, Harmarville Rehabilitation Center, Ohio Valley General Hospital and Aliquippa Community Hospital; Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine; Richard Salcido, MD, Chairman, Erdman Professor of Rehabilitation, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine; Kelly L Allen, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Lourdes Regional Rehabilitation Center, Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center; Denise I Campagnolo, MD, MS, Director of Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Research and Staff Physiatrist, Barrow Neurology Clinics, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center; Investigator for Barrow Neurology Clinics; Director, NARCOMS Project for Consortium of MS Centers, Phoenix

Author and Editor Disclosure

Synonyms and related keywords: dysphagia, swallowing disorders, deglutition disorders, disordered eating, difficulty eating, disrupted swallowing, aphagia

Dysphagia is a Greek word that means disordered eating. Dysphagia typically refers to difficulty in eating as a result of disruption in the swallowing process. Dysphagia can be a serious threat to one's health because of the risk of aspiration pneumonia, malnutrition, dehydration, weight loss, and airway obstruction. A number of etiologies have been attributed to dysphagia in populations with neurologic and nonneurologic conditions.

Disorders leading to dysphagia may affect the oral, pharyngeal, or esophageal phases of swallowing. Thorough history taking and careful physical examination are important in the diagnosis and treatment of dysphagia. The bedside physical should include examination of the neck, mouth, oropharynx, and larynx. A neurologic examination also should be performed. Several clinical bedside swallowing assessments have been suggested, but videofluoroscopic swallowing studies are accepted as the standard for detecting and evaluating swallowing abnormalities. This method not only allows estimation of risks of aspiration and respiratory complications but also helps in determining dietary and compensatory strategies.

Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing may be necessary. Disorders of oral and pharyngeal swallowing are usually amenable to rehabilitation, including dietary modification and training in swallowing techniques and maneuvers. Surgery is rarely indicated for patients with swallowing disorders. In patients with severe disorders, bypassing the oral cavity and pharynx in their entirety and providing enteral nutrition may be necessary. Options include percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and intermittent oroesophageal catheterization.

For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Cancer and Tumors Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education article Cancer of the Mouth and Throat.

Normal swallowing physiology

Central pattern generator

During swallowing, muscles are activated sequentially and orderly triggered by volitional cortical drive or peripheral sensory input. Once swallowing is initiated, the cascade of the sequential muscle activation does not essentially alter from the perioral muscles downward. Neural networks, which are responsible for this automatic swallowing, are called central pattern generator. The brain stem, including the nucleus tractus solitarius and nucleus ambiguus with the reticular formation linked to cranial motoneuron pools, is thought to be central pattern generator.

Three phases of swallowing

Deglutition is the act of swallowing, through which a food or liquid bolus is transported from the mouth through the pharynx and esophagus into the stomach. Normal deglutition is a smooth coordinated process that involves a complex series of voluntary and involuntary neuromuscular contractions and typically is divided into distinct phases: (1) oral, (2) pharyngeal, and (3) esophageal. Each stage facilitates a specific function, and, if stages are impaired by pathologic condition, specific symptoms may result.

Oral phase

The oral preparatory phase refers to processing of the bolus to render it swallowable, and the oral propulsive phase refers to the propelling of food from the oral cavity into the oropharynx. The process begins with contractions of the tongue and striated muscles of mastication. The muscles work in a coordinated fashion to mix the food bolus with saliva and propel it from the anterior oral cavity into the oropharynx, where the involuntary swallowing reflex is triggered.

The cerebellum controls output for the motor nuclei of cranial nerves V (trigeminal), VII (facial), and XII (hypoglossal).

With single swallows of liquid, the entire sequence lasts about 1 second. For swallows of solid foods, a delay of 5-10 seconds may elapse while the bolus accumulates in the oropharynx.

Pharyngeal phase

The pharyngeal phase is of particular importance because, without intact laryngeal protective mechanisms, aspiration is most likely to occur during this phase. This phase involves a rapid sequence of overlapping events. The soft palate rises. The hyoid bone and larynx move upward and forward. The vocal folds move to the midline, and the epiglottis folds backward to protect the airway. The tongue pushes backward and downward into the pharynx to propel the bolus down. The tongue is assisted by the pharyngeal walls, which move inward with a progressive wave of contraction from top to bottom.

The upper esophageal sphincter relaxes during the pharyngeal phase of swallowing and is pulled open by the forward movement of the hyoid bone and larynx. This sphincter closes after passage of the food, and the pharyngeal structures then return to reference position.

The pharyngeal phase of swallowing is involuntary and totally reflexive, so no pharyngeal activity occurs until the swallow reflex is triggered.

This swallowing reflex lasts approximately 1 second and involves the motor and sensory tracts from cranial nerves IX (glossopharyngeal) and X (vagus).

Esophageal phase

In the esophageal phase, the bolus is propelled downward by a peristaltic movement. The lower esophageal sphincter relaxes at initiation of the swallow, and this relaxation persists until the food bolus has been propelled into the stomach. Unlike the upper esophageal sphincter, the lower sphincter is not pulled open by extrinsic musculature. Rather, it closes after the bolus enters the stomach, thereby preventing gastroesophageal reflux.

The medulla controls this involuntary swallowing reflex, although voluntary swallowing may be initiated by the cerebral cortex.

An interval of 8-20 seconds may be required for contractions to drive the bolus into the stomach.

Pathophysiology

Disorders of swallowing may be categorized according to the swallowing phase affected. A number of dysphagic problems can be identified during each phase of deglutition.

Oral phase

Oral-phase disorders affecting the oral preparatory and oral propulsive phases usually result from impaired control of the tongue. Patients may have difficulty chewing solid food and initiating swallows. When drinking a liquid, patients may find it difficult to contain the liquid in the oral cavity before swallowing. As a result, liquid spills prematurely into the unprepared pharynx, often resulting in aspiration.

Logemann's Manual for the Videofluorographic Study of Swallowing cites the following oral-phase swallowing symptoms and disorders:

  • Cannot hold food in the mouth anteriorly due to reduced lip closure
  • Cannot form a bolus or residue on the floor of the mouth due to reduced range of tongue motion or coordination
  • Cannot hold a bolus due to reduced tongue shaping and coordination
  • Unable to align teeth due to reduced mandibular movement
  • Food material falls into anterior sulcus or residue in the anterior sulcus due to reduced labial tension or tone.
  • Food material falls into lateral sulcus or residue in the lateral sulcus due to reduced buccal tension or tone.
  • Abnormal hold position or material falls to the floor of the mouth due to tongue thrust or reduced tongue control
  • Delayed oral onset of swallow due to apraxia of swallow or reduced oral sensation
  • Searching motion or inability to organize tongue movements due to apraxia of swallow
  • Tongue moves forward to start the swallow due to tongue thrust.
  • Residue of food on the tongue due to reduced tongue range of movement or strength
  • Disturbed lingual contraction (peristalsis) due to lingual dyscoordination
  • Incomplete tongue-to-palate contact due to reduced tongue elevation
  • Unable to mash material due to reduced tongue elevation
  • Adherence of food to hard palate due to reduced tongue elevation or reduced lingual strength
  • Reduced anterior-posterior lingual action due to reduced lingual coordination
  • Repetitive lingual rolling in Parkinson disease
  • Uncontrolled bolus or premature loss of liquid or pudding consistency in to the pharynx due to reduced tongue control or linguavelar seal
  • Piecemeal deglutition
  • Delayed oral transit time

Pharyngeal phase

If pharyngeal clearance is impaired severely, a patient may be unable to ingest sufficient amounts of food and drink to sustain life. In people without dysphasia, small amounts of food commonly are retained in the valleculae or pyriform sinus after swallowing. In case of weakness or lack of coordination of the pharyngeal muscles, or poor opening of the upper esophageal sphincter, patients may retain excessive amounts of food in the pharynx and experience overflow aspiration after swallowing.

Logemann's Manual for the Videofluorographic Study of Swallowing cites the following pharyngeal-phase swallowing symptoms and disorders:

  • Delayed pharyngeal swallow
  • Nasal penetration during swallow due to reduced velopharyngeal closure
  • Pseudoepiglottis (after total laryngectomy) - Fold of mucosa at the base of the tongue
  • Cervical osteophytes
  • Coating of pharyngeal walls after the swallow due to reduced pharyngeal contraction bilaterally
  • Vallecular residue due to reduced posterior movement of the tongue base
  • Coating in a depression on the pharyngeal wall due to scar tissue or pharyngeal pouch
  • Residue at top of airway due to reduced laryngeal elevation
  • Laryngeal penetration and aspiration due to reduced closure of the airway entrance (arytenoid to base of epiglottis)
  • Aspiration during swallow due to reduced laryngeal closure
  • Stasis of residue in pyriform sinuses due to reduced anterior laryngeal pressure
  • Delayed pharyngeal transit time

Esophageal phase

Impaired esophageal function can result in retention of food and liquid in the esophagus after swallowing. This retention may result from mechanical obstruction, motility disorder, or impaired opening of the lower esophageal sphincter.

Logemann's Manual for the Videofluorographic Study of Swallowing cites the following swallowing symptoms and disorders of the esophageal phase:

  • Esophageal-to-pharyngeal backflow due to esophageal abnormality
  • Tracheoesophageal fistula
  • Zenker diverticulum
  • Reflux

Aspiration

Aspiration is the passage of food or liquid through the vocal folds. People who aspirate are at increased risk for pneumonia. People without swallowing abnormalities routinely aspirate microscopic amounts of food and liquid. Gross aspiration, however, is abnormal and may lead to respiratory complications.

Several factors influence the effects of aspiration: quantity, depth, physical properties of the aspirate, and pulmonary clearance mechanisms. Aspiration of larger quantities of material is riskier than aspiration of minute quantities of food or liquid. Aspirating material into the distal airways is more dangerous than aspiration into the vocal folds. Solid food may cause fatal airway obstruction. Acidic material is dangerous because the lungs are highly sensitive to caustic effects of acid. Aspirating material laden with infectious organisms or even normal mouth flora can cause bacterial pneumonitis. Pulmonary clearance mechanisms include ciliary action and coughing. Aspiration normally provokes a strong reflex cough. If sensation is impaired, silent aspiration may occur.

The severity of aspiration can be described in 2 ways: (1) Estimate the percentage of the total bolus aspirated or (2) estimate the depth of bolus invasion into the airway. The Eight-Point Penetration-Aspiration Scale is an example of an estimation tool.

Frequency

Dysphagia has been reported in several types of disorders, and it can be classified as neurologic or nonneurologic. Although dysphagia introduces many confounding variables, it also exerts a large influence on the outcome of rehabilitation (eg, length of hospital stay, mortality/morbidity of patient).

Neurologic swallowing disorders are encountered more frequently in rehabilitation medicine than in most other medical specialties. Stroke is the leading cause of neurologic dysphagia. Approximately 51-73% of patients with stroke have dysphagia, which is the most significant risk factor for development of pneumonia; this can also delay the patient's functional recovery.

Pneumonia accounts for about 34% of all stroke-related deaths and represents the third highest cause of death during the first month after a stroke, although not all these cases of pneumonia are attributable to aspiration of food. Therefore, early detection and treatment of dysphagia in patients who have sustained strokes is very critical.



Determine how the swallowing process is impaired and what stage is involved by means of careful clinical assessment or bedside evaluation.

History

Patients who have dysphagia may present with a variety of signs and symptoms. They usually report coughing or choking or the abnormal sensation of food sticking in the back of the throat or upper chest when they are trying to swallow; however, some of these presentations can be quite subtle or even absent (eg, in those with silent aspiration).

Signs and symptoms

  • Oral or pharyngeal dysphagia
    • Coughing or choking with swallowing
    • Difficulty initiating swallowing
    • Food sticking in the throat
    • Sialorrhea
    • Unexplained weight loss
    • Change in dietary habits
    • Recurrent pneumonia
    • Change in voice or speech (wet voice)
    • Nasal regurgitation
  • Esophageal dysphagia
    • Sensation of food sticking in the chest or throat
    • Oral or pharyngeal regurgitation
    • Change in dietary habits
    • Recurrent pneumonia

Causes

Careful history taking enables the physician to identify the numerous causes of dysphagia.

Frequent causes of dysphagia in rehabilitation medicine include the following:

  • Stroke or traumatic brain injury (TBI)
  • Motor neuron disease (eg, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [ALS])
  • Parkinson disease and other degenerative disorders (apraxia)
  • Poliomyelitis
  • Multiple sclerosis
  • Myasthenia gravis
  • Myopathy (dermatomyositis, myotonic dystrophy)
  • Laryngectomy
  • Pharyngectomy, esophagectomy reconstructed by gastric pull-up
  • Head and neck surgery (oral cavity cancer)
  • Cervical brace, cervical spondylosis
  • Ventilator-dependent patient
  • Elderly patients
  • Cerebral palsy and other movement disorders (mental retardation, developmental delay)
  • Disorders in the cervical esophageal aspect of deglutition (esophageal-pharyngeal backflow, tracheoesophageal [T-E] fistula, Zenker diverticulum, reflux)

Differential diagnosis and other problems to consider

Specific questions about onset, duration, and severity of dysphagia and a variety of associated symptoms may help narrow the differential diagnoses (see Differentials, below) to a specific diagnosis or to an anatomic or pathophysiologic diagnosis. Review the patient's general health information, including long-term illnesses and current prescription medications.

Mucosal injury may be caused by potassium chloride tablets, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and antibiotics (eg, doxycycline, tetracycline, clindamycin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole). Xerostomia may be caused by anticholinergics, alpha-adrenergic blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and antihistamines.

The patient's history is often useful in identifying esophageal dysphagia. The history also should be directed at eliciting information about symptoms related to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) including heartburn, belching, sour regurgitation, and water brash.

Physical examination

During the physical examination, look for oral-motor and laryngeal mechanisms. Testing of cranial nerves V and VII-XII is essential for determining physical evidence of oropharyngeal dysphagia.

Direct observation of lip closure, jaw closure, chewing and mastication, tongue mobility and strength, palatal and laryngeal elevation, salivation, and oral sensitivity is necessary.

Check the patient's level of alertness and cognitive status because they can impact the safety of swallowing and ability to learn compensatory measures.

Dysphonia and dysarthria are signs of motor dysfunction of the structures involved in oral and pharyngeal swallowing.

Inspect the oral cavity and pharynx for mucosal integrity and dentition.

Examine the soft palate for position and symmetry during phonation and at rest.

Evaluate pharyngeal elevation by placing 2 fingers on the larynx and assessing movement during a volitional swallow. This technique helps to identify the presence or absence of key laryngeal protective mechanisms.

The gag reflex is elicited by stroking the pharyngeal mucosa with a tongue depressor. Testing for the gag reflex is helpful, but absence of a gag reflex does not necessarily indicate that a patient is unable to swallow safely. Indeed, many people with no gag reflex have normal swallowing, and some patients with dysphagia have a normal gag reflex. Pulling of the palate to 1 side during testing of the gag reflex indicates weakness of the muscles of the contralateral palate and suggests unilateral bulbar pathology.

Cervical auscultation becomes part of the clinical evaluation of dysphagic patients. Assess sound strength and clarity, timing of apneic episode, and speed of swallowing.

Assessing respiratory function also is essential. If respiratory force of a cough or clearing the throat is inadequate, the risk of aspiration is increased.

The final step in physical examination is direct observation of the act of swallowing. At a minimum, watch the patient while he or she drinks a few ounces of water. If possible, assess the patient's eating of various food textures. Sialorrhea, delayed swallow initiation, coughing, a wet or hoarse voice quality may indicate a problem. After the swallow, observe the patient for 1 minute or more to see if delayed cough response is present. DePippo et al suggested a swallow test with 3 oz. of water, which helped in identifying 80% of patients with stroke who were subsequently found to be aspirating on videofluoroscopic study.

Differentials

Oropharyngeal dysphagia

  • Cerebrovascular accident
  • Parkinson disease
  • Brainstem tumors
  • Degenerative diseases, such as ALS, multiple sclerosis (MS), Huntington disease
  • Poliomyelitis, syphilis
  • Peripheral neuropathy
  • Myasthenia gravis
  • Polymyositis, dermatomyositis, muscular dystrophy (myotonic dystrophy, oculopharyngeal dystrophy)
  • Cricopharyngeal achalasia
  • Obstructive lesions, such as tumors, inflammatory masses, Zenker diverticulum, esophageal webs, extrinsic structural lesions, anterior mediastinal masses, and cervical spondylosis

Esophageal dysphagia

  • Achalasia
  • Spastic motor disorders, such as diffuse esophageal spasm, hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter, nutcracker esophagus
  • Scleroderma
  • Obstructive lesions, such as tumors, strictures, lower esophageal rings (Schatzki ring), esophageal webs, foreign bodies, vascular compression, mediastinal masses



Laboratory evaluation

Initial laboratory evaluations should be limited to specific studies based on the differential diagnosis. Obtain a CBC to screen for infectious or inflammatory conditions. Nutritional assessment may aid in determining serum protein and albumin levels. Thyroid function studies may help in detecting dysphagia associated with hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism.

Imaging studies

Chest radiography is a simple assessment for pneumonia.

Ultrasonography depicts only the region of the tongue posterior to the hyoid and may aid in the evaluation of submucosal and extramural lesions of the esophagus.

CT and MRI provide excellent definition of structural abnormalities, particularly when used to evaluate patients with suspected CNS causes of dysphagia.

Special studies

Videofluorographic swallowing study

The terms videofluorographic swallowing study (VFSS) and modified barium swallow (MBS) often are used interchangeably.

Some clinical researchers think that they can identify patients with potential to develop pneumonia by interpreting findings of the bedside test. However, most clinical researchers agree that videofluoroscopy is the standard for identifying patients who have potential to develop pneumonia and for diagnosing aspiration and swallowing problems from potential discrepancies between findings of bedside tests and videofluoroscopy.

Splaingard et al reported that only 42% of patients who had aspiration on videofluoroscopy were identified as having abnormalities with the bedside test. This finding indicated that bedside results are not sufficient for evaluating frequency of aspiration. In general, 40-70% of patients have silent aspiration, which does not manifest specific symptoms.

Videofluoroscopy is designed to study the anatomy and physiology of the oral, pharyngeal, and esophageal stages of deglutition and to define treatment strategies to improve swallowing safety or efficiency of the patient with dysphagia.

If aspiration occurs or if food is retained after the patient swallows, the next step is to evaluate the quantity of retained food, the mechanism of retention or aspiration, and the patient's response. In general, various food consistencies, volumes, postural techniques, and swallowing maneuvers to enhance swallowing efficiency or safety are tested during the study, and clinical decisions (eg, changing food groups, finding appropriate swallowing postures or maneuvers) are made. This study is expensive because of the special expertise, equipment, and facilities required.

Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing

A transnasal laryngoscope is used to assess pharyngeal swallowing. The procedure is a sensitive technique for detecting premature bolus loss, laryngeal penetration, tracheal aspiration, and pharyngeal residue. Because pharyngeal contraction obstructs the lumen, the fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing (FEES) does not show motion of essential food pathway structures or the food bolus during the swallow.

Swallowing is directly evaluated by using measured quantities of food colored with blue liquid dye. FEES may be helpful when VFSS is not feasible (eg, in critically ill patients unable to tolerate any risk of aspiration, patients in intensive care units who cannot be transferred to the fluoroscopy room, patients who require prompt evaluation).

Scintigraphy

Scintigraphy has limited value in evaluating pharyngeal swallowing disorders. This test is useful in quantitative and qualitative evaluation of subglottic aspiration, esophageal motility disorders, and gastroesophageal reflux.

Oropharyngeal transit time can be measured through time-activity curves constructed from a specific region of interest (ROI) of the mouth, pharynx, and esophagus. Peaks and nadirs of the first derivative curve correspond to peak emptying or filling rates of the respective regions.

Reflex cough test

For this test, a 20% solution of L-tartaric acid is dissolved in 2 mL of sterile normal saline. Using a nasal nebulizer, the patient inhales the solution, which stimulates cough receptors in the vestibule of the larynx and initiates the laryngeal cough reflex.

The laryngeal cough reflex protects the laryngeal aditus from significant aspiration and reduces risk of respiratory complications (eg, pneumonia). An impaired laryngeal cough reflex may permit laryngeal penetration and increase risk of aspiration pneumonia. An acute cerebrovascular accident often appears to affect the protective cough reflex.

Addington et al used the reflex cough test and identified 100% of patients with stroke who were subsequently found to be free of pneumonia (specificity of 100%).

Swallowing electromyography

Mechanical upward-downward movement of the larynx is detected by using a piezoelectric sensor while submental integrated electromyography (EMG) activity is recorded during dry and wet swallowing. EMG activity of the cricopharyngeal muscle of the upper esophageal sphincter also can be recorded.

In patients with muscular disorders, laryngeal elevators are involved, whereas the cricopharyngeal sphincter is intact. In patients with clinical signs of involvement of the corticobulbar fiber (eg, patients with ALS and pseudobulbar palsy), dyscoordination between paretic laryngeal elevators and the hyperreflexic cricopharyngeal sphincter is present.

EMG can be used for both muscle selection and performing injections of botulinum toxin in patients with dysphagia caused by cricopharyngeus muscle spasm or hypertonicity.

Laryngeal EMG

Laryngeal EMG can help the clinician diagnose oropharyngeal dysphagia of peripheral nerve origin (eg, recurrent laryngeal or superior laryngeal nerve injury).

Manometry

Manometry is performed to assess motor function of the esophagus. A catheter with several electronic pressure probes is passed into the stomach to measure esophageal contractions and to define upper and lower esophageal responses to swallowing. Manometry reveals definitive abnormalities in only 25% of patients with nonobstructive lesions; therefore, its clinical use in oropharyngeal dysphagia is limited.

Esophageal pH monitoring

Esophageal pH monitoring is the criterion standard for diagnosing reflux disease. A nasogastric probe is inserted into the patient's esophagus to record pH levels. These levels are compared with the patient's record of symptoms over 24 hours to determine whether acid reflux contributes to his or her symptoms.

Endoscopy

Gastroesophageal endoscopy enables the best assessment of the esophageal mucosa. Endoscopy has the added benefits of permitting the detection of infection and erosions and of enabling biopsy.



Various treatments have been suggested for the treatment of oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults. Direct and indirect strategies for treating dysphagia have been described. Direct usually refers to treatment that involves food, whereas indirect refers to an exercise regimen performed without food bolus. Direct techniques include modifications of food consistency, whereas indirect techniques include stimulation of the oropharyngeal structures and the adoption of behavioral techniques, such as postural changes or the swallow maneuver.

Our understanding of swallowing physiology and of the effect of swallowing maneuvers and exercises on the underlying physiology has noticeably improved. The literature shows a trend from simple descriptive articles to scientific articles, which include the measurement of treatment efficacy.

The Dietetics in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation dietetic practice group conceived the National Dysphagia Diet project in 1996. Growing frustration regarding lack of standardization for solid-food textures and liquid consistencies, as well as nomenclature, led to formation of a task force to study the issue and to formulate a new diet based on scientific food properties and clinical swallowing problems.

Dietary modification

Dietary modification is the key component in the general treatment program of dysphagia. A diet of pureed foods is recommended for patients who have difficulties with the oral preparatory phase of swallowing, who pocket food in the buccal recesses, or who have significant pharyngeal retention of chewed solid foods.

As patients' swallowing function improves, their dysphagic diet may be advanced to the next level of soft and semisolid foods with regular consistencies. Recommend alternating bites with sips, bite or sip size, and numbers of swallows per size to patients.

Viscosity and texture

If oral feedings are determined to be appropriate, the viscosity and texture of the food should be considered because patients vary in their ability to swallow thin and thick liquids. Liquids can be thickened with various thickening agents. Many commercially available starch-based food thickeners are used to increase the consistency of food, and prethickened water, juice, coffee, and other products are available.

Food viscosity is defined as frictional resistance to shear. Viscosity of the diet for dysphagia is frequently described in a nonobjective manner. For example, tomato juice, nectar, honey, and pudding have been referred to as fluids. Viscosity can be objectively determined by using a device called a viscometer.

A uniform and viscous bolus of food or beverage enables a patient with delayed swallow reflex to control mastication and transport and to swallow with less risk of aspirating residue material because of reduction of the tendency for the material to fall over the base of the tongue before the swallow mechanism is triggered. Viscosity also influences the swallowing reflex and peristaltic activity.

Another objective method is a line-spread test. Diluted mix is placed on a circle marked on a glass plate and allowed to stream for 5 minutes. Lengths of the 4 stream directions are measured, and their mean is determined.

Food texture is defined as the group of physical properties derived from the structure of the food that can be sensed by touch. Touch usually is performed by elements of the oral and pharyngeal cavities. Food and liquid textures play important roles in the care of patients with dysphagia.

Sample classification of dysphagia diet according to viscosity

The dysphagia diet can be classified according to viscosity as follows: Level I = pudding, crushed potato, and ground meat. Level II = curd-type yogurt, orange juice (3% thickener mixed), cream soup, and thin soup with starch. Level III = tomato juice; fluid-type yogurt; and thick, fluid rice. Level IV = water and orange juice.

Nutritional supply

The effect of dysphagia on the patient's nutritional status is profound. As the patient's ability to swallow becomes impaired, adequate dietary intake becomes a challenge, and vice versa. Therefore, early detection and management of dysphagia are critical to halt malnutrition.

Malnutrition is a risk factor for pneumonia because it renders patients susceptible to altered colonization in the oropharynx and because it reduces resistance to infection by depressing the immune system. It may also lead to lethargy, weakness, and reduced alertness, all of which may increase the probability of aspiration. Malnutrition may reduce the strength of cough and the mechanical clearance of the lungs. It also contributes to overall functional decline, muscle breakdown, osteoporosis, osteopenia, iron-deficiency anemia, skin breakdown, and poor wound healing.

Therefore, in addition to dysphagia screening, formal nutritional assessment is necessary in high-risk patients. Nutritional needs are determined by means of thorough body composition analysis, clinical examination, and biochemical assessment. Energy, protein, and fluid requirements must also be assessed.

In an investigation of the nutritional status of patients admitted to a rehabilitation service, 49% of all patients admitted for stroke were malnourished, and 65% of those admitted for stroke with dysphagia were malnourished.

Many commercial products are available to provide nutritional support. In addition to thickening agents, prethickened beverages, prepacked puree molds, oral liquid supplements, and modular components can be added to enhance the patient's caloric and protein intake. When oral is inadequate, enteral nutrition is indicated.

Hydration

Dysphagia can lead to dehydration, and the patient's hydration status must be closely monitored because fluid intake is restricted in most patients with dysphagia. Conversely, dehydration may also be a risk factor for pneumonia because it decreases salivary flow, which promotes altered colonization of the oropharynx, and it may lead to lethargy and mental confusion and increased aspiration, making the person susceptible to infection by depressing the immune system.

The hydration state of a patient can be assessed by using input and output records, laboratory values (eg, serum osmolality), and physical indicators (eg, dry mucous membranes, poor skin turgor, darkened urine).

Adequate fluid intake can be achieved by means simple interventions, such as by systematically offering patients preferred liquids or foods with high fluid contents (eg, pureed fruits and vegetables, hot cereals, custards, puddings) and by having an adequate number of supervised staff to help them drink while properly positioned. Intravenous fluids or water boluses given via a feeding tube may be necessary if hydration cannot be maintained.

Oral hygiene and dental care

Oral hygiene and dental care is important. Dried secretions that accumulate on the tongue and palate reduce oral sensitivity and promote bacterial growth. The elderly have an increased incidence of oropharyngeal colonization with respiratory pathogens, a well-known risk factor for pneumonia. Changes in the oral milieu may occur secondary to decreased salivary production and abnormalities in swallowing. These abnormalities may result in the impaired clearance of organisms, allowing for pathogenic colonization. A dependence on oral care is associated with poor oral health, subsequent weight loss and malnutrition, and altered colonization of the oropharynx.

The provision of oral care is extremely important when working to prevent pneumonia. Lemon glycerin swabs or a damp washcloth can be used to remove the secretions.

Exercise and facilitation techniques

Two types of exercise can be recommended to the patient with dysphagia: indirect (eg, exercises to strengthen swallowing muscles) and direct (eg, exercises to be performed while swallowing). Exercises designed to facilitate oral motor strength, range of motion (ROM), and coordination usually are performed 5-10 times per day.

Sample exercises

Lip exercises can facilitate the patient's ability to prevent food or liquid from leaking out of the oral cavity.

Tongue exercises are used to facilitate manipulation of the bolus and its propulsion through the oral cavity or to facilitate retraction of the tongue base. Passive ROM and active-assistive ROM exercise concepts also can be applied in this technique.

Jaw exercises help to facilitate the rotatory movements of mastication.

Respiratory exercises (eg, resistive straw sucking, coughing, incentive spirometer) are recommended to improve respiratory strength.

Vocal cord adduction exercises can promote strengthening of weak vocal cords.

Tongue-holding maneuvers facilitate compensatory anterior movement of the posterior pharyngeal wall.

Head-lift exercises increase anterior movement of the hyolaryngeal complex and opening of the upper esophageal sphincter. Patients lie flat and are instructed to keep their shoulders on the floor as they raise their heads high enough to see their toes and maintain this position for 1 minute. They repeat this activity 3 times, followed by 30 consecutive repetitions of the same action. Patients should perform this exercise 3 times a day for several weeks.

Examples of facilitation techniques

Electrical stimulation can be applied for dysphagia.

Somatosensory input influences motor function, and oral sensory deficit is associated with increased tendency toward aspiration. Somatosensory stimulation in the form of an electrical current applied to the pharynx changed the excitability of the corticobulbar projection and induced cortical reorganization in patients with poststroke dysphagia.

Electrical stimulation is administered by using a modified, handheld, battery-powered electrical stimulator connected to a pair of electrodes positioned on the neck. This technique is comparable to neuromuscular stimulation or functional electrical stimulation applied to the limb.

Deep pharyngeal neuromuscular stimulation (DPNS) is a therapeutic program that uses the afferent-efferent cycle (ie, sensory stimulation-motor response) to improve pharyngeal swallow. DPNS focuses on stimulating 3 reflex sites with frozen lemon-glycerin swabs. The first site is the bitter taste buds and tongue base for improving tongue base retraction. Second is the soft palate for palatal elevation, and the third is the superior and medial pharyngeal constrictor for improving pharyngeal peristalsis and cricopharyngeal opening.

Tactile-thermal stimulation (TTS) can be used to increase the speed of swallow. TTS involves the application of cold by rubbing the bilateral anterior facial arch with a laryngeal mirror that has been placed in ice. The purpose is to sensitize the area of the oral cavity where the swallow is triggered.

The bite reflex can be inhibited by applying sustained pressure to the tongue with a rubber seizure stick in the chin-tuck position.

Facilitation of the hypoactive gag reflex by applying a tongue depressor or quick tap to the arch of the soft palate. A hyperactive gag can be desensitized by using firm pressure with a tongue depressor advancing farther back in the mouth.

Compensatory techniques

Maintaining oral feeding often requires compensatory techniques to reduce aspiration or improve pharyngeal clearance. Several examples of compensatory techniques are described below.

The chin-tuck position decreases the space between the base of the tongue and the posterior pharyngeal wall, creating increased pharyngeal pressure to move the bolus through the pharyngeal region. The chin tuck often is helpful for patients with delayed swallow reflex because it narrows the airway entrance and increases the vallecular space, increasing probability that the bolus remains in the vallecular before triggering of the pharyngeal swallow. In this way, the risk of aspiration is decreased.

Rotation of the head to the affected side closes the pyriform sinus on that side and directs food down the opposite or stronger side. This posture also adds external pressure on the damaged vocal cord and moves it toward the midline, improving airway closure.

Tilting the head to the strong side tends to direct bolus down that side, both in the oral cavity and in the pharynx. This technique also is effective for patients who have unilateral tongue dysfunction or unilateral pharyngeal disorders.

Lying on one's side or back during swallowing sometimes prevents aspiration after the swallow. This posture often is helpful for patients who aspirate after swallow because of residue in the pharynx. They aspirate because gravity drops the residual food into the airway when they inhale after the swallow.

Maneuvers

Voluntary maneuvers to protect the airway

The supraglottic swallow is a technique designed to close the airway voluntarily before and during the swallow, protecting the trachea from aspiration. This technique can be useful for patients who have reduced laryngeal closure. Most patients can master this technique. Advise the patient to practice these steps: (1) Take a deep breath and hold your breath. (2) Keep holding your breath and lightly cover your tracheostomy tube, if applicable. (3) Keep holding your breath while you swallow. (4) Cough immediately after the swallow.

The extended supraglottic swallow is helpful for patients with severe reductions in tongue mobility or severely reduced tongue bulk due to surgical procedures for oral cancer because they essentially have little or no oral transit. Advise these patients to learn the following technique: (1) Hold your breath firmly. (2) Put the entire 5-10 mL of liquid in your mouth. (3) Continue to hold your breath and toss your head back, thus dumping the liquid into the pharynx as a whole. (4) Swallow 2-3 times or as many times as needed to clear the majority of the liquid while continuing to hold your breath. (5) Cough to clear any residue from the pharynx.

The supersupraglottic swallow incorporates the supraglottic swallow with Valsalva effect. This technique is designed to close the airway entrance voluntarily by tilting the arytenoid cartilage anteriorly to the base of the epiglottis before and during swallow. This strategy is used in patients with reduced closure of the airway entrance, particularly those who have undergone supraglottic laryngectomy.

Voluntary maneuvers to improve clearance of the bolus

The effortful swallow is designed to improve posterior tongue-base movement and thus improve clearance of the bolus from the valleculae. Patients are instructed to swallow hard.

The Mendelson maneuver is used to improve laryngeal elevation and cricopharyngeal opening during the swallow. Patients are instructed to swallow and to hold the swallow for 2-3 seconds, then to complete the swallow and relax when the pharynx is in the uppermost stage. Repeated swallow and washing food through the pharynx may be helpful to patients who have excessive residue in the pharynx after the swallow.

Other maneuvers

The Shaker exercise is a head lift designed to increase anterior movement of the hyolaryngeal complex and opening of the upper esophageal sphincter.

The Heimlich maneuver is used to dislodge food that the patient cannot cough out of the airway. The maneuver consists of wrapping one's arms around the upper abdomen of the victim from behind and squeezing mightily and quickly in a brief but fervent hug.

Other techniques

Biofeedback

Biofeedback can be useful for oral motor and facial exercises. The patient also receives feedback on the actual swallow.

Enteral feeding methods

In some patients, enteral feeding may be necessary to bypass the oral cavity and pharynx. In general, enteral feeding is indicated in any patient who is unable to achieve adequate alimentation and hydration by mouth. Patients with an impaired level of consciousness, massive aspiration, silent aspiration, esophageal obstruction, or recurrent respiratory infections fall into this category. There has been some controversy regarding the most appropriate mode and method of administering enteral feeding (e.g., continuous or intermittent, intestinal or gastric)

Nasoenteric tube feeding

Nasoenteric tube (NGT) feeding is commonly method of enteral feeding. In patients with short-term life expectancies, nasoenteric feeding is a more appropriate route for enteral nutrition. Insertion of a NGT is easy, quick, relatively non-invasive, requires little training, and has negligible mortality. However, many patients find the NGT uncomfortable and repeatedly pull the tube out, which results in interrupted feeding and potential malnutrition.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) has several advantages over surgical gastrostomy, including reduced procedure time, cost, recovery time, and no need for general anesthesia. However, PEG also requires the invasive insertion of the feeding tube through the anterior abdominal wall, which can be complicated by bleeding, peritonitis or perforation of other abdominal organs, chest infections, local infection around the insertion site, and tubes being pulled out.

Relative contraindications for PEG are aspiration pneumonia due to gastroesophageal reflux, significant ascites, and morbid obesity. Prospective randomized trials have shown increased compliance, convenience, and continuity of feeding with PEG tubes compared with nasogastric intubation.

Oroesophageal tube feeding

Campbell-Taylor et al introduced oroesophageal tube feeding in 1988. Patients who refuse nasogastric or gastrostomy tubes can use this method. The patient is taught to insert the 14F urethral tube into the mouth past the side of the tongue and to push slowly until the catheter end reaches the lips. Food supplements and liquid are administered by means of a 500-mL syringe at a rate of approximately 50 mL/min.

The absence of gag reflex indicates the possible need for oroesophageal tube feeding. The patient must be cooperative and alert but need not be completely cognitively intact. This method is relatively contraindicated in patients with hyperexaggerated gag reflex, esophagitis, Zenker diverticulum, or anteriorly directed cervical osteophytes.

This method has several advantages. First, oroesophageal tube feeding may prevent the harmful effects of continuous NGT feeding. Second, the speed of pouring liquids can be faster than with NGT feedings. Third, oroesophageal tube feeding provides the training for facilitating the swallowing reflex.

A couple of disadvantages should be noted. First, performance of this procedure requires skillful technique. Second, the need for frequent manipulation (6 times per day) may be troublesome for the assistant.

Use adaptive equipment

Adaptive equipment for patients who have difficulty with the motor or perceptual components of feeding compensates for decreased upper extremity functions of limited grasp, incoordination, decreased ROM, and hemiparesis. Rocker knives, swivel utensils, built-up handles on utensils, scoop dishes, nonskid mats, and large-handled cups are examples.

Surgical intervention

Surgery rarely is indicated in patients with oral or pharyngeal dysphagia, but it can be effective in selected patients.

Surgical gastrostomy

Surgical placement of a gastrostomy tube requires a laparotomy under general or local anesthesia. This procedure is more expensive and has a greater morbidity than PEG.

Cricopharyngeal myotomy

Cricopharyngeal myotomy (CPM) is a procedure designed to decrease pressure on the pharyngoesophageal sphincter (PES) by incising the main muscular component of the PES. However, no means of precisely determining the underlying PES dysfunction exists. For this reason, no rational guidelines have been compiled for recommending CPM.

Even less certain is the advisability of performing a CPM in patients with neurogenic dysphagia, such as patients with stroke. The fact that neurogenic causes of dysphagia usually involve a lack of coordination of the swallow, rather than any intrinsic or extrinsic muscle dysfunction, probably explains this consideration.

The injection of botulinum toxin injection into the PES has been introduced as a replacement for CPM.

Surgery for chronic aspiration

Surgery for chronic aspiration may involve tracheostomy, medialization, laryngeal suspension, laryngeal closure, and/or laryngotracheal separation-diversion.

A tracheostomy tube worsens dysphagia by tethering the trachea to the skin and decreasing laryngeal elevation over time.

Medialization helps restore glottic closure and subglottic pressure during the swallow.

With laryngeal suspension, the larynx in a relatively protected position under the tongue base.

Laryngeal closure may be performed to close the glottis off to protect the airway at the expense of phonation.

Laryngotracheal separation-diversion may be done to separate the airway from the alimentary tract. In the acute setting, when the need to decrease the aspiration of secretions is urgent, a tracheostomy is a simple and effective choice. However, in a chronic situation when the patient has no likelihood of recovering a safe swallow and voice, laryngectomy is the most effective choice. In patients for whom recovery of voice and swallowing function is uncertain but aspiration of secretions is life threatening, temporary laryngeal closure of diversion procedure can be used.

Medical issues

Aspiration pneumonia

Dysphagia is a risk factor for pneumonia, both directly and indirectly. However, only 9-13% of patients who aspirated in an instrumental swallow study developed pneumonia. Dysphagia and aspiration are necessary but not sufficient conditions for pneumonia. Malnutrition and dehydration are other established risk factors for pneumonia.

Malnutrition

Patients who have had a stroke are likely to decrease their dietary intake, which increases their risk of malnutrition or which exacerbates existing malnourishment. In an investigation of the nutritional status of patients with stroke who were admitted to a rehabilitation service, 49% had malnutrition, and 65% of those with dysphagia were malnourished.

In another study, no differences were found in the nutritional parameters of patients admitted for stroke with or without dysphagia on admission. However, after 1 week, 48.3% of the patients with dysphagia were malnourished, but only 13.6% of those without dysphagia were malnourished.

Malnutrition is a risk factor for pneumonia because it renders the person susceptible to altered colonization in the oropharynx and reduced resistance to infection by depressing the immune system. Malnutrition may also lead to lethargy, weakness, and reduced alertness, all of which may increase the probability of aspiration. In addition, malnutrition it may reduce the strength of cough and mechanical clearance in the lungs.

Dehydration

Dysphagia can potentially lead to dehydration. Conversely, dehydration also may be a risk factor for pneumonia for several reasons. First, it decreases salivary flow, which promotes altered colonization of the oropharynx. Second, it may lead to lethargy and mental confusion and increased aspiration. Third, it makes the person susceptible to infection by depressing the immune system.



Stroke patients recover swallowing function gradually, and therapeutic interventions for dysphagia generally are successful. In 1 prospective investigation of 128 patients admitted because of acute stroke, a swallowing abnormality was detected in 51% on clinical examination and in 64% on videofluoroscopy at initial presentation. At 6 months after stroke, 87% of patients had returned to their prestroke diet.

In a study of 124 patients with acute stroke, 39% of patients had failing results on initial swallow screening. However, no patients developed aspiration pneumonia because of early management (eg, altered dietary texture) of their dysphagia. Early swallow screening and dysphagia management in patients with acute stroke reduces their risk of aspiration pneumonia, it is cost effective, and it helps ensure good-quality care with optimal outcomes.

Recovery from dysphagia is associated with increased pharyngeal representation in the brain, suggesting brain reorganization in recovery.

Several scales have been suggested to determine patients' functional outcomes. One of them is the Swallowing Rating Scale, which y the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) suggested to systematically describe the functional severity of dysphagia. The categories are as follows:

  • Level 0: Patient cannot be tested.
  • Level 1: Swallowing is not functional.
  • Level 2: Swallowing inconsistent and/or delayed swallow, which prevents eating to meet nutritional needs, but some swallowing is possible.
  • Level 3: Swallowing disorder prevents eating for a portion of nutritional needs, and supervision is required for eating.
  • Level 4: Swallowing disorder does not prevent eating to meet nutritional needs, although general supervision is required to ensure use of compensatory techniques.
  • Level 5: Swallowing is functional enough to meet nutritional needs although self-monitoring and compensatory techniques are used. Patient may need occasional cueing, feeding with special techniques, and modifications.
  • Level 6: Swallowing is functional for most eating activity although mild difficulty may occur periodically. Additional time may be necessary for eating.
  • Level 7: Swallowing is normal in all situations.



Patients with a tracheostomy

The frequency of aspiration in patients with a tracheostomy is 50-83%. The tracheostomy tube affects airway protection and swallowing in many ways. It impairs the glottic closure reflex, it reduces subglottic pressure, it reduces laryngeal elevation, it impairs hypopharyngeal and laryngeal sensation, and it leads to disuse muscle atrophy.

Tracheostomy alters the essence of normal respiratory flow by diverting air through the neck instead of the pharynx, especially when an inflated tracheostomy-tube cuff is present. The previous belief that an inflated tracheostomy tube cuff prevents aspiration of food has been refuted. An inflated cuff causes secretions to stagnate and collect above it, and these secretions can trickle down past the cuff and potentially lead to infection. Increasing the pressure of the may lead to malacia, stenosis, fistula of the tracheal wall, or dragging of the cuff on the larynx as larynx elevates during the swallow (laryngeal excursion).

Subglottic airway pressure is disrupted in patients with open tracheostomy tubes. The expiratory phase is shortened because the function of the normal vocal folds to maintain lung volumes throughout the physiologic prolongation of the expiratory phase is impaired. Furthermore, reduced subglottic pressure precludes effective coughing. Superior and anterior laryngeal excursion during swallowing facilitates vertical closure of the laryngeal vestibule, assisting in airway protection and opening of the upper esophageal sphincter. The tracheostomy tube may attach the larynx to the surrounding neck tissue, anchoring it in position and reducing laryngeal elevation.

The tracheostomy desensitizes laryngeal and hypopharyngeal receptors, delaying onset of the laryngeal adductor reflex response and leading to aspiration. The sensory response, and hence the organization of the swallowing mechanism, can be improved by restoring the transglottic airflow by downsizing the tracheostomy tube, placing a fenestrated tube, or occluding the tracheostomy tube with a cap or with a speaking 1-way valve.

Endotracheal intubation also affects swallowing function directly and indirectly. The direct effect of the endotracheal tube on laryngeal structures is caused by laryngeal trauma, which manifests as vocal-fold and supraglottic edema, granulation tissue in the posterior larynx, subluxation of 1 or both arytenoid cartilages, and permanent or temporary palsy of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Supraglottic and glottic edema reduces the patient's ability to sense the presence of secretions in the larynx or hypopharynx, which can in turn inhibit the timely triggering of the pharyngeal swallow response, causing aspiration.

Indirect effects on swallowing caused by endotracheal intubation relate to the coordination required between respiration and the swallowing function. Increased respiratory rate in patients with suboptimal oxygenation can disrupt the regular swallowing and respiration pattern and predispose the patient to aspiration of saliva and secretions. For example, continuous positive airway pressure delays the latency of the swallow response and reduces the number of swallows because it alters the peripheral sensory receptors that assist with the triggering of a pharyngeal swallow.

To restore glottic closure, subglottic pressures, and transglottic airflow, 1-way speaking valves are used. The value of the occlusion of the tracheostomy tube may be related to the provision of a closed aerodigestive tract, which enables the patient to effectively react to aspiration. Other important benefits include improved communication, improved olfaction, and assistance with decannulation. Restoration of glottic function can also be accomplished by downsizing the standard cuffed tracheostomy tube toward stepwise decannulation.

Patients receiving mechanical ventilation often cannot control the duration of inspiratory and expiratory airflow. Therefore, ventilator settings, such as tidal volume and flow rate, may need to be adjusted during meals. (Tidal volume may need to be increased, and flow rate may need to be reduced. The patient may have to relearn the inspiratory and expiratory phases of the breathing cycle for optimal coordination with swallowing.

Dysphagia in pediatric patients

Certain factors make dysphagia in children unique. Successful oral feeding and growth in infants and children depend not only on functional deglutition but also on a broad range of neurodevelopmental skills involving sensory systems, cognition, communication, and gross and fine motor behaviors.

Prematurity by itself and neurologic impairment (eg, cerebral palsy) are common causes of dysphagia in young patients. Children with cerebral palsy typically manage solid boluses more easily than liquid boluses and small liquid boluses more easily than large liquid boluses.

Congenital structural lesions (eg, choanal atresia, cleft lip and palate, craniofacial syndromes) can interfere with normal anatomic transport of a bolus. Prosthetic devices or adaptive feeding equipment may be necessary.

GERD is a common problem in children. Choking, food refusal, and food "getting stuck" are nonspecific symptoms that may arise because of reflux and esophagitis.

Childhood achalasia appears to be more common in boys than in girls. Regurgitation of food and dysphagia are the most common symptoms. In about 18% of patients, symptoms begin during infancy.

Management of pediatric dysphagia requires a special approach. Cognitive, developmental, and behavioral issues can affect the treatment options. Treatment does not necessarily imply feeding therapy. Tone abnormalities, postural control, adverse behavior, and primitive reflexes should be managed. Hypoxemia can occur while a child with dysphagia eats, so pulse oximetry during mealtime can be useful.

Dysphagia in geriatric patients

The prevalence of dysphagia increases with age, and dysphagia is a major healthcare problem in elderly patients. Normal aging alters some aspects of the swallowing function. Problems include increased oral and pharyngeal transit times, poor bolus control and coordination, increased magnitude and duration of pharyngeal pressures, and increased incidence of pharyngeal residue after swallowing.

Other factors (eg, poor dentition, atrophy of the tongue and alveolar ridge, diminished taste and smell sensitivity, decreased muscle tone, increased ligamentous laxity, limited laryngeal elevation) can cause a predisposition to dysphagia or aggravate the condition.



Media file 1:  Lateral projection of the videoprint of a videographic swallowing study shows the epiglottis (E), pyriform sinuses (P), tongue (Tg), trachea (Tr), and vallecula (V).
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  X-RAY

Media file 2:  Lateral projection of the videoprint of a videographic swallowing study shows residues on vallecula (Vr) and pyriform sinuses (Pr) and a small amount of aspirated liquid barium in the trachea (As).
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  X-RAY

Media file 3:  Anterior projection of the videoprint of a videographic swallowing study shows residues on the vallecula (Vr) and pyriform sinuses (Pr).
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  X-RAY

Media file 4:  Lateral projection of the videoprint of a videographic swallowing study shows supraglottic penetration.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  X-RAY

Media file 5:  Lateral projection of the videoprint of a videographic swallowing study shows subglottic aspiration.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  X-RAY

Media file 6:  Delayed posteroanterior chest image shows aspiration of liquid barium into the distal bronchus.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  X-RAY

Media file 7: 
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
 
Media type: 



  • ASPEN. American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Supplement to nutrition in clinical practice. 1999;14(5):S1-73.
  • Addington WR, Stephens RE, Gilliland K, Rodriguez M. Assessing the laryngeal cough reflex and the risk of developing pneumonia after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Feb 1999;80(2):150-4. [Medline].
  • Campbell-Taylor I, Nadon GW, Sclater AL, et al. Oro-esophageal tube feeding: an alternative to nasogastric or gastrostomy tubes. Dysphagia. 1988;2(4):220-1. [Medline].
  • DePippo KL, Holas MA, Reding MJ. Validation of the 3-oz water swallow test for aspiration following stroke. Arch Neurol. Dec 1992;49(12):1259-61. [Medline].
  • Ertekin C, Aydogdu I, Yuceyar N, et al. Electrodiagnostic methods for neurogenic dysphagia. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. Aug 1998;109(4):331-40. [Medline].
  • Ertekin C, Aydogdu I. Neurophysiology of swallowing. Clin Neurophysiol. Dec 2003;114(12):2226-44.
  • Finestone HM, Greene-Finestone LS, Wilson ES, Teasell RW. Malnutrition in stroke patients on the rehabilitation service and at follow-up: prevalence and predictors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Apr 1995;76(4):310-6. [Medline].
  • Fraser C, Power M, Hamdy S, et al. Driving plasticity in human adult motor cortex is associated with improved motor function after brain injury. Neuron. 2002;34:831-40.
  • Freed ML, Freed L, Chatburn RL. Electrical stimulation for swallowing disorders caused by stroke. Respir Care. May 2001;46(5):466-74.
  • Han TR, Paik NJ, Park JW. A functional dysphagia scaleusing videofluoroscopic swallowing study for stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(5):677-82.
  • Holt S, Miron SD, Diaz MC, et al. Scintigraphic measurement of oropharyngeal transit in man. Dig Dis Sci. Oct 1990;35(10):1198-204. [Medline].
  • Leelamanit V, Limsakul C, Geater A. Synchronized electrical stimulation in treating pharyngeal dysphagia. Laryngoscope. Dec 2002;112(12):2204-10.
  • Logemann JA. In: Manual for the Videofluorographic Study of Swallowing. 2nd ed. Austin, TX:. Pro-Ed Inc;1993.
  • Logemann JA. In: Evaluation and Treatment of Swallowing Disorders. 2nd ed. Austin, TX:. Pro-Ed Inc;1998.
  • Mann G, Hankey GJ, Cameron D. Swallowing function after stroke: prognosis and prognostic factors at 6 months. Stroke. Apr 1999;30(4):744-8. [Medline].
  • Mann LL, Wong K. Development of an objective method for assessing viscosity of formulated foods and beverages for the dysphagic diet. J Am Diet Assoc. Jun 1996;96(6):585-8. [Medline].
  • Mistry S, Rothwell JC, Thompson DG. Modulation of human cortical swallowing motor pathways after pleasant and aversive taste stimuli. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. Oct 2006;291(4):G666-71.
  • Noll SF, Bender CE, Marge CN. Rehabilitation of patients with swallowing disorders. In: Braddom RL, ed. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Philadelphia:. WB Saunders Co;1996.
  • Odderson IR, Keaton JC, McKenna BS. Swallow management in patients on an acute stroke pathway: quality is cost effective. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Dec 1995;76(12):1130-3. [Medline].
  • Paik NJ, Han TR, Park JW, et al. Categorization of dysphagia diets with the line spread test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(5):857-61.
  • Paik NJ, Han TR. Critical review on the management for adult oropharyngeal dysphagia. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med. 2002;14:247-72.
  • Palmer JB, Drennan JC, Baba M. Evaluation and treatment of swallowing impairments. Am Fam Physician. Apr 15 2000;61(8):2453-62. [Medline].
  • Park RH, Allison MC, Lang J, et al. Randomised comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and nasogastric tube feeding in patients with persisting neurological dysphagia. BMJ. May 30 1992;304(6839):1406-9. [Medline].
  • Power ML, Hamdy S, Singh S. Deglutitive laryngeal closure in aspirating stroke patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Sep 29 2006.
  • Rosenbek JC, Robbins JA, Roecker EB, et al. A penetration-aspiration scale. Dysphagia. Spring 1996;11(2):93-8. [Medline].
  • Shaker R, Kern M, Bardan E, et al. Augmentation of deglutitive upper esophageal sphincter opening in the elderly by exercise. Am J Physiol. 1997;272(6 Pt 1):G1518-22.
  • Spieker MR. Evaluating dysphagia. Am Fam Physician. Jun 15 2000;61(12):3639-48. [Medline].
  • Splaingard ML, Hutchins B, Sulton LD, Chaudhuri G. Aspiration in rehabilitation patients: videofluoroscopy vs bedside clinical assessment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Aug 1988;69(8):637-40. [Medline].

Dysphagia excerpt

Article Last Updated: Dec 6, 2006