You are in: eMedicine Specialties > Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation > ELECTRODIAGNOSTIC MEDICINE ElectrophysiologyArticle Last Updated: Sep 29, 2006AUTHOR AND EDITOR INFORMATIONSection 1 of 10
  Author: Adam B Agranoff, MD, Physiatrist and Partner, Chelsea Back Care, Chelsea Community Hospital Adam B Agranoff is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Association of Academic Physiatrists, and North American Spine Society Coauthor(s): Jerrold N Rosenberg, MD, Director of Rehabilitation Services, Providence Veterans Hospital; Clinical Assistant Professor, Departments of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University Editors: Elizabeth A Moberg-Wolff, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Medical College of Wisconsin; Consulting Staff, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin; Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine; Michael T Andary, MD, MS, Residency Program Director, Associate Professor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine; Kelly L Allen, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Lourdes Regional Rehabilitation Center, Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center; Denise I Campagnolo, MD, MS, Director of Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Research and Staff Physiatrist, Barrow Neurology Clinics, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center; Investigator for Barrow Neurology Clinics; Director, NARCOMS Project for Consortium of MS Centers, Phoenix Author and Editor Disclosure Synonyms and related keywords: electrophysiology, EP, NDS, EMG, electrodiagnosis, electronic diagnosis, evoked potentials, neurodiagnostics, electromyography, electromyogram, visual EP, VEP, brainstem auditory EP, BSAEP, dermatomal EP, myotomal EP, visual evoked potential, brainstem auditory evoked potential, myotomal evoked potential, dermatomal evoked potential INTRODUCTIONSection 2 of 10
  Electrodiagnosis is the field of study that uses electrical technology to study the neurophysiology of the human body. Several separate tests comprise the field, including neurodiagnostics (NDS), electromyography (EMG), and evoked potentials (EPs). The purpose of this article is to detail these studies, to investigate how they can be of assistance in evaluation of patients, and to help the clinician to interpret their meaning. The scope of this article does not include teaching the reader how to perform electrodiagnostic studies. Various specialists perform electrodiagnostic studies. Understanding and performing electrodiagnostic tests is a requirement in the specialty training of physical medicine and rehabilitation residents (physiatry) and is considered an elective in the training of neurology and anesthesia residents. The American Board of Electrodiagnostics was developed to provide additional certification for physicians who perform electrodiagnostic tests, and this certification is considered the criterion standard for specialty training. The American Board of Neurology also has a subspecialty certification for neurologists with specialty training in electrodiagnosis. NEUROPHYSIOLOGYSection 3 of 10
Every practitioner should be well aware of the normal neurophysiologic function of the nervous system. Electrical signals are generated in the brain and pass through the spinal cord and out into the peripheral nervous system. These signals are carried down the nerve to the synaptic cleft where a chemical release of acetylcholine crosses the synaptic cleft to create an electrical discharge in the muscle. This electrical signal causes the muscle to contract. Neurodiagnostic testing bypasses the brain by delivering an electrical charge to the patient. The equipment then is used to measure several aspects of the body's response to that signal to determine whether it is functioning properly. Location and degree of the injury, acuity, prognosis, and, in some cases, specific diagnosis can be determined through electrodiagnostic testing. ELECTROMYOGRAPHYSection 4 of 10
As noted earlier, electromyography (EMG) was the first electrodiagnostic test to be developed. This procedure involves placement of a needle into various muscles to record the muscle activity in various stages of muscle activity, including at rest, with minimal contraction, and with maximal muscle activity. At rest, normal muscle is electrically silent. Damaged muscle tissue may result in spontaneous depolarization of individual muscle fibers. This abnormal activity can be detected during the needle examination portion of the electrodiagnostic examination. Primary nerve injuries that are severe enough to create neurotmesis or axonotmesis lesions, which result in Wallerian degeneration of the nerve, demonstrate fibrillation and positive sharp-wave discharges at rest. Fibrillations and positive sharp waves are pathognomonic for nerve injuries. Primary muscle disorders can also be detected by EMG. With minimal volitional activity, the recruitment patterns of muscle are normal. An individual muscle fiber begins to fire and reach a threshold of 15-20 Hz, at which point the original fiber recruits a second fiber which fires up to 15-20 Hz and so on, until there is full recruitment of the muscle. Determination of recruitment patterns is difficult and requires more modern computerized equipment; however, recruitment patterns provide critical information for determining the degree of injury and prognosis. Furthermore, this information is helpful in identifying individuals who are malingering. A patient may not be fully cooperative in manual muscle testing for weakness. Determination of the recruitment pattern, however, is not dependent upon patient cooperation. One problem with EMG testing is that needles are used and the study may be painful; however, new computerized technology allows the use of recording needles so small that insertion feels more like a pinch than insertion of a needle. Small gauge needles can be used since nothing is injected or aspirated. Seek out electromyographers who have access to current technology and have board certification to assure that patients do not undergo a procedure with more discomfort than is necessary. A current worrisome trend is the performance of EMG testing by nonphysician health care personnel. Performance and interpretation of EMGs requires both technical skill and the ability to integrate the physician's knowledge base of disease pathology and diagnostic acumen. NERVE CONDUCTION STUDIESSection 5 of 10
Nerve conduction studies (NCSs) are an important part of the complete electrodiagnostic exam. In an NCS, an electrical charge is delivered to a peripheral nerve. That charge is carried down the nerve and generates a muscle contraction. A recording electrode is placed on a muscle innervated by that nerve, and information about the impulse can be recorded, including the latency or time to get from stimulus to recording. The distance traveled and the nerve conduction velocity (NCV) can also be computed. These measures are a sensitive indicator of nerve damage and look specifically at the integrity of the myelination of the nerve. The needle examination and nerve conduction studies are both key components of the complete EMG. The amplitude of the muscle contraction can be determined and compared to the initial size of the signal, providing information about the number of neurons that are functioning within the nerve. By stimulating the nerve in various places along its course, the practitioner can isolate a specific site of injury. For example, in a routine carpal tunnel study, conductions of the median nerve above and below the tunnel may be normal, while conduction across the carpal tunnel itself may be impaired. This test isolates the injury to this specific location. Changes in amplitude often signal an axonal injury. A multitude of entrapments and injuries can be identified in this manner. In the upper extremity, some of these disorders include brachial plexopathies, ulnar entrapments at the cubital and Guyon tunnels, median entrapments at the carpal tunnel, and radial injuries at the spiral groove in the humerus. In the lower extremity, the most common entrapments include the sciatic nerve at the piriformis, the peroneal nerve at the fibular head, and the plantar nerve at the tarsal tunnel. Peripheral neuropathies also can be identified and monitored objectively. The type of nerve injury (demyelinating, axonal, or mixed) can aid in narrowing the differential diagnosis. With knowledge of neuroanatomy and measurements from a sample of nerves and muscles from various nerve roots, the clinician can determine where the lesion must be to affect the various combinations of abnormal findings in the extremity. For example, in a medial cord brachial plexus injury, the ulnar and median nerves are involved along their entire length with sparing of C5-C6 muscles and the paraspinal muscles. A C7-C8 root injury also affects the median-innervated and ulnar-innervated muscles, but the paraspinals are also involved. A good electromyographer is really a detective, identifying the clues and then the culprit. A frequent misconception is that electrodiagnostic testing is not useful in an acute injury. Immediately following complete nerve transection, a complete loss of motor unit recruitment is noted distally (neurotmesis). Even with incomplete nerve injuries (neurapraxia and axonotmesis), decreased motor unit action potential recruitment patterns may be seen acutely. Within the first 2-3 days, a decrease in motor amplitudes proximally may be noted. Sensory amplitude reductions are noted toward the end of the first week following injury. Slowing of conduction velocity across the site of injury suggests a demyelinating injury. Membrane instability can be detected by needle examination in 1-4 weeks with proximal muscles showing up the soonest (due to Wallerian degeneration). At 2-6 months, axonal sprouting occurs, which results in increased motor unit action potential amplitude and prolonged duration. In a traumatic nerve injury, or acute neuropathic process, serial EMGs are often performed to assess disease progression or response to treatment and to aid in prognosis. Remember that a direct relationship exists between nerve diameter and conduction velocity. Larger myelinated fibers (Ia) are the ones measured in nerve conduction studies. The smaller fibers (Ib, II, III) are not recorded with standard nerve conduction techniques. Therefore, a small fiber neuropathy may not be detectable by EMG. EVOKED POTENTIALSSection 6 of 10
Evoked potentials are electrical signals generated by the nervous system in response to sensory stimuli. Evoked potential testing is the application of electrodiagnostic testing to the central nervous system (CNS). These tests are useful clinically to (1) demonstrate abnormal sensory function when the neurologic examination results do not reveal abnormalities, (2) reveal clinically unsuspected pathology when demyelinating diseases are suggested, (3) determine the anatomic distribution of a disease process, and (4) monitor a patient's progress or deterioration objectively over time. The following 5 types of evoked potential tests are performed routinely:
Recording electrodes may be either surface electrodes or small subdermal needles placed anywhere along the neuropathway, including the spine and scalp. Somatosensory evoked potentials SSEPs are the most widely used evoked potential test. Stimulation occurs at the extremity with recordings on the scalp near the sensory cortex. This technique may be used to locate the level of the injury at the nerve root, spinal cord, or brain. SSEPs have been helpful in determining the degree and prognosis in CNS insults, such as spinal cord trauma and strokes. SSEPs can also be used to localize root level injuries in cervical and lumbar radiculopathies and demyelinating diseases like multiple sclerosis, and can be used to determine the level of coma and evaluate for brain death. SSEPs are also useful for intraoperative monitoring of patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures. Visual evoked potentials With VEPs, the practitioner uses a photoelectric checkerboard pattern flash to stimulate the optic nerve. This pattern is then recorded on the cortex, arriving at the occiput, near the visual centers. This usually takes 100 milliseconds to arrive and is referred to as the P100. Injuries along the optic nerve, including demyelination, result in a delay of the latency and loss of the amplitude of the signal, similar to the results in NCVs. A P100 at greater than 102 milliseconds is considered beyond the reference range in most laboratories. In cases of multiple sclerosis, for example, abnormalities in the VEP are often the first indicator of the disease process. Optic chiasm tumors also produce recordings suggesting abnormalities. Visual acuity may be determined in infants with suspected visual disturbances. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials With BSAEPs, the clinician uses an auditory click to stimulate the cochlear nerve. The response is than recorded over the cortex. Because of the multiple signal generators in the brainstem, injuries along this nerve can suggest localization of the lesion to various sites along the nerve route. Five basic waveforms are recorded, and their interwave times may indicate pathology at that anatomical location. These waveforms include the cochlear nerve, the cochlear nucleus, the superior olivary complex, and the mid and upper pons. BSAEPs may be used to help evaluate for brain death, demyelinating disease, and midbrain tumors. Dermatomal and myotomal evoked potentials Dermatomal and myotomal evoked potentials are much more technically difficult to perform and should not be considered routine procedures. Stimulation occurs along the dermatome or myotome with recordings at the cortex. These tests have demonstrated greater specificity than SSEPs and are used frequently in clinical research. Because EPs are conducted along the spinal cord, their use has been expanded to the operating room, where they provide valuable information for the spinal surgeon. In scoliosis surgery, for example, a 0.5% incidence of spinal cord injury has been recorded nationally during the surgery. Spinal cord injury requires that the patient be reanesthetized and the spinal hardware removed. Unfortunately, the damage usually is permanent. With intraoperative use of SSEPs, this risk can be reduced 100-fold. While the patient is asleep and the surgery is progressing, the electromyographer performs repeated SSEP studies. If something happens that interrupts the signal, the electromyographer can inform the surgeon immediately and, ideally, the problem can be corrected before permanent injury occurs. INDICATIONSSection 7 of 10
With appreciation of this technology, the clinician easily can see how electrodiagnostics can assist in the care of patients. Information needed to answer any questions regarding nerve injury, muscle injury, muscle disease, localization, and prognosis can be obtained through electrodiagnostic testing. This information should help focus treatment upon the exact site of injury. Interestingly, the information provided by electrodiagnosis is functional and not static. This information tells the practitioner how the nerve and muscle are functioning. In contrast, MRI is a static test that simply provides a picture of anatomy. A relatively benign appearing MRI can be obtained from a patient with significant pain. Conversely, many people are asymptomatic but disk protrusions or herniations are present on MRI. Therefore, electrodiagnostic testing can be an important adjunct to aid in diagnosis. COSTSection 8 of 10
No discussion of electrodiagnosis would be complete without the consideration of cost. Like in most technological procedures, the cost of the equipment and the necessity for specialty training elevate the cost of performing electrodiagnostic testing. Ten years ago, routine studies cost $700-1000. Like most other procedures, electrodiagnostic studies have been reduced in cost allowable by health care reform. Medicare allowable rates now limit payments generally to $200-300 depending upon the extensiveness of the study. The real question, however, is whether the information gathered changes the way the patient is treated. Does the test make the treatment more effective? In many practices, there is no question that it does. By localizing the lesion and determining the degree of injury, the clinician can identify the etiology objectively and focus efforts on the actual anatomical problem. CONCLUSIONSection 9 of 10
Electrodiagnosis has developed into a sophisticated multidimensional testing procedure. Unfortunately, the results depend upon the skill of the examiner who performs the study and the precision of the equipment used. Not all EMGs are created equal. Whenever possible, the referring physician should opt for a physician boarded by the American Board of Electrodiagnostic Medicine. REFERENCESSection 10 of 10
Article Last Updated: Sep 29, 2006 |
