Excerpt from Spinal Cord Injury: Definition, Epidemiology, PathophysiologySynonyms, Key Words, and Related Terms: Brown-Séquard syndrome, central cord syndrome, anterior cord syndrome, conus medullaris syndrome, cauda equina syndrome Please click here to view the full topic text: Spinal Cord Injury: Definition, Epidemiology, PathophysiologySpinal cord injury (SCI) is an insult to the spinal cord resulting in a change, either temporary or permanent, in its normal motor, sensory, or autonomic function. The International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury is a widely accepted system describing the level and the extent of injury based on a systematic motor and sensory examination of neurologic function. The following terminology has developed around classification of SCI:
SCI can be sustained through different mechanisms with the following 3 common abnormalities leading to tissue damage:
Edema could ensue subsequent to any of these types of damage. The different clinical presentations of the above causes of tissue damage are explained further below. Spinal shock Spinal shock is a state of transient physiological (rather than anatomical) reflex depression of cord function below the level of injury with associated loss of all sensorimotor functions. An initial increase in blood pressure is noted due to the release of catecholamines, followed by hypotension. Flaccid paralysis, including of the bowel and bladder, is observed, and sometimes sustained priapism develops. These symptoms tend to last several hours to days until the reflex arcs below the level of the injury begin to function again (eg, bulbocavernosus reflex, muscle stretch reflex [MSR]). Neurogenic shock Neurogenic shock is manifested by the triad of hypotension, bradycardia, and hypothermia. Shock tends to occur more commonly in injuries above T6, secondary to the disruption of the sympathetic outflow from T1-L2 and to unopposed vagal tone, leading to decrease in vascular resistance with associated vascular dilatation. Neurogenic shock needs to be differentiated from spinal and hypovolemic shock. Hypovolemic shock tends to be associated with tachycardia. Autonomic dysreflexia See the article Autonomic Dysreflexia. In a recent study showing high incidence of autonomic dysfunction, including orthostatic hypotension and impaired cardiovascular control, assessment of autonomic function was recommended as a routine along with American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) assessment. Motor strengths and sensory testing The extent of injury is defined by the ASIA Impairment Scale (modified from the Frankel classification), using the following categories:
Perform rectal examination to check motor function or sensation at the anal mucocutaneous junction. The presence of either is considered sacral-sparing. Definitions of complete and incomplete SCI are based on the above ASIA definition with sacral-sparing.
Sacral-sparing is evidence of the physiologic continuity of spinal cord long tract fibers with the sacral fibers located more at the periphery of the cord. Indication of the presence of sacral fibers is of significance in defining the completeness of the injury and the potential for some motor recovery. This finding tends to be repeated and better defined after the period of spinal shock. With the ASIA classification system, the terms paraparesis and quadriparesis now have become obsolete. The ASIA classification using the description of the neurologic level of injury is used in defining the type of SCI (eg, C8 ASIA A with zone of partial preservation of pinprick to T2). See the entire ASIA Impairment Scale (requires Acrobat reader). Other classifications of SCI include the following:
Muscle strengths are graded using the following Medical Research Council (MRC) scale of 0-5:
Muscle strength always should be graded according to maximum strength attained, no matter how briefly that strength is maintained during the examination. The muscles are tested with the patient supine. The following key muscles are tested in patients with SCI, and the corresponding level of injury is indicated:
Sensory testing is performed at the following levels:
Sensory scoring is for light touch and pinprick, as follows:
A score of zero is given if the patient cannot differentiate between the point of a sharp pin and the dull edge. Motor level - Determined by the most caudal key muscles that have muscle strength of 3 or above while the segment above is normal (= 5) Motor index scoring - Using the 0-5 scoring of each key muscle with total points being 25/extremity and a total possible score of 100 Sensory level - Most caudal dermatome with a normal score of 2/2 for both pinprick and light touch Sensory index scoring - Total score from adding each dermatomal score with possible total score (= 112 each for pinprick and light touch) Neurologic level of injury - Most caudal level at which both motor and sensory levels are intact, with motor level as defined above and sensory level defined by a sensory score of 2 Zone of partial preservation - This index is used only when the injury is complete. All segments below the neurologic level of injury with preservation of motor or sensory findings Skeletal level of injury - Level of greatest vertebral damage on radiograph Lower extremities motor score (LEMS) - Uses the ASIA key muscles in both lower extremities with a total possible score of 50 (ie, maximum score of 5 for each key muscle L2, L3, L4, L5, and S1 per extremity). A LEMS score of 20 or less indicates patients are likely to be limited ambulators. A LEMS of 30 or more suggests that patients are likely to be community ambulators. Please click here to view the full topic text: Spinal Cord Injury: Definition, Epidemiology, Pathophysiology |
| About Us | Privacy | Code of Ethics | Terms of Use | Contact Us | Advertising | Institutional Subscribers |
|
|
|||
|
| Medicine is a constantly changing science and not all therapies are clearly established. New research changes drug and treatment therapies daily. The authors, editors, and publisher of this journal have used their best efforts to provide information that is up-to-date and accurate and is generally accepted within medical standards at the time of publication. However, as medical science is constantly changing and human error is always possible, the authors, editors, and publisher or any other party involved with the publication of this article do not warrant the information in this article is accurate or complete, nor are they responsible for omissions or errors in the article or for the results of using this information. The reader should confirm the information in this article from other sources prior to use. In particular, all drug doses, indications, and contraindications should be confirmed in the package insert. FULL DISCLAIMER |