Continually Updated Clinical Reference
 
 
  All Sources     eMedicine     Medscape     Drug Reference     MEDLINE
 
eMedicine - Liposuction, Trunk : Article by

Quick Find
Authors & Editors
Introduction
Indications
RELEVANT ANATOMY
Contraindications
Workup
Treatment
Complications
Outcome And Prognosis
Future And Controversies
Multimedia
References




Patient Education
Click here for patient education.



Author: Julian B Gordon, MD, Consulting Staff, Division of Plastic Surgery, Kennestone Hospital; Consulting Staff, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Northside Hospital-Cherokee

Julian B Gordon is a member of the following medical societies: American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Sigma Xi

Coauthor(s): Martha Matthews, MD, Head, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Cooper Hospital University Medical Center; Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey

Editors: Gregory Caputy, MD, PhD, Chief, Department of Plastic Surgery, Aesthetica Plastic and Laser Surgery Center of Honolulu; Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine; Alan Matarasso, MD, FACS, PC, Clinical Professor of Plastic Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine; Immed Past President of New York Regional Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery; Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD, Practice Director, Colorado Plastic Surgery Center at Swedish Medical Center; Al Aly, MD, FACS, Consulting Surgeon, Iowa City Plastic Surgery

Author and Editor Disclosure

Synonyms and related keywords: liposuction, trunk liposuction, upper body suction-assisted lipoplasty, upper body contouring, body contouring

History of the Procedure

Accounts of human interest in body weight and contour can be found throughout history. Some of the simplest attempts to change body shape and appearance can be observed in the vast array of clothing used to hide, compress, and mold the human figure. Surgical procedures were devised to alter actual body shape permanently. In 1921, Dujarrier used an obstetric uterine curette to remove fat from the knees of a ballerina. The patient sustained irreparable injury and was left with the horrendous result of an eventual amputation.

In 1978, Kesselring and Meyer reported the use of a suction-assisted curettage method in which sharp curettage and strong suction were employed to remove fat. In the early 1980s, surgeons such as Illouz and Fournier began using suction cannulae without sharp curettage to remove subcutaneous fat. Illouz, in the early part of 1980, also introduced the concept of "wet" liposuction. This technique incorporates an injection of saline into the subcutaneous space before performing liposuction. He found this reduced blood loss and assisted in obtaining smoother, more satisfying results. This technique currently is used most often in liposuction procedures.

Problem

Fat is deposited in the subcutaneous layer in almost all areas of the body. Fat is a normal component of the subcutaneous tissue layer. Fat cells may not be distributed evenly, causing some areas to be more prominent than is ideal. Liposuction is a surgical procedure that attempts to contour specific areas of fat accumulation that patients see as undesirable.

Frequency

According to the American Society of Plastic Surgery (ASPS) National Clearinghouse of Plastic Surgery Statistics, 230,865 liposuction procedures were performed in 1999. This is a 34% increase since 1998 and a 389% increase since 1992. Liposuction is the most commonly performed cosmetic procedure in the United States. The ASPS statistics represent only those procedures performed by ASPS member plastic surgeons certified by the American Board of Plastic Surgery or the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Since many other medical specialists (eg, dermatologists) perform liposuction, these numbers probably are significantly higher.

Pathophysiology

Patterns of fat distribution differ among races, ages, and sexes. The actual number of fat cells remains stable during adult life. The cells get larger with weight gain and smaller with weight loss. In general, women have a proportionately higher percentage of body fat than men. Women typically have a disproportionate number of fat cells in their hips, upper thighs, and buttock, while men tend to have a more even distribution of fat cells in the trunk. Also, liposuction is effective in changing contour because it permanently removes fat cells that are distributed unevenly. The remaining fat cells still can store fat. Therefore, liposuction cannot prevent further weight gain but rather affects weight distribution.

A progressive accumulation of fat occurs intra-abdominally as one ages. This intra-abdominal fat is not treated by liposuction, thus must be differentiated carefully from subcutaneous fat when evaluating a patient for surgery.



The ideal liposuction patient is healthy, eats a well-balanced diet, has good skin elasticity, desires treatment of minimal-to-moderate localized fat deposits, and is within 20-30% of ideal body weight. Modern liposuction techniques allow treatment of a much broader range of patients. New "super volume" liposuctions allow for treatment of patients with more generalized lipodystrophy. In addition, ultrasound-assisted liposuction has afforded good results in patients with fatty deposits that were poorly responsive to traditional liposuction.

Although beyond the scope of this chapter, excisional surgery (eg, abdominoplasty or tummy tuck) has specific indications to treat problems such as severe skin laxity and truncal obesity in patients with poor skin elasticity. Often the two procedures, excisional surgery and liposuction, are combined for an optimal result in certain patients.



Two main layers of subcutaneous fat, deep and superficial, are present. Liposuction primarily is focused on the deeper layer of fat since suctioning is safer and easier there. Suctioning in the superficial layer allows the surgeon to achieve subtle benefits in the procedure but because of its superficial location, increases risks of contour irregularities and injury to the skin. Others claim that superficial liposuction enhances skin retraction.



Liposuction carries greater risk for patients with significant medical problems. Heart disease, lung disease, diabetes, and peripheral vascular disease pose serous risk during any surgical procedure. Smoking or a recent history of smoking is a strong risk factor. Patients who have undergone previous surgery in the area to be contoured are at risk of surgical complications during liposuction. Surgery alters the local anatomy and distorts the normal subcutaneous planes in which liposuction is performed, increasing the chances of injury to local tissues.



Lab Studies

  • A CBC is especially important when performing "mega" liposuctions in which a large blood volume may be lost. Others recommend clotting studies, electrolytes, urinalysis, and radiographs.

Imaging Studies

  • Obtain a chest radiograph as indicated by patient age and medical history.

Other Tests

  • During the history and physical examination, pay specific attention to the possibility of hernias, scars, and masses.
  • Perform relevant preoperative studies (eg, ECG) as indicated by patient age and medical history.
  • Obtain a set of standard photographs. These serve as an intraoperative surgical guide and enable comparison of preoperative and postoperative results.



Surgical therapy

Liposuction offers 4 techniques: dry, wet, superwet, and tumescent.

Dry

  • No fluid is injected into the subcutaneous fat layer before suctioning.
  • Approximately 25-45% of the aspirated volume is blood.
  • This technique is not used commonly except for small volume suctions.

Wet

  • Illouz pioneered this technique in the early 1980s.
  • It consists of an infusion of 100-300 cm3 of saline into each site of fat to be removed before suctioning.
  • The aspirated blood volume is lowered to 20-25% of the total aspirate.
  • Hettler's addition of 1:200,000 or 1:400,000 epinephrine to the presuctioning fluid in 1983 reduced blood loss even more. Less than 15% of the aspirate was blood.

Superwet

  • This technique was devised in the late 1980s.
  • It consists of an infusion of fluid containing epinephrine and low doses of local anesthetic in a 1:1 ratio to the volume of expected aspirate.
  • Blood loss was reduced to approximately 2% of the aspirated volume.

Tumescent

  • Klein described this technique in 1990.
  • Large volumes of saline containing 1:100,000 epinephrine and 0.05% lidocaine were injected subcutaneously before suctioning until the tissues were tense.
  • The injected fluid volume was greater than that expected to be suctioned.
  • Blood loss is approximately 1% of the aspirated volume.

Much debate exists between proponents of the superwet and tumescent techniques. Most modern liposuction is a combination of these two techniques.

Intraoperative details

Standard liposuction

  • Make small stab incisions along relaxed skin tension lines.
  • Inject the presuctioning fluid.
  • Introduce the suction cannulae into the deep fat layer.
  • Activate the vacuum and push the cannula to and fro through the fat, creating a radial pattern.
  • Use multiple incision sites to overlap the fan patterns. This technique helps prevent contour irregularities.
  • If needed, use smaller caliber cannulae to suction the superficial fat layer in a similar fashion. Take care not to injure the skin or to create contour irregularities caused by the superficial location of this fat.
  • Close access wounds with 1-2 buried absorbable sutures. Place sterile dressings.
  • Place a fitted compression garment over the treated areas; some believe that it must be worn continuously for at least 2 weeks.

Ultrasound-assisted liposuction

  • Infuse similar presuctioning fluids into the subcutaneous fat layers.
  • Add ultrasonic energy to emulsify the fat cells.
  • Ultrasound can be performed before suctioning using solid probes or it can be added directly to the suction cannula, enabling simultaneous liquefaction and suctioning of fat. A 3-step procedure is incorporated.
  • Ultrasonic energy is exothermic, thus can cause heat injury to surrounding tissues. This may improve the results of liposuction by increasing contraction of skin and subcutaneous tissues, but it increases the risk of injury to the skin during superficial suctioning.
  • Ultrasound-assisted liposuction allows treatment of areas (ie, back, upper flank, chest, male breast) that previously did not respond well to conventional liposuction.
  • The cosmetic treatment of the male patient with gynecomastia has been revolutionized by the use of UAL. Excellent results have been realized with minimal scarring, avoiding the previously required scars of mastectomies.

Note: The ultrasonic energy used in UAL is delivered via the cannulae as they are passed through the fat layers. Devices do exist that deliver ultrasonic waves transcutaneously but these have not been shown to be helpful.

Postoperative details

  • Compression garments generally are worn over the treated area continuously for at least 2 weeks.
  • Place absorptive dressings over the incision sites and replace them as needed during the first 2 weeks.
  • Liquefied fat, injection fluid, and small amounts of blood leak from the incision sites for about 24 hours.
  • Patients can return to physical activities within a few days as their comfort allows.

Follow-up

Patients usually are seen at frequent intervals during the expected postop period (ie, first 1-2 weeks postoperatively). Although the final results are not appreciated fully for 6 months to 1 year after the procedure, most of the change can be observed after a few months.



Short-term complications

  • Hypesthesia, paresthesias, edema, ecchymosis, hematoma, seroma, and infection usually resolve quickly and are not complicated. Hematomas and seromas may need to be evacuated with large needles or skin incisions. Infections often resolve with oral antibiotics although a low incidence of devastating necrotizing fasciitis has been reported.
  • Fat emboli can be fatal but are rare.
  • Skin necrosis can occur, usually as small areas. It usually can be treated conservatively with local wound care.

Long-term complications

  • The most common long-term complication is contour irregularities. This is related to the surgeon's experience and may respond to massage therapy. Treat it conservatively for at least 6 months. Perform autologous fat grafting, further liposuction, or skin excision as needed. Various studies state minor revision rates of 2-10%.
  • Skin color changes are rare but are more common with aggressive superficial ultrasound-assisted liposuction.

Specific incidences for the complications of liposuction are difficult to ascertain. Doctors of various specialties perform liposuction in hospitals, surgical centers, and private offices. The most devastating complication of liposuction, death, has been reviewed statistically.

In January 2000, Grazer published an article in which he reported the fatal outcomes of liposuction using a census survey of cosmetic surgeons. He surveyed 1200 actively practicing North American aesthetic plastic surgeons. Of those, 917 reported that from 1994-1997, after 496,245 lipoplasties, 95 fatalities occurred. This yields a mortality rate of 1/5224, or a little less than 0.5%. This is similar to rates quoted elsewhere. Pulmonary thromboembolism was the major cause of death in 23.4±2.6% of these deaths.



Liposuction is an extremely effective surgical tool that affords excellent results. Patients still can gain weight after undergoing liposuction but their shape remains more balanced than before the procedure. In most published studies on liposuction, approximately 10% of patients require a minor touch up within a few months of surgery. In appropriately selected patients, liposuction performed by skilled surgeons yields patient satisfaction rates greater than 90%.



Controversies exist regarding simultaneous use of liposuction with other procedures for body contouring. Some surgeons routinely perform liposuction while performing procedures such as abdominoplasty. Performing multiple procedures simultaneously carries a greater risk of complications. Abdominoplasties compromise blood flow to skin and fat in the treated and surrounding areas. Simultaneously adding the surgical trauma of liposuction to this therapy increases the chance of significant blood flow compromise to the tissues in the surgical zone. As more of these combined procedures take place and larger volumes of liposuction are performed, the limits of this surgical therapy will be defined more clearly.



Media file 1:  Liposuction, trunk. Posterior view of patient before tumescent suctioning. Note the excess fat on the hips, inner thighs, and outer thighs.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 2:  Liposuction, trunk. Frontal view of patient before tumescent suctioning. Note the excess fat on the hips, inner thighs, and outer thighs.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 3:  Liposuction, trunk. Posterior view 3 months after 3 L of tumescent liposuction without ultrasound assistance. A reduction in the total fat on the hips and thighs is readily seen. A smooth "hourglass" contour has been obtained.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 4:  Liposuction, trunk. Frontal view 3 months after 3 L of tumescent liposuction without ultrasound assistance. A reduction in the total fat on the hips and thighs is readily seen. A smooth "hourglass" contour has been obtained.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo



  • Fournier PF, Otteni FM. Lipodissection in body sculpturing: the dry procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 1983;72(5):598-609. [Medline].
  • Gilliland MD, Coates N. Tumescent liposuction complicated by pulmonary edema. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jan 1997;99(1):215-9. [Medline].
  • Grazer FM, de Jong RH. Fatal outcomes from liposuction: census survey of cosmetic surgeons. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2000;105(1):447-448. [Medline].
  • Illouz YG. Body contouring by lipolysis: a 5-year experience with over 3000 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 1983;72(5):591-7. [Medline].
  • Illouz YG. Illouz''s technique of body contouring by lipolysis. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 1984;11(3):409-17. [Medline].
  • Kesselring UK, Meyer R. A suction curette for removal of excessive local deposits of subcutaneous fat. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 1978;62(2):305-6. [Medline].
  • Klein JA. The tumescent technique. Anesthesia and modified liposuction technique. Dermatol Clin. Jul 1990;8(3):425-37. [Medline].
  • Matarasso A. Superficial suction lipectomy: something old, something new, something borrowed.... Ann Plast Surg. Mar 1995;34(3):268-72; discussion 272-3. [Medline].
  • Pitanguy I. Evaluation of body contouring surgery today: a 30-year perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg. Apr 2000;105(4):1499-514; discussion 1515-6. [Medline].
  • Pitman GH, Aker JS, Tripp ZD. Tumescent liposuction. A surgeon''s perspective. Clin Plast Surg. Oct 1996;23(4):633-41; discussion 642-5. [Medline].
  • Pitman GH, Teimourian B. Suction lipectomy: complications and results by survey. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jul 1985;76(1):65-72. [Medline].
  • Teimourian B, Adham MN. A national survey of complications associated with suction lipectomy: what we did then and what we do now. Plast Reconstr Surg. Apr 2000;105(5):1881-4. [Medline].

Liposuction, Trunk excerpt

Article Last Updated: Jun 5, 2006