Continually Updated Clinical Reference
 
 
  All Sources     eMedicine     Medscape     Drug Reference     MEDLINE
 
eMedicine - Pressure Ulcers, Surgical Treatment and Principles : Article by

Quick Find
Authors & Editors
Introduction
Indications
Relevant Anatomy
Contraindications
Workup
Treatment
Complications
Outcome and Prognosis
Future and Controversies
Multimedia
References




Patient Education
Click here for patient education.



Author: Bradon J Wilhelmi, MD, Endowed Leonard Weiner, MD, Professor and Chief of Division of Plastic Surgery, Residency Program Director, University of Louisville School of Medicine

Bradon J Wilhelmi is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Association for Hand Surgery, American Association of Clinical Anatomists, American Association of Plastic Surgeons, American Burn Association, American College of Surgeons, American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, American Society for Surgery of the Hand, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Association for Surgical Education, Plastic Surgery Research Council, and Wound Healing Society

Coauthor(s): Michael Neumeister, MD, FRCSC, FACS, Program Director, Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine

Editors: Albert E Cram, MD, FACS, Professor Emeritus, Departments of Surgery, Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery and Orthopedic Surgery, University of Iowa College of Medicine; Consulting Staff, Iowa City Plastic Surgery; Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine; Wayne Stadelmann, MD, Stadelmann Plastic Surgery, PC; Nicolas (Nick) G Slenkovich, MD, Practice Director, Colorado Plastic Surgery Center at Swedish Medical Center; Lars M Vistnes, MD, FRCSC, FACS, Professor of Surgery, Emeritus, Stanford University Medical Center

Author and Editor Disclosure

Synonyms and related keywords: pressure ulcer, decubitus ulcer, bed sore, pressure sore, nonhealing wound, non-healing wound, wound healing complication, wound-healing complication, pressure ischemia, paraplegia, quadriplegia, spina bifida, immobilization, multiple sclerosis, MS, Marjolin ulcers, pressure sore reconstruction, flap procedures, chronic wound, pressure sore carcinoma

Found during autopsies on Egyptian mummies, pressure sores are an ancient medical problem. The terms decubitus ulcer and pressure sore have been interchanged inappropriately over the years. Technically, the term decubitus ulcer refers to wounds developed over bony prominences while in the recumbent position (ie, sacrum, heel, occiput); the Latin decumbere means "to lie down." Therefore, semantically, wounds acquired from extended pressure in the seated or turned position (ie, ischial or trochanteric ulcers) are not decubitus ulcers. Therefore, in general, wounds acquired from pressure over bony prominences can always be called pressure sores.

History of the Procedure

In 1938, Davis was the first to suggest replacing the unstable scar of a healed pressure sore with a flap of tissue.1 In 1947, Kostrubala and Greeley recommended excising the bony prominence and adding padding for the exposed bone with local fascia or muscle-fascia flaps.2

Problem

Overall, patients with pressure sores are important users of medical resources. They require 50% more nursing time, remain hospitalized for significantly longer periods, and incur higher hospital charges.

Frequency

Pressure sores are common conditions among patients hospitalized in acute- and chronic-care facilities. Studies have suggested that, at any given time, 3-10% of hospitalized persons have pressure sores and 2.7% develop new pressure sores. Among a selected population, the incidence rate for the development of a new pressure sore has been demonstrated to be much higher, with a range of 7.7-26.9%.

Two thirds of pressure sores that develop in hospitalized patients occur in patients older than 70 years.3 As elderly individuals become the fastest-growing segment of the population, with an estimated 1.5 million people living in extended-care facilities, the problem of pressure sores will have an even more profound influence on the American economy. Most studies found the prevalence rate of pressure sores in patients in nursing homes to be 3-6%. However, other studies reported prevalence rates as high as 25-33%.

Pressure sores also occur with a higher frequency in young patients who are neurologically impaired. Immobility and lack of sensation make these patients susceptible to developing pressure sores. The incidence rate of pressure sores in these patients has been demonstrated to be approximately 5-8% annually, and 25-85% of these patients develop a pressure sore at some time. Once again, the treatment of pressure sores in this patient population represents a financial challenge, with an average cost per admission of a patient with a pressure sore of $78,000 at one hospital.

Etiology

Several theories exist on the etiology of pressure sores, mostly based on ischemia and hypoxia resulting in decreased oxygen delivery to the tissues. In 1879, Charcot suggested that injury to CNS trophic centers decreases tissue tolerance to local pressure and leads to skin necrosis. However, Brown Sequard demonstrated that pressure ulcers can heal equally well in paralyzed and nonparalyzed animals.

The pressure ischemia theory maintains that pressure sores result from constant pressure sufficient to impair local blood flow to soft tissue for an extended period. This external pressure must be greater than arterial capillary pressure of 32 mm Hg to impair inflow and greater than venous capillary closing pressure of 8-12 mm Hg to impede the return of flow for an extended time. Constant external pressure for 2 hours or more produces irreversible changes in tissues in animal model studies. One study demonstrated no histologic changes with pressure release at 5-minute intervals.

Lindan et al documented ranges of pressure applied to various anatomic points in certain positions.4 The points of greatest pressure with the patient supine included the sacrum, heel, and occiput, at 40-60 mm Hg. With the body in prone position, the chest and knees absorbed the greatest pressure, at 50 mm Hg. When the patient is sitting, the ischial tuberosities are under the most pressure, at 100 mm Hg. Obviously, these pressures are greater than end capillary pressure, indicating why these are the most common areas to develop pressure sores.

Furthermore, studies have demonstrated the pathologic changes caused by pressure to be more severe in muscle than in skin and subcutaneous layers. These histologic studies revealed that early signs of damage occur in the upper dermis, with dilation of capillaries and venules and swelling and separation of endothelial cells. Then, perivascular infiltrates, platelet aggregates, and perivascular hemorrhage develop in the dermis. Additionally, subcutaneous fat demonstrates signs of necrosis along with early vascular changes. Interestingly, the epidermis shows no signs of necrosis until late because epidermal cells are able to withstand a prolonged absence of oxygen both in vivo and in vitro.

Others have postulated that pressure ulcers result from metabolic deficits. Muscle has the highest nutritional demands, which helps explain this deeper tissue involvement preferential to skin.

Clinical

Patient history

In obtaining a history from the patient with a pressure sore, determine the associated medical cause for the ulcer (eg, paraplegia, quadriplegia, spina bifida, immobilization in hospital, multiple sclerosis). Other factors that should be elicited in the patient's history include onset, duration, other ulcers, prior medical treatment, wound care, and prior surgical treatment. (Click here to complete a Medscape CME activity on comorbidities and quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis.)

The patient's social situation also can impact treatment. Determine if the patient has a pressure-reducing mattress for the wheelchair and bed and an appropriate support system at home to minimize the risk of recurrence. Also, obtain a complete review of systems, including the presence of fevers, night sweats, rigors, weight loss, weakness, and loss of appetite. Click here to complete a Medscape CE activity on the care of patients with pressure sores.

Physical examination

In addition to the patient history, perform a physical examination. Describe the specific location of the pressure sore based on the underlying bony prominence (eg, sacral, ischial, trochanteric). Infection of the pressure sore is suggested by wound edge erythema, foul odor, purulent discharge, and necrotic bone. Determine the level of tissue injury (ie, to epidermis, dermis, subcutaneous fat, muscle, bone, joint). Several classification systems of pressure sores are available based on this level of injury. One widely accepted classification system has 4 stages. Pressure sore staging from Barczak et al5 is as follows:

  • Stage 1 - Skin intact but reddened for greater than 1 hour after relief of pressure
  • Stage 2 - Blister or other break in dermis with or without infection
  • Stage 3 - Subcutaneous destruction into muscle with or without infection
  • Stage 4 - Involvement of bone or joint with or without infection

Also, note the character of the wound base and if it has granulation tissue or necrotic tissue. Verrucous heaps of white tissue within or around the wound suggest malignant transformation, as is observed with Marjolin ulcers (see Images 1-2). Document the size of the wound, wound edge undermining, additional pockets, and sinus tract communication with the hip joint or urethra. Note existing scars and the presence of colostomy and cystostomy. Also assess the extent of associated spasm.



Despite the susceptibility of muscle to early injury with pressure over bony prominences (see Relevant Anatomy), classification schematics recognize muscle involvement as a later stage in the process of wounding. The classification scheme is most useful in determining treatment.

The decision to reconstruct a pressure ulcer is complex and based on several considerations. Stage 1 and 2 pressure sores are treated conservatively. In general, stage 3 and 4 pressure sores may require flap reconstruction, although some patients with stage 3 and 4 pressure sores must be treated conservatively because of coexisting medical problems.

Wound reconstruction can be considered once the bacterial load has been minimized to fewer than 100,000 organisms to reduce the risk of infectious complications. Furthermore, the patient's social situation and nutritional status must be optimized (albumin level >3.5 g/mL) to reduce risk of an adverse outcome.



Pressure ulcers are described by location and the depth of involvement. Pressure sores can be found over the occiput, scapula, ischium, sacrum, trochanter, heels, and posterior iliac spine. These wounds can involve different levels of tissue. Muscle has been proven to be most susceptible to pressure. However, Daniel and Faibisoff found muscle to rarely interpose bone and skin in normal weightbearing positions in cadaver and clinical dissections.6



Because the complication rate of pressure sore reconstruction can be extremely high, poor candidates for operations in general should not undergo pressure reconstruction. Patients without the proper support network and pressure-release bed at home are not good candidates for pressure sore reconstruction because of the risk for recurrence or other complications. Patients who are noncompliant with nonoperative measures used to promote healing by secondary intention are also poor candidates for reconstruction.

Wound infections and osteomyelitis must first be aggressively debrided. Patients with significant fecal soiling into the pressure sore should be considered for diverting colostomy prior to reconstruction. Also, pressure sores with urethral fistulas should be diverted and healed prior to reconstruction.



Lab Studies

  • Osteomyelitis is suggested by an erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) greater than 120 mm/h and a WBC count greater than 15,000/µL.
  • Preoperative nutritional status can be determined by obtaining the patient's albumin level, which should be optimized to at least 3.5 g/mL prior to flap reconstruction. These patients often have anemia of chronic disease, suggested by a low mean corpuscular volume, and can be considered for a transfusion in order to achieve a preoperative hemoglobin level greater than 12 g.

Imaging Studies

  • Diagnosis of underlying osteomyelitis can be evaluated first with plain films. Osteomyelitis can also suggested by positive bone scan findings. A negative bone scan finding generally excludes osteomyelitis. However, patients with an open wound such as a pressure sore can often have a falsely positive bone scan. A positive bone scan finding can be evaluated further with an MRI or bone biopsy.

Diagnostic Procedures

  • Bone biopsy is the criterion standard for the diagnosis of osteomyelitis within a pressure sore. Bone biopsy should be considered in patients with elevated ESR, elevated WBC, and or abnormal pelvic films suggestive of osteomyelitis.



Medical Therapy

Conservative treatment of pressure sores includes appropriate wound care, debridement of necrotic tissue, optimization of nutrition, release of pressure, and minimization of muscle spasticity to provide the patient with the best opportunity to heal by secondary intention. Stage 1 and 2 pressure sores are treated conservatively. Some patients with stage 3 and 4 pressure sores must be treated conservatively because of coexisting medical problems. For more information, please see Pressure Ulcers, Nonsurgical Treatment and Principles.

Infection of pressure ulcer wounds can affect treatment. To optimize wound healing potential, the wound should be in bacteriologic balance. Pressure ulcer infection is suggested by the presence of necrotic tissue, wound edge erythema, purulent discharge, and a foul odor. The most common organisms found in pressure sores include Staphylococcus aureus, Proteus mirabilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacteroides fragilis, and Bacteroides asaccharolyticus. When more than 100,000 organisms are growing on quantitative cultures obtained from the pressure sore wound, debridement and aggressive wound care are required before considering wound reconstruction. Wound infection can be confirmed by quantitative tissue culture with more than 100,000 organisms in culture (clostridial and group B streptococcal infections can occur at lower bacterial counts).

For conservative treatment, remove all necrotic tissue. If necrotic tissue is minimal, moist-to-dry dressings can be used with modified Dakin solution or isotonic sodium chloride solution. More extensive necrosis may require surgical debridement at the bedside or in the operating room. Once the wound is clean, silver sulfadiazine (Silvadene) can be used to reduce the bacterial load, which has been demonstrated to hasten wound healing. Alternatively, a negative pressure dressing can be considered for deep wounds that are clean and in bacteriologic balance. The negative pressure dressing has been found to decrease healing time and bacteria.

If the patient's nutritional status is deficient, as determined based on albumin level and caloric intake (energy intake), supplementation (either orally or enterically [tube feeding]) is required. In the short term, supplementation can be assessed by serum prealbumin level, which has a shorter half-life (2 d) than albumin (17 d) or urine nitrogen. Patients with gut dysfunction may require total parenteral nutrition.

The pressure on the skin must be reduced by turning the patient in bed every 2 hours and by the use of a pressure-reducing mattress. Pressure-reducing mattresses include low–air loss beds, air-fluidized beds, and Roho cushion mattress seats for wheelchairs. Furthermore, sitting patients should shift their body weight every 15 minutes.

Surgical Therapy

In general, stage 3 and 4 pressure sores require flap reconstruction. The choice of flap for reconstruction depends on the location of the ulcer (see Intraoperative details).

Preoperative Details

Involuntary muscle spasms must be controlled preoperatively with baclofen or diazepam. Arrange for a pressure-reducing mattress (air-fluidized bed) for the postoperative period. Treat the patient for a urinary tract infection (UTI) if urinalysis and urinary culture findings (ie, nitrites, leukocyte esterase) confirm its presence. For more information on UTIs, see Urinary Tract Infection, Males; and Urinary Tract Infection, Females.

Once the decision has been made to reconstruct, the wound is debrided. Debridement of a pressure sore that will be reconstructed is different from debridement of a pressure sore that will be treated conservatively (ie, allowed to heal by secondary intention). A radical bursectomy is performed by placing a methylene blue–moistened sponge in the bursa and excising the pressure sore circumferentially, removing all granulation tissue, even from the wound base (see Image 3).

Intraoperative Details

After the bursectomy, primary closure of the pressure sore is almost always under tension and is doomed to fail. Other technical points of pressure reconstruction include radically removing underlying necrotic bone, padding of the bone stump, filling the dead space with muscle, using a large flap, achieving adequate flap mobilization to avoid tension, and avoiding adjacent flap territories to preserve options to reconstruct other locations. The choice of flap for reconstruction depends on the location of the ulcer.

Ischial pressure ulcers

The ischial location is the most common location in individuals with paraplegia. When performing the excisional debridement in preparation for flap repair of ischial wounds, aggressive resection of the ischial tuberosity may risk a contralateral ischial pressure sore from increased contralateral pressure. Bilateral ischiectomy increases pressure on the perineum and increases the risk of perineal pressure sores. Pressure sore recurrence is common in the ischial location. Therefore, the first option for reconstruction of ischial wounds is the gluteal thigh rotation flap, which does not preclude the future use of the inferior portion of the gluteus maximus muscle.

The gluteal thigh rotation flap is an axial flap based on the inferior gluteal artery. Both the biceps femoris and hamstring myocutaneous flaps transect the inferior gluteal artery. With the gluteal thigh flap, a superiorly based flap is elevated, with its axis being the inferior gluteal artery located between the greater trochanter and the ischial tuberosity (see Image 4). The gluteal thigh rotation flap is raised as a fasciocutaneous flap superiorly to the gluteal crease (see Image 5). The gluteal thigh flap may be raised to include the inferior portion of the gluteus maximus muscle, which increases the arc of rotation and also allows this flap to be used to reconstruct sacral defects (see Image 6).

Another popular option for ischial reconstruction, the inferior gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap, limits options for reconstruction of sacral wounds. Bilateral V-Y advancement flaps, inferiorly based random flaps, and superior gluteal myocutaneous flaps are not options for sacral reconstruction if an inferior gluteal myocutaneous flap has been used (see Image 7).

Other described options for ischial reconstruction include the hamstring myocutaneous flap, biceps femoris myocutaneous flap, tensor fascia lata (TFL) flap, gracilis myocutaneous flap, and medially based posterior thigh skin flap with or without biceps femoris.

Sacral pressure ulcers

Sacral ulcers are common in patients who have been on prolonged bed rest. Treatment involves complete ulcer excision, including the entire bursa, and conservative ostectomy. Small sacral ulcers can be reconstructed with an inferiorly based skin rotation flap with or without the superior gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap (see Images 8-10). The use of the random skin rotation flap does not preclude later use of the gluteus muscle. When using a random skin rotation flap, designing a large and wide flap with an axis of rotation that permits tension-free closure is essential.

With the superior gluteal myocutaneous flap, a wide skin rotation flap is elevated with the superior portion of the gluteus maximus muscle. The landmarks for the superior gluteal artery on which the superior gluteus maximus muscle flap is based include the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) and the ischial tuberosity. The superior and inferior gluteal arteries branch from the internal iliac artery superior and inferior to the piriformis muscle approximately 5 cm from the medial edge of the origin of the gluteus maximus muscle from the sacrococcygeal line (from the PSIS to the coccyx; see Image 11).

When using the superior portion of the gluteus maximus muscle as a flap, it is elevated in a lateral-to-medial direction to avoid injury to the superior gluteal artery, which can be difficult to identify from the medial direction because of the inflammation and scar of the sacral pressure sore. The insertion of the superior portion of the gluteus maximus muscle is the iliotibial; this insertion is released. The superior gluteal artery is only 4 cm long, which limits the rotation of the muscle. Thus, harvesting the entire length of the muscle may be necessary to allow for rotation or turnover into the defect without tension (see Images 12-13).

Larger sacral ulcers require the use of bilateral flaps such as bilateral V-Y myocutaneous advancement flaps (see Image 14). V-Y flaps can be based on the superior, inferior, or whole gluteus maximus muscle depending on ulcer location. The V should be fashioned wide enough and long enough to close as a Y without tension. The medial edge of the origin of the gluteus maximus is elevated in a medial-to-lateral direction for approximately 4 cm because the superior and inferior gluteal arteries enter the gluteus muscle 5 cm from its origin.

Release of the gluteal muscle insertion laterally is important for medial advancement and tension-free approximation of the muscles medially. Inflamed fibrous tissue along the medial muscle edge can be preserved and used to hold sutures for midline muscle approximation. Another option for sacral reconstruction is the transverse lumbosacral flap.

Trochanteric pressure ulcers

Trochanteric pressure sores are less common and are typically associated with minimal skin loss. Excisional debridement of trochanteric ulcers in preparation for flap repair involves resection of the entire bursa and greater trochanter of the femur. The TFL flap is the first option for reconstruction of trochanteric pressure sores. The TFL flap is a myocutaneous flap based on the lateral femoral circumflex artery. The TFL muscle is 13 cm long, 3 cm wide, and 2 cm thick, and it originates from the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and the iliac crest and inserts into the iliotibial tract.

The skin paddle is harvested 10 cm in width and designed over the muscle along an axis from the ASIS to the lateral tibial condyle (see Images 15-16). The inferior limit of the cutaneous territory can be extended to 6 cm above the knee and 25-35 cm in length. The lateral femoral circumflex artery can be found approximately 6-8 cm inferior to the ASIS. In patients with lumbar lesions, a sensate TFL flap can be designed to include the T12 dermatome by fashioning the flap to include the area 6 cm posterior to the ASIS.

Other described modifications of the TFL flap include the retroposition V-Y flap and the bipedicled TFL. Other options for trochanteric reconstruction include the vastus lateralis myocutaneous flap, the gluteal thigh flap, and the anterior thigh flap.

Multiple pressure ulcers

Multiple pressure sores can be observed in the same patient. Reconstruction of multiple ulcers may require the use of a total thigh flap. The total thigh flap is a long and formidable operation necessitating the transfusion of 6-20 units of blood. It should be reserved as a salvage procedure when other attempts have been unsuccessful. Patients who have undergone a unilateral total thigh flap can sit a wheelchair (see Image 17).

Postoperative Details

Postoperative care of pressure sore reconstruction is extremely important to reduce the risk of complications. From the time of transfer from the operating table to the air-fluid bed, exercise care to prevent shearing and tension across the flap repair. Patients are positioned flat in the air-fluid bed for 4 weeks. After 4 weeks, the patient can be placed carefully into a semi-sitting position. Six weeks after surgery, sitting is begun initially for 10-minute intervals. After these sitting periods, evaluate the patient's flap for discoloration and wound edge separation. The sitting periods are increased at 10-minute intervals over 2 weeks for up to 2-hour periods. Patients are taught to lift themselves to relieve pressure for 10 seconds every 10 minutes.



Pressure sores are associated with a number of adverse outcomes. Complications include autonomic dysreflexia, osteomyelitis, pyarthroses, sepsis, amyloidosis, anemia, recurrence, urethral fistula, and malignant transformation.

Autonomic dysreflexia is a disordered autonomic response to specific stimuli. Patients with midthoracic spinal cord lesions are most prone to this response, which includes sweating, flushing, nasal congestion, headache, intermittent hypertension, piloerection, and bradytachycardia. The sweating and flushing occur proximal to the level of injury. Patients in whom autonomic dysreflexia is suggested are first positioned with their head up and are monitored for changes in heart rate and blood pressure. Then, the precipitating stimulus must be removed.

The most common precipitating cause is bladder distension, which requires treatment with Foley catheter insertion or irrigation of an existing Foley catheter to remove blockage. Consider a rectal examination to evaluate for fecal impaction. Nifedipine, hydralazine, or topical nitroglycerin (Nitropaste) can be used to stabilize the blood pressure. Finally, spinal anesthesia may be required for autonomic dysreflexia refractory to the above measures.

Foremost in the treatment of osteomyelitis is the removal of all nonviable bone, down to bone that bleeds bright red. When reconstructing pressure sores associated with osteomyelitis, use bone that is in the base flaps and has a muscle component. Place the muscle over this bone after appropriate bone debridement. The flap reconstruction can be performed at the same time as the bone debridement. Then, administer a 6-week course of intravenous antibiotics.

Pyarthrosis of the hip joint can occur with communication of ischial or trochanteric ulcers. Often, the femur head contains osteomyelitis, which mandates its removal. The Girdlestone arthroplasty procedure has been described for this situation (ie, hip pyarthrosis), with removal of the femur head and reconstruction of this space with the vastus lateralis muscle flap (see Image 18).7

Recurrence rates for pressure sores can be high because of patient noncompliance, seromas, hematomas, wound infections, and dehiscence. Intraoperative measures that can minimize recurrence risk include tension-free flap reconstruction, suction catheter drainage, meticulous hemostasis, and aggressive debridement. Postoperatively, patients must use pressure-reducing mattresses and pressure-release techniques to decrease their risk of recurrence. Patients with paraplegia have the highest rate of recurrence (80%).

Pressure sores can also erode into the urethra. Treatment of this complication (ie, urethral fistula) involves urinary diversion. Pressure sore reconstruction can be considered once the fistula has healed (see Images 19-20).

Although Marjolin initially described malignant transformation of a chronic scar from a burn wound, the term Marjolin ulcer has been used interchangeably for malignant transformation of any chronic wound, including pressure sores, osteomyelitis, venous stasis ulcers, urethral fistulas, anal fistulas, and other traumatic wounds. This malignant transformation is, histologically, a well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma; however, its behavior is very aggressive when it arises in pressure sores as compared to in burns or osteomyelitis. Pressure sore carcinoma is a highly lethal disease, with 12 of 18 patients reported in the literature dying within 2 years. Therefore, treatment of a pressure sore carcinoma must be aggressive.

Wide local excision, amputation, and lymph node dissection have been described for Marjolin ulcers arising from burns or osteomyelitis. However, because pressure sore carcinoma is more aggressive, more radical treatment is required (eg, hemicorporectomy and regional node dissection) if a cure is to be effected. In a retrospective analysis at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, in 3.4% of 1200 patients with squamous cell carcinoma, the carcinoma arose from thermal burns of irradiation dermatitis. The actual complication rate for malignant transformation of a pressure sore is not known but can be assumed to be low because only 18 cases are described in the literature.

The most common causes of fatality for patients with chronic pressure sores are renal failure and amyloidosis. In general, mortality rates are higher for patients who develop a new sore and in whom the pressure sore fails to heal.



With the highest complication rate of all procedures performed, pressure sore reconstruction is perhaps the most complex challenge to plastic surgeons. Treatment of patients with pressure sores involves several considerations to minimize the risk of adverse outcomes of the reconstruction. Patients must be meticulously and compulsively prepared preoperatively, with nutritional deficiency, anemia, spasms, and coexisting urinary infection corrected. Patients must have adequate social resources, including pressure-release beds, wheelchair mattresses, and a compliant attitude to prevent recurrence. Intraoperatively, technical points of pressure sore reconstruction must be followed stringently to minimize the risk of complications. The postoperative regimen for the transition from flat bed rest to sitting and from weight-shifting into and out of the wheelchair in the return to daily living must be strict and careful.

Even with close adherence to the above stated guidelines, pressure sore recurrence rates are high. When caring for patients with chronic pressure sores, flap procedures must be planned carefully and social resources must be provided assiduously to reduce the high risk of adverse outcomes in this complication-prone population.



Wound healing factors that promote spontaneous wound closure of pressure ulcers have been identified. Platelets play an important role in the inflammatory phase of wound healing by providing hemostasis and releasing growth factors known to accelerate wound healing. Atri et al reported their success in augmenting spontaneous wound healing with platelet-derived growth factors for 23 subjects in whom initial treatment with Silvadene failed.8 Later, Robson et al and Mustoe and colleagues found recombinant platelet-derived growth factor BB in concentrations of 100 mcg/mL to effect clinical wound healing in a phase II study of stage 3 and 4 pressure ulcers.9, 10

The cost to treat patients with these growth factors is presently significant. However, in the future, these nonoperative measures may be involved in the treatment of pressure ulcers, especially for patients who are not suitable for surgery because of coexisting morbidities.



Media file 1:  Heaps of verrucous white tissue around the ulcer suggest malignant transformation as observed with Marjolin ulcers.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 2:  Pressure ulcers. Close-up view of area with heaps of verrucous white tissue around the ulcer, the presence of which suggests malignant transformation as observed with Marjolin ulcers.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 3:  Pressure ulcers. Radical bursectomy is performed by placing a methylene blue–moistened sponge in the bursa and excising the pressure sore circumferentially, removing all granulation tissue, even from the wound base.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Image

Media file 4:  Pressure ulcers. With the gluteal thigh flap, a superiorly based flap is elevated, with the inferior gluteal artery located between the greater trochanter and the ischial tuberosity as its axis.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Illustration

Media file 5:  Pressure ulcers. The gluteal thigh rotation flap is raised as a fasciocutaneous flap superiorly to the gluteal crease.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Image

Media file 6:  Pressure ulcers. The gluteal thigh flap may be raised to include the inferior portion of the gluteus maximus muscle, which increases the arc of rotation to allow this flap to also be used to reconstruct sacral defects.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Image

Media file 7:  Pressure ulcers. Small sacral pressure sores can be reconstructed with the inferior-based skin rotation flap with or without the superior gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Illustration

Media file 8:  Pressure ulcers. Small sacral pressure sores can be reconstructed with the inferior-based skin rotation flap with or without the superior gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 9:  Pressure ulcers. Small sacral pressure sores can be reconstructed with the inferior-based skin rotation flap with or without the superior gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 10:  Pressure ulcers. The landmarks for the superior gluteal artery, on which the superior gluteus maximus muscle flap is based, include the posterior superior iliac spine and the ischial tuberosity. The superior and inferior gluteal arteries branch from the internal iliac superior and inferior arteries to the piriformis muscle approximately 5 cm from the medial edge of the origin of the gluteus maximus muscle from the sacrococcygeal line.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Illustration

Media file 11:  Pressure ulcers. In using the superior portion of the gluteus maximus muscle as a flap, it is elevated in a lateral-to-medial direction to avoid injury to the superior gluteal artery, which can be difficult to identify from the medial direction because of the inflammation and scarring from the sacral pressure sore. The insertion of the superior portion of gluteus maximus muscle is the iliotibial. This insertion is released. The superior gluteal artery is only 4 cm long, which limits the rotation of the muscle. Thus, harvesting the entire length of the muscle may be necessary to allow for rotation or turnover into the defect without tension.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Illustration

Media file 12:  Pressure ulcers. In using the superior portion of the gluteus maximus muscle as a flap, it is elevated in a lateral-to-medial direction to avoid injury to the superior gluteal artery, which can be difficult to identify from the medial direction because of the inflammation and scarring from the sacral pressure sore. The insertion of the superior portion of gluteus maximus muscle is the iliotibial. This insertion is released. The superior gluteal artery is only 4 cm long, which limits the rotation of the muscle. Thus, harvesting the entire length of the muscle may be necessary to allow for rotation or turnover into the defect without tension.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Illustration

Media file 13:  Pressure ulcers. The V-Y flaps can be based superiorly or inferiorly or on the whole gluteus maximus muscle.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Illustration

Media file 14:  Pressure ulcers. Larger sacral ulcers require the use of bilateral flaps such as bilateral V-Y advancement flaps.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Image

Media file 15:  Pressure ulcers. The skin paddle is harvested 10 cm in width and designed over the muscle along an axis from the anterior superior iliac spine to the lateral tibial condyle.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Image

Media file 16:  Pressure ulcers. The inferior limit of the cutaneous territory can be extended to 6 cm above the knee and 25-35 cm in length. The lateral femoral circumflex artery can be found approximately 6-8 cm inferior to the anterior superior iliac spine.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Illustration

Media file 17:  Pressure ulcers. This patient required reconstruction of an extremely large pressure sore flap with a fillet total thigh flap procedure.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Image

Media file 18:  Pressure ulcers. This picture demonstrates the Girdlestone arthroplasty procedure for femoral head osteomyelitis pyarthrosis of the hip joint. The femur head is removed, and the hip joint space is reconstructed with the vastus lateralis muscle flap.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Illustration

Media file 19:  Pressure ulcers. This patient has a urethral fistula within his pressure ulcer. When he performs the Valsalva maneuver, he leaks urine through this opening.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 20:  Pressure ulcers. Closer view of Image 19. A patient with a urethral fistula within his pressure ulcer. When he performs the Valsalva maneuver, he leaks urine through this opening.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo



  1. Davis JS. Operative treatment of scars following bed sores. Surgery. 1938;3:1.
  2. Kostrubala JG, Greeley PW. The problem of decubitus ulcers in paraplegics. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1947;2:403.
  3. Barbenel JC, Jordan MM, Nicol SM, et al. Incidence of pressure-sores in the Greater Glasgow Health Board area. Lancet. Sep 10 1977;2(8037):548-50. [Medline].
  4. Lindan O, Greenway RM, Piazza JM. Pressure distribution on the surface of the human body. Evaluation in lying and sitting positions using a bed of springs and nails. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. May 1965;46:378-85. [Medline].
  5. Barczak CA, Barnett RI, Childs EJ, et al. Fourth national pressure ulcer prevalence survey. Adv Wound Care. Jul-Aug 1997;10(4):18-26. [Medline].
  6. Daniel RK, Faibisoff B. Muscle coverage of pressure points--the role of myocutaneous flaps. Ann Plast Surg. Jun 1982;8(6):446-52. [Medline].
  7. Evans GR, Lewis VL Jr, Manson PN, et al. Hip joint communication with pressure sore: the refractory wound and the role of Girdlestone arthroplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. Feb 1993;91(2):288-94. [Medline].
  8. Atri SC, Misra J, Bisht D, et al. Use of homologous platelet factors in achieving total healing of recalcitrant skin ulcers. Surgery. Sep 1990;108(3):508-12. [Medline].
  9. Robson MC, Phillips LG, Thomason A, et al. Platelet-derived growth factor BB for the treatment of chronic pressure ulcers. Lancet. Jan 4 1992;339(8784):23-5. [Medline].
  10. Mustoe TA, Cutler NR, Allman RM, et al. A phase II study to evaluate recombinant platelet-derived growth factor- BB in the treatment of stage 3 and 4 pressure ulcers. Arch Surg. Feb 1994;129(2):213-9. [Medline].
  11. Anthony JP, Mathes SJ. Update on chronic osteomyelitis. Clin Plast Surg. Jul 1991;18(3):515-23. [Medline].
  12. Anthony JP, Mathes SJ, Alpert BS. The muscle flap in the treatment of chronic lower extremity osteomyelitis: results in patients over 5 years after treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 1991;88(2):311-8. [Medline].
  13. Bennett RG, Bellantoni MF, Ouslander JG. Air-fluidized bed treatment of nursing home patients with pressure sores. J Am Geriatr Soc. Mar 1989;37(3):235-42. [Medline].
  14. Berkwits L, Yarkony GM, Lewis V. Marjolin's ulcer complicating a pressure ulcer: case report and literature review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Nov 1986;67(11):831-3. [Medline].
  15. Berlowitz DR, Wilking SV. Risk factors for pressure sores. A comparison of cross-sectional and cohort-derived data. J Am Geriatr Soc. Nov 1989;37(11):1043-50. [Medline].
  16. Brown Sequard E. Experimental research applied to physiology and pathology. Med Exam Rec Med Sci. 1852;16:481.
  17. Bruck JC, Büttemeyer R, Grabosch A, et al. More arguments in favor of myocutaneous flaps for the treatment of pelvic pressure sores. Ann Plast Surg. Jan 1991;26(1):85-8. [Medline].
  18. Capen DA. Staged total thigh rotation flap for coverage of chronic recurrent pressure sores. Contemp Orthop. 1988;16:23.
  19. Charcot JM. Lectures on the Diseases of the Nervous System. 2nd ed. Sigerson G, trans. Delivered at La Saltpetriere. Philadelphia: Henry C Lea; 1879.
  20. Colen SR. Pressure sore. In: McCarthy Plastic Surgery. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1990:3797-838.
  21. Crenshaw RP, Vistnes LM. A decade of pressure sore research: 1977-1987. J Rehabil Res Dev. Winter 1989;26(1):63-74. [Medline].
  22. Dansereau JG, Conway H. Closure of decubiti in paraplegics. Report of 2000 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. May 1964;33:474-80. [Medline].
  23. Dinsdale SM. Decubitus ulcers: role of pressure and friction in causation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Apr 1974;55(4):147-52. [Medline].
  24. El-Toraei I, Chung B. The management of pressure sores. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. Sep-Oct 1977;3(5):507-11. [Medline].
  25. Esposito G, Di Caprio G, Ziccardi P, et al. Tissue expansion in the treatment of pressure ulcers. Plast Reconstr Surg. Mar 1991;87(3):501-8. [Medline].
  26. Evans GR, Dufresne CR, Manson PN. Surgical correction of pressure ulcers in an urban center: is it efficacious?. Adv Wound Care. Jan 1994;7(1):40-6. [Medline].
  27. Ferrell BA, Osterweil D, Christenson P. A randomized trial of low-air-loss beds for treatment of pressure ulcers. JAMA. Jan 27 1993;269(4):494-7. [Medline].
  28. Georgiade N, Pickrell K, Maguire C. Total thigh flaps for extensive decubitus ulcers. Plast reconstr surg (1946). Mar 1956;17(3):220-5. [Medline].
  29. Ger R, Levine SA. The management of decubitus ulcers by muscle transposition. An 8-year review. Plast Reconstr Surg. Oct 1976;58(4):419-28. [Medline].
  30. Gould WL, Montero N, Cukic J, et al. The "split" gluteus maximus musculocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. Feb 1994;93(2):330-6. [Medline].
  31. Hill HL, Brown RG, Jurkiewicz MJ. The transverse lumbosacral back flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 1978;62(2):177-84. [Medline].
  32. Hurwitz DJ. The gluteus maximus muscle musculocutaneous flap. In: Serafin D, ed. Atlas of Microsurgical Composite Tissue Transplantation. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1996:259-70.
  33. Hurwitz DJ, Swartz WM, Mathes SJ. The gluteal thigh flap: a reliable, sensate flap for the closure of buttock and perineal wounds. Plast Reconstr Surg. Oct 1981;68(4):521-32. [Medline].
  34. Hurwitz DJ, Walton RL. Closure of chronic wounds of the perineal and sacral regions using the gluteal thigh flap. Ann Plast Surg. May 1982;8(5):375-86. [Medline].
  35. Husain T. An experimental study of some pressure effects on tissues, with reference to the bed-sore problem. J Pathol Bacteriol. Oct 1953;66(2):347-58. [Medline].
  36. Keane FX. The function of the rump in relation to sitting and the Keane Reciprocating Wheelchair Seat. Paraplegia. Feb 1979;16(4):390-402. [Medline].
  37. Koshima I, Moriguchi T, Soeda S, et al. The gluteal perforator-based flap for repair of sacral pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg. Apr 1993;91(4):678-83. [Medline].
  38. Landis DM. Studies of capillary blood pressure in human skin. Heart. 1930;15:209.
  39. Le KM, Madsen BL, Barth PW, et al. An in-depth look at pressure sores using monolithic silicon pressure sensors. Plast Reconstr Surg. Dec 1984;74(6):745-56. [Medline].
  40. Lee HB, Kim SW, Lew DH, et al. Unilateral multilayered musculocutaneous V-Y advancement flap for the treatment of pressure sore. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 1997;100(2):340-5; discussion 346-9. [Medline].
  41. Lewis VL Jr, Bailey MH, Pulawski G, et al. The diagnosis of osteomyelitis in patients with pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg. Feb 1988;81(2):229-32. [Medline].
  42. Lindan O. Etiology of decubitus ulcers: an experimental study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Nov 1961;42:774-83. [Medline].
  43. Mancoll JS, Phillips LG. Pressure sores. In: Archaeur BM, Eriksson E, Guyuron B et al, eds. Plastic Surgery, Indication Operations and Outcomes. St. Louis: Mosby; 2000:447-62.
  44. Mandrekas AD, Mastorakos DP. The management of decubitus ulcers by musculocutaneous flaps: a five-year experience. Ann Plast Surg. Feb 1992;28(2):167-74. [Medline].
  45. Manley MT. Incidence, contributory factors and costs of pressure sores. S Afr Med J. Feb 11 1978;53(6):217-22. [Medline].
  46. Mathes SJ, Nahai F. Gluteus maximus gluteal thigh flap chapter. In: Reconstructive Surgery, Principles, Anatomy, and Technique. New York: Churchill Livingston; 1997:501-35.
  47. Minami RT, Mills R, Pardoe R. Gluteus maximus myocutaneous flaps for repair of pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 1977;60(2):242-9. [Medline].
  48. Moss RJ, La Puma J. The ethics of pressure sore prevention and treatment in the elderly: a practical approach. J Am Geriatr Soc. Sep 1991;39(9):905-8. [Medline].
  49. Munro D. Care of back following spinal cord injuries. N Engl J Med. 1940;223:391.
  50. Mustoe T, Upton J, Marcellino V, et al. Carcinoma in chronic pressure sores: a fulminant disease process. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jan 1986;77(1):116-21. [Medline].
  51. Nahai F. The tensor fascia lata flap. In: Serafin D, ed. Atlas of Microsurgical Composite Tissue Transplantation. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1996:271-81.
  52. Nahai F, Silverton JS, Hill HL, et al. The tensor fascia lata musculocutaneous flap. Ann Plast Surg. Jul 1978;1(4):372-9. [Medline].
  53. Nola GT, Vistnes LM. Differential response of skin and muscle in the experimental production of pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 1980;66(5):728-33. [Medline].
  54. Paletta C, Bartell T, Shehadi S. Applications of the posterior thigh flap. Ann Plast Surg. Jan 1993;30(1):41-7. [Medline].
  55. Pena MM, Drew GS, Smith SJ, et al. The inferiorly based rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for reconstruction of recurrent pressure sores. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jan 1992;89(1):90-5. [Medline].
  56. Petersen NC, Bittmann S. The epidemiology of pressure sores. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1971;5(1):62-6. [Medline].
  57. Pownell PH. Pressure sores. Selected Readings in Plastic Surgery. Plast Surg. 1995;7(39):1-27.
  58. Ramirez OM, Hurwitz DJ, Futrell JW. The expansive gluteus maximus flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. Dec 1984;74(6):757-70. [Medline].
  59. Robson MC, Phillips LG, Thomason A, et al. Recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB for the treatment of chronic pressure ulcers. Ann Plast Surg. Sep 1992;29(3):193-201. [Medline].
  60. Royer J, Pickrell K, Georgiade N, et al. Total thigh flaps for extensive decubitus ulcers. A 16 year review of 41 total thigh flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 1969;44(2):109-18. [Medline].
  61. Sekiguchi J, Kobayashi S, Ohmori K. Free sensory and nonsensory plantar flap transfers in the treatment of ischial decubitus ulcers. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jan 1995;95(1):156-65. [Medline].
  62. Siegler EL, Lavizzo-Mourey R. Management of stage III pressure ulcers in moderately demented nursing home residents. J Gen Intern Med. Nov-Dec 1991;6(6):507-13. [Medline].
  63. Stal S, Serure A, Donovan W, et al. The perioperative management of the patient with pressure sores. Ann Plast Surg. Oct 1983;11(4):347-56. [Medline].
  64. Stallings JO, Delgado JP, Converse JM. Turnover island flap of gluteus maximus muscle for the repair of sacral decubitus ulcer. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jul 1974;54(1):52-4. [Medline].
  65. Stevenson TR, Pollock RA, Rohrich RJ, et al. The gluteus maximus musculocutaneous island flap: refinements in design and application. Plast Reconstr Surg. May 1987;79(5):761-8. [Medline].
  66. Thompson RJ. Pathological changes in mummies. Proc R Soc Med. 1961;54:409.
  67. Tobin GR, Brown GL, Derr JW, et al. V-Y advancement flaps. Reusable flaps for pressure ulcer repair. Clin Plast Surg. Oct 1990;17(4):727-32. [Medline].
  68. Witkowski JA, Parish LC. Histopathology of the decubitus ulcer. J Am Acad Dermatol. Jun 1982;6(6):1014-21. [Medline].
  69. Yamamoto Y, Ohura T, Shintomi Y, et al. Superiority of the fasciocutaneous flap in reconstruction of sacral pressure sores. Ann Plast Surg. Feb 1993;30(2):116-21. [Medline].

Pressure Ulcers, Surgical Treatment and Principles excerpt

Article Last Updated: Aug 5, 2008