Continually Updated Clinical Reference
 
 
  All Sources     eMedicine     Medscape     Drug Reference     MEDLINE
 
eMedicine - Breast Reconstruction: TRAM, Unipedicled : Article by

Quick Find
Authors & Editors
Introduction
Indications
Relevant Anatomy
Contraindications
Workup
Treatment
Complications
Multimedia
References




Patient Education
Women's Health Center

Cancer and Tumors Center

Mastectomy Overview

Mastectomy Preparation

Breast Lumps and Pain Overview

Breast Self-Exam

Breast Cancer Overview




Author: Michael R Zenn, MD, FACS, Associate Professor, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Program Director of Plastic Surgery Residency, Duke University Medical Center

Michael R Zenn is a member of the following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American Association of Plastic Surgeons, American College of Surgeons, American Medical Association, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, American Society of Reconstructive Microsurgery, North Carolina Medical Society, Phi Beta Kappa, Plastic Surgery Research Council, Southeastern Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons, and World Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery

Editors: Geoffrey L Robb, MD, Chair, Professor, Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine; Saleh M Shenaq, MD, Director and Founder, The International Brachial Plexus Institute; Chief, Section of Plastic Surgery, Methodist Hospital, Houston; Nick Slenkovich, MD, Practice Director, Colorado Plastic Surgery Center; Al Aly, MD, FACS, Consulting Surgeon, Iowa City Plastic Surgery

Author and Editor Disclosure

Synonyms and related keywords: breast reconstruction, transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap, TRAM flap, autogenous tissue reconstruction, unipedicled TRAM flap, mastectomy, foreign body reactions, capsular contractures

Breast reconstruction entered the modern era with the introduction of the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap in 1982 by Hartrampf, Scheflan, and Black. This ingenious procedure reliably transfers autogenous tissue from the abdomen for breast reconstruction and has the added benefit of abdominal rejuvenation (see Image 1). This procedure now constitutes 25-50% of breast reconstructions performed in the United States, and the TRAM flap has proven the autogenous tissue of choice for breast reconstruction.

The main advantage of the procedure lies in the consistency of the reconstructed breast; it is similar to the natural breast in softness and in the way the tissue drapes on the chest. Because the tissue is part of the patient's body, it does not incite foreign body reaction or capsular contractures, which have plagued implant reconstructions. Furthermore, since scars fade and tissues soften, the reconstruction only improves over time, which is not true of implant reconstructions. When performed properly in the properly selected patient, the TRAM flap procedure produces a breast reconstruction superior to any other technique.



TRAM flap reconstruction may be considered in any patient who is undergoing mastectomy as either an immediate procedure (at the time of mastectomy) or as a delayed procedure (sometime after mastectomy). If chest wall radiation has been or will be part of the patient's therapy, reconstruction is delayed. The patient must be psychologically motivated and have adequate tissues in the abdominal area to be considered for a TRAM flap. Although implant reconstruction and tissue reconstruction may be considered for any patient, some relative indications favor the TRAM flap procedure.

  • Radical mastectomy defect with large tissue requirement

  • History of radiation to the chest wall

  • Large opposite breast (difficult to match with an implant)

  • Small opposite breast (difficult to match with an implant)

  • Previous failure of implant reconstruction

  • Excess lower abdominal tissue and patient desires abdominoplasty



The flap skin and fat of a single pedicle TRAM flap reconstruction survive on perforators through the rectus abdominis muscle. Although this muscle has a dual blood supply, the superior epigastric artery and the inferior epigastric artery, this operation relies only on the superior epigastric arterial system. Because of the distant nature of this blood supply, only tissues directly over or immediately adjacent to the muscle have adequate vascularity. If more tissues are needed, consider other procedures (midabdominal TRAM, delay procedure, double pedicle TRAM, super-charged TRAM, free TRAM flap, deep inferior epigastric perforator flap "DIEP").



The TRAM flap operation is major surgery and should not be undertaken lightly by the patient or surgeon. Over fifteen years of experience with these procedures enables the author to identify certain characteristics that place patients at higher risk for complications.

  • Cardiac disease (ie, myocardial infarction, angina, congestive heart failure)

  • Pulmonary disease (ie, emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease)

  • History of pulmonary embolus or deep venous thrombosis

  • Collagen-vascular disease, lupus, scleroderma, polyarteritis, (small vessel disease)

  • Unstable psychiatric disease

  • Obesity (>25% ideal body weight)

  • Older patient (physiologic age older than 70 y)

  • Cigarette smoking; unwilling to quit

  • Previous abdominal surgery that has interrupted blood supply to the TRAM flap

Because of the magnitude of the procedure and the degree of stress on the lungs and heart, this operation may unmask baseline cardiopulmonary disease and result in a complicated course for the patient. In addition, anything that causes small vessel disease, such as the medical conditions listed above, diabetes, or cigarette smoking, may cause complications in the transferred tissue and in the abdominal donor site. Any of the above characteristics contraindicate a TRAM flap, thus the surgeon should seek another method of reconstruction.

Although not an absolute contraindication, advise patients who wish to have more children to consider another method of reconstruction. Many reports exist of patients who undergo TRAM experiencing full-term natural childbirth; the concern mostly centers on the diminished compliance of the abdominal wall, especially when synthetic mesh was used. Patients who desire no or little muscle to be removed with the TRAM flap should consider a free TRAM or deep inferior epigastric perforator [DIEP] flap.



Lab Studies

  • Preoperative laboratory examination is directed by the patient's medical condition. At minimum, obtain CBC count, electrolytes, urinalysis, ECG, and blood type and screen.

Imaging Studies

  • Chest radiographs



Surgical Therapy

More than one procedure is required for a successful TRAM flap breast reconstruction.

Stage I - TRAM flap

This may be performed at mastectomy or some time afterward. Belly tissues are used to create the breast mound, and this stage may include a procedure on the opposite breast for optimal symmetry. The operation may last from 4-8 hours. During this procedure, 90% of the reconstructive work is performed. Some surgeons now "delay" their TRAM flaps with an outpatient procedure 2 weeks prior to the TRAM flap procedure, dividing the inferior epigastric blood vessels, training the TRAM tissues to rely on the superior epigastric system. This step is not required for successful unipedicle TRAM reconstruction but can improve blood supply to the flap. So-called delay procedures may effectively eliminate the possibility of performing microsurgery ("supercharging") if the pedicled flap has any arterial or venous insufficiency problems, since the vessels divided in the "delay" cannot be used.

Stage II - Revisions and nipple reconstruction

Approximately 3-4 months after the TRAM flap procedure, tissues have settled enough and scar tissue has relaxed enough to perform small revisions and reconstruction of the nipple. This often can take place in an office setting. All adjuvant therapies should be completed, and the patient should have regained her preoperative energy level. If some loss of the transferred tissues has resulted in fat necrosis, remove these firm areas and reshape the mound to allow a soft breast reconstruction during this stage. This allows the chest to be examined more easily over time for evidence of cancer recurrence.

If the breast mound revision is major, delay nipple reconstruction another 3-4 months to accurately position nipple reconstruction. Nipple reconstruction can be performed as a local tissue rearrangement or as a graft from the opposite nipple. The anatomy of the patient and the preference of the surgeon dictate the choice.

Stage III - Nipple and areolar tattoo

This final procedure, which is performed in the office, adds color to the breast reconstruction. This finishing touch to the reconstruction helps make the reconstructed breast more symmetric with the opposite breast and minimizes the visual effect of other scars that may be present on the breast mound. The tattoo usually is performed 2 months after nipple creation, as the scar tissues are softer and facilitate pigment uptake in the scar.

Preoperative Details

Consultation is required so that the patient understands the magnitude of the procedure she is about to undergo. Consultation should include discussion of possible complications, necessary scars, and the opportunity to view pictures of an average TRAM flap result. For some patients, speaking to a prior patient who was once in a similar situation is helpful. Answer all questions so that the patient has realistic expectations.

The degree of preparation necessary for such a large procedure often is limited by the need to perform the mastectomy in a timely fashion. Preoperative instructions include the following:

  • Autogenous blood donation: Donate 2 units up to 2 weeks preoperatively.

  • Abdominal conditioning: Patient should perform abdominal exercises to strengthen the muscle to be used and to improve blood supply to the muscle.

  • Perform bowel preparation the day before surgery.

For patients at higher risk (see Contraindications) or who require more tissue for the reconstruction, consider a delay procedure, a bipedicle TRAM flap, or a free TRAM flap. If radiation is to be administered postoperatively, delay the reconstructive procedure at least 6 months to allow the chest tissues to heal completely to lower possible complications during elective reconstruction.

Intraoperative Details

In planning the location of the TRAM flap, it is advantageous to leave the scar as low as possible, similar to an abdominoplasty. However, the patient should remember that the location of the fat ultimately dictates the level of the scar. If adequate tissue to create a sufficient mound is not present over and immediately adjacent to the muscle, select an alternative technique.

  • An ipsilateral or contralateral pedicle may be used.

  • The entire rectus muscle may be included or the muscle may be split. Either way, the muscle is denervated and its function impaired. Splitting the muscle is more time consuming and is potentially hazardous to the blood supply of the flap. Some surgeons believe that splitting the muscle helps the closure of the abdomen. For patients who want minimal or no muscle harvested with the TRAM flap, consider a free TRAM flap or DIEP flap.

  • Divide the rectus muscle from its pubic insertion, allowing superior rotation of the flap through a tunnel to the mastectomy site. Spare the superior epigastric vessels, as they provide the blood supply to the transferred tissue.

  • Begin abdominal closure with closure of the fascia. This can be performed primarily or with synthetic mesh depending on the patient's anatomy and the preference of the surgeon.

  • Additional liposuction and skin tailoring may be necessary to achieve the optimal aesthetic result.

  • In most patients relocation of the umbilicus is necessary, and it appears as a new umbilicus in a similar position as preoperatively.

  • Shaping and creation of the breast mound expresses the surgeon's artistic abilities. Match the opposite mound by positioning the tissues, folding the flap, and other maneuvers. The surgeon always must anticipate the effects of healing, scar tissue, gravity, and mound shrinkage (approximately 10%) during the initial shaping to limit the need for revisions. These factors may vary greatly between patients, and the patient should expect revisions.
  • In skin-sparing mastectomy, only the nipple and areola are removed with the breast tissue; the breast skin is spared. The reconstructive burden is lessened and most of the skin of the TRAM flap is removed, which allows the breast envelope to be filled with abdominal fat (see Images 2-7).

Postoperative Details

  • An uncomplicated TRAM flap requires 4-5 days of hospitalization.

  • Ambulation begins on the first postoperative day.

  • To remove tension on the abdominal closure, place the patient in a flexed position at the waist for the first few days; an upright position is possible by the end of the first week.

  • Drain tubes are necessary and are usually in place for 1-2 weeks.

  • Patients require 6 weeks to 2 months to regain their energy level and resume normal activities.

  • Begin full range-of-motion exercises for the shoulder at 10-14 days postoperatively.

  • Patients may resume abdominal exercises in 8 weeks.

  • Anesthesia of the mastectomy site and central abdomen resolves over the next 6-12 months. The degree of sensory reinnervation to the TRAM flap is variable and patient dependent.

  • Because of the tight closure of the underlying muscle fascia of the abdomen, most patients experience a painless tight feeling for many months.

  • Patients with preexisting back pain may have an exacerbation of this pain from the procedure and may want to consider an alternative method of reconstruction (eg, implant reconstruction).

  • Prolonged convalescence and discomfort coupled with a cancer diagnosis may be depressing and emotionally draining.

Follow-up

  • Once the patient and surgeon are satisfied with the breast reconstruction, maintenance is minimal.

  • Mammography of the reconstructed breast is not required.

  • The patient should continue self-examination.

  • Examine new lumps or masses by physical examination, mammography, or, if indicated, by biopsy.

  • If present, fat necrosis is noted early as an area of firmness that does not resolve over time. During the first revision, remove all areas of fat necrosis to obtain a soft mound without palpable masses, allowing for surveillance for recurrent breast cancer.

For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Women's Health Center and Cancer and Tumors Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education articles Mastectomy, Breast Lumps and Pain, Breast Self-Exam, and Breast Cancer.



The TRAM flap procedure is performed daily and safely by plastic surgeons for many grateful patients. Because of the magnitude of the procedure, complications can occur even in the best of hands. Possible complications from a TRAM flap procedure are listed below. Fortunately, major complications are uncommon.

  • Fat necrosis and/or partial flap loss (5-15% of patients)

  • Complete loss of TRAM tissue ( <1% of patients)

  • Seroma (fluid collection, usually in abdominal donor site)

  • Hematoma (bleeding at either chest or abdomen)

  • Infection

  • Hernia (1-5% of patients)

  • Abdominal bulge without hernia (5-15% of patients)

  • Deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolus ( <1% of patients)

  • Death ( <1% of patients)



Media file 1:  Blood supply to the unipedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap. Note the superior epigastric supply and the shaded area of the TRAM flap to be discarded.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 2:  Patient 1: The small-breasted patient did not want contralateral augmentation, and it would be difficult to match her breasts with an implant alone.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 3:  Patient 1: Postoperative view after unipedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstruction. This small breast with ptosis would be impossible to achieve with an implant.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type: 

Media file 4:  Patient 2: A full C cup breast and an ample abdomen for an unipedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous reconstruction
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 5:  Patient 2: Postoperatively after unipedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and nipple reconstruction. Note the improvement in the patient's abdominal appearance, a benefit of this type of reconstruction. She has been encouraged to return for re-application of the removed portion of her tattoo.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 6:  Patient 3: The patient's right lateral scar during initial biopsy precludes a true skin-sparing approach. With ample abdominal tissue, she is an excellent candidate for unipedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous reconstruction.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 7:  Patient 3: Postoperative view after unipedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstruction. Note the abdominal skin replacing the removed skin to maintain breast shape. The patient does not desire nipple reconstruction.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo



  • Bostwick J. Abdominal flap reconstruction. In: Plastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery. 2nd ed. St. Louis, Mo: Quality Medical Publishing, Inc; 2000:981-1146.
  • Erdmann D, Sundin BM, Moquin KJ, et al. Delay in unipedicled TRAM flap reconstruction of the breast: a review of 76 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. Sep 1 2002;110(3):762-7. [Medline].
  • Hartrampf CR Jr. The transverse abdominal island flap for breast reconstruction. A 7-year experience. Clin Plast Surg. Oct 1988;15(4):703-16. [Medline].
  • Hudson DA. The surgically delayed unipedicled TRAM flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. Mar 1996;36(3):238-42; discussion 242-5. [Medline].
  • Lejour M, Dome M. Abdominal wall function after rectus abdominis transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jun 1991;87(6):1054-68. [Medline].
  • Moon HK, Taylor GI. The vascular anatomy of rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps based on the deep superior epigastric system. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 1988;82(5):815-32. [Medline].
  • Nahabedian MY, Momen B, Galdino G, Manson PN. Breast Reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg. Aug 2002;110(2):466-75; discussion 476-7. [Medline].
  • Shaw WW, Orringer JS, Ko CY, et al. The spontaneous return of sensibility in breasts reconstructed with autologous tissues. Plast Reconstr Surg. Feb 1997;99(2):394-9. [Medline].
  • Shestak KC. Technical tips for avoiding complications in TRAM flap breast reconstruction. In: Reoperative Plastic Surgery of the Breast. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams and Williams; 2006:302-39.
  • Slavin SA, Goldwyn RM. The midabdominal rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap: review of 236 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. Feb 1988;81(2):189-99. [Medline].
  • Spear SL, Ducic I, Low M, Cuoco F. The effect of radiation on pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction: outcomes and implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. Jan 2005;115(1):84-95. [Medline].
  • Zenn MR, May JW Jr. TRAM flap reconstruction: the single pedicle, whole muscle technique. In: Spear SL, ed. Surgery of the Breast: Principles and Art. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 2006:732-40.
  • Zienowicz RJ, May JW Jr. Hernia prevention and aesthetic contouring of the abdomen following TRAM flap breast reconstruction by the use of polypropylene mesh. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 1995;96(6):1346-50. [Medline].

Breast Reconstruction: TRAM, Unipedicled excerpt

Article Last Updated: May 4, 2007