AUTHOR AND EDITOR INFORMATION

Section 1 of 10  

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction
• Clinical
• Differentials
• Workup
• Treatment
• Medication
• Follow-up
• Miscellaneous
• References

INTRODUCTION

Section 2 of 10  

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction
• Clinical
• Differentials
• Workup
• Treatment
• Medication
• Follow-up
• Miscellaneous
• References

Background

Many food proteins can act as antigens in humans. Cow's milk proteins are most frequently implicated as a cause of food intolerance during infancy. Soybean protein ranks second as an antigen in the first months of life, particularly in infants with primary cow's milk intolerance who are placed on a soy formula. From school age on, egg protein intolerance becomes more prevalent.

Several clinical reactions to food proteins have been reported in children and adults. Only a few of these have a clear allergic immunoglobulin E (IgE)–mediated pathogenesis. For this reason, the term "food protein intolerance" is usually preferred to "food protein allergy," in order to include all offending specific reactions to food proteins, no matter the pathogenesis. In children, GI symptoms are generally most common, with a frequency ranging from 50-80%, followed by cutaneous symptoms (20-40%), and respiratory symptoms (4-25%).

Pathophysiology

The major food allergens are water-soluble glycoproteins (molecular weight [MW], 10,000-60,000) that are resistant to heat, acid, and enzymes. The GI tract is permeable to intact antigens. The antigen uptake is an endocytotic process that involves intracellular lysosomes. Some antigens can move through intercellular gaps; however, the penetration of antigens through the mucosal barrier is not usually associated with clinical symptoms. Under normal circumstances, food antigen exposure via the GI tract results in a local immunoglobulin A (IgA) response and in an activation of suppressor CD8⁺ lymphocytes that reside in the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (oral tolerance).

In some children who are genetically susceptible, or for other as-of-yet-unknown reasons, oral tolerance does not develop, and different immunologic and inflammatory mechanisms can be elicited. Whether nonimmunologic mechanisms can have a role in the development of specific intolerances to food proteins is still disputed.

Some evidence suggests that reduced microbial exposure during infancy and early childhood result in a slower postnatal maturation of the immune system and delay in the progression to an optimal balance between T_H1 and T_H2 immunity (hygiene hypothesis). The T_H1/T_H2 imbalance is crucial to the clinical expression of allergy and asthma. Genetic variations in receptors for bacterial products are likely to be related to allergic sensitizations. On the other hand, intestinal infections may increase paracellular permeability, allowing the absorption of food proteins without epithelial processing. As a consequence, infectious exposures can be an important contributory factor in the pathogenesis of food protein allergies.

Frequency

United States

In a national survey of pediatric allergists, the prevalence rate of cow's milk allergy was reported to be 3.4%, whereas the prevalence rate of soy protein allergy was 1.1%.

International

Incidence of food allergy in children has been variously estimated at 0.3-8%, and the incidence decreases with age. Food allergies affect 6-8% of infants younger than 2 years. In a cohort of 1,749 newborns from the municipality of Odense in Denmark who were prospectively monitored for the development of cow's milk protein intolerance during the first year of life, a 1-year incidence of 2.2% was reported.¹

Mortality/Morbidity

Most of the cases of food protein intolerance can be resolved with dietary management. A few cases of severe anaphylactic reactions to food proteins have been reported.

Race

No race predilection has been observed.

Sex

No sex predilection is known, but males are slightly more frequently affected with eosinophilic gastroenteritis.

Age

Food allergy is mainly a problem in infancy and early childhood. Cow's milk allergy or intolerance usually develops in early infancy. In most of the cases, the onset of symptoms is closely related to the time of introduction of formula based on cow's milk.

An unselected prospective study indicated that 42% of infants who developed cow's milk protein intolerance were symptomatic within 7 days (and 70% within 4 wk) following the introduction of cow's milk.² Cow's milk protein intolerance has been diagnosed in 1.9-2.8% of general populations of infants aged 2 years or younger in different countries of northern Europe, but incidence fell to approximately 0.3% in children older than 3 years.

Protein intolerance is generally believed to remit by age 5 years, when the infant's mucosal immune system matures and the child becomes immunologically tolerant of milk proteins; in most affected children, symptoms resolve by age 1-2 years. However, cow's milk protein intolerance may persist or may initially manifest in older children, demonstrating characteristic endoscopic and histopathologic features; it occasionally recurs in adults.

CLINICAL

Section 3 of 10  

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction
• Clinical
• Differentials
• Workup
• Treatment
• Medication
• Follow-up
• Miscellaneous
• References

History

Numerous symptoms can be a consequence of food protein intolerance. GI manifestations are the most common clinical presentation, usually without involvement of other organ systems. Most cases of food protein intolerance in the pediatric population occur in the first months of life as a consequence of cow's milk protein intolerance.

The typical history is that of an infant younger than 6 months who is fed for a few weeks with formula and who then develops diarrhea and, eventually, vomiting. In the case of the common enterocolitis syndrome, the infant can become dehydrated and lose weight. In the rare instance of cow's milk enteropathy, a malabsorption syndrome develops, with growth failure and hypoalbuminemia. On the other hand, the common food-induced proctocolitis syndrome is characterized by diarrhea in a healthy infant without any weight loss.

Food allergic reactions may be divided into quick-onset reactions, which occur within an hour of food ingestion and are usually IgE-mediated (eg, skin rashes, urticaria, angioedema, wheezing, anaphylaxis), and slow-onset reactions, which take hours or days to develop and are usually non–IgE-mediated.

The most common and specific symptoms of food protein intolerance are as follows:

• GI symptoms
• • Oral allergy syndrome: Oral allergy syndrome is a form of IgE-mediated contact allergy that is almost exclusively confined to the oropharynx and is most commonly associated with the ingestion of various fresh fruits and vegetables. Oral allergy syndrome mainly affects adults who have pollen allergy (especially to ragweed, birch, and mugwort). Symptoms include itching; burning; and angioedema of the lips, tongue, palate, and throat. The clinical picture is usually short-lived, but symptoms may be more prominent after the ragweed season.
  • Immediate GI hypersensitivity: GI anaphylaxis is defined as an IgE-mediated GI reaction that often accompanies allergic manifestations in other organs, such as the skin or lungs. Bioptic samples show a significant decrease in stainable mast cells and tissue histamine after the challenge. The reaction usually occurs within minutes to 2 hours of food ingestion. Within 1-2 hours, the patient develops nausea, abdominal pain, and vomiting. After 2 hours, diarrhea ensues. In children with atopic eczema and food allergy, subclinical reactions have been described. Poor appetite, poor weight gain, and intermittent abdominal pain are frequent symptoms.
  • Esophageal eosinophilia: Esophageal eosinophilia that persists despite traditional antireflux therapy may represent a sign of allergic esophagitis. Allergic eosinophilic esophagitis is characterized by chronic esophagitis, with or without reflux. Affected children present with intermittent vomiting, food refusal, abdominal pain, and failure to respond to conventional reflux medications. Occasionally, esophageal strictures develop.
  • Eosinophilic gastritis: Eosinophilic gastritis that is responsive to elimination diets has occasionally been reported. Symptoms and signs are those usual for gastritis of different etiologies, such as postprandial vomiting, abdominal pain, anorexia, early satiety, and failure to thrive. Approximately half of these patients have atopic features.
  • Eosinophilic gastroenteritis: Eosinophilic gastroenteritis is an ill-defined disease that is pathologically characterized by the infiltration of eosinophils in the mucosa of the GI tract. The syndrome has been reported in children of all ages. Diagnosis requires symptoms related to the GI tract and a bioptic sample showing an eosinophilic infiltration. Unfortunately, no clear-cut line can be drawn to distinguish eosinophilic gastroenteritis from other GI diseases and from nonpathologic eosinophilic infiltration of the lower intestine.
  • Food protein–induced enterocolitis syndrome
  • • Food protein–induced enterocolitis syndrome describes a symptom complex of profuse vomiting and diarrhea diagnosed in infancy, involving both the small and the large intestine.
    • Food-induced enterocolitis syndrome occurs most frequently in the first months of life. Most cases are observed in infants younger than 3 months.
    • Cow's milk and soy protein are most often responsible.
    • Symptoms include protracted vomiting and diarrhea. Vomiting generally occurs 1-3 hours after feeding, and diarrhea occurs 5-8 hours after feeding.
    • Specific descriptions of the histologic findings are not available because the diagnosis can be made clinically. Some small bowel specimens show mild villous injury with inflammatory infiltration, whereas colonic specimens reveal crypt abscesses and a diffuse inflammatory infiltrate.
    • A similar enterocolitis syndrome has been reported in older infants and children as a consequence of intolerance to different food proteins (eg, eggs, fish, nuts, peanuts, other proteins).
  • Food-induced enteropathy: Cow's milk proteins and soy proteins can cause an uncommon syndrome of chronic diarrhea, weight loss, and failure to thrive, similar to that appearing in celiac disease. Vomiting is present in up to two thirds of patients. Small bowel biopsy findings reveal an enteropathy of variable degrees with villous hypotrophy. Total mucosal atrophy, histologically indistinguishable from celiac disease, is a frequent finding. Intestinal protein and blood losses can aggravate the hypoalbuminemia and anemia that are frequently observed in this syndrome. The nonceliac food-induced enteropathy has been less frequent and less severe in the last 25 years. More recent cases described patients who presented with patchy intestinal lesions. Usually, the syndrome affects infants in the first months of life.
  • Gluten-sensitive enteropathy: See Celiac Disease.
  • Protein-losing enteropathy: Protein-losing enteropathy is a common finding in children with cow's milk protein intolerance. Some infants can present with pronounced protein-losing symptoms after introduction of cow's milk.
  • Food-induced proctocolitis: Food-induced proctocolitis usually occurs in the first few months of life. Cow's milk and soy proteins are most often responsible, but 60% of reported infants were exclusively breastfed. In most of the latter cases, a strict maternal diet (including the elimination of all cow's milk–based products from their diets) can resolve the problem. Symptoms include diarrhea and blood in the stools. Affected infants generally appear healthy and have normal weight gain. The onset of bleeding is gradual and initially erratic over several days. It then progresses to streaks of blood in most stools that can elicit suspicion of an internal anal tear. Bowel lesions are generally confined to the distal large bowel.
  • Chronic constipation due to cow's milk intolerance: Chronic constipation as the sole symptom of intolerance to cow's milk was described in 1993. However, chronic constipation was not considered a feature of cow's milk intolerance until 1998, when an Italian study hypothesized that intolerance to cow's milk can cause severe perianal lesions with pain upon defecation and subsequent constipation in young children.³ An allergic colitis, with resolution of the symptoms after removal of milk from the diet, was subsequently demonstrated in 4 newborns with constipation. Therefore, in a small subgroup of children with constipation, cow's milk protein intolerance can be the cause of symptoms.
  • Infantile colic
  • • Infantile colic is the usual name given to a prolonged pattern of crying or fussing in infants, even if the pathophysiology of this distressing behavior has not yet been elucidated. Numerous theories on the pathogenesis have been published, and many, often conflicting, therapeutic approaches have been suggested.
    • Cow's milk intolerance has been implicated as a cause of colic, at least in some formula-fed infants. Some studies have suggested that an elimination diet that substitutes cow's milk formula with a soy-based formula or a protein-hydrolysate can relieve the symptoms of infantile colic in a significant percentage of cases. In these infants, challenge with cow's milk proteins usually causes a recrudescence of the crying crises. The infants who respond to the elimination diet are usually those with more prolonged crying crises, and they often have a familial history of allergy. Most often, other signs of cow's milk protein intolerance develop in the following weeks or months.
    • Studies including a selected population of infants report percentages of responses to the elimination diet to be as high as 89%. One blind study showed that 18% of infants with colic improved with soy formula, whereas 0% improved in another blind study. Moreover, in most of the responsive infants, the duration of the effect is not sustained, despite an ongoing elimination diet. In any case, true food protein intolerance can only be demonstrated in a small subgroup of infants with colic.
  • Multiple food protein intolerance of infancy: Some infants are intolerant to cow's milk proteins, soy, extensively hydrolyzed formulas, and a wide range of other food proteins. Most of these children develop symptoms while they are receiving only breast milk. Symptoms remit after feeding with an elemental amino acid–based complete infant formula.
• Dermatologic symptoms
• • Symptoms include urticaria, angioedema, rashes, and atopic eczema.
  • Atopic dermatitis is one of the most common symptoms of protein intolerance. Approximately one third of children with atopic dermatitis have a diagnosis of cow's milk protein allergy and cow's milk protein intolerance, according to elimination diet and challenge tests, and about 20-40% of children younger than 1 year with protein intolerance have atopic dermatitis. Most children with atopic dermatitis and protein intolerance develop a complete tolerance in a few years.
  • Umbilical and periumbilical erythema has been related to cow’s milk protein intolerance in a group of 384 Italian infants; this bizarre sign was observed in 36 cases (9.4%), disappeared within the second week on elimination diet, and reappeared within 24 hours after challenge.⁴
• Respiratory symptoms: These symptoms include rhinitis and asthma.
• General symptoms: Anaphylaxis due to cow's milk protein intolerance is a rare but well-described event. The child, usually a young infant, suddenly becomes pale and cold and sweats. The child usually presents with urticaria or angioedema and goes into shock within minutes after milk ingestion. Anaphylaxis following ingestion of soy protein is exceptionally rare, even though a survey in Sweden identified 4 cases of death caused by soy protein anaphylaxis.⁵
• Nonspecific symptoms: Many more nonspecific GI reactions have been ascribed to food allergy, including oral aphthae, pyloric stenosis, and bowel edema and obstruction. For most of these manifestations, a clear correlation with an immune reaction to foods has never been established.

Physical

Usually, the GI manifestations are isolated, without any sign of atopic dermatitis, urticaria, rhinitis, conjunctivitis, or wheezing.

• In proctocolitis syndrome, the child (usually a young infant) appears healthy, without any weight loss or other physical problems.
• In food-induced GI anaphylaxis, these symptoms (eg, atopic dermatitis, urticaria, rhinitis, conjunctivitis, wheezing) can occur, and, therefore, the child must be checked for the presence of systemic signs of allergic reaction.
• The infant with enterocolitis syndrome can be dehydrated as a consequence of diarrhea, vomiting, or both. Signs of dehydration include blunted eyes, dry mucous membranes, and hypoelastic skin.
• In the unusual instances of nonceliac food-induced enteropathy, infants present with signs and symptoms of malabsorption syndrome. Dystrophy, growth failure, edema (hypoalbuminemia), rickets (vitamin D malabsorption), and hemorrhages (vitamin K malabsorption) can all be present.

Causes

Many food proteins can act as an antigen in humans. Cow's milk proteins are most frequently implicated as a cause of food intolerance during infancy. Soybean protein is the second most frequent antigen in the first months of life, particularly in infants with primary cow's milk intolerance.

DIFFERENTIALS

Section 4 of 10  

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction
• Clinical
• Differentials
• Workup
• Treatment
• Medication
• Follow-up
• Miscellaneous
• References

Other Problems to be Considered

Enteropathy
Celiac disease
Autoimmune enteropathy
Intractable diarrhea of infancy
Intestinal infections

Enterocolitis syndrome
Intestinal infections
Inflammatory bowel diseases

Proctocolitis
Anal fissures
Meckel diverticulum
Intestinal duplication
Intestinal hemangiomas
Intestinal infections
Inflammatory bowel disease

WORKUP

Section 5 of 10  

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction
• Clinical
• Differentials
• Workup
• Treatment
• Medication
• Follow-up
• Miscellaneous
• References

Lab Studies

• Radioallergosorbent test (RAST): RAST is often used to screen for antigen-specific IgE in the patient's serum.
• Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA): ELISAs have been replacing methods that use radiation. Unfortunately, determination of specific IgE involves the same problems as the skin test. A negative test result has a high predictive accuracy with a low sensitivity, whereas a positive test result has a low predictive value.
• Fecal leukocytes: Fecal eosinophils are a significant clue to the diagnosis of allergic colitis. However, although eosinophils predominate after a single acute challenge, the findings on fecal smears at diagnosis are more likely of the inflammatory type, with a predominant population of lymphocytes and neutrophils and a small number of eosinophils.
• Allergic eosinophilic esophagitis
• • Total serum IgE is within the reference range or slightly elevated.
  • Peripheral eosinophilia is uncommon.
  • Skin test and RAST results are frequently negative.
  • Results of pH testing can be pathologic or normal.
  • Esophageal biopsy reveals infiltration of the mucosa and submucosa with eosinophils.
• Allergic eosinophilic gastritis
• • The IgE level is elevated in approximately half of patients.
  • Peripheral eosinophilia is present in approximately half of patients.
  • Gastric biopsy findings reveal marked infiltration of the mucosa and submucosa with eosinophils (especially in the gastric antrum).
• Allergic eosinophilic gastroenteritis
• • Peripheral eosinophilia is commonly found but is not reliable as a diagnostic criterion.
  • Diagnosis requires a biopsy specimen showing an eosinophilic infiltration of the mucosa and submucosa.
  • Unfortunately, no standards for making the histologic diagnosis are recognized. In infants and children without GI symptoms, eosinophilic counts in the gastric fundus and antrum are consistently low, but in the terminal ileum, cecum, and proximal colon, an eosinophil count as high as 30 per high-power field can be detected.
• Immediate GI hypersensitivity
• • Prick tests and RAST results are usually positive.
  • Fluoroscopy studies show gastric hypotonia, prominent pylorospasm, and subsequent increased or decreased peristaltic activity of the intestine.
• Enterocolitis syndrome
• • Prick tests and RAST results are usually negative.
  • Stools generally contain occult blood, neutrophils, and eosinophils. The jejunal biopsy findings reveal villous atrophy and infiltration by lymphocytes, eosinophils, and mast cells.
• Nonceliac food-induced enteropathy
• • The results of both IgE-specific tests (ie, prick, RAST) are usually normal.
  • The findings of the jejunal biopsy are similar to those in celiac disease but usually are less pronounced. A varying degree of villous atrophy is present, with crypt hyperplasia and lymphocytic infiltration of the lamina propria. Often, the lesions have a patchy distribution, observed especially in the last few years. Several studies have detected increased numbers of IgE plasmocytes in biopsy specimens of patients with cow's milk protein intolerance.
• Food-induced proctitis
• • Fecal leukocytes are usually positive for neutrophils.
  • Eosinophils can be absent.
  • For colonoscopic findings, see Procedures.

Other Tests

• Skin test responses to cow's milk or other food proteins and detection of food-specific IgE antibodies are usually positive in children with IgE-mediated food allergy. However, most of the food protein intolerances are not IgE-mediated. A double-blind placebo-controlled oral food challenge is the ideal method for definitely confirming histories of adverse reactions to food proteins. However, this approach is rarely used in clinical practice. In addition, even double-blind placebo-controlled challenges can have pitfalls.
• Skin testing with food extracts is often used to screen patients with suspected IgE-mediated food allergies.
• • Skin testing is usually completed by the prick technique, which is a reliable means of detecting IgE antibodies to food in children.
  • A positive skin test result merely implies the presence of food-specific IgE antibodies. A negative skin test result has a high predictive accuracy (estimated to be >95%).
  • Unfortunately, a positive prick test result is a poor predictor of clinical symptoms during food challenges. The positive predictive accuracy widely varies but has been estimated to be lower than 50%. In children younger than 2 years, the negative predictive accuracy of the skin test result is not as good as in older children, but, on the other hand, a positive test result is more likely to be significant. Composition and quality of the extracts are also a significant consideration. Sometimes, testing a drop of the milk that is used to feed the child (eg, formula milk, soy milk, others) is preferable.
• A position statement issued by the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology considered cytotoxic testing, provocative subcutaneous testing, and provocative sublingual tests to be of unproven value.
• Elimination diets involve the following:
• • The simplest type of elimination diet is elimination of suspected food antigens from the diet for 2-4 weeks or longer.
  • When no specific allergens can be incriminated, the common food allergens are eliminated from the diet.
  • In severe and unresponsive cases, consider the use of an elemental diet.
• Food challenge tests involve the following:
• • An elimination diet for 10-14 days should precede a food challenge test.
  • Perform a food challenge under medical supervision. A history of food-related anaphylaxis is a relative contraindication to food challenge.
  • An open food challenge (both the physician and the patient are aware of the food) can be accepted when the resulting symptoms can be objectively observed. Use a double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (both the physician and the patient are unaware of the food) if the resulting symptoms are only subjective.
  • The oral food challenge has been established as the criterion standard for the diagnosis of adverse food reactions caused by any mechanism. The test is diagnostic of food intolerance when symptoms subside following dietary elimination of the offending food or when symptoms recur within 48 hours after milk provocation. Reactions must be reproducible with repeated elimination/challenge tests. Delayed-onset reactions, a common cause of GI reactions, cause symptoms hours or days after the ingestion, with a timing pattern. In cow's milk protein intolerance, the same original clinical picture tends to recur after the challenge.
  • Very delayed clinical reactions to food challenge including constipation, wheezing, dermatitis plus constipation, and dermatitis alone have been reported in a small subgroup of patients. The mean time between the challenge and the onset of a clinical symptom was 13.3 days (range, 4-26 d).

Procedures

• Upper and lower GI endoscopies: Usually, the clinical picture and the history are clear, and the recommended diagnostic process (see Lab Studies above) does not require performance of endoscopic procedures. However, endoscopy may be part of the differential diagnostic workup in cases in which clinical doubt is acknowledged.
• • Upper endoscopy
  • • In cases with eosinophilic esophagitis, various degrees of hyperemia are macroscopically observed. In addition, furrowing of the mucosa, rings, and plaques have been described. Microscopically, eosinophils are observed infiltrating the esophageal wall. Although no pathognomonic histologic characteristics are associated with eosinophilic esophagitis, an eosinophilic count of more than 20 cells per high-power field is considered diagnostic of this recently described entity. Patchy lymphonodular hyperplasia of the GI tract, at any site from the duodenum to the colon, has been suggested to be related to food allergy.
    • In patients presenting with signs or symptoms of enteropathy, an upper endoscopy with duodenal biopsies may be indicated in the diagnostic workup. The microscopic picture of enteropathy can totally overlap with that of celiac disease (ie, partial to total villous atrophy, crypt hyperplasia), possibly with a more common occurrence of a patchy lesion rather than continuous lesion.
  • Lower GI endoscopy (colonoscopy): This procedure is completed in the presence of signs or symptoms of colitis or proctitis (mainly lower GI bleeding) and whenever the diagnosis of food-induced colitis is not obvious. In food-induced colitis, the procedure macroscopically reveals linear erosions and mucosal edema. Bowel lesions are generally confined to the distal large bowel. Microscopically, focal erythema and frequent nodularity with superficial erosions are observed. Eosinophilic infiltration, most prominent in the lamina propria, can be observed in the biopsy specimens but is by no means a constant finding.
• Biopsy
• • In allergic eosinophilic esophagitis, esophageal biopsy reveals infiltration of the mucosa and submucosa with eosinophils.
  • In allergic eosinophilic gastritis, gastric biopsy reveals marked infiltration of the mucosa and submucosa with eosinophils (especially in the gastric antrum).
  • In allergic eosinophilic gastroenteritis, diagnosis requires a biopsy specimen that reveals an eosinophilic infiltration of the mucosa and submucosa. Unfortunately, no standards for making the histologic diagnosis are available. In infants and children without GI symptoms, eosinophilic counts in the gastric fundus and antrum are consistently low, but in the terminal ileum, cecum, and proximal colon, eosinophil counts as high as 30 per high-power field can be detected.
  • In enterocolitis syndrome, the jejunal biopsy reveals villous atrophy and infiltration by lymphocytes, eosinophils, and mast cells.
  • In nonceliac food-induced enteropathy, the findings of the jejunal biopsy are similar to those in celiac disease but usually are less pronounced. A varying degree of villous atrophy is present with crypt hyperplasia and lymphocytic infiltration of the lamina propria. Often, the lesions have a patchy distribution, observed especially in the last few years. Several studies have detected increased numbers of IgE plasmocytes in biopsy specimens of patients with cow's milk protein intolerance.

Histologic Findings

See Procedures.

TREATMENT

Section 6 of 10  

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction
• Clinical
• Differentials
• Workup
• Treatment
• Medication
• Follow-up
• Miscellaneous
• References

Medical Care

The definitive treatment of food allergy is strict elimination of the offending food from the diet.

• Breastfeeding is the first choice in infants without lactose intolerance. The mother should eliminate cow's milk (and eventually eggs and fish or other implicated foods) from her diet.
• As many as 50% of children affected by cow's milk protein intolerance develop soy protein intolerance if they are fed with soy-based formulas. Therefore, soy-based formulas should not be used for the treatment of cow's milk protein intolerance. Use complete milk protein hydrolysates in infants who cannot be breastfed. Partially hydrolyzed formulas are absolutely not indicated in children with cow's milk protein intolerance. Occasionally, children may develop intolerance toward complete hydrolysated formulas. In these cases, use amino acid–based formulas, which are now widely available and are balanced in trace elements and vitamins.
• Eosinophilic gastroenteritis can show clinical and histologic improvement after oral corticosteroid therapy. Topical steroids, administered as inhaled corticosteroids, have also shown beneficial effect.

MEDICATION

Section 7 of 10  

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction
• Clinical
• Differentials
• Workup
• Treatment
• Medication
• Follow-up
• Miscellaneous
• References

Topical or orally and intranasally inhaled corticosteroids are used to treat dermatologic or respiratory symptoms associated with protein intolerance.

Drug Category: Corticosteroids

These agents have anti-inflammatory properties and cause profound and varied metabolic effects. They modify the body's immune response to diverse stimuli.

FOLLOW-UP

Section 8 of 10  

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction
• Clinical
• Differentials
• Workup
• Treatment
• Medication
• Follow-up
• Miscellaneous
• References

Deterrence/Prevention

• Infants with elevated cord serum IgE and a positive family history of atopy are at risk for the development of atopic disease.
• In some infants at high risk, exclusive breastfeeding with delayed introduction of solid foods until the infant is aged 6 months may delay or possibly prevent the onset of food allergy.
• Because small amounts of food antigens ingested by the mother are excreted in breast milk, avoidance of allergenic foods by lactating mothers can be recommended.
• Two systematic reviews in Cochrane Database did not find any evidence to support feeding infants with hydrolysed formula or soy protein formula for the prevention of allergy or protein intolerance.^{6, 7}
• The intestinal microflora interacts with the mucosal immune system, and, in germ-free mice, does not develop a normal oral tolerance. The intestinal flora of children with atopy has been found to differ from that of controls. These observations suggest that the normal flora can play a role in the prevention of food allergies.
• A potential role for probiotics can be hypothesized. Data are accumulating that are extremely encouraging in this area, even if conflictual results are still reported. Administration of Lactobacillus rhamnosus to pregnant and lactating mothers and their offspring for the first few months of life seems to be safe and was shown to be effective in preventing the development of eczema in 50% of children at high risk for food allergy throughout the first 7 years of life.⁸

Prognosis

• Food-induced intolerance is most often a temporary disease. Most children can resume consumption of the offending antigen after 1-4 years of elimination diet.
• Thirty-nine infants with proven cow’s milk protein intolerance from a cohort of 1,749 newborns from the municipality of Odense in Denmark had a good overall prognosis, with a total recovery of 56% at age 1 year, 77% at age 2 years, 87% at age 3 years, 92% at ages 5 and 10 years, and 97% at age 15 years.¹ In children younger than 10 years, 41% developed asthma, and 31% developed rhinoconjunctivitis.
• In food-induced proctocolitis, symptoms generally clear within several days. However, complete resolution of occult bleeding may take as long as 6 weeks.
• Infants with IgE-mediated cow’s milk proteins allergy have a higher risk for development of allergy against environmental inhalant allergens.

MISCELLANEOUS

Section 9 of 10  

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction
• Clinical
• Differentials
• Workup
• Treatment
• Medication
• Follow-up
• Miscellaneous
• References

Medical/Legal Pitfalls

• Failure to make the diagnosis
• Use of inappropriate formulas, which might lead to worsening of symptoms

REFERENCES

Section 10 of 10

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction
• Clinical
• Differentials
• Workup
• Treatment
• Medication
• Follow-up
• Miscellaneous
• References

1. Host A, Halken S, Jacobsen HP, et al. Clinical course of cow's milk protein allergy/intolerance and atopic diseases in childhood. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2002;13 Suppl 15:23-8. [Medline].
2. Walker WA. Cow's milk protein-sensitive enteropathy at school age: a new entity or a spectrum of mucosal immune responses with age. J Pediatr. Dec 2001;139(6):765-6. [Medline].
3. Iacono G, Cavataio F, Montalto G, et al. Intolerance of cow's milk and chronic constipation in children. N Engl J Med. Oct 15 1998;339(16):1100-4. [Medline].
4. Iacono G, Di Prima L, D'Amico D, et al. The "red umbilicus": a diagnostic sign of cow's milk protein intolerance. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. May 2006;42(5):531-4. [Medline].
5. Foucard T, Malmheden Yman I. A study on severe food reactions in Sweden--is soy protein an underestimated cause of food anaphylaxis?. Allergy. Mar 1999;54(3):261-5. [Medline].
6. Osborn DA, Sinn J. Soy formula for prevention of allergy and food intolerance in infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(4):CD003741. [Medline].
7. Osborn DA, Sinn J. Formulas containing hydrolysed protein for prevention of allergy and food intolerance in infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(4):CD003664. [Medline].
8. Kalliomaki M, Salminen S, Poussa T, Isolauri E. Probiotics during the first 7 years of life: a cumulative risk reduction of eczema in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. Apr 2007;119(4):1019-21. [Medline].
9. Axelsson I, Jakobsson I, Lindberg T, Benediktsson B. Bovine beta-lactoglobulin in the human milk. A longitudinal study during the whole lactation period. Acta Paediatr Scand. Sep 1986;75(5):702-7. [Medline].
10. Blackshaw AJ, Levison DA. Eosinophilic infiltrates of the gastrointestinal tract. J Clin Pathol. Jan 1986;39(1):1-7. [Medline].
11. Bock SA. Evaluation of IgE-mediated food hypersensitivities. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000;30 Suppl:S20-7. [Medline].
12. Carroccio A, Montalto G, Custro N, et al. Evidence of very delayed clinical reactions to cow's milk in cow's milk-intolerant patients. Allergy. Jun 2000;55(6):574-9. [Medline].
13. Dupont C, Heyman M. Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome: laboratory perspectives. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000;30 Suppl:S50-7. [Medline].
14. Hill DJ, Heine RG, Cameron DJ. The natural history of intolerance to soy and extensively hydrolyzed formula in infants with multiple food protein intolerance. J Pediatr. Jul 1999;135(1):118-21. [Medline].
15. Kelly KJ. Eosinophilic gastroenteritis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000;30 Suppl:S28-35. [Medline].
16. Kelly KJ, Lazenby AJ, Rowe PC. Eosinophilic esophagitis attributed to gastroesophageal reflux: improvement with an amino acid-based formula. Gastroenterology. Nov 1995;109(5):1503-12. [Medline].
17. Kokkonen J, Haapalahti M, Laurila K, Karttunen TJ, Maki M. Cow's milk protein-sensitive enteropathy at school age. J Pediatr. Dec 2001;139(6):797-803. [Medline].
18. Kokkonen J, Karttunen TJ, Niinimaki A. Lymphonodular hyperplasia as a sign of food allergy in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. Jul 1999;29(1):57-62. [Medline].
19. Kukkonen K, Savilahti E, Haahtela T, et al. Probiotics and prebiotic galacto-oligosaccharides in the prevention of allergic diseases: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. Jan 2007;119(1):192-8. [Medline].
20. Lake AM. Food-induced eosinophilic proctocolitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000;30 Suppl:S58-60. [Medline].
21. Lake AM, Whitington PF, Hamilton SR. Dietary protein-induced colitis in breast-fed infants. J Pediatr. Dec 1982;101(6):906-10. [Medline].
22. Leung AK. Food allergy: a clinical approach. Adv Pediatr. 1998;45:145-77. [Medline].
23. Liacouras CA, Ruchelli E. Eosinophilic esophagitis. Curr Opin Pediatr. Oct 2004;16(5):560-6. [Medline].
24. Lindberg T. Infantile colic: aetiology and prognosis. Acta Paediatr. Jan 2000;89(1):1-2. [Medline].
25. Lowichik A, Weinberg AG. A quantitative evaluation of mucosal eosinophils in the pediatric gastrointestinal tract. Mod Pathol. Feb 1996;9(2):110-4. [Medline].
26. Lowichik A, Weinberg AG. A quantitative evaluation of mucosal eosinophils in the pediatric gastrointestinal tract. Mod Pathol. Feb 1996;9(2):110-4. [Medline].
27. Niggemann B, Beyer K. Pitfalls in double-blind, placebo-controlled oral food challenges. Allergy. Jul 2007;62(7):729-32. [Medline].
28. Novembre E, Vierucci A. Milk allergy/intolerance and atopic dermatitis in infancy and childhood. Allergy. 2001;56 Suppl 67:105-8. [Medline].
29. Sampson HA, Anderson JA. Summary and recommendations: Classification of gastrointestinal manifestations due to immunologic reactions to foods in infants and young children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000;30 Suppl:S87-94. [Medline].
30. Sicherer SH. Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome: clinical perspectives. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000;30 Suppl:S45-9. [Medline].
31. Szajewska H, Setty M, Mrukowicz J, Guandalini S. Probiotics in gastrointestinal diseases in children: hard and not-so-hard evidence of efficacy. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. May 2006;42(5):454-75. [Medline].
32. Taylor AL, Dunstan JA, Prescott SL. Probiotic supplementation for the first 6 months of life fails to reduce the risk of atopic dermatitis and increases the risk of allergen sensitization in high-risk children: a randomized controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. Jan 2007;119(1):184-91. [Medline].
33. Tlaskalova-Hogenova H, Tuckova L, Lodinova-Zadnikova R, et al. Mucosal immunity: its role in defense and allergy. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. Jun 2002;128(2):77-89. [Medline].

Article Last Updated: Jan 17, 2008