Continually Updated Clinical Reference
 
 
  All Sources     eMedicine     Medscape     Drug Reference     MEDLINE
 
eMedicine - Diskitis : Article by

Quick Find
Authors & Editors
Introduction
Clinical
Differentials
Workup
Treatment
Medication
Follow-up
Miscellaneous
Multimedia
References

Related Articles
Osteomyelitis

Rheumatoid Spondylitis

Spinal Tumors




Patient Education
Click here for patient education.



Author: George Jallo, MD, Associate Professor of Neurosurgery, Pediatrics and Oncology, Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

George Jallo is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Neurological Surgeons

Coauthor(s): Alvin Marcovici, MD, Consulting Staff, Southcoast Neurosurgery

Editors: K Daniel Riew, MD, Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine; Chief, Cervical Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Barnes-Jewish Hospital; Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine; William O Shaffer, MD, Associate Professor & Residency Program Director, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Kentucky at Lexington; Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS, Associate Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School; Chief of Arthroscopic Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital; Mary Ann E Keenan, MD, Professor, Vice Chair for Graduate Medical Education, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine; Chief of Neuro-Orthopedics Program, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

Author and Editor Disclosure

Synonyms and related keywords: spondylodiscitis, discitis

Background

Diskitis is an inflammation of the vertebral disk space often related to infection. Infection of the disk space must be considered with vertebral osteomyelitis, as these conditions are almost always present together and share much of the same pathophysiology, symptoms, and treatment. Although diskitis and associated vertebral osteomyelitis are uncommon conditions, they are often the causes of debilitating neurologic injury. Unfortunately, morbidity can be exacerbated by a delay in diagnosis and treatment of this condition. The lumbar region is most commonly affected, followed by the cervical spine and, lastly, the thoracic spine.

Pathophysiology

An infection does not ordinarily originate in the vertebra or disk space, but rather, it spreads there from other sites via the bloodstream. Spinal arteries form 2 lateral anastomotic chains and 1 median anastomotic chain along the posterior surface of the vertebral bodies. The spinal arteries are the origins of the periosteal arteries, which in turn give rise to metaphyseal arteries. In the child, anastomoses between metaphyseal arteries are made by the intermetaphyseal arteries; however, in the adult, these intermetaphyseal arteries degenerate, causing direct diffusion from the adjacent endplate to be the only source of nutrients for the disk. Septic emboli travelling through this arterial system enter the metaphyseal arteries, which have become end arteries in the adult, causing a large area of infarction. Infarction of the vertebral endplates is followed by localized infection that subsequently spreads through the vertebral body and into the poorly vascularized disk space. Infection can then spreadto

the epidural space or paraspinal soft tissues.

The other anastomotic vascular system of the spine is the venous system. The venous system of the spine, like the arterial system, also forms an anastomotic plexus (ie, Batson plexus) in the epidural space. This plexus drains each segmental level and is continuous with the pelvic veins. Retrograde flow through this plexus during periods of high intra-abdominal pressure has been postulated to allow the spread of infection from the pelvic organs. Support for this hypothesis comes from the observation that pelvic disease is one of the most common primary sites of infection in patients with diskitis. Other authors take issue with this hypothesis, citing animal studies that show retrograde flow through the epidural venous plexus only at extremely high intra-abdominal pressures that are not physiologic.

Frequency

United States

Incidence ranges from 1 in 100,000 population to 1 in 250,000 population.

International

In other developed nations, the incidence of diskitis is similar to that in the United States; however, in less developed nations, infectious diskitis is much more common. In some areas of Africa, it has been reported that 11% of all patients seen for back pain were diagnosed with diskitis.

Mortality/Morbidity

Mortality associated with diskitis occurs from the spread of infection, either through the nervous system or through other organs. Mortality has been reported to be 2-12%.

Race

No specific racial predilection has been noted.

Sex

The predominance of diskitis in males is more pronounced in adults, with male-to-female ratios ranging from 2:1 to as high as 5:1. Childhood diskitis has a slight male prevalence, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.4:1.

Age

A bimodal distribution of ages occurs with diskitis. Childhood diskitis affects patients with a mean age of 7 years. The incidence of diskitis then decreases until middle age, when a second peak in incidence is observed at approximately 50 years of age. Some authors argue that childhood diskitis is a separate disease entity and should be considered independently.



History

  • Unfortunately, adult diskitis has a slow, insidious onset, which can cause diagnosis to be delayed for months. Neck or back pain with localized tenderness is the initial presenting complaint. Movement exacerbates these symptoms, which are not alleviated with conservative treatment (eg, analgesics, bed rest).
    • In patients who are chronically ill, a high incidence of epidural extension of the infection exists, causing lower extremity weakness or plegia. Fever, chills, weight loss, and symptoms of systemic disease may be present but are not common.
    • In postoperative patients, symptoms usually begin days to weeks after surgery. Symptoms are similar to those experienced by patients with spontaneous diskitis, which consists of pain without neurologic abnormality. Limited movement and localized tenderness also occur; however, superficial signs of infection are rare (only 10% of cases). Diagnosis is rarely delayed in postoperative patients, which is the main reason that neurologic deficit is uncommon in these cases.
  • The disease has a more acute course in children. A sudden onset of back pain, refusal to walk, and irritability are the most common symptoms. Fever is often present, accompanied by local tenderness and limited back motion.

Physical

Localized tenderness over the involved area with concomitant paraspinal muscle spasm is the most common physical sign. If the cervical or lumbar segments are involved, restricted mobility secondary to pain occurs. Reported rates of neurologic deficit (eg, radiculopathy, myelopathy) vary widely from 2% to 70%. Cervical disease is associated with a much higher rate of neurologic deficit.

Causes

  • Diskitis is thought to spread to the involved intervertebral disk via hematogenous spread of a systemic infection (eg, urinary tract infection [UTI]). Many sites of origin have been implicated, but UTI, pneumonia, and soft-tissue infection seem to be the most common. Direct trauma has not been conclusively shown to be related to diskitis. Intravenous drug use with contaminated syringes offers direct access to the bloodstream for a variety of organisms. Often, no other site of infection is discovered.
  • Staphylococcus aureus is the organism most commonly found; however, Escherichia coli and Proteus species are more common in patients with UTIs. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella species are other gram-negative organisms observed in intravenous drug abusers, although they are not seen as commonly as S aureus. Not surprisingly, medical conditions that predispose patients to infections elsewhere in the body are associated with diskitis. Diabetes, AIDS, steroid use, cancer, and chronic renal insufficiency are common comorbidities.
  • Although rare, infection of the disk space can also occur following surgical intervention at the site. The rate of infection following anterior cervical diskectomy has been quoted at 0.5% of cases. The rate of infection for lumbar diskectomy is half of that. In such cases, infection is transmitted through direct inoculation of the operative site. As in spontaneous diskitis, the most common organism is S aureus, but Staphylococcus epidermidis and Streptococcus species also should be considered.
  • Childhood diskitis has not been consistently associated with an initial causative infection elsewhere in the body. S aureus is the most common organism found.



Osteomyelitis
Rheumatoid Spondylitis
Spinal Tumors

Other Problems to be Considered

Spinal epidural abscess
Pyelonephritis
Rheumatoid arthritis



Lab Studies

  • Hematology
    • Elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are the most consistent laboratory abnormalities seen in cases of diskitis.
    • The mean ESR for patients with diskitis is 85-95 mm per hour. ESR utility can be extended by serial measurements during treatment.
    • A 50% decline in ESR can usually be expected with successful treatment, and ESR often continues to decline after treatment.
    • Frequently, ESR may not return to normal levels despite adequate therapy.
  • Leukocytosis is often present in systemic disease but is frequently absent in diskitis cases. Diskitis is generally accompanied by a normal peripheral white blood cell (WBC) count if the primary site of infection has been treated.
  • Microbiology
    • Blood cultures must be obtained on a frequent basis for any patient suspected of harboring an infected disk.
    • Appropriate therapy may be instituted for positive blood cultures without the need for invasive tests.
    • Unfortunately, blood cultures are positive in only one third to one half of diskitis cases.
  • Sputum and urine cultures are necessary to locate any other sources of infection, including respiratory and genitourinary sites.

Imaging Studies

  • Plain radiography
    • Although radiographic films of the spine can be very useful in diagnosing diskitis, abnormalities are visible only after several weeks following the onset of disease.
    • The most common early finding on plain films is disk-space narrowing, followed by irregularities and erosion of the adjacent endplates and calcification of the anulus around the affected disk.
    • As osteomyelitis progresses, bone density decreases, with loss of the normal trabeculation of the vertebra. If bone destruction continues, subluxation (with possible instability of the spine) becomes evident.
  • Nuclear medicine
    • Gallium-67 and technetium-99m have been utilized in the detection of diskitis with similar results. Radionuclide scanning has demonstrated a high degree of sensitivity shortly after the onset of symptoms. Diffuse initial uptake is followed by more focal uptake on delayed scans. Technetium-99m has been recommended more often because of its lower cost and smaller radiation dose.
    • Because of the availability and sensitivity of other tests, radionuclide scans may be most useful in the workup of patients with fever of unknown origin.
    • Indium-111 WBC scintigraphy has been shown to have a low sensitivity for diskitis and is not the test of choice.
  • CT scan
    • CT scanning has the ability to detect diskitis earlier than plain radiographs.
    • Findings include hypodensity of the intervertebral disk and destruction of the adjacent endplate and bone (see Image 1), with edematous surrounding tissues.
    • Organisms at the affected site can also produce a gas that is easily detected on CT scans.
    • The advantage of CT scans over radiographs is that associated paraspinal disease can also be detected, especially when combined with intravenous contrast or myelography.
    • Use of CT scanning can supplement magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as it is better at distinguishing between bone and soft tissue than MRI.
    • CT can help monitor successful treatment, which is accompanied by increased bone density and sclerosis.
  • MRI
    • The most sensitive and specific test for diskitis is MRI. T1-weighted images (see Image 2) show narrowing of the disk space and low signals consistent with edema in the marrow of adjacent vertebral bodies. T2-weighted images show increased signals in both the disk space and the surrounding vertebral bodies.
    • MRI is very useful in helping distinguish between infectious diskitis, neoplasia, and tuberculosis.
    • Disk space involvement directs attention to infection, as it only is involved late in tuberculosis and very rarely in neoplasia.
    • With the use of intravenous contrast (see Image 3), MRI, like CT, can detect paraspinal disease (eg, paraspinal phlegmon, epidural abscess).
    • A large amount of paraspinal soft-tissue swelling and a psoas abscess are often associated with spinal tuberculosis.
  • Bone scans are not specific for infection over inflammation; therefore, they are ineffective in postoperative patients.

Other Tests

  • Echocardiography can detect bacterial endocarditis, which is a common source of diskitis and embolic infection throughout the body.

Procedures

  • Needle biopsy
    • Needle or trocar placement into the infected area is a minimally invasive test used to obtain histologic confirmation of the disease and tissue samples for culture.
    • Yield and safety of the procedure are maximized by the use of CT scanning for guidance (see Image 4).
    • As in blood cultures, positive tissue cultures occur in only half of biopsies, especially if antibiotic therapy has already been initiated. In such cases, needle biopsy can be repeated or the patient can be referred for open surgical biopsy.
  • Surgical biopsy
    • Open biopsy has been found in some studies to have the highest yield in terms of positive cultures and diagnosis confirmation.
    • Open biopsy is the most invasive test.
    • While some surgeons prefer to combine open biopsy with surgical debridement, no difference has been found between antibiotics and debridement when compared with antibiotics alone in cases of early diskitis.

Histologic Findings

The histologic findings of diskitis are similar to those of any bacterial pyogenic infection. Local destruction of the disk and endplates occurs with infiltration of neutrophils in the early stages. Later, a lymphocytic infiltrate predominates.



Medical Care

  • Antibiotic treatment must be tailored to the isolated organism and any other sites of infection.
    • Broad-spectrum antibiotics must be used if no organism is isolated; however, this is very rare, and other disease processes (eg, spinal tuberculosis) must be considered in the face of persistently negative cultures.
    • Parenteral treatment is usually administered for 6-8 weeks. Before parenteral therapy is discontinued, the ESR should have dropped by one half to one third, the patient should have no pain on ambulation, and there should be no neurologic deficits.
    • The use of oral antibiotics following intravenous treatment has not been shown to be of added benefit.
    • Any laboratory or clinical sign of persistent infection should prompt another biopsy and continued antibiotic therapy.
  • Immobilization is necessary, especially in the initial stages of the disease.
    • Two weeks of bed rest should be followed by external immobilization with a brace when the patient gets out of bed.
    • Any pain on ambulation is an indication for continued bed rest.
    • The goal of immobilization is to provide the opportunity for the affected vertebrae to fuse in an anatomically aligned position.
    • Generally, bracing is used for 3-6 months following initiation of treatment; however, even with the use of appropriate antibiotics and bracing, collapse of the vertebral segments and kyphos formation may occur.
  • Pain control is an important adjunct to antibiotics and immobilization.

Surgical Care

Indications for surgery beyond open biopsy include neurologic deficit, spinal deformity, disease progression, noncompliance, and antibiotic toxicity. The goal of surgery is to remove diseased tissue, decompress neural structures, and ensure spinal stability. Although in most cases the vertebrae fuse spontaneously following diskitis and osteomyelitis, operative fusion can be a useful adjunct by allowing earlier mobilization of the patient. Despite early concerns, use of a fusion plug and metallic instrumentation in an infected field has not been shown to impede successful treatment.

Consultations

  • Infectious disease
  • Neurosurgery
  • Orthopedic spine surgery

Diet

No particular diet has been shown to have a clinical benefit in patients with diskitis.

Activity

Many authors believe that 2 weeks of bed rest with initial treatment helps prevent the development of a kyphotic deformity. Use of an orthotic brace to help stabilize the spine while spontaneous fusion takes place is recommended for 3-6 months. Ambulation is recommended only if the patient has neither pain nor radiographic signs of instability.



Parenteral narrow-spectrum antibiotics should be prescribed according to the organism isolated. If cultures are consistently negative, administer broad-spectrum antibiotics for several weeks.

Drug Category: Antibiotics

Empiric antimicrobial therapy must be comprehensive and should cover all likely pathogens in the context of the clinical setting.

Drug NameVancomycin (Lyphocin, Vancocin, Vancoled)
DescriptionPotent antibiotic that is directed against gram-positive organisms and is active against Enterococcus species. Useful in the treatment of septicemia and skin structure infections. Indicated for patients who cannot receive or have failed to respond to penicillins or cephalosporins or who have infections with resistant staphylococci. For abdominal penetrating injuries, it is combined with an agent active against enteric flora and/or anaerobes.
To avoid toxicity, the current recommendation is to assay vancomycin trough levels after the third dose is drawn and a half an hour prior to the next dose. Use CrCl to adjust the dosage in patients diagnosed with renal impairment.
Used in conjunction with gentamicin for prophylaxis in patients who are allergic to penicillin and are undergoing gastrointestinal or genitourinary procedures.
Adult Dose500 mg/d to 2 g/d IV divided tid/qid for 7-10 d
Pediatric Dose40 mg/kg/d IV divided tid/qid for 7-10 d
ContraindicationsDocumented hypersensitivity
InteractionsErythema, histaminelike flushing, and anaphylactic reactions may occur when administered with anesthetic agents; taken concurrently with aminoglycosides, the risk of nephrotoxicity may increase above that with aminoglycoside monotherapy; effects in neuromuscular blockade may be enhanced when coadministered with nondepolarizing muscle relaxants
PregnancyC - Safety for use during pregnancy has not been established.
PrecautionsCaution in renal failure and neutropenia; red man syndrome, which is caused by too rapid IV infusion (dose given over a few minutes), but it rarely occurs when dose is given over 2 h IV administration or given as PO or IP administration; red man syndrome is not an allergic reaction

Drug NameGentamicin (Garamycin, Gentacidin)
DescriptionAminoglycoside antibiotic for gram-negative coverage. Used in combination with both an agent against gram-positive organisms and one that covers anaerobes. Not the drug of choice (DOC). Consider if penicillins or other less toxic drugs are contraindicated, in mixed infections caused by susceptible staphylococci and gram-negative organisms, or when clinically indicated.
Dosing regimens are numerous; adjust dose based on CrCl and changes in volume of distribution. May be given IV/IM.
Adult DoseSerious infections and normal renal function: 3 mg/kg/dose IV q8h
Loading dose and maintenance dose: 1.0-2.5 mg/kg IV and 1.0-1.5 mg/kg IV, respectively, q8h
Extended dosing regimen for life-threatening infections: 5 mg/kg/d IV/IM q6-8h
Follow each regimen by at least a trough level drawn on the third or fourth dose (0.5 h before dosing); may draw a peak level 0.5 h after 30-min infusion
Pediatric Dose<5 years: 2.5 mg/kg/dose IV/IM q8h
>5 years: 1.5-2.5 mg/kg/dose IV/IM q8h or 6.0-7.5 mg/kg/d divided q8h; not to exceed 300 mg/d; monitor as in adults
ContraindicationsDocumented hypersensitivity; non–dialysis-dependent renal insufficiency
InteractionsCoadministration with other aminoglycosides, cephalosporins, penicillins, and amphotericin B may increase nephrotoxicity; because aminoglycosides enhance effects of neuromuscular blocking agents, prolonged respiratory depression may occur; coadministration with loop diuretics may increase ototoxicity of aminoglycosides; possible irreversible hearing loss of varying degrees may occur (monitor regularly)
PregnancyD - Unsafe in pregnancy
PrecautionsNarrow therapeutic index (not intended for long-term therapy); caution in patients who have renal failure and are not on dialysis, myasthenia gravis, hypocalcemia, and conditions that depress neuromuscular transmission; adjust dose in renal impairment

Drug NameNafcillin (Unipen, Nallpen, Nafcil)
DescriptionInitial therapy for suspected penicillin-G–resistant streptococcal or staphylococcal infections. Use parenteral therapy initially for severe infections. Change to oral therapy as condition warrants.
Due to thrombophlebitis, particularly in the elderly, administer parenterally only for short term (1-2 d); change to oral route as clinically indicated.
Adult Dose250 mg to 1 g PO q4-6h
Alternatively, 500 mg to 1 g IV/IM q4-6h
Pediatric Dose0-4 kg (neonates): 10 mg/kg IM bid
4-40 kg: 25 mg/kg IM bid or 50 mg/kg/d PO divided qid
Alternatively, 100-200 mg/kg/d IV/IM in 4-6 divided doses
ContraindicationsDocumented hypersensitivity
InteractionsAssociated with warfarin resistance when administered concurrently; effects may decrease with bacteriostatic action of tetracycline derivatives
PregnancyB - Usually safe but benefits must outweigh the risks.
PrecautionsTo optimize therapy, determine causative organisms and susceptibility; administer treatment for at least 10 days to eliminate infection and prevent sequelae (eg, endocarditis, rheumatic fever); take cultures after treatment to confirm that infection is eradicated

Drug NameCeftazidime (Tazidime, Tazicef, Ceptaz, Fortaz)
DescriptionThird-generation cephalosporin with broad-spectrum, gram-negative activity; lower efficacy against gram-positive organisms; higher efficacy against resistant organisms. Arrests bacterial growth by binding to one or more penicillin-binding proteins.
Adult Dose250-500 mg to 2 g IV/IM q8-12h
Pediatric DoseNeonates: 30 mg/kg IV q12h
Infants and children: 30-50 mg/kg/dose IV q8h; not to exceed 6 g/d
Adolescents: Administer as in adults
ContraindicationsDocumented hypersensitivity
InteractionsNephrotoxicity may increase with aminoglycosides, furosemide, and ethacrynic acid; probenecid may increase ceftazidime levels
PregnancyB - Usually safe but benefits must outweigh the risks.
PrecautionsAdjust dose in severe renal insufficiency (high doses may cause CNS toxicity); superinfections and promotion of nonsusceptible organisms may occur with prolonged use or repeated therapy



Further Inpatient Care

  • Once the correct treatment is implemented, monitor patients to rule out progressive neurologic deficit.

Further Outpatient Care

  • Laboratory analysis
    • A falling ESR is consistent with successful treatment.
    • Although ESR values should fall by at least one third to one half, rarely do they return to preinfection levels.
    • Reduction of CRP levels has been shown to be more sensitive in some studies than ESR.
  • Radiography
    • Serial radiographic examination is a necessity to detect bony collapse or deformity.
    • Successful treatment is accompanied by appropriate changes, including sclerosis of the endplates, on plain films and CT scans.
    • Nevertheless, radiographic findings are significantly slower than clinical response and cannot be used to assess eradication of infection.

In/Out Patient Meds

  • Parenteral antibiotics are a requirement, even for outpatients.
  • Pain medications can be a useful adjunct, as they allow for increased mobilization.

Transfer

  • Transfer to an institution with neurosurgical or orthopedic spinal care is warranted for any patient demonstrating neurologic decline for decompression and possible stabilization.

Deterrence/Prevention

  • No specific deterrence is available for diskitis except treatment of the underlying disease (eg, diabetes, sepsis).

Complications

  • Neurologic deficits develop in 13-40% of patients, especially those with diabetes or other systemic illnesses.
  • Long-term antibiotic therapy may lead to ototoxicity or renal toxicity.

Prognosis

  • Most patients are cured by a treatment protocol of antibiotics, either alone or in combination with surgery.
  • Only 15% of patients experience permanent neurologic deficits.
  • Recrudescence of infection occurs in 2-8% of patients.

Patient Education

  • The significance of antibiotic regimen compliance is the single most important factor in patient education. Incomplete treatment can lead to resistance with devastating results.
  • The importance of orthotic brace compliance must also be stressed.
  • Educate patients on early neurologic signs, and instruct patients to return for medical attention on detection of the slightest deficit.



Medical/Legal Pitfalls

  • The most significant pitfall associated with diskitis is failure to diagnose an epidural abscess. A significant number of epidural abscess cases go undetected until serious neurologic decline has occurred. Neurologic deficit is sometimes thought to be caused by a vascular ischemic event rather than simple compression. In these cases, the prognosis for complete recovery is unfavorable once a serious deficit has occurred.



Media file 1:  Axial CT scan in a patient with diskitis demonstrates extensive destruction of the vertebral endplate. Note the preservation of the posterior elements, including facet joints, lamina, and spinous process. This is characteristic for pyogenic diskitis and less common in tuberculosis (Pott disease).
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  CT

Media file 2:  Sagittal T1-weighted MRI of the lumbar spine in a 74-year-old man, revealing diskitis of the L4-L5 disk space. Note extensive destruction of the endplates of the adjacent vertebral bodies. No compression of the thecal sac is present, which is an important consideration when contemplating surgical intervention.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  MRI

Media file 3:  Contrast-enhanced sagittal T1-weighted MRI image in a 55-year-old woman shows thoracic diskitis with an associated epidural abscess and spinal cord compression. Because of the significant cord compression, this patient underwent surgical decompression.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  MRI

Media file 4:  Trajectory of a needle in a biopsy of the infected disk space guided by CT scan. Care is taken to avoid the thecal sac and nerve roots.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  CT



  • Bileckot R, Ntsiba H, Okongo D. [Diagnosis of arthritis in black Africa. Apropos of 473 cases in Congo]. Rev Rhum Ed Fr. Apr 1994;61(4):260-5. [Medline].
  • Bontoux D, Codello L, Debiais F. [Infectious spondylodiscitis. Analysis of a series of 105 cases]. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic. Jun 1992;59(6):401-7. [Medline].
  • Borowski AM, Crow WN, Hadjipavlou AG. Interventional radiology case conference: the University of Texas Medical Branch. Percutaneous management of pyogenic spondylodiskitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Jun 1998;170(6):1587-92. [Medline].
  • Bwanahali K, Dikilu K, Kilesi M. [Etiologic aspects of low back pain in rheumatic patients in Kinshasa (Zaire). Apropos of 169 cases]. Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic. Apr 1992;59(4):253-7. [Medline].
  • Conaughty JM, Chen J, Martinez OV, et al. Efficacy of linezolid versus vancomycin in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus discitis: a controlled animal model. Spine. Oct 15 2006;31(22):E830-2. [Medline].
  • Ehara S. Spondylodiskitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. May 1999;172(5):1450-1. [Medline].
  • Fouquet B, Goupille P, Jattiot F. Discitis after lumbar disc surgery. Features of "aseptic" and "septic" forms. Spine. Mar 1992;17(3):356-8. [Medline].
  • Hadjipavlou AG, Cesani-Vazquez F, Villaneuva-Meyer J. The effectiveness of gallium citrate Ga 67 radionuclide imaging in vertebral osteomyelitis revisited. Am J Orthop. Mar 1998;27(3):179-83. [Medline].
  • Hooten WM, Mizerak A, Carns PE, Huntoon MA. Discitis after lumbar epidural corticosteroid injection: a case report and analysis of the case report literature. Pain Med. Jan-Feb 2006;7(1):46-51. [Medline].
  • Hopf C, Meurer A, Eysel P. Operative treatment of spondylodiscitis--what is the most effective approach?. Neurosurg Rev. 1998;21(4):217-25. [Medline].
  • Houten JK, Cooper PR. Pyogenic osteomyelitis of the spine. Contemporary Neurosurgery. 2000;22:6:1-8.
  • Jimenez-Mejias ME, de Dios Colmenero J, Sanchez-Lora FJ. Postoperative spondylodiskitis: etiology, clinical findings, prognosis, and comparison with nonoperative pyogenic spondylodiskitis. Clin Infect Dis. Aug 1999;29(2):339-45. [Medline].
  • Kemp HB, Jackson JW, Jeremiah JD. Pyogenic infections occurring primarily in intervertebral discs. J Bone Joint Surg [Br]. Nov 1973;55(4):698-714. [Medline].
  • Khan IA, Vaccaro AR, Zlotolow DA. Management of vertebral diskitis and osteomyelitis. Orthopedics. Aug 1999;22(8):758-65. [Medline].
  • King HA. Back pain in children. Orthop Clin North Am. Jul 1999;30(3):467-74, ix. [Medline].
  • Kylanpaa-Back ML, Suominen RA, Salo SA. Postoperative discitis: outcome and late magnetic resonance image evaluation of ten patients. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1999;88(1):61-4. [Medline].
  • Maiuri F, Iaconetta G, Gallicchio B. Spondylodiscitis. Clinical and magnetic resonance diagnosis. Spine. Aug 1 1997;22(15):1741-6. [Medline].
  • Maliner LI, Johnson DL. Intervertebral disc space inflammation in children. Childs Nerv Syst. Feb 1997;13(2):101-3; discussion 104. [Medline].
  • McCain GA, Harth M, Bell DA. Septic Discitis. J Rheumatol. Jan-Feb 1981;8(1):100-9. [Medline].
  • Walters R, Rahmat R, Fraser R, Moore R. Preventing and treating discitis: cephazolin penetration in ovine lumbar intervertebral disc. Eur Spine J. Sep 2006;15(9):1397-403. [Medline].

Diskitis excerpt

Article Last Updated: Feb 9, 2007