Continually Updated Clinical Reference
 
 
  All Sources     eMedicine     Medscape     Drug Reference     MEDLINE
 
eMedicine - Coronoid Fracture : Article by

Quick Find
Authors & Editors
Introduction
Indications
RELEVANT ANATOMY
Contraindications
Workup
Treatment
Complications
Outcome And Prognosis
Future And Controversies
References




Patient Education
Click here for patient education.



Author: Nirmal Tejwani, MD, Associate Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Associate Professor, Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Bellevue Hospital and Hospital for Joint Diseases

Nirmal Tejwani is a member of the following medical societies: AO Foundation and Orthopaedic Trauma Association

Coauthor(s): Mihir M Thacker, MBBS, MS(Orth), DNB(Orth), FCPS(Orth), D'Ortho, Assistant Professor of Orthopedic Surgery and Pediatrics, Thomas Jefferson University; Consulting Staff, Department of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Alfred I duPont Hospital for Children; Orthopedic Oncologist, Helen F Graham Cancer Center and Christiana Care Health Services

Editors: Steven I Rabin, MD, Clinical Associate Professor, Loyola University Medical Center; Chair, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Dreyer Medical Clinic; Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine; Robert J Nowinski, DO, Clinical Assistant Professor of Orthopaedic Surgery, Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine; Private Practice, Orthopedic Specialists and Sports Medicine, Newark, Ohio; Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS, Associate Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School; Chief of Arthroscopic Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital; Harris Gellman, MD, Consulting Surgeon, Broward Hand Center, Voluntary Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery and Plastic Surgery, Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine

Author and Editor Disclosure

Synonyms and related keywords: fracture dislocation of the elbow, elbow fracture, broken arm, broken elbow, Monteggia fractures, elbow fracture dislocation, radial head fracture, terrible triad of the elbow

Fractures of the coronoid are often seen as a part of complex elbow fracture dislocations or high Monteggia fractures (rare).

Problem

Fractures of the coronoid rarely occur in isolation. They usually occur in combination with a radial head fracture, a dislocation of the elbow, or both (terrible triad of the elbow). Large coronoid fractures often are associated with persistent elbow instability even after reduction of the dislocation; recently the increasing trend has been toward fixation of these injuries in order to restore stability and initiate an early range of motion program.

Frequency

Coronoid fractures account for less than 1-2% of all elbow fractures. Coronoid fractures have been identified in 10-15% of elbow dislocations (Regan, 1989; Selesnick, 1984) Radial head fractures are seen in about 5-10% of elbow dislocations (Linscheid, 1993). Coronoid fractures, especially with large fragments, are associated with more instability and an increased incidence of complications.

Etiology

Coronoid fractures were believed to result from avulsion of a bony fragment of the coronoid by the brachialis, which inserts onto the coronoid process. This, however, does not explain the mechanism of type 1 and some type 2 fractures as the brachialis attaches to the base of the coronoid process of the ulna. (See Workup, Imaging Studies, below, for a discussion of fracture types.) These fractures probably occur from shear forces at the time of the dislocation when the trochlea pushes off a piece of the coronoid.

Pathophysiology

Morrey and coworkers, in their biomechanical study of the elbow, concluded that approximately 50% of the elbow stability comes from the congruent articulation between the trochlea and the ulna (Morrey, 1998).

Closkey et al studied the stabilizing function of the coronoid process under axial load to the elbow. They found no significant difference, at any flexion position, in posterior axial displacement between the intact elbows and the elbows in which 50% or less of the coronoid process was fractured (types 1 and 2) (P = .43). Differences across all flexion positions were significant in posterior axial displacement between the intact elbows and the elbows in which more than 50% of the coronoid process was fractured (type 3) (P = .006). They concluded that in response to axial load, elbows with a fracture involving more than 50% of the coronoid process displace more readily than elbows with a fracture involving 50% or less of the coronoid process, especially when the elbow is flexed 60° and beyond.

Clinical

Coronoid fractures are usually seen in patients with elbow dislocations. The patient usually presents with a history of a fall on the outstretched hand and a deformity of the elbow.

The presence of an unstable reduction is suggestive of an associated cornoid or radial head fracture. An irreducible dislocation, on the other hand, should arouse suspicion of soft tissue (brachialis, median nerve) or bony (medial epicondyle) interposition in the joint.

Distal vascularity and the neurological status should always be tested in these cases.

In children, coronoid fractures have a bimodal age distribution, with peaks at age 8-9 years and at age 12-14 years (Bracq, 1987). Coronoid fractures in children are often associated with elbow dislocations, olecranon fractures, medial epicondyle fractures, or lateral condyle fractures.

In children younger than 6 years, Blasier has described an unusual flap injury of the unossified coronoid in which the elbow is dislocated and a small flap of the articular surface gets flipped back into the joint. This usually appears as a small flake of bone in the anterior portion of the joint on the lateral radiograph. This flake is a clue to the underlying pathoanatomy and the extent of injury.



A displaced coronoid fracture that presents with a block to elbow motion is a definite indication for surgical stabilization.

Type 3 fractures need to be fixed. If the fragment is too comminuted for internal fixation, then a hinged external fixator should be applied across the elbow and protected range of motion should be started. Type 2 fractures with elbow instability are also best treated with a hinged external fixator.

Type 1 and most type 2 fractures are usually managed nonoperatively.



The coronoid acts as the anterior buttress of the greater sigmoid notch of the ulna. It provides attachment to the anterior band of the medial collateral ligament (MCL) and middle portion of the anterior capsule. The anterior colliculus of the MCL is the primary stabilizer of the elbow against valgus strain in the functional arc of 20-120° of flexion. This ligament is most likely to become injured with a low coronoid fracture with the elbow in full extension. A fracture of the coronoid, therefore, results in the loss of all of these supports. The brachialis muscle is attached to the base of the coronoid process. Dissection of the brachialis during fixation of these fractures contributes to the risk of heterotopic ossification in these cases.



Type 1 and 2 fractures usually do not require operative stabilization. Highly comminuted type 3 fractures pose a significant problem during open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and may be better treated with a hinged external fixator.



Imaging Studies

  • Radiographs of the elbow in the anteroposterior (AP), lateral, and, if required, oblique views should be obtained to clearly ascertain the extent of bony injury. Oblique views are especially important in minimally displaced fractures because in a true lateral view of the elbow, the radial head overlaps the coronoid. In order to avoid this problem Greenspan and Norman described the radiocapitellar view in which the elbow is flexed to 90° and placed flat on the table with the x-ray beam directed obliquely towards the shoulder is used. This separates the radial head from the coronoid. Regan and Morrey have classified coronoid fractures depending on the size of the fragment, as follows:
    • Type 1: Avulsion of the tip of the coronoid process (Linscheid et al do not believe this to be an avulsion, as the brachialis is attached to the base of the coronoid.)
    • Type 2: Single or comminuted fragment involving less than 50% of the coronoid
    • Type 3: Single or comminuted fragment involving more than 50% of the coronoid
  • A CT scan may be useful for complex fracture dislocations to delineate the fracture patterns and for preoperative planning.



Medical therapy

Nonoperative treatment is indicated for type 1 and 2 injuries and includes closed reduction of the dislocation and splinting it in moderate degree of flexion for a short period ( <3 wk) before starting a program of protected mobilization of the elbow.

Surgical therapy

See Indications, above.

Preoperative details

Adequate preoperative imaging studies should be carried out in order to ascertain the exact fracture anatomy. Skin condition must be evaluated because severe soft tissue injury and swelling may be present.

Intraoperative details

The coronoid can be approached posteromedially through a posterior midline incision after lifting the ulnar origin of the extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) subperiosteally.

In cases of a Monteggia fracture-dislocation, the coronoid may be approached through the interval between the ECU and the anconeus laterally and the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) medially. The radial head may be approached between the anconeus medially and the ECU laterally. This will help prevent formation of a synostosis between the radius and the ulna.

After exposing the fracture site and cleaning the edges, the fragment is anatomically reduced and fixed by means of an interfragmentary screw (from posterior to anterior, or from anterior to posterior if the fragment is small or osteoporotic). The fracture may also be stabilized using heavy nonabsorbable sutures.

In patients with highly comminuted coronoid fractures, reconstruction using a piece of the radial head (Esser technique) or a piece of the olecranon (Morimoto technique) has been described.

Postoperative details

The elbow is immobilized at 90° of flexion in a well-padded posterior splint. The neurovascular status of the upper limb is closely monitored for the fist 24 hours. At the earliest sign of neurovascular dysfunction, encircling dressing and bandages should be loosened and compartment pressures should be measured.

Follow-up

The elbow is immobilized for about a week, and then a protected mobilization program in a hinged orthosis, which prevents varus-valgus stresses on the elbow, is initiated. Brace use is continued for approximately 4-6 weeks in order to allow the ligaments to heal.

Prophylaxis against heterotopic ossification is initiated the day after surgery. The authors prefer to use indomethacin (75 mg PO) for 3 weeks following the surgery.



Complications include the following:

  • Neurovascular injury
  • Stiffness
  • Heterotopic ossification
  • Instability and recurrent dislocation
  • Posttraumatic arthritis of the elbow



The prognosis for a complex fracture dislocation of the elbow is definitely poorer than that for a simple elbow dislocation, which has been shown to have good long-term results.

Prognostic factors include the following:

  • Size of the fragment: Type 3 fractures have the worst prognosis, with only 20% having good results in the series presented by Regan et al (1989).
  • The degree of damage to the articular cartilage at the time of injury
  • The extent of the soft tissue injury
  • The stability obtained at the time of reduction
  • The duration of immobilization



In the past, coronoid fractures were treated with a longer period of immobilization (3-4 wk) in greater degrees of flexion, and this was believed to be a better alternative than operative treatment. However, with increasing understanding of the contribution of the coronoid to stability of the elbow, the trend is increasing toward operative stabilization of these injuries and initiation of early protected range of motion in order to avoid the most dreaded complication of these injuries, which is stiffness.



  • Blasier RD. Intra-articular flap fracture of the olecranon in a child. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jul 1989;71(6):945-7. [Medline].
  • Bracq H. Fracture of the coronoid apophysis. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1987;73(6):472-3. [Medline].
  • Broberg MA, Morrey BF. Results of treatment of fracture-dislocations of the elbow. Clin Orthop. Mar 1987;(216):109-19. [Medline].
  • Cage DJ, Abrams RA, Callahan JJ, Botte MJ. Soft tissue attachments of the ulnar coronoid process. An anatomic study with radiographic correlation. Clin Orthop. Nov 1995;(320):154-8. [Medline].
  • Closkey RF, Goode JR, Kirschenbaum D, Cody RP. The role of the coronoid process in elbow stability. A biomechanical analysis of axial loading. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Dec 2000;82-A(12):1749-53. [Medline].
  • Gadgil A, Roach R, Neal N, Maffulli N. Isolated avulsion fracture of the coronoid process requiring open reduction in a paediatric patient: a case report. Acta Orthop Belg. Oct 2002;68(4):396-8. [Medline].
  • Greenspan A, Norman A. Radial head-capitellum view: an expanded imaging approach to elbow injury. Radiology. Jul 1987;164(1):272-4. [Medline].
  • Greenspan A, Norman A, Rosen H. Radial head-capitellum view in elbow trauma: clinical application and radiographic-anatomic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. Aug 1984;143(2):355-9. [Medline].
  • Hanks GA, Kottmeier SA. Isolated fracture of the coronoid process of the ulna: a case report and review of the literature. J Orthop Trauma. 1990;4(2):193-6. [Medline].
  • Josefsson PO, Gentz CF, Johnell O, Wendeberg B. Dislocations of the elbow and intraarticular fractures. Clin Orthop. Sep 1989;(246):126-30. [Medline].
  • Lill H, Korner J, Rose T, et al. Fracture-dislocations of the elbow joint--strategy for treatment and results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2001;121(1-2):31-7. [Medline].
  • Linscheid RL, O'Driscoll SW. Elbow dislocations. In: BF Morrey, ed. The Elbow and Its Disorders. 2nd edEd. 2, pp. 441-452. Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders, 1993. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1993:441-52.
  • Moritomo H, Tada K, Yoshida T, Kawatsu N. Reconstruction of the coronoid for chronic dislocation of the elbow. Use of a graft from the olecranon in two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. May 1998;80(3):490-2. [Medline].
  • Morrey BF. Complex instability of the elbow. Instr Course Lect. 1998;47:157-64. [Medline].
  • Regan W, Morrey B. Fractures of the coronoid process of the ulna. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Oct 1989;71(9):1348-54. [Medline].
  • Ring D, Jupiter JB. Fracture-dislocation of the elbow. Hand Clin. Feb 2002;18(1):55-63. [Medline].
  • Ring D, Jupiter JB, Zilberfarb J. Posterior dislocation of the elbow with fractures of the radial head andcoronoid. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Apr 2002;84-A(4):547-51. [Medline].
  • Selesnick FH, Dolitsky B, Haskell SS. Fracture of the coronoid process requiring open reduction with internalfixation. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Oct 1984;66(8):1304-6. [Medline].

Coronoid Fracture excerpt

Article Last Updated: May 18, 2006