You are in: eMedicine Specialties > Orthopedic Surgery > HAND AND UPPER EXTREMITY Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex InjuriesArticle Last Updated: Feb 9, 2007AUTHOR AND EDITOR INFORMATIONAuthor: James R Verheyden, MD, Consulting Surgeon, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Orthopedic & Neurosurgical Center of the Cascades James R Verheyden is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Medical Association, and American Society for Surgery of the Hand Coauthor(s): Andrew K Palmer, MD, Chair, Professor, Department of Orthopedics, State University of New York-Upstate Medical University Editors: Joseph E Sheppard, MD, Director of Hand and Upper Extremity, Associate Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Arizona; Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine; N Ake Nystrom, MD, PhD, Associate Professor of Orthopedic Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center; Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS, Associate Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School; Chief of Arthroscopic Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital; Harris Gellman, MD, Consulting Surgeon, Broward Hand Center, Voluntary Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery and Plastic Surgery, Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine Author and Editor Disclosure Synonyms and related keywords: TFCC, triangular fibrocartilage, TFC, carpal articular disk, discus articularis, triangular ligament, triangular cartilage, triangular disk, meniscus INTRODUCTIONIn 1981, Palmer and Werner introduced the term "triangular fibrocartilage complex" (TFCC) to describe the ligamentous and cartilaginous structures that suspend the distal radius and ulnar carpus from the distal ulna (see Image 1). The TFCC is the major ligamentous stabilizer of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) and the ulnar carpus. Functions of the TFCC are as follows:
History of the ProcedureSince DeSault's original dissertation in 1777 describing DRUJ injuries, much has been written about the DRUJ and the TFCC complex. As Palmer (1981) has pointed out, humans are differentiated from lower primates by a radiocarpal joint with a TFCC complex interposed between the ulna and carpus. This TFCC complex improves wrist functional stability and allows 6° of freedom at the wrist—flexion, extension, supination, pronation, and radial and ulnar deviation. As interest in this structure evolved, open repair techniques for the TFCC were devised. With recent advances in small joint arthroscopy, the potential for arthroscopic debridement or repair of these structures now exists. ProblemInjuries to the TFCC present with ulnar-sided wrist pain, frequently with clicking. Torn TFCCs constitute 35% of intra-articular fractures and 53% of extra-articular fractures. There is no correlation between ulnar styloid fractures and TFCC injuries. Patients with a torn TFCC display ulnar variance (radial shortening) that is on average 4.6 mm, versus 2.5 mm for no tear, and dorsal angulation of 24° versus 12° for no tear. FrequencyMikic (1978) looked at 180 wrist joints in 100 cadavers, ranging in age from fetuses to 94 years. He demonstrated that degeneration of the TFCC begins in the third decade of life and progressively increases in frequency and severity in subsequent decades. After the fifth decade of life, he noted no normal appearing TFCCs. Viegas and Ballantyne (1987) found similar results. EtiologyCausative conditions for TFCC injuries include the following:
PathophysiologyIn 1983, Palmer and Werner looked at the axial load distribution through the distal radius and ulna. They demonstrated that with normal axial loading, 20% of the force is transmitted through the ulna and 80% is transmitted through the radius. Their data also illustrated that small changes in relative ulnar length can significantly alter load patterns across the wrist. For example, with a distal radius fracture that settles 2.5 mm, an increase in ulnar axial load of approximately 40% can be expected. Palmer, Werner, Glisson, and Murphy (1988) demonstrated that the percentage of axial force transmitted through the ulna decreases by sequential removal of the horizontal portion of the TFCC. This percentage decrease is accentuated with more positive ulnar variance. In a cadaver study, Adams (1993) demonstrated that no significant kinematic or structural changes resulted from an excision that did not violate the peripheral 2 mm of the disk and that constituted less than two thirds of the disk area. TFCC tears are associated with a positive ulnar variance. Ulnar variance increases with pronation and grip and decreases with supination. The floor of the extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) tendon sheath broadly connects with the TFCC. After release of the TFCC from its distal ulna attachment, Tang (1998) demonstrated a 30% increase in ECU tendon excursion during wrist extension. This suggests the following:
ClinicalThe history of TFCC injuries includes ulnar-sided wrist pain (frequently accompanied with clicking), a fall or trauma, and/or mechanical symptoms that improve with rest and worsen with activity. In the physical examination, look for the following:
INDICATIONSIf a congruent reduction cannot be achieved or if the dorsal instability is unstable in 30° of supination, then arthroscopic evaluation of the TFCC is recommended with repair as needed. RELEVANT ANATOMYThe TFCC is triangular in shape. Palmer (1984) found an inverse relationship between ulnar variance and the thickness of the TFCC; the TFCC is thicker in individuals who are ulnar minus. Generally, the TFCC is 1-2 mm thick at its center. This may thicken to 5 mm where the TFCC inserts into the eccentric concavity of the ulnar head and projecting styloid. The TFCC extends ulnarly to insert into the base of the ulnar styloid (see Image 4). Distally, it inserts into the lunate via the ulnolunate (UL) ligament and the triquetrum via the ulnotriquetral (UT) ligament (see Image 5), hamate, and base of the fifth metacarpal. Radially, the TFCC arises from the ulnar margin of the lunate fossa of the radius (see Image 6). Underneath the TFCC is the ulnar head. The seat, or the convex portion of the ulnar head, articulates with the sigmoid notch of the radius (see Image 7). The cartilage-covered nonarticular pole of the ulnar head is deep to the articular disk. The ulnocarpal portion of the TFCC is composed of the discus articularis and the UL and UT ligaments (referred to by some as the disk carpal ligaments). Embryologic studies have demonstrated that these ligaments arise from the disk and are critical to the carpal suspensory function of the TFCC. The dorsal and palmar branches of the anterior interosseous artery and dorsal and palmar radiocarpal branches from the ulnar artery supply blood to the periphery of the TFCC. These vessels supply the TFCC in a radial fashion, with histologic sections demonstrating that the vessels penetrate the peripheral 10-40% of the disk. The central portion and radial attachment are avascular. Mikic demonstrated that the percentage of the peripheral disk that is vascularized is reduced from one third in a young patient to one fourth in patients of advanced age. Because the periphery of the TFCC has a good blood supply, tears in this region can be repaired. In contrast, tears in the central avascular area must be debrided, as they have no potential for healing. The richly vascularized dorsal radioulnar ligament (DRUL) and palmar radioulnar ligament (PRUL) are composed of thick, longitudinally oriented collagen fiber bundles that blend in with the central avascular fibrocartilaginous portion. Viewing the TFCC during wrist arthroscopy, the styloid attachment appears folded. Some of the blood vessels to the TFCC enter between these folds. This fold, combined with the vascular hilum, is termed the ligamentum subcruentum, which actually is the confluence of the TFCC and the V-shaped ligament (disk ligament) as it extends from the hilar area of the styloid to its twin insertions on the lunate and triquetrum. From a distal perspective, the TFCC has 2 distinct insertions into the ulna—a superficial portion and a deep portion. The superficial components, the DRUL and PRUL, insert into the base of the styloid. The deep portion, or the ligamentum subcruentum, inserts into the fovea near the axis of forearm rotation. CONTRAINDICATIONSRepairing TFCC tears is contraindicated in the presence of infection or degeneration. Palmer class 2 (see the Palmer classification for triangular fibrocartilage complex abnormalities in Treatment, Medical therapy, below) degenerative TFCC tears represent a pathologic progression of disease associated with ulnar impaction syndrome. Degeneration of the TFCC is found with repetitive pronation and axial grip loading in association with ulnar positive variance and impaction between the ulnar head and the proximal pole of the lunate. Treatment of degenerative TFCC tears associated with ulnar impaction syndrome consists of nonoperative treatment first with immobilization, avoidance of aggravating activities, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Palmer class 2A and 2B lesions that fail to respond to conservative treatment are treated with gentle debridement. If the patient is ulnar positive and symptomatic, a formal ulnar shortening is considered. An arthroscopic wafer is contraindicated, as this would require resection of intact TFCC to perform the procedure or require performing the procedure entirely through the DRUJ portals. The surgical indications for an arthroscopic wafer procedure are a Palmer class 2C or 2D lesion in an ulnar positive variance of not more than 2 mm without evidence of lunate-triquetrum instability. If lunate-triquetrum instability is present, this is addressed with formal ulnar shortening in an attempt to tighten the ulnocarpal ligaments and decrease the motion between the lunate and triquetrum. For patients with an ulnar positive variance of more than 2 mm, formal ulnar shortening is performed. For patients with ulnar neutral or negative variance and a Palmer class 2C lesion, an arthroscopic debridement is performed. Palmer class 2E lesions respond unpredictably to arthroscopic debridement. They are usually treated with a salvage procedure such as a limited ulnar head resection, Sauve-Kapandji procedure, or Darrach procedure that addresses the DRUJ and lunate-triquetrum joint pathology. WORKUPImaging Studies
Diagnostic Procedures
TREATMENTMedical therapyInitial treatment of both symptomatic degenerative and traumatic tears is 8-12 weeks of conservative therapy consisting of the following:
The natural history of symptomatic tears according to Osterman's (1991) study of 133 patients is as follows:
Palmer classification for triangular fibrocartilage complex abnormalities Class 1: Traumatic
Class 2: Degenerative (ulnocarpal abutment syndrome) stage
Acute isolated TFCC disruption with dislocation or instability of the distal radioulnar joint Isolated TFCC disruptions may be associated with DRUJ instability. These injuries are often associated with distal radius and forearm fractures. Forced hyperpronation usually results in dorsal dislocation. On physical examination, the ulnar head is prominent dorsally and the patient has limited forearm supination. Less commonly, volar dislocation results from forced supination. On physical examination, dorsal skin dimpling is often observed and pronation is limited. The volarly displaced ulnar head is often not felt because of the overlying soft tissues. When dislocation of the ulnar head is not present, subluxation and instability are more difficult to diagnose. Subluxation and instability of the DRUJ are assessed on physical examination by shucking the radius and ulna past each other to determine the amount of dorsal/palmar laxity. This should be performed in neutral, pronation, and supination and compared to the opposite side. The more common dorsal DRUJ instability is reduced with the forearm in supination. Palmar DRUJ instability is reduced with the forearm in pronation. If a congruent reduction can be achieved and the forearm is stable through a full ROM, then the forearm is immobilized in a long arm cast in the position of stability for 4-6 weeks. With a dorsal dislocation, the preferred position of immobilization is in approximately 30° of supination for 4 weeks, followed by gradual reduction to neutral over the next 2 weeks. If a congruent reduction cannot be achieved or if the dorsal instability is unstable in 30° of supination, then arthroscopic evaluation of the TFCC is recommended with repair as needed. Surgical therapyIf the DRUJ remains unstable, open reduction is required to remove interposed structures. When instability persists with forearm ROM, supplemental Kirschner wire (K-wire) stabilization just proximal to the DRUJ is recommended for 4-6 weeks. Instability of the DRUJ is often associated with distal radius fractures and Galeazzi fractures-dislocations. Anatomic reduction of these fractures often stabilizes the DRUJ. When fixation of these fractures does not stabilize the DRUJ, stabilization can be obtained with either long arm casting in a reduced position, open reduction and TFCC repair, or supplemental K-wire fixation. Retting and Raskin (2001) noted a high association with Galeazzi fractures within 7.5 cm of the midarticular surface of the distal radius and with DRUJ instability after open reduction and internal fixation of the radial shaft fracture. In individuals with radial head fracture and tenderness over the DRUJ, every attempt should be made to preserve the radial head to prevent proximal migration of the radius. DRUJ disruption associated with a displaced radial head fracture and proximal migration of the radius is termed the Essex-Lopresti fracture. Geel and Palmer (1992) noted good results in 18 of 19 patients with radial head fracture and pain at the DRUJ, who were treated with open reduction and internal fixation of the radial head. Intraoperative detailsOpen repair
Wrist arthroscopy Indications for wrist arthroscopy include acute unstable tears, acute tears that fail to respond to conservative management, and chronic tears for which conservative management fails. General arthroscopic principles are as follows:
Treatment of traumatic central tears (Palmer class 1A)
Treatment of traumatic ulnar-side tears (Palmer class 1B) with outside-in technique
Treatment of ulnar extrinsic ligament tears (Palmer class 1C)
Treatment of traumatic radial side tears (Palmer class 1D) Debride as with a Palmer class 1A tear, or repair as follows:
Treatment of degenerative tears (Palmer classes 2A and 2B)
Treatment of degenerative tears (Palmer class 2C)
Treatment of degenerative tears (Palmer class 2D)
Treatment of degenerative tears (Palmer class 2E)
Ulnar-shortening osteotomy Consider ulnar-shortening osteotomy for patients with ulnar positive variance, patients in whom debridement fails, and/or patients who present with a delay in treatment of longer than 6 months. Advantages of an ulnar-shortening osteotomy are as follows:
Postoperative details
COMPLICATIONSComplications include the following:
OUTCOME AND PROGNOSISPalmer class IB tears and arthroscopic repair A review by de Araujo et al (1996) of 17 patients after arthroscopic repair of Palmer class IB tears, with an average patient age of 33 years, showed that at 8 months follow-up, 16 patients (48%) were satisfied or very satisfied; 1 patient was not satisfied. At 16-24 months' follow-up, 70% of the patients were satisfied. Palmer class ID tears and arthroscopic repair Sagerman and Short (1996) reviewed 12 patients after arthroscopic repair of Palmer class ID tears, with an average follow-up of 17 months, and found good or excellent results in 67% of patients. Palmer classes IB, IC, and ID tears and arthroscopic repair Trumble et al (Jan 1997) reviewed 24 patients after arthroscopic repair of Palmer classes IB, IC, and ID tears. The average patient age was 31 years. Treatment occurred within 4 months after injury, with a follow-up of 34 months. Postoperative ROM was 89%, and grip strength was 85%. Thirteen of 19 patients returned to their original jobs or sports. Follow-up studies demonstrated that the TFCC was intact in 12 of 15 patients. Arthroscopic repair Corso et al (1997) reviewed 44 patients (average age, 32.5 y) and 45 wrists with zone-specific repair and follow-up of 37 months and found excellent results in 29 patients, good results in 12 patients, fair results in 1 patient, and poor results in 3 patients. Arthroscopic debridement Minami et al (1996) reviewed 16 patients (average age, 30 y) with a follow-up of 35 months. Palmer class 1 tears were found in 11 patients, and Palmer class 2 tears were found in 5 patients. Of the 16 patients, 13 returned to their previous jobs. Ulnar positive and LT tears were associated with a poor outcome; Palmer class 1 tears were associated with excellent results; and Palmer class 2 tears were associated with poor results. Westkaemper et al (1998) reviewed 28 patients (average age, 30 y) with a follow-up of 15.4 months. Excellent results were found in 13 patients, with good results in 8 patients, fair results in 2 patients, and poor results in 5 patients. Ulnar shortening for triangular fibrocartilage complex tears associated with ulnar positive variance Minami and Kato (1998) reviewed 25 patients (average age, 32 y) with follow-up of 35 months. Ulnar variance averaged >3.5 mm. Ulnar shortening osteotomies of 3 mm, fixed with a 6-hole 3.5-mm dynamic compression plate (DCP), were performed. Twenty-three patients also had arthroscopy. Palmer class 1 tears were found in 15 patients; only the flap was removed. Palmer class 2 tears were found in 8 patients; no debridement was performed. Complete relief or only occasional mild pain was found in 23 patients. Of the 25 patients, 23 returned to their original work. Osteotomies healed at an average of 7 weeks. This research suggests that ulnar shortening is indicated in both traumatic and degenerative tears associated with ulnar positive variance. Ulnar shortening for delayed treatment of triangular fibrocartilage complex tears Trumble et al (Sep 1997) reviewed 21 patients (average age 32 y) with delay in treatment longer than 6 months and follow-up of 29 months. Palmer class 1 tears were repaired. Ulnar shortening osteotomies of 2-3 mm fixed with 6-hole 3.5-mm DCPs were performed. Complete pain relief was found in 19 of 21 patients. Grip strength was 83%; ROM was 81% of normal. Authors noted that delays in treatment of over 6 months from the time of injury resulted in a higher recurrence of symptoms; in these situations, they recommended combining arthroscopic repair with ulnar shortening. Ulnar shortening after failed debridement Hulsizer et al (1997) reviewed 97 patients with central or nondetached ulnar peripheral tears initially treated with debridement. Persistent pain more than 3 months after surgery was reported by 13 patients. A 2-mm ulnar shortening osteotomy, fixed with a 6-hole 3.5-mm DCP, was performed on these 13 patients. The average age of the patients was 34 years, and average ulnar variance was 0.4 mm. Complete pain relief at 2.3-year follow-up was reported by 12 of the 13 patients. An ulnar shortening osteotomy of 2 mm was recommended for patients in whom arthroscopic debridement failed. FUTURE AND CONTROVERSIESA large controversy exists concerning the biomechanical changes of the TFCC during pronation and supination. A number of authors claim that the dorsal RUL tightens during pronation and relaxes with supination. Others claim the exact opposite. Nakamura (Jun 1999) may have solved this conundrum by using a custom-made surface coil that allows complete freedom of wrist motion. He obtained MRI scans of the wrist in the coronal and sagittal planes at maximal pronation and neutral and maximal supination. He demonstrated that during pronation and supination, the triangular ligament twists at its origin. This should result in friction between the proximal side of the disk proper and the ulnar head during rotation, much like the windshield wiper on a car. Nakamura theorized that this friction may increase in ulnocarpal abutment syndrome because of ulnar variance and may explain the degeneration observed in Palmer class 2 TFCC tears. MULTIMEDIA
REFERENCES
Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Injuries excerpt Article Last Updated: Feb 9, 2007 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||