eMedicine - Superior Labral Lesions : Article by S Ashfaq Hasan, MD

You are in: eMedicine Specialties > Orthopedic Surgery > Shoulder

Superior Labral Lesions

Last Updated: January 23, 2006

Synonyms and related keywords: glenoid labrum, tears of the anteroinferior labrum, shoulder pathology, SLAP lesion, superior labrum anterior and posterior lesion, shoulder injury, throwing injury, dead arm syndrome, O'Brien sign, O'Brien's sign, active-compression test, peel-back phenomena, peel-back sign, Buford complex, Buford's complex, Jobe relocation test, dead arm syndrome, drive-through sign

AUTHOR INFORMATION Section 1 of 11

Author Information Introduction Indications Relevant Anatomy And Contraindications Workup Treatment Complications Outcome And Prognosis Future And Controversies Pictures Bibliography

Author: S Ashfaq Hasan, MD, Assistant Professor, Director, Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

S Ashfaq Hasan, MD, is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Editor(s): Lynn A Crosby, MD, FACS, Chief of Shoulder Division, Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Wright State University School of Medicine; Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine; Pekka A Mooar, MD, Associate Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Temple University School of Medicine; Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS, Associate Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School; Chief of Arthroscopic Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital; and Mary Ann E Keenan, MD, Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine; Chief, Neuro-Orthopedic Service, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

Disclosure

INTRODUCTION

Section 2 of 11

Author Information Introduction Indications Relevant Anatomy And Contraindications Workup Treatment Complications Outcome And Prognosis Future And Controversies Pictures Bibliography

The glenoid labrum is a triangular fibrocartilaginous structure that serves to deepen the glenoid. While tears of the anteroinferior labrum have long been known to be associated with significant shoulder pathology, injuries of the superior labrum have really only been appreciated as a potential pathological lesion since the advent of shoulder arthroscopy. The superior labrum often has a more meniscoid attachment to the glenoid rim compared with the remainder of the labrum and therefore may be more susceptible to both degenerative as well as traumatic lesions. It also serves as part of the origin of the long head of the biceps. Injuries to the superior labral biceps complex can compromise the biceps anchor. Furthermore, the repetitive tensile force exerted by the biceps on the superior labrum likely contributes to poor healing of superior labral tears.

Andrews first described tears of the superior labrum in 1985. In a study that reviewed their experience in 73 throwing athletes, the authors identified tears of the labrum involving the anterosuperior aspect near the origin of the biceps tendon. They attributed this lesion to the biceps tendon being pulled off the labrum due to force generated during the throwing motion. In 1990, Snyder et al coined the term SLAP to denote a superior labrum, anterior and posterior lesion to describe a more extensive injury. A SLAP lesion as described by Snyder involves a tear of the superior labrum, which starts posteriorly and extends anteriorly to include the anchor of the biceps tendon to the superior labrum. The injuries were subdivided into 4 types (I-IV) as are detailed below.

Similar to Andrew's findings, a subset of patients who reported a traction injury was identified. However, the majority of patients related a history of a compressive injury to the shoulder secondary to fall on an outstretched arm in a flexed and abducted position.

For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Sprains and Strains Center and Hand, Wrist, Elbow, and Shoulder Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education articles Repetitive Motion Injuries and Rotator Cuff Injury.

History of the Procedure: Initial operative treatment of SLAP lesions consisted of debridement only. This therapy is appropriate for type I and type III lesions, as well as for some type IV lesions, in which the biceps anchor is intact. However, in type II and in type IV lesions in which the biceps anchor is unstable, debridement alone yields poor results.

Early attempts at arthroscopic fixation used a metal staple. This technique was discontinued because of concerns for chondral injury as well as the need for a second surgery for staple removal. For similar reasons, techniques involving a metal screw are no longer used. A transglenoid technique similar in concept to a transglenoid technique for a Bankart repair has been described; however, this is technically difficult and has fallen out of favor. Good results were initially reported with use of a bioabsorbable tack. However, complications, including implant breakage with resultant particulate debris and a foreign body reaction, have been reported.

Currently, suture anchors loaded with nonabsorbable suture are preferred.

Problem: SLAP lesions can cause painful mechanical symptoms and difficulty with overhead activities whether they be athletic or those of daily living. SLAP lesions, as opposed to occult anterior instability, are likely the underlying cause of the so-called dead arm syndrome in throwing athletes. Regardless of whether injuries to the superior labrum biceps complex are secondary to a throwing or nonthrowing etiology, they can be a source of considerable disability for the patient.

These injuries are difficult to diagnose on physical examination because the findings are often nonspecific and demonstrate considerable overlap with those of other etiologies of shoulder pain. Similarly, both nonenhanced MRI and magnetic resonance arthrography have variable accuracy in determining if a SLAP lesion is present. At times, the only definitive way to diagnose a SLAP lesion is with a diagnostic arthroscopy. Even so, a thorough understanding of the normal anatomy and biomechanics of the superior labral biceps complex, as well as commonly observed normal anatomic variants, is mandatory to ensure appropriate surgical stabilization and to avoid unnecessary repair of the superior labrum.

In 1990, Snyder classified superior labral tears into 4 types. A type I lesion is characterized by significant fraying of the labrum, but the biceps anchor is intact. A type II lesion is a tear of the superior labrum that results in instability of the biceps anchor. Significant fraying of the labrum occurs as is observed in type I tears; in addition, the superior labrum and associated biceps anchor is stripped away from the superior glenoid. A type III lesion describes a bucket-handle tear of the superior labrum. The central portion of the superior labrum is torn and usually displaced into the joint. The peripheral attachment of the labrum is intact, and the biceps anchor is usually stable. A bucket-handle tear of the superior labrum also characterizes a type IV lesion; however, the tear also propagates to a variable degree into the biceps tendon. Modifications have been made to the original classification.

In 1998, Morgan and Burkhart subdivided the type II lesions into anterior type II, posterior type II, and combined type II, referring to the tear involving the labrum both anterior and posterior to the biceps anchor.

In 1995, Maffet et al expanded the classification to include types V, VI, and VII. A type V SLAP refers to a Bankart lesion that extends superiorly to include the superior labrum and biceps anchor. A type VI lesion has a flap tear of either the anterior or posterior superior labrum with an associated type II tear. A type VII lesion describes a tear of the superior labrum that includes the middle glenohumeral ligament. Type II lesions are by far the most common and are also the source of the greatest diagnostic difficulty.

Frequency: SLAP lesions are unusual. The reported prevalence in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy has ranged from 3.9-6%. In the largest series reported, SLAP lesions represented 6% of 2375 patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy. The average age was noted to be 38 years, and 91% of the patients were male. The reported incidence of types I-IV is variable, with type II lesions being the most common. Type I lesions have been reported to account for 9.5-21% of all cases; type II, 41-55%; type III, 6-33%; and type IV, 3-15%.

Etiology: When one considers the etiology of SLAP tears, dividing them into 2 broad categories, traction and compression injuries, is useful. A compression injury is usually secondary to a fall on an outstretched arm that is in an abducted and slightly flexed position. This can result in a compressive load to the superior labrum with a resultant tear. A direct blow to the shoulder has also been found to be a contributing factor for SLAP lesions. Traction injuries can be secondary to a sudden pull in an inferior direction such as occurs when an individual loses hold of a heavy object. An overhead traction force, as when individuals attempt to catch themselves from falling from a height, can also result in a superior labral injury.

Clearly, engaging in throwing sports can predispose one to developing a SLAP lesion. The exact mechanism of this is somewhat controversial. In Andrews' original 1985 study, traction force placed on the superior labrum by the biceps tendon in the follow-through phase of the throwing motion was thought to be responsible for creating a SLAP lesion. The hypothesis was that the eccentric contraction of the biceps necessary to decelerate the elbow resulted in the biceps tendon detaching portions of the glenoid labrum. However, recent studies suggest that the forces generated during the late cocking phase are in fact the predominant factor. The peel-back phenomena as described by Morgan and Burkhart in 1998, along with shear forces generated by a tight posteroinferior capsule are thought to be major contributing factors to developing a type II SLAP or variants thereof.

The presence of a peel-back sign can be demonstrated arthroscopically. The arm is placed into 70-90° of abduction and then progressively externally rotated. In this position, the biceps vector is now more posteriorly and vertically oriented. To accommodate this, the base of the biceps twists. A torsional load is transmitted to the superior labrum, and if the posterosuperior labrum and biceps anchor is incompetent, medial displacement of the superior labral biceps complex occurs. If more than 5 mm of the posterosuperior glenoid is uncovered or the biceps root at the level of the supraglenoid tubercle is uncovered, a posterior type II SLAP is present.

As already noted, posterior capsule tightness is thought to play an important role in the development of SLAP lesions. Almost all high-demand throwers develop a posterior capsular contracture with limitation of internal rotation. This tight posteroinferior capsule is thought to result in obligatory superior translation of the humeral head when the arm is in abduction and external rotation and as a result exposes the superior labrum to large shear forces. This increased shear force is most pronounced at the same time the peel-back forces are at their maximum, increasing the likelihood of a SLAP lesion developing.

Pathophysiology: To accurately classify SLAP lesions, one must be aware of normal anatomy including the many normal variants that are observed. The biceps tendon origin is divided roughly in half between the supraglenoid tubercle and the superior labrum. Vangsness et al in their 1994 study demonstrated that 55% of the time the labral insertion is entirely or mostly into the posterior labrum. Only a small percentage (approximately 8%) has a predominant anterior insertion. The remainder, approximately 37%, has equal insertions to the anterior and posterior labrum.

In 1992, Cooper et al in their anatomic study noted that the superior portion of the labrum had a distinctly different morphology compared with the inferior labrum. The superior and anterosuperior portions were found to be loosely attached to the glenoid rim through thin connective tissue that easily stretched. This is similar to that of the meniscus of the knee. In contrast, the inferior labrum has a firm attachment through thick inelastic fibers and appears as a firm immobile extension of the glenoid articular cartilage. The 12-o'clock position was the only location on the glenoid rim where the hyaline articular cartilage extended over the rim of the glenoid. The biceps tendon inserts into the supraglenoid tubercle, which is 5 mm medial to the glenoid rim. This, along with the often meniscoid attachment of the superior labrum results in a sublabral recess.

This should not be mistaken for a type II SLAP lesion. As reported by DePalma, a sublabral recess may be present in up to 50% of individuals older than 20 years. This incidence increases with patient age. More than 95% of the specimens in DePalma's study obtained from patients in the seventh and eighth decades of life were found to have a sublabral recess.

The middle glenohumeral ligament can sometimes insert directly into the superior labrum as a large thick cordlike structure, ie, the so-called Buford complex. In these cases, the anterosuperior labrum is absent. The Buford complex is not pathologic and should not be stabilized because to do so would markedly restrict external rotation. A sublabral foramen can be observed where the anterosuperior labrum, from approximately the 1- to 3-o'clock position in a right shoulder, is loosely attached or not attached at all to the glenoid rim. Again, this is not pathologic and should not be stabilized. To do so would result in a significant loss of external rotation.

Histologically, the superior labrum is composed of fibrocartilage. This is composed of type II cartilage in a relatively acellular matrix with occasional interspersed elastin fibrils. This is in contrast to the hyaline cartilage of the glenoid and the dense fibrous glenohumeral capsule. Branches of the suprascapular, circumflex scapular, and posterior humeral circumflex supply the labrum. Periosteal and capsular vessels supply the labrum throughout its periphery. No vessels enter the labrum from the underlying bone. In general, the superior and anterosuperior labrum have less vascularity than other portions of the labrum.

On a biomechanical level, incompetence of the superior labrum and biceps anchor has been shown to have a deleterious effect on anterior glenohumeral stability. In 1994, Rodosky et al compared anterior glenohumeral stability in specimens with an intact superior labrum with those with a SLAP lesion in a cadaver study. They demonstrated that the presence of a SLAP lesion decreased the torsional resistance by 11-19% as compared with the intact shoulder, as it was placed in the abducted and externally rotated position. The inferior glenohumeral ligament was subject to significantly increased strain (increase by >100%) in the presence of a SLAP lesion. In 1995, Pagnani and Deng et al in another cadaver study demonstrated that a SLAP lesion results in significant increases in both anterior-posterior and superior-inferior translations. At 45° of elevation, a 6-mm increase was noted in anterior translation with the arm in neutral rotation and a 6.3-mm increase in translation in internal rotation occurred.

Several other studies have examined the strain changes in the superior labrum and biceps anchor with different positions of the throwing motion. In 2001, Pradhan et al found that a significant increase in strain in the anterior and posterior portions of the superior labrum only occurs when the arm is in maximum external rotation as found in the late cocking phase. Furthermore, the strain in the posterior portion of the superior labrum was significantly higher than that of the anterior portion.

In 2003, Kuhn et al supported these findings with their study of failure patterns of the biceps superior labral complex. They found that failure was significantly more likely in the late cocking position as compared to the early acceleration position. In the late cocking position, 9 of 10 specimens demonstrated failure of the biceps superior labral complex. In contrast, of the 10 paired specimens that were tested in the early acceleration position, only 2 had failure of the biceps superior labral complex. The load to failure was found to be significantly less in the late cocking position than in the early acceleration position. Of the 5 patients that developed type II SLAP lesions, 4 of these occurred in the late cocking positions.

These studies emphasize the important role the biceps superior labral complex likely plays in anterior shoulder stability. An unstable SLAP lesion found in the course of a Bankart repair should be stabilized. The important role of the posterior portion of the superior labrum likely reflects the fact that the biceps tendon attachment is usually posterior-dominant as demonstrated in the 1994 study by Vangsness et al. In repairing SLAP lesions, particular attention should be given to ensuring the posterior aspect is well stabilized.

Clinical: Patients often present describing a poorly defined pain that is often posterior in location. They can also describe a painful popping and clicking similar to mechanical symptoms associated with a meniscal tear. Nonthrowing individuals may report a history of a fall either on an outstretched arm or one in which a direct impact on the shoulder occurred. A history of a sudden deceleration injury, such as occurs when one loses control of a heavy object that is being carried, may be present. In a throwing athlete, a discrete injury with no prodromal period may be reported. In contrast, the athlete may not recall a specific injury and merely report a prodromal phase consisting of some mild posterior pain with a sense of posterior tightness.

The patient's range of motion should be carefully assessed, especially in the throwing athlete. Throwers often develop a loss of internal rotation in abduction. This loss of internal rotation with tightness of the posteroinferior capsule is thought to be a risk factor for the development of a SLAP lesion. One should be especially cognizant of this entity in an individual who presents with loss of internal rotation at the expense of a 180° arc of motion with the arm abducted 90°. In a 2001 report, Burkhart and Morgan postulated that this finding defines a shoulder at risk of developing a type II SLAP lesion and the dead arm syndrome.

An acute SLAP lesion, especially a posterior type II lesion can manifest as posterior shoulder pain in abduction and external rotation, decreased throwing velocity, and easy fatigability. This symptom complex has been labeled the dead arm syndrome. Multiple physical examination tests for a SLAP lesion have been described; however, correlation with arthroscopic findings has been poor. Furthermore follow-up studies by independent investigators have been unable to reproduce the high sensitivities, specificities, and positive-predictive values reported by the authors who originally described the tests.

In Snyder's initial 1990 report describing SLAP lesions, he used the biceps tension (Speed) test and the compression rotation test. The Speed sign is positive when pain is elicited with resisted flexion of the fully supinated arm with the elbow extended and the arm flexed to 90°. The compression-rotation sign is performed with the patient supine, the shoulder elevated to 90°, and the elbow flexed to 90°. An axial load is then applied to the humerus to compress the glenohumeral joint, and the arm is rotated. Pain as well as mechanical symptoms elicited during this test are considered positive test results. Multiple other tests have been described.

The O'Brien sign, or the active-compression test, is elicited by first placing the arm in 90° of forward flexion and 10° of adduction. The arm is then fully internally rotated into the thumbs-down position. The patient is then asked to resist downward pressure to the arm that is applied by the examiner. Differentiate deep-seated shoulder pain from that localized to the anterosuperior aspect of the shoulder because the latter is associated with acromioclavicular (AC) joint pathology. The test is then conducted again but with the arm in full supination; the pain should be decreased in this position as compared with the initial position for the test result to be considered positive. A positive Speed test as well as a positive O'Brien sign is thought to be consistent with an anterior type II SLAP tear.

In a 1995 article, Kibler described the anterior slide test to help diagnose anterior SLAP lesions. The patient is instructed to place both hands on the hips. The examiner stabilizes the scapula with one hand over the acromion. The other hand is used to axially load the humerus in anterior and superior direction. Pain with this motion is considered to be positive for an anterior based SLAP lesion.

In a 1999 report, Kim et al described the biceps tension test II. The shoulder is placed in 120° of abduction and full external rotation, and the elbow is flexed to 90° and fully supinated. The patient is then instructed to flex against resistance. Pain with this is consistent with a SLAP lesion. Kim et al also described the biceps tension test I to help determine the presence of a SLAP lesion in the patient with unidirectional anterior instability. An anterior apprehension test is first performed, which in this subgroup of patients is positive for instability. Resisted elbow flexion with the arm fully supinated should decrease the sensation of instability if the biceps superior labral complex is intact. In the presence of a SLAP lesion, no alleviation of the instability sensation occurs.

The Jobe relocation test has been used to help diagnose posterior type II SLAP lesions. The patient is placed in the supine position. The arm is placed in 90° of abduction and maximum external rotation. Pain in this position that is alleviated with a posteriorly directed force to the proximal humerus is consistent with a posterior type II lesion. Differentiate the sensation of pain in this test as opposed to that of instability found in an anteriorly unstable shoulder. Patients with type III and type IV lesions are more likely to report mechanical symptoms, although eliciting these on physical examination is often difficult.

Despite the multitude of described tests for a SLAP lesion, none has proven to be reliable to date. Follow-up independent studies have demonstrated poor sensitivities, specificities, and positive predictive values.

Check for rotator cuff impingement signs on examination. The prevalence of rotator cuff tears, either partial or full-thickness, in patients with SLAP lesions has been noted to be in the 30-40% range.

INDICATIONS Section 3 of 11

Author Information Introduction Indications Relevant Anatomy And Contraindications Workup Treatment Complications Outcome And Prognosis Future And Controversies Pictures Bibliography

Surgical treatment is indicated in patients with persistent symptoms despite 3 months of nonoperative treatment. These patients should have persistent posterior shoulder pain, with or without mechanical symptoms, and findings on physical examination consistent with a SLAP lesion and ideally have supportive MRI findings. However, note that physical findings as well as MRI findings are often equivocal. If a high clinical suspicion exists, with the patient continuing to be symptomatic after an appropriate amount of conservative treatment, then strong consideration should be given to diagnostic arthroscopy.

RELEVANT ANATOMY AND CONTRAINDICATIONS Section 4 of 11

Author Information Introduction Indications Relevant Anatomy And Contraindications Workup Treatment Complications Outcome And Prognosis Future And Controversies Pictures Bibliography

Relevant Anatomy: See Etiology and Pathophysiology.

Contraindications: See Etiology and Pathophysiology.

Quick Find

Author Information
Introduction
Indications
Relevant Anatomy And Contraindications
Workup
Treatment
Complications
Outcome And Prognosis
Future And Controversies
Pictures
Bibliography

Click for related images.

Patient Education

Sprains and Strains Center

Hand, Wrist, Elbow, and Shoulder Center

Repetitive Motion Injuries Overview

Repetitive Motion Injuries Causes

Repetitive Motion Injuries Symptoms

Repetitive Motion Injuries Treatment

Rotator Cuff Injury Overview

WORKUP

Section 5 of 11

Author Information Introduction Indications Relevant Anatomy And Contraindications Workup Treatment Complications Outcome And Prognosis Future And Controversies Pictures Bibliography

Imaging Studies:

On plain radiography of the shoulder, an anteroposterior view of the shoulder in internal and external rotation, outlet, and axillary views should be obtained. Findings are usually normal.

Occasionally, a SLAP fracture, which represents a superior humeral head compression fracture, can be observed.

Plain radiographs should be carefully reviewed for other potential pathology, such as an os acromiale, an anterior acromial spur, or a degenerative AC joint.

Nonenhanced MRI has proven to be unreliable in determining the presence of SLAP tears. It is useful to evaluate potential concomitant pathology, such as partial thickness or full thickness rotator cuff tears. It is also valuable in detecting the presence of a paralabral cyst. Ganglion cysts encroaching on the spinoglenoid notch are associated with superior, usually posterior, labral tears.

The use of contrast medium as in magnetic resonance arthrography offers improved visualization of intra-articular structures and is thought to improve the ability to accurately detect SLAP tears; however, reported results continue to be highly variable.

Two useful signs on MRI are those of increased signal intensity in the posterior third of the superior labrum and a laterally curved intensity. The sublabral recess does not usually extend to the posterior third of the superior labrum, and therefore, high signal intensity between the labrum and the glenoid in this region is considered to be consistent with a superior labral tear. Another MRI finding considered to be highly suggestive of a superior labral tear is laterally curved signal intensity. On the contrary, a normal sublabral recess results in a medially curved area of signal intensity.

TREATMENT

Section 6 of 11

Author Information Introduction Indications Relevant Anatomy And Contraindications Workup Treatment Complications Outcome And Prognosis Future And Controversies Pictures Bibliography

Medical therapy: Initial treatment of suspected SLAP lesions should be nonoperative. Emphasis should be on rest, which means an initial period of no throwing. Capsular stretching, especially of the posteroinferior capsule, is important. Physical therapy focusing on rotator cuff and scapula stabilizer strengthening may be helpful.

Surgical therapy: Initially, a complete diagnostic arthroscopy is performed. The rotator cuff should be carefully inspected for any partial thickness or full-thickness tears. The biceps anchor is inspected. Be aware of the potential normal variants as discussed earlier in this article (see Pathophysiology). Type III and type IV SLAP lesions are fairly obvious arthroscopically. The difficulty can sometimes come in differentiating a type I lesion from a type II as well as accurately diagnosing type II lesions and variants thereof.

Type I lesions are often associated with a meniscoid superior labrum where the lateral aspect is draped over the rim of the glenoid superiorly and the attachment is more peripheral. This particular morphology is more susceptible to developing degenerative tears, which is the pathology observed in type I lesions. Care must be taken not to assume that this meniscoid labrum represents a displaced type II lesion. A probe is placed under the superior labrum, and a firm attachment is demonstrated. In inspecting the superior labral attachment, the key factor to evaluate is if whether more than 5 mm of superior glenoid is exposed under the labrum. A superior sublabral recess is often observed and is a normal finding. However, if this recess is greater than 5 mm, the biceps anchor is highly likely to be unstable.

The superior labrum both anterior and posterior to the biceps root should be carefully probed. Placing the arm in approximately 70-90° of abduction and then progressively externally rotating the arm can demonstrate the peel-back sign, which is observed with type II posterior lesions as well as in combined anterior and posterior type II lesions. If more than 5 mm of the posterosuperior glenoid is uncovered or the biceps root at the level of the supraglenoid tubercle is uncovered with this maneuver, then the peel-back sign is positive and the superior labrum must be repaired. The peel-back sign is not usually observed with type II anterior SLAP lesions. A positive drive-through sign where the arthroscope can be easily passed from the superior aspect of the joint to the inferior recess without any manual distraction is observed with all 3 variants of type II SLAP lesions. This anterior pseudolaxity is usually resolved with repair of the SLAP lesion, and the drive-through sign is eliminated.

Surgical treatment of a type I lesion consists of debridement. Similarly, in a type III lesion, the bucket-handle tear of the meniscus can be debrided because the biceps anchor is intact. In a type II lesion, the biceps anchor is repaired back down to the superior labrum with suture anchors. In type IV lesions, if less than 30% of the tendon is involved and the biceps anchor is intact, then the involved labrum and tendon can be resected. If more than 30% involvement is noted in an older patient, a biceps tenodesis can be performed. In the younger more active individual, suture repair of the tendon, along with suture anchor repair of the labrum, should be performed.

Various techniques have been described to repair the superior labrum arthroscopically. These include the use of metal staples, metal screws, bioabsorbable tacks, and a transglenoid technique. Metal staples and screws require a second surgery for removal and are no longer used. Good results have been reported with the use of bioabsorbable tacks; however, concerns over potential particulate debris and foreign body reaction have led many surgeons to use suture anchors loaded with nonabsorbable suture.

Preoperative details: General anesthesia supplemented with an interscalene block is the preferred anesthetic technique. An examination with the patient under anesthesia is conducted to assess for any capsular contracture or instability. The patient is placed in the beach-chair position.

Intraoperative details: A standard posterior viewing portal is made. An anteroinferior portal is made just above the subscapularis tendon using an outside-in spinal needle localization technique. Similarly, an anterosuperior portal is made. The incision for this portal is just off the anterolateral corner of the acromion and enters the joint through the rotator interval laterally. Importantly, place these portals in a parallel fashion; spinal needle localization can aid in achieving this prior to incision for the portals. Cannulas are placed in both portals. The area of labral detachment is debrided, initially with a soft tissue resector, and the bone is then lightly dusted with a burr.

The instrumentation for anchor placement can then be introduced either though the cannula in the anterosuperior portal or percutaneously through the musculotendinous junction of the supraspinatus. The authors prefer percutaneous placement of the anchors. A bioabsorbable anchor loaded with 2 nonabsorbable sutures is then placed.

The number of suture anchors used depends on the extent of the tear. Initially, the more posterior limb of one suture pair is then retrieved into and out of the anteroinferior cannula. A variety of techniques exist to pass this suture through the labrum. The authors prefer to initially pass a looped 2-0 Prolene suture through the labrum using a curved suture passer. The 2 free ends of the Prolene suture are retrieved out of the anterosuperior cannula. The looped end of the suture, which now resides in the anteroinferior cannula, is used to shuttle the limb of the anchor suture through the labrum. An arthroscopic knot is tied after both limbs of the anchor suture have been retrieved into the anterosuperior cannula.

The second suture is then passed through the labrum in a similar fashion, and an arthroscopic knot is tied. At this time, the need for additional anchors is assessed and they are placed as necessary.

Ensure that the posterosuperior labrum is adequately stabilized in order to neutralize the peel-back forces. In introducing a posterosuperior anchor, using a posterolateral portal is usually necessary because the posterosuperior glenoid has a steep angle that makes instrumentation from the more anterior portal difficult. This posterolateral portal can be made without a cannula by passing the sheath for the anchor instruments directly through the rotator cuff at the musculotendinous junction.

Postoperative details: The patient is kept in a sling for 3 weeks. Codman is initiated week 2. Passive range of motion exercises, including elevation and external rotation by the side, are also initiated week 2. No external rotation in abduction is allowed for the first 3 weeks because of the peel-back mechanism. Range-of-motion exercises, including passive posterior capsule and internal rotation stretching, are progressed during weeks 3-6.

At 6 weeks, progressive strengthening of the rotator cuff, scapula stabilizers, biceps, and the deltoid is initiated. Throwing athletes are allowed to begin an interval throwing program at 4 months. At 6 months, throwing from a mound is allowed. Pitchers may resume throwing at full velocity at 7 months postoperatively. Throughout the rehabilitation, as well as after, the patient should continue stretching the posteroinferior capsule daily. A recurrence of the capsular contracture can once again put the shoulder at risk for developing a SLAP lesion.

For nonathletes, the initial 4 months of rehabilitation is identical to that of throwers. At the 4-month mark, they can usually resume full activities.

COMPLICATIONS Section 7 of 11

Author Information Introduction Indications Relevant Anatomy And Contraindications Workup Treatment Complications Outcome And Prognosis Future And Controversies Pictures Bibliography

Neurologic injury is the most common complication reported after arthroscopic shoulder surgery. These complications can be minimized by careful attention to patient positioning as well as a thorough knowledge of the neurovascular anatomy of the shoulder. When placing the patient in the beach-chair position, ensure that the head and neck are in a neutral position. Either hyperflexion or hyperextension could potentially lead to a neurologic injury.

When making the Neviaser portal, care must be taken to avoid too acute an angle or placing the portal too medial in order to avoid injury to the suprascapular nerve. When placing the suture anchors, ensure that the anchors are well seated below subchondral bone. If the anchors are too prominent, they may cause a chondral injury. The sutures should be tugged on to ensure that the anchors are well seated. Anchor migration, apart from compromising the repair, can result in significant chondral injury.

OUTCOME AND PROGNOSIS Section 8 of 11

Author Information Introduction Indications Relevant Anatomy And Contraindications Workup Treatment Complications Outcome And Prognosis Future And Controversies Pictures Bibliography

In general, good results have been reported with arthroscopic SLAP repairs. In 1998, Morgan et al reported on their results in 102 patients. About 83% of their patients had excellent results, and 14% had good results. All pitchers returned to pitching, 84% at preinjury level.

In 1995, Pagnani et al reported that 12 of 13 overhead athletes were able to return to full preinjury level of activity after an arthroscopic SLAP repair. In 1993, Field and Savoie, as well as Burkhart in 2001 reported similar findings. In Field and Savoie's study, all of the athletes were able to return to sports activities without limitation.

In a 1999 report, Kim et al evaluated their results in 34 individuals who underwent arthroscopic suture anchor repair of an isolated SLAP tear. Approximately 94% had a satisfactory result as determined by using the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score. Thirty-one (91%) of the patients regained their preinjury level of function. However, they did note poorer outcomes in overhead athletes as compared with those not participating in overhead athletic activities.

FUTURE AND CONTROVERSIES Section 9 of 11

Author Information Introduction Indications Relevant Anatomy And Contraindications Workup Treatment Complications Outcome And Prognosis Future And Controversies Pictures Bibliography

The etiology of shoulder pain and dysfunction, the dead arm syndrome, in throwing athletes is somewhat controversial. In 1991, Frank Jobe et al proposed that repetitive throwing stretches out the anterior capsuloligamentous structures, allowing anterosuperior migration during throwing with resultant subacromial impingement. They advocated open anterior capsulolabral reconstruction and reported a 50% return to pitching in 12 pitchers.

Christopher Jobe in 1995 and Gilles Walch in 1992 both described the concept of internal impingement. This refers to a spectrum of injury that involves the rotator cuff, posterosuperior labrum, and even bone. Similar to Frank Jobe's concept, the underlying pathology was thought to be stretching out of the anterior capsuloligamentous structures. In a normal shoulder, tightening of the anterior capsule such as occurs when the arm is placed in the abducted and externally rotated position results in obligate posterior translation of the humeral head. In the situation with lax anterior capsuloligamentous structures, this obligate posterior translation was postulated to not occur, leading to abnormal contact between the rotator cuff and posterior labrum because the head does not clear posteriorly. Anterior capsulolabral reconstruction was advocated as treatment. Results of this treatment have been mixed, with approximately 50% return to throwing.

In a 2001 article, Burkhart and Morgan have instead advocated type II SLAP lesions as the underlying cause of the dead arm syndrome. In a group of 53 throwing athletes, they reported a success rate of 87% in returning the patients to their preinjury activity level after arthroscopic SLAP repair.

PICTURES Section 10 of 11

Author Information Introduction Indications Relevant Anatomy And Contraindications Workup Treatment Complications Outcome And Prognosis Future And Controversies Pictures Bibliography

Caption: Picture 1. Superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesion types.
Click to see detail View Full Size Image

Picture Type: Image

Caption: Picture 2. Area of labral detachment is debrided to expose a bony bed. The awl for the anchor is introduced through the anterosuperior portal
View Full Size Image

Picture Type: Image

Caption: Picture 3. Bioabsorbable anchor double-loaded with nonabsorbable number 2 suture is then implanted
Click to see detail View Full Size Image

Picture Type: Image

Caption: Picture 4. One limb of each suture is passed through the labrum. Various suture passing techniques can be used to accomplish this.
View Full Size Image

Picture Type: Image

Caption: Picture 5. In a 1-anchor repair, 1 suture can passed through the labrum posterior to the biceps and the other anterior to the biceps and tied down. Multiple anchors should be used if necessary.
Click to see detail View Full Size Image

Picture Type: Image

BIBLIOGRAPHY Section 11 of 11

Author Information Introduction Indications Relevant Anatomy And Contraindications Workup Treatment Complications Outcome And Prognosis Future And Controversies Pictures Bibliography

Andrews JR, Carson WG Jr, McLeod WD: Glenoid labrum tears related to the long head of the biceps. Am J Sports Med 1985 Sep-Oct; 13(5): 337-41 [Medline].
Beltran J, Bencardino J, Mellado J, et al: MR arthrography of the shoulder: variants and pitfalls. Radiographics 1997 Nov-Dec; 17(6): 1403-12; discussion 1412-5[Medline].
Burkart A, Debski RE, Musahl V, McMahon PJ: Glenohumeral translations are only partially restored after repair of a simulated type II superior labral lesion. Am J Sports Med 2003 Jan-Feb; 31(1): 56-63[Medline].
Burkhart SS, Morgan CD: The peel-back mechanism: its role in producing and extending posterior type II SLAP lesions and its effect on SLAP repair rehabilitation. Arthroscopy 1998 Sep; 14(6): 637-40[Medline].
Burkhart SS, Morgan C: SLAP lesions in the overhead athlete. Orthop Clin North Am 2001 Jul; 32(3): 431-41, viii[Medline].
Connell DA, Potter HG, Wickiewicz TL: Noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging of superior labral lesions. 102 cases confirmed at arthroscopic surgery. Am J Sports Med 1999 Mar-Apr; 27(2): 208-13[Medline].
Cooper DE, Arnoczky SP, O'Brien SJ: Anatomy, histology, and vascularity of the glenoid labrum. An anatomical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992 Jan; 74(1): 46-52[Medline].
DePalma AF, Callery G, Bennett GA: Variational anatomy and degenerative lesions of the shoulder joint. AAOS Instructional Course Lectures 1949; 6: 255-281.
Field LD, Savoie FH: Arthroscopic suture repair of superior labral detachment lesions of the shoulder. Am J Sports Med 1993 Nov-Dec; 21(6): 783-90; discussion 790[Medline].
Jee WH, McCauley TR, Katz LD, et al: Superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) lesions of the glenoid labrum: reliability and accuracy of MR arthrography for diagnosis. Radiology 2001 Jan; 218(1): 127-32[Medline].
Jobe CM: Posterior superior glenoid impingement: expanded spectrum. Arthroscopy 1995 Oct; 11(5): 530-6[Medline].
Jobe FW, Giangarra CE, Kvitne RS, Glousman RE: Anterior capsulolabral reconstruction of the shoulder in athletes in overhand sports. Am J Sports Med 1991 Sep-Oct; 19(5): 428-34[Medline].
Kibler WB: Specificity and sensitivity of the anterior slide test in throwing athletes with superior glenoid labral tears. Arthroscopy 1995 Jun; 11(3): 296-300[Medline].
Kim SH, Ha KI, Han KY: Biceps load test: a clinical test for superior labrum anterior and posterior lesions in shoulders with recurrent anterior dislocations. Am J Sports Med 1999 May-Jun; 27(3): 300-3[Medline].
Kim SH, Ha KI, Kim SH, Choi HJ: Results of arthroscopic treatment of superior labral lesions. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002 Jun; 84-A(6): 981-5[Medline].
Kuhn JE, Lindholm SR, Huston LJ, et al: Failure of the biceps superior labral complex: a cadaveric biomechanical investigation comparing the late cocking and early deceleration positions of throwing. Arthroscopy 2003 Apr; 19(4): 373-9[Medline].
Maffet MW, Gartsman GM, Moseley B: Superior labrum-biceps tendon complex lesions of the shoulder. Am J Sports Med 1995 Jan-Feb; 23(1): 93-8[Medline].
Morgan CD, Burkhart SS, Palmeri M, Gillespie M: Type II SLAP lesions: three subtypes and their relationships to superior instability and rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 1998 Sep; 14(6): 553-65[Medline].
Nam EK, Snyder SJ: The diagnosis and treatment of superior labrum, anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesions. Am J Sports Med 2003 Sep-Oct; 31(5): 798-810[Medline].
O'Brien SJ, Pagnani MJ, Fealy S, et al: The active compression test: a new and effective test for diagnosing labral tears and acromioclavicular joint abnormality. Am J Sports Med 1998 Sep-Oct; 26(5): 610-3[Medline].
Pagnani MJ, Deng XH, Warren RF, et al: Effect of lesions of the superior portion of the glenoid labrum on glenohumeral translation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995 Jul; 77(7): 1003-10[Medline].
Pagnani MJ, Speer KP, Altchek DW, et al: Arthroscopic fixation of superior labral lesions using a biodegradable implant: a preliminary report. Arthroscopy 1995 Apr; 11(2): 194-8[Medline].
Pradhan RL, Itoi E, Hatakeyama Y: Superior labral strain during the throwing motion. A cadaveric study. Am J Sports Med 2001 Jul-Aug; 29(4): 488-92[Medline].
Prodromos CC, Ferry JA, Schiller AL, Zarins B: Histological studies of the glenoid labrum from fetal life to old age. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990 Oct; 72(9): 1344-8[Medline].
Rodosky MW, Harner CD, Fu FH: The role of the long head of the biceps muscle and superior glenoid labrum in anterior stability of the shoulder. Am J Sports Med 1994 Jan-Feb; 22(1): 121-30[Medline].
Snyder SJ, Karzel RP, Del Pizzo W, et al: SLAP lesions of the shoulder. Arthroscopy 1990; 6(4): 274-9[Medline].
Snyder SJ, Banas MP, Karzel RP: An analysis of 140 injuries to the superior glenoid labrum. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1995 Jul-Aug; 4(4): 243-8[Medline].
Stetson WB, Templin K: The crank test, the O'Brien test, and routine magnetic resonance imaging scans in the diagnosis of labral tears. Am J Sports Med 2002 Nov-Dec; 30(6): 806-9[Medline].
Tibone JE, Jobe FW, Kerlan RK, et al: Shoulder impingement syndrome in athletes treated by an anterior acromioplasty. Clin Orthop 1985 Sep; (198): 134-40[Medline].
Vangsness CT Jr, Jorgenson SS, Watson T, Johnson DL: The origin of the long head of the biceps from the scapula and glenoid labrum. An anatomical study of 100 shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994 Nov; 76(6): 951-4[Medline].
Walch G, Boileau P, Noel E: Impingement of the deep surface of the supraspinatus tendon on the posterosuperior glenoid rim. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1992; 1: 232-45.
Yoneda M, Hirooka A, Saito S, et al: Arthroscopic stapling for detached superior glenoid labrum. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991 Sep; 73(5): 746-50[Medline].

Superior Labral Lesions excerpt