Excerpt from Whipple DiseaseSynonyms, Key Words, and Related Terms: intestinal lipodystrophy, Tropheryma whippelii, T whippelii, WD, CNS-WD, Whipple disease with symptomatic CNS involvement, fever of unknown origin, polyarthralgias, chronic diarrhea Please click here to view the full topic text: Whipple DiseaseBackgroundWhipple disease (WD) constitutes a rare, relapsing, slowly progressive, infectious, systemic illness characterized by fever of unknown origin, polyarthralgias, and chronic diarrhea. Other manifestations include skin and ocular involvement (ie, uveitis, retinitis, optic neuritis); generalized lymphadenopathy; afebrile, blood culture-negative endocarditis which, reportedly, can be complicated with cardioembolic strokes; and a sarcoidosis-like syndrome with mediastinal lymph nodes and central nervous system (CNS) involvement (ie, dementia, sensory and motor deficits, ophthalmoplegia, myoclonus, stroke and hypothalamic damage with dysautonomia, emotional impairment, endocrinopathy). Less than 1000 cases have been reported, and less than one half (6-43%) of these patients presented with neurological manifestations. This likely represents an underestimate due to both a low index of suspicion in some cases and difficulties in reaching a diagnosis in others. This article, besides being a general presentation of WD, focuses on both the neurological manifestations and specifics of diagnosis and treatment of WD with symptomatic CNS involvement (CNS-WD). Despite the slowly progressive course of most cases of WD, CNS-WD may have a fulminant course, and manifest isolated CNS-WD cases have been reported in the literature. Prompt diagnosis is imperative, as very effective therapies are easy to employ with typically rapid limitation of CNS progression and even partial reversal of CNS symptoms. If left untreated, progression to death may come as quickly as 1 month after CNS involvement begins. PathophysiologyHistorical perspective 1907: Whipple proposed the name of "intestinal lipodystrophy" for a new, distinctive clinical syndrome. Whipple's case report presented a 36-year-old medical missionary with a 5-year history of episodes of relapsing-progressive polyarthritis subsequently complicated by weight loss, cough, fever, diarrhea, hypotension, abdominal swelling, increased skin pigmentation, and severe anemia. The hallmark of the pathologic report was the marked infiltration by foamy macrophages of joints and aortic valves, and prominent deposits of fat within intestinal mucosa and mesenteric lymph nodes, which made Whipple consider this case an obscure disease of fat metabolism and propose the name intestinal lipodystrophy. Whipple pointed out the existence of great numbers of peculiar rod-shaped bacteria found in extracts of lymph node tissue and lamina propria of the intestine. 1923: A second case of Whipple disease was reported in the literature. 1947: Peroral small bowel biopsy was used for the first time to make the first reported premortem diagnosis. 1949: Black-Schaffer advanced the diagnosis, proved the systemic nature of this disease, and raised the suspicion of an infectious cause for WD.
1952: Paulley was first to report a case of a patient with histologically proven WD whose symptoms responded to chloramphenicol. Other reports followed of successful attempts to treat patients with prolonged courses of antibiotics (12 mo or longer), particularly a combination of penicillin and streptomycin followed by trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX). 1961: Electron microscopy (EM) studies by Yardley et al provided more evidence for an infectious cause of WD by finding bacillary bodies within membrane-bound vesicles in the cytoplasm of macrophages. WD bacillus has a characteristic trilamellar appearance on EM. 1985: A survey by Keinath et al of 88 patients with WD whose symptoms responded to antibiotics revealed a high rate of relapse (40%, 31/88); many of the relapses were in the CNS, thus indicating the need to use antibiotics with adequate blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetrance. 1991-1992: Wilson et al reported Whipple bacillus as a gram-positive bacterium rich in guanine and cytosine and likely an actinomycete. They used a gene that encodes for 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) in bacteria to characterize the nucleotide sequence of the bacillus from a patient with WD. 1992: Relman et al confirmed the findings of Wilson et al and proposed a classification of the organism. Tropheryma whippelii, a previously uncharacterized organism, was, on the basis of phylogenetic analysis of a specific 16S rRNA gene sequence, a novel actinomycete.
1997: Ramzan et al used PCR to confirm WD in patients whose histologic studies of small intestine samples obtained by peroral biopsy were nonconfirmatory. PCR studies with 16S rDNA primers of T whippelii proved to be highly sensitive, specific, and useful for monitoring response to therapy and likelihood of relapse. Prior studies had shown no correlation between posttreatment histologic findings, clinical outcome, and likelihood of recurrence. 1997: A study by Herbay et al suggested that most, if not all, patients with WD have CNS involvement and only some develop clinical and radiologic evidence of CNS-WD; PCR analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was proposed as routine in the diagnostic evaluation of patients in whom WD is suspected. 2000: Raoult et al successfully cultivated T whippelii using a human fibroblast cell line (HEL). They completed 7 passages of an isolate obtained from the aortic valve of a patient with endocarditis caused by WD. The following findings confirmed that the isolates passaged were T whippelii: the amplified sequences of the 16S rRNA gene of the isolate were identical to those of T whippelii; transmission EM of the isolate revealed the distinctive trilamellar appearance of WD bacillus; PAS-positive bacilli (not acid fast but gram positive) were identified in an intracellular location in the cell-culture monolayer; and mice-produced polyclonal antibodies could detect the bacterium in the patient's excised heart valve.
2003: The genome sequencing of 2 different T whippelii strains (Twist and TW08/27) is achieved. It revealed interesting particularities, which could explain some of the clinical traits already observed. T whippelii genome encodes for around 800 protein coding genes. It lacks key biosynthetic pathways and has a reduced capacity for energy metabolism. It has a family of large surface proteins, some associated with large amounts of noncoding repetitive DNA, which appears to trigger frequent genome rearrangements, potentially resulting in the expression of different subsets of cell surface proteins. This could be the basis of a mechanism to evade host defenses. Host abnormalities A variety of host abnormalities has been reported in patients with WD. They point to an anomalous cytokine-driven regulation of both phagocytosis and humoral and cellular immunity and specifically suggest a defect in the axis of interleukin-12 (IL-12) and gamma interferon.
Humans remain the only known host for the disease. No evidence exists of person-to-person transmission, and no reported outbreaks have occurred. In Germany, an environmental source was suggested by findings of specific T whippelii DNA in sewage water and the saliva and jejunal juice of some healthy controls. The initial gastrointestinal (GI) involvement argues for this site as the entry portal of T whippelii and probable dissemination through the body by the lymphatics and bloodstream either directly or via a carrier (eg, monocytes). The brain ultimately represents a favored site, but the mechanism by which the BBB is breached is unclear and insidious, supporting the theory of carrier-mediated dissemination. Whether the clinical manifestations of WD result from direct bacterial invasion or from the ensuing inflammatory response is not clear. At this time, the inability to grow T whippelii in cell-free, medium-only culture prevents researchers from developing better testing procedures (eg, selection of more specific antigens for development of more specific serologic tests) and treatments (antimicrobial susceptibility testing) and from answering important questions about this pathogen (eg, what is T whippelii, a commensal intestinal organism or a saprobe [ie, an organism that lives in and derives its nourishment from organic matter in stagnant or foul water]? What are the differences in pathogenicity among various strains? Is the infection acquired primarily through the GI tract?). Furthermore, the 2 remaining Koch postulates are still to be fulfilled—the development of WD in an animal model infected with WD isolate and subsequent isolation of T whippelii from the animal. Morphology of T whippelii T whippelii has a specific morphology. The thick wall of this 1- to 2-mm rod gives it the appearance of encapsulation, and the inner layer is PAS positive. Stages of Whipple disease The clinical course of untreated WD can include the following 3 stages:
This proposed staging had at its base a limited review of 15 patients. This review also showed that 50% of patients had symptoms for more than 5 years before presentation. Patients with WD who were left untreated had a 5-year survival rate of 80% after onset of arthralgias, but only 20% of patients survived 5 years after onset of diarrhea or abdominal pain. FrequencyUnited StatesWhipple disease is a rare condition. No incidence and prevalence studies have been reported.
InternationalSeveral comprehensive reviews of the literature have been conducted over the years, and the number of approximate reported cases evolved as follows: 300 cases in 1983; 800 cases in 1996; and 1000 cases in 1998. This may represent an increase in the index of suspicion, availability of new diagnostic techniques, and population increase. These numbers still are believed to represent an underestimate of the disease frequency. Mortality/MorbidityWD left untreated is uniformly fatal.
RaceMost of the cases reported originated from Europe and North America, and some prior reports mentioned a preponderance of WD in white, middle-aged men. Still, the number of reported cases is too low to reveal any significant racial susceptibility. SexThe male-to-female ratio is 6-8:1. AgeOnset is usually in middle age (30-40 y). Age range at diagnosis reported in the literature is 3 months to 81 years. Please click here to view the full topic text: Whipple Disease |
| About Us | Privacy | Code of Ethics | Terms of Use | Contact Us | Advertising | Institutional Subscribers |
|
|
|||
|
| Medicine is a constantly changing science and not all therapies are clearly established. New research changes drug and treatment therapies daily. The authors, editors, and publisher of this journal have used their best efforts to provide information that is up-to-date and accurate and is generally accepted within medical standards at the time of publication. However, as medical science is constantly changing and human error is always possible, the authors, editors, and publisher or any other party involved with the publication of this article do not warrant the information in this article is accurate or complete, nor are they responsible for omissions or errors in the article or for the results of using this information. The reader should confirm the information in this article from other sources prior to use. In particular, all drug doses, indications, and contraindications should be confirmed in the package insert. FULL DISCLAIMER |