You are in: eMedicine Specialties > Cardiology > Coronary Artery Disease Acute Coronary SyndromesArticle Last Updated: Oct 8, 2008AUTHOR AND EDITOR INFORMATION
Author: Arun Kalyanasundaram, MD, MPH, Fellow, Department of Cardiology, Division of Medicine, Geisinger Medical Center Arun Kalyanasundaram is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Cardiology, American College of Physicians, Society of General Internal Medicine, Society of Hospital Medicine, and Southern Medical Association Coauthor(s): Jamshid Shirani, MD, FACC, FAHA, Consulting Staff, Director of Cardiovascular Fellowship Program, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Geisinger Medical Center Editors: Craig T Basson, MD, PhD, FAHA, FACC, Director, Cardiovascular Research, The New York Presbyterian Hospital; Professor, Greenberg Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University; Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine; Steven J Compton, MD, FACC, FACP, Director of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Alaska Heart Institute, Providence and Alaska Regional Hospitals; Amer Suleman, MD, Consultant in Electrophysiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Medical City Dallas Hospital; Eric H Yang, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Director of Coronary Care Unit, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine Author and Editor Disclosure Synonyms and related keywords: acute coronary syndrome, ACS, myocardial infarction, MI, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, STEMI, non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, NSTEMI, coronary artery disease, CAD, unstable angina, UA, transmural MI, nontransmural MI, subendocardial MI, cardiovascular disease, CVD, chronic heart failure, congestive heart failure, CHF, coronary heart disease, CHD INTRODUCTION
Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) refers to the spectrum of clinical presentations ranging from ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) to non–ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI) to unstable angina (UA, ie, ACS without release of enzymes or biomarkers of myocardial necrosis). In terms of pathology, ACS is almost always associated with rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque and partial or complete thrombosis of the infarct-related artery. However, in some instances, stable coronary artery disease (CAD) may result in ACS in the absence of plaque rupture and thrombosis when physiologic stress (eg, trauma, blood loss, anemia, infection, tachyarrhythmias) increases demands on the heart. The diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (MI) in this setting requires a finding of the typical rise and fall of biochemical markers of myocardial necrosis in addition to at least 1 of the following: ischemic symptoms, development of pathologic Q waves, ischemic ST-segment changes on ECG or in the setting of a coronary intervention. Therefore, presence of appropriate symptoms in temporal relation to rise and fall in cardiac enzymes constitutes acute MI even if typical ischemic ECG changes are absent. On the other hand, a minimal rise in troponin levels in a patient with renal failure is insufficient to diagnose acute MI if symptoms and/or ECG changes are absent. The terms transmural and nontransmural (subendocardial) MI are no longer used because ECG findings in patients with this condition are not closely correlated with pathologic changes in the myocardium. Therefore, a transmural infarct may occur in the absence of Q waves on ECGs, and many Q-wave MIs may be subendocardial, as noted on pathologic examination. Because elevation of the ST segment during ACS is correlated with coronary occlusion and because it affects the choice of therapy (urgent reperfusion therapy), ACS-related MI should be designated STEMI or NSTEMI. This article focuses on non–ST-elevation ACS. Patients with a new or presumed new left bundle-branch block are also excluded from the discussion below because they are regarded as having ST-elevation ACS and treated accordingly. Key points of discussion include the following:
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
Atherosclerosis is primarily responsible for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Most cases of ACS occur from disruption of a previously nonsevere lesion (an atherosclerotic lesion that was previously hemodynamically insignificant yet vulnerable to rupture). The vulnerable plaque is typified by a large lipid pool, numerous inflammatory cells, and a thin fibrous cap. New modalities, such as optical coherence tomography (OCT), palpography, and virtual histology, are being studied to identify vulnerable plaques. The major trigger for coronary thrombosis is considered to be plaque rupture caused by the dissolution of the fibrous cap due to the release of metalloproteinases (collagenases) from activated inflammatory cells. This event is followed by platelet activation and aggregation, activation of the coagulation pathway, and vasoconstriction. This process culminates in coronary intraluminal thrombosis and variable degrees of vascular occlusion. Distal embolization may occur. The severity and duration of coronary arterial obstruction, the volume of myocardium affected, the level of demand, and the ability of the rest of the heart to compensate are major determinants of a patient's clinical presentation and outcome. Demand influences ACS due to increased myocardial oxygen and nutrition requirements (such as exertion, emotional stress, or physiologic stress such as dehydration, blood loss, hypotension, infection, thyrotoxicosis, and surgery). Anemia and hypoxemia can precipitate myocardial ischemia in the absence of severe reduction in coronary artery blood flow. Elevated demand can produce ACS in the presence of a high-grade fixed coronary obstruction. ACS without elevation in demand requires a new impairment in supply, typically due to thrombosis and/or plaque hemorrhage. A syndrome consisting of chest pain, ischemic ST-segment and T-wave changes, elevated levels of biomarkers of myocyte injury, and transient left ventricular apical ballooning (takotsubo syndrome) has been shown to occur in the absence of clinical coronary artery disease, after emotional or physical stress. The pathogenesis of this syndrome is not well understood but is thought to relate to a surge of catechol stress hormones and/or high sensitivity to those hormones. Attention to the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms of ischemia is important when managing ACS. A simple predictor of demand is rate-pressure product, which can be lowered by beta blockers (eg, metoprolol or atenolol) and pain/stress relievers (eg, morphine), while supply may be improved by oxygen, adequate hematocrit, blood thinners (eg, heparin, IIb/IIIa agents such as abciximab, eptifibatide, tirofiban, or thrombolytics) and/or vasodilators (eg, nitrates, amlodipine). Recently, ranolazine was released as a new agent that slows fast channel activity in diastole and provides an additional means to treat angina, but it has risk of QT prolongation and its inclusion for ACS treatment did not reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events such as death, heart attack, or recurrent ischemia. FREQUENCY, MORTALITY AND MORBIDITY, SEX, AGE, AND RACE
Frequency In the United States, approximately 1.7 million cases of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) were diagnosed in 2001. Rates of first-listed admission diagnosis of unstable angina (UA) fell 87% from 29.7/10,000 in 1988 to 3.9/10,000 in 2001 for all age and sex groups, and rates of ACS as a primary diagnosis declined 44%. Mortality and morbidity CVD is the leading cause of death in the United States. Each year, approximately 500,000-700,000 deaths are attributed to CAD. About 13% of individuals with non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) ACS and 8% of those with UA who reach the hospital die within 6 months, according to the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE). In the same period, the rate of new stroke is 1.5-3%, and the rate of rehospitalization for a further ACS is 17-20%. Sex The incidence of ACS demonstrates a male predominance to approximately 70 years of age, when incidences converge in both sexes. Women are more likely than men to be older and to have more comorbid conditions at the time of first presentation. Abnormal locations of pain, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, dyspnea, and other atypical presentations are most common in women. Young women with ACS should be counseled regarding the potential teratogenic effect of statins. Hormonal replacement therapy with estrogen or progesterone) should be stopped in women who present with ACS. Age The incidence of ACS increases with age. Older patients with ACS are most likely to present with atypical symptoms. Many elderly patients with ACS do not receive evidence-based therapies. This situation emphasizes the importance of improving quality-of-care programs to reinforce the use of such therapies among elderly individuals. Race No racial predilection is observed. Racial disparities in treatment and outcome have been noted. HISTORY, PRESENTATION, PHYSICAL EXAMINATION, AND CAUSES
History Factors that predispose individuals to develop acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include the following:
Presentation Patients with ACS may present with a chief symptom of pain or discomfort in the chest or left arm, particularly if it reproduced previously documented angina. Principal presentations of unstable angina (UA) include the following findings:
Patients might also present with atypical symptoms, such as arm, jaw, neck, ear, or epigastric discomfort. When the symptoms are clearly related to exertion or stress or when they are promptly relieved with nitroglycerin, they could be anginal equivalents. Atypical presentations are common and frequently lead to misdiagnoses of abdominal pain, altered mental status, shock, or renal failure, for example. Physical examination Physical findings can vary from normal to any of the following:
Causes The most common cause of ACS is coronary thrombosis on a preexisting plaque. The degree of occlusion determines the patient's subsequent presentation. Risk factors for CAD include the following:
Other causes of non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) ACS include the following:
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSES AND OTHER PROBLEMS TO CONSIDER
Differential diagnoses Other problems to consider Acute cholecystitisHypertensive emergency Panic attack Pericarditis LABORATORY STUDIES
Electrocardiography Recording an ECG during an episode of the presenting symptoms is valuable. Transient ST-segment changes (>0.05 mV) that develop during a symptomatic period and that resolve when the symptoms do is strongly predictive of underlying CAD and has prognostic value. Comparison with previous ECGs is often helpful. Alternative causes of ST-segment and T-wave changes are left ventricular aneurysm, pericarditis, Prinzmetal angina, early repolarization, Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, drug therapy (eg, with tricyclic antidepressants, phenothiazines). Measurement of cardiac enzyme levels Measure cardiac enzyme levels at regular intervals, starting on admission and continuing until the peak is reached or until 3 sets of results are negative. Biochemical biomarkers are useful for both diagnosis and prognostication (see Media file 1). Of note, cardiac-specific troponins are not detectable in the blood of healthy individuals; therefore, they provide high specificity for detecting injury to cardiac myocytes. These molecules are also more sensitive than CK-MB for myocardial necrosis and, thus, improve early detection of small myocardial infarctions (MIs). Although blood troponin levels increase simultaneously with CK-MB levels (about 6 h after the onset of infarction), they remain elevated for as long as 2 weeks. As the result, troponin values cannot be used to diagnose reinfarction. New methods of detecting troponins in the blood can measure levels as low as 0.1-0.2 ng/mL. Minor elevations in these molecules can be detected in the blood of patients without acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the setting of myocarditis (pericarditis), sepsis, renal failure, acute congestive heart failure (CHF), acute pulmonary embolism, or prolonged tachyarrhythmias.
CBC determination The CBC helps in ruling out anemia as a secondary cause of ACS. Leukocytosis has prognostic value in the setting of acute MI. Basic metabolic panel Close monitoring of potassium and magnesium levels is important in patients with ACS because low levels may predispose them to ventricular arrhythmias. Routine measurement of serum potassium levels and prompt correction are recommended. A creatinine level is also needed, particularly if cardiac catheterization is considered. Use of N-acetylcysteine and adequate hydration can help prevent contrast material–induced nephropathy. New biomarkers Levels of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-pro-BNP) are elevated in acute MI and provide predictive information for risk stratification across the spectrum of ACS. In the future, a combination of levels of troponin (a biomarker of myocardial necrosis), NT-pro-BNP (an indicator of elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and wall stress), and C-reactive protein (CRP, an estimate of extent of systemic inflammation) may prove useful for predicting the outcome of patients with ACS. Routine measurement of BNP and CRP levels in patients with ACS is not warranted at this time. IMAGING STUDIES
Chest radiography Chest radiography helps in assessing cardiomegaly and pulmonary edema. A chest radiograph may also assist in diagnosing concomitant disease (eg, pneumonia in an elderly patient) as a precipitating cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Echocardiography An echocardiogram may play an important role in the setting of ACS. Regional wall-motion abnormalities can be identified. Echocardiograms are especially helpful if the diagnosis is questionable. An echocardiogram can also help in defining the extent of the infarction and assess overall function of the left and right ventricles. In addition, an echocardiogram can help identify complications such as acute mitral regurgitation, left ventricular rupture, and pericardial effusion. Absence of segmental wall-motion abnormality on echocardiography during active chest discomfort is a highly reliable indicator of a nonischemic origin of symptoms. Myocardial perfusion imaging Myocardial perfusion is a valuable method for triaging patients with chest pain in the emergency department. Myocardial perfusion imaging at rest is highly sensitive for detecting acute myocardial infarction (MI), and it can be supplemented with provocative testing after infarction is excluded. Results of clinical trials can be applied only in centers with proven reliability and experience. The sensitivity of single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is sufficient to detect infarcts of at least 10 g, but MRI with gadolinium enhancement may depict infarcts as small as 1–5 g. Cardiac angiography Cardiac catheterization helps in defining the patient's coronary anatomy and the extent of the disease. Patients with cardiogenic shock, intractable angina despite medication, severe pulmonary congestion, or right ventricular infarction should immediately undergo cardiac catheterization. For high-risk patients with ACS without persistent ST elevation, angiography with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition has been recommended. Most patients benefit from angiography when they have a TIMI risk score of less than 3 points (see Table). Table. TIMI Risk Score for Unstable Angina and STEMI1
Note—Event rates significantly increased as the TIMI risk score increased in the test cohort in the TIMI IIB study. Rates were 4.7% for a score of 0/1, 8.3% for 2, 13.2% for 3, 19.9% for 4, 26.2% for 5, and 40.9% for 6/7 (P < .001, χ2 test for the trend). The pattern of increasing event rates with increasing TIMI risk score was confirmed in all 3 validation groups (P < .001). After the diagnosis of ACS is established, risk stratification based on TIMI risk scores and the GRACE risk of death can be useful in making clinical decisions regarding the need for an invasive approach. Patients are at higher risk if the following findings are present:
MEDICAL CARE AND CORONARY INTERVENTIONS
Medical Care
Anti-ischemic therapy Nitrates do not improve mortality. However, they provide symptomatic relief by means of several mechanisms, including coronary vasodilation, improved collateral blood flow, decrease in preload (venodilation and reduced venous return), and decrease in afterload (arterial vasodilation). Care should be taken to avoid hypotension because this can potentially reduce coronary perfusion pressure (diastolic BP - left ventricular diastolic pressure). Beta-blockers are indicated in all patients unless they have the following contraindications:
Beta-blockers reduce oxygen demand and ventricular wall tension. They also decrease mortality and adverse cardiovascular events. These drugs may prevent mechanical complications of myocardial infarction (MI), including rupture of the papillary muscle, left ventricular free wall, and ventricular septum. Beta-blockers meliorate dynamic obstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract in patients with apical infarct and hyperdynamic basal segments. The most frequently used regimen is intravenous metoprolol 2-5 mg given every 5 minutes (up to 15 mg total) followed by 25-100 mg given orally twice a day. Beta-blockers should not be used acutely in patients with cardiogenic shock or signs of heart failure on presentation. Antithrombotic therapy Aspirin permanently impairs the cyclooxygenase pathway of thromboxane A2 production in platelets and, thus, inhibits platelet function. Aspirin reduces morbidity and mortality and is continued indefinitely. Clopidogrel (thienopyridine) inhibits adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP)–dependent activation of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa complex, a necessary step for platelet aggregation. This process results in intense inhibition of platelet function, particularly in combination with aspirin. In the Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Events (CURE) trial, thienopyridine reduced the rate of MI by 20%. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists include abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban. These drugs inhibit the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor, which is involved in the final common pathway for platelet adhesion and aggregation. Two trials with tirofiban and 1 trial with eptifibatide have also documented their efficacy in unstable angina (UA)/NSTEMI patients, only some of whom underwent interventions. These antagonists are a class I recommendation in patients where catheterization and PCI are planned. Intermediate- and high-risk patients appear to respond favorably to glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. They include patients with ST-segment depression, elevated risk scores, elevated serum troponin levels, and/or diabetes mellitus. Use eptifibatide or tirofiban in patients with high-risk features in whom invasive treatment is not planned. Anticoagulation Unfractionated heparin was associated with a 33% reduction in the risk of MI or death in patients with UA who were treated with aspirin plus heparin compared with aspirin alone. LMWHs might be superior to heparin in reducing cardiovascular outcomes with a safety profile similar to that of heparin in patients receiving medical care. Nine randomized trials have directly compared LMWH with unfractionated heparin. Two trials evaluated dalteparin, another evaluated nadroparin, and 6 evaluated enoxaparin. Heterogeneity of trial results has been observed. Trials with dalteparin and nadroparin reported similar rates of death or nonfatal MI compared with heparin, whereas 5 of 6 trials of enoxaparin found point estimates for death or nonfatal MI that favored enoxaparin over heparin. The benefit of enoxaparin appeared to be driven largely by a reduction in nonfatal MI, especially in the cohort of patients who had not received any open-label anticoagulant therapy before randomization. Thrombolysis Thrombolysis has no role in NSTEMI ACS. Coronary InterventionsAn early invasive strategy is indicated in UA/NSTEMI patients who have refractory angina or hemodynamic or electrical instability without serious comorbidities or contraindications to such procedures (Class I). An early invasive strategy is also indicated in initially stabilized UA/NSTEMI patients without serious comorbidities or contraindications to such procedures who have an elevated risk for clinical events (Class I). In NSTEMI ACS, early revascularization reduces MI and death rates compared with a more selective strategy, particularly in high-risk patients. Use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers followed by early invasive catheterization is the most logical approach. An early invasive strategy should be considered in patients with large MI, hypotension, shock, right ventricular infarction, and refractory chest pain. FURTHER PATIENT CARE
Consultations
Diet
Activity
Further inpatient care Patients may receive additional care in a telemetry-monitored unit if their condition is stable. Carefully monitor patients for arrhythmia, recurrent ischemia, and other possible complications. If patients have not undergone cardiac catheterization and if they have no complications, an ischemia-driven approach to PCI can be taken. Further outpatient care Arrange for follow-up within 2 weeks of the patient's discharge. Inpatient and outpatient medications
Transfer Patients with ACS with high-risk features should be transferred to a facility where catheterization is available. Start eptifibatide or tirofiban with other medical therapy, and transfer the patient to a facility where PCI can be performed. COMPLICATIONS AND PROGNOSIS
Complications Monitor and immediately treat arrhythmias in the first 48 hours. Pay attention to exacerbating factors, such as disturbances in electrolytes (especially potassium and magnesium), hypoxemia, drugs, or acidosis. Correct these factors accordingly. Recurrent ischemia may be due to incomplete reperfusion. In the setting of PCI, consider stent thrombosis as a possible cause. Whether drug-eluting stents have an increased rate of thrombosis compared with bare metal stents is unclear. CHF can be due to systolic dysfunction or diastolic dysfunction in the setting of MI. Aggressive treatment is indicated to prevent worsening of the situation. Cardiogenic shock is defined as a systolic BP less than 90 mm Hg in the presence of organ hypoperfusion. This finding is associated with a high mortality rate. Pressor agents, such as dopamine, and inotropic agents, such as dobutamine, may be needed. Some patients with intractable chest pain or severe hypotension may require the insertion of an intra-aortic balloon pump. The EuroHeart survey showed a nearly 40% reduction in the risk for death in patients with ACS who received support with an intra-aortic balloon pump. This benefit was independent of the status of the ST segment. Patients presenting with cardiogenic shock should undergo PCI as soon as possible. Prognosis Six-month mortality rates in the GRACE registry were 13% for patients with non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) ACS and 8% for those with UA. PATIENT EDUCATION
The mnemonic ABCDE might be helpful.
SPECIAL CONCERNS
MULTIMEDIA
REFERENCES
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||