Continually Updated Clinical Reference
 
 
  All Sources     eMedicine     Medscape     Drug Reference     MEDLINE
 
You are in: eMedicine Specialties > Medicine, Ob/Gyn, Psychiatry, and Surgery > Obstetrics/gynecology

Surgical Treatment of Vulvar Cancer

Last Updated: June 15, 2006
Email to a Colleague
Synonyms and related keywords: surgical treatment of vulvar cancer, carcinoma in situ of the vulva, vulvar CIS, Bowen disease, Bowen's disease, vulvar carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva, vulvar carcinoma, vulvectomy, vulvar malignancy, vulva cancer, vulva carcinoma, gynecologic cancer, gynecologic carcinoma, female genital cancer, human papilloma virus infection, HPV infection, sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, malignant fibrous histiocytoma, epithelioid sarcoma, basal cell carcinoma, verrucous carcinoma, Buschke-Lowenstein giant condyloma, adenocarcinoma

  AUTHOR INFORMATION Section 1 of 11    Click here to go to the next section in this topic
Author Information Introduction Indications Relevant Anatomy And Contraindications Workup Treatment Complications Outcome And Prognosis Future And Controversies Pictures Bibliography

Author: R Wendel Naumann, MD, Associate Director, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Carolinas Medical Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Coauthor(s): Robert V Higgins, MD, Vice-Chairman of Academic Affairs, Associate Director of Gynecologic Onc, Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UNC School of Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center; James Hall, MD, Director, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carolinas Medical Center, University of North Carolina

R Wendel Naumann, MD, is a member of the following medical societies: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Surgeons, North Carolina Medical Society, and Society of Gynecologic Oncologists

Editor(s): Serdar H Ural, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Director of High Risk Obstetrics Clinic and Conferences, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine; Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine; Michel E Rivlin, MD, Associate Professor, Coordinator, Quality Assurance /Quality Improvement, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Mississippi School of Medicine; Frederick B Gaupp, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Family Practice, Assumption Community Hospital; and Lee P Shulman, MD, Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University; Chief, Division of Reproductive Genetics, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prentice Women's Hospital, Northwestern Memorial Hospital

Disclosure


  INTRODUCTION Section 2 of 11   Click here to go to the previous section in this topic Click here to go to the top of this page Click here to go to the next section in this topic
Author Information Introduction Indications Relevant Anatomy And Contraindications Workup Treatment Complications Outcome And Prognosis Future And Controversies Pictures Bibliography

History of the Procedure: Before the development of radical surgery for vulvar carcinoma, the overall survival rate after surgical excision was poor. Basset first described a vulvectomy combined with a groin node dissection in 1912. However, in the first part of the 20th century, the long-term survival rate after surgery for vulvar cancer was still lower than 25%.

In an attempt to improve the cure rate for vulvar carcinoma, a more radical surgical approach was adopted. In England, Stanley Way championed radical excision of the primary lesion and removal of the lymph nodes through a single incision. Patients convalesced with their thighs flexed and legs tied together in an attempt to improve the primary wound healing rate after the operation.

Fred Taussig also amassed a large series of vulvar cancer cases from 1911-1940. Although he initially started his series with a radical excision of the primary tumor with an en bloc dissection of the lymph nodes, he later modified his technique to use 3 separate incisions, in a procedure similar to the one commonly used today.

Problem: Vulvar carcinoma encompasses any malignancy that arises in the skin; glands; or underlying stroma of the perineum, including the mons, labia minora, labia majora, Bartholin glands, or clitoris. Tumors can also arise in ectopic breast tissue that can be located in the vulva along the milk line. Metastatic tumors have also been described but occur relatively infrequently.

Frequency: Cancer of the vulva is the fourth most common malignancy of the female genital tract. It is estimated that there will be 3,870 cases of vulvar cancer in 2005 (Jemal, Murray, 2005). Currently, about 78% of vulvar carcinomas will be cured, making vulvar carcinoma responsible for about 900 deaths annually in the United States.

Unfortunately, the incidence of preinvasive disease of the vulva has almost doubled over the past decade, and this may translate into a marked increase in the incidence of invasive vulvar carcinoma in the future. Since vulvar cancer is rare and is not tracked by the World Health Organization, the global incidence of this disease is not precisely known.

Etiology: The incidence of vulvar carcinoma has a bimodal peak. Currently, development of vulvar carcinoma in situ in young women is suggested to correlate to human papillomavirus (HPV) infection (see Human Papillomavirus). In older women, the etiology of the carcinoma is attributed to chronic irritation or other poorly understood cofactors. Estimates indicate that women who smoke have a 4- to 5-fold increase in the incidence of carcinoma in situ of the vulva and a 20% increase in vulvar carcinoma. The incidence of vulvar carcinoma in situ and vulvar carcinoma is higher in women with multiple sexual partners and in women with a history of HPV infection. For women who report a history of genital warts or HPV-related disease, the relative risk for carcinoma in situ is 18.5 and for invasive cancer is 14.5.

Pathophysiology: The development of some vulvar dysplasia and cancer is related to HPV infection. Certain strains of HPV are known to be more oncogenic than others. HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 45, and 54 are more likely to be associated with cervical neoplasia and cancer and are suspected to also be responsible for vulvar cancers. The DNA from HPV 16 and 18 has been detected in up to 60% of vulvar cancers, a rate similar to that of cervical cancer.

The mechanism of HPV transformation into dysplasia and cancer is not well understood. Two gene products from HPV are known to immortalize cells in culture and are probably responsible for malignant transformation. The HPV E6 protein does have the ability to bind the host p53 protein. The HPV E7 protein binds the Rb gene product. The oncogenic viral types are thought to have a greater affinity for these cellular proteins, which would explain the increased risk of malignant transformation. Some infections may lead to integration of the viral DNA into the host, with disruption of the normal regulation of the E6 and E7 oncoproteins. This increased production of the E6 and E7 gene products could then result in oncogenic transformation.

Clinical: Diagnosis of vulvar carcinoma is often delayed significantly. Women neglect to seek treatment for an average of 6 months from the onset of symptoms. In addition, a delay in diagnosis often occurs after the patient presents to her physician. In many cases, a biopsy of the lesion is not performed until the problem fails to respond to numerous topical therapies. A biopsy should be performed when any discrete lesion of the vulva is discovered.

The most common presentation is a pruritic lesion of the vulva or a mass detected by the patient herself. However, early vulvar cancer may be asymptomatic and recognized only with careful inspection of the vulva. A biopsy should be performed on all visible lesions on the vulva. More advanced vulvar carcinomas present with bleeding, pain, or discharge.
  INDICATIONS Section 3 of 11   Click here to go to the previous section in this topic Click here to go to the top of this page Click here to go to the next section in this topic
Author Information Introduction Indications Relevant Anatomy And Contraindications Workup Treatment Complications Outcome And Prognosis Future And Controversies Pictures Bibliography

Choosing the proper surgical procedure is important. Undertake ablative procedures for a dysplastic lesion only if vulvar cancer can be excluded with reasonable certainty. Perform a wide local excision of the lesion if malignancy is a possibility.

For biopsy-proven squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva, assess the resectability of the lesion. If the lesion involves the upper urethra or anus or cannot be completely resected due to fixation to the pelvic bone, consider neoadjuvant radiation and chemotherapy prior to surgical intervention. This type of therapy can allow future resection with preservation of the urethral or rectal sphincter in most cases. Radiation can also be used in an attempt to spare the clitoris.

  RELEVANT ANATOMY AND CONTRAINDICATIONS Section 4 of 11   Click here to go to the previous section in this topic Click here to go to the top of this page Click here to go to the next section in this topic
Author Information Introduction Indications Relevant Anatomy And Contraindications Workup Treatment Complications Outcome And Prognosis Future And Controversies Pictures Bibliography

Relevant Anatomy: The vulva includes all external genital structures, including the mons pubis, labia majora, labia minora, clitoris, vaginal vestibule, perineum, and supporting structures exterior to the urogenital diaphragm.

The groin triangle is bounded by the inguinal ligament superiorly, the adductor longus medially, and the sartorius laterally. The superficial groin nodes lie above the cribriform fascia in the groin triangle. Careful dissection generally reveals 5 vessels in the groin triangle above the cribriform fascia, the largest of which is the saphenous vein. Often, a lateral accessory saphenous vein can be identified. The other vessels include the superficial circumflex, the superficial epigastric, and the external pudendal. Below the cribriform fascia are the deep inguinal nodes. Three to 4 nodes can be found medial to the femoral vein. The most superior of these is the sentinel node to the pelvic lymphatics and is known as the node of Cloquet.

The lymphatics of the vulva and distal third of the vagina drain into the superficial inguinal node group and travel through the deep femoral lymphatics and the node of Cloquet to the pelvic nodal groups (see Image 1). Direct spread to the deep nodal groups without metastasis to the superficial group has been documented using lymphatic mapping. This type of direct spread is uncommon and represents fewer than 5% of cases. Lymphatic mapping studies have also demonstrated that radioactive colloid injected into the vulva can accumulate more readily in the lateral external iliac nodes than in the medial group, which suggests that not all lymphatics flow to the medial pelvic nodes through the node of Cloquet. Studies suggest that 10-20% of lymphatic flow from the superficial node group travels directly to the pelvis without passage through the deep inguinal nodes. A direct pathway from the clitoris or vulva to the pelvic nodes has not been identified.

Contraindications: Because few alternatives to surgery are available for vulvar carcinoma, resection of the primary lesion should be attempted in most cases. Regional or general anesthesia can be used for this type of surgery. A combination of radiation and chemotherapy is an alternative to surgery. However, this regimen can have significant morbidity. For this reason, women who are not candidates for surgery are generally poor candidates for chemoradiation. The use of radiation alone can be used for palliation but should not be considered a curative treatment.

Quick Find
Author Information
Introduction
Indications
Relevant Anatomy And Contraindications
Workup
Treatment
Complications
Outcome And Prognosis
Future And Controversies
Pictures
Bibliography

Click for related images.

Patient Education



  WORKUP Section 5 of 11   Click here to go to the previous section in this topic Click here to go to the top of this page Click here to go to the next section in this topic
Author Information Introduction Indications Relevant Anatomy And Contraindications Workup Treatment Complications Outcome And Prognosis Future And Controversies Pictures Bibliography

Lab Studies:

  • Routine preoperative lab studies include serum electrolyte evaluations and a complete blood cell count.
  • No special testing is needed, except as indicated by the patient's medical condition.

Imaging Studies:

  • Imaging studies other than routine chest radiographs have not been helpful in the evaluation of women with vulvar carcinoma, except to evaluate specific symptoms or nodal enlargement.
  • A CT scan may be useful to help evaluate nodal spread in the pelvis in women with evidence of groin node metastasis, but the sensitivity of CT scanning to help detect pelvic lymphadenopathy is approximately 30%. Because of the low sensitivity of imaging in detecting pelvic node metastasis, some authors have suggested laparoscopic assessment of the pelvic lymph nodes as an alternative.
  • MRI can be used to evaluate lymphatic spread but is of limited use because of the expense and the difficulty of evaluating the pelvic nodal group.
  • Positron emission tomography (PET) scanning holds some promise in improving the sensitivity of detecting small nodal metastasis. However, no report is currently available that documents the sensitivity or specificity of PET scan findings in persons with vulvar carcinoma.

Other Tests:

  • Perform an ECG prior to surgery, if indicated.
  • Pulmonary function tests may be appropriate in women who smoke and are older than 50 years to help in perioperative management. Evaluation should also include an arterial blood gas analysis.

Diagnostic Procedures:

  • Colposcopy can be performed on the vulva but is more difficult than colposcopy of the cervix because of the large surface area of the vulva and the variability in premalignant lesions. Because of the keratinized skin, acetic acid should be placed for at least 5 minutes prior to colposcopy. To facilitate biopsy, EMLA (ie, eutectic mixture of local anesthetics) cream may be applied to ameliorate the pain from lidocaine injection. A punch biopsy tool can be used to take a representative sample of the vulva. A biopsy should be performed on all lesions to ensure that a cancer is not missed when multiple dysplastic lesions are present.
Histologic Findings: Squamous carcinoma is the most common pathologic type of vulvar carcinoma. Various grading systems are described and may be prognostic. Other prognostic features include confluent growth patterns and lymph vascular involvement.

Melanoma accounts for approximately 10% of vulvar cancers. The staging and treatment is similar to other melanomas. Clark defined a classification system that describes prognosis based on invasion of melanoma to certain tissue levels. This system has been modified by Chung for use in vulvar melanoma. Similarly, the depth of invasion, as described by Breslow, can be used to predict prognosis.

Sarcoma is relatively uncommon. Subtypes include leiomyosarcoma, malignant fibrous histiocytoma, and epithelioid sarcoma. In addition, a sarcoma can arise from any structure in the vulva; including blood vessels, skeletal muscle, and fat.

Basal cell carcinoma of the vulva is uncommon, but it can occur in elderly women. As with other basal cell carcinomas, local excision is usually curative.

Verrucous carcinoma resembles condylomata acuminata and is also called a Buschke-Lowenstein giant condyloma. This type of carcinoma is locally aggressive but does not have a propensity to spread via lymphatics. These tumors are thought to be associated with HPV type 6.

Adenocarcinoma may arise in the Bartholin gland, and it represents approximately 40% of tumor types from this location. This type of tumor may attain considerable size before detection. Removal of the Bartholin gland to exclude an underlying carcinoma is indicated for recurrent Bartholin gland abscesses or cysts or if asymptomatic enlargement occurs in persons older than 50 years.

Paget disease usually manifests as a red, raised, pruritic lesion. Histologically, the lesion is noted to contain cells with prominent nuclei and an increased amount of cytoplasm. Paget disease has been associated with underlying adenocarcinoma of the colon or sweat glands in 15% of cases. Although Paget disease does not metastasize, because the histologic changes often extend past the gross extent on the skin, it is known to have a high rate of local recurrence. For this reason, a clinical margin of 2 cm is recommended at the time of excision.

Other carcinomas of the vulva are rare. Tumors can occur in the apocrine sweat glands, and breast carcinoma can also develop from ectopic breast tissue contained within the milk line that extends down into the vulva.

Staging: Because the results of clinical assessment of lymph node status are inaccurate, both the International Federation of Gynecology (FIGO) and the American Joint Commission on Cancer Staging have adopted surgical staging systems for vulvar carcinoma that take into account the pathologic status of the inguinal lymph nodes.

The depth of invasion is usually measured from the deepest point of invasion to the basement membrane of the most superficial adjacent dermal papillae. When defining microinvasive disease, many use this measurement. However, one should use care when interpreting the pathologic measurements because some studies use tumor thickness, which is measured from the deepest invasion to the surface of the skin or tumor.

  • FIGO staging of vulvar carcinoma (1995)
    • Stage 0 - Carcinoma in situ

    • Stage I - Confined to the vulva, smaller than or equal to 2 cm in greatest dimension

      • Stage IA - Invasion of less than or equal to 1 mm in depth

      • Stage IB - Invasion of more than 1 mm in depth
    • Stage II - Tumor confined to the vulva or perineum, larger than 2 cm

    • Stage III - Tumor of any size with positive findings from ipsilateral lymph nodes or invasion of the vagina, anus, or to lower two thirds of the urethra

    • Stage IV - Spread beyond the vulva

      • Stage IVA - Invasion of the upper third of the urethra, bladder mucosa, rectal mucosa, or pelvic bone or bilateral lymph node involvement

      • Stage IVB - Any distant metastasis, including pelvic lymph nodes
  • American Joint Commission on Cancer staging of vulvar carcinoma (1992)
    • Primary tumor (T)

      • TX - Primary tumor cannot be assessed

      • T0 - No evidence of primary tumor

      • TIS - Carcinoma in situ

      • T1 - Tumor confined to the vulva or to the vulva and perineum, smaller than or equal to 2 cm in greatest dimension

      • T2 - Tumor confined to the vulva and perineum, larger than 2 cm in greatest dimension

      • T3 - Tumor invasion into lower two thirds of the urethra, vagina, or anus

      • T4 - Tumor invades bladder mucosa, upper urethral mucosa, or rectal mucosa, or is fixed to the pelvic bone
    • Regional lymph node (N)

      • NX - Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed

      • N0 - No regional lymph node metastasis

      • N1 - Unilateral regional lymph node metastasis

      • N2 - Bilateral regional lymph node metastasis

    • Distant metastasis (M)

      • MX - Presence of distant metastasis cannot be assessed

      • M0 - No distant metastasis

      • M2 - Distant metastasis (including pelvic lymph nodes)
    • Staging groups

      • Stage 0 - Tis, N0, and M0

      • Stage I - T1, N0, and M0

      • Stage II - T2, N0, and M0

      • Stage III - T1/T2, N1, and M0 or T3, N0/N1, and M0

      • Stage IVA - T4, N (any), and M0 or T (any), N2, and M0

      • Stage IVB - T (any), N (any), and M

  TREATMENT Section 6 of 11   Click here to go to the previous section in this topic Click here to go to the top of this page Click here to go to the next section in this topic
Author Information Introduction Indications Relevant Anatomy And Contraindications Workup Treatment Complications Outcome And Prognosis Future And Controversies Pictures Bibliography

Medical therapy: Neoadjuvant therapy may be considered for tumors that manifest with bowel or bladder involvement that would require extensive or exenterative surgery. The Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) reported its experience with a combination of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil with hyperfractionated radiation for patients with unresectable stage III or stage IV squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. After chemotherapy and radiation, 71 of 73 women were candidates for surgery and almost half had no visible disease. Urinary and fecal continence was preserved in all but 3 of these women.

Except in the neoadjuvant setting, chemotherapy for vulvar carcinoma is palliative and often ineffective. Only bleomycin has been reported to produce a complete clinical response. In a series of 11 patients, Trope and colleagues administered bleomycin at a dose of 15 mg twice weekly and noted 2 complete responses (19%) and 3 partial responses (27%), for a total response rate of 46%.

The only other agent that has been reported to be effective in recurrent vulvar cancer is doxorubicin. Deppe et al reported a partial response in 3 of 4 patients treated at a dose of 45 mg/m2.

Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) have been used in the neoadjuvant setting but have not been studied extensively in recurrent vulvar cancer. However, due to a lack of effective chemotherapy agents, these drugs are often used in recurrent ovarian cancer.

Surgical therapy: Great effort has been devoted to decreasing the morbidity of surgery for vulvar carcinoma. Traditional surgery has been a large en bloc resection of the vulva with the superficial and deep inguinal nodes through a single incision with at least 2-cm margins around the tumor and deep resection to the genitourinary diaphragm (see Images 3-4). Not only did this procedure carry significant surgical morbidity, it was often disfiguring and distressing to the patient.

Refinements to surgery include (1) a definition for microinvasive carcinoma that does not require radical dissection or inguinal node dissection, (2) limiting the inguinal node dissection to one side in early tumors, (3) using a triple-incision technique instead of an en bloc approach, (4) using radical local resection with 1-cm margins instead of complete vulvectomy, and (5) sparing the saphenous vein in an attempt to prevent lymphedema.

Many gynecologic oncologists have also omitted dissection of the deep inguinal lymph nodes, although this is controversial. In an attempt to decrease the morbidity from inguinal node dissection, radiation alone has been used to treat the groin lymph nodes but was shown to be inferior to groin node dissection. Sentinel lymph node dissection is currently being studied and may eventually replace routine groin node dissection.

The initial proposal for microinvasive lesions was a depth of 5 mm for tumors smaller than 2 cm. However, the risk of groin node metastasis in lesions with 3-5 mm of invasion was noted to possibly be as high as 20%. It was later determined that women with 1-mm invasion or less had a negligible chance of node metastasis and could be treated with wide local excision with a 1-cm clinical margin around the tumor. A GOG study suggested that women with well-differentiated tumors up to 2 mm in depth had a very low risk of lymph node metastasis. Omitting the groin node dissection in women with 1-2 mm of invasion can be considered if the tumor is well differentiated and the patient is elderly, debilitated, or at significant risk of lymphedema.

  • The risk of lymph node metastasis based on the depth of invasion

    • Invasion to less than or equal to 1 mm - 0% (n = 34)

    • Invasion to 1.1-2 mm - 10% (n = 19)

    • Invasion to 2.1-3 mm - 12% (n = 17)

    • Invasion to 3.1-5 mm - 14% (n = 7)

    • Invasion to deeper than 5 mm - 43% (n = 7)

In stage I lesions, 0 of 177 patients had positive findings from contralateral groin nodes when the ipsilateral node findings were negative and the lesion was not located in the midline. Therefore, contralateral groin node dissection has been omitted when patients present with a primary lesion smaller than 2 cm and have negative ipsilateral lymph node findings.

Since the early part of the 20th century, the traditional surgery has been a radical dissection of the primary lesion with a bilateral groin node dissection performed through a single incision. Although this technique was later modified to remove less skin, the primary wound breakdown rate exceeded 50%. Taussig eventually adopted a triple-incision technique in response to the high wound breakdown rate. Concern was raised over the triple-incision technique because of the possibility of residual disease in the "skin bridges" due to cancer cells in the lymphatics between the primary tumor and the lymph nodes. Hacker et al reported a series of 100 patients who had undergone surgery with a triple-incision technique and reported a 56% primary healing rate. Although 2 patients had metastasis in the skin bridge, neither of these instances were isolated metastasis.

Helm et al reported findings when comparing the cases of 32 women treated with a single incision with 32 similar patients treated with a triple incision. Patients with a triple incision had a significantly shorter operative time, less blood loss, and a shorter hospital stay. No difference was observed in the overall survival or recurrence rate between the 2 groups, and none of the women in the triple-incision group developed skin bridge metastasis. The biggest difference in the 2 groups was that the single-incision group had a 19% complete wound-breakdown rate, compared to only 3% for the triple-incision group. Similar results have been noted for women with larger lesions.

A less-radical approach was adopted following the discovery that the local recurrence risk was low when the pathologic margin around the primary lesion was 8 mm. When taking into account the shrinkage during tissue fixation, this translates to a 1-cm clinical margin. Deep dissection to the urogenital diaphragm is performed, but most of the vulva can be spared if the primary lesion is small.

The traditional description of a groin node dissection includes ligation of the saphenous vein during removal of the superficial groin lymphatics. A review of 139 cases of groin node dissection demonstrated that when the saphenous vein was preserved, the incidence of wound cellulitis and acute and chronic lymphedema was significantly lower. Only one patient in this series with saphenous vein preservation developed chronic lymphedema. This occurred in a patient who received postoperative radiation therapy. No evidence indicated that an attempt to save the saphenous vein significantly increased blood loss or operative time.

Use of radiation alone to treat the groin lymphatics would eliminate the need for surgery and the resulting morbidity of groin node dissection. The GOG performed a study on the efficacy of groin irradiation compared to surgery. Women with clinically negative findings from groin nodes were randomized to radiation alone or lymphadenectomy with radiation when the groin node findings were pathologically positive. The study was closed prematurely because an interim analysis demonstrated a significant decrease in survival in women receiving only groin irradiation. However, the radiation technique used in the study has been severely criticized. The prescribed dose of radiation was at 3 cm, regardless of body habitus or the actual groin node location. Studies of CT scan data have demonstrated that this technique delivers 100% of the prescribed dose to only 18% of women, and fewer than half the women would have received more than 60% of the prescribed dose to the entire groin lymphatic area.

Some physicians now omit deep groin node dissection. Opening the femoral sheath and removing the deep nodes is not without morbidity. Deep lymph node dissection may increase the incidence of lymphedema. In addition, infection of the groin over the femoral vessels after deep groin dissection can result in catastrophic bleeding. The sartorius muscle can be divided and transposed to cover the dissection bed to help protect the groin vessels after deep groin node dissection. The rationale for removing only the superficial nodes is that they act as a sentinel group for the deep nodes.

Several authors have examined the incidence of unexpected groin failure in the presence of pathologically negative superficial lymph node findings. The incidence rate of unanticipated failure is approximately 3-4%. These percentages match those of an older series by Stanley Way, in which he examined both nodal groups separately and found that the deep nodes (deep femoral and pelvic) were involved in only approximately 3% of cases when the superficial lymph node findings were negative. He later adopted a technique of using the deep inguinal nodes to predict the need for pelvic lymph node dissection but continued to remove both the superficial and deep inguinal nodes. A survey of a group of gynecologic oncologists found that fewer than 25% of respondents still perform deep inguinal node dissection.

Intraoperative details: Surgery for vulvar carcinoma is often performed with the woman's legs in adjustable stirrups to facilitate both the groin node dissection and the perineal phase of the operation. A surgical team can greatly reduce operative time. After the patient is prepared and draped, make an incision approximately 2 cm below the inguinal ligament. The tissue is undermined below the Scarpa fascia. Carry the dissection down to the tensor fasciae latae. Then, dissect the superficial inguinal nodal group off the cribriform fascia, taking care to not injure the great saphenous vein.

If the deep nodes are to be dissected, open the cribriform fascia laterally and take it as part of the specimen. Then, dissect the femoral vein free and remove the nodes from the medial portion of the femoral vein. After a deep groin node dissection, the sartorius muscle can be divided at its insertion on the anterior iliac spine and sutured to the inguinal ligament to cover the femoral vessels. Bring closed suction drains in through a separate incision and suture to the skin. Close Scarpa fascia with 3-0 absorbable sutures, and close the skin with mattress sutures or with staples.

For the vulvectomy, outline the lesion and make an incision to encompass 1-cm margins around the tumor. In contrast to a simple vulvectomy, the dissection is carried deep to the perineal membrane. Care must be taken at the posterior aspects of the incision where the pudendal vessels enter the vulva. The lower portion of the bulbocavernosus muscle should be clamped and ligated to prevent bleeding. Once the lesion is removed, the vagina and vulvar skin can be mobilized to reduce the tension on the incision. It is closed in layers with absorbable suture, and the skin is closed with horizontal or vertical mattress sutures. The authors' preference is to use 2-0 polyglycolic acid for the mattress sutures and to reinforce the incision with a running 3-0 polyglycolic acid suture.

Postoperative details: After surgery, recommend frequent sitz baths. Patients should dry the vulva completely after each sitz bath. A Foley catheter may be needed for a prolonged period after surgery around the urethra. Heparin or pneumatic compression stockings should be used in all women to prevent postoperative venous thrombosis. Place drains at the time of lymphadenectomy because of the flow through the groin lymphatics. Leave these drains in place until drainage is approximately 25 mL or less per day. In many cases, this may take more than 2 weeks.

Follow-up care: Although surgery for vulvar carcinoma is often curative, it can be disfiguring and may significantly impact sexual function. This type of surgery can have serious psychological sequela, even in the absence of a functional problem after surgery. Sexual dysfunction seems to be related to a disturbance in body image, leading to hypoactive sexual disorder and aversion disorder. Depression and increasing age are risk factors for sexually active women to discontinue intercourse after surgery. Interestingly, few studies have been able to correlate sexual dysfunction with extent of surgery if the clitoris was preserved.

Women who have positive findings from more than one node are likely to benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy to the inguinal and pelvic nodes. The GOG studied the use of pelvic node dissection instead of pelvic and groin radiation and found that radiation was superior. A clear benefit for radiation has not been proven in women with positive microscopic findings from one node, but, because groin recurrence is almost universally fatal, adjuvant radiation is often recommended.

Monitor patients closely after treatment for vulvar carcinoma. Examinations every 3 months for the first 2 years are often recommended because more than two thirds of recurrences are in this time period. Detection of local recurrence of vulvar carcinoma is important because it can be treated by radical surgical excision.

The long-term survival rate after radical excision of a vulvar recurrence has been reported as 50-60%. Survival is better in women who originally presented with early-stage disease. Other factors that diminish the cure rate after local recurrence include disease at sites other than the vulva and a short interval from initial treatment to recurrence. For a large recurrence, an exenterative procedure can be attempted. A long-term survival rate of 38% has been reported after exenterative surgery for vulvar carcinoma.

Resection of a groin recurrence is not usually recommended. Often, this area heals slowly if radiation has already been used. Generally, the procedure should not be considered curative. The only situation in which resection of a groin node recurrence should be attempted is if the groin node is an isolated recurrence and the patient has not been previously irradiated.

Positive groin nodes at the time of initial surgery increase the risk of recurrence in the groin in the first 2 years. After the first 2 years, the risk of groin recurrence is low, regardless of the status of the nodes at the time of the initial surgery. It has been noted that the risk of local failure on the vulva is elevated for many years after the surgery. A report from the Mayo clinic showed that up to 10% of patients treated for vulvar cancer had a local recurrence more than 5 years after the original diagnosis.

For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Cancer and Tumors Center and Procedures Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education articles Colposcopy and Cervical Cancer.

  COMPLICATIONS Section 7 of 11   Click here to go to the previous section in this topic Click here to go to the top of this page Click here to go to the next section in this topic
Author Information Introduction Indications Relevant Anatomy And Contraindications Workup Treatment Complications Outcome And Prognosis Future And Controversies Pictures Bibliography

Lymphocyst formation is noted in 7-19% of patients after groin lymphadenectomy. Although cellulitis after vulvectomy has been associated with an increase in the incidence of lymphedema, it has not been associated with an increase in lymphocyst formation. Do not remove drains after inguinal node dissection until the daily output of the drain is less than 25 mL.

Lymphocysts usually manifest as an asymptomatic mass in the groin. Send aspiration samples of the cyst for cytologic evaluation to exclude a groin recurrence. Multiple aspirations are often required and may not be curative. If the mass is symptomatic, the lymphocyst can be removed surgically. However, in one small series, lymphocysts were successfully treated by placing a drain in the groin until the output was less than 25 mL/d. The drain was then removed and a pressure dressing was placed to prevent reaccumulation of the fluid. Sclerosis of lymphocysts with Betadine solution has also been described.

Cellulitis and lymphangitis can occur after groin node dissection. The incidence rate of cellulitis requiring antibiotics ranges from 20-40%. Often, patients who develop lymphocysts are at increased risk of lymphangitis. The etiologic agent is most often a streptococcal species, and treatment with penicillin is adequate. If drains are still in place, first-generation cephalosporins may be more appropriate to cover Staphylococcus aureus.

Chronic lymphedema has been reported in 10-20% of women after groin node dissection. This can be a disabling problem and is more common if radiation is required after groin dissection. Limiting groin node dissection in women with early cancers and preserving the saphenous vein decreases the incidence of this problem. The use of graduated compression stockings after lymphadenectomy can help prevent lymphedema. If edema does develop, the use of compression stockings, massage therapy, and limb wraps can help control the accumulation of fluid. However, lymphedema can be chronic and disabling in severe cases. Many major centers offer lymphedema treatment programs.

  OUTCOME AND PROGNOSIS Section 8 of 11   Click here to go to the previous section in this topic Click here to go to the top of this page Click here to go to the next section in this topic
Author Information Introduction Indications Relevant Anatomy And Contraindications Workup Treatment Complications Outcome And Prognosis Future And Controversies Pictures Bibliography

Overall survival for patients with vulvar carcinoma is excellent, especially in those with early-stage disease. Experience with modern treatment from the Mayo clinic shows that the overall survival rate for women with vulvar carcinoma is 75%, compared to an 89% actuarial survival rate for age-matched controls. The 5-year survival rates after surgery for vulvar cancer are as follows:

  FUTURE AND CONTROVERSIES Section 9 of 11   Click here to go to the previous section in this topic Click here to go to the top of this page Click here to go to the next section in this topic
Author Information Introduction Indications Relevant Anatomy And Contraindications Workup Treatment Complications Outcome And Prognosis Future And Controversies Pictures Bibliography

Vaccines are being developed against HPV using viruslike particles (VLPs) comprised of the L1 capsid protein. This vaccine is current in clinical trials and should be available sometime in 2006. This vaccine has been highly effective in preventing abnormal cervical smears caused by HPV strains 6, 11, 16, and 18. Assuming that this vaccine may also be protective against HPV-related vulvar dysplasia and vulvar cancer is reasonable.

Based on work in breast cancer and melanoma, a sentinel lymph node can be identified and can be predictive of patients who will have other involved nodes. The technique of sentinel lymph node dissection is attractive in vulvar carcinoma since most women will have negative lymph nodes. If the sentinel node dissection proves to be sufficiently sensitive, full groin node dissection could be limited only to women with positive lymph nodes. Currently, only a few early reports document the efficacy of this technique. A sentinel node can be identified in approximately 85% of women with isosulfan blue dye and 100% with the injection of Tc-99 labeled albumin. Early reports examining the sensitivity of this technique appear promising. The Gynecologic Oncology Group is currently studying the feasibility and the sensitivity of sentinel lymph node dissection in women with vulvar carcinoma.

The combination of chemotherapy with radiation in cervical cancer has produced marked improvement in survival for locally advanced disease. This concept appears to also be effective in locally advanced vulvar carcinoma. Chemotherapy combined with radiation also may improve the cure rate in women with positive groin node findings, but acceptance of routine chemoradiation in women with positive node findings will probably require prospective evaluation.

  PICTURES Section 10 of 11   Click here to go to the previous section in this topic Click here to go to the top of this page Click here to go to the next section in this topic
Author Information Introduction Indications Relevant Anatomy And Contraindications Workup Treatment Complications Outcome And Prognosis Future And Controversies Pictures Bibliography

Caption: Picture 1. Surgical treatment of vulvar cancer. Diagram of lymphatic drainage of a lateral lesion. Most lymphatics flow through the superficial inguinal nodes, deep inguinal nodes, and the node of Cloquet to the pelvic lymph node chains. Deep inguinal node findings are positive approximately 3% of the time when superficial inguinal node findings are negative. Lymphatic mapping studies indicate that 13% of cases demonstrate findings consistent with flow to the pelvis that does not involve the node of Cloquet. If the lesion is in the anterior labia minor, then contralateral flow is demonstrated in 67% of cases.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Picture Type: Photo
Caption: Picture 2. Surgical treatment of vulvar cancer. A large T2 carcinoma of the vulva crossing the midline and involving the clitoris. (Photograph courtesy of Tom Wilson)
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Picture Type: CT
Caption: Picture 3. Surgical treatment of vulvar cancer. Specimen after removal with at least 1 cm margins around the tumor. (Photograph courtesy of Tom Wilson)
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Picture Type: Photo
Caption: Picture 4. Surgical Treatment of Vulvar Cancer. The surgical defect after a radical vulvectomy specimen is removed. (Photograph courtesy of Tom Wilson)
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Picture Type: Photo
Caption: Picture 5. Surgical treatment of vulvar cancer. The surgical defect is closed after a radical vulvectomy. (Photograph courtesy of Tom Wilson)
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Picture Type: Photo
Caption: Picture 6. Surgical treatment of vulvar cancer. A large squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. Note the small contralateral “kissing lesion” that can be seen with vulvar carcinomas. (Photograph courtesy of James B. Hall, MD)
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Picture Type: Photo
Caption: Picture 7. Surgical treatment of vulvar cancer. A specimen from a traditional single-incision radical hysterectomy. Most radical vulvectomies are now performed through 3 incisions, with the groin nodes removed separately from the vulvectomy specimen. (Photograph courtesy of James B. Hall, MD)
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Picture Type: Photo
Caption: Picture 8. Surgical treatment of vulvar cancer. Closure of a large single-incision radical vulvectomy. The complete wound breakdown rate from this procedure is often greater than 50%. (Photograph courtesy of James B. Hall, MD)
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Picture Type: Photo
Caption: Picture 9. Surgical treatment of vulvar cancer. A specimen from a primary exenteration for a stage IVA vulvar cancer involving the rectum. Many of these large tumors are now treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation prior to surgery, with preservation of rectal sphincter function. (Photograph courtesy of James B. Hall, MD)
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Picture Type: Photo
  BIBLIOGRAPHY Section 11 of 11   Click here to go to the previous section in this topic Click here to go to the top of this page
Author Information Introduction Indications Relevant Anatomy And Contraindications Workup Treatment Complications Outcome And Prognosis Future And Controversies Pictures Bibliography

  • Abitbol MM: Carcinoma of the vulva: improvements in the surgical approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1973 Oct 15; 117(4): 483-9[Medline].
  • Basset A: Traitement chirurgical operatoire de l'epithelima primitif du clitoris indications-technique-resultats. Rev Chir 1912; 46: 546.
  • Bauer HM, Ting Y, Greer CE, et al: Genital human papillomavirus infection in female university students as determined by a PCR-based method. JAMA 1991 Jan 23-30; 265(4): 472-7[Medline].
  • Berman ML, Soper JT, Creasman WT, et al: Conservative surgical management of superficially invasive stage I vulvar carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 1989 Dec; 35(3): 352-7[Medline].
  • Breslow A: Thickness, cross-sectional areas and depth of invasion in the prognosis of cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg 1970 Nov; 172(5): 902-8[Medline].
  • Brinton LA, Nasca PC, Mallin K, et al: Case-control study of cancer of the vulva. Obstet Gynecol 1990 May; 75(5): 859-66[Medline].
  • Burke TW, Levenback C, Coleman RL, et al: Surgical therapy of T1 and T2 vulvar carcinoma: further experience with radical wide excision and selective inguinal lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol 1995 May; 57(2): 215-20[Medline].
  • Christopherson W, Buchsbaum HJ, Voet R, Lifschitz S: Radical vulvectomy and bilateral groin lymphadenectomy utilizing separate groin incisions: report of a case with recurrence in the intervening skin bridge. Gynecol Oncol 1985 Jun; 21(2): 247-51[Medline].
  • Chung AF, Woodruff JM, Lewis JL Jr: Malignant melanoma of the vulva: A report of 44 cases. Obstet Gynecol 1975 Jun; 45(6): 638-46[Medline].
  • Clark WH Jr, From L, Bernardino EA, Mihm MC: The histogenesis and biologic behavior of primary human malignant melanomas of the skin. Cancer Res 1969 Mar; 29(3): 705-27[Medline].
  • Decesare SL, Fiorica JV, Roberts WS, et al: A pilot study utilizing intraoperative lymphoscintigraphy for identification of the sentinel lymph nodes in vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1997 Sep; 66(3): 425-8[Medline].
  • Deppe G, Bruckner HW, Cohen CJ: Adriamycin treatment of advanced vulvar carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 1977 Jul; 50(1 Suppl): 13s-14s[Medline].
  • Gonzalez Bosquet J, Magrina JF, Gaffey TA: Long-term survival and disease recurrence in patients with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. Gynecol Oncol 2005 Jun; 97(3): 828-33[Medline].
  • Gonzalez Bosquet J, Magrina JF, Gaffey TA: Long-term survival and disease recurrence in patients with primary squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. Gynecol Oncol 2005 Jun; 97(3): 828-33[Medline].
  • Green MS, Naumann RW, Elliot M, et al: Sexual dysfunction following vulvectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2000 Apr; 77(1): 73-7[Medline].
  • Greenlee RT, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA: Cancer statistics, 2000. CA Cancer J Clin 2000 Jan-Feb; 50(1): 7-33[Medline].
  • Hacker NF, Berek JS, Lagasse LD, et al: Individualization of treatment for stage I squamous cell vulvar carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 1984 Feb; 63(2): 155-62[Medline].
  • Hacker NF, Leuchter RS, Berek JS, et al: Radical vulvectomy and bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy through separate groin incisions. Obstet Gynecol 1981 Nov; 58(5): 574-9[Medline].
  • Hacker NF, Berek JS, Lagasse LD: Microinvasive carcinoma of the vulva. Obstet Gynecol 1983 Jul; 62(1): 134-5[Medline].
  • Heaps JM, Fu YS, Montz FJ, et al: Surgical-pathologic variables predictive of local recurrence in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. Gynecol Oncol 1990 Sep; 38(3): 309-14[Medline].
  • Helm CW, Hatch K, Austin JM, et al: A matched comparison of single and triple incision techniques for the surgical treatment of carcinoma of the vulva. Gynecol Oncol 1992 Aug; 46(2): 150-6[Medline].
  • Homesley HD, Bundy BN, Sedlis A, et al: Assessment of current International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging of vulvar carcinoma relative to prognostic factors for survival (a Gynecologic Oncology Group study). Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991 Apr; 164(4): 997-1003; discussion 1003-4[Medline].
  • Homesley HD, Bundy BN, Sedlis A, Adcock L: Radiation therapy versus pelvic node resection for carcinoma of the vulva with positive groin nodes. Obstet Gynecol 1986 Dec; 68(6): 733-40[Medline].
  • Hopkins MP, Reid GC, Morley GW: The surgical management of recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. Obstet Gynecol 1990 Jun; 75(6): 1001-5[Medline].
  • Iversen T, Aas M: Lymph drainage from the vulva. Gynecol Oncol 1983 Oct; 16(2): 179-89[Medline].
  • Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E: Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin 2005 Jan-Feb; 55(1): 10-30[Medline].
  • Kelley JL 3rd, Burke TW, Tornos C, et al: Minimally invasive vulvar carcinoma: an indication for conservative surgical therapy. Gynecol Oncol 1992 Mar; 44(3): 240-4[Medline].
  • Klemm P, Marnitz S, Köhler C: Clinical implication of laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with vulvar cancer and positive groin nodes. Gynecol Oncol 2005 Oct; 99(1): 101-5[Medline].
  • Leminen A, Forss M, Paavonen J: Wound complications in patients with carcinoma of the vulva. Comparison between radical and modified vulvectomies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000 Dec; 93(2): 193-7[Medline].
  • Levenback C, Morris M, Burke TW, et al: Groin dissection practices among gynecologic oncologists treating early vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1996 Jul; 62(1): 73-7[Medline].
  • Lorincz AT, Reid R, Jenson AB, et al: Human papillomavirus infection of the cervix: relative risk associations of 15 common anogenital types. Obstet Gynecol 1992 Mar; 79(3): 328-37[Medline].
  • McCall AR, Olson MC, Potkul RK: The variation of inguinal lymph node depth in adult women and its importance in planning elective irradiation for vulvar cancer. Cancer 1995 May 1; 75(9): 2286-8[Medline].
  • Menczer J, Fintsi Y, Arbel-Alon S: The presence of HPV 16, 18 and p53 immunohistochemical staining in tumor tissue of Israeli Jewish women with cervical and vulvar neoplasia. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2000; 21(1): 30-4[Medline].
  • Miller B, Morris M, Levenback C, et al: Pelvic exenteration for primary and recurrent vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol 1995 Aug; 58(2): 202-5[Medline].
  • Moore DH, Thomas GM, Montana GS: Preoperative chemoradiation for advanced vulvar cancer: a phase II study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998 Aug 1; 42(1): 79-85[Medline].
  • Piura B, Masotina A, Murdoch J, et al: Recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: a study of 73 cases. Gynecol Oncol 1993 Feb; 48(2): 189-95[Medline].
  • Podratz KC, Symmonds RE, Taylor WF: Carcinoma of the vulva: analysis of treatment failures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982 Jun 1; 143(3): 340-51[Medline].
  • Podratz KC, Symmonds RE, Taylor WF, Williams TJ: Carcinoma of the vulva: analysis of treatment and survival. Obstet Gynecol 1983 Jan; 61(1): 63-74[Medline].
  • Rouzier R, Haddad B, Dubernard G: Inguinofemoral dissection for carcinoma of the vulva: effect of modifications of extent and technique on morbidity and survival. J Am Coll Surg 2003 Mar; 196(3): 442-50[Medline].
  • Schulz MJ, Penalver M: Recurrent vulvar carcinoma in the intervening tissue bridge in early invasive stage I disease treated by radical vulvectomy and bilateral groin dissection through separate incisions. Gynecol Oncol 1989 Dec; 35(3): 383-6[Medline].
  • Sedlis A, Homesley H, Bundy BN, et al: Positive groin lymph nodes in superficial squamous cell vulvar cancer. A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987 May; 156(5): 1159-64[Medline].
  • Siller BS, Alvarez RD, Conner WD, et al: T2/3 vulva cancer: a case-control study of triple incision versus en bloc radical vulvectomy and inguinal lymphadenectomy. Gynecol Oncol 1995 Jun; 57(3): 335-9[Medline].
  • Stehman FB, Bundy BN, Dvoretsky PM, Creasman WT: Early stage I carcinoma of the vulva treated with ipsilateral superficial inguinal lymphadenectomy and modified radical hemivulvectomy: a prospective study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Obstet Gynecol 1992 Apr; 79(4): 490-7[Medline].
  • Taussig FJ: Cancer of the Vulva. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1940; 40: 764.
  • Terada KY, Coel MN, Ko P, Wong JH: Combined use of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and lymphoscintigraphy in the management of squamous cell cancer of the vulva. Gynecol Oncol 1998 Jul; 70(1): 65-9[Medline].
  • Trope C, Johnsson JE, Larsson G, Simonsen E: Bleomycin alone or combined with mitomycin C in treatment of advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. Cancer Treat Rep 1980 Apr-May; 64(4-5): 639-42[Medline].
  • Wagner W, Prott FJ, Weissmann J: Vulvar carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of 80 patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 1999; 262(3-4): 99-104[Medline].
  • Way S: Carcinoma of the Vulva. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1960; 79: 692-97.
  • Wharton JT, Gallager S, Rutledge FN: Microinvasive carcinoma of the vulva. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1974 Jan 15; 118(2): 159-62[Medline].
  • Wilkinson EJ: The 1989 presidential address. International Society for the Study of Vulvar Disease. J Reprod Med 1990 Nov; 35(11): 981-91[Medline].
  • Wilkinson EJ: Superficial invasive carcinoma of the vulva. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1985 Mar; 28(1): 188-95[Medline].
  • Zhang SH, Sood AK, Sorosky JI, et al: Preservation of the saphenous vein during inguinal lymphadenectomy decreases morbidity in patients with carcinoma of the vulva. Cancer 2000 Oct 1; 89(7): 1520-5[Medline].

Surgical Treatment of Vulvar Cancer excerpt