Continually Updated Clinical Reference
 
 
  All Sources     eMedicine     Medscape     Drug Reference     MEDLINE
 
eMedicine - Chordoma : Article by

Quick Find
Authors & Editors
Introduction
Indications
Relevant Anatomy
Contraindications
Workup
Treatment
Complications
Outcome and Prognosis
Future and Controversies
Multimedia
References




Patient Education
Click here for patient education.



Author: Cheryl Ann Palmer, MD, Professor, Departments of Pathology and Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine; Consulting Staff, Departments of Pathology and Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital; Consulting Staff, Departments of Pathology and Neurology, Veteran Affairs Medical Center; Consulting Staff, Department of Pathology, Children's Hospital of Alabama

Cheryl Ann Palmer is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Neurology, American Association of Neuropathologists, Medical Association of the State of Alabama, Society for Neuro-Oncology, and Southern Medical Association

Coauthor(s): Daniel Keith Harrison, MD, Neuropathology Fellow, Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Editors: Duc Hoang Duong, MD, Professor, Chief Physician, Departments of Neurological Surgery and Neuroscience, Epilepsy Center, Charles R Drew University; Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine; Ryszard M Pluta, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Neurosurgical Department Medical Research Center, Polish Academy of Sciences at Warsaw, Poland; Senior Researcher, Surgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH; Paolo Zamboni, MD, Professor of Surgery, Chief of Day Surgery Unit, Chair of Vascular Diseases Center, University of Ferrara, Italy; Allen R Wyler, MD, Former Medical Director, Northstar Neuroscience, Inc

Author and Editor Disclosure

Synonyms and related keywords: cranial chordoma, intracranial chordoma, vertebral chordomas, sacrococcygeal chordoma, malignant midline tumor, embryonic notochordal remnants, ectopic notochord remnants, neuraxis, CNS tumors, ecchondrosis physaliphora, primary intracranial neoplasms, sacrum, clivus, spinal axis, rectal dysfunction, urinary incontinence, bladder dysfunction, diplopia, headache, lower extremity weakness, cranial nerve palsy, hoarseness, dysphagia, pharyngeal bleeding, physaliferous cells

Chordomas are rare tumors that arise from embryonic notochordal remnants along the length of the neuraxis at developmentally active sites. These sites are the ends of the neuraxis and the vertebral bodies. Chordomas comprise less than 1% of CNS tumors, though they can occur in extraaxial locations. Chordomas are thought to arise from ectopic notochord remnants.

History of the Procedure

In 1857, Virchow originally described chordomas when he named them ecchondrosis physaliphora, believing they were cartilaginous in origin. In 1895, Ribbert pierced a nucleus pulposus and found similar tumors. From this bit of evidence, he correctly surmised the notochordal origin of chordomas.

Problem

Ecchordosis physaliphora is a term that refers to small, well-circumscribed, gelatinous masses adherent to the brainstem. Although composed of notochordal remnants, ecchordosis physaliphora seldom, if ever, progresses into chordoma. Ecchordosis physaliphora is a reported finding in approximately 2% of autopsy examinations, but chordomas are quite rare.

Even though chordomas usually are slow-growing tumors, they are locally aggressive with a tendency to infiltrate into adjacent tissues and organs. Local recurrence results in tissue destruction and generally is the cause of death. Metastases are recognized but are uncommon.

Frequency

Chordomas are rare neoplasms. As primary intracranial neoplasms, they only constitute 0.2% of all CNS tumors; however, they constitute 2-4% of all primary bone neoplasms. Chordomas generally occur in 3 locations, which are, in descending order of frequency, the sacrum, intracranially at the clivus, and along the spinal axis. Fifty percent of chordomas occur in the sacrum, and spinal axis chordomas are rare. Occasional parasellar and sellar examples have been described, and extraaxial sites have been reported in the literature.

When considering all locations, the male-to-female ratio is 2:1. However, skull base tumors, as a subgroup, tend to have a more equal sex distribution. A number of reports indicate that chordomas are seen in all age groups, with the peak incidence varying by site. Intracranial chordomas present in a much younger age group than their spinal counterparts because the relevant anatomy of the clival region produces earlier symptomatology. In one series of chordomas reviewed, the average age at diagnosis of all patients with chordomas was 56 years, with an age range of 27-80 years. When considered by site, the average age for intracranial chordomas is 48 years; as a subgroup, chordomas of the sphenoccipital area have an average occurrence age of 38 years. The average age for sacrococcygeal chordomas is 56 years. For chordomas occurring along the vertebrae, the average age is 46 years.

Etiology

Chordomas are thought to arise from primitive notochordal remnants along the axial skeleton. During development, the notochord is surrounded by the developing vertebral column. In adults, remnants of the notochord are present as the nucleus pulposus of the intervertebral discs. Notochordal remnants that are extradural are most common at the sacrococcygeal region but can be found at any site along the length of the axial skeleton. The distribution of tumors matches the distribution of notochordal remnants.

A genetic basis has been described for some chordomas. However, most exhibit complex abnormal karyotypes including whole or partial losses of chromosomes 3, 4, 10, and 13, gains in chromosome 7, and rearrangements of chromosome 1p.1 All have been implicated in the pathogenesis of chordomas. Also, microsatellite instability resulting from DNA mismatch repair deficiencies has been demonstrated, however, no chordoma-specific translocations have been identified.

Pathophysiology

Chordomas are characterized by slow growth, with local destruction of the bone and extension into the adjacent soft tissue. Very rarely, distant metastases are encountered. These tumors usually have a relatively indolent but prolonged course with multiple local recurrences, and, eventually, they may be responsible for mortality.

Clinical

The clinical presentation is entirely dependent on the location of the chordoma. At the sacrum, common presenting symptoms are back and/or lower extremity pain. About one half of patients with chordomas have autonomic symptoms, particularly rectal dysfunction or urinary incontinence. About one half of patients with chordomas have a palpable sacral mass.

With intracranial tumors, the most common presenting symptoms are diplopia and headache. Neurologic signs also occur in over one half of the patients, primarily as cranial nerve palsies. Palsies of cranial nerve VI and the sensory branch of V are the most common.

Patients with tumors located along lower vertebrae may present with pain, bladder dysfunction, or lower extremity weakness. Patients with tumors located along cervical vertebrae present with hoarseness, dysphagia, and, occasionally, pharyngeal bleeding. Other rare or unique symptoms have been reported but are the exception. The time span from the onset of symptoms to diagnosis averages 10 months.



Surgical therapy for these tumors is indicated as they continuously grow, albeit slowly, and erode bone and adjacent soft tissue, causing marked destruction of surrounding tissues.



The location of the notochord along the spinal canal is directly related to the location of notochord remnants, particularly at the ends of the spinal axis. Of chordomas, 49% occur at the sacrococcygeal region, and 30% occur at the sphenoccipital region, with nearly all of these occurring at the clivus. These tumors have a variable extension. Vertebral chordomas account for only 15% of total chordomas and occur in the lumbar, cervical, and thoracic regions in descending order of frequency.

Grossly, chordomas are variable in size. They are soft, gelatinous, smooth, or lobulated and are gray-white in color on their outer surface. On cut section, the tumor is homogeneous in color and consistency. Occasionally, calcifications or hemorrhages are present. Chordomas appear to be encapsulated when in soft tissue but not when they are located in bone.



Contraindications to surgery for excision of a chordoma primarily are related to general health of the patient and preexisting medical conditions. The patient should be evaluated for cardiac, pulmonary, hematological, or endocrine disorders as well as coagulation status. These disorders need to be addressed and managed prior to surgery.



Lab Studies

No laboratory studies are required for the evaluation of chordomas, except as needed for routine preoperative evaluation in patients scheduled to undergo surgical resection.

Imaging Studies

  • CT scan or MRI studies are indicated to evaluate the extent of the tumor and to identify the tissues that the chordoma has infiltrated. Knowledge of the extent of the tumor is important in planning the optimal surgical approach.
    • With CT scans, chordomas at any site appear as single or multiple areas of decreased attenuation within the clivus, vertebrae, or sacrum. Fingers of low density radiate throughout the mass and into the adjacent tissues. If the chordoma has a significant chondroid component, focal regions of hyperdensity may be present. The lesions are expansile with destructive or lytic lesions in the bone.
    • On MRI, the appearance of a chordoma is similar to the appearance on CT scan, with better resolution of the soft-tissue component, resulting in better anatomical definition (see Image 1). Chordomas are hyperintense on T2 images and hypointense on T1 images.
  • Plain radiographs may be useful to demonstrate the amount of bone involvement.
    • Plain-film radiographs may show an ill-defined endosteal margin or a bulky mass in the soft tissue. The lesions also may be lytic.
    • In general, and especially in clival chordomas, erosion of the bone, particularly the tip of the clivus, and a sclerotic bone reaction are seen radiographically. The mass appears as a destructive well-demarcated lesion. The discovery of these features can better clarify the diagnosis of chordomas in the differential of bony lesions.

Other Tests

No other tests are required in the evaluation of chordomas.

Diagnostic Procedures

  • As described above, imaging techniques of the clivus usually demonstrate features adequate for differentiating chordomas from other site-specific lesions. In the sacrum, radiographic features are more similar to other common bone tumors and while they may be suggestive of a chordoma, they are not diagnostic.
  • Biopsies of chordomas are useful only when other bone lesions remain in the differential diagnosis after imaging studies are performed. In this instance, tissue diagnosis by biopsy can enable optimal planning for surgical resection of the tumor. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is the preferred method for establishing the preoperative morphologic diagnosis of chordoma and has been reported to lower local recurrence rates when compared with open biopsy.2 The diagnostic criteria for chordoma in FNA include the presence of physaliphorous cells with round nuclei, bland chromatin and distinct cytoplasmic borders in a background of abundant myxoid ground substance.
  • Surgical resection remains the primary mode of treatment for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. The prognosis of chordomas generally depends on the extent and completeness of the tumor excision.

Histologic Findings

Microscopically, chordomas are composed of uniform cells with small oval or round eccentric nuclei and dense chromatin. The hallmark microscopic features of chordomas are the numerous, variably sized vacuoles located in the tumor cell cytoplasm, the physaliphorous cells (see Image 2 and Image 3). Some tumor cells may have more solid or eosinophilic cytoplasm.

Various histologic growth patterns can be seen in chordomas. The cells may be arranged in a diffuse or lobular pattern, or they may be clustered in groups or islands in a sheetlike pattern. Areas of tumor cells may be seen in a solid, perivascular, or even ribbonlike pattern. Between the cells or clusters, an abundant basophilic-to-metachromatic mucinous matrix exists. Mitoses, foci of pleomorphic cells, or focal hemorrhage rarely can be seen but are not prominent features.

Fibrous tissue surrounds the neoplasm and extends projections into the tumor, usually without forming a true capsule.

A chondroid variant of chordoma is well recognized. In these tumors, a significant cartilaginous component is present with features of either chondrosarcomas or chondromas. Some authors believe these entities are separate and that studies with both immunoperoxidase staining and electron microscopy can distinguish them. Also, patients with this variant were once thought to have a slightly better prognosis; however, recent large studies have shown this variant to be of no prognostic significance.

With specialized histochemistry, chordoma tumor cells tend to be periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) positive. The matrix stains diffusely with mucicarmine and Alcian blue, and it stains metachromatically with toluidine blue; it is negative with Sudan black.

In electron microscopy, ultrastructural features in chordomas include desmosomal attachments and prominent mucinous vacuoles.

Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells label with cytokeratins and epithelial membrane antigen (EMA). Both chordomas and the embryologic notochord are S-100 positive, whereas most carcinomas are negative. This difference in S-100 positivity can be helpful in the differentiation of metastatic carcinomas from chordomas in instances in which the histologic pattern is similar. Positivity for cytokeratins and EMA can be helpful in distinguishing the chondroid variant of chordoma from chondrosarcoma.

More recently, immunohistochemical and gene microarray studies reveal the presence of high levels of brachyury in axial chordomas. Brachyury is a key transcription factor in the development of posterior mesoderm which becomes restricted to the notochord and tailbud. Although research is ongoing, initial data indicate brachyury could be a novel biomarker in distinguishing chordomas from chondroid neoplasms as well as other histologically similar entities.3, 4

The role of MIB-1 immunohistochemical staining (a proliferation marker) as a prognostic indicator in chordomas is controversial, but data suggest that an increased MIB-1 labeling index correlates with recurrence.

Recent investigations have looked at cell cycle alterations and the role of the p53 tumor suppressor gene in chordoma tumorigenesis. Early data suggest that p53 overexpression characterized by increased immunohistochemical staining for p53 protein is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with chordoma.5

Staging

Chordomas, like other bone tumors, have been subject to staging methods. Studies analyzing the prognosis and outcome in comparison to stage have not proven to be very useful. As discussed above, the local extent and degree of resection are much more important to the prognosis of a chordoma (see Problem).



Medical therapy

Clinical trials are underway to study the effectiveness of imatinib mesylate in the treatment of chordoma (Casali et al., 2004). Imatinib mesylate is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting several enzymes including platelet-derived growth factor receptor--b (PDGFRB), which can be expressed in chordomas. This drug has been shown to have antitumor activity in chordomas; however, research is ongoing and surgery remains the standard treatment for chordomas. Adjuvant radiation therapy is used in cases where incomplete resection is suspected. Chemotherapy has not been shown to be effective.

Surgical therapy

The treatment of chordomas depends on the extent and location of the tumor. In general, a more complete removal with wide excision delays the time interval between surgery and eventual recurrence. The natural history and the effectiveness of different kinds of therapy are not well understood in chordomas because of their rare incidence and slow-growing nature.

Radical resections of tumors with clean margins are associated with a longer disease-free interval. If subtotal excision is the only option (generally due to location and proximity to delicate anatomy), the addition of radiation therapy can lengthen the interval to recurrence. In cases in which radiation therapy is utilized without surgical resection, an average of only 50% for 10-year local control is seen for skull-based and cervical spine tumors.

Preoperative details

Imaging of the tumor prior to surgery can reveal the extent of the tumor by ascertaining both the amount of bone involvement or erosion and the extent of expansion of the tumor into adjacent soft tissues. This information can be important for planning the most advantageous resection possible.

As for any surgical patient, the normal preoperative history and physical are required. Other medical problems need to be stabilized or addressed (eg, cardiovascular, respiratory). Laboratory studies, including electrolytes, coagulation status, and blood count, are needed. Radiological studies (x-ray, CT scan, MRI) can be used for both evaluation of the tumor and other medical problems. Chest x-rays, ECGs, and blood crossmatch also may be important.

Intraoperative details

The evaluation of tumor margins is essential to assess the status of the resection as the resection proceeds. Knowledge of the completeness of the tumor resection helps predict patient outcome in terms of the length of the disease-free interval and assists in determination of the need for adjunctive therapy such as radiation.

Postoperative details

General postoperative complications relevant to this or any surgery include wound infection or infection of the operative bed (abscess), shock, pulmonary complications (respiratory failure, atelectasis, infection), and bladder infection or urinary retention.

Complications particular to cranial neurosurgery include the possibilities of intracranial hemorrhage, meningitis, osteomyelitis, seizures, hydrocephalus, increased intracranial pressure, hematoma formation, swollen eyelids, keratitis, and facial palsy.

Rehabilitation may be necessary in the case of sacral surgeries, depending on the extent of damage to the spinal cord and the level of presurgical functioning.

Recovery from either sacral or cranial procedures depends on the extent of tumor removal and intraoperative injury of adjacent neural structures. Problems may include, but are not limited to, facial palsies, incontinence, and difficulty walking.

Follow-up

Frequent follow-up is required because of the high rate of recurrence of these tumors. Tumor recurrence identified early is easier to treat. The average interval to recurrence is 3.8 years for radically resected tumors, 2.1 years for subtotal resection followed by radiation therapy, and 8 months for subtotal excision without adjuvant therapy. The interval of follow-up, including repeat MRI or CT scans, depends on the completeness of the resection. Because residual tumor drastically shortens the recurrence time, patients with known or suspected residual tumor need to be evaluated more frequently.



Complications occur at a higher rate after radical resections than with subtotal resections and depend somewhat on the location of the tumor.

Morbidity from surgery can be very mild or severe following tumor resection. With the resection of sacrococcygeal chordomas, bowel and bladder dysfunction are the most frequent complications.



Chordomas are relatively benign-appearing neoplasms; however, because of their tendency to erode bone and invade soft tissues, they usually display malignant behavior. In addition, the location of the tumor influences the ability to achieve complete resection. Chordomas often grow in inaccessible sites, and their margins within soft tissue often are not well defined. As a result, complete excision of chordomas is difficult at best.

The 5-year survival rate is estimated to be 51%, and the 10-year survival is estimated to be 35%. Factors that may improve prognosis are young age, complete resection, and the addition of radiation therapy in incompletely resected tumors.



Molecular and cytogenetic studies continue to explore new treatment modalities for chordoma, but the most significant dilemma remains the choice between a radical surgical procedure with the potential for serious morbidity and a subtotal resection with an increased potential for recurrence. The general health of the patient should be considered during planning for the surgical procedure. With explanations of the risks and benefits provided to the patient, an informed decision regarding therapy can be reached.



Media file 1:  This pelvic CT scan shows a large presacral mass eroding bone.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  CT

Media file 2:  A light microscopic view of a hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)–stained section of a chordoma showing the characteristic physaliphorous cells and mucinous matrix.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Image

Media file 3:  A higher magnification light microscopic view of a hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)–stained section of a chordoma showing physaliphorous cells.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Image



  1. Brandal P, Bjerkehagen B, Danielsen H, Heim S. Chromosome 7 abnormalities are common in chordomas. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. Jul 1 2005;160(1):15-21. [Medline].
  2. Bergh P, Kindblom LG, Gunterberg B, Remotti F, Ryd W, Meis-Kindblom JM. Prognostic factors in chordoma of the sacrum and mobile spine: a study of 39 patients. Cancer. May 1 2000;88(9):2122-34. [Medline].
  3. Vujovic S, Henderson S, Presneau N, Odell E, Jacques TS, Tirabosco R. Brachyury, a crucial regulator of notochordal development, is a novel biomarker for chordomas. J Pathol. Jun 2006;209(2):157-65. [Medline].
  4. Tirabosco R, Mangham DC, Rosenberg AE, Vujovic S, Bousdras K, Pizzolitto S. Brachyury expression in extra-axial skeletal and soft tissue chordomas: a marker that distinguishes chordoma from mixed tumor/myoepithelioma/parachordoma in soft tissue. Am J Surg Pathol. Apr 2008;32(4):572-80. [Medline].
  5. Naka T, Boltze C, Kuester D, Schulz TO, Schneider-Stock R, Kellner A, et al. Alterations of G1-S checkpoint in chordoma: the prognostic impact of p53 overexpression. Cancer. Sep 15 2005;104(6):1255-63. [Medline].
  6. Bailey P. Intracranial Tumors. 2nd ed. Springfield, Ill:. Charles C Thomas Publisher;1948.
  7. Bigner DD, McLendon RE, Bruner JM, eds. Russell & Rubinstein's Pathology of Tumors of the Nervous System. 6th ed. Hodder Headline Group;1998:421-423.
  8. Boriani S, Bandiera S, Biagini R, Bacchini P, Boriani L, Cappuccio M. Chordoma of the mobile spine: fifty years of experience. Spine. Feb 15 2006;31(4):493-503. [Medline].
  9. Breteau N, Demasure M, Lescrainier J, Sabbattier R, Michenet P. Sacrococcygeal chordomas: potential role of high LET therapy. Recent Results Cancer Res. 1998;150:148-55. [Medline].
  10. Burger PC, Scheithauer BW, Vogel FS. Chordoma. In: Surgical Pathology of the Nervous System and its Coverings. 2002;4th ed Churchill Livingstone:23-26 and 508-509.
  11. Casali PG, Messina A, Stacchiotti S, Tamborini E, Crippa F, Gronchi A, et al. Imatinib mesylate in chordoma. Cancer. Nov 1 2004;101(9):2086-97. [Medline].
  12. Cheng EY, Ozerdemoglu RA, Transfeldt EE, Thompson RC Jr. Lumbosacral chordoma. Prognostic factors and treatment. Spine. Aug 15 1999;24(16):1639-45. [Medline].
  13. Fuchs B, Dickey ID, Yaszemski MJ, Inwards CY, Sim FH. Operative management of sacral chordoma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Oct 2005;87(10):2211-6. [Medline].
  14. Giannoni CM. Chordomas. In: Grand Rounds Archives; Baylor College. The Bobby R Alford Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Communicative Sciences Web Site. 1992;Available at: www.bcm.tmc.edu/oto/grand/10192.html. [Full Text].
  15. Lantos PL, Louis DN, Rosenblum MK and Kleihues P. Tumours of the nervous system. In: Graham DI, Lantos PL, eds. Greenfield's Neuropathology. 7th ed;Arnold, a member of the Hodder Headline Group:2002:(Volume II) 960-964.
  16. Maclean FM, Soo MY, Ng T. Chordoma: radiological-pathological correlation. Australas Radiol. Aug 2005;49(4):261-8. [Medline].
  17. Munzenrider JE, Liebsch NJ. Proton therapy for tumors of the skull base. Strahlenther Onkol. Jun 1999;175 Suppl 2:57-63. [Medline].
  18. Ozdemir MH, Gürkan I, Yildiz Y, Yilmaz C, Saglik Y. Surgical treatment of malignant tumours of the sacrum. Eur J Surg Oncol. Feb 1999;25(1):44-9. [Medline].
  19. Ribbert H, Virchow R. Chordoma. In: Windeyer BW. Procedings of the Royal Society of Medicine. Vol 52. 1959:1088-1100.
  20. Wippold FJ 2nd, Koeller KK, Smirniotopoulos JG. Clinical and imaging features of cervical chordoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. May 1999;172(5):1423-6. [Medline].
  21. York JE, Kaczaraj A, Abi-Said D, Fuller GN, Skibber JM, Janjan NA, et al. Sacral chordoma: 40-year experience at a major cancer center. Neurosurgery. Jan 1999;44(1):74-9; discussion 79-80. [Medline].

Chordoma excerpt

Article Last Updated: Jun 5, 2008