You are in: eMedicine Specialties > Trauma > Thoracic Trauma Flail ChestArticle Last Updated: Jun 19, 2006AUTHOR AND EDITOR INFORMATIONSection 1 of 9
  Author: H Scott Bjerke, MD, FACS, Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Medical Director of Trauma Services, Methodist Hospital, Clarian Health Partners, Inc H Scott Bjerke is a member of the following medical societies: American Association for the History of Medicine, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, American College of Surgeons, Association for Academic Surgery, Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma, Midwest Surgical Association, National Association of EMS Physicians, Pan-Pacific Surgical Association, Royal Society of Medicine, Southwestern Surgical Congress, and Wilderness Medical Society Editors: Lewis J Kaplan, MD, FACS, FCCM, FCCP, Director, SICU and Surgical Critical Care Fellowship, Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Section of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, and Surgical Emergencies, Yale University School of Medicine; Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine; Robert L Sheridan, MD, Assistant Chief of Staff, Chief of Burn Surgery, Shriners Burns Hospital; Associate Professor of Surgery, Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Burns, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School; Paolo Zamboni, MD, Professor of Surgery, Chief of Day Surgery Unit, Chair of Vascular Diseases Center, University of Ferrara, Italy; John Geibel, MD, DSc, MA, Professor, Department of Surgery, Section of Gastrointestinal Medicine and Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine; Director of Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, Yale-New Haven Hospital Author and Editor Disclosure Synonyms and related keywords: blunt chest trauma, blunt force chest trauma, motor vehicle accident, rib fracture, multiple myeloma, sternal absence, total sternectomy INTRODUCTIONSection 2 of 9
  Severe blunt injury to the chest continues to be one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in both young and old trauma victims. Flail chest is one of the worst subset of these injuries and is likely the most common serious injury to the thorax seen by clinicians. Multiple care patterns and treatment modalities have emerged, many based on anecdotal clinical observation and evidence. Within the last 20 years, more rigorous scientific methods have been applied to the problem, in both the clinical setting and laboratory. This article reviews the most salient data of the recent literature and discusses some of the diagnostic and treatment options that are now available in the treatment of flail chest. History of the ProcedureFlail chest has been observed and reported for many years in the medical and emergency medical science literature. The relatively infrequent occurrence in any one geographic location made large-scale treatment trials difficult, if not impossible. The 1958 Emergency War Surgery NATO Handbook mentions flail chest twice, once as a potential cause of failed resuscitation and once to note field treatment. This field treatment consisted of "firm strapping" of the affected area to prevent the flail-like motion. By 1988, the Emergency War Surgery NATO Handbook (second US revision) mentions flail chest only once, without noting treatment recommendations and broaches the concept that the underlying lung injury—not the flail segment itself—is the major determinant of morbidity. Older surgical textbooks contain photographs depicting the use of towel clips placed around rib segments and placed on traction to stabilize the rib cage. With the advent of intensive care units, older textbooks often advocated orotracheal intubation with positive pressure ventilation to pneumatically stent the ribcage. While many patients with flail chest require intubation, advances in the knowledge of physiology and chest wall mechanics, as well as the potential morbidity of prolonged mechanical ventilation, have reestablished that it is the severity of the underlying lung injury and not the flail segment that causes a problem. ProblemFlail chest is traditionally described as the paradoxical movement of a segment of chest wall caused by fractures of 3 or more ribs anteriorly and posteriorly within each rib. Variations include posterior flail segments, anterior flail segments, and flail including the sternum with ribs on both sides of the thoracic cage fractured. Flail chest is foremost a clinical finding and observation that is often accompanied by physiologic derangements, which are sometimes globally lumped into the diagnosis. The lumping of signs and symptoms has resulted in confusion regarding both the treatment strategies and the overall importance of the clinical finding. Mechanically, flail chest generally requires a significant force diffused over a large area (ie, the thorax) to create multiple anterior and posterior rib fractures. If the structural components (ie, the ribs) are weakened for any reason (eg, osteoporosis), then much lower force may be required. The actual motion of the flail segment is usually limited by the surrounding structural components, the intercostals, and the surrounding musculature. This mechanical limitation of motion affects the actual size of the changes in thoracic volume and patient-generated tidal volume. Underlying pulmonary or cardiac disease determines the physiologic perturbations to respiration caused by the flail segment. Even more important is the amount of injury to the underlying structures, specifically the lungs and heart. Respiratory insufficiency in flail chest is much more likely to be a result of the underlying severity of pulmonary contusion and ventilation perfusion mismatch than the actual structural defect to the chest wall. Thus, the adept surgeon usually looks past the structural deformity and determines the physiologic compromise caused by the pain of the rib fractures, the tidal volume changes, and the underlying pulmonary and cardiac injury. FrequencyThe exact incidence of flail chest is not precisely known. The Major Trauma Outcome Study of 50,000 patients documented about 75 patients with flail chest injuries (Champion et al, 1990). From 1971-1982, Landercasper et al documented 62 consecutive patients. From 1981-1987, the Detroit Receiving Hospital noted 57 patients with flail chest. In 1995, Ahmed and Mohyuddin documented 64 cases over a 10-year period. Based on these articles, an average American College of Surgeons (ACS)-verified level 1 or level 2 trauma center will see about 1-2 cases per month. The incidence of flail chest at nontrauma center facilities is unknown. EtiologyFlail chest requires significant blunt force trauma to the torso to fracture the ribs in multiple areas. Such trauma may be caused by motor vehicle accidents, falls, and assaults in younger, healthy patients. Flail chest is an indicator of significant kinetic force to the chest wall and rib cage but also may occur with lesser trauma in persons with underlying pathology, including osteoporosis, total sternectomy, and multiple myeloma. PathophysiologyIn an adult, a transfer of significant kinetic energy in blunt trauma to the rib cage or a crushing rollover injury is the most frequent cause of flail chest. In children, who have a more compliant chest wall, flail chest is observed with lower frequency than injury to the underlying structures, including the lungs, heart, and mediastinal structures. ClinicalFlail chest is a clinical anatomic diagnosis noted in blunt trauma patients with paradoxical or reverse motion of a chest wall segment while spontaneously breathing. This clinical finding disappears after intubation with positive pressure ventilation, which occasionally results in a delayed diagnosis of the condition. The strict definition of 3 ribs broken in 2 or more places can be confirmed only by x-ray, but the inherent structural stability of the chest wall due to ribs and intercostal muscles usually does not show abnormal or paradoxical motion without 3 or more ribs involved. Patients may demonstrate only the paradoxical chest wall motion, and they may have minimal-to-incapacitating respiratory insufficiency, although they usually show some tachypnea with a notable decrease in resting tidal volume due to fracture pain. The degree of respiratory insufficiency is typically related to the underlying lung injury, rather than the chest wall abnormality. RELEVANT ANATOMYSection 3 of 9
The chest wall is inherently stable, with 12 ribs attaching posteriorly to the spinal column and anteriorly to the sternum. Intercostal muscles with fascial attachments, coupled with other muscle groups, including the trapezius and the serratus groups, add further strength to the bony cage around the thoracic organs. The arch design of the ribs allows for some flexing, more so in children than adults, which can absorb small amounts of blunt kinetic energy. Crush or rollover injuries, especially with heavy objects or significant deceleration injury commonly breaks a rib in 1 position, but only a significant impact breaks a rib in 2 or more positions. WORKUPSection 4 of 9
Lab Studies
Imaging Studies
TREATMENTSection 5 of 9
Medical therapyInternal pneumatic stabilization for flail chest was popularized in the 1950s but has subsequently been shown to be unnecessary in most patients without respiratory compromise. In a mid-1970s report, Trinkle et al provided compelling evidence that many patients fared better with adequate pain control and pulmonary toilet (including medical management of their pulmonary injury) than those placed on mechanical ventilation. This remains the standard today. Mechanical ventilation is reserved for patients with persistent respiratory insufficiency or failure after adequate pain control or when complications related to excessive narcotic use occur. Patient-controlled analgesia machines, oral pain medications, and indwelling epidural catheters form the mainstay of current treatment. Two recent clinical reports, one out of Turkey (prospective) and one out of Japan (retrospective), have shown that continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) by mask may decrease mortality and nosocomial pneumonia in the ICU but do not appear to change the length of ICU stay. Surgical therapySurgical stabilization of the chest was rarely considered necessary in the past, but increasing numbers of reports of positive outcomes in more severe cases are now available in the world literature. Both external (lower efficacy) and internal stabilization have been advocated, usually in reports from outside the United States. As previously noted in traumatic causes, however, severity of respiratory failure is less a result of either the paradoxical motion of the chest wall (tidal volume abnormalities) or chest wall instability. Accordingly, surgical stabilization is still not routinely performed, although many reports show a benefit in mechanical ventilator days, long-term outcome, and overall lower cost of hospitalization. In general, operative fixation is most commonly performed in patients requiring a thoracotomy for other reasons or in cases of gross chest wall deformity. Flail chest from multiple myeloma, sternal absence, or total sternectomy more frequently responds well to surgical fixation. Underlying pulmonary injury with respiratory insufficiency resulting from changes in tidal volume and minute ventilation in these patients is rare. Preoperative detailsAssessment of the severity of underlying pulmonary contusion versus chest wall instability should direct the need for surgical fixation. Preoperatively, a double-lumen endotracheal tube should be considered in patients undergoing fixation. Intraoperative detailsThe current literature suggests that both ends of a fractured rib must be stabilized for operative intervention to be most effective. Judet struts, Kirschner wires, and even prosthetic mesh secured with methylmethacrylate techniques have been described in the literature, but no large randomized prospective trial has been completed to compare the techniques at this time. Postoperative detailsRoutine postthoracotomy care with ICU or surgical step-down level observation and close monitoring of respiratory parameters is crucial. Follow-upFollow-up chest x-rays and pulmonary function tests determine resolution of underlying pulmonary pathology and any possible long-term disability as a result of the initial condition. COMPLICATIONSSection 6 of 9
Reports in the medical literature note a high level of long-term disability in patients sustaining flail chest. Beal and Oreskovich reported a 22% disability rate with over 63% having long-term problems, including persistent chest wall pain, deformity, and dyspnea on exertion. Kishikawa et al, however, noted resolution of altered pulmonary function within 6 months, even with chest wall deformity still present. OUTCOME AND PROGNOSISSection 7 of 9
Overall, patients with flail chest have a 5-10% reported mortality if they reach the hospital alive. Patients who do not need mechanical ventilation do better statistically and overall mortality seems to increase with increasing injury severity scores (ISS). Few long-term follow-up studies are available. In the absence of concomitant lethal injuries, Freedland et al reported adverse outcomes to be more likely with more severe associated injuries noted by Injury Severity Scale scoring, excessive blood loss and transfusion requirements, bilateral flail chest, and patient age older than 50 years. A recent report by Albaugh and associates in New Jersey noted flail chest mortality increased 132% with each decade of life, but another report by Athanassiadi and associates found no correlation with age. Both studies noted increasing mortality with increasing ISS. As previously noted, some reports suggest a high rate of disability after flail chest; however, most patients do well and return to normal function after 6-12 months. FUTURE AND CONTROVERSIESSection 8 of 9
Further improvements in emergency medical systems and the education of prehospital personnel may increase the observed frequency of flail chest in the future. Improvements in noninvasive ventilation techniques like CPAP and pain control may also improve currently observed outcomes. Prevention, including safer automobiles and newer airbag design may affect the incidence and outcome of these multifactorial injuries. REFERENCESSection 9 of 9
Article Last Updated: Jun 19, 2006 |
