AUTHOR AND EDITOR INFORMATION

Section 1 of 9  

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction
• Risk of Preterm Labor
• Assessment of Risk During Pregnancy
• Management of Preterm Labor
• Tocolytic Agents
• Follow-up Care
• Acknowledgments
• References

INTRODUCTION

Section 2 of 9  

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction
• Risk of Preterm Labor
• Assessment of Risk During Pregnancy
• Management of Preterm Labor
• Tocolytic Agents
• Follow-up Care
• Acknowledgments
• References

Preterm labor is defined as the presence of uterine contractions of sufficient frequency and intensity to effect progressive effacement and dilation of the cervix prior to term gestation (between 20 and 37 wk). Preterm labor precedes almost half of preterm births and preterm birth occurs in approximately 12% of pregnancies and is the leading cause of neonatal mortality in the United States.^{1, 2} In addition, preterm birth accounts for 70% of neonatal morbidity, mortality, and health care dollars spent on the neonate, largely due to the 2% of American women delivering very premature infants (<32 wk).^{1, 2}

Despite the current use of material, effort, and money in perinatal medical technology, neonatal mortality rates for newborns born in the United States (5 per 1,000 babies) may rank as low as 32^nd among the 33 industrialized nations, superior only to Latvia.³ Successful reduction of perinatal morbidity and mortality associated with prematurity may require the implementation of effective risk identification and behavioral modification programs for the prevention of preterm labor; these in turn require both an improved understanding of the psychosocial risk factors, etiology, and mechanisms of preterm labor and programs for accurate identification of pregnant women at risk for premature labor and delivery. In fact, recent evidence suggests that early identification of at-risk gravidas with timely referral for subspecialized obstetrical care may help identify women at risk for preterm labor and delivery and decrease the extreme prematurity (<32 wk) rate, thereby reducing the morbidity, mortality, and expense associated with prematurity.⁴

Goals of management

The focus of this article is the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of preterm labor with intact membranes. The management of preterm labor associated with ruptured membranes is reviewed in Premature Rupture of Membranes; however, the overall goals of both management schemes are similar.

Goals of obstetric patient management of preterm labor should include (1) early identification of risk factors associated with preterm birth, (2) timely diagnosis of preterm labor, (3) identifying the etiology of preterm labor, (4) evaluating fetal well-being, (5) providing prophylactic pharmacologic therapy to prolong gestation and reduce the incidence of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and intra-amniotic infection (IAI), (6) initiating tocolytic therapy when indicated, and (7) establishing a plan of maternal and fetal surveillance with patient/provider education to improve neonatal outcome.

RISK OF PRETERM LABOR

Section 3 of 9  

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction
• Risk of Preterm Labor
• Assessment of Risk During Pregnancy
• Management of Preterm Labor
• Tocolytic Agents
• Follow-up Care
• Acknowledgments
• References

The exact mechanism(s) of preterm labor is largely unknown but is believed to include decidual hemorrhage, (eg, abruption, mechanical factors such as uterine overdistension from multiple gestation or polyhydramnios), cervical incompetence (eg, trauma, cone biopsy), uterine distortion (eg, müllerian duct abnormalities, fibroid uterus), cervical inflammation (eg, resulting from bacterial vaginosis [BV], trichomonas), maternal inflammation/fever (eg, urinary tract infection), hormonal changes (eg, mediated by maternal or fetal stress), and uteroplacental insufficiency (eg, hypertension, insulin-dependent diabetes, drug abuse, smoking, alcohol consumption).^{1, 2} Although prediction of preterm delivery remains inexact, a variety of maternal and obstetric characteristics are known to increase the risk, presumably via one of these mechanisms. Finally, the fetus plays a role in the initiation of labor. In a simplistic sense, the fetus recognizes a hostile intrauterine environment and precipitates labor by premature activation of a fetal-placental parturition pathway.

Risk factors for preterm birth include demographic characteristics, behavioral factors, and aspects of obstetric history such as previous preterm birth. Demographic factors for preterm labor include nonwhite race, extremes of maternal age (<17 y or >35 y), low socioeconomic status, and low prepregnancy weight. Preterm labor and birth can be associated with stressful life situations (eg, domestic violence; close family death; insecurity over food, home, or partner; work and home environment) either indirectly by associated risk behaviors or directly by mechanisms not completely understood. Many risk factors may manifest in the same gravida.

Methods used for predicting preterm birth include home uterine activity monitoring (HUAM), assessments of salivary estriol, fetal fibronectin (FFN), the presence of BV, and cervical length assessment.

• While hospital tocodynamometry has been effective for monitoring uterine contractions to evaluate preterm labor, HUAM has not been proven valuable in detecting or preventing preterm birth and is not currently recommended for use.



• The proposed use of salivary estriol measurements in detecting preterm labor was based on the belief that the adrenal gland production of dehydroepiandrosterone increases before the onset of labor, which results in an increase of maternal estriol. Unfortunately, maternal estriol levels show diurnal variation, peaking at night, and are suppressed by betamethasone administration, thereby decreasing the predictive value of salivary estriol in the detection of preterm delivery risk.
  


• FFN is a basement membrane protein that helps bind placental membranes to the decidua. While a negative FFN is helpful in predicting women who are not destined to deliver preterm, a positive FFN has limited value in predicting women who will deliver preterm. Nevertheless, FFN has a predictive value in identifying patients who will or will not deliver within the subsequent 1-2 weeks.
  


• While the presence of BV has been associated with the risk of preterm delivery, prospective treatment trials eradicating asymptomatic BV failed to reduce the risk of preterm delivery.
  


• Longer term prediction of the risk of preterm delivery is achieved by cervical length measurements. A short cervical length in the early or late second trimester has been associated with a markedly increased risk of preterm labor and delivery (see discussion on cervical length). The prediction of preterm delivery may potentially be improved by combining FFN testing with measurements of cervical length.

Preconceptual evaluation

While the risk for preterm birth in nulliparous patients is hard to determine, past obstetric experience and personal behavior may provide significant insight into future pregnancy outcome in multiparous women. Identifying at-risk patients preconceptually may allow additional treatment options. Women who seek birth control have a 30% chance of becoming pregnant in the next 2 years, suggesting that these women represent one potential opportunity for intervention. The presence of the following risk factors should be addressed prior to pregnancy.

Cervical trauma

The most common etiologies for cervical injury are elective abortion, surgeries to treat cervical dysplasia, and injury occurring at delivery. A single uncomplicated elective abortion at less than 10 weeks' gestation does not increase the risk of midtrimester loss or preterm birth unless the cervix has been forcibly dilated to more than 10 mm at the time of the abortion. However, patients with a history of multiple first-trimester elective terminations or one or more second-trimester elective abortions may be at increased risk for preterm delivery. Cervical dilatation with laminaria or cervical ripening agents, such as misoprostol, appears to be less traumatizing to the cervix than mechanical dilation.

Cervical dysplasia should be treated appropriately whenever diagnosed. However the incidence of preterm birth and cervical incompetence may be increased 200-300% after preconceptual surgical treatment (eg, cold knife cone, cryoconization, laser cone, LEEP) of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). The risk of subsequent preterm delivery may be proportional to the amount of cervical tissue removed during surgery. Surprisingly, the ease of performing LEEP for relatively minor abnormalities may have paradoxically led to more cervical injury than was observed with the relatively more invasive cone biopsy.

Obstetric trauma may be underestimated as a risk for midtrimester loss or preterm birth. While women may relate a history of cervical laceration, often they are unaware of the injury and the obstetric records of the previous delivery may be misleading as to the extent of the cervical injury. Therefore, the obstetrician should rely on visual inspection of the cervix for assessment of injury and risk. Defects that involve more than 50% of the cervical length may indicate a higher risk for midtrimester loss. The accuracy of transvaginal ultrasonic measurements to determine risk of cervical incompetence, specifically in the presence of a history of cervical trauma, has yet to be determined. 

Genital tract infection

The young gynecology patient diagnosed with gonorrhea, chlamydia, or trichomoniasis has an approximate 25% risk of reinfection during the subsequent 12 months, but a clear association between these organisms and preterm delivery has not been established. BV is a vaginal syndrome associated with an alteration of the normal vaginal flora rather than an infection specific to any one organism and a lack of vaginal inflammation is evident when compared with vaginitis. The diagnosis of BV should be suspected with a positive Gram stain result or the presence of 3 of 4 traditional diagnostic signs (homogenous gray-white discharge, >20% clue cells on saline wet smear, positive whiff test, and a vaginal pH >4.50) Patients should be treated per the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines, with test-of-cure sampling and subsequent treatment if necessary.

Preterm labor/birth history

A history of prior preterm deliveries places the patient in the high-risk category. Of the predictors of preterm birth, past obstetric history may be one of the strongest predictors of recurrent preterm birth. Given a baseline risk of 10-12%, the risk of recurrent preterm birth after 1, 2, and 3 consecutive preterm births may be increased to approximately 15%, 30%, and 45%, respectively. Preconceptual counseling should help encourage patients to make informed decisions concerning future pregnancy in light of prematurity risk in the presence of previous preterm delivery. Often the best time to counsel the patient is at her 4- to 6-week postpartum check after a preterm delivery.

Midtrimester loss

Midtrimester loss has many etiologies, including infection (eg, syphilis), antiphospholipid syndrome, diabetes, substance abuse, genetic disorders, congenital müllerian abnormalities, cervical trauma, and cervical incompetence. Unfortunately, many midtrimester losses remain unexplained. A complete workup (see History of midtrimester loss) may be of value in selected patients following a midtrimester loss.

ASSESSMENT OF RISK DURING PREGNANCY

Section 4 of 9  

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction
• Risk of Preterm Labor
• Assessment of Risk During Pregnancy
• Management of Preterm Labor
• Tocolytic Agents
• Follow-up Care
• Acknowledgments
• References

Assessment during the first prenatal exam should include the patient's obstetric history, infection risk, and the presence of cervical or uterine abnormalities. If an evaluation for antiphospholipid syndrome is included, it should include anticardiolipin and lupus anticoagulant antibodies.

Physical assessment guidelines to establish risk

The obstetrician should review previous preterm deliveries, including autopsy reports and medical records, if appropriate and available. Social stressors (including housing and food availability), social support in the family, financial stability, domestic violence, drug abuse involving the patient or her family, and death or serious illness in a close family member should be assessed.

The integrity of the cervix and the extent of any prior injury to the cervix may be assessed by speculum and digital examination. The presence of asymptomatic bacteriuria, STD, and symptomatic BV may be investigated.

In some patients, formal cervical length assessment may be of use in risk assessment. 

Cervical length during prenatal care, particularly at 24-28 weeks' gestation, has been demonstrated to be the most sensitive prenatal predictor of preterm birth between both high- and low-risk women. In a mixed high- and low-risk population of singleton pregnancies, transvaginal ultrasound-measured cervical length at 24 weeks was highly correlated with the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery before 35 weeks.⁵ The relative risk of preterm delivery among women with a cervix 25 mm or shorter at 24 weeks was 6.2. Furthermore, at 28 weeks, a short cervix (≤25 mm) was associated with a 9.6 relative risk of preterm delivery. Cervical length 25 mm or shorter at 28 weeks had a 49% sensitivity for prediction of preterm delivery at less than 35 weeks, a value markedly greater than that of cervical funneling.

Among high-risk women with a history of one or more spontaneous preterm births (excluding those with multiple gestation, uterine anomalies, and prior cervical surgeries), 20% of patients demonstrated a cervical length shorter than 25 mm by transvaginal ultrasonography at 22-25 weeks.⁶  Among these patients with a short cervix and one previous preterm birth, 37.5% delivered at less than 35 weeks. In contrast, patients with a cervical length longer than 25 mm had a preterm rate (<35 wk) of only 10.6%. Cervical length has similarly been demonstrated as the optimal predictor of preterm delivery in low-risk women. In an assessment of low-risk women, short cervical length at 24-28 weeks was detected in 8.5% of women.⁷ These patients demonstrated a relative risk of 6.9 for preterm delivery at less than 35 weeks. As compared with fetal fibronectin or Bishop score, cervical length demonstrated the greatest sensitivity (39%), with a specificity of 92.5% and a negative predictive value of 98%.

Among patients with a short cervix, education should be provided concerning the signs and symptoms of preterm labor, especially as the pregnancy approaches potential viability. Prenatal visits/contacts may be scheduled at more frequent intervals to increase patient interaction with the care provider, especially between 20 and 34 weeks' gestation, which may decrease the rate of extreme preterm birth.⁴

Management of specific problems

Randomized clinical trials of cerclage for sonographically suspected cervical incompetence (shortened cervical length and/or funneling) have been inconclusive with respect to prevention of preterm delivery.¹ However, a history of midtrimester losses with loss of cervical integrity, often results in recommendation for cerclage placement between 13 and 17 weeks' gestation. When the patient has a history of midtrimester loss after cone or LEEP biopsy therapy, prophylactic cerclage may be considered, but consulting with a maternal fetal medicine specialist may be beneficial due to the potential risks and the controversial proven benefit. 

History of midtrimester loss

A history of prior midtrimester losses is carefully reviewed at the initial visit to distinguish incompetent cervix from other causes (eg, abruption, infection, intrauterine death, ruptured membranes) with review of the pathology or autopsy reports if available. Parental karyotypes are generally not helpful unless more than one midtrimester loss has occurred or a midtrimester loss has occurred in which the fetus was structurally or genetically abnormal.

Specific laboratory tests, including a rapid plasma reagent test, gonorrheal and chlamydial screening, vaginal pH/wet smear/whiff test, anticardiolipin antibody, lupus anticoagulant antibody, activated partial thromboplastin time, and a 1-hour glucose challenge test are helpful in the evaluation. In addition, one should consider TORCH (toxoplasmosis, other infections, rubella, cytomegalovirus infection, herpes simplex), immunoglobulin G, and immunoglobulin M screening whenever the historical or clinical suspicion is present. However, a random drug screen is not always recommended unless other supporting high-risk behavior exists.

A preconceptual hysterosalpingogram may be of benefit in patients with a history of 2 or more midtrimester losses. One can also attempt to pass a No. 8 Hegar dilator into the nonpregnant cervix; easy passage may be a sign of cervical incompetence. During pregnancy, whenever the suspicion of incompetent cervix exists, one should consider performing baseline transvaginal ultrasonography to assess cervical length, especially at 13-17 weeks' gestation; abnormal findings include a length less than 2.5 cm, funneling greater than 5 mm, or dynamic changes.

A cerclage may be indicated after 2 or more midtrimester losses consistent with incompetent cervix or in which the etiology is unknown and the transvaginal ultrasonography of the cervix is abnormal. A cerclage is usually performed electively at 13-17 weeks' gestation. 

A genetic amniocentesis may be performed prior to the placement of cerclage in patients at high risk for genetic disease. Prior to an elective cerclage, sampling the patient's vagina and cervix for BV, gonorrheal, chlamydial, or trichomonal infection is also recommended, with appropriate treatment instituted. The efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics for cerclage is yet to be demonstrated.

MANAGEMENT OF PRETERM LABOR

Section 5 of 9  

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction
• Risk of Preterm Labor
• Assessment of Risk During Pregnancy
• Management of Preterm Labor
• Tocolytic Agents
• Follow-up Care
• Acknowledgments
• References

Preterm labor may be difficult to diagnose and a potential exists for overtreatment of uterine irritability. Tocolytic agents, while generally safe in appropriate dosages with proper clinical monitoring, have potential morbidity and should only be used after consideration of the risks and benefits of such use. Neonatal morbidity and mortality are greatly affected by gestational age, especially when the pregnancy is less than 28 weeks' gestation. Tocolysis should be used with caution when the fetus is remote from term because the expected prolongation of the pregnancy is limited, and the neonate has a minimal chance of survival at less than 23 weeks. The likelihood of survival is further reduced in the presence of significant medical complications, such as intra-amniotic infection (IAI) at these ages. On the other hand, the risk of neonatal mortality and morbidity is low after 34 completed weeks of gestation; although a trial of acute tocolysis may be initiated, aggressive tocolytic therapy is generally not recommended beyond 34 weeks, due to potential maternal complications. Between 24 and 33 weeks' gestation, benefits of tocolytic therapy are generally accepted to outweigh the risk of maternal and/or fetal complications and these agents should be initiated provided no contraindications exist. The following table depicts survival, major short-term morbidity, and intact long-term survival by gestational age.

Table. Neonatal Morbidity and Mortality by Gestational Age

Tocolytic agents have not proven to be efficacious in preventing preterm birth or reducing neonatal mortality or morbidity. The primary purpose of tocolytic therapy today is to delay delivery for 48 hours to allow the maximum benefit of glucocorticoids to decrease the incidence of RDS. While tocolytics can be successful for 48 hours when membranes are intact, some clinical studies suggest that the effectiveness of tocolytics is only slightly better than bedrest and hydration, both of which have fewer adverse effects than tocolytic therapy.

Diagnosis

Contractions of sufficient frequency and intensity to effect progressive effacement and dilation of the cervix at 24-37 weeks' gestation are indicative of active preterm labor. If the diagnosis of preterm labor is suspected, but not confirmed, it may be prudent to first obtain a vaginal fetal fibronectin (FFN) sample before pelvic cervical examination. If the diagnosis of preterm labor becomes obvious after the pelvic examination, the FFN specimen can be subsequently discarded. However, if the diagnosis remains in doubt, the FFN specimen can be sent to the lab for analysis.

Criteria that indicate consideration of tocolytic therapy include more than 6 contractions per hour resulting in cervical change (transvaginal cervical length <2.5 cm, >80% cervical effacement, or cervical dilation >1 cm). If contractions are present without cervical change, management options include continued observation or therapeutic sleep (morphine sulphate 10-15 mg subcutaneous). If the FFN is negative and the contractions abate, the patient may be sent home with appropriate follow-up evaluation.

Assessment prior to tocolytic therapy

One should always attempt to determine gestational age by first identifying the first day of the last menstrual period (LMP) and confirming it by one or more of the following:

• Positive pregnancy test (home or clinic) prior to the expected date of the second missed period
  


• Uterine size determined by bimanual exam less than 12 weeks' gestation
  


• Doppler fetal heart tones noted prior to 12 weeks' gestation
  


• Ultrasonographic estimation of gestational age (ie, first trimester within 1 wk, second trimester within 2 wk, and third trimester within 3 wk)

When the LMP is not reliable, the gestational age is determined by the first ultrasonography. Following gestational age determination, assessment of fetal well-being, fetal growth, and evaluation of congenital anomaly should be conducted. Subspecialist consultation (MFM) is recommended in the presence of suspected fetal anomalies because tocolytics are contraindicated for any congenital anomaly incompatible with life. Tocolytics are not indicated in patients with either suspected or confirmed IAI. Use of tocolytics is relatively contraindicated when evidence of a hostile intrauterine environment exists, such as the following:

• Fetal growth restriction
  


• Oligohydramnios
  


• Nonreactive nonstress test results
  


• Positive contraction stress test results
  


• Absent or reversed diastolic flow upon Doppler examination of umbilical blood flow
  


• Repetitive severe variable decelerations
  


• Significant vaginal bleeding consistent with abruption, unless patient is stable and fetal well being established

Evaluate for the presence of genital tract infection

Tocolytics are contraindicated in the presence of symptomatic IAI. The definition of IAI infection (ie, chorioamnionitis) includes a temperature greater than 38.0°C (100.0°F) and 2 of the 5 following signs:

• WBC count greater than 15,000 cells/mm³
  


• Maternal tachycardia greater than 100 beats per minute (bpm)
  


• Fetal tachycardia greater than 160 bpm
  


• Tender uterus
  


• Foul-smelling discharge

In situations in which the diagnosis remains unclear, an amniocentesis for fluid culture (aerobic/anaerobic bacteria), Gram stain (bacteria present if Gram stain is positive or if WBC count is >50 cells/mm³), glucose level (positive if <15 mg/dL), or leukocyte esterase evaluation may be considered. However, amniocentesis may result in a false-positive FFN test result if the FFN is performed after amniocentesis.¹

Patients with preterm labor may be assessed for the presence or absence of lower genital tract infection.

• Sterile speculum examination for ruptured membranes
  


• Endocervical sampling for gonorrhea and chlamydia
  


• Vaginal fluid pH
  


• Wet smear for BV and trichomonal infection if indicated
  


• GBS culture
  


• Urinalysis and culture (if indicated)

Positive results are treated with appropriate antibiotics.

Assess for medical contraindications to tocolysis

Tocolytics should be used with considerable caution in pregnant patients with cardiac disease, especially those who require medication or have a history of congestive heart failure, cardiac surgery, significant pulmonary disease, renal failure, or maternal infection (ie, pneumonia, appendicitis, pyelonephritis). In these cases, it may be prudent to consult with an MFM specialist.

Specific tocolytic agents should not be used whenever known allergies exist. Indomethacin is contraindicated in the presence of aspirin-induced asthma, coagulopathy, or significant liver disease. Magnesium sulfate should not be used in conjunction with select medications, such as calcium channel blockers, or when myasthenia gravis or neuromuscular disorders exist. Beta-mimetics (eg, terbutaline) may be contraindicated in the presence of cardiac arrhythmia, valvular disease, and ischemic heart disease and may alter glucose homeostasis in patients with diabetes.

Fetal therapy

The administration of glucocorticoids is recommended in the absence of clinical infection whenever the gestational age is between 24 and 34 weeks. An attempt should be made to delay delivery for a minimum of 12 hours to obtain the maximum benefits of antenatal steroids. The recommended dosage of Betamethasone consists of 2 12 mg doses 24 hours apart while 4 doses of 6 mg of dexamethasone should be administered at 6-hour intervals. Whenever the following clinical conditions exist, the glucocorticoid regimen may require modification:

• In the presence of insulin-dependent or gestational diabetes, the provider should be prepared for control of blood sugars.
  


• In the event of an acutely distressed fetus, indicative of fetal hypoxia, the use of prophylactic steroids should not delay the delivery of an acutely distressed fetus.

The benefit of repeated courses of glucocorticoids is doubtful. Retrospective data indicate that fetal growth may be slowed after 3 courses of steroids, and routine repeated doses are not currently recommended.

Group B streptococci prophylaxis

All patients in preterm labor should be considered at high risk for neonatal GBS sepsis. Patients in preterm labor with the potential to deliver should receive prophylactic antibiotics against GBS, unless GBS culture is negative. Prophylactic antibiotics should be administered when the diagnosis of preterm labor is made and should be continued until delivery or for a minimum of 72 hours. Patients should be re-treated if preterm labor recurs or when the patient enters labor at term depending upon culture results.

TOCOLYTIC AGENTS

Section 6 of 9  

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction
• Risk of Preterm Labor
• Assessment of Risk During Pregnancy
• Management of Preterm Labor
• Tocolytic Agents
• Follow-up Care
• Acknowledgments
• References

The most common tocolytic agents used for the treatment of preterm labor are magnesium sulphate (MgSO4), indomethacin, and nifedipine. In the past, beta-mimetic agents, such as terbutaline or ritodrine, were the agents of choice, but in recent years their use has been significantly curtailed due to maternal and fetal side effects, such as maternal tachycardia, hyperglycemia, and palpitations The use of these agents can lead to pulmonary edema, myocardial ischemia, and cardiac arrhythmia. The tocolytic agents currently used to treat preterm labor appear to be equally efficacious in delaying delivery for at least 48 hours. While MgSO4 is associated with more maternal toxicity, indomethacin is associated with more fetal and neonatal toxicity.

Magnesium sulphate

Magnesium sulfate is widely used as the primary tocolytic agent because it has similar efficacy to terbutaline with far better tolerance. Common maternal side effects include flushing, nausea, headache, drowsiness, and blurred vision. The mother should be monitored for toxic effects, such as respiratory depression or even cardiac arrest, that can occur at supertherapeutic levels. In addition, magnesium sulfate readily crosses the placenta and may lead to respiratory and motor depression of the neonate.

The use of magnesium sulfate usually requires baseline maternal laboratory evaluation, including CBC count and serum creatinine level, urine output greater than 30 mL/h, normal vital signs, appropriate maternal mentation, normal deep tendon reflexes (DTRs), and clear lung fields following auscultation. The initial recommended loading dose is 4-6 g IV over 20 minutes, followed by a maintenance dose of 1-4 g/h depending on urine output and persistence of uterine contractions.

Maintenance of magnesium sulfate therapy requires careful assessment of maternal mentation, visual symptoms, DTRs, and cardiac rate with discontinuation whenever evidence of toxicity exists. Urine output should be carefully monitored and ideally maintained at greater than 50 mL/h. Limiting intravenous intake to prevent pulmonary edema may be prudent. Oral intake can be maintained at the discretion of the provider. Serum magnesium levels may be obtained 1 hour after the loading dose and then every 6 hours and the maintenance dosage should be titrated to maintain a serum level of 4-8 mg/dL.

Since the primary therapeutic goal of tocolysis is to delay preterm delivery within 48 hours from the initiation of steroid prophylaxis, little evidence suggests that extended MgSO4 therapy is beneficial. The authors recommend discontinuing magnesium sulfate therapy after 48 hours in most patients unless the gestational age is less than 28 weeks when a gain of an additional 3-4 days may significantly reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality. Due to the risk of toxicity, consulting an MFM specialist may be beneficial if magnesium sulfate is to be continued for more than 72 hours. Since no clinical evidence suggests that oral beta-mimetics, subcutaneous terbutaline pump, or oral magnesium compounds are effective in delaying preterm birth, alternative tocolysis is not currently recommended after the discontinuation of IV MgSO4 therapy.

When acute mild toxicity exists in the presence of normal urine output, magnesium sulfate should be temporarily discontinued until the serum magnesium level and DTRs return to normal. If the toxicity symptoms are life threatening, administering 1 g of calcium gluconate by slow intravenous push and strongly considering not reinstituting magnesium sulfate despite the return to normal levels is recommended.

Indomethacin

Indomethacin is an appropriate first-line tocolytic for the pregnant patient in early preterm labor (<30 wk) or preterm labor associated with polyhydramnios. A more significant inflammatory response in the membranes and decidua is observed at gestational ages less than 30 weeks compared with 30-36 weeks. Indomethacin reduces prostaglandin synthesis from decidual macrophages. The fetal renal effects of indomethacin may be beneficial to reduce polyhydramnios.

Prostaglandin synthetase inhibitors, such as indomethacin, have been shown to have efficacy similar to that of terbutaline but are associated with infrequent maternal side effects. However, these agents readily cross the placenta and can cause oligohydramnios due to a decrease in fetal renal blood flow if used for more than 48 hours. The administration of indomethacin is often limited to 48 hours, and baseline labs, including CBC count and liver function tests (LFTs), should be ordered prior to initiation of therapy. During treatment, urine output, maternal temperature, and amniotic fluid index (AFI) should be evaluated periodically. The initial recommended dose is 100 mg PR followed by 50 mg PO every 6 hours for 8 doses. If oligohydramnios occurs, the amniotic fluid usually reaccumulates when the indomethacin is stopped, but persistent fetal anuria, renal microcystic lesions, and neonatal death have been reported. Indomethacin can also cause premature closure or constriction of the ductus arteriosus. Since this effect is more common after 32 weeks' gestation, indomethacin therapy is not usually recommended after 32 weeks.

Nifedipine

Nifedipine, a calcium channel blocker, is commonly used to treat high blood pressure and heart disease because of its ability to inhibit contractility in smooth muscle cells by reducing calcium influx into cells. Consequently, nifedipine has emerged as an effective and safe alternative tocolytic agent for the management of preterm labor.  Despite its unlabeled status, several randomized studies have shown that the use of nifedipine in comparison with other tocolytics is associated with a more frequent successful prolongation of pregnancy, resulting in significantly fewer admissions of newborns to the neonatal intensive care unit, and may be associated with a lower incidence of RDS, necrotizing enterocolitis, and intraventricular hemorrhage.

A recommended initial dosage of nifedipine is 20 mg orally, followed by 20 mg orally after 30 minutes. If contractions persist, therapy can be continued with 20 mg orally every 3-8 hours for 48-72 hours with a maximum dose of 160 mg/d. After 72 hours, if maintenance is still required, long-acting nifedipine 30-60 mg daily can be used. Contraindications of nifedipine therapy include allergy to nifedipine, hypotension, hepatic dysfunction, concurrent use of beta-mimetics or MgSO4, transdermal nitrates, or other antihypertensive medication. Other commonly reported side effects of nifedipine are maternal tachycardia, palpitations, flushing, headaches, dizziness, and nausea. Continuous monitoring of the fetal heart rate is recommended as long as the patient has contractions; the patient's pulse and blood pressure should be carefully monitored. Pregnant women with liver disease should not be prescribed nifedipine.

FOLLOW-UP CARE

Section 7 of 9  

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction
• Risk of Preterm Labor
• Assessment of Risk During Pregnancy
• Management of Preterm Labor
• Tocolytic Agents
• Follow-up Care
• Acknowledgments
• References

A true episode of preterm labor becomes a powerful risk factor for recurrent preterm birth, in addition to other risk factors present prior to the current episode. The prior risk factor may have been modified; for example, infection may have been identified and treated or behavioral risk factors may have been modified. Little evidence indicates that prophylactic oral beta-mimetic, subcutaneous beta-mimetics, or oral magnesium gluconate reduce the incidence of recurrent preterm birth and therefore should not be prescribed.

Frequent contact, face-to-face or by telephone, with a knowledgeable provider appears to be as effective as home uterine activity monitoring (HUAM) or continued pharmacological therapy. Direct contact with the patient is supplemented by education and phone access to a knowledgeable, consistent provider. Some unique situations exist in which HUAM is still felt to be beneficial, including patients who are paraplegic and unable to appreciate any muscular contractions.

The goal of follow-up therapy is to maximally reduce recurrence risk and to speed the access to subspecialty care if preterm labor should recur.

Inpatient

Once the episode of preterm labor has been arrested, a gradual return to limited activity should be encouraged prior to hospital discharge. The following factors may influence the decision to discharge the patient:

• Cervical dilation  


• Fetal presentation


• Number of fetuses


• Gestational age  


• Access to the hospital


• Social support at home (transportation at all times, telephone)


• The ability to maintain limited activity and pelvic rest


• Good patient compliance

If the patient was referred to a subspecialty care facility, the local obstetrician and pediatrician should be comfortable with home management. If labor should recur, they may have to manage the rapid delivery of premature infant.

The patient should be informed regarding the signs and symptoms of recurrent preterm labor. The critical signs of recurrent preterm labor include contractions greater than 4 per hour, rhythmic back or thigh pain, increasing pelvic pressure, unusual discharge, vaginal spotting/bleeding, or rupture of membranes.

Outpatient

The provider should have increased contact with the patient, and the patient should be directed to a specific individual to report symptoms of preterm labor or complications. The contact may be via a combination of telephone contacts and office visits. When genital tract infection may have played a role in the preterm labor; a repeat culture may be recommended 2-4 weeks after discharge.

If inpatient tocolysis was unsuccessful and the patient delivered preterm, the patient and family should receive education concerning the etiology and risk of recurrence in subsequent pregnancies. Few etiologies exist for which prediction of subsequent preterm delivery in future pregnancies is 100% accurate. Time should be spent at the postpartum visit reviewing the patient's clinical history, laboratory data, and pathology reports. Preconceptual counseling may also be critical in the decision of the patient to again become pregnant and in managing her pregnancy.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Section 8 of 9  

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction
• Risk of Preterm Labor
• Assessment of Risk During Pregnancy
• Management of Preterm Labor
• Tocolytic Agents
• Follow-up Care
• Acknowledgments
• References

The authors and editors of eMedicine gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous author, Dr. Edward Newton, MD, to the development and writing of this article.

REFERENCES

Section 9 of 9

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction
• Risk of Preterm Labor
• Assessment of Risk During Pregnancy
• Management of Preterm Labor
• Tocolytic Agents
• Follow-up Care
• Acknowledgments
• References

1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Assessment of risk factors for preterm birth. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 31, October 2001. (Replaces Technical Bulletin number 206, June 1995; Committee Opinion number 172, May 1996; Committee Opinion number 187, September 1997; Committee Opinion number 198, February 1998; and Committee Opinion number 251, January 2001). Obstet Gynecol. Oct 2001;98(4):709-16. [Medline].
2. ACOG practice bulletin. Management of preterm labor. Number 43, May 2003. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. Jul 2003;82(1):127-35. [Medline].
3. Associated Press. US gets poor grades for newborn's survival. MSNBC. Available at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12699453/.
4. Eden RD, Penka A, Britt DW, Landsberger EJ, Evans MI. Re-evaluating the role of the MFM specialist: lead, follow, or get out of the way. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. Oct 2005;18(4):253-8. [Medline].
5. Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Das A, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med. Feb 29 1996;334(9):567-72. [Medline].
6. Durnwald CP, Walker H, Lundy JC, Iams JD. Rates of recurrent preterm birth by obstetrical history and cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Sep 2005;193(3 Pt 2):1170-4. [Medline].
7. Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Mercer BM, Moawad A, Thom E, Meis PJ, et al. The Preterm Prediction Study: recurrence risk of spontaneous preterm birth. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Am J Obstet Gynecol. May 1998;178(5):1035-40. [Medline].
8. Ross MG, Cousins L, Baxter-Jones R, Bemis-Heys R, Catanzarite V, Dowling D. Objective cervical portio length measurements: Consistency and efficacy of screening for a short cervix. J Reprod Med, In Press. 2007.
9. Owen J, Yost N, Berghella V, Thom E, Swain M, Dildy GA 3rd, et al. Mid-trimester endovaginal sonography in women at high risk for spontaneous preterm birth. JAMA. Sep 19 2001;286(11):1340-8. [Medline].
10. A multicenter randomized controlled trial of home uterine monitoring: active versus sham device. The Collaborative Home Uterine Monitoring Study (CHUMS) Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Oct 1995;173(4):1120-7. [Medline].
11. Bakketieg LS, Hoffman HJ. Epidemiology of preterm birth: Results of a longitudinal study in Norway. In: Preterm Labor. London, England: Butterworths; 1981.
12. Benedetti TJ. Maternal complications of parenteral beta-sympathomimetic therapy for premature labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jan 1 1983;145(1):1-6. [Medline].
13. Bouyer J, Papiernik E, Dreyfus J, Collin D, Winisdoerffer B, Gueguen S. Maturation signs of the cervix and prediction of preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. Aug 1986;68(2):209-14. [Medline].
14. Copper RL, Goldenberg RL, Das A, Elder N, Swain M, Norman G, et al. The preterm prediction study: maternal stress is associated with spontaneous preterm birth at less than thirty-five weeks' gestation. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Nov 1996;175(5):1286-92. [Medline].
15. Crowley PA. Antenatal corticosteroid therapy: a meta-analysis of the randomized trials, 1972 to 1994. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jul 1995;173(1):322-35. [Medline].
16. Fanaroff AA, Wright LL, Stevenson DK, Shankaran S, Donovan EF, Ehrenkranz RA, et al. Very-low-birth-weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, May 1991 through December 1992. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Nov 1995;173(5):1423-31. [Medline].
17. Gibbs RS, Romero R, Hillier SL, Eschenbach DA, Sweet RL. A review of premature birth and subclinical infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. May 1992;166(5):1515-28. [Medline].
18. Goldenberg RL, Iams JD, Mercer BM, Meis PJ, Moawad AH, Copper RL, et al. The preterm prediction study: the value of new vs standard risk factors in predicting early and all spontaneous preterm births. NICHD MFMU Network. Am J Public Health. Feb 1998;88(2):233-8. [Medline].
19. Goldenberg RL, Thom E, Moawad AH, Johnson F, Roberts J, Caritis SN. The preterm prediction study: fetal fibronectin, bacterial vaginosis, and peripartum infection. NICHD Maternal Fetal Medicine Units Network. Obstet Gynecol. May 1996;87(5 Pt 1):656-60. [Medline].
20. Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Randomized controlled trials of home uterine activity monitoring: a review and critique. Obstet Gynecol. Jan 1992;79(1):137-42. [Medline].
21. Gyetvai K, Hannah ME, Hodnett ED, Ohlsson A. Tocolytics for preterm labor: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. Nov 1999;94(5 Pt 2):869-77. [Medline].
22. Hauth JC, Macpherson C, Carey JC, Klebanoff MA, Hillier SL, Ernest JM, et al. Early pregnancy threshold vaginal pH and Gram stain scores predictive of subsequent preterm birth in asymptomatic women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Mar 2003;188(3):831-5. [Medline].
23. Hediger ML, Scholl TO, Belsky DH, Ances IG, Salmon RW. Patterns of weight gain in adolescent pregnancy: effects on birth weight and preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol. Jul 1989;74(1):6-12. [Medline].
24. Higby K, Xenakis EM, Pauerstein CJ. Do tocolytic agents stop preterm labor? A critical and comprehensive review of efficacy and safety. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Apr 1993;168(4):1247-56; discussion 1256-9. [Medline].
25. Katz M, Goodyear K, Creasy RK. Early signs and symptoms of preterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. May 1990;162(5):1150-3. [Medline].
26. Macones GA, Robinson CA. Is there justification for using indomethacin in preterm labor? An analysis of neonatal risks and benefits. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Oct 1997;177(4):819-24. [Medline].
27. Macones GA, Sehdev HM, Berlin M, Morgan MA, Berlin JA. Evidence for magnesium sulfate as a tocolytic agent. Obstet Gynecol Surv. Oct 1997;52(10):652-8. [Medline].
28. Mercer BM, Goldenberg RL, Das A, Moawad AH, Iams JD, Meis PJ, et al. The preterm prediction study: a clinical risk assessment system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jun 1996;174(6):1885-93; discussion 1893-5. [Medline].
29. Nageotte MP, Dorchester W, Porto M, Keegan KA Jr, Freeman RK. Quantitation of uterine activity preceding preterm, term, and postterm labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jun 1988;158(6 Pt 1):1254-9. [Medline].
30. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference. Effect of glucocorticosteroids for fetal maturation on perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173:246-50.
31. Norton ME, Merrill J, Cooper BA, Kuller JA, Clyman RI. Neonatal complications after the administration of indomethacin for preterm labor. N Engl J Med. Nov 25 1993;329(22):1602-7. [Medline].
32. Papatsonis DN, Van Geijn HP, Ader HJ, Lange FM, Bleker OP, Dekker GA. Nifedipine and ritodrine in the management of preterm labor: a randomized multicenter trial. Obstet Gynecol. Aug 1997;90(2):230-4. [Medline].
33. Papiernik E, Bouyer J, Dreyfus J, Collin D, Winisdorffer G, Guegen S, et al. Prevention of preterm births: a perinatal study in Haguenau, France. Pediatrics. Aug 1985;76(2):154-8. [Medline].
34. Rust OA, Bofill JA, Arriola RM, Andrew ME, Morrison JC. The clinical efficacy of oral tocolytic therapy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Oct 1996;175(4 Pt 1):838-42. [Medline].
35. Teitelman AM, Welch LS, Hellenbrand KG, Bracken MB. Effect of maternal work activity on preterm birth and low birth weight. Am J Epidemiol. Jan 1990;131(1):104-13. [Medline].
36. Treatment of preterm labor with the beta-adrenergic agonist ritodrine. The Canadian Preterm Labor Investigators Group. N Engl J Med. Jul 30 1992;327(5):308-12. [Medline].
37. Weerakul W, Chittacharoen A, Suthutvoravut S. Nifedipine versus terbutaline in management of preterm labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. Mar 2002;76(3):311-3. [Medline].
38. Yeast JD, Poskin M, Stockbauer JW, Shaffer S. Changing patterns in regionalization of perinatal care and the impact on neonatal mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol. Jan 1998;178(1 Pt 1):131-5. [Medline].

Article Last Updated: May 31, 2007