You are in: eMedicine Specialties >
Obstetrics and Gynecology > Gynecologic Oncology
Cervical Cancer
Article Last Updated: Dec 12, 2007
AUTHOR AND EDITOR INFORMATION
Section 1 of 10
Author: Agustin A Garcia, MD, Associate Professor of Medicine, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine
Agustin A Garcia is a member of the following medical societies: American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society for Medical Oncology
Editors: John J Kavanagh Jr, MD, Chief, Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gynecological and Medical Therapeutics, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas College of Medicine; Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine; A David Barnes, MD, PhD, MPH, FACOG, Consulting Staff, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mammoth Hospital, Mammoth Lakes, California, Pioneer Valley Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah, Warren General Hospital, Warren, Pennsylvania and Mountain West Hospital, Tooele, Utah; Frederick B Gaupp, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Family Practice, Hancock Medical Center; Michel E Rivlin, MD, Associate Professor, Coordinator, Quality Assurance/Quality Improvement, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Mississippi School of Medicine
Author and Editor Disclosure
Synonyms and related keywords:
cervical cancer, cervix cancer, gynecological cancer, gynecologic cancer, human papillomavirus, HPV, sexually transmitted disease, STD, vaginal cancer, vagina cancer, Papanicolaou tests, Pap smear
Background
Cervical cancer is the second most common malignancy in women worldwide, and it remains a leading cause of cancer-related death for women in developing countries. In the United States, cervical cancer is relatively uncommon. The incidence of invasive cervical cancer has declined steadily in the United States over the past few decades; however, it continues to rise in many developing countries. The change in the epidemiological trend in the United States has been attributed to mass screening with Papanicolaou tests.
Frequency
United States
In the United States, 11,150 new cases of cervical cancer are diagnosed each year. In addition, more than 50,000 cases of carcinoma in situ are diagnosed.
International
Internationally, 500,000 new cases are diagnosed each year.
Mortality/Morbidity
Of the 11,150 patients with cervical cancer, 3,670 will die from their disease each year in the United States. This represents 1.3% of all cancer deaths and 6.5% of deaths from gynecologic cancers.
Race
In the United States, cervical cancer is more common in Hispanic, African American, and Native American women than in white women.
Sex
Cervical cancer is found only in women.
Age
Cervical cancers usually affect women of middle age or older, but it may be diagnosed in any reproductive-aged woman.
History
- Because women are screened routinely, the most common finding is an abnormal Papanicolaou test result.
- Clinically, the first symptom is abnormal vaginal bleeding, usually postcoital.
- Vaginal discomfort, malodorous discharge, and dysuria are not uncommon.
- The tumor grows by extending upward to the endometrial cavity, downward to the vagina, and laterally to the pelvic wall. It can invade the bladder and rectum directly.
- Symptoms that can evolve, such as constipation, hematuria, fistula, and ureteral obstruction with or without hydroureter or hydronephrosis, reflect local organ involvement.
- The triad of leg edema, pain, and hydronephrosis suggests pelvic wall involvement.
- The common sites for distant metastasis include extrapelvic lymph nodes, liver, lung, and bone.
Physical
- In patients with early-stage cervical cancer, physical examination findings can be relatively normal.
- As the disease progresses, the cervix may become abnormal in appearance, with gross erosion, ulcer, or mass. These abnormalities can extend to the vagina.
- Rectal examination may reveal an external mass or gross blood from tumor erosion.
- Bimanual examination findings often reveal pelvic metastasis.
- Leg edema suggests lymphatic/vascular obstruction from tumor.
- If the disease involves the liver, some patients develop hepatomegaly.
- Pulmonary metastasis usually is difficult to detect upon physical examination unless pleural effusion or bronchial obstruction becomes apparent.
Causes
Early epidemiological data demonstrated a direct causal relationship between cervical cancer and sexual activity. Major risk factors observed include sex at a young age, multiple sexual partners, promiscuous male partners, and history of sexually transmitted diseases. However, the search for a potential sexually transmitted carcinogen had been unsuccessful until breakthroughs in molecular biology enabled scientists to detect viral genome in cervical cells. Strong evidence now implicates human papillomaviruses (HPVs) as prime suspects. HPV viral DNA has been detected in more than 90% of squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) and invasive cervical cancers compared to a consistently lower percentage in controls. Both animal data and molecular biologic evidence confirm the malignant transformation potential of papilloma virus–induced lesions. SILs are found predominantly in younger women, while invasive cancers are detected more often in women aged 10-15 years older, suggesting slow progression of cancer. HPV infection occurs in a high percentage of sexually active women. Most of these infections clear spontaneously within months to a few years, and only a small proportion progress to cancer. This means that other crucial factors must be involved in the process of carcinogenesis. Three main factors have been postulated to influence the progression of low-grade SILs to high-grade SILs. These include the type and duration of viral infection, with high-risk HPV type and persistent infection predicting a higher risk for progression; host conditions that compromise immunity, such as multiparity or poor nutritional status; and environmental factors such as smoking, oral contraceptive use, or vitamin deficiencies. In addition, various gynecologic factors, including age of menarche, age of first intercourse, and number of sexual partners, significantly increase the risk for cervical cancer.
- Human papillomavirus
- HPV is a heterogeneous group of viruses that contain closed circular double-stranded DNA. The viral genome encodes 6 early open reading frame proteins (ie, E1, E2, E3, E4, E6, E7), which function as regulatory proteins, and 2 late open reading frame proteins (ie, L1, L2), which make up the viral capsid.
- To date, 77 different genotypes of HPV have been identified and cloned, among which, types 6, 11, 16, 18, 26, 31, 33, 35, 39, 42, 43, 44, 45, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 58, 59, 66, and 68 have the propensity to infect anogenital tissues.
- The HPVs that infect the human cervix fall into 2 broad categories. The low-risk types consist of HPV 6b and 11, which are associated with low-grade SILs but are never found in invasive cancer. The high-risk types, mostly HPV 16 and 18, are found in 50-80% of SILs and in up to 90% of invasive cancers. Although less common, types 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 68, 73, and 82 should also be considered carcinogenic.
- The major difference between the 2 types is that after infection, the low-risk HPVs are maintained as extrachromosomal DNA episomes, while the high-risk HPV genome is found integrated into the host cellular DNA. The recombination event often leaves E6 and E7 directly coupled to the viral promoter and enhancer sequences, allowing their continued expression after integration. Because E7 binds and inactivates the Rb protein while E6 binds p53 and directs its degradation, the functional loss of both TP53 and the RB genes leads to resistance to apoptosis, causing uncensored cell growth after DNA damage. This ultimately results in progression to malignancy.
- Human immunodeficiency virus
- The role of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in the pathogenesis of cervical cancer is not fully understood. Studies have shown a higher prevalence of HPV in HIV-seropositive women than in seronegative women, and the HPV prevalence was directly proportional to the severity of immunosuppression as measured by CD4 counts.
- Impaired lymphocyte function has been postulated to enhance latent or subclinical HPV activity, resulting in a higher rate of persistent infection.
- Whether HIV has a synergistic effect on HPV infection, either by direct molecular interaction or through an indirect immunologic effect, remains unclear.
Cervicitis
Endometrial Carcinoma
Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
Uterine Cancer
Vaginitis
Other Problems to be Considered
Cervicitis/infection, particularly granulomatous (rare)
Vaginal cancer
Metastatic cancer to cervix (rare)
Lab Studies
- A Papanicolaou test should be performed in every patient suggested to have a diagnosis of cervical cancer.
- The patient should be referred to a gynecologist for colposcopy, direct biopsies, and endocervical curettage.
- After the diagnosis is established, a complete blood cell count and serum chemistry for renal and hepatic functions should be ordered to look for abnormalities from possible metastatic disease.
Imaging Studies
- Once the diagnosis is established, imaging studies are performed for staging purposes.
- A routine chest radiograph should be obtained to help rule out pulmonary metastasis.
- CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis is performed to look for metastasis in the liver, lymph nodes, or other organs and to help rule out hydronephrosis/hydroureter.
- In patients with bulky primary tumor, barium enema studies can be used to evaluate extrinsic rectal compression from the cervical mass.
- The use of positron emission tomography (PET) scan is now recommended for patients with ³ stage IB2.
Other Tests
The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) guidelines for staging are limited to colposcopy, biopsy, conization of cervix, cystoscopy, and proctosigmoidoscopy.
In the United States, more complex radiologic imaging, such as CT, MRI, and PET scans as well as surgical staging, are often done to guide therapeutic options.
Procedures
- In patients with bulky primary tumor, cystoscopy and proctoscopy should be performed to help rule out local invasion of the bladder and the colon.
- Clinical staging protocols can fail to demonstrate pelvic and aortic lymph node involvement in 20-50% and 6-30% of patients, respectively. For that reason, surgical staging frequently is recommended. Pretreatment surgical staging is the most accurate method to determine the extent of disease. However, little evidence suggests an improvement in overall survival with routine surgical staging. Therefore, pretreatment surgical staging should be individualized after a thorough nonsurgical workup, including fine-needle aspiration of lymph nodes, has failed to demonstrate metastatic disease.
Histologic Findings
Precancerous lesions of the cervix usually are detected via Papanicolaou test. The Papanicolaou test classification system has evolved over the years. In 1988, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) sponsored a workshop to standardize Papanicolaou test reporting. Currently, cervical cytology results are reported according to the 2001 Bethesda System.
Table 1. 2001 Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical Cytologic Diagnoses
| Specimen adequacy (This may be the single most important quality assurance component of the system.)
Satisfactory for evaluation (note presence/absence of endocervical/transformation zone component)
Unsatisfactory for evaluation (specify reason)
Specimen rejected/not processed (specify reason)
Specimen processed and examined, but unsatisfactory for evaluation of epithelial abnormality because of (specify reason)
General categorization (optional)
Negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy
Epithelial cell abnormality
Other
Interpretation/result
Negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy
Observed organisms, such as Trichomonas, Candida, bacteria, and cellular changes consistent with herpes simplex virus, are reported.
Reporting other non-neoplastic findings is optional (ie, inflammation, atrophy)
Epithelial cell abnormalities
Squamous cell
Atypical squamous cells (ASC)
ASC of undetermined significance (ASCUS)
ASC, cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H)
Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL)
Encompassing: human papillomavirus/mild dysplasia/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1
High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL)
Encompassing: moderate and severe dysplasia, carcinoma in situ, CIN 2, and CIN 3
Squamous cell carcinoma
Glandular cell
Atypical glandular cells (AGC) (specify endocervical, endometrial, or not otherwise specified)
AGC, favor neoplastic (specify endocervical or not otherwise specified)
Endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS)
Adenocarcinoma
Other (List not comprehensive)
Endometrial cells in a woman aged 40 years or older
Automated review and ancillary testing (include as appropriate)
Educational notes and suggestions (optional)
|
General considerations
Complete evaluation should include Papanicolaou test with cytobrush and endocervical and endometrial samplings. If the smear result is suggestive of adenocarcinoma in situ, a cone biopsy should be performed. If the pathology still is unclear after the above workup, the patient should have dilatation and curettage.
Consideration should be given to obtaining ultrasound findings that adequately define the fallopian tubes and ovaries prior to defining uterine curettage to help identify primary malignancies of these organs.
Regarding invasive cervical cancer, the histology of cervical malignancy is predominantly of epithelial origin, with squamous cell carcinoma as the major group (85%). Less common histologies include adenocarcinoma, small cell carcinoma, melanoma, and lymphoma.
Staging
Two staging systems are frequently used in cervical cancer: FIGO, in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO), and the International Union Against Cancer (UICC).
Table 2. Cervical Cancer Staging (primary tumor [T])
| TNM Stage | FIGO Stage | | | Tx | - | Primary tumor cannot be assessed | | T0 | - | No evidence of primary tumor | | Tis | 0 | Carcinoma in situ | | T1 | I | Cervical carcinoma confined to uterus (extension to corpus should be disregarded) | | T1a | IA | Invasive carcinoma diagnosed only by microscopy. All macroscopically visible lesions--even with superficial invasion--are T1b/1B. Stromal invasion with a maximal depth of 5.0 mm measured from the base of the epithelium and a horizontal spread of 7.0 mm or less. Vascular space involvement, venous or lymphatic, does not affect classification. | | T1a1 | IA1 | Measured stromal invasion 3 mm or less in depth and 7 mm or less in lateral spread | | T1a2 | IA2 | Measured stromal invasion more than 3 mm but not more than 5 mm with a horizontal spread 7 mm or less | | T1b | IB | Clinically visible lesion confined to the cervix or microscopic lesion greater than IA2 | | T1b1 | IB1 | Clinically visible lesion 4 cm or less in greatest dimension | | | IB2 | Clinically visible lesion more than 4 cm | | T2 | II | Cervical carcinoma invades beyond uterus but not to pelvic wall or to the lower third of vagina | | T2a | IIA | Tumor without parametrial invasion | | T2b | IIB | Tumor with parametrial invasion | | T3 | III | Tumor extends to the pelvic wall and/or involves the lower third of the vagina and/or causes hydronephrosis or nonfunctioning kidney | | T3a | IIIA | Tumor involves lower third of vagina; no extension to pelvic wall | | T3b | IIIB | Tumor extends to pelvic wall and/or causes hydronephrosis or nonfunctioning kidney | | - | IV | Cervical carcinoma has extended beyond the true pelvis or has involved (biopsy proven) the bladder mucosa or rectal mucosa. Bullous edema does not qualify as a criteria for stage IV disease. | | T4 | IVA | Spread to adjacent organs (bladder, rectum, or both) | | M1 | IVB | Distant metastasis |
Regional lymph nodes (N), AJCC staging only, include paracervical, parametrial, hypogastric (obturator), common, internal and external iliac, presacral and sacral.
- NX: Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed.
- N0: No regional lymph nodes metastasis.
- N1: Regional lymph nodes metastasis.
Table 3. AJCC Stage Grouping | Stage | Tumor | Node | Metastasis | | 0 | Tis | N0 | M0 | | IA1 | T1a1 | N0 | M0 | | IA2 | T1a2 | N0 | M0 | | IB1 | T1b1 | N0 | M0 | | IIA | T2a | N0 | M0 | | IIB | T2b | N0 | M0 | | IIIA | T3a | N0 | M0 | | IIIB | T1 | N1 | M0 | | - | T2 | N1 | M0 | | - | T3a | N1 | M0 | | - | T3b | Any N | M0 | | IVA | T4 | Any N | M0 | | IVB | Any T | Any N | M1 |
Medical Care
The treatment of cervical cancer varies with the stage of the disease. For early invasive cancer, surgery is the treatment of choice. In more advanced cases, radiation combined with chemotherapy is the current standard of care. In patients with disseminated disease, chemotherapy or radiation provides symptom palliation.
- Stage 0: Treatment options for stage 0 cancer include loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), laser therapy, conization, and cryotherapy.
- Stage IA: The treatment of choice for stage IA disease is surgery—total hysterectomy, radical hysterectomy, and conization are accepted procedures. Intracavitary radiation is an option for selected patients.
- Stage IB or IIA
- For patients with stage IB or IIA disease, treatment options are either combined external beam radiation with brachytherapy or radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy.
- Radical trachelectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection is appropriate for fertility preservation in stage IA2 and B1.
- Most retrospective studies have shown equivalent survival rates for both procedures, although such studies usually are flawed due to patient selection bias and other compounding factors. However, a recent randomized study showed identical overall and disease-free survival rates.
- Quality-of-life data, particularly in the psychosexual area, is relatively scant.
- Postoperative radiation to the pelvis decreases the risk of local recurrence in patients with high-risk factors (positive pelvic nodes, positive surgical margins, and residual parametrial disease).
- A recent randomized trial showed that patients with parametrial involvement, positive pelvic nodes, or positive surgical margins benefit from a postoperative combination of cisplatin-containing chemotherapy and pelvic radiation.
- Stage IIB-IVA
- For locally advanced cervical carcinoma (stages IIB, III, and IVA), radiation therapy was the treatment of choice for many years. However, the results from large randomized clinical trials demonstrated a dramatic improvement in survival with the combined use of chemotherapy and radiation.
- For treatment with radiation alone, 5-year survival rates reportedly are 65-75%, 35-50%, and 15-20% for stages IIB, III, and IVA, respectively.
- Radiation therapy begins with a course of external beam radiation to reduce tumor mass to enable subsequent intracavitary application. Brachytherapy is delivered using afterloading applicators that are placed in the uterine cavity and vagina.
- The results of prospective, randomized, well-conducted studies of concurrent chemoradiation changed the standard of care in this group of patients.
- In the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial, 403 patients with bulky IB and IIB-IVA cancers were randomized to either radiotherapy to a pelvic and paraaortic field or pelvic radiation with concurrent cisplatin and fluorouracil. Rates of both disease-free survival and overall survival were significantly higher in the group that received combination treatment.
- Rose and associates conducted a Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) trial for patients with stage IIB, III, or IVA cancer, comparing the combination of radiation with 3 different chemotherapy regimens (cisplatin alone, cisplatin/5-fluorouracil/hydroxyurea, and hydroxyurea alone). Overall survival rates were significantly higher in the 2 groups that received cisplatin-containing regimens.1
- In another GOG trial, patients with bulky stage IB disease were randomized to either radiation alone or a combination of weekly cisplatin and radiation. All patients had adjuvant hysterectomy. Both disease-free survival and overall survival rates were significantly higher in the combined-therapy group at 4 years of follow-up.
- Based on the aforementioned study results, using cisplatin-based chemotherapy in combination with radiation for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer represents the standard of care.
- Stage IVB and recurrent cancer
- These patients are treated with chemotherapy. For many years, single agent cisplatin represented the standard of care. Recently, the combined use of cisplatin and topotecan was shown to significantly improve survival compared with single-agent cisplatin.
- Palliative radiation is often used individually to control bleeding, pelvic pain, or urinary or partial large bowel obstructions from pelvic disease.
- Total pelvic exenteration may be considered in patients with an isolated central pelvic recurrence.
Surgical Care
- Carcinoma in situ (stage 0) is treated with local ablative measures such as cryosurgery, laser ablation, and loop excision.
- Hysterectomy should be reserved for patients with other gynecologic indications to justify the procedure.
- After local treatment, these patients require lifelong surveillance.
- Palliative radiation often is used individually to control bleeding, pelvic pain, or urinary or partial large bowel obstructions from pelvic disease.
- Invasive procedures such as nephrostomy or diverting colostomy sometimes are performed in this group of patients to improve their quality of life.
- Special effort should be made to ensure comprehensive palliative care, including adequate pain control for these patients.
- The standard treatment for microinvasive disease (stage IA) is total hysterectomy.
- Lymph node dissection is not required if the depth of invasion is less than 3 mm and no lymphovascular invasion is noted.
- Selected patients with stage IA1 disease but no lymphovascular space invasion who desire to maintain fertility may have a therapeutic conization with close follow-up, including cytology, colposcopy, and endocervical curettage.
- Patients with medical comorbidities who are not surgical candidates can be successfully treated with radiation.
Consultations
- The treatment of cervical cancer frequently requires a multidisciplinary approach involving a gynecologic oncologist, radiation oncologist, and medical oncologist.
Diet
- Proper nutrition is important for patients with cervical cancer. Every attempt should be made to encourage and provide adequate oral food intake.
- Nutritional supplements such as Ensure or Boost are used when patients have had significant weight loss or cannot tolerate regular food due to nausea caused by radiation or chemotherapy.
- In patients with severe anorexia, appetite stimulants such as Megace can be prescribed.
- For patients who are unable to tolerate any oral intake, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes are placed for nutritional supplementation.
- In patients with extensive bowel obstruction as a result of metastatic cancer, hyperalimentation sometimes is used.
Chemotherapy should be administered in conjunction with radiation therapy to most patients with stage IB (high risk) to IVA. Cisplatin is the agent used most commonly, although 5-fluorouracil also is used frequently. For patients with metastatic disease, cisplatin remains the most active agent. Topotecan, ifosfamide, and paclitaxel also have significant activity in this setting. The combination of topotecan and cisplatin improves overall survival. However, acute toxicities are also increased.
Drug Category: Chemotherapy agents
Inhibit cell growth and proliferation.
| Drug Name | Cisplatin (Platinol) |
| Description | Intrastrand cross-linking of DNA and inhibition of DNA precursors are among proposed mechanisms of action. Used in combination with radiation therapy. |
| Adult Dose | 50-100 mg/m2 IV q3wk 40 mg/m2 IV qwk for 5 wk |
| Pediatric Dose | Not established |
| Contraindications | Documented hypersensitivity; renal failure; peripheral neuropathy; bone marrow suppression |
| Interactions | Decreases elimination of bleomycin |
| Pregnancy | D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus
|
| Precautions | Peripheral neuropathy and myelosuppression may occur; IV hydration decreases risk of nephrotoxicity; selective serotonin antagonists and steroids can be used for prophylaxis against nausea/vomiting |
| Drug Name | 5-Fluorouracil (Efudex, Adrucil, Fluoroplex) |
| Description | Pyrimidine antagonist. Several mechanisms of action have been proposed, including inhibition of thymidylate synthase and inhibition of RNA synthesis. Also is a potent radiosensitizer. |
| Adult Dose | 225 mg/m2/d continuous IV for 5 wk |
| Pediatric Dose | Not established |
| Contraindications | Documented hypersensitivity; myelosuppression; acute active infection |
| Interactions | May increase effects of anticoagulants, immunosuppressives, NSAIDs, platelet inhibitors, and thrombolytics |
| Pregnancy | D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus
|
| Precautions | Inflammatory reactions may occur with occlusive dressings; porous gauze dressing may be applied for cosmetic reasons, without increase in reaction |
| Drug Name | Ifosfamide (Ifex) |
| Description | Forms DNA interstrand and intrastrand bonds that interfere with protein synthesis. |
| Adult Dose | 5 g/m2 IV over 24 h q3wk |
| Pediatric Dose | Not established |
| Contraindications | Documented hypersensitivity; renal/hepatic failure; bone marrow suppression |
| Interactions | Phenobarbital, phenytoin, chloral hydrate, and other drugs that interfere with cytochrome P-450 activity may alter effects |
| Pregnancy | D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus
|
| Precautions | May cause hemorrhagic cystitis and severe myelosuppression; caution in renal function impairment or compromised bone marrow reserve |
| Drug Name | Paclitaxel (Taxol) |
| Description | Mechanisms of action are tubulin polymerization and microtubule stabilization. |
| Adult Dose | 175 mg/m2 IV over 3 h q3wk; alternatively, 135 mg/m2 IV over 24 h q3wk |
| Pediatric Dose | Not established |
| Contraindications | Documented hypersensitivity to paclitaxel or polyoxyethylated castor oil; peripheral neuropathy; bone marrow suppression; liver failure; severe cardiac disease |
| Interactions | Coadministration with cisplatin may further increase myelosuppression |
| Pregnancy | D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus
|
| Precautions | Premedicate with steroids, H1 blockers, and H2 blockers to decrease risk of hypersensitivity reactions; myelosuppression, alopecia, arthralgia/myalgias, and cardiac arrhythmia may occur |
| Drug Name | Topotecan |
| Description | Inhibits topoisomerase I, inhibiting DNA replication. Patients who have received prior chemotherapy should be given a lower dose initially. |
| Adult Dose | 1.5 mg/m2/d IV for 5 d q4wk |
| Pediatric Dose | Not established |
| Contraindications | Documented hypersensitivity; bone marrow suppression and renal function impairment |
| Interactions | Concomitant administration with other antineoplastics may result in prolonged neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in addition to increased morbidity/mortality |
| Pregnancy | D - Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus
|
| Precautions | Side effects include myelosuppression, dermatitis, nausea, and vomiting; monitor bone marrow function |
Drug Category: Vaccines
A human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine is now available for prevention of HPV-associated dysplasias and neoplasias, including cervical cancer, genital warts (condyloma acuminata), and precancerous genital lesions. The immunization series should be completed in girls and young women aged 9-26 years.
| Drug Name | Papillomavirus vaccine (Gardasil) |
| Description | Quadrivalent HPV recombinant vaccine. First vaccine indicated to prevent cervical cancer, genital warts (condyloma acuminata), and precancerous genital lesions (eg, cervical adenocarcinoma in situ; cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 1, 2, and 3; vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3; vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3) due to HPV types 6, 11, 16, and 18. Vaccine efficacy mediated by humoral immune responses following immunization series. |
| Adult Dose | < 26 years: 0.5 mL IM administered as 3 separate doses; administer second and third doses 2 and 6 mo after first dose, respectively >26 years: Not established |
| Pediatric Dose | <9 years: Not established >9 years: Administer as in adults |
| Contraindications | Documented hypersensitivity |
| Interactions | Immunosuppressive therapies (eg, irradiation, antineoplastic agents, corticosteroids) may decrease immune response to vaccine |
| Pregnancy | B - Fetal risk not confirmed in studies in humans but has been shown in some studies in animals
|
| Precautions | Shake well before administering; administer in deltoid region of upper arm or in higher anterolateral thigh; individuals with impaired immune responsiveness (eg, HIV infection, neoplastic disease, currently taking immunosuppressive drugs) may not elicit antibody response; because of IM administration, do not administer to individuals with bleeding disorders (eg, thrombocytopenia, coagulation disorders, anticoagulant therapy); common adverse effects include pain, swelling, erythema, and/or pruritus at injection site and fever |
Deterrence/Prevention
- Screening of cervical cancer
- For many years, the standard method for cervical cancer screening has been the Papanicolaou test. Retrospective data have shown that screening with a Papanicolaou test reduces the incidence rate of cervical cancer by 60-90% and the death rate by 90%.
- The false-negative rate of a Papanicolaou test is 20%, which mostly results from sampling error. Physicians can reduce sampling error by ensuring adequate material is taken from both the endocervical canal and the ectocervix. Smears without endocervical or metaplastic cells must be repeated. Upon physical examination, suspicious or grossly abnormal cervical lesions should undergo biopsy regardless of cytologic findings.
- Recently, new technologies have become available. Limited information is available regarding their sensitivity and specificity (compared with the conventional Papanicolaou test). Whether these new methods improve survival, compared with the conventional Papanicolaou test, is unknown.
- Since its introduction more than 50 years ago, the use of the Papanicolaou test for cervical screening has reduced mortality by 70%. Nonetheless, the mortality rate in the United States has remained relatively constant during the last 25 years. One of the factors to explain this has been described as limitations of the traditional Papanicolaou test method itself.
- The limitations of the conventional Papanicolaou test include limited sensitivity (51%) and a significant proportion of inadequate specimens. In addition, accurate interpretation of conventional Papanicolaou tests are often compromised by the presence of artifacts (such as blood, mucus, obscuring inflammation, scant cellular material, and air-drying artifact).
- ThinPrep test: The ThinPrep test samples are collected the same way as the conventional Papanicolaou test. However, the specimen is placed in a preservative solution rather than on a slide. An automated processor prepares the sample and makes a uniform slide for review. Mucous and blood are removed in the process. The ThinPrep Papanicolaou test was approved in 1996 as an alternative to the traditional conventional smear.
- HPV testing: The Hybrid Capture II HPV test was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as a new approach for cervical cancer in 2003. This test is indicated for women aged 30 years and older, in conjunction with the Papanicolaou test. If both tests are negative, then the next Papanicolaou test can be delayed for 3 years.
- The HPV test is also useful to interpret equivocal results from a Papanicolaou test. If a women has an ASCUS Papanicolaou test result and a positive HPV test, then additional work up with a colposcopy is indicated.
- Screening recommendations are as follows:
- The American Cancer Society and US Preventive Services Task Force recommend that all women should begin screening for cervical cancer approximately 3 years after they begin to have vaginal intercourse, but no later than age 21.
- Beginning at age 30, women who have had 3 normal consecutive Papanicolaou test results may get screening every 2-3 years. Women with high risk factors (DES exposure, HIV infection, or other immunodeficiencies) should continue yearly screening.
- Another option for women aged 30 years and older is to get screened every 3 years with the conventional- or liquid-based Papanicolaou test plus HPV DNA test.
- Women aged 70 years and older with 3 or more normal consecutive Papanicolaou test results and no abnormal Papanicolaou test results within the last 10 years may choose to stop having cervical cancer screening.
- Women who have had a total hysterectomy may stop having cervical cancer screening. Exceptions are those who had a hysterectomy due to cervical carcinoma (or preinvasive changes) and women who had a hysterectomy without removal of the cervix.
- Prevention: Several measures are effective to prevent HPV infection and hence prevent cervical cancer.
- Sexual abstinence
- Barrier protection and/or spermicidal gels during sexual intercourse
- Vaccination: Evidence suggests that HPV vaccines prevent HPV infection. A vaccine for HPV has been recently approved by the FDA.
Complications
- Complications from radiation alone
- During the acute phase of pelvic radiation, the surrounding normal tissues such as the intestines, the bladder, and the perineum skin often are affected.
- Acute adverse gastrointestinal effects include diarrhea, abdominal cramping, rectal discomfort, or bleeding. Diarrhea usually is controlled by either loperamide (Imodium) or atropine sulfate (Lomotil). Small, steroid-containing enemas are prescribed to alleviate symptoms from proctitis.
- Cystourethritis also can occur, which leads to dysuria, frequency, and nocturia. Antispasmodics often are helpful for symptom relief.
- Urine should be examined for possible infection. If urinary tract infection is diagnosed, therapy should be instituted without delay.
- Proper skin hygiene should be maintained for the perineum, and topical lotion should be used in case erythema or desquamation occurs.
- Late sequelae of radiation usually appear 1-4 years after treatment. The major sequelae include rectal or vaginal stenosis, small bowel obstruction, malabsorption, and chronic cystitis.
- Complications from surgery
- The most frequent complication of radical hysterectomy is urinary dysfunction as a result of partial denervation of the detrusor muscle.
- Other complications include foreshortened vagina, ureterovaginal fistula, hemorrhage, infection, bowel obstruction, stricture and fibrosis of the intestine or rectosigmoid colon, and bladder and rectovaginal fistulas.
Prognosis
Prognosis of cervical cancer depends on disease stage. In general, the 5-year survival rate for stage I disease is higher than 90%, for stage II is 60-80%, for stage III is approximately 50%, and for stage IV disease is less than 30%.
Patient Education
The authors and editors of eMedicine gratefully acknowledge the contributions of previous authors Omid Hamid and Anthony El-Khoueiry to the development and writing of this article.
- Rose PG, Bundy BN, Watkins EB, Thigpen JT, Deppe G, Maiman MA. Concurrent cisplatin-based radiotherapy and chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. Apr 15 1999;340(15):1144-53. [Medline].
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists. Number 61, April 2005. Human papillomavirus. Obstet Gynecol. Apr 2005;105(4):905-18. [Medline].
- Anhang R, Goodman A, Goldie SJ. HPV communication: review of existing research and recommendations for patient education. CA Cancer J Clin. Sep-Oct 2004;54(5):248-59. [Medline].
- Arends MJ, Wyllie AH, Bird CC. Papillomaviruses and human cancer. Hum Pathol. Jul 1990;21(7):686-98. [Medline].
- Clavel C, Masure M, Bory JP, et al. Human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for the detection of high-grade cervical lesions: a study of 7932 women. Br J Cancer. Jun 15 2001;84(12):1616-23. [Medline].
- Hutchinson ML, Zahniser DJ, Sherman ME, Herrero R, Alfaro M, Bratti MC. Utility of liquid-based cytology for cervical carcinoma screening: results of a population-based study conducted in a region of Costa Rica with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma. Cancer. Apr 25 1999;87(2):48-55. [Medline].
- Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin. Jan-Feb 2007;57(1):43-66. [Medline].
- Keys HM, Bundy BN, Stehman FB. Cisplatin, radiation, and adjuvant hysterectomy compared with radiation and adjuvant hysterectomy for bulky stage IB cervical carcinoma. N Engl J Med. Apr 15 1999;340(15):1154-61. [Medline].
- Koutsky LA, Ault KA, Wheeler CM, et al. A controlled trial of a human papillomavirus type 16 vaccine. N Engl J Med. Nov 21 2002;347(21):1645-51. [Medline].
- Long HJ 3rd, Bundy BN, Grendys EC Jr, Benda JA, McMeekin DS, Sorosky J. Randomized phase III trial of cisplatin with or without topotecan in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. Jul 20 2005;23(21):4626-33. [Medline].
- Morris M, Eifel PJ, Lu J. Pelvic radiation with concurrent chemotherapy compared with pelvic and para-aortic radiation for high-risk cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. Apr 15 1999;340(15):1137-43. [Medline].
- Munoz N, Bosch FX, de Sanjose S, et al. Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. Feb 6 2003;348(6):518-27. [Medline].
- Omura GA, Blessing JA, Vaccarello L. Randomized trial of cisplatin versus cisplatin plus mitolactol versus cisplatin plus ifosfamide in advanced squamous carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. Jan 1997;15(1):165-71. [Medline].
- Park TW, Fujiwara H, Wright TC. Molecular biology of cervical cancer and its precursors. Cancer. Nov 15 1995;76(10 Suppl):1902-13. [Medline].
- Saslow D, Castle PE, Cox JT, Davey DD, Einstein MH, Ferris DG, et al. American Cancer Society Guideline for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine use to prevent cervical cancer and its precursors. CA Cancer J Clin. Jan-Feb 2007;57(1):7-28. [Medline].
- Schiffman MH, Bauer HM, Hoover RN. Epidemiologic evidence showing that human papillomavirus infection causes most cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst. Jun 16 1993;85(12):958-64. [Medline].
- Sedlis A, Bundy BN, Rotman MZ. A randomized trial of pelvic radiation therapy versus no further therapy in selected patients with stage IB carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. May 1999;73(2):177-83. [Medline].
- Solomon D, Breen N, McNeel T. Cervical cancer screening rates in the United States and the potential impact of implementation of screening guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin. Mar-Apr 2007;57(2):105-11. [Medline].
- Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, et al. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA. Apr 24 2002;287(16):2114-9. [Medline].
- The ALTS group. Human papillomavirus testing for triage of women with cytologic evidence of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: baseline data from a randomized trial. The Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance/Low-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Les. J Natl Cancer Inst. Mar 1 2000;92(5):397-402. [Medline].
- Thigpen JT, Vance R, Puneky L. Chemotherapy as a palliative treatment in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Semin Oncol. Apr 1995;22(2 Suppl 3):16-24. [Medline].
- Wong JG, Feussner JR. Screening for cervical cancer. Pap smears can save lives. N C Med J. Jul 1993;54(7):342-5. [Medline].
- Wright TC, Cox JT, Massad LS, et al. 2001 Consensus Guidelines for the management of women with cervical cytological abnormalities. JAMA. Apr 24 2002;287(16):2120-9. [Medline].
Cervical Cancer excerpt Article Last Updated: Dec 12, 2007
|