Continually Updated Clinical Reference
 
 
  All Sources     eMedicine     Medscape     Drug Reference     MEDLINE
 
eMedicine - Cauda Equina : Article by

Quick Find
Authors & Editors
Introduction
RELEVANT ANATOMY
Workup
Treatment
Complications
Outcome And Prognosis
Future And Controversies
References




Patient Education
Back, Ribs, Neck, and Head Center

Brain and Nervous System Center

Lumbar Laminectomy Introduction

Lumbar Laminectomy Preparation

Cauda Equina Syndrome




Author: Nazer H Qureshi, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

Nazer H Qureshi is a member of the following medical societies: American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, and World Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery

Coauthor(s): T Glenn Pait, MD, FACS, Associate Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jackson T Stephens Chair, Spine Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; Director, Jackson T Stephens Spine and Neurosciences Institute; Emad Soliman, MD, MSc, Consulting Staff, Department of Neurology, St John's Riverside Hospital

Editors: Duc Hoang Duong, MD, Director of Neuroscience Physician Assistant Program, Associate Professor, Departments of Neurological Surgery and Neuroscience, Epilepsy Center, Charles R Drew University; Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine; Ryszard M Pluta, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Neurosurgical Department Medical Research Center, Polish Academy of Sciences at Warsaw, Poland; Senior Researcher, Surgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH; Herbert H Engelhard III, MD, PhD, Director, UIC Neuro-Oncology Program, Chief, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Associate Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Illinois at Chicago; Allen R Wyler, MD, Medical Director, Northstar Neuroscience, Inc

Author and Editor Disclosure

Synonyms and related keywords: CE, cauda equina syndrome, CES, low back pain, steroid, epidural, conus medullaris syndrome, spinal stenosis, nerve root, sciatica, lumbar laminectomy, multiple myeloma, metastatic spinal disease, arthritis, degenerative arthritic lumbar stenosis

The cauda equina (CE) is a collection of intradural nerve roots at the end of the spinal cord. Cauda is Latin for tail, and equina is Latin for horse, ie, the "horse's tail." The spinal cord is the downward continuation of medulla that starts just below the foramen magnum and ends at the intervertebral disc between the first and second lumbar vertebrae as a tapered structure called the conus medullaris, consisting of sacral spinal cord segments. It provides sensory innervation to the saddle area, motor innervation to the sphincters, and parasympathetic innervation to the bladder and lower bowel, ie, from the left splenic flexure to the rectum.

The nerves in the CE region include lower lumbar and all of the sacral nerve roots. The pelvic splanchnic nerves carry preganglionic parasympathetic fibers from S2-S4 to innervate the detrusor muscle of urinary bladder. Conversely, somatic lower motoneurons from S2-S4 innervate the voluntary muscles of the external anal sphincter and the urethral sphincter via the inferior rectal and the perineal branches of the pudendal nerve, respectively. Hence, the nerve roots in the CE region carry sensations from the lower extremities, perineal dermatomes, and outgoing motor fibers to the lower extremity myotomes. A thin threadlike continuation of the conus, the filum terminale, is a nonneural element in the CE region that extends down to the coccyx.

CE syndrome (CES) is caused by the loss of functions of 2 or more of the 18 nerve roots that constitute the CE. It is defined as a complex of symptoms that include lower back pain, unilateral or more typically bilateral sciatica, saddle sensory disturbances, and variable lower extremity motor and sensory loss, along with bladder, bowel, and erectile dysfunction.

The onset of CES symptoms may be acute or somewhat chronic. The motor loss varies from weakness to flaccid paralysis over time with no upper motor neuron signs. Similarly, sensory symptoms include saddle anesthesia and a variable sensory loss in lower extremities from L3 to coccygeal-1 nerves, inclusively.

History Of The Procedure

The French anatomist Andreas Lazarius coined the term cauda equina in 1600.1 Other French physicians referred to CES early in the 20th century.2, 3

Frequency

In the United States, approximately 1-3% of patients who undergo spinal surgery for CES have either atraumatic or traumatic types of CES4. CES has no predilection for any race or either sex. Although CES can occur at any age, it is most often seen in adults in whom the spinal canal may already be compromised and stenosed.

Etiology

Numerous causes of CES have been reported, including disc herniation, intradural disc rupture, spinal stenosis secondary to other spinal conditions, traumatic injury, primary tumors such as ependymomas and schwannomas, metastatic tumors, infectious conditions,  arteriovenous malformation or hemorrhage, and iatrogenic causes.

Herniated disc

The reported incidence of CES due to herniated lumbar disc varies from 1-6%.5, 6, 7 CES secondary to disc herniation involves either a large central disc or an extruded disc fragment that compromises a significant amount of the spinal canal diameter.8 The presentation may be acute or that of a more protracted course, with the latter bearing a better prognosis.6

Intradural disc rupture

Intradural disc rupture has been responsible for causing CES.9 Myelography in these instances typically demonstrates a complete block of the contrast material. If an intradural disc fragment is identified, transdural removal of the extruded disc fragment may be helpful to prevent further stretching of the already compromised nerve root.

Spinal stenosis and other spinal disorders

Although unusual, spinal stenosis secondary to other spinal disorders such as ankylosing spondylitis, spondylosis, and spondylolisthesis have all been reported with CES.10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16

Trauma

CES secondary to fractures and spondylolytic spondylolisthesis due to major trauma has been reported (Harrop, 2004; Fisher, 1988; Schizas, 2003; Thongtrangan, 2004). Injuries that cause CES are usually unstable and require internal fixation. Acute and delayed presentations of CES due to hematomas and arachnoid cysts have also been reported (Kebaish, 2004; Chen, 2001; Zuccarello; 1987).

Neoplasms

Both primary and metastatic spinal neoplasms have caused CES. Among the primary tumors able to cause CES include myxopapillary ependymoma of filum terminale, schwannomas of the conus, and paraganglioma of the filum terminale.

Myxopapillary ependymoma is the most common tumor of the filum. Recovery of the function after surgery depends on the duration of symptoms and the presence or absence of sphincter dysfunction17 Paraganglioma of the filum, when present, needs to be differentiated from other tumors of this region.18 Although rare, this entity may present with CES. Schwannomas, whether solitary or as a part of a syndrome, may also cause CES if present at the level of the conus or filum terminale. Primary tumors that affect the sacrum, such as chordoma and giant cell tumor of the bone, may produce similar symptoms as a result of bony destruction and collapse.19

The incidence rate of metastatic lesions of the spine is increasing because of earlier diagnosis, better imaging, and more effective treatment modalities. Spinal metastases are most commonly seen in patients with lung cancer (40-85%), followed by those with breast cancer (11%), renal cell carcinoma (4%), lymphatic (3%), and colorectal cancer (3%).20 Although lung cancer is the most common of the spine metastases, in one study, only 0.7% of the lung cancer metastases to the spine produced CES because most of the metastatic lesions were not at the level of the CE.20 The CE region is also a favored site for drop metastases from intracranial ependymoma, germinoma, and other tumors.21 Other unusual metastatic spread from genitourinary and gynecologic cancer have also been reported at the conus region, causing neurological compromise.22

Infectious conditions

Infectious causes for CES may be pyogenic or nonpyogenic. Pyogenic abscesses are generally found in an immunocompromised or poorly nourished host. Staphylococcus aureus causes epidural abscesses in 25-60% of cases, but, recently, an increasing incidence of infections with methicillin-resistant S aureus, Pseudomonas species, and Escherichia coli have been recorded. A high index of suspicion is helpful in correct diagnosis and management23

Nonpyogenic causes for abscess are rare and include tuberculosis. Resurgence of tuberculosis secondary to immunocompromise in individuals with HIV requires a high index of suspicion in the indolent course of CES development.24 Other uncommon organisms, such as Nocardia asteroides and Streptococcus milleri, have also been reported as a cause of abscess that leads to the development of CES.25, 26

Iatrogenic causes

Medical and surgical situations such as bone screw fixation, fat grafts, lumbar arthrodesis for spondylolisthesis, lumbar discectomy, intradiscal therapy, lumbar puncture forming an epidural hematoma, chiropractic manipulation, and a bolus injection of anesthetic during spinal anesthesia have been related to the development of CES-like syndromes.6, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31

Pathophysiology

CES may result from any lesion that compresses the nerve roots of the CE, which are particularly susceptible to injury because of the poorly developed epineurium. When well developed, as in the peripheral nerves, the epineurium provides some protection against compressive and tensile stresses. In addition, the proximal portion of the nerve roots is a region of relative hypovascularity. Increased vascular permeability and subsequent diffusion from the surrounding cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) supplement the nutritional supply to the nerve roots in this region. This property of increased permeability may result in edema of the damaged nerve roots, further compounding the initial injury, which may seem mild at first.

Several studies of different animal models have assessed the pathophysiology of CES.32, 33 Olmarker et al, using a graded balloon pressure method in a porcine model of CES, reported that the venules in the CE region begin to compress at a pressure as low as 5 mm Hg and the arterioles begin to occlude as the balloon pressure surpasses the mean arterial pressure.34, 35, 36, 37, 38 Despite this, even a pressure as high as 200 mm Hg failed to completely shut off nutritional supply to the CE.

These studies showed that not only the magnitude but also the length and the speed of obstruction were also important in afflicting the damage to the CE region. Similar results were reported in other studies. Takahashi et al reported a reduction in blood flow to the intermediate nerve segment when 2 pressure points were applied along the path of the nerve in the CE39. Others have studied compound action potentials in afferent and efferent segments of nerves in the CE region after application of balloon compression.40, 41, 42 These studies reported that 0-50 mm Hg of pressure did not affect the action potentials (the threshold for disturbances in action potentials was 50-75 mm Hg), and significant deficits were observed when pressure rose to 100-200 mm Hg.

Clinical

Radicular pain is a common presentation in patients with CES, usually in association with radicular sensory loss (saddle anesthesia), asymmetric paraplegia with loss of tendon reflexes, muscle atrophy, and bladder dysfunction. The presentation is somewhat similar to and is often confused with conus and epiconus lesions. In CES, the peripheral nerve fibers from the sacral segments of the cord, as well as various lumbar dorsal and ventral nerve roots, may also be involved. This results in an asymmetric and higher distribution of motor and sensory symptoms and signs in the lower extremities. Incontinence of bowel and bladder is not severe and develops late for the same reason.

In conus and epiconus lesions, the sacral region neurons are destroyed. The destruction of these (S2-S4) neurons leads to an early and more severe involvement of bowel, urinary bladder, and sexual dysfunction than seen in those with CES. However, in contrast, for the same reason, the motor and sensory symptoms in the lower extremities are often not very severe and only the distal parts of the limb musculature are involved.

The anatomical proximity of the conus medullaris, the epiconus, and the CE can lead to 2 of these anatomical structures being involved via a single lesion, resulting in an overlap of symptomatology.

The salient features and findings of these 2 different entities are listed in the table below.

Cauda Equina Versus Conus Medullaris Syndrome
 

Features

Cauda Equina SyndromeConus Medullaris

Vertebral level

L2-sacrumL1-L2

Spinal level

Injury to the lumbosacral nerve rootsInjury of the sacral cord segment (conus and epiconus) and roots

Severity of symptoms and signs

Usually severeUsually not severe

Symmetry of symptoms and signs

Usually asymmetricUsually symmetric

Pain

Prominent, asymmetric, and radicularUsually bilateral and in the perineal area

Motor

Weakness to flaccid paralysisNormal motor function to mild or moderate weakness

Sensory

Saddle anesthesia, may be asymmetricSymmetric saddle distribution, sensory loss of pin prick, and temperature sensations (Tactile sensation is spared.)

Reflexes

Areflexic lower extremities; bulbocavernosus reflex is absent in low CE (sacral) lesionsAreflexic lower extremities
(If the epiconus is involved, patellar reflex may be absent, whereas bulbocavernosus reflex may be spared.)

Sphincter and sexual function 

Usually late and of lesser magnitude;
lower sacral roots involvement can cause bladder, bowel, and sexual dysfunction
Early and severe bowel, bladder, and sexual dysfunction that results in a reflexic bowel and bladder with impaired erection in males

EMG

Multiple root level involvement;   sphincters may also be involvedMostly normal lower extremity  with external anal sphincter involvement

Outcome

May be favorable compared with conus medullaris syndromeThe outcome may be less favorable than in  patients with CES



The spinal cord is the downward continuation of the medulla, starting at the foramen magnum. It descends to about the level of the second lumbar vertebra, tapering to a structure called the conus medullaris. A thin, threadlike continuation of the conus, the filum terminale, extends as far as the coccyx and is composed of nonnervous tissue.

The cord serves as a conduit for the ascending and descending fiber tracts that connect the peripheral and spinal nerves to the brain. The cord projects 31 pairs of spinal nerves on either side (8 cervical, 12 thoracic, 5 lumbar, 5 sacral, 1 coccygeal) that are connected to the peripheral nerves. A cross-section of the spinal cord reveals butterfly-shaped gray matter in the middle, surrounded by white matter. As in the cerebrum, the gray matter is composed of cell bodies. The white matter consists of various ascending and descending tracts of myelinated axon fibers, each with specific functions.



Lab Studies

In general, laboratory tests are not required for diagnosing cauda equina syndrome (CES) but may help in prognosticating a particular etiology. For example, a high erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein level should prompt consideration of infection as a probable cause of CES.

Imaging Studies

In addition to a complete history, physical examination, neurological evaluation, and baseline laboratory analyses, the diagnostic workup for a cauda equina (CE) disorder is radiological.

Radiography

Plain radiographs should be obtained to search for destructive changes, disc-space narrowing, or loss of spinal alignment.

Lumbar myelography

Myelography is no longer routinely performed because of the availability of MRI. However, they may be preferred in certain situations in which MRI is contraindicated (eg, a patient with a cardiac pacemaker). Obstruction of the flow of contrast dye over an area of compression helps to confirm the level of the suspected pathologic condition.

CT scan with or without contrast

A CT scan is often easier to obtain than a lumbar myelogram. A CT scan provides additional details about bone density and integrity, which is helpful in treatment planning, especially in spine cases in which stabilizing instrumentation is required after the offending agent is relieved from the CE region. CT scanning performed after myelography may demonstrate the blockage of contrast dye and delineate the pathologic condition better than CT scanning alone would.

MRI

MRI is the most helpful modality for the diagnosis of spinal disorders. MRI delineates the soft tissues, including neuronal structures and the offending pathologic condition. It is less helpful than a CT scan in evaluating bone architecture and spinal stability.

Radionuclide scanning

This is a helpful modality when dealing with osteomyelitis and infection of the spine in the setting of CES.

Positron emission tomography scan

Positron emission tomography (PET) in association with CT scanning has been touted as a useful modality in patients with CES and malignancies of the spine.43

Other Tests

Postvoid residual catheterization: Catheterization for residual urine volume may reveal urinary retention, suggesting a neurogenic bladder. More than 100 mL of urine should elicit consideration of CES.



Medical therapy

Therapy is directed at the underlying cause of cauda equina syndrome (CES). The effective role of medical treatment in CES depends on the etiology. In patients with infection, antibiotics may be an imporant therapeutic avenue. In patients with certain kinds of tumor growths within the spinal canal, steroids, antichemotherapeutic agents, and radiation therapy may be important therapeutic avenues.

Surgical therapy

The role of surgery is to relieve pressure from the nerves in the cauda equina (CE) region and to remove the offending elements. After spinal surgery, internal stabilization with fixation devices may be needed in the same operative setting or at a later date.

The timing of surgical decompression is controversial, with immediate, early, and late surgical decompression showing varying results. This concept is further discussed in Outcome and Prognosis.

Preoperative details

Routine preoperative care is recommended. The only purpose of preoperative care is to make sure that the patient gets to the operating room in the recommended time frame to maximize chances of a complete recovery.

Intraoperative Details

The intraoperative use of somatosensory and motor-evoked potentials (SSEPs) may be helpful in monitoring the patient.

Postoperative details

Routine postoperative care is necessary for all patients. The recovery time depends on the duration and the extent of symptoms of CES and a multitude of other factors, including the etiology. Postoperative physical and occupational therapies are often beneficial to the patient’s progress. Some patients may require inpatient or outpatient rehabilitation; therefore, a physical medicine and rehabilitation consultation should be considered early in the course of management.

Follow-up

If therapy is delayed, potential problems include residual weakness, incontinence, impotence, and sensory abnormalities. These problems may persist even with prompt decompression. Follow-up depends on the needs of the patient and recovery potential.



Ever-present adverse events of any spinal surgery include paralysis, along with urinary bladder, bowel, and sexual dysfunction. The specific risks of surgical complications for widely varied procedures and equally varied etiologies are beyond the scope of this article.



Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is not fatal. Morbidity from CES varies and depends on the etiology of the syndrome and when the symptoms began. The recovery of function generally starts with the relief of pain, followed by an improvement in sensory and motor functions. Bowel, bladder, and sexual functions are the least likely to return fully and take the longest time to show any sign of recovery This is because of the anterior wallerian degeneration of the sacral parasympathetic neurons and the relative sensitivity of unmyelinated parasympathetic fibers to compression compared with myelinated sensory and motor nerves.

The prognosis for CES improves if a definitive cause is identified and management is instituted early. Surgical decompression should be performed if the patient is medically stable and able to undergo the procedure.6, 7, 44, 45. The dictum was to operate emergently within 6 hours for CES,22 but several authors have argued over the clarity of the data.4, 6, 7, 45, 46 Hussain et al have recently reported no differences at a 16-month follow-up among patients who underwent surgery within 5 hours and those who underwent surgery within 24 hours.47 One study has reported significant differences in outcome when surgery was delayed for more than 24 hours.9 The main indicator is the onset of bladder paralysis. Thongtrangan et al reported that the bladder function in trauma-induced cases of CES, if expected to recover, would happen within 3 months.48



All forms of cauda equina syndrome (CES) require a multidisciplinary team approach, including physicians, radiologists, surgeons, physiatrists, and nurses, to provide the best possible outcome for patients. Unless the degree of suspicion is high, especially in indolent and incomplete cases, diagnosis and treatment could be delayed.4, 44



  1. Lazarius, A. Historia anatomica humani corporis . 1600, Becker: Frankfurt, Germany. 178.
  2. Dejerine, J. La claudication intermittente de la moelle epiniere. Presse Medicale,. 2. 1911:981-984.
  3. Roussy, G. and J. Lhermitte, Le. Blesseurs de la Moelle et de la Queue de Cheval . Paris: Masson: 1918.
  4. Kostuik JP. Medicolegal consequences of cauda equina syndrome: an overview. Neurosurg Focus. Jun 15 2004;16(6):e8. [Medline].
  5. Raaf J. Removal of protruded lumbar intervertebral discs. J Neurosurg. May 1970;32(5):604-11. [Medline].
  6. Kostuik JP, Harrington I, Alexander D, Rand W, Evans D. Cauda equina syndrome and lumbar disc herniation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Mar 1986;68(3):386-91. [Medline].
  7. Gleave JR, MacFarlane R. Prognosis for recovery of bladder function following lumbar central disc prolapse. Br J Neurosurg. 1990;4(3):205-9. [Medline].
  8. Scott PJ. Bladder paralysis in cauda equina lesions from disc prolapse. J Bone Joint Surg Br. May 1965;47:224-35. [Medline].
  9. Dinning TA, Schaeffer HR. Discogenic compression of the cauda equina: a surgical emergency. Aust N Z J Surg. Dec 1993;63(12):927-34. [Medline].
  10. Shaw M, Birch N. Facet joint cysts causing cauda equina compression. J Spinal Disord Tech. Oct 2004;17(5):442-5. [Medline].
  11. Ahn NU, Ahn UM, Nallamshetty L, Springer BD, Buchowski JM, Funches L, et al. Cauda equina syndrome in ankylosing spondylitis (the CES-AS syndrome): meta-analysis of outcomes after medical and surgical treatments. J Spinal Disord. Oct 2001;14(5):427-33. [Medline].
  12. Tullous MW, Skerhut HE, Story JL, Brown WE Jr, Eidelberg E, Dadsetan MR, et al. Cauda equina syndrome of long-standing ankylosing spondylitis. Case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg. Sep 1990;73(3):441-7. [Medline].
  13. Devlin GP, Sheppeard H. Cauda equina syndrome in ankylosing spondylitis diagnosed by computed tomography. N Z Med J. Oct 28 1987;100(834):651-2. [Medline].
  14. Rubenstein DJ, Ghelman B. Case report 477: Cauda equina syndrome (CES) complicating long-standing ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Skeletal Radiol. 1988;17(3):212-5. [Medline].
  15. Indrieri RJ. Lumbosacral stenosis and injury of the cauda equina. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. May 1988;18(3):697-710. [Medline].
  16. Baba H, Maezawa Y, Furusawa N, Imura S, Tomita K. The role of calcium deposition in the ligamentum flavum causing a cauda equina syndrome and lumbar radiculopathy. Paraplegia. Apr 1995;33(4):219-23. [Medline].
  17. Schweitzer JS, Batzdorf U. Ependymoma of the cauda equina region: diagnosis, treatment, and outcome in 15 patients. Neurosurgery. Feb 1992;30(2):202-7. [Medline].
  18. Anderson JR, Gullan RW. Paraganglioma of the cauda equina: a case report. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Jan 1987;50(1):100-3. [Medline].
  19. Bagley CA, Gokaslan ZL. Cauda equina syndrome caused by primary and metastatic neoplasms. Neurosurg Focus. Jun 15 2004;16(6):e3. [Medline].
  20. Ampil FL, Mills GM, Burton GV. A retrospective study of metastatic lung cancer compression of the cauda equina. Chest. Nov 2001;120(5):1754-5. [Medline].
  21. Natale M, Spennato P, Savarese L, Bocchetti A, Esposito S, Barbato R. Anaplastic oligodendroglioma presenting with drop metastases in the cauda equina. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. Aug 2005;107(5):417-20. [Medline].
  22. den Boon J, Avezaat CJ, van der Gaast A, Koops W, Huikeshoven FJ. Conus-cauda syndrome as a presenting symptom of endodermal sinus tumor of the ovary. Gynecol Oncol. Apr 1995;57(1):121-5. [Medline].
  23. Lenehan B, Sullivan P, Street J, Dudeney S. Epidural abscess causing cauda equina syndrome. Ir J Med Sci. Jul-Sep 2005;174(3):88-91. [Medline].
  24. Kapoor SK, Garg V, Dhaon BK, Jindal M. Tuberculosis of the posterior vertebral elements: a rare cause of compression of the cauda equina. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Feb 2005;87(2):391-4. [Medline].
  25. Faraj A, Krishna M, Mehdian SM. Cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbar spondylodiscitis caused by Streptococcus milleri. Eur Spine J. 1996;5(2):134-6. [Medline].
  26. Brecker SJ, Pugey CD. Nocardia asteroides infection of the cauda equina. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Feb 1988;51(2):309-11. [Medline].
  27. Liu YC, Wu RS, Wong CS. Unexpected complication of attempted epidural anaesthesia: cauda equina syndrome. Anaesth Intensive Care. Aug 2003;31(4):461-4. [Medline].
  28. Pouchot J, Si-Hassen C, Damade R, Bayeux MC, Mathieu A, Vinceneux P. Cauda equina compression by epidural lipomatosis in obesity. Effectiveness of weight reduction. J Rheumatol. Sep 1995;22(9):1771-5. [Medline].
  29. Diaz JH. Permanent paraparesis and cauda equina syndrome after epidural blood patch for postdural puncture headache. Anesthesiology. Jun 2002;96(6):1515-7. [Medline].
  30. Prusick VR, Lint DS, Bruder WJ. Cauda equina syndrome as a complication of free epidural fat-grafting. A report of two cases and a review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Sep 1988;70(8):1256-8. [Medline].
  31. Lambert DH. Bupivacaine spinal block cauda equina syndrome: why did it happen?. Anesthesiology. Jun 2005;102(6):1285-6; author reply 1287-8. [Medline].
  32. Delamarter RB, Bohlman HH, Dodge LD, Biro C. Experimental lumbar spinal stenosis. Analysis of the cortical evoked potentials, microvasculature, and histopathology. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Jan 1990;72(1):110-20. [Medline].
  33. Delamarter RB, Sherman JE, Carr JB. 1991 Volvo Award in experimental studies. Cauda equina syndrome: neurologic recovery following immediate, early, or late decompression. Spine. Sep 1991;16(9):1022-9. [Medline].
  34. Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Holm S. Edema formation in spinal nerve roots induced by experimental, graded compression. An experimental study on the pig cauda equina with special reference to differences in effects between rapid and slow onset of compression. Spine. Jun 1989;14(6):569-73. [Medline].
  35. Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Holm S, Bagge U. Effects of experimental graded compression on blood flow in spinal nerve roots. A vital microscopic study on the porcine cauda equina. J Orthop Res. 1989;7(6):817-23. [Medline].
  36. Olmarker K, Holm S, Rydevik B. Importance of compression onset rate for the degree of impairment of impulse propagation in experimental compression injury of the porcine cauda equina. Spine. May 1990;15(5):416-9. [Medline].
  37. Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Hansson T, Holm S. Compression-induced changes of the nutritional supply to the porcine cauda equina. J Spinal Disord. Mar 1990;3(1):25-9. [Medline].
  38. Olmarker K, Holm S, Rosenqvist AL, Rydevik B. Experimental nerve root compression. A model of acute, graded compression of the porcine cauda equina and an analysis of neural and vascular anatomy. Spine. Jan 1991;16(1):61-9. [Medline].
  39. Takahashi K, Olmarker K, Holm S, Porter RW, Rydevik B. Double-level cauda equina compression: an experimental study with continuous monitoring of intraneural blood flow in the porcine cauda equina. J Orthop Res. Jan 1993;11(1):104-9. [Medline].
  40. Rydevik BL, Pedowitz RA, Hargens AR, Swenson MR, Myers RR, Garfin SR. Effects of acute, graded compression on spinal nerve root function and structure. An experimental study of the pig cauda equina. Spine. May 1991;16(5):487-93. [Medline].
  41. Rydevik B. Neurophysiology of cauda equina compression. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1993;251:52-5. [Medline].
  42. Pedowitz RA, Garfin SR, Massie JB, Hargens AR, Swenson MR, Myers RR, et al. Effects of magnitude and duration of compression on spinal nerve root conduction. Spine. Feb 1992;17(2):194-9. [Medline].
  43. Metser U, Lerman H, Blank A, Lievshitz G, Bokstein F, Even-Sapir E. Malignant involvement of the spine: assessment by 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. Feb 2004;45(2):279-84. [Medline].
  44. Shapiro S. Medical realities of cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbar disc herniation. Spine. Feb 1 2000;25(3):348-51; discussion 352. [Medline].
  45. Gleave JR, Macfarlane R. Cauda equina syndrome: what is the relationship between timing of surgery and outcome?. Br J Neurosurg. Aug 2002;16(4):325-8. [Medline].
  46. Shapiro S. Cauda equina syndrome secondary to lumbar disc herniation. Neurosurgery. May 1993;32(5):743-6; discussion 746-7. [Medline].
  47. Hussain SA, Gullan RW, Chitnavis BP. Cauda equina syndrome: outcome and implications for management. Br J Neurosurg. Apr 2003;17(2):164-7. [Medline].
  48. Thongtrangan I, Le H, Park J, Kim DH. Cauda equina syndrome in patients with low lumbar fractures. Neurosurg Focus. Jun 15 2004;16(6):e6. [Medline].
  49. Chen HJ, Liang CL, Lu K, Liliang PC, Tsai YD. Cauda equina syndrome caused by delayed traumatic spinal subdural haematoma. Injury. Jul 2001;32(6):505-7. [Medline].
  50. Fisher RG. Sacral fracture with compression of cauda equina: surgical treatment. J Trauma. Dec 1988;28(12):1678-80. [Medline].
  51. Harrop JS, Hunt GE Jr, Vaccaro AR. Conus medullaris and cauda equina syndrome as a result of traumatic injuries: management principles. Neurosurg Focus. Jun 15 2004;16(6):e4. [Medline].
  52. Kebaish KM, Awad JN. Spinal epidural hematoma causing acute cauda equina syndrome. Neurosurg Focus. Jun 15 2004;16(6):e1. [Medline].
  53. Schizas C, Ballesteros C, Roy P. Cauda equina compression after trauma: an unusual presentation of spinal epidural lipoma. Spine. Apr 15 2003;28(8):E148-51. [Medline].
  54. Zuccarello M, Powers G, Tobler WD, Sawaya R, Hakim SZ. Chronic posttraumatic lumbar intradural arachnoid cyst with cauda equina compression: case report. Neurosurgery. Apr 1987;20(4):636-8. [Medline].

Cauda Equina excerpt

Article Last Updated: Jul 24, 2007