Continually Updated Clinical Reference
 
 
  All Sources     eMedicine     Medscape     Drug Reference     MEDLINE
 
eMedicine - Emphysematous Pyelonephritis : Article by

Quick Find
Authors & Editors
Introduction
Indications
Contraindications
Workup
Treatment
Complications
Outcome and Prognosis
Further Reading
Multimedia
References




Patient Education
Kidneys and Urinary System Center

Urinary Tract Infections Overview

Urinary Tract Infection Causes

Urinary Tract Infection Symptoms

Urinary Tract Infections Treatment




Author: Sugandh Shetty, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Urology, William Beaumont Hospital

Sugandh Shetty is a member of the following medical societies: American Urological Association

Editors: Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine; Ajay K Singh, MB, MRCP, MBA, Associate Professor of Medicine, Director of Dialysis, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Clinical Chief of Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital; J Stuart Wolf, Jr, MD, FACS, David A Bloom Professor of Urology, Director, Division of Minimally Invasive Urology, Department of Urology, University of Michigan Medical Center; Edward David Kim, MD, FACS, Professor of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine; Consulting Staff, University of Tennessee Medical Center

Author and Editor Disclosure

Synonyms and related keywords: emphysematous pyelonephritis, emphysematous pyelitis, gas-forming infection of the urinary tract, EPN, renal parenchyma infection, urinary tract infection, UTI, pneumaturia, renal emphysema, pneumo-nephritis, pneumonephritis, diabetes, xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis

Emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN) is a severe necrotizing infection of the renal parenchyma; it causes gas formation within the collecting system, renal parenchyma, and/or perirenal tissues. Gas in the renal pelvis alone, without parenchymal gas, is often referred to as emphysematous pyelitis. EPN is common in persons with diabetes, and the presentation of EPN is similar to that of acute pyelonephritis. However, the clinical course of EPN can be severe and life-threatening if not recognized and treated promptly.

The first case of pneumaturia was reported in 1898; since then, approximately 200 cases of EPN have been reported. Although most information has been from case reports, a few large series have also been reported. This article describes the pathogenesis, classification, complications, and management of EPN based on a review of 5 large series of 149 patients.1, 2, 3, 4, 5

History of the Procedure

Kelly and MacCullum reported the first case of pneumaturia from a gas-forming renal infection in 1898.6 Since then, several terms have been used to describe the condition, such as renal emphysema, pneumonephritis, and emphysematous pyelonephritis. The mortality rate associated with the condition was high before the advent of antibiotics; however, advances in imaging technology, control of diabetes, resuscitative management, and minimally invasive treatment have improved the outcome in patients with EPN. Although nephrectomy may be the quickest way of treating the infection source, renal function is compromised in many patients; therefore, a strategy to save nephrons may be very desirable. The above-mentioned series highlight such an approach, reserving nephrectomy for patients in whom conservative treatment does not elicit a response.

Frequency

EPN is a rare condition. Only 1-2 cases per year are encountered in a typical busy urological department in the United States. However, the frequency of reports from developing nations suggests that this may be a reflection of access to health care and health education. Because the condition preferentially affects persons with diabetes, the reported frequency reflects how poorly diabetes is controlled in these geographical areas. Renal stones is another predisposing condition and therefore affects the frequency of EPN.

Etiology

Among the bacteria associated with EPN, Escherichia coli is isolated in 66% of patients and Klebsiella species are reported in 26%. Proteus, Pseudomonas, and Streptococcus species are other organisms found in patients with EPN. Mixed organisms are observed in 10%. Positive blood culture results are identical to urine culture results in 54% of patients. Rare organisms such as Clostridium and Candida species have also been isolated in patients with EPN. Recently, Entamoeba histolytica and Aspergillus fumigatus have been reported as causes of EPN. Transplanted kidneys may be susceptible to EPN because of associated high-risk factors in the recipient such as diabetes and immunosuppression.7

Pathophysiology

EPN is a severe infection of the renal parenchyma that causes gas accumulation in the tissues. The infection often has a fulminating course and can be fatal if left untreated. However, urinary tract infections are common in persons with diabetes, and not all of these infections lead to EPN. The factors that predispose to EPN in persons with diabetes may include uncontrolled diabetes, high levels of glycosylated hemoglobin, and impaired host immune mechanisms. In 1993, Guiard proposed alcoholic fermentation of glucose with carbon dioxide production by the organisms as the cause of gas in the tissues.

In 1889, Muller first identified nitrogen, hydrogen, and carbon dioxide in a patient with pneumaturia. Schainuck et al proposed that fermentation products from tissue necrosis produced carbon dioxide.8 Three investigators analyzed the gas content, and all 3 demonstrated that the major components of the gas in EPN include nitrogen (60%), hydrogen (15%), carbon dioxide (5%), and oxygen (8%). Huang et al concluded that mixed acid fermentation is the mechanism of gas production based on the presence of hydrogen.9 Yang and Shen indicated that gas-forming infections depend on rapid tissue catabolism and impaired transport of the end products at the inflammatory site.10 Although carbon dioxide is released by the bacteria, the final tissue equilibrium achieved by tissues and gas bubbles determines the final carbon dioxide content. Diabetic microangiopathy may also contribute to the slow transport of catabolic products and may lead to accumulation of gas.

Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis, which is usually associated with stones in a nonfunctioning kidney with a severe gram-negative infection, is another septic condition very similar in presentation to EPN. Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis may also produce gas in the renal parenchyma and perinephric space, but generally not to the degree observed with EPN. The treatment of xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis is strictly surgical, requiring early nephrectomy because the kidney is already nonfunctional and is not worth saving.

Clinical

Epidemiology

The mean age of patients with EPN is reported as 55 years, with a range of 19-81 years. The condition is 6 times more common in women. Ninety-five percent of patients have diabetes. In most patients, the diabetes is uncontrolled, with high levels of glycosylated hemoglobin (72%) or high levels of blood sugar.

Rare cases have been reported in persons who do not have diabetes, with renal failure and immunosuppression as contributing factors. Of these patients, 22% have obstructed upper tracts, 4% have polycystic kidneys, and 4% have end-stage renal disease. Obstruction is the main cause of EPN in persons without diabetes. The left kidney is affected more commonly than the right. Bilateral cases have also been reported.

Physical

Patients typically present with fever (79%), abdominal or flank pain (71%), nausea and vomiting (17%), dyspnea (13%), acute renal impairment (35%), altered sensorium (19%), shock (29%), and thrombocytopenia (46%). Crepitus over the flank area may occur in advanced cases of EPN. Pneumaturia is uncommon unless emphysematous cystitis is present. Subcutaneous emphysema and pneumomediastinum have recently been reported in a case of EPN.11 Pregnancy can also be complicated by EPN.12 Bilateral EPN has also been reported. Coexisting comorbidities include alcoholism, malnourishment, renal calculi, and diabetic ketoacidosis.



Patients with emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN) should be treated with aggressive medical management and, possibly, prompt surgical intervention.

  • Conservative treatment - Percutaneous drainage with antibiotics
    • Those with compromised renal function
    • Early cases associated with gas in the collecting system alone and patient is in otherwise in stable condition
    • Class 1 and class 2 EPN
    • Class 3 and class 4 EPN - In the presence of fewer than 2 risk factors (eg, thrombocytopenia, elevated serum creatinine levels, altered sensorium, shock)
  • Surgical treatment - Nephrectomy
    • Treatment of choice for most patients
    • No access to percutaneous drainage or internal stenting (after patient is stabilized)
    • Gas in the renal parenchyma or "dry-type" EPN
    • Possibly bilateral nephrectomy in patients with bilateral EPN
    • Class 3 and class 4 EPN - In the presence of more than 2 risk factors (eg, thrombocytopenia, elevated serum creatinine, altered sensorium, shock)



No contraindications exist for the treatment of emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN). The infection often has a fulminating course and can be fatal if left untreated. However, surgical intervention should be performed only after stabilization of the cardiorespiratory status.



Lab Studies

  • A high index of suspicion is important when attempting to diagnose emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN) promptly.
  • Laboratory data reveal leukocytosis with a left shift, pyuria, infected urine, thrombocytopenia, an elevated creatinine level, and positive blood culture results.
  • Patients with urosepsis and shock should undergo cardiac and pulmonary function assessment as needed.

Imaging Studies

  • Patients should be stabilized with intravenous fluids and intravenous antibiotics prior to radiologic intervention.
  • Kidneys, ureter, and bladder imaging often reveals gas distribution over the region of the kidneys (see Images 1-2). In patients with emphysematous pyelitis, the collecting system may be filled with gas. An ileus pattern may be seen, suggesting retroperitoneal inflammation.
  • Renal sonograms often reveal high echogenic areas with dirty shadowing. Hydronephrosis and perinephric fluid may also be seen (see Image 3).
  • CT scanning is the definitive test. Several patterns have been described, including streaky, streaky and mottled, and streaky and bubbly. Gas can be rimlike or crescent-shaped in the perinephric area. Gas can also be seen in the renal vein or inferior vena cava (see Images 4-6). Gas can be seen along the psoas muscle. Perinephric abscess may also lead to significant gas accumulation in the perinephric space. A stone may be seen in the collecting system.
  • Radiological classification
    • In 1970, Langston and Pfister described 3 main radiographic patterns, as follows:13
      • Diffuse mottling of the renal parenchyma
      • Bubbly renal parenchyma surrounded by crescent-shaped gas in the perinephric space
      • Extension of gas through the Gerota fascia
    • In 1984, Michaeli et al suggested 3 stages of EPN, as follows:14
      • Stage I - Gas within the renal parenchyma or the perinephric tissue
      • Stage II - Presence of gas in the kidney and its surroundings
      • Stage III - Extension of gas through Gerota fascia or bilateral EPN
    • In 1996, Wan et al described 2 distinct types of EPN, as follows:15
      • Type I - Characterized by parenchymal destruction with streaky or mottled parenchymal gas with an absence of fluid collection, which has a fulminant course and high risk of mortality
      • Type II - Characterized by renal or perirenal fluid collection with bubbly gas collection in the perinephric space or in the collecting system and a mortality rate of 18% (According to Wan et al, the compromised immune state of the host leads to fulminant and dry-type EPN, which is fatal.)
    • In 2000, Huang et al modified the staging proposed by Michaeli et al, as follows:1
      • Class 1 - Gas confined to the collecting system
      • Class 2 - Gas confined to the renal parenchyma alone
      • Class 3A - Perinephric extension of gas or abscess
      • Class 3B - Extension of gas beyond the Gerota fascia
      • Class 4 - Bilateral EPN or EPN in solitary kidney
    • Note that the classifications are not comparable.

Staging

See Imaging Studies.



Medical therapy

Prompt hydration, fluid resuscitation, and treatment with systemic antibiotics are the mainstays of management. A monitored-care facility may be needed for patients in shock. Control of diabetes and maintenance of adequate fluid balance should be achieved quickly. Initial antibiotic therapy consists of intravenous ampicillin, gentamicin, and metronidazole and is administered until the culture sensitivities are available. In patients with penicillin allergies, vancomycin is used in place of ampicillin. In patients with renal compromise, doses must be adjusted according to creatinine clearance.

Start imaging studies immediately. Any obstruction found should be relieved with either percutaneous drainage or stent placement. The decision regarding the percutaneous drainage versus a double-J stent probably depends on the patient's condition (see Surgical Therapy). Placement of a stent requires mild sedation or general anesthesia, whereas a percutaneous procedure can be performed with only a local anesthetic. In cases of bilateral emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN) or in cases of EPN in a solitary kidney, percutaneous drainage has been useful. EPN with gas in the collecting system alone or gas and fluid in the perinephric space may respond well to percutaneous drainage.

Patients with EPN are extremely ill and need resuscitative measures in the intensive care unit. Surgical intervention should be performed only after stabilization of the cardiorespiratory status.

Patients with stones and EPN deserve special mention. The presence of a stone often leads to obstruction, which must be urgently relieved with percutaneous drainage or stenting. Definitive treatment for stones should be deferred until later.

Huang et al reported an overall EPN mortality rate of 19%.1 They reported significant success with percutaneous drainage and antibiotics (66%).

Wan et al reported a mortality rate of 40%.3 Furthermore, Wan et al reported a high risk of death in patients with serum creatinine levels greater than 1.4 mg/dL and platelet count of less than 60,000/μL. Huang et al analyzed 46 cases and concluded that class 1 and class 2 EPN could be managed with percutaneous drainage and antibiotics.1 In class 3 and class 4 EPN, the presence of fewer than 2 risk factors (eg, thrombocytopenia, elevated serum creatinine levels, altered sensorium, shock) indicated that percutaneous drainage and antibiotics could also be used. However, in the presence of more than 2 risk factors, nephrectomy yielded better results.

Surgical therapy

Nephrectomy is the treatment of choice in most patients with EPN. 

A retroperitoneal flank incision is the preferred approach to avoid peritoneal contamination. Nephrectomy may be associated with significant bleeding and injury to surrounding structures. The initial procedure should often be conservative with care to drain the abscess. Patients may require intensive-care management. In a series in which nephrectomy was the exclusive treatment after stabilization, the mortality rate was low, suggesting that an aggressive surgical option should be chosen. However, less-invasive options, such as percutaneous drainage, have also been used with success.16

Surgical intervention should be performed only after stabilization of the cardiorespiratory status.

Gas in the renal parenchyma or dry-type EPN should be treated immediately with nephrectomy. Bilateral nephrectomy may be necessary in patients with bilateral EPN. Mortality rates were 15-20% in 2 series in which nephrectomy was the treatment of choice.5, 4

Huang et al analyzed 46 cases and concluded that class 1 and class 2 EPN could be managed with percutaneous drainage and antibiotics.1 In class 3 and class 4 EPN, the presence of fewer than 2 risk factors (eg, thrombocytopenia, elevated serum creatinine levels, altered sensorium, shock) indicated that percutaneous drainage and antibiotics could also be used. However, in the presence of more than 2 risk factors, nephrectomy yielded better results.

In a recent review, Aswathaman et al (2008) reported on 41 patients with EPN; 80% of those patients were successfully treated with antibiotics and percutaneous drainage without requiring nephrectomy.17

Follow-up

For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Kidneys and Urinary System Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education article Urinary Tract Infections.



Untreated cases of emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN) result in death. Medical treatment of EPN may lead to uncontrollable sepsis that requires surgical intervention. Perinephric abscess and renal failure are other complications. Nephrectomy complications include injury to the colon, duodenum, and great vessels. Postoperative wound infection is common because wound healing in these patients is compromised.



Patients with emphysematous pyelonephritis (EPN) should be treated with aggressive medical management and prompt surgical intervention. Conservative treatment, such as percutaneous drainage with antibiotics, should be reserved only for patients with unilateral EPN or bilateral EPN or those with compromised renal function. Early cases of patients with EPN who have gas in the collecting system alone and who are otherwise in stable condition may be treated with antibiotics and drainage. Although nephrectomy offers the best outcome, a trial of conservative treatment with drainage should be offered. However, if access to percutaneous drainage or internal stenting is not available, nephrectomy should be considered after stabilization is achieved.

Management is based on the clinical and laboratory findings. If the patient is stable, conservative treatment with antibiotics and drainage should be tried. If the patient has gas in the renal parenchyma and perinephric tissues along with significant exudate, initial percutaneous drainage should be given a chance. Saving nephrons and the patient's life should be weighed based on the clinical situation, response to treatment, and available facilities.



For additional information, visit Medscape’s Diabetic Microvascular Complications Resource Center and Stone Disease Resource Center.



Media file 1:  Kidneys, ureter, and bladder imaging showing a streaky gas pattern over the entire right kidney in a patient with emphysematous pyelonephritis.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  X-RAY

Media file 2:  Emphysematous pyelonephritis. Kidneys, ureter, and bladder imaging showing gas over the region of the right kidney. White arrows outline the area. The faint outline of a staghorn calculus can be seen in the right kidney.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  X-RAY

Media file 3:  Emphysematous pyelonephritis. Renal sonogram showing hyperechoic shadows suggestive of gas along the lower pole of the kidney.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  X-RAY

Media file 4:  Emphysematous pyelonephritis. CT scan showing gas in the left kidney, with stones and xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  CT

Media file 5:  CT scan showing right renal and perinephric gas in a patient with emphysematous pyelonephritis.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  CT

Media file 6:  CT scan showing gas in both kidneys and the inferior vena cava in a patient with bilateral emphysematous pyelonephritis.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  CT

Media file 7:  Algorithm for the management of emphysematous pyelonephritis.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Graph



  1. Huang JJ, Tseng CC. Emphysematous pyelonephritis: clinicoradiological classification, management, prognosis, and pathogenesis. Arch Intern Med. Mar 27 2000;160(6):797-805. [Medline].
  2. Tang HJ, Li CM, Yen MY, Chen YS, Wann SR, Lin HH, et al. Clinical characteristics of emphysematous pyelonephritis. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. Jun 2001;34(2):125-30. [Medline].
  3. Wan YL, Lo SK, Bullard MJ, Chang PL, Lee TY. Predictors of outcome in emphysematous pyelonephritis. J Urol. Feb 1998;159(2):369-73. [Medline].
  4. Shokeir AA, El-Azab M, Mohsen T, El-Diasty T. Emphysematous pyelonephritis: a 15-year experience with 20 cases. Urology. Mar 1997;49(3):343-6. [Medline].
  5. Pontin AR, Barnes RD, Joffe J, Kahn D. Emphysematous pyelonephritis in diabetic patients. Br J Urol. Jan 1995;75(1):71-4. [Medline].
  6. Kelly HA, MacCullum WG. Pneumaturia. JAMA. 1898;31:375-81.
  7. Cheng YT, Wang HP, Hsieh HH. Emphysematous pyelonephritis in a renal allograft: successful treatment with percutaneous drainage and nephrostomy. Clin Transplant. Oct 2001;15(5):364-7. [Medline].
  8. Schainuck LI, Fouty R, Cutler RE. Emphysematous pyelonephritis. A new case and review of previous observations. Am J Med. Jan 1968;44(1):134-9. [Medline].
  9. Huang JJ, Chen KW, Ruaan MK. Mixed acid fermentation of glucose as a mechanism of emphysematous urinary tract infection. J Urol. Jul 1991;146(1):148-51. [Medline].
  10. Yang WH, Shen NC. Gas-forming infection of the urinary tract: an investigation of fermentation as a mechanism. J Urol. May 1990;143(5):960-4. [Medline].
  11. Wang YC, Wang JM, Chow YC, Chiu AW, Yang S. Pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema as the manifestation of emphysematous pyelonephritis. Int J Urol. Oct 2004;11(10):909-11. [Medline].
  12. Gaither K, Ardite A, Mason TC. Pregnancy complicated by emphysematous pyonephrosis. J Natl Med Assoc. Oct 2005;97(10):1411-3. [Medline].
  13. Langston CS, Pfister RC. Renal emphysema. A case report and review of the literature. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. Dec 1970;110(4):778-86. [Medline].
  14. Michaeli J, Mogle P, Perlberg S, Heiman S, Caine M. Emphysematous pyelonephritis. J Urol. Feb 1984;131(2):203-8. [Medline].
  15. Wan YL, Lee TY, Bullard MJ, Tsai CC. Acute gas-producing bacterial renal infection: correlation between imaging findings and clinical outcome. Radiology. Feb 1996;198(2):433-8. [Medline].
  16. Chen MT, Huang CN, Chou YH, Huang CH, Chiang CP, Liu GC. Percutaneous drainage in the treatment of emphysematous pyelonephritis: 10-year experience. J Urol. May 1997;157(5):1569-73. [Medline].
  17. Aswathaman K, Gopalakrishnan G, Gnanaraj L, Chacko NK, Kekre NS, Devasia A. Emphysematous Pyelonephritis: Outcome of Conservative Management. Urology. Mar 25 2008;[Medline].
  18. Ahlering TE, Boyd SD, Hamilton CL, Bragin SD, Chandrasoma PT, Lieskovsky G, et al. Emphysematous pyelonephritis: a 5-year experience with 13 patients. J Urol. Dec 1985;134(6):1086-8. [Medline].
  19. Ahmad M. Emphysematous pyelonephritis due to Aspergillus fumigatus: a case report. J Nephrol. May-Jun 2004;17(3):446-8. [Medline].
  20. George J, Chakravarthy S, John GT, Jacob CK. Bilateral emphysematous pyelonephritis responding to nonsurgical management. Am J Nephrol. 1995;15(2):172-4. [Medline].
  21. Guvel S, Kilinc F, Kayaselcuk F, Tuncer I, Ozkardes H. Emphysematous pyelonephritis and renal amoebiasis in a patient with diabetes mellitus. Int J Urol. Jul 2003;10(7):404-6. [Medline].
  22. Roy C, Pfleger DD, Tuchmann CM, Lang HH, Saussine CC, Jacqmin D. Emphysematous pyelitis: findings in five patients. Radiology. Mar 2001;218(3):647-50. [Medline].
  23. Wheeler LD. Cystitis emphysematosa: case report. J Urol. Jan 1954;71(1):43-8. [Medline].
  24. Wu VC, Fang CC, Li WY, Hsueh PR, Chu TS. Candida tropicalis-associated bilateral renal papillary necrosis and emphysematous pyelonephritis. Clin Nephrol. Dec 2004;62(6):473-5. [Medline].

Emphysematous Pyelonephritis excerpt

Article Last Updated: May 1, 2008