AUTHOR AND EDITOR INFORMATION

Section 1 of 5  

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction
• Selective Workup
• Summary
• References

INTRODUCTION

Section 2 of 5  

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction
• Selective Workup
• Summary
• References

Medical consultants are generally asked to assess preoperative risk in most patients who are to undergo surgery. The focus of discussion in this article applies to healthy people who are to undergo an elective surgical procedure.

Despite a low risk of perioperative complications, the use of laboratory tests before surgery became ingrained in clinical practice not only across the United States but also across the world in the latter half of the 20th century. At that time, clinicians thought it logical to order tests to detect abnormalities that might lead to increased morbidity or mortality in the perioperative period. Despite its widespread use, however, systematic evaluations of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of routine laboratory testing were often lacking.

In the early and mid 1980s, several investigators published a number of papers demonstrating that routine preoperative testing was not cost-effective and did not benefit the patient. For example, in the mid 1980s, Kaplan and colleagues, in a retrospective review of the charts of 2000 patients who underwent elective surgery, demonstrated that 60% of these patients had laboratory tests ordered for no apparent reason, and that only 0.22% of the abnormal results influenced preoperative management. In another study, Turnbull and colleagues reviewed the charts of 2570 patients undergoing elective surgery, finding that only 104 of 5003 laboratory test results were abnormal and significant, and that only 4 patients would have benefited from "routine" laboratory testing.

To compound the problem, it appears that physicians are poor at evaluating the tests ordered. For example, in a study in which the records of 3782 elective surgery patients were reviewed, only 10 of 160 patients with abnormal test results were treated for such abnormalities. The lack of treatment of identified abnormalities therefore raises the issue of increased legal liability.

In the last 20 years, a progressive challenge to the use of gratuitous routine laboratory testing has developed, especially within the environment of cost-containment and managed care. What, then, should physicians do? A good history and physical examination followed by a review of a patient's chart are undoubtedly the most important routine tests needed.

For example, Narr and colleagues reviewed the charts of 1044 healthy patients who did not undergo any preoperative laboratory testing before their elective surgeries. These patients did not experience any significant perioperative morbidity or mortality. The use of previous laboratory results, performed within 4 months before elective surgery, was supported by a study in which 7549 laboratory results of 1109 patients were reviewed. This study showed that 47% of the laboratory test results duplicated those obtained within 1 year. Of the 3096 normal laboratory test results, only 13 (0.4%) repeated values were abnormal, most of which could have been predicted on the basis of patient history and physical findings.

Furthermore, 5% of healthy people have abnormal test results. This is due to arbitrary cut points that define the range of normal laboratory values to include 2 standard deviations with a 95% confidence interval. For example, the chance that the results of 1 of the 6 tests included in a basic metabolic profile will be abnormal is 26%; hence, the predictive value of the test will be low, especially if the prevalence of the disease is low. For example, based on the Bayes theorem, the positive predictive value of an abnormal hemoglobin test finding is 16.1%, since the prevalence of anemia in healthy individuals is approximately 1%. Accordingly, such abnormal laboratory values, with very low predictive values, may result in further unnecessary workup and delays in surgery.

In a review of studies of routine preoperative testing by Smetana et al (2003), the positive likelihood ratio was modest (>3) for hemoglobin, electrolytes, and renal dysfunction but had a low impact for change on preoperative management. Normal test results did not reduce the likelihood of postoperative complications. In a recent single center study, the incidence of unindicated preoperative screening tests was found to be more than 50%, but it did not add to any benefit to support this persistence of unwarranted testing.

Advancing age, especially older than 70 years, is associated with increased hospital stay and perioperative morbidity and mortality. However, most people in this age group have comorbid conditions, and it remains unclear if complications are secondary to comorbid conditions or age itself.

Contrary to the common belief, obesity does not increase postoperative complications. In a prospective cohort of 6336 patients undergoing general elective surgery, Dindo et al (2003) did not find obesity to be a risk factor for the development of postoperative complications.

For excellent patient education resources, visit eMedicine's Procedures Center. Also, see eMedicine's patient education article Understanding X-rays.

SELECTIVE WORKUP

Section 3 of 5  

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction
• Selective Workup
• Summary
• References

Laboratory studies:

• CBC count
  • Several studies reported a wide range of hemoglobin abnormality among elective surgery patients, based on different study populations. In healthy individuals undergoing elective surgery, the variation is estimated to be less than 1%. A mild hemoglobin abnormality was not associated with an increase of perioperative morbidity or mortality. Recent guidelines recommend preoperative hemoglobin testing if the history is suggestive of underlying anemia or if a significant blood loss is anticipated during the operation.

  • The prevalence of severe leukopenia or leukocytosis is extremely low and rarely leads to a change in patient management. Similarly, thrombocytopenia is found in fewer than 1% of healthy elective surgery patients; thus, routine preoperative WBC or platelet count is not recommended unless the cost of a CBC count is not substantially higher than that of hemoglobin. The cost of falsely pursuing an abnormal WBC or platelet count may not be substantial, although no studies in that regard are available except for platelets.

• Electrolytes
  • Unanticipated electrolyte abnormality (sodium, potassium, bicarbonate, chloride) ranges from 0.2-8.0% among surgery patients. A recent systemic literature review reported that unsuspected electrolyte abnormality is 1.4% among healthy elective surgery patients.

  • Although hypokalemia is considered a minor risk factor for perioperative cardiac complications based on the Goldman risk index, no study showed a relation between hypokalemia and perioperative morbidity and mortality.

  • Postoperative hyponatremia is common in certain types of surgeries, such as transurethral resection of prostate and neurosurgical procedures; however, it is still unclear how baseline electrolyte abnormality may affect physicians' decisions in postoperative management. Accordingly, electrolyte determination is not routinely recommended for elective surgery in healthy individuals.

• Creatinine
  • The prevalence of elevated creatinine levels in asymptomatic patients ranges from 0.2-2.4% and increases with age. Approximately 9.8% of patients aged 46-60 years have elevated creatinine levels.

  • Patients with mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency are usually asymptomatic but have an increased risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Accordingly, testing renal function with serum creatinine level is recommended for all patients older than 40 years, especially if hypotension or use of nephrotoxic medications is anticipated.

• Blood sugar
  • The frequency of abnormal glucose laboratory results in asymptomatic patients ranges from 1.8-5.5%. The frequency increases with age, so that nearly 25% of patients older than 60 years have a fasting blood sugar level above 120 mg/dL.

  • Only in certain operations, such as vascular surgery and coronary artery bypass grafting, was diabetes associated with higher perioperative risks; hence, routine blood sugar determination is not recommended unless the patient has high risk for diabetes (eg, obesity, steroids, strong family history) or will be undergoing vascular or bypass surgery.

• Liver enzymes
  • The frequency of a hepatic aminotransferase enzyme (aspartate aminotransferase [AST], alanine aminotransferase [ALT]) abnormality is estimated to be approximately 0.3%. Although Powell-Jackson and colleagues showed that severe liver test abnormalities may lead to an increase in surgical morbidity and mortality risk, no evidence confirms that mild elevation in liver enzymes is associated with such an increased risk.

  • Because most patients with severe aminotransferase enzyme elevation are likely to be symptomatic, and jaundice may be detected by physical examination, routine preoperative screening is not recommended for healthy individuals.

• Hemostasis
  • In the absence of a history of bleeding diathesis in elective surgery patients, abnormal bleeding time, prothrombin time (PT), and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) results are estimated to be less than 1%.

  • Suchman and colleagues showed that in low-risk patients, per history and physical examination, aPTT does not predict the risk of perioperative bleeding. Similarly, the bleeding time has no predictive value on the incidence of perioperative bleeding in healthy elective surgery patients. Accordingly, PT, aPTT, and bleeding time are not recommended for routine screening.

• Urinalysis
  • The primary rationale for ordering urinalysis (UA) preoperatively is to detect either asymptomatic renal disease or underlying urinary tract infection (UTI). To detect unsuspected renal insufficiency, serum creatinine measurement is recommended for any elective surgery patient older than 40 years, although it is unclear if any correlation exists between asymptomatic UTI and surgical wound infection.

  • One study that included 200 patients undergoing orthopedic procedures showed that physicians addressed only 5 of 27 abnormal urine test results. A further economic analysis showed that in order to prevent a single wound infection, approximately $1.5 million must be spent on UA; therefore, UA is not recommended routinely for asymptomatic patients.

• Fecal occult blood
  • The prevalence of positive fecal occult blood findings among healthy individuals undergoing elective surgery is unknown. In addition, the benefits of routine screening are unclear.

  • A decision-analysis study showed no benefit of routine screening; therefore, insufficient evidence exists to support routine screening for fecal occult blood.

Imaging studies:

• ECG
  • The prevalence of abnormal ECG findings among healthy elective surgery patients ranges from 14-53% and increases with age in a continuous fashion.

  • The rationale for obtaining ECG preoperatively is to identify high-risk patients with prior myocardial infarction or arrhythmia. Detecting a silent myocardial infarction is of main clinical benefit because numerous investigators showed an association between preoperative myocardial infarction and surgical mortality. One study showed that 25% of 708 myocardial infarctions in the Framingham study were detected by ECG. In addition, any rhythm other than sinus, including frequent premature ventricular contraction, is associated with an increase in surgical risk. Accordingly, routine ECG is recommended for all patients older than 40 years undergoing elective surgery.

  • In a recent retrospective study of 23,036 patients who underwent 28,457 surgical procedures, multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between ECG abnormalities and cardiovascular death. A total of 199 in-hospital cardiovascular deaths (0.7%) occurred. A higher incidence of cardiovascular death was observed in patients with an abnormal ECG than in those with normal ECG results (1.8% vs 0.3%; adjusted odds ratio 4.5, 95% confidence interval 3.3-6.0). However, there was no significant difference (0.5%) in the incidence of cardiovascular death in patients, with or without ECG abnormality, who underwent low-risk or low- to intermediate-risk surgery.

  • Noordzij et al (2006) concluded that preoperative ECG provides prognostic information in addition to clinical characteristics and the type of surgery. However, the usefulness of routine ECG testing in lower risk surgery is questionable.

• Chest radiograph
  • The frequency of abnormal chest radiograph (CXR) findings increases with age. One study showed that 0.3% of patients younger than 60 years had unsuspected abnormal CXR results or clinical findings suggestive of underlying cardiac or pulmonary disease compared to 22% of patients older than 60 years.

  • In addition, Goldman reported that CXR in patients with congestive heart failure does not independently add to the risk of perioperative mortality and morbidity. A meta-analysis of 21 studies that included 14,390 routine CXR showed that only 140 of 1444 abnormal results were not clinically expected and that only 14 affected physicians' decisions in managing their patients. Accordingly, routine CXR is recommended only for patients older than 60 years unless underlying heart or lung disease is a possibility.

SUMMARY

Section 4 of 5  

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction
• Selective Workup
• Summary
• References

Routine preoperative screening of healthy people undergoing elective surgery is not recommended. Instead, a selective strategy, as outlined above, is safe and cost-effective as long as a complete history and physical examination are obtained. Based on the available evidence, the authors recommend the following preoperative tests:

1. Hemoglobin level for major surgery with significant expected blood loss or CBC count if the cost is not substantially increased

2. Serum creatinine level for people older than 40 years

3. ECG in patients older than 40 years

4. CXR in patients older than 60 years

No laboratory test must be repeated if results were normal within 4 months of the surgery and no change in the patient's clinical status occurred. Finally, this strategy applies only to healthy, asymptomatic patients undergoing elective surgery. Patients with suspected pulmonary or cardiac disease or those undergoing urgent operation require additional evaluation that is beyond the scope of this article.

REFERENCES

Section 5 of 5

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction
• Selective Workup
• Summary
• References

• Archer C, Levy AR, McGregor M. Value of routine preoperative chest x-rays: a meta-analysis. ALYSIS. Nov 1993;40(11):1022-7. [Medline].
• Bushick JB, Eisenberg JM, Kinman J. Pursuit of abnormal coagulation screening tests generates modest hidden preoperative costs. J Gen Intern Med. Nov-Dec 1989;4(6):493-7. [Medline].
• Carson JL, Poses RM, Spence RK. Severity of anaemia and operative mortality and morbidity. Lancet. Apr 2 1988;1(8588):727-9. [Medline].
• Channing Rodgers R, Levin J. A critical appraisal of the bleeding time. Seminar in Thrombosis and Homeostasis. 1990;15:1-20.
• Chung HM, Kluge R, Schrier RW. Postoperative hyponatremia. A prospective study. Arch Intern Med. Feb 1986;146(2):333-6. [Medline].
• Dawson-Saunders B, Trapp R. Evaluating diagnostic procedures. Basic and Clinical Biostatistics. 1994;240-1.
• Dindo D, Muller MK, Weber M. Obesity in general elective surgery. Lancet. Jun 14 2003;361(9374):2032-5.
• Goldberger AL, O'Konski M. Utility of the routine electrocardiogram before surgery and on general hospital admission. Critical review and new guidelines. Ann Intern Med. Oct 1986;105(4):552-7. [Medline].
• Goldman L, Caldera DL, Nussbaum SR. Multifactorial index of cardiac risk in noncardiac surgical procedures. New England Journal of Medicine. Oct 20 1977;297(16):845-50. [Medline].
• Hjortrup A, Sorensen C, Dyremose E. Influence of diabetes mellitus on operative risk. Br J Surg. Oct 1985;72(10):783-5. [Medline].
• Hou SH, Bushinsky DA, Wish JB. Hospital-acquired renal insufficiency: a prospective study. Am J Med. Feb 1983;74(2):243-8. [Medline].
• Johnson H Jr, Knee-Ioli S, Butler TA. Are routine preoperative laboratory screening tests necessary to evaluate ambulatory surgical patients?. Surgery. Oct 1988;104(4):639-45. [Medline].
• Kannel WB, Abbott RD. Incidence and prognosis of unrecognized myocardial infarction. An update on the Framingham study. N Engl J Med. Nov 1 1984;311(18):1144-7. [Medline].
• Kaplan EB, Sheiner LB, Boeckmann AJ. The usefulness of preoperative laboratory screening. JAMA. Jun 28 1985;253(24):3576-81. [Medline].
• Lawrence VA, Kroenke K. The unproven utility of preoperative urinalysis. Clinical use. Arch Intern Med. Jun 1988;148(6):1370-3. [Medline].
• Lawrence VA, Gafni A, Gross M. The unproven utility of the preoperative urinalysis: economic evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42(12):1185-92. [Medline].
• Macpherson DS, Snow R, Lofgren RP. Preoperative screening: value of previous tests [see comments]. Ann Intern Med. Dec 15 1990;113(12):969-73. [Medline].
• Macpherson DS. Preoperative laboratory testing: should any tests be "routine" before surgery?. Med Clin North Am. Mar 1993;77(2):289-308. [Medline].
• Mancuso CA. Impact of new guidelines on physicians' ordering of preoperative tests. J Gen Intern Med. Mar 1999;14(3):166-72. [Medline].
• Mantha S, Roizen MF, Madduri J. Usefulness of routine preoperative testing: a prospective single-observer study. J Clin Anesth. Feb 2005;17(1):51-7.
• Munro J, Booth A, Nicholl J. Routine preoperative testing: a systematic review of the evidence. Health Technol Assess. 1997;1(12):i-iv; 1-62. [Medline].
• Nardella A, Pechet L, Snyder LM. Continuous improvement, quality control, and cost containment in clinical laboratory testing. Effects of establishing and implementing guidelines for preoperative tests. Arch Pathol Lab Med. Jun 1995;119(6):518-22. [Medline].
• Narr BJ, Hansen TR, Warner MA. Preoperative laboratory screening in healthy Mayo patients: cost- effective elimination of tests and unchanged outcomes. Mayo Clin Proc. Feb 1991;66(2):155-9. [Medline].
• Narr BJ, Warner ME, Schroeder DR. Outcomes of patients with no laboratory assessment before anesthesia and a surgical procedure. Mayo Clin Proc. Jun 1997;72(6):505-9. [Medline].
• Noordzij PG, Boersma E, Bax JJ. Prognostic value of routine preoperative electrocardiography in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Am J Cardiol. Apr 1 2006;97(7):1103-6.
• Polanczyk CA, Marcantonio E, Goldman L. Impact of age on perioperative complications and length of stay in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Ann Intern Med. Apr 17 2001;134(8):637-43.
• Powell-Jackson P, Greenway B, Williams R. Adverse effects of exploratory laparotomy in patients with unsuspected liver disease. Br J Surg. Aug 1982;69(8):449-51. [Medline].
• Rao TL, Jacobs KH, El-Etr AA. Reinfarction following anesthesia in patients with myocardial infarction. Anesthesiology. Dec 1983;59(6):499-505. [Medline].
• Robbins JA, Mushlin AI. Preoperative evaluation of the healthy patient. Med Clin North Am. Nov 1979;63(6):1145-56. [Medline].
• Rohrer MJ, Michelotti MC, Nahrwold DL. A prospective evaluation of the efficacy of preoperative coagulation testing. Ann Surg. Nov 1988;208(5):554-7. [Medline].
• Roizen MF. The compelling rationale for less preoperative testing [editorial]. Can J Anaesth. May 1988;35(3 ( Pt 1)):214-8. [Medline].
• Rucker L, Frye EB, Staten MA. Usefulness of screening chest roentgenograms in preoperative patients. JAMA. Dec 16 1983;250(23):3209-11. [Medline].
• Sanders DP, McKinney FW, Harris WH. Clinical evaluation and cost effectiveness of preoperative laboratory assessment on patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 1989;12(11):1449-53. [Medline].
• Schroeder SA, Myers LP, McPhee SJ. The failure of physician education as a cost containment strategy. Report of a prospective controlled trial at a university hospital. JAMA. Jul 13 1984;252(2):225-30. [Medline].
• Smetana GW, Macpherson DS. The case against routine preoperative laboratory testing. Med Clin North Am. Jan 2003;87(1):7-40.
• Sonnenberg A, Townsend WF. Preoperative testing for fecal occult blood: a questionable practice. Am J Gastroenterol. Oct 1992;87(10):1410-7. [Medline].
• Suchman AL, Mushlin AI. How well does the activated partial thromboplastin time predict postoperative hemorrhage?. JAMA. Aug 8 1986;256(6):750-3. [Medline].
• Tornebrandt K, Fletcher R. Pre-operative chest x-rays in elderly patients. Anaesthesia. Sep 1982;37(9):901-2. [Medline].
• Turnbull JM, Buck C. The value of preoperative screening investigations in otherwise healthy individuals. Arch Intern Med. Jun 1987;147(6):1101-5. [Medline].
• Velanovich V. The value of routine preoperative laboratory testing in predicting postoperative complications: a multivariate analysis. Surgery. Mar 1991;109(3 Pt 1):236-43. [Medline].
• Williams SV, Eisenberg JM. A controlled trial to decrease the unnecessary use of diagnostic tests. J Gen Intern Med. Jan-Feb 1986;1(1):8-13. [Medline].

Article Last Updated: Mar 15, 2007