You are in: eMedicine Specialties > Medicine, Ob/Gyn, Psychiatry, and Surgery > Cardiology
|
Unstable Angina Last Updated: August 24, 2005 |
|
| Synonyms and related keywords: UA, acute coronary syndrome, ACS, preinfarction angina, intermediate coronary syndrome, accelerated angina, crescendo angina, myocardial infarction, MI, chest pain, heart attack, coronary disease, hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, HOCM, microvascular disease, atherosclerotic plaque, atherosclerosis, cholesterol, new-onset angina, accelerating angina, rest angina, early postinfarct angina, early postrevascularization angina, non–Q-wave myocardial infarction, non–Q-wave MI, NQMI, non-STEMI, NSTEMI
|
|   |
AUTHOR INFORMATION
| Section 1 of 11  |
|
| Author: Walter A Tan, MD, MS, Assistant Professor of Medicine (Cardiology) and Radiology, Director of Vascular Medicine Program, Departments of Medicine and Radiology, Division of Cardiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Coauthor(s): David J Moliterno, MD, Chief, Cardiovascular Medicine, Professor and Vice-Chairman, Department of Medicine, University of Kentucky; Steven J Filby, MD, Fellow in Cardiovascular Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill |
| Walter A Tan, MD, MS, is a member of the following medical societies:
American Association for the Advancement of Science,
American College of Cardiology,
American College of Physicians,
American Heart Association, and
American Stroke Association |
| Editor(s): Justin D Pearlman, MD, ME, PhD, MA, Director of Dartmouth Advanced Imaging Center, Professor of Medicine, Professor of Radiology, Adjunct Professor, Thayer Bioengineering and Computer Science, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center; Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine;
Marschall S Runge, MD, PhD, Marion Covington Distinguished Professor of Medicine, Vice Dean for Clinical Affairs, School of Medicine, Chairman, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill;
Amer Suleman, MD, Consultant in Electrophysiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Medical City Dallas Hospital;
and Michael E Zevitz, MD, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Finch University of the Health Sciences, The Chicago Medical School; Consulting Staff, Private Practice |
Disclosure
|   |
INTRODUCTION
| Section 2 of 11  |
|
Background: The traditional term, unstable angina, was first used 3 decades ago and was meant to signify the intermediate state between myocardial infarction (MI) and the more chronic state of stable angina. The old term, preinfarction angina, conveys the clinical intent of intervening to attenuate the risk of MI or death. Patients with this condition have also been categorized according to their presentation, diagnostic test results, or course over time; these categories include new-onset angina, accelerating angina, rest angina, early postinfarct angina, and early postrevascularization angina.
For the pragmatic purposes of this article, the term unstable angina includes non–Q-wave MI (NQMI) because this cannot be confirmed or excluded during the initial contact with the patient. Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) cover an even wider spectrum, and by some definitions include Q-wave or transmural MI. Pathophysiology: Chest pain is a nonspecific symptom that can have cardiac or noncardiac causes (see Differentials). The term angina is typically reserved for pain syndromes arising from presumed myocardial ischemia.
Unstable angina belongs to the continuum of the ACS because of the shared pathophysiology, evaluation, and treatments with NQMI and Q-wave MI. Although the etiology and definition of unstable angina can be broad, an interplay between disrupted atherosclerotic plaque and overlaid thrombi is present in many cases of unstable angina, with consequent hemodynamic deficit or microembolization. This is distinct from stable angina, in which the typical underlying cause is a fixed coronary stenosis with compromised blood flow and slow, progressive plaque growth that allows for the occasional development of collateral flow.
Other causes of angina, such as hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) or microvascular disease (syndrome X), cause ischemia by means of different mechanisms and are considered separate entities.
Factors involved in the pathophysiology of unstable angina include supply-demand mismatch, plaque disruption, thrombosis, vasoconstriction, and cyclical flow.
Supply-demand mismatch
The myocardial ischemia of unstable angina, like all tissue ischemia, results from excessive demand or inadequate supply of oxygen, glucose, and free fatty acids.
Secondary disorders cause ischemia by increasing myocardial oxygen demand (eg, fever, thyrotoxicosis, cocaine) or by decreasing oxygen supply (eg, hypoxemia, anemia). Such causes must be investigated because most of these conditions are reversible. For instance, anemia from chronic GI bleeding (eg, duodenal ulcers, arteriovenous malformations, angiodysplasia, diverticulosis, Paget disease) is not uncommon in elderly patients. This can be coexistent with coronary artery disease (CAD). However, patients may not benefit or may be harmed by treatments such as anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs.
Excess demand from increased myocardial workload (heart rate–systolic pressure product) or wall stress is responsible for nearly all cases of stable angina and perhaps one third of all episodes of unstable angina.
Plaque disruption
Accumulation of lipid-laden macrophages and smooth muscle cells, so-called foam cells, occurs within atherosclerotic plaques. The oxidized low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in foam cells is cytotoxic, procoagulant, and chemotactic. As the atherosclerotic plaque grows, production of macrophage proteases and neutrophil elastases within the plaque can cause thinning of the fibromuscular cap that covers the lipid core. Increasing plaque instability coupled with blood-flow shear and circumferential wall stress lead to plaque fissuring or rupture, especially at the junction of the cap and the vessel wall (see Image 1).
The degree and consequence of plaque disruption covers a wide spectrum. Minor fissuring is typically nonocclusive and hence clinically silent, and repeat occult episodes of plaque ulceration and healing with a gradual growth of plaque volume have been histologically documented. Moderate-to-large plaque disruptions commonly result in unstable angina or acute infarction.
Thrombosis
Exposure of subendothelial components provokes platelet adhesion and activation. Platelets then aggregate in response to exposed vessel wall collagen or local aggregates (eg, thromboxane, adenosine diphosphate). Platelets also release substances that promote vasoconstriction and production of thrombin. In a reciprocating fashion, thrombin is a potent agonist for further platelet activation, and it stabilizes thrombi by converting fibrinogen to fibrin.
The nonocclusive thrombus of unstable angina can become transiently or persistently occlusive. Depending on the duration of occlusion, the presence of collateral vessels, and the area of myocardium perfused, recurrent unstable angina, NQMI, or Q-wave infarction can result.
Vasoconstriction and cyclic flow variation
Most patients with ACS have recurrent transient reduction in coronary blood supply secondary to vasoconstriction and thrombus formation at the site of atherosclerotic plaque rupture. These events occur because of episodic platelet aggregation and complex interactions among the vascular wall, leukocytes, platelets, and atherogenic lipoproteins. Frequency:
- In the US: The incidence of unstable angina is increasing, and nearly 1 million hospitalized patients each year have a primary diagnosis of unstable angina.
A similar number of unstable angina episodes likely occur outside the hospital and are unrecognized or managed in the outpatient setting. With heightened public awareness, improved survival after MI, and aging of the population, this number should continue to rise despite primary and secondary prevention measures.
Reasonably accurate statistical estimates for unstable angina can be obtained from the Global Unstable Angina Registry and Treatment Evaluation (GUARANTEE) study. This study involved 3000 consecutive hospital admissions for unstable angina in 35 hospitals in 6 geographic regions (Northeast, Mideast, Midwest, Southeast, Southwest, Northwest) from September 1995 to August 1996. The demographic characteristics of patients in the GUARANTEE registry with unstable angina are summarized as follows:
- Mean age - 62 years
- Patients older than 65 years - 44%
- Patient histories:
- Hypertension - 60%
- Diabetes mellitus - 26%
- Current smoker - 25%
- Hypercholesterolemia - 43%
- Family history of CAD - 42%
- Previous stroke - 9%
- Previous MI - 36%
- Previous angina - 66%
- Congestive heart failure (CHF) - 14%
- Previous coronary angioplasty - 23%
- Previous coronary bypass surgery - 25%
- Internationally: The best demographic data available are from the Organization to Assess Strategies for Ischemic Syndromes (OASIS-2) registry. It included 7987 patients with acute myocardial ischemia without ST elevation from 95 hospitals across 6 countries (Australia, Brazil, Canada, Hungary, Poland, United States). Table 1 lists the patients' characteristics.
Table 1. Demographic Characteristics of Patients in the International OASIS-2 Registry
| Characteristics | Australia | Brazil | Canada | Hungary | Poland | United States |
| General | Patients | 1899 | 1478 | 1626 | 931 | 1135 | 918 |
| Mean age (y) | 65 | 62 | 66 | 65 | 63 | 66 |
| Women (%) | 37 | 42 | 37 | 45 | 40 | 37 |
| Clinical |
NQMI presentation (%) | 7 | 7 | 14 | 22 | 17 | 16 |
| Abnormal ECG (%) | 74 | 91 | 82 | 95 | 97 | 87 |
| Select treatments |
Beta-blocker (%) | 67 | 53 | 73 | 67 | 59 | 57 |
| Calcium blocker (%) | 59 | 51 | 53 | 52 | 43 | 59 |
| Invasive procedures (index hospitalization) |
Cardiac catheterization (%) | 24 | 69 | 43 | 20 | 7 | 58 |
| Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) (%) | 7 | 19 | 16 | 5 | 0.4 | 24 |
| Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) (%) | 4 | 20 | 10 | 7 | 0.4 | 17 |
Because unstable angina is intimately linked to the incidence of coronary events, an approximation of international trends might be found in the Monitoring Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Diseases (MONICA) Registry sponsored by the World Health Organization (WHO). This large project monitored more than 7 million people aged 35-64 years from 30 populations in 21 countries from the mid-1980s. The highest average rates of heart disease were found in Glasgow and Belfast, United Kingdom; North Karelia and Kuopio, Finland; Newcastle, Australia; and Warsaw, Poland. The lowest average MI rates, and presumably unstable angina rates, were observed in Beijing, China; Toulouse, France; Catalonia, Spain; Vaud-Fribourg, Switzerland; and Brianza, Italy.
Mortality/Morbidity: The risk of death, MI, and complications is variable because of the broad clinical spectrum that is covered by the term unstable angina. The average risk for these patients is discussed here. More specific risk stratification is detailed in Treatment. The aggressiveness of the therapeutic approach should be commensurate to the individualized estimated risk.
- Older studies show that the incidence of death in the early weeks after hospitalization is approximately 4%, and the incidence of MI is approximately 10%.
- Thirty-day event rates are the current standard for cross-comparing studies. The aggregate data for the more than 40,000 patients with ACS in studies employing contemporary treatments (albeit in varying degrees) indicate improving outcomes (see Table 2). The 30-day death and MI rates are currently around 3.5% and 8.5%, respectively, in spite of increased disease complexity and an aging cohort.
Table 2. Thirty-Day Clinical Outcome in Patients With ACS in Clinical Trials From 1994-2000
| Study | Year | Number of Patients | Death (%) | MI (%) | Major Bleed (%) |
| TIMI-3 | 1994 | 1473 | 2.5 | 9.0 | 0.3 |
| GUSTO-IIb | 1997 | 8011 | 3.8 | 6.0 | 1.0 |
| ESSENCE | 1997 | 3171 | 3.3 | 4.5 | 1.1 |
| PARAGON-A | 1998 | 2282 | 3.2 | 10.3 | 4.0 |
| PRISM | 1998 | 3232 | 3.0 | 4.2 | 0.4 |
| PRISM-PLUS | 1998 | 1915 | 4.4 | 8.1 | 1.1 |
| PURSUIT | 1998 | 10,948 | 3.6 | 12.9 | 2.1 |
| TIMI-11B | 1999 | 3910 | 3.9 | 6.0 | 1.3 |
| PARAGON-B | 2000 | 5225 | 3.1 | 9.3 | 1.1 |
| Pooled | 40,167 | 3.5 | 8.5 | 1.5 |
- For expanded study names, see Acronyms and abbreviations.
- The Recursos Empleados en el Sindrome Coronario Agudo y Tiempos de Espera (RESCATE) investigators from Spain report a 1.8% mortality rate and a 5.1% MI rate at 28 days (n = 791, consecutive series between 1992 and 1994, early revascularization rate about 6%). By comparison with the therapeutically aggressive and predominantly North American studies listed in Table 1, these adverse event rates seem lower, probably because of the healthier case-mix (patients with unstable angina without previous MI), which illustrates the difficulties of direct outcome comparisons between institutions and countries and across different trials.
- The outcome in patients with abnormal electrocardiographic findings, and in particular ST-segment depression, approximates that of patients with acute MI. Other predictors of worse long-term outcome in unstable angina include advanced age, underlying left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and more widespread extent of CAD.
Race: Disparities in outcomes and the prevalence of risk factors among different ethnic groups have been widely reported. For instance, as a group, blacks exhibit a higher prevalence of atherosclerotic risk factors (eg, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking), greater left ventricular mass, and decreased peripheral vasodilatory response. Relative to whites, MI more frequently results in death in blacks at young ages.
- Fewer myocardial events but more cerebral complications have been observed in black patients with unstable angina in randomized clinical trials of heparin versus hirudin (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and TPA for Occluded Coronary Arteries [GUSTO II]) or eptifibatide versus placebo (Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa in Unstable angina: Receptor Suppression Using Integrilin Therapy [PURSUIT]). This is postulated to be due to the enhanced fibrinolytic activity and higher prevalence of hypertension in this population.
- Differences also exist in the delivery and response to medical care. Whites have a higher rate of catheterization, angioplasty, and bypass surgery than other racial groups. A recent analysis of Medicare beneficiaries also showed underuse of catheterization, particularly for managed-care enrollees as opposed to fee-for-service beneficiaries. The coronary angiography rates even for those with American College of Cardiology–American Heart Association (ACC-AHA) class I indications (angiography deemed useful or effective) in this post-MI study were 46% versus 37%, respectively (P < .001).
- Studies have shown equivalent short-term (30-day) mortality rates from unstable angina (including NQMI) for blacks, but over the long term, persistent worse outcomes have been demonstrated.
Sex: Women with unstable angina are older and have a higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, CHF, and family history of CAD than men. Men tend to have a higher previous incidence of MI and revascularization, a higher proportion of positive cardiac enzymes on admission, and higher rates of catheterization and revascularization. However, outcome is related more to the severity of the illness than to sex.
Age: The mean age of presentation with unstable angina is 62 years, with an age range of 23-100 years. To put this in perspective, the mean age is 60 years for patients in clinical trials for MI, about 67 years for carotid artery stenosis, and 63 years for CHF. On average, women with unstable angina are 5 years older than men on presentation, with approximately half of women older than 65 years, as opposed to only about a third of men. Blacks tend to present at a slightly younger age (mean ± standard deviation, 59 ± 13 y) than people of other races.
|   |
CLINICAL
| Section 3 of 11  |
|
History: Obtain a focused history regarding the circumstances surrounding patients' symptoms, coronary risk factors, and history and risk of bleeding. - Initially obtain history to determine whether any evidence of angina is present, and then aim to identify whether it is stable or unstable.
- Unstable angina differs from stable angina in that the discomfort is usually more intense and easily provoked, and ST-segment depression or elevation on ECG may occur. Otherwise, the manifestations of unstable angina are similar to those of other conditions of myocardial ischemia such as chronic stable angina and MI.
- Angina can take many forms, and inquiry should be directed at eliciting not only chest pain but also any discomfort as well as its frequency, location, radiation pattern, and precipitating and alleviating factors. Ischemic pain can manifest as heaviness, tightness, aching, fullness, or burning of the chest, epigastrium, and/or arm or forearm (usually the left). These sensations less typically involve the lower jaw, neck, or shoulder. Important associated symptoms may be dyspnea, generalized fatigue, diaphoresis, nausea and vomiting, flu-like symptoms, and less commonly, lightheadedness or abdominal pain.
- Elderly and female patients are more likely to present with atypical signs and symptoms.
- The first tier of diagnosis is to determine the probability that a patient's symptoms are due to CAD. The Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) Clinical Practice Guideline for unstable angina recommends stratification of patients into high (0.85-0.99), medium (0.15-0.84), and low (0.01-0.14) likelihood for CAD.
- Risk assessment
- Clinical tip: Simply put, the 2 fundamental questions in the approach to the patient with possible angina are the following: (1) Is this CAD? (That is, what is the diagnosis, or what does the patient have?) (2) How dangerous is this? (That is, what is the prognosis, or what is the risk of something bad happening next?) Therefore, a brief history and physical examination, resting 12-lead ECG, and blood draw for evaluation of cardiac enzymes should be accomplished expeditiously.
- Estimation of likelihood of significant CAD is a complex multivariable problem that cannot be fully specified in a list such as this. The following is meant to illustrate major relationships rather than offer rigid algorithms. The likelihood of significant CAD in patients presenting with chest pain syndrome is as follows:
- High likelihood (85-99%) includes any of the following features:
- History of prior MI or sudden death or other known history of CAD
- Definite angina - Males aged 60 years or older or females aged 70 years or older
- Transient hemodynamic or ECG changes during pain
- Variant angina (pain with reversible ST-segment elevation)
- ST-segment elevation or depression 1 mm or more
- Marked symmetrical T wave inversion in multiple precordial leads
- Intermediate likelihood (15-84%) includes absence of high likelihood features and any of the following:
- Definite angina - Males younger than 60 years or females younger than 70 years
- Probable angina - Males aged 60 years or older or females aged 70 years or older
- Chest pain probably not angina in patients with diabetes mellitus
- Chest pain probably not angina; presence of 2 or 3 risk factors other than diabetes mellitus (CAD risk factors include diabetes mellitus, smoking, hypertension, and elevated cholesterol)
- Extracardiac vascular disease
- ST depression 0.05 to 1 mm
- T wave inversion 1 mm or greater in leads with dominant R waves
- Low likelihood (1-14%) includes absence of high or intermediate likelihood features and any of the following:
- Chest pain classified as probably not angina
- One risk factor other than diabetes mellitus (CAD risk factors include diabetes mellitus, smoking, hypertension, and elevated cholesterol)
- T-wave flattening or inversion less than 1 mm in leads with dominant R waves
- Normal ECG findings
- Risk stratification
- After the likelihood for CAD is determined to be significant, the next step is to stratify the patient's risk for an event. The estimation of likelihood of significant CAD is critical for identifying high risk patients who may benefit from more aggressive treatment strategy (eg, cardiac catheterization).
- The TIMI Risk Score for unstable angina/non–ST elevation MI is currently the best-validated prognostic instrument that is simple enough to use in an emergency department setting. The gradient of death, MI, or severe recurrent ischemia is somewhat proportionate to the TIMI Risk Score (see Image 2).
- The presence of any of the following 7 variables constitutes 1 point, with the sum constituting the patient risk score on a scale of 0-7:
- Aged 65 years or older
- Use of aspirin in the last 7 days
- Known coronary stenosis of 50% or greater
- Elevated serum cardiac markers
- At least 3 risk factors for CAD (including diabetes mellitus, active smoker, family history of CAD, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia)
- Severe anginal symptoms (eg, 2 or more anginal events in the last 24 h)
- ST deviation on ECG
- Of note, studies have shown that ongoing CHF, presence/history of poor left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), hemodynamic instability, recurrent angina despite intensive anti-ischemic therapy, new or worsening mitral regurgitation, or sustained ventricular tachycardia are significant prognosticators for poor outcome. However, these factors were not evaluated in the TIMI Risk Score model and should be taken into consideration when the level of care is decided.
- Factors that were specifically examined but were not found to have prognostic value in the multivariate model include prior MI, previous percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or CABG, or history of CHF.
- The inflection point for death or MI starts at a TIMI Risk Score of 3. Therefore, patients with a score of 3-7 should be considered for use of intravenous (IV) glycoprotein IIb/IIIa agents, heparin (low molecular weight or unfractionated), and early cardiac catheterization (see Treatment).
- Classification of unstable angina
- The Canadian Cardiovascular Society Grading System for effort-related angina is a simple and practical classification that is often used to describe symptom severity. It is as follows:
- Grade I: Angina with strenuous, rapid, or prolonged exertion. (Ordinary physical activity such as climbing stairs does not provoke angina.)
- Grade II: Slight limitation of ordinary activity. (Angina occurs with postprandial, uphill, or rapid walking; when walking more than 2 blocks of level ground or climbing more than one flight of stairs; during emotional stress; or in the early hours after awakening.)
- Grade III: Marked limitation of ordinary activity. (Angina occurs with walking 1-2 blocks or climbing a flight of stairs at a normal pace.)
- Grade IV: Inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. (Rest pain occurs.)
- Clinical tip: Although the aforementioned classifications provide a solid framework for studying this condition, clarity in documentation and peer-to-peer communication may be improved when the presentation and key data are stated explicitly. For example, "50-year-old man, insulin-requiring diabetes, with 4 weeks of new left-arm ache with mild exertion; last night awakened with shortness of breath."
Physical: The physical examination is usually not as sensitive or specific for unstable angina as history or diagnostic tests. An unremarkable physical examination is not uncommon. Perform a quick assessment of patients' vital signs, and perform a cardiac examination. Specific diagnoses that must be explicitly considered are aortic dissection, leaking or ruptured thoracic aneurysm, pericarditis with tamponade, pulmonary embolism, and pneumothorax. Ideally, a 12-lead ECG should be performed within 10 minutes of presentation. - Increased autonomic activity may manifest as diaphoresis or tachycardia, and bradycardia may result from vagal stimulation from inferior wall myocardial ischemia.
- A large area of myocardial jeopardy may manifest as signs of transient myocardial dysfunction and typically signifies a higher-risk situation.
- Systolic blood pressure (BP) less than 110 mm Hg or overt hypotension
- Elevated jugular venous pressure
- Reverse splitting of the second heart sound
- Presence of a third or fourth heart sound
- New or worsening apical systolic murmur due to papillary muscle dysfunction
- Findings indicative of peripheral arterial occlusive disease or prior stroke increases the likelihood of associated CAD.
- Supraclavicular or femoral bruits
- Diminished peripheral pulses or BP
- Clinical tip: Any sign of CHF, including isolated tachycardia, particularly in vulnerable populations (eg, very elderly patients), should trigger expeditious work-up, treatment, or consultation with a cardiologist. Such patients may be at a turning point for adverse events.
Causes: Many different conditions can provoke myocardial ischemia (Braunwald class A), including the following: - Tachyarrhythmias (eg, atrial fibrillation or flutter)
- Supravalvular aortic stenosis
- Obstructive cardiomyopathy
|   |
DIFFERENTIALS
| Section 4 of 11  |
|
Biliary Disease Esophageal Spasm Herpes Zoster Mallory-Weiss Tear Mediastinitis Peptic Ulcer Disease Pneumothorax Pulmonary Embolism
Other Problems to be Considered:
Cardiac
Aortic dissection
Aortic stenosis
Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
Pericarditis
Right ventricular strain due to severe pulmonary hypertension
Microvascular disease (syndrome X)
Rare conditions (eg, spontaneous coronary artery dissection, anomalous left coronary artery passing between the aorta and pulmonary artery, embolization into coronary arteries)
Vascular
Aortic dissection
Pulmonary embolism
Pulmonary hypertension
Pulmonary
Pleuritis or pneumonia
Pneumothorax
Tracheobronchitis
Tumor
Mediastinitis or mediastinal emphysema
Gastrointestinal
Peptic ulcer disease
Esophageal reflux
Esophageal spasm
Mallory-Weiss tear
Biliary disease
Pancreatitis
Musculoskeletal
Cervical disk disease
Arthritis of the shoulder or spine
Costochondritis
Intercostal muscle cramps
Interscalene or hyperabduction syndromes
Subacromial bursitis
Other
Herpes zoster
Disorders of the breast
Tumors of the chest wall
Anxiety/hyperventilation |
|
|   |
WORKUP
| Section 5 of 11  |
|
Lab Studies:
- The following laboratory studies are recommended in the evaluation of the patient with unstable angina: (1) serial cardiac markers, (2) hemogloblin, (3) serum chemistry, (4) lipid panel within 24 hours of presentation. A number of cardiac biomarker assays are currently available for the diagnosis of myocardial cell necrosis. Some of these, especially the troponin assays, are powerful prognostic tools as well and serve as important guides to the aggressiveness of approach.
- Cardiac enzymes
- The current standard of care includes drawing blood for total creatine kinase (CK) and its MB isoenzyme (CK-MB) every 6-8 hours during the first 24 hours. Also, determine cardiac-specific troponin (T or I) levels at least twice, 6-8 hours apart, because these may be initially negative, especially within 2-4 hours of chest pain.
- Consider additional measurements of CK-MB, or troponin if initially negative, for patients who have persistent or recurrent symptoms or if index of suspicion is high.
- Absolute elevations of CK-MB or troponin levels are highly specific evidence of myocardial cell death. This finding typically means 1 of 2 scenarios. Elevations are indicative of an unstable coronary plaque that has produced brief coronary thrombosis or distal arterial microemboli. This may foreshadow subsequent complete coronary occlusion and is therefore treated aggressively with antiplatelet therapy. Cardiac enzyme elevation in the context of renal insufficiency, CHF, or severe noncardiac illness, is sometimes considered the result of secondary myocardial cell death. Although this finding indicates an increased likelihood of adverse events, it may signify myocardial stress but not unstable plaque.
- Troponin I levels of 0.4 ng/mL or higher or troponin T levels of 0.1 ng/mL or higher are considered positive and have been associated with higher short-term and midterm mortality. More importantly, outcomes in patients with troponin-positive results have been shown to be improved by aggressive treatment strategies that include an early cardiac catheterization strategy or use of IV glycoprotein IIb/IIIa platelet receptor antagonists.
- The temporal trends of these assays are helpful in interpreting difficult cases, and mild elevations of CK-MB or troponins from a lower baseline with subsequent falls in levels strongly indicate the occurrence of myonecrosis. Troponin levels also may still capture evidence of a cardiac event in patients who delay their presentation to the hospital because its serum half-life is longer than that of CK-MB and can remain elevated for 7-14 days after an event.
- On the other hand, once elevated, cardiac troponins are no longer useful in evaluating recurrent chest pain with myocardial injury, whereas CK-MB permits detection of reinfarction.
- Qualitative bedside troponin assay results may be difficult to interpret in patients with renal insufficiency.
- Clinical tip: Besides the ECG findings, troponin levels are now a centerpiece for diagnosis and prognostication in cases of unstable angina. Two sets of troponin results obtained 6-8 hours apart rules out NQMI but only if no new symptoms or ECG change has occurred since the last blood draw.
- Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)
- A TACTICS/TIMI 18 substudy showed that BNP is an independent predictor of short- and long-term mortality and risk of CHF in patients presenting with unstable angina.
- Elevated BNP levels have also been linked to more significant coronary artery lesions in patients with unstable angina, including greater LAD involvement.
- BNP levels may add incremental information to the assessment of patients with unstable angina but should be used in context with other cardiac markers to guide medical decision making. The cost effectiveness of routine use of multiple cardiac biomarkers has not been established.
- Elevated serum CRP levels on admission indicate worse short- and long-term mortality in patients with unstable angina.
- Patients with elevated CRP levels at time of discharge are at greater risk for recurrent MI.
- In the absence of other inflammatory states, high-sensitivity CRP determination can refine risk stratification of patients with unstable angina. The TIMI 11A substudy showed that even for patients with a negative troponin test result, elevated CRP levels portend a higher mortality rate than that of patients in whom both troponin and CRP are negative (5.8% vs 0.36).
- CRP may add incremental information to cardiac enzymes but its role in medical decision-making in the acute setting remains unclear.
Imaging Studies:
- Perform chest radiography to evaluate patients for signs of CHF and for other causes of chest symptoms such as pneumothorax, pulmonary infection or masses, pulmonary hypertension, and mediastinal widening.
- If available on a prompt basis, echocardiography can provide a quick evaluation of left ventricular function for prognosis (worse when LVEF is <40%) or for diagnosis, such as when new segmental wall motion abnormality is detected (eg, in postinfarction or postrevascularization chest pain in which baseline left ventricular function is known). However, keep in mind that small infarcts may not be manifest on the echocardiogram.
- Important causes of chest pain, such as aortic stenosis and HOCM, can be readily detected by echocardiography.
- Transesophageal echocardiography, CT angiography (CTA), or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is invaluable when aortic dissection is being ruled out.
- MRI has emerging applications for identifying ischemia (space-time maps of impaired blood arrival), infarction (wall thinning, scar, delayed enhancement), and wall motion abnormalities that may be coupled with coronary artery assessment with MRA in the future.
- Clinical tip: TEE is highly recommended if the clinical picture suggests the possibility of a valvular or mechanical complication of MI, or for patients who are not following the expected hospital course.
Other Tests:
- Exercise testing is not typically performed in the acute phase of unstable angina or in subjects with recent rest angina. However, subjects in whom disease activity becomes controlled after several days of medical therapy may safely undergo stress testing before hospital discharge.
- When feasible, predischarge testing is preferential to testing weeks to months following discharge because no prognostic value is lost with early testing, and because a relatively high proportion of adverse cardiac events occur earlier rather than later.
- Predischarge exercise tests add independent prognostic information to known important clinical descriptors such as recurrent rest pain and evolutionary T wave changes. For example, patients who had a reversible defect on nuclear stress testing had a 25% incidence of death or MI at 1 year compared to only 2% for those with a negative scan. Among men, shorter exercise duration, lower maximal rate-pressure product, and exercise-induced angina or ST-segment depression have correlated with unfavorable outcome.
- Although the negative predictive value is on the order of 90% across the board for all modalities of stress tests, the positive predictive value is poor (16-19%) for exercise or adenosine stress tests and only moderately better for the imaging stress tests (31-48%).
- Many chest pain centers are evaluating the strategy of early stress testing to triage low-risk patients expeditiously. The Emergency Room Assessment of Sestamibi for Evaluation of Chest Pain (ERASE Chest Pain) randomized clinical trial compared usual care versus usual care plus a resting perfusion scan in patients with normal or nondiagnostic ECG for ischemia. The study showed a 32% reduction in the odds of being unnecessarily admitted to the hospital without sacrificing safety in patients without ischemia who underwent early nuclear perfusion scanning. Patients who have a moderate likelihood of CAD but are stratified to be at low risk for events probably can safely perform the exercise stress test at 6 hours.
- No large studies comparing the performance characteristics of the different stress-testing modalities in the specific setting of unstable angina are available.
Procedures:
- The first line of assessment in any patient with suspected unstable angina is the 12-lead ECG, which should be obtained within 10 minutes of the patient's arrival at the emergency department. The diagnostic accuracy of an ECG is enhanced if a prior tracing is available for comparison.
- This allows detection of the highest-risk chest pain syndrome in patients who may in fact be in the midst of acute MI and thereby allows immediate triage to revascularization therapy. This is manifested by an ST elevation, new left bundle-branch block (LBBB), or peaked T wave (early)–type MI on ECG.
- The next level of high-risk patients includes those with ST depression greater than 1 mm on ECG; about half have subendocardial myocardial necrosis. In particular, ST depression carries relatively high in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality rates regardless of cardiac enzyme status, though the reason for this is unclear.
- New or reversible ST-segment deviation of 0.5 mm or more from baseline has been associated with a higher incidence (15.8% vs 8.2%) of 1-year death or MI in the TIMI-III Registry ECG Ancillary Study.
- Primary T wave changes are neither sensitive nor specific for ischemia, but they become an important clue in the context of symptoms or if the QRS–to–T wave angle is greater than 60°. Isolated symmetric T wave inversion does not appear to carry additional adverse prognosis.
- Clinical tip: The presence of ST-segment elevation or depression on ECG indicates high risk and must therefore be detected and acted on as soon as possible.
- Patients with the following clinical characteristics should be referred for immediate cardiac catheterization:
- Cardiogenic shock
- Severe left ventricular dysfunction
- Angina refractory to medical therapy
- Acute mitral regurgitation
- New ventricular septal defect
- Unstable tachyarrhythmias
- In patients with unstable angina but without the clinical characteristics listed above, whether an invasive strategy (routine cardiac catheterization with possible revascularization) yields benefits over conservative management is controversial. The debate has been settled in light of data from recent large randomized clinical trials.
- Among patients presenting with unstable angina, approximately 15% have 1-vessel CAD, 35% have 2-vessel CAD, and 50% have 3-vessel CAD. The incidence of left main disease is roughly 5-10%. The rate of thrombus detected at coronary angiography ranges widely from <10% among those with chest pain in the previous month >50% among those with rest angina in the preceding 24 hours. This high prevalence of significant disease has led some to advocate routine angiography, whereas the imperfect ability to predict who will develop long-term adverse events has encouraged a tendency toward permissive revascularization.
- Older clinical trials, such as TIMI III-B, the Veterans Affairs Non–Q-Wave Infarction Strategies In-Hospital (VANQWISH) study, and the Medicine Versus Angiography in Thrombolytic Exclusion (MATE) trial did not show superiority of routine catheterization compared with the conservative approach of performing catheterization in only those with recurrent ischemic symptoms or a significantly positive stress test result. This is because of the early hazard observed with angioplasty performed in the acute setting of myocardial ischemia, which resulted in heightened rates of abrupt vessel closure, stent thrombosis, or MI.
- The introduction of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors has neutralized most of these periprocedural complications so that an early benefit is now observed with contemporary PCI. The Treat Angina with Aggrastat and Determine Cost of Therapy with an Invasive or Conservative Strategy (TACTICS/TIMI-18) study showed very low 30-day and 6-month composite endpoint of death, MI, or rehospitalization for the early invasive strategy. This entailed the administration of IV glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist (tirofiban) coupled with angiography within 48 hours and a 60% revascularization rate within the index hospitalization compared with 36% for conservative therapy. The benefit of early invasive strategy was more substantial in intermediate- and high-risk patients (ie, those with TIMI scores 3).
- The Scandinavian Fragmin during Instability in Coronary Artery Disease (FRISC II) trial showed a significant reduction in death or MI at 6 months in patients with unstable angina who underwent early catheterization and revascularization as compared with a noninvasive strategy. This treatment difference was primarily driven by a lower rate of MI in the invasive arm (7.8% vs 10.1%). Patients in the invasive arm also had a significant reduction in angina and hospital readmission rates. Again the treatment benefits were more pronounced in those with ST segment depression and cardiac marker elevation.
- The Randomized Intervention Trial of Unstable Angina (RITA 3) also found benefit with the invasive strategy over conservative management in intermediate to high-risk patients with non–ST-segment elevation MI and ischemic changes on ECG or elevated troponin levels. The combined endpoint of death, MI, and refractory angina at 4 months was significantly reduced in the invasive arm (9.6%) versus the conservative arm (7.6%) at 4 months.
- Data from the Intracoronary Stenting Angiographic Results Cooling-Off (ISAR-COOL) Trial also suggested a significant benefit from earlier catheterization within 6 hours versus 3-5 days in patients with non–ST-segment elevation MI.
- Based on these trial results, the current AHA/ACC Guidelines recommend an early invasive treatment strategy for patient high-risk clinical predictors.
Table 4. AHA/ACC Recommendations for an Early Invasive Strategy
| Class |
Recommendation |
| I |
- An early invasive strategy in patients with unstable angina/non–ST-segment elevation MI and any of the following high-risk indicators. (level of evidence: A
- Recurrent angina/ischemia at rest or with low- level activities despite intensive anti-ischemic therapy
- Elevated TnT or TnI
- New or presumably new ST-segment depression
- Recurrent angina/ischemia with CHF symptoms, an S3 gallop, pulmonary edema, worsening rales, or new or worsening MI
- High-risk findings on noninvasive stress testing
- Depressed LV systolic function (eg, EF < 0.40 on noninvasive study)
- Hemodynamic instability
- Sustained ventricular tachycardia
- PCI within 6 months
- Previous CABG
- In the absence of these findings, either an early conservative or an early invasive strategy in hospitalized patients without contraindications for revascularization. (level of evidence: B)
|
| IIa |
- An early invasive strategy in patients with repeated presentations for ACS despite therapy and without evidence for ongoing ischemia or high risk. (level of evidence: C)
|
| III |
- Coronary angiography in patients with extensive comorbidities (eg, liver or pulmonary failure, cancer), in whom the risks of revascularization are not likely to outweigh the benefits. (level of evidence: C)
- Coronary angiography in patients with acute chest pain and a low likelihood of ACS. (level of evidence: C)
- Coronary angiography in patients who will not consent to revascularization regardless of the findings. (level of evidence: C)
|
Note.—Class I = Conditions for which there is evidence and/or general agreement that a given procedure or treatment is useful and effective.
Class II = Conditions for which there is conflicting evidence and/or a divergence of opinion about the usefulness/efficacy of a procedure or treatment. Class IIa = Weight of evidence/opinion is in favor of usefulness/efficacy. Class IIb = Usefulness/efficacy is less well established by evidence/opinion.
Class III - Conditions for which there is evidence and/or general agreement that the procedure/treatment is not useful/effective and in some cases may be harmful
|   |
TREATMENT
| Section 6 of 11  |
|
Medical Care: Because the course of unstable angina is highly variable and potentially life threatening, the aggressiveness of the course of unstable angina is highly variable and potentially life threatening, the aggressiveness of approach or level of care needs to be established expeditiously. The obvious goal of therapy is to reverse the oxygen supply-demand mismatch by minimizing requirements and maximizing delivery of tissue nutrients. Secondary or precipitating factors, such as anemia, hypoxemia, thyroid dysfunction, or febrile illness, should be sought and corrected.
Specific therapy for primary causes of ischemia should be directed at each pathophysiologic origin of unstable angina: increased myocardial rate-pressure product, coronary vasoconstriction, platelet aggregation, and thrombosis.
Patients with unstable angina require admission to the hospital. IV access should be obtained and supplemental oxygen started. Initial management involves antiplatelet therapy (aspirin, clopidogrel, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists), anticoagulation (heparin), beta-blockade, nitrates, and consideration for cardiac catheterization. Further medical management includes lipid-lowering therapy (statins) and use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors
Medications that provide symptomatic relief but have not been found to have an effect on long-term major events include nitrates, diltiazem or verapamil, other medications used to treat unstable angina, and heparin. Medications that have compelling evidence for reducing short- or long-term adverse events are aspirin, beta-adrenergic blocking agents, lipid-lowering agents (statins), ACE inhibitors, clopidogrel, and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists. (These are discussed below.)
Clinical tip: The standard of care dictates that at the minimum, aspirin, beta-blockers, and statins, should be given promptly to all patients presenting with ACS unless they have a valid contraindication. - Aspirin
- Administer chewable aspirin 325 mg promptly to patients who are not at high risk for bleeding, who do not have ongoing bleeding, or who do not have true intolerance or allergy.
- Timeliness of administration is essential because platelet aggregation is central to ACS, and the peak effect of aspirin can be observed within as short a time as 30 minutes.
- Several studies have shown approximately 40-50% risk reductions for death or MI with aspirin at 30-day follow-up and at up to 1-year follow-up in this patient population.
- After initial dose, a decreased dose of 75-150 mg may be continued indefinitely.
- Beta-blockers
- Several controlled trials have demonstrated the benefits of beta-blockers in the treatment of MI.
- Early use of IV beta-blockers (e.g., metoprolol) is preferred as it is associated with a lower rate of recurrent MI or death when compared to later therapy.
- After initial treatment, patient may be switched to oral regimen for chronic therapy.
- HMG coenzyme A reductase inhibitors
- Multiple large, randomized, secondary prevention trials including the Heart Protection Study have demonstrated significant mortality benefit from statin therapy.
- Recent results from the MIRACL and Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy (PROVE-IT) TIMI trials suggest that early initiation of antilipidemic agents (statins) in patients with ACS can decrease adverse events within a relatively short term.
- The PROVE IT-TIMI 22 trial demonstrated a benefit from statin therapy even in ACS patients presenting with relatively low serum LDL-C levels (LDL-C<100 mg/dL suggesting that the target LDL-C level should be less than 80 mg/dL in these patients.
- Statin therapy should be initiated before hospital discharge and clinical benefit may be gained by starting within 24-96 hours of admission.
- ACE inhibitors
- ACE-Inhibitors are of particular benefit in patients with large anterior infarctions especially with compromised left ventricular function (eg, from ST-elevation MI). The benefit in patients with unstable angina is less clear.
- Currently, ACE inhibitors are recommended in patients with left ventricular dysfunction or CHF, diabetes, and hypertension.
- ACE-Inhibitor therapy may be started within 24 hours of admission and titrated for BP effect.
- Clopidogrel
- Clopidogrel is recommended as the antiplatelet of choice in those patients who are intolerant to aspirin, and it is also used adjunctive antiplatelet agent in addition to aspirin.
- The CURE trial showed that clopidogrel in addition to aspirin (vs aspirin alone) significantly reduced the composite primary end point of cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke with early benefit shown at 24 hours.
- PCI CURE and CREDO trials have shown significant benefit in those patients with unstable angina who undergo coronary intervention and pretreatment 6 hours before intervention was associated with improved outcomes. However, patients who later undergo CABG (eg, those with multivessel disease) while receiving clopidogrel have an increased risk of major bleeding and requirement for surgery for bleeding.
- Some experts still advocate loading patients with clopidogrel 300 mg in addition to aspirin on presentation since the benefit obtained from clopidogrel pretreatment in CREDO was greater than the added risk in the minority of patients who go on to require CABG.
- Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists
- In patients who are undergoing PCI (ie, those with high-risk characteristics), therapy should be started with a small-molecule IV glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor for medical stabilization.
- If the patient can be catheterized within first few hours of presentation and is pain free, it is acceptable alternative to simply commence abciximab in the catheterization laboratory in conjunction with percutaneous revascularization. This is based on the findings of the Do Tirofiban and ReoPro Give Similar Efficacy Trial (TARGET) trial which confirmed the superiority of abciximab over tirofiban in an interventional setting; though a slight excess of about 2% minor bleeding (<5 g/dL) and about 2% thrombocytopenia is documented with abciximab use.
- All of the currently available glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, namely, abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban, have been shown to increase the safety of acute percutaneous revascularization, with relative risk reductions in adverse events (including 30-day mortality and infarction) of approximately 30-50%.
- Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists have also shown to be of benefit in high-risk patients (troponin positive, ongoing ischemia, or other high-risk features) treated with medical management alone. The relative reduction in adverse events observed in this setting is on the order of 5-7%, and only with tirofiban, eptifibatide, and lamifiban. In addition, a recent meta-analysis of 6 randomized trials (with 31,400 patients) failed to show a mortality benefit in those patients who did not undergo PCI. Judgment is required to decide whether this small benefit offsets the risk of bleeding events.
- Heparin
- Low-molecular-weight heparin and IV unfractionated heparin are 2 comparable anticoagulation strategies in the treatment of unstable angina.
- The ESSENCE investigators compared low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) with unfractionated heparin. The revascularization rate in this study was intermediate at about 30%. The 30-day composite rates of death, MI, or recurrent angina were significantly reduced for subjects taking low-molecular-weight heparin (19.8% vs 23.3%, relative risk reduction of 15%). However, excess minor bleeding occurred in 11.9% vs 7.2% of cases, an important proportion of which were only due to injection site ecchymosis.
- The Superior Yield of the New strategy of Enoxaparin Revascularization and Glycoprotien IIb/IIIa Inhibitors (SYNERGY) trial randomized high-risk patients with non–ST-segment elevation MI (including those with unstable angina) to unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin. All enrolled patients were treated with an early invasive strategy. No difference in composite endpoint (death or MI by 30 days) was detected. Enoxaparin was associated with more major bleeding episodes than with unfractionated heparin (9.1% vs 7.6%); however, much of this effect was attributed to patients who crossover to unfractionated heparin after receiving initial dose of enoxaparin.
- Enoxaparin and unfractionated heparin are safe alternative agents used in the treatment of unstable angina, though enoxaparin is associated with a modest increased risk of major bleeding. Switching agents is associated with increased bleeding and reduced clinical benefit.
- Nitrates
- IV nitrate agents may be used in the treatment of ischemic chest pain, symptoms of heart failure, or hypertension but are not associated with appreciable long-term clinical benefit.
- These agents are contraindicated for those with right ventricular infarction, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and severe aortic stenosis.
- Direct thrombin inhibitors
- Direct thrombin inhibitors, such as hirudin, lepirudin, or bivalrudin, are potential alternatives to heparin.
- These agents are much more costly than conventional anticoagulation agents and are associated with higher rates of bleeding.
- Direct thrombin inhibitors should not be routinely used in the treatment of unstable angina but may be of clinical benefit in special circumstances (eg, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia).
- Other medications
- Calcium channel antagonists, antibiotics against Chlamydia pneumoniae, or fibrinolytic agents currently have no established role in the setting of unstable angina.
- Most of the clinical trials of fibrinolytic therapy showed a tendency for more nonfatal infarctions attributed to procoagulant effects in the context of a nonocclusive thrombus.
- While the available data suggest similar efficacy of ticlopidine to aspirin, the use of this drug in the United States has been drastically reduced since reports of associated fatal thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.
Surgical Care: Patients at moderate-to-high risk for adverse events, such as those with ST depression greater than 1 mm on ECG, troponin positivity or NQMI, or chest pain refractory to medical therapy, should be scheduled for cardiac catheterization with likely revascularization within the next 48 hours. The TACTICS/TIMI-18 trial showed that this early invasive strategy reduced 30-day rates of death, MI, or rehospitalization for unstable angina from 19.4% to 15.9%, or a relative risk reduction of 18%. - FRISC II showed that even a delayed invasive strategy (mean time to revascularization 4 days, 71% revascularization rate vs 9% in the conservative arm) coupled with low-molecular-weight heparin (dalteparin) therapy provides durable benefit for individual hard endpoints. At 1 year, the invasive group had statistically significant reductions in death (2.2% vs 3.9%, relative risk reduction, 43%) and MI (8.6% vs 11.6%, relative risk reduction, 26%).
- FRISC II has been the only randomized clinical trial able to show a mortality benefit. This was likely because of the very strict criteria for revascularization, which resulted in only 9% of the conservative arm receiving PCI or CABG. For example, in the TACTICS/TIMI-18 study and other North American trials, approximately 50% of the patients in the conservative arm had some form of revascularization, and not all in the invasive strategy arm had indications for PCI or CABG. Therefore, the benefits of revascularization were less striking because of the narrower differences in rates of revascularization.
- Of note, by 1 year, a catch-up phenomenon was observed in patients who had initial conservative management. By then, 52% had undergone angiography, and 43% required revascularization (see Image 3).
- The cost-benefit ratio of an initial invasive approach based on the FRISC II trial has been estimated. At the cost of 15 extra CABG and 21 PCI procedures, the benefit per 100 patients per year is as follows:
- 1.7 lives saved
- 2 MIs prevented
- 20 readmissions prevented
- Earlier and better symptom relief
- CABG is usually the preferred method for revascularization in patients with the following conditions:
- Left main trunk artery stenosis
- Poor left ventricular function
- Significant 3-vessel CAD or 2-vessel disease that involves the proximal left anterior descending artery
- Diabetes mellitus with focal stenosis in more than one vessel
- Concomitant severe valvular disease that requires open heart surgery
- Continuous observation by Holter monitoring can provide helpful information. Depending on the criteria of ST-segment deviation, the timing of monitoring relative to disease instability, and the intervening medical therapy, incidence of abnormal ST-segment shifts has been reported at 11-66% in unstable angina.
- Up to 92% of these abnormal ST-segment shifts are asymptomatic, and more importantly, patients experiencing such episodes had an associated higher adverse event rate than those without (48% vs 20%).
- Other studies have documented unfavorable outcomes at up to 6 months with the presence of at least one hour of silent ischemia during initial admission
Consultations: - Cardiologist - To assist in risk stratification and decision-making, to expedite further cardiac testing (eg, echocardiography, stress testing, angiography), and to treat unstable patients
- Critical care or telemetry unit specialist - For acute care and monitoring
- Cardiothoracic surgeon - In case CABG is necessary
Diet: This condition may require patients to take nothing orally if stress testing or an invasive procedure is anticipated. Otherwise, a diet low in cholesterol and saturated fat is recommended. Sodium restriction should be instituted for patients with heart failure or hypertension. Activity: - Rehabilitation and preventive services: While secondary prevention is the responsibility of the primary care provider and the cardiologist, some centers have specialized and more effective teams (eg, cardiac rehabilitation, preventive services) that can offer more intensive and perhaps more effective counseling and follow-up.
- Bed rest is indicated until clinical risk stratification is accomplished.
- For patients at high risk for adverse events, bed rest is indicated until definitive therapy is administered.
- For patients at intermediate risk for adverse events, bed rest is indicated until further testing or definitive therapy.
|   |
MEDICATION
| Section 7 of 11  |
|
The goals of pharmacotherapy are to reduce morbidity and to prevent complications.
Drug Category: Antiplatelet agents -- These agents prevent formation of thrombi associated with MI and inhibit platelet function by blocking aggregation. Antiplatelet therapy has been shown to reduce mortality by reducing the risk of fatal MIs, fatal strokes, and vascular death. Pooled data from over 2000 patients revealed reduction of death or MI from 11.8% to 6% with aspirin in cases of unstable angina. A recent randomized clinical trial involving 12,562 patients showed a reduction of cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke from 11.4% to 9.3% by adding clopidogrel to aspirin therapy. Drug Name
| Aspirin (Anacin, Bayer Buffered Aspirin, Ecotrin) -- Administer as soon as possible. Inhibits cyclo-oxygenase, which produces thromboxane A2, a potent platelet activator. Early administration has been shown to reduce mortality. |
|---|
| Adult Dose | 160-324 mg PO qd |
|---|
| Pediatric Dose | Not established |
|---|
| Contraindications | Documented hypersensitivity; liver damage; hypoprothrombinemia; vitamin K deficiency; bleeding disorders; asthma; patients <16 y with influenza (because of association of aspirin with Reye syndrome) |
|---|
| Interactions | Effects may decrease with antacids and urinary alkalinizers; corticosteroids decrease salicylate serum levels; additive hypoprothrombinemic effects and increased bleeding time may occur with coadministration of anticoagulants; may antagonize uricosuric effects of probenecid and increase toxicity of phenytoin and valproic acid; doses >2 g/d may potentiate glucose-lowering effect of sulfonylurea drugs |
|---|
| Pregnancy |
D - Unsafe in pregnancy
|
|---|
| Precautions | May cause transient decrease in renal function and aggravate chronic renal disease; avoid use in patients with severe anemia, those with history of blood coagulation defects, or those taking anticoagulants |
|---|
Drug Name
| Clopidogrel (Plavix) -- Selectively inhibits adenosine diphosphate (ADP) binding to platelet receptor and subsequent ADP-mediated activation of glycoprotein llb/llla complex, thereby inhibiting platelet aggregation. This agent is used as an alternative to aspirin or in addition to aspirin after coronary stenting [CAPRIE Steering Committee, 1996 #158].
The recently concluded randomized clinical trial Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Events (CURE) showed an absolute risk reduction in cardiac death, MI, or stroke of 2.1% (11.4% down to 9.3% at 1-y) at the cost of increased major bleeding by 1.0% (3.7% versus 2.7%).| Adult Dose | CURE protocol for unstable angina patients within 24 h of symptom onset: 300 mg loading dose PO followed by 75 mg PO qd for 3-12 mo (mean = 9 mo) in conjunction with aspirin 75-325 mg/d PO |
|---|
| Pediatric Dose | Not established |
|---|
| Contraindications | Documented hypersensitivity; active pathological bleeding, such as peptic ulcer, or intracranial hemorrhage |
|---|
| Interactions | Coadministration with naproxen is associated with increased occult GI blood loss; clopidogrel prolongs bleeding time; safety of coadministration with warfarin not established |
|---|
| Pregnancy |
C - Safety for use during pregnancy has not been established.
|
|---|
| Precautions | Caution in patients at increased risk of bleeding from trauma, surgery, or other pathological conditions; caution in patients with lesions with propensity to bleed (eg, ulcers) |
|---|
|
|---|
Drug Category: HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors -- Used to treat hypercholesterolemia. Highly efficacious and very well tolerated.Drug Name
| Atorvastatin (Lipitor) -- Can provide up to 60% reduction in LDL-C. Inhibits 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA reductase), which in turn inhibits cholesterol synthesis and increases cholesterol metabolism. The half-life of atorvastatin and active metabolites is longer than that of all the other statins (ie, approximately 48 h compared to 3-4 h).
The Myocardial Ischemia Reduction with Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering (MIRACL) randomized clinical trial randomized 3086 patients with unstable angina to high-dose atorvastatin versus placebo. Therapy resulted in a reduction in the primary endpoint (ie, death, MI, resuscitated cardiac arrest, severe recurrent symptomatic ischemia) from 17.4% to 14.8% (P = .048) within a relatively short period of 4 mo. The benefit was mostly for recurrent symptomatic ischemia with objective evidence and requiring emergency rehospitalization (8.4% down to 6.2%, P = .02).| Adult Dose | 10 mg PO qd in the evening; titrate to a maximum 80 mg/d prn
MIRACL protocol: 80 mg PO qd commenced within 1-4 d after admission for unstable angina, continue for at least 16 wk| Pediatric Dose | Not established |
|---|
| Contraindications | Documented hypersensitivity; significant hepatic impairment; pregnancy; breastfeeding |
|---|
| Interactions | Toxicity increases when coadministered with triazole antifungals, CNS depressants, macrolide antibiotics, and mibefradil; atorvastatin increases the action of anticoagulants and levothyroxine |
|---|
| Pregnancy |
X - Contraindicated in pregnancy |
|---|
| Precautions | Thirty-one cases of rhabdomyolysis (out of 1.33 million total prescriptions) were reported in Canada, resulting in 1 death associated with concomitant use of gemfibrozil, a fibric acid derivative; concomitant use with nicotinic acid (niacin) also advised
Stop drug use or decrease doses for elevations of transaminases more than 3 times the upper limit of the reference range; elevations generally resolve upon withdrawal of drug; if symptoms of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis occur, stop the drug and obtain a CK
Do not exceed daily dose; caution in patients receiving drugs that prolong QRS or Q-T interval; monitor transaminase levels before treatment, at 6 wk and 12 wk, then q6mo |
|---|
|
|---|
|
|---|
Drug Category: Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists -- Up to 80,000 copies of these integrins on the platelet cell surface serve as ligands for fibrinogen cross-linkage, the final common pathway for platelet aggregation and thrombus formation, even under arterial shear stress conditions. To date, more than 40,000 patients have been enrolled in randomized clinical trials evaluating glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists in ACS. These trials have shown 30-day relative risk reductions of 22–56% in composite end points, with beneficial trends in each of the component outcomes, largely in association with percutaneous coronary intervention.Drug Name
| Tirofiban (Aggrastat) -- Nonpeptide antagonist of platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor that reversibly prevents von Willebrand factor, fibrinogen, and other adhesion ligands from binding to the GP IIb/IIIa receptor, thereby inhibiting platelet aggregation. Effects persist over the duration of maintenance infusion and are reversed after stopping the infusion. Approved by the FDA for use in combination with heparin for patients with ACS who are being managed medically and for those undergoing PCI.
Dose should be halved in patients with severe renal insufficiency (CrCl <30 mL/min).| Adult Dose | 0.4 mcg/kg/min IV for 30 min, followed by 0.1 mcg/kg/min for up to 72 h
If CrCl <30 mL/min, then reduce dose by 50%| Pediatric Dose | Not established |
|---|
| Contraindications | Documented hypersensitivity; severe hypertension (systolic BP >200 mm Hg); active internal bleeding; history of intracranial hemorrhage, intracranial neoplasm, arteriovenous malformation, or aneurysm; acute pericarditis; bleeding diathesis; trauma or stroke within previous 30 d; platelet count <100,000/mm3; history of thrombocytopenia following exposure to this product; serum creatinine >2 mg/dL (for 180 mcg/kg bolus and 2 mcg/kg/min infusion) or >4 mg/dL (for 135 mcg/kg bolus and 0.5 mcg/kg/min infusion); history of bleeding diathesis within 30 d; intracranial hemorrhage; history of hemorrhagic stroke; severe hypertension (systolic BP >200 mm Hg or diastolic BP >110 mm Hg); major surgical procedure within past mo |
|---|
| Interactions | Possible increased risk of bleeding with coadministration of heparin or aspirin; closely monitor when using concurrently with drugs that affect hemostasis (eg, warfarin) |
|---|
| Pregnancy |
B - Usually safe but benefits must outweigh the risks.
|
|---|
| Precautions | Bleeding events are the most common complications encountered during therapy with eptifibatide; caution with platelet count <150,000/mm3 and hemorrhagic retinopathy; prior to treatment, monitor platelet counts, serum creatinine, hemoglobin, hematocrit, and PT/aPTT within 6 h after loading infusion and at least daily thereafter (more frequently if evidence of significant decline); because these agents inhibit platelet aggregation, caution when using concurrently with drugs that affect hemostasis (eg, thrombolytics, ticlopidine, NSAIDs, warfarin, dipyridamole, clopidogrel); measure ACT and maintain aPTT 50-70 seconds unless a PCI needs to be performed; maintain ACT 300-350 seconds during PCI; if platelet count decreases to <100,000/mm3, perform additional platelet counts to exclude pseudothrombocytopenia; if thrombocytopenia is confirmed, discontinue GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and heparin and appropriately monitor and treat the condition; to monitor unfractionated heparin, monitor aPTT 6 h
after beginning heparin infusion; adjust to maintain aPTT higher than 2 times baseline |
|---|
|
|---|
|
|---|
Drug Name
| Eptifibatide (Integrilin) -- Cyclic heptapeptide antagonist of the platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor that reversibly prevents von Willebrand factor, fibrinogen, and other adhesion ligands from binding to the GP IIb/IIIa receptor, thereby inhibiting platelet aggregation. Effects persist over duration of maintenance infusion and are reversed when infusion ends. Approved by the FDA for use in combination with heparin for patients with ACS, patients who are being managed medically, and for those undergoing PCI. |
|---|
| Adult Dose | Unstable angina: 180 mcg/kg IV bolus, followed by continuous infusion of 2 mcg/kg/min for up to 72 h
Undergoing PCI: Additional 180 mcg/kg IV bolus 10 min after the first bolus
For patients with serum Cr >2 mg/dL: Lower dose to 135 mcg/kg bolus and 0.5 mcg/kg/min infusion| Pediatric Dose | Not established |
|---|
| Contraindications | Documented hypersensitivity; severe hypertension (systolic BP >200 mm Hg); active internal bleeding; history of intracranial hemorrhage, intracranial neoplasm, arteriovenous malformation or aneurysm, acute pericarditis, or bleeding diathesis; trauma or stroke within previous 30 d; platelet count <100,000/mm3; history of thrombocytopenia following prior exposure to this product; serum Cr >4 mg/dL |
|---|
| Interactions | Possible increased risk of bleeding with coadministration of heparin, warfarin, or aspirin; closely monitor when using other drugs that affect hemostasis |
|---|
| Pregnancy |
B - Usually safe but benefits must outweigh the risks.
|
|---|
| Precautions | Bleeding events are the most common complications encountered during therapy with eptifibatide; caution in platelet count <150,000/mm3 and hemorrhagic retinopathy; because agent inhibits platelet aggregation, caution when using concurrently with drugs that affect hemostasis (eg, thrombolytics, ticlopidine, NSAIDs, warfarin, dipyridamole, clopidogrel); measure ACT and maintain aPTT 50-70 seconds unless a PCI needs to be performed; maintain ACT 250-350 seconds during a PCI; if platelets decrease to <100,000/mm3, perform additional platelet counts to exclude possibility of pseudothrombocytopenia; if thrombocytopenia is confirmed, discontinue GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and heparin and appropriately monitor and treat the condition; monitor aPTT 6 h after start of heparin infusion and at least daily thereafter |
|---|
|
|---|
Drug Category: Platelet aggregation inhibitors -- Inhibit platelet aggregation.Drug Name
| Abciximab (ReoPro) -- Chimeric human-murine monoclonal antibody approved for use in elective/urgent/emergent PCI. Binds to receptor with high affinity and reduces platelet aggregation by 80% for up to 48 h following infusion. The recently concluded GUSTO-4 randomized clinical trial did not show any benefit for abciximab in medically treated patients who do not undergo PCI. In fact, longer duration of abciximab use was associated with a negative trend in event rates. On the other hand, in the context of PCI, it has been shown to be superior to tirofiban. |
|---|
| Adult Dose | 0.25 mg/kg IV bolus, followed by 10 mcg/min IV for 12 h after PCI |
|---|
| Pediatric Dose | Not established |
|---|
| Contraindications | Documented hypersensitivity; severe hypertension (systolic BP >200 mm Hg); active internal bleeding; history of intracranial hemorrhage, intracranial neoplasm, arteriovenous malformation or aneurysm, acute pericarditis, or bleeding diathesis; trauma or stroke within previous 30 d; platelet count <100,000/mm3; history of thrombocytopenia following prior exposure to this product |
|---|
| Interactions | Possible increased risk of bleeding with coadministration with heparin, warfarin, or aspirin; closely monitor when using other drugs that affect hemostasis |
|---|
| Pregnancy |
B - Usually safe but benefits must outweigh the risks.
|
|---|
| Precautions | Bleeding events are the most common complications encountered during therapy with abciximab; caution in platelet count <150,000/mm3 and hemorrhagic retinopathy; because agent inhibits platelet aggregation, caution when using concurrently with drugs that affect hemostasis (eg, thrombolytics, ticlopidine, NSAIDs, warfarin, dipyridamole, clopidogrel); measure ACT and maintain aPTT 50-70 seconds unless a PCI needs to be performed; maintain ACT 250-350 seconds during a PCI; if platelets decrease to <100,000/mm3, perform additional platelet counts to exclude possibility of pseudothrombocytopenia; if thrombocytopenia is confirmed, discontinue GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and heparin and appropriately monitor and treat condition; monitor aPTT 6 h after start of heparin infusion and at least daily thereafter; abciximab is associated with an incidence of thrombocytopenia in approximately 2% of patients |
|---|
Drug Category: Beta-adrenergic blocking agents -- Limit heart rate and reduce blood pressure to decrease myocardial oxygen demand, oppose effects of elevated catecholamines, and produce antiarrhythmic properties. Clinical trials of beta-adrenoreceptor blockers in cases of unstable angina have shown decreases in ischemic symptoms and in occurrence of MIs. In vitro studies have shown inhibition of platelet aggregation with this drug class. Infrequent situations in which beta-blocker therapy should be avoided in patients with unstable angina include nonischemic exacerbation of heart failure, cocaine-induced coronary vasoconstriction, and vasospastic angina.Drug Name
| Metoprolol (Lopressor, Toprol XL) -- Selective beta1-adrenergic receptor blocker that decreases automaticity of contractions. During IV administration, carefully monitor blood pressure, heart rate, and ECG. |
|---|
| Adult Dose | 5 mg IV slow infusion q5min up to 3 times until resolution of angina or titrate to reduce heart rate to 50-70 bpm |
|---|
| Pediatric Dose | Not established |
|---|
| Contraindications | Documented hypersensitivity; uncompensated congestive heart failure; bradycardia; asthma; cardiogenic shock; AV conduction abnormalities |
|---|
| Interactions | Aluminum salts, barbiturates, NSAIDs, penicillins, calcium salts, cholestyramine, and rifampin may decrease bioavailability and plasma levels of metoprolol, possibly resulting in decreased pharmacologic effects; toxicity of metoprolol may increase with coadministration of sparfloxacin, phenothiazines, astemizole, calcium channel blockers, quinidine, flecainide, and contraceptives; may increase toxicity of digoxin, flecainide, clonidine, epinephrine, nifedipine, prazosin, verapamil, and lidocaine |
|---|
| Pregnancy |
B - Usually safe but benefits must outweigh the risks.
|
|---|
| Precautions | Beta-adrenergic blockade may reduce signs and symptoms of acute hypoglycemia and may decrease clinical signs of hyperthyroidism; abrupt withdrawal may exacerbate symptoms of hyperthyroidism, including thyroid storm; closely monitor patient and slowly withdraw the drug; caution in patients taking other negative chronotropes or inotropes (eg, verapamil) |
|---|
Drug Name
| Esmolol (Brevibloc) -- Shown to reduce episodes of chest pain and clinical cardiac events compared to placebo. The very short half-life (8 min) allows a large degree of dosing flexibility, such that cardiovascular benefits are comparable to PO propranolol, yet adverse effects can be managed promptly. It is particularly useful for patients at risk for complications with beta-blockade (eg, reactive airway disease or COPD, severe bradycardia, or poor left ventricular function). |
|---|
| Adult Dose | 0.05 mg/kg/min IV over 1 min initially; 0.1 mg/kg/min IV maintenance; titrate in increments of 0.05 mg/kg/min q10-15min until resolution of angina, until heart rate of 50-70 bpm is attained, or until maximum dose of 0.2 mg/kg/min is reached |
|---|
| Pediatric Dose | Not established |
|---|
| Contraindications | Documented hypersensiti |
|---|
|