Continually Updated Clinical Reference
 
 
  All Sources     eMedicine     Medscape     Drug Reference     MEDLINE
 
eMedicine - Nasal Reconstruction : Article by

Quick Find
Authors & Editors
Introduction
Indications
RELEVANT ANATOMY
Contraindications
Workup
Treatment
Complications
Outcome And Prognosis
Future And Controversies
Multimedia
References




Patient Education
Click here for patient education.



Author: Ali Sajjadian, MD, Assistant Professor of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Private Practice, Newport Beach, California

Ali Sajjadian is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, American Medical Association, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, California Medical Association, Northeastern Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Pennsylvania Medical Society

Coauthor(s): Nima Naghshineh, BS, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Keshav T Magge, MD, Staff Physician, Department of Surgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center; Nathan E Nachlas, MD, Boca Raton Center for Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery; Rana Rofagha, MD, Consulting Staff, Department of Dermatology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group

Editors: Russell A Faust, MD, PhD, Consulting Staff, Department of Otolaryngology, Columbus Children's Hospital; Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine; Dominique Dorion, MD, MSc, FRCSC, Program Director and Division Chair, Professor of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, University of Sherbrooke, Canada; Christopher L Slack, MD, Otolaryngology-Facial Plastic Surgery, Private Practice, Associated Coastal ENT; Medical Director, Treasure Coast Sleep Disorders; Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA, Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine

Author and Editor Disclosure

Synonyms and related keywords: nasal reconstruction, total nasal reconstruction, reconstruction of the nose, nasal reconstruction techniques, rhinoplasty techniques, nasal defects, nasal anatomy, nasal surgery, rhinoplasty, Mohs micrographic surgery



The nose is arguably the most prominent aspect of the face. Reconstruction of the nose involves alterations and aesthetic details that cannot be easily hidden with clothing or apparel. The extreme 3-dimensionality of the nose allows slight structural modifications to have great ramifications. Thus, the reconstruction of a defect in the nose is all the more difficult because of the great many nuances the nose possesses.

History of the Procedure

The reconstruction of the nose goes back thousands of years. The ancient Hindus are credited with the first nasal reconstruction attempts. In ancient India, punishment involved having one's nose cut off, and such a defect was reportedly first repaired by transposing a cheek flap. The Italians also used reconstructive techniques for the nose during the Renaissance. The Branca family and Tagliacozzi experimented with flaps and rhinoplasty techniques. However, the British documented the Indian techniques of reconstruction they saw during their time in the subcontinent. Gillies, of England, formulated rules and techniques for nasal reconstruction. These efforts were passed on, expanded, and refined to form the multitude of reconstructive options available today.

Problem

Planning an operation involves not only the examination of the operative defect but also a discussion concerning the patient’s wishes for reconstruction. Several important aspects must be developed in the reconstructed nose. As described by Burget, contour, color, texture, and function are all important aspects in the reconstructed nose1, 2, 3.

Before determining how to properly perform nasal reconstruction, the aesthetic and anatomical breakdown of the nose must be understood. Anatomically, the nose is made up of a vascular lining, alar tip cartilages (sculptured cartilage), bone braces that buttress the dorsum and sidewalls of the nose, and thin skin that matches the rest of the face. Thus, when a deformity is present, the actual tissue missing must be delineated, whether it be the cover (skin), lining (mucosal lining, septal mucosa), or framework (septal hard tissue, alar cartilages, upper lateral cartilages, nasal bones, alar fibrofatty tissue). Also, the anatomical location of the defect and the surface extent of the defect must be examined.

Clinical

Initially, attention to the wound or wounds created by trauma or neoplasm excision is necessary. Determining the location, breadth, and depth of the wound or wounds is critical. Some small wounds may not require surgical intervention (eg, small defects of the medial canthus that may heal successfully by secondary intention), while other larger wounds may require extensive planning with a multistaged approach. The quality of surrounding skin and any indication of compromised vascular supply, such as scarring due to prior surgery or radiation therapy, should be considered. Identification of adjacent tissue with similar texture, color, and sebaceous gland density improves the aesthetic outcome. These factors often dictate the type of flap or graft needed for reconstruction.

Functional deficiencies such as airway patency should be identified and addressed prior to graft or flap placement. Prior existing asymmetry, functional deficiencies, and the possibility of skin mismatch are a few of the issues that need to be discussed with the patient prior to surgery.



The general indication for nasal reconstruction is a defect or loss of function of the nose that results from trauma or surgical excision of neoplasm. The preferred method for tumor removal is Mohs micrographic surgery. This technique is best suited for the removal of malignancies such as basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma that may have poorly defined margins or may be recurrent or aggressive in nature. Biopsy samples of all tumors should be collected beforehand for confirmation. Mohs micrographic surgery then allows for careful review of peripheral and deep margins using horizontal frozen sections of the specimen, allowing for accurate identification and excision of clinically inapparent tumor.

An initial operation may be necessary to release old scars, to re-establish patency or function, or to allow repositioning of normal tissues. However, the indications for each reconstructive procedure vary based on the site, size, and depth of the defect.

Aesthetic subunits of the nose (see Image 1) should be considered for all procedures. Violation of these borders may result in less-than-satisfactory aesthetic results. This is especially true of defects of the alar crease, where defects smaller than 1 cm may include the nasal ala, the alar crease, and the supraalar crease nasal dorsum. In fact, completing the resection of an aesthetic subunit and performing a total reconstruction to the border of adjacent subunits that allows for less noticeable scarring may be desirable.

When secondary intention healing results in unacceptable wound contraction and poor aesthetic results, reconstruction must be considered. Generally, secondary healing produces acceptable results when the wound is smaller than 1 cm in diameter, less than 4-5 mm in depth, and farther than 5-6 mm from the mobile alar margin. Specifically, the medial canthal portion of the nasal root and the alar groove heal well by secondary intention.

Considering the thickness of the skin is important in planning skin grafting. The thickness of the nasal tip averages 2400 μm, compared with a thickness of 1300 μm in the nasal dorsum. Therefore, submental, nasolabial, or preauricular donor sites are usually better fits for nasal tip cutaneous defects. Thinner postauricular grafts are ideal for superior nasal dorsal defects, although they may be appropriate in the nasal tip of some thin-skinned patients.



The nose is composed of 3 layers: the skin, the bony and cartilaginous framework, and the mucosal lining. The shape of the upper two thirds of the nose is created by the nasal bones, dorsal septum, and upper lateral cartilages. The tip of the nose is defined primarily by the lower lateral cartilages. The nose is broken down into natural concave and convex surfaces that become apparent as lighted ridges and shadowed valleys, defining underlying areas of cartilage and bone. A thorough understanding of these subunits is fundamental for creating a proper reconstructive plan for a nasal deformity.

As described by Burget, 5 of these subunits are convex: the tip, dorsum, columella, and paired ala-nostril sills. The paired sidewalls and the soft triangles make up the 4 concave subunits. When more than half of a subunit is involved, replacing the entire subunit to yield a better aesthetic result is more practical. Because a subunit flap takes on a concave (rather than a convex) form when it heals, subunits are also best used to repair the convex (but not the concave) unit areas. However, when flaps are not used, symmetry among all subunits should be considered because the natural shadows created by nasal contours determine the desired cosmetic result.

The nose is also broken down into the following skin-thickness zones:

  • Zone 1 covers the upper dorsum and sidewalls of the nose and is the most superior. Its skin is thin, smooth, and without sebaceous glands and rests easily over the underlying cartilage and bone.

  • Zone 2 begins approximately 1.5 cm above the supratip area of the skin and covers most of the nasal tip and alar lobules. It continues inferiorly halfway down the infratip lobule and to within 4 mm of the alar margin. The skin here is thick and has sebaceous glands. Underlying the skin is a layer of dense fat.

  • Zone 3 includes a small strip along the alar margin, the soft triangles, the lower half of the infratip lobule, and the columella. The skin is smooth, thin, and without sebaceous glands. In contrast to the skin of zone 1, the skin is relatively fixed to the deep cartilage and does not move easily.


The nasal anatomy clearly increases in complexity from the nasal root to the nasal tip. The superior nasal dorsum is composed of paired nasal bones with overlying skin that is thin, usually mobile, and readily reconstructed. Glabellar skin is a good source of extra skin when intrinsic nasal skin is inadequate for repair and skin grafting techniques are not desired. The middle nasal vault consists of skin whose thickness is similar to that of the upper nose that overlies the paired upper lateral cartilages.

Finally, the lower third of the nose consists of thick sebaceous skin relatively fixed to the underlying lower lateral cartilages. This makes reconstruction of lower third defects significantly more challenging than reconstruction of the remainder of the nasal framework. The 3-dimensional structure of the lower third of the nose also adds to the complexity of these reconstructions. Subunits of this area include the nasal tip, the paired nasal ala, the columella, and the paired soft tissue triangles. Precision in identification of and adherence to these separate units is critical in maintaining the natural shapes of the lower nose.



Generally, if a patient can tolerate the initial tumor excision, the patient can also tolerate the reconstructive procedure.

Absolute contraindications include poor general health (a failure to obtain preoperative clearance) and residual disease or uncertain surgical margins.

Relative contraindications include the following: 
  • Coagulopathy or blood-thinning medications 

  • Active smoking or tobacco use

  • Compromised vascular supply of the flap  

  • Chronic malnutrition

  • Systemic diseases that affects wound healing 

  • Previous surgical procedure  

  • Radiation therapy

If possible, relative contraindications should be addressed prior to surgery.



Lab Studies

  • If an extensive multistage repair is indicated, requiring general anesthesia, a typical preoperative workup of the patient may be necessary (if not already considered as part of another surgical procedure). This should include a CBC count, coagulation studies, electrocardiography (with appropriate clearance by internist or cardiologist). 

  • Patients who undergo repair with only local anesthesia may not require such an extensive workup.



Surgical therapy

Zone-Specific Defects

Zone 1, or upper nose defects

For superficial, smaller (<1.5 cm) defects of this area, small local flaps,  including the rhomboid flap, bilobed flap, glabellar flap, single transposition flap, or skin graft (eg, those harvested from the preauricular area) are good choices. For larger defects, a forehead flap can be used for both the dorsal and sidewall subunits. For the sidewall subunits, a superiorly based melolabial flap is also an option. 

Zone 2 defects, including defects of the nasal tip

These defects, even though they may involve small defects of the nasal tip, can be difficult to repair because of the prominence of the nasal tip. The skin of this area is difficult to match and skin grafts are likely only suitably obtained from the forehead and from the immediate adjacent area. The skin here is also nonpliable, so local flaps are not easily performed. Thus, suitable flaps include the bilobed flaps of Esser and Zitelli, which minimize the dog ears that appear with other types of local flaps and are good for defects up to 1.5 cm. Full-thickness grafts from the forehead can also match this area.

For defects larger than 1.5 cm, a local or regional flap is better suited to repair the defect. The best flaps for this zone include a paramedian forehead flap or a nasolabial flap for a defect in the alar lobule.

Zone 3 defects of the lower nose

For defects in the soft tissue triangles, simple granulation for wound healing may be the best option to avoid notching.

For superficial defects of the columella that may involve only skin, secondary intention or a full-thickness skin graft are options.

For defects that involve skin and some soft tissue or cartilage in the columella, the optimal replacement involves a composite graft. This can be harvested from the antihelix of the ear and trimmed to fit the defect.

For superficial defects of the ala smaller than 1 cm and centered on the alar groove, healing by secondary intention is the best option.

For defects that are mid alar, a full-thickness skin graft is the best option.

For defects greater than 1 cm, a bilobed flap, 2-stage melolabial flap, or nasofacial groove flap are good options.

For full-thickness alar margin or alar defects that are smaller than 1.5 cm, a composite graft can be harvested from the helix of the ear.

For larger defects in this area, reconstructive options include a nasolabial flap, a forehead flap, or a radial forearm free flap. The radial forearm flap is based off of the radial artery and vein and some soft tissue and can be used to reconstruct the nasal lining or perform a total reconstruction using multiple paddles.

Multiple-Zone Defects and Total Nasal Reconstruction




Aesthetic subunits of the nose: Nasal dorsum (blue), alar crease (green), nasal tip (red), soft triangle (yellow), columella (orange), and nasal ala (purple).

In some cases, multiple zones are involved or a total nasal reconstruction must be performed. Here, the options include a microvascular free flap (such as a groin flap, a radial forearm free flap, or a free flap from facial tissue), a paramedian forehead flap, or a delayed scalp flap. When the alar cartilages are involved, as mentioned above, cartilage may need to be harvested. Cartilage can be harvested from a multitude of sources, including the ears, the nasal septum, or the fifth to ninth costal cartilages. The harvested cartilage strips used in reconstruction are generally 5 mm wide. Also, bone grafts may be harvested and used to support the reconstructed nose. The cartilage is often placed more inferiorly than the original cartilage because the entire nose must be supported.

When a total or subtotal reconstruction is needed, not only must the outside skin and soft tissue be replaced, but the nasal lining must also be reconstructed. The nasal lining can be reconstructed with multiple and complex options, and these depend largely on the location of the defect. A bipedicled vestibular skin flap or a contralateral mucoperichondrial flap can be created to pass the septal mucoperichondrium to the defect on the opposite side. As a nasal lining reconstructive option, a skin graft can also be braced with cartilage to prevent the graft’s contraction. Also, Menick has modified the forehead flap by folding it on itself and creating a 2-stage operation to create a nasal lining. If the nasal lining is not properly formed, contraction of the tissue can lead to an inadequate result. Microvascular free flaps from the radial forearm, groin, and thigh can be used not only to reconstruct the lining but also to reconstruct more nasal tissue.
      
The radial forearm flap can generally be used to reconstruct nasal lining, but by using a 3-paddle approach, it can also be used in  a total reconstruction. In this case, one paddle acts as the nasal lining and the main nasal vault. A second paddle is used to repair the lip and the floor of the nose, and the third is the foundation of the columella. A full-thickness skin graft covers the anterior defect until the cartilage can be rebuilt over the lining.

The paramedian and midline forehead flaps are vertically oriented and have a rich vascular supply that can supply the cartilage and soft tissue associated with a nasal reconstruction. The paramedian forehead flap for nasal reconstruction is based on turning a paddle of forehead tissue down around a pedicle 1.1-1.5 cm wide, with the supratrochlear vessels serving as the vascular supply to the pedicle. The flap should be cut to size to repair the defect. The flap is then thinned 3 weeks after the original surgery. The pedicle is then divided after inadequate eyebrow separation is imminent (which can occur 2 wk after the intermediate surgery). Revision should be halted for at least 3-4 months for proper healing and wound contracture.

In all cases of reconstruction, and especially with the cases of subtotal and total reconstruction, extensive and meticulous planning is necessary. The reconstruction can often span multiple surgeries. The tissue must be built up sequentially from deep to superficial to properly reconstruct the nose. The flap must be properly designed to reconstruct subunits. A model to plan from and work on is key in these settings. Also, the contours should be sculpted to appropriately mold the soft tissue to achieve the best aesthetic result.  

Options for reconstruction across multiple subunits are as follows:

  • Groin flap


  • Radial forearm free flap


  • Paramedian forehead flap


  • Microvascular free flap

Options for total nasal reconstruction are as follows:


  • Bipedicled vestibular skin flap or a contralateral mucoperichondrial flap for nasal lining


  • Radial forearm flap


  • Paramedian flap


  • Microvascular free flaps

Preoperative details

Patients who seek nasal reconstruction are diverse and cross all age groups. However, in general, most patients who undergo extirpations of malignancies are  elderly, while trauma cases can involve both young and old patients. Older patients may have previously undergone a Mohs-type excision of a cancerous lesion or a more radical excision, meaning they may have less amounts of skin and soft tissue for adequate resection of a lesion.

Trauma, of course, affects all age groups, and even very young patients may need to undergo nasal reconstruction, especially after serious trauma. Thus, preoperative evaluation follows the guidelines of other operative planning. Patients with significant comorbidities may require a more extensive workup such as anesthesia evaluation and cardiac risk assessment. Blood thinners should be stopped preoperatively to prevent bleeding risks. Also, the risks of each procedure, including the risk of infection, bleeding, flap necrosis, and other wound problems, must be discussed with every operative candidate.

Preoperatively, these patients must be counseled on realistic expectations of the surgery and potential complications, especially wound complications and flap necrosis. If a microvascular free flap is performed, the flap must be monitored for signs of arterial occlusion and venous congestion. If not recognized and corrected as soon as possible, both of these events could be devastating to flap reconstruction. 

Nasal reconstruction procedures are performed under either local anesthesia or intravenous anesthesia. Factors that weigh in the decision include the size of the defect, the extent of required surgical reconstruction, the patient’s health, and the patient’s preference. The smallest defects of the nasal tip are often accompanied by the greatest levels of patient anxiety, and these procedures may be performed with intravenous sedation.

The most important aspect of preoperative preparation is counseling. A satisfied patient is one whose expectations are met or exceeded. If patients undergo reconstructive surgery with unrealistic expectations, satisfying them is almost impossible.

Preoperatively, patients are instructed to discontinue the use of blood thinners. Aspirin or aspirin-containing products should be discontinued for 2 weeks. For warfarin (Coumadin), 3 days is sufficient. Some of the newer antiplatelet agents are significantly stronger than aspirin and should be discontinued long enough before surgery to allow the patient's clotting abilities to normalize. Confirm any doubts as to patient compliance with appropriate coagulation studies.

Photodocumentation is critical in these patients. Postoperative visits should be accompanied by a review of the surgery and reconstruction. This serves to remind the patient of the extent of the problem. Standard nasal views, including frontal, lateral, and base views, are used.

Preoperative laboratory tests are age dependent. For local reconstructions, no preoperative laboratory workup is required. For sedation procedures, CBC count and urinalysis is obtained. In patients older than 40 years, ECG is obtained. In females of childbearing age, a pregnancy test is obtained.

For more extensive reconstructions, perioperative antibiotics are used. The authors prefer cephalexin in nonallergic patients. Doxycycline is used in patients who are allergic to penicillin. Antibiotics are continued for 3 days.

Postoperative details

Postoperatively, monitor for infection; after more extensive operations, perioperative antibiotics may be administered. Aggressively monitor for signs of infection and flap necrosis that may indicate partial or complete loss of the flap. Careful tissue handling and proper operative technique and planning are the best ways of preventing postoperative complications.

Bleeding is always a risk, and the patient should be made aware of the possible need for blood transfusion and its associated risks. Hematomas can also lead to improper healing and, at times, may need to be drained and require an operation. Prevention of smoking, control of medical problems such as diabetes, and proper wound care (eg, gentle wound cleaning) are all factors that patients can control to obtain a better operation result. The original defect, as well as the progression in wound healing, should be accurately recorded at all points so that the patient and physician can observe and monitor the success of the operation.

Follow-up

Follow-up reconstruction of the nose is typically performed at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Scar irregularities are treated with dermabrasion after a minimum of 6 weeks postoperatively. Flaps are thinned a minimum of 8 weeks postoperatively.



Risks, as with any surgical procedure, include operative site bleeding, hematoma formation, wound infection, and tissue necrosis. However, complications associated with nasal reconstruction are uncommon when appropriate flap design and techniques are used. Functional compromise of the alae should be addressed prior to flap or graft placement.

The risk of hemorrhagic complications such as bleeding and hematoma can be reduced with appropriate surgical technique and meticulous hemostasis. Cellulitis secondary to bacterial infection often results in partial loss of a flap. Although infection is uncommon, the empiric use of antibiotics that cover staphylococcal organisms may be indicated.

The surgeon must be aware of the patient’s previous history of radiation, trauma, or other surgical treatments directed at the nose that may lead to scar formation and interfere with blood supply, impair healing, or preclude a specific flap option. Certain systemic diseases (eg, diabetes) and environmental exposures (eg, smoking) can also impair healing and blood supply. Consequently, flap loss or necrosis may occur; this risk can be reduced through wide undermining that minimizes tension, appropriate suturing, and meticulous handling. Note, however, that a flap that is excessively large for the defect size may lead to a trapdoor deformity.

Skin grafts are extremely reliable in the presence of an adequately vascularized bed. If the defect depth is to the level of the perichondrium or periosteum, great care must be taken to ensure that the tissue does not desiccate between excision and reconstruction. Partial or total loss of the skin flap may be allowed to heal by secondary intention. In defects of the tip in which secondary healing is allowed prior to skin graft placement, healthy granulation tissue must be present as support.



Reconstruction of the nose can be complex because it requires restoration of function with often difficult aesthetic considerations. However, if the principles outlined above concerning cover, support, and lining are adhered to, excellent functional and aesthetics results can be achieved.

The patient should be informed that smaller procedures (dermabrasion, division and inset) may be necessary to correct the appearance of scars as part of the postoperative follow-up. During postoperative evaluations, alar integrity and airway patency should be assessed, and the patient should be reassured that final aesthetic results may take 12-24 months.

Note that a malignancy recurrence rate of 1.9% at an average of 39 months postextirpation has been reported.



This is an era of plastic surgery in which less is more. In virtually every arena of cosmetic and reconstructive surgery, the trend is toward more conservative and reliable procedures. Twenty years ago, respected authors were minimizing the use of skin grafting in the nose because of some more spectacular results that might be obtained with more aggressive procedures. Clearly, in most surgeons' hands, the procedure that can accomplish the task with the best chance of a good result while minimizing morbidity and potential complications is the one to choose.

Conversely, meticulous planning and execution of the forehead flap as popularized by Burget has expanded the realm of total nasal reconstructions. Although not a task to be undertaken by the casual reconstructive surgeon, the ability to reconstruct an entire nose as elegantly demonstrated by Burget has opened up this possibility to patients who used to be relegated to prosthetic placement. This reconstructive effort can be performed on a healthy stable patient who is willing to undergo the 12-18 months of reconstructive procedures often required to accomplish the desired result.



Media file 1:  Aesthetic subunits of the nose: Nasal dorsum (blue), alar crease (green), nasal tip (red), soft triangle (yellow), columella (orange), and nasal ala (purple).
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 2:  This image shows a 1.5-cm defect that involves the left medial canthus and nasal dorsum.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 3:  Medially based rotation flap repair of the defect in Image 2.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 4:  Postoperative frontal view of patient in Image 2.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 5:  Postoperative lateral view of patient in Image 2.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 6:  A large defect that involves the medial canthus, right infraorbit, right nasal dorsum, and right cheek. The infraorbital and medial canthal aspects of the defect were repaired with a full-thickness postauricular skin graft. The aesthetic unit borders were re-created using an advancement cheek flap and advancement nasal flap.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 7:  Postoperative view of the patient in Image 6. Color match between the skin graft and the surrounding skin is satisfactory. This is aided by confining the graft to defined aesthetic units.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 8:  Later postoperative view of the patient in Image 6 shows a medial canthal web that formed from late skin graft contraction. This was repaired with a Z-plasty.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 9:  A defect of the nasal dorsum, separate from the lower nose subunits. These defects are best repaired with local advancement of rotation flap techniques.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 10:  A rotation flap repair of the defect in Image 9. The flap is designed within the involved subunit of the nasal dorsum.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 11:  Postoperative frontal view of the patient in Image 9.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 12:  Upper dorsal defect that occupies a single aesthetic subunit.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 13:  Advancement flap reconstruction is used to correct an upper dorsal defect that occupies a single aesthetic subunit.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 14:  Early (3-mo) postoperative result of the patient in Image 12 that demonstrates normal symmetry and shape to the nose. Hyperemia of a dorsal scar is not unusual but gradually fades over 6-12 months.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 15:  A 1.3-cm defect of the left nasal tip down to exposed left lower lateral cartilage. This defect was allowed to granulate for 3 weeks followed by full-thickness postauricular skin graft.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 16:  This 3-month postoperative view of the patient in Image 15 shows good color and contour match. Alternatively, a bilobed flap could be used for reconstruction.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 17:  Lateral view of the patient from Image 15.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 18:  Cutaneous defect at the junction of the nasal tip and left nasal alar subunits. This defect was repaired following several weeks of secondary intention healing. A postauricular full-thickness skin graft was used. If the patient's lower nasal skin were thicker or more sebaceous, a submental graft would be preferred.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 19:  This early postoperative view of the patient in Image 18 shows a demarcation between the graft and the surrounding nasal skin.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 20:  This postoperative frontal view of the patient in Image 18 shows the maintenance of the 3-dimensional nasal integrity.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 21:  An early photograph of the patient in Image 18 following secondary dermabrasion of the skin graft. The contour blends in well with surrounding nasal structure. The temporary erythema may easily be camouflaged.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 22:  An older man is shown with an extensive cutaneous defect that involves the nasal tip, left nasal ala, nasal supratip, and nasal dorsum. Because of the patient's age, a conservative full-thickness skin graft was used after allowing some initial granulation tissue formation at the base of the wound.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 23:  Oblique postoperative view of the patient in Image 22. Full-thickness skin grafting provides an expeditious technique for healing large cutaneous defects of the lower nose. Alternatively, a staged paramedian forehead flap could be used.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 24:  A defect of the right nasal tip that measures 8 mm by 23 mm. This patient has thick sebaceous skin. In this patient, a full-thickness skin graft would likely provide inadequate color and depth match. A laterally based advancement flap of the nasal subunit was used.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 25:  The patient from Image 24 with a laterally based advancement flap in place.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 26:  This postoperative frontal view of the patient from Image 24 demonstrates maintenance of the 3-dimensional nasal integrity.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 27:  A postoperative lateral view of the patient in Image 24.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 28:  A small defect of the left nasal tip. This patient has thick sebaceous skin, making grafting techniques a less desirable option.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 29:  This image shows a rotation flap repair in place. Despite the small dimensions of the flap in relation to the size of the tip aesthetic unit, wide undermining is required to avoid distortion of the 3-dimensional framework.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 30:  A postoperative frontal view of the patient in Image 28 following flap and interval dermabrasion.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 31:  A right nasal tip defect down to the level of the lower lateral cartilage. This patient clearly has thick sebaceous lower nasal skin. Grafting techniques would not provide a satisfactory depth or color match.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 32:  This defect is repaired with a subcutaneous pedicled island flap based subcutaneously. This is a useful reconstructive option for lateral tip defects in which a skin graft is not considered a good option.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 33:  This postoperative photograph of the patient in Image 31 shows good healing and maintenance of the 3-dimensional integrity of the nasal framework.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 34:  This patient had a superiorly based nasolabial flap performed elsewhere to reconstruct a defect of the alar crease. The resulting pincushioning of the flap disturbs the intrinsic nasal symmetry and distorts the nasal framework.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 35:  The flap shown in Image 34 was excised and replaced with a full-thickness postauricular skin graft. Postoperatively, the curves of the alar crease were restored.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 36:  A large left nasal crease defect. Important features of this defect are that it involves the superior fold, the crease, and the nasal ala. It extends only several millimeters into the nasal ala and, therefore, should not affect the integrity of the rim itself. Note the smaller medial defect, which is repaired independently.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 37:  The patient from Image 36 is shown following repair of alar crease defect using full-thickness postauricular skin graft. This graft blends well in skin color and preserves the natural folds and symmetry of the alar crease. The smaller medial defect was closed using a rotation banner flap.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 38:  A left alar crease defect that does not encroach enough on the alar rim to cause concern about rim integrity.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 39:  Postoperative appearance of the patient in Image 38 following full thickness skin grafting of defect. Notice the maintenance of the normal curvatures of the alar crease.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 40:  This patient had 2 nasal defects. The first involved the left nasal tip and alar rim. The second defect involved the superior nasal tip. The superior defect was repaired immediately using a rotation flap. The inferior defect was allowed some second intention healing and was then repaired using a contralateral preauricular chondrocutaneous graft from the anterior helical rim.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 41:  The patient from Image 40 is shown following chondrocutaneous grafting to the left nasal tip and alar rim. The contralateral anterior superior rim provides a good color match and a good match for the contour of the rim.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 42:  Lateral view of the patient in Image 40 that demonstrates restoration of a natural curvature of the nasal ala following grafting.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 43:  Large defect involving a through-and-through excision of the left alar rim and the cutaneous involvement of the nasal tip.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 44:  Large defect involving a through-and-through excision of the left alar rim and the cutaneous involvement of the nasal tip.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 45:  A lateral view of the patient in Image 43.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 46:  Early postoperative view of the patient in Image 43 that shows the restoration of a normal alar contour following chondrocutaneous grafting from the contralateral anterior helical rim.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 47:  A lateral view of the patient in Images 43 and 44 shows restoration of the normal curvature of the alar rim following grafting.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 48:  A patient with a defect that involves the right nasal tip skin. The underlying lower lateral cartilage and vestibular lining is intact.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 49:  The patient from Image 47 is shown 2 weeks following excision of the remainder of the nasal tip subunit skin and replacement with right paramedian forehead flap. The donor site was closed primarily.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 50:  An early postoperative picture of the patient in Image 47 following division of the forehead flap and repair of the glabellar donor site base.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 51:  Late postoperative frontal view of the patient in Image 47 that demonstrates good color match and incorporation of flap into surrounding nasal skin.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 52:  A lateral view of the patient in Image 50.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 53:  Nasal defect that involves the right nasal tip, right lower nasal dorsum, right lower lateral and upper lateral cartilages, right nasal ala, and right nasal crease. A secondary defect of the right nasofacial groove is present.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 54:  The left paramedian forehead flap is in place. Note that the nasal tip subunit was not removed. Only 25% of the tip subunit was involved in the defect. Vestibular lining was supplied by a contralateral superiorly based septal mucoperichondrial flap. Septal cartilage was used to replace the missing lower and upper lateral cartilages. The donor site was closed primarily.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 55:  Postoperative view of the patient in Image 52 that demonstrates good color match and incorporation of forehead flap into surrounding nasal skin. The 3-dimensional nasal framework was restored as described in Image 53.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 56:  A postoperative lateral view of the patient in Image 52. Notice the lack of tip projection, which could have been prevented with a tip graft during the initial flap procedure.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type