Continually Updated Clinical Reference
 
 
  All Sources     eMedicine     Medscape     Drug Reference     MEDLINE
 
eMedicine - Facial Analysis for Skin Resurfacing : Article by

Quick Find
Authors & Editors
Introduction
Preoperative History
Isotretinoin And Radiation
Types Of Rhytides
Fitzpatrick Skin Type Classification
Classification Of Rhytidosis
Future Trends
Conclusion
Multimedia
References




Patient Education
Click here for patient education.



Author: Michael Mercandetti, MD, MBA, FACS, Consulting Staff, Department of Surgery, Doctors Hospital of Sarasota

Michael Mercandetti is a member of the following medical societies: American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, American Academy of Ophthalmology, American College of Surgeons, American Society for Laser Medicine and Surgery, American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Association of Military Surgeons of the US, and Sarasota County Medical Society

Coauthor(s): Adam J Cohen, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Ophthalmology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine; Consulting Staff and Partner, Myers Wyse Center for the Eye; Edward W Chang, MD, DDS, Director of Facial Plastic Surgery Education, Assistant Professor of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center

Editors: Paul S Nassif, MD, Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Southern California at Los Angeles, University of California at Los Angeles School of Medicine; Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine; Keith A LaFerriere, MD, Fellowship Director, Clinical Professor, Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, University of Missouri at Columbia; Christopher L Slack, MD, Otolaryngology-Facial Plastic Surgery, Private Practice, Associated Coastal ENT; Medical Director, Treasure Coast Sleep Disorders; Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA, Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine

Author and Editor Disclosure

Synonyms and related keywords: facial rhytidosis, facial wrinkles, facial analysis, preoperative analysis, preoperative laser resurfacing, nonablative laser resurfacing, ablative laser resurfacing, skin resurfacing, Fitzpatrick skin classification, types of rhytides

A comprehensive knowledge of laser systems, details and treatment parameters, appropriate patient selection, preoperative and postoperative care, and application of new technologies can produce aesthetic results that are satisfactory to both the patient and the surgeon. Before any intervention, a thorough facial analysis must be undertaken in order to promulgate an appropriate treatment plan.



With preoperative evaluations, surgeons seek to identify where potential contraindications to laser resurfacing may exist. As with any procedure, a detailed medical and dermatological history with emphasis on wound healing and scar formation is essential. In addition, obtaining a family history of abnormal wound healing, skin disorders, and ethnic background can facilitate an optimal outcome.

If the patient has a history of collagen vascular diseases (eg, lupus, scleroderma, keloid formation) or immunologic abnormalities such as vitiligo, laser treatment may need to be avoided because these conditions can cause problems with healing and can be relative contraindications to laser resurfacing.

The authors routinely request that patients complete a medical questionnaire and an aesthetic questionnaire to help identify prior or concomitant facial cosmetic treatments.



Ascertaining if the patient has used isotretinoin (Accutane) within 1 year before laser resurfacing is important. Some authors recommend discontinuation of isotretinoin for a minimum of 6 months before resurfacing with the erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser or the carbon dioxide laser. Others recommend waiting at least 1 year or longer. This concern stems from the effect isotretinoin has on the cells that repopulate the lasered skin surface.

The epithelial cells of the adnexal structures are a regenerative source for the re-epithelialization of lasered skin. Isotretinoin and radiation exposure destroy these adnexal structures. Facial radiation has been used in the past for the treatment of acne and thyroid gland enlargement.



Differentiation between static and dynamic wrinkles and the degree of rhytidosis must be ascertained and documented before laser resurfacing. Certain aesthetic scenarios require a combination of laser ablation and more invasive and traditional rejuvenative techniques to achieve adequate rhytide reduction. Face or midfacial lifting, forehead or brow elevation, and blepharoplasty may be coupled with resurfacing and tailored to the patient's needs. This combination of modalities may be performed together or in stages. Safety concerns do exist with traditional carbon dioxide laser resurfacing and full face lifting surgery. However, resurfacing can safely be performed in certain scenarios such as mini lifts.

Rhytides exacerbated by active facial muscle contraction are more impervious to laser resurfacing than static lines are (see Image 1). Crow's feet and lateral smile lines around the eyes are deepened with smiling and can be treated with some success, as evidenced by reduction in wrinkle depth. Botulinum toxin treatment before resurfacing can lessen the mimetic-induced lines and provide a more pleasing aesthetic outcome.



Evaluation of facial skin pigmentation before laser resurfacing is paramount to successful results. Pigment can be inherited ethnically or acquired as in melasma or Addison disease. A higher degree of preablative pigmentation increases the risk of hyperpigmentation and hypopigmentation (see Image 2) after laser resurfacing.

Hormonal changes during pregnancy can vary the amount of pigmentation, and performing resurfacing in women who are pregnant is contraindicated.

Fitzpatrick devised a description of skin types known as the Fitzpatrick skin type classification. This classification denotes 6 different skin types, skin color, and reaction to sun exposure.

  • Type I (very white or freckled) - Always burn
  • Type II (white) - Usually burn
  • Type III (white to olive) - Sometimes burn
  • Type IV (brown) - Rarely burn
  • Type V (dark brown) - Very rarely burn
  • Type VI (black) - Never burn

The higher the type and the degree of pigmentation, the greater the risk of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation. However, persons who have minimal pigmentation or light skin can develop prolonged postoperative erythema but are less likely to develop the pigmentary sequelae.

Pretreatment regimens with bleaching agents commonly are employed; however, in 1999, West and Alster reported that these pretreatment regimens may not be necessary.1 However, the standard hydroquinone-based bleaching agents are not without concerns and are not available in all countries.



Glogau developed the traditional rhytide/photoaging classification scheme that is used most often today.

  • Mild (age 28-35 years) - Little wrinkles, no keratosis, requires little or no makeup for coverage
  • Moderate (age 35-50 years) - Early wrinkling, sallow complexion with early actinic keratosis, requires little makeup
  • Advanced (age 50-60 years) - Persistent wrinkling, discoloration of the skin with telangiectasias and actinic keratosis, always wears makeup
  • Severe (age 65-70 years) - Severe wrinkling, photoaging, gravitational and dynamic forces affecting skin, actinic keratosis with or without cancer, wears makeup with poor coverage

Fitzpatrick reported an alternative classification system that is useful in assessing the degree of perioral and periorbital rhytidosis:

  • Class I - Fine wrinkles
  • Class II - Fine-to-moderately deep wrinkles and moderate number of wrinkle lines
  • Class III - Fine-to-deep wrinkles, numerous wrinkle lines, and redundant folds possibly present

Fitzpatrick also correlated these 3 classes with the following scoring system and degree of elastosis:

  • Class I (score 1-3) - Mild elastosis
  • Class II (score 4-6) - Moderate elastosis
  • Class III (score 7-9) - Severe elastosis

Mild elastosis is defined as fine textural changes with minimal skin lines. Moderate denotes a yellow discoloration of individual papules (papular elastosis). Severe describes marked confluent elastosis with thickened, multipapular, and yellowed skin.2



The newer nonablative lasers, such as the frequency-modified neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG), the broadband high-intensity pulsed light, and the flashlamp dye laser, have been reported to affect dermal collagen without resultant exfoliation. A noted benefit is the marked reduction in recuperative time, allowing patients to be treated and return to work within their lunch hour. Although none of the companies has reported equal efficacy with the carbon dioxide or Er:YAG lasers for the degree of rhytid reduction, these nonablative technologies have been shown to diminish rhytides to a variable degree.

Certain modalities have not stood the test of time. One technology incorporates the use of a radiofrequency system to tighten skin and reduce wrinkles with the deposition of new and remodeled collagen. Another combines radiofrequency with intense pulsed light and infrared laser. A more recent technology uses the concept of fractional laser resurfacing, allowing for treatment of all skin types.



Laser resurfacing, ablative and nonablative, is an adjunct in the antiaging treatment spectrum. These technologies can be used separately or in conjunction with other noninvasive and invasive treatments. Regardless of how these techniques are used, the recipient of them must be assessed carefully before treatment can begin.

The physician must ascertain the patient's expectations and render a critical and honest judgment as to whether these technologies can deliver the expected results. If the answer is no, or if the expectations are unrealistic, treatment should be deferred and other modalities considered, if applicable. Careful pretreatment analysis is an indisputable necessity in the evaluation and treatment of facial rhytidosis.



Media file 1:  Contraction of the frontalis muscle is responsible for the creation of the forehead rhytides depicted here. Laser resurfacing may soften these, but the mimetic muscles are better treated with botulinum toxin injections or forehead elevation and release of the frontalis muscle.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo

Media file 2:  The perioral pigmentation depicted here can worsen after laser resurfacing.
Click to see larger pictureClick to see detailView Full Size Image
Media type:  Photo



  1. West TB, Alster TS. Effect of pretreatment on the incidence of hyperpigmentation following cutaneous CO2 laser resurfacing. Dermatol Surg. Jan 1999;25(1):15-7. [Medline].
  2. Fitzpatrick RA. Facial resurfacing with the pulsed carbon dioxide laser. A review. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 1996;4(2):236.
  3. Alster TS, Doshi SN, Hopping SB. Combination surgical lifting with ablative laser skin resurfacing of facial skin:a retrospective analysis. Dermatol Surg. Sep 2004;30(9):1191-5. [Medline].
  4. Brackup AB. Combined cervicofacial rhytidectomy and laser skin resurfacing. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg. Jan 2002;18(1):24-39. [Medline].
  5. Brody HJ. Chemical Peeling. St Louis, Mo:. Mosby-Year Book;1992.
  6. Calder AJ, Young AW. Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression. Nat Rev Neurosci. Aug 2005;6(8):641-51. [Medline].
  7. Canton MD, Modolo E. Objective and subjective clinical effects of a Nd:YAG 532-nm frequency-doubled long-pulsed diode pumped laser system on photoaging of the face: a retrospective study on color signs, texture and rhytids. J Cosmet Laser Ther. Dec 2004;6(4):209-15. [Medline].
  8. Fitzpatrick TB. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol. Jun 1988;124(6):869-71. [Medline].
  9. Koch BB, Perkins SW. Simultaneous rhytidectomy and full-face carbon dioxide laser resurfacing: a caseseries and meta-analysis.Comment in: Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2002 Oct-Dec;4(4):234. Arch Facial Plast Surg. Oct-Dec 2002;4(4):227-33. [Medline].
  10. Manstein D, Herron GS, Sink RK, Tanner H, Anderson RR. Fractionalphotothermolysis: a new concept for cutaneous remodeling using microscopicpatterns of thermal injur. Lasers Surg Med. 2004;34:426-438.
  11. Mercandetti M, Cohen AJ. Complications of facial laser resurfacing. In: Brazzo B, ed. Pearls and Complications in Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery. 2001.
  12. Mercandetti, M. Laser-assisted blepharoplasty and laser resurfacing for the treatment of facial rhytids. In: Textbook of Ophthalmology. Waverly Co;2001.
  13. Nanni CA, Alster TS. Complications of cutaneous laser surgery. A review. Dermatol Surg. Feb 1998;24(2):209-19. [Medline].
  14. Walia S, Alster TS. Cutaneous CO2 laser resurfacing infection rate with and without prophylactic antibiotics. Dermatol Surg. Nov 1999;25(11):857-61. [Medline].
  15. West TB, Alster TS. Improvement of infraorbital hyperpigmentation following carbon dioxide laser resurfacing. Dermatol Surg. Jun 1998;24(6):615-6. [Medline].
  16. Zawar VP, Mhaskar ST. Exogenous ochronosis following hydroquinone for melasma. J Cosmet Dermatol. Dec 2004;3(4):234-6. [Medline].

Facial Analysis for Skin Resurfacing excerpt

Article Last Updated: Aug 14, 2007