Continually Updated Clinical Reference
 
 
  All Sources     eMedicine     Medscape     Drug Reference     MEDLINE
 
eMedicine - Wound Adhesives, 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate : Article by

Quick Find
Authors & Editors
Introduction
Use In Patients
References




Patient Education
Click here for patient education.


AUTHOR AND EDITOR INFORMATION

Section 1 of 4 Click here to go to the next section in this topic  

Author: Nathan D Schwade, PhD, Adjunct Associate Professor of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Deputy Associate Director (Acting) for Threat Reduction Directorate, Los Alamos National Laboratory

Nathan D Schwade is a member of the following medical societies: Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology

Editors: Anthony P Sclafani, MD, Director of Facial Plastic Surgery, The New York Eye and Ear Infirmary; Professor of Otolaryngology, New York Medical College; Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine; Dean Toriumi, MD, Department of Otolaryngology, Associate Professor, University of Illinois Medical Center; Christopher L Slack, MD, Otolaryngology-Facial Plastic Surgery, Private Practice, Associated Coastal ENT; Medical Director, Treasure Coast Sleep Disorders; Arlen D Meyers, MD, MBA, Professor, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine

Author and Editor Disclosure

Synonyms and related keywords: tissue glues, octyl-2 cyanoacrylate, butyl-2-cyanoacrylate, Dermabond, tissue adhesive, wound closure, cyanoacrylate, cyanoacrylate adhesive, adhesive, cyanoacrylates, alkyl cyanoacetate, wound management, wound



The cyanoacrylates were first synthesized in 1949 by Airdis. Coover et al described their adhesive properties and suggested their possible use for surgical adhesives.1 In the early 1960s, various surgical applications were investigated for these adhesives.

Cyanoacrylates can be synthesized by reacting formaldehyde with alkyl cyanoacetate to obtain a prepolymer that, by heating, is depolymerized into a liquid monomer. The monomer can then be modified by altering the alkoxycarbonyl (-COOR) group of the molecule to obtain compounds of different chain lengths. Upon application to living tissues (water or base), the monomer undergoes an exothermic hydroxylation reaction that results in polymerization of the adhesive. The shorter-chain derivatives tend to have a higher degree of tissue toxicity than the longer-chain derivatives do.

Inflammation, tissue necrosis, granulation formation, and wound breakdown can occur when cyanoacrylates are implanted subcutaneously. The process causing the histologic toxicity is thought to be related to the by-products of degradation, cyanoacetate, and formaldehyde. The local concentrations of these breakdown products are proportional to the rate of degradation (an aqueous degradation process) of the parent compound. Therefore, slower degradation rates result in less toxicity to the tissues. This is explained by the hypothetical possibility that slowly degrading compounds release degradation products more gradually, thereby permitting more effective clearance and invoking a less intense inflammatory response. The longer-chain compounds degrade much more slowly than the shorter-chain compounds, hence the lower reactivity of the longer-chain compounds.

Until recently, butyl-2-cyanoacrylate was the only commercially available cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive. Although butyl-2-cyanoacrylate is effective in closing superficial lacerations under low tension, it has several limitations. Several studies have shown wound-breaking strength in wounds repaired with butyl-2-cyanoacrylate to be equal to that in wounds repaired with sutures at 5-7 days; however, on day 1, breaking strength with the tissue adhesive is only approximately 10-15% of that in a wound sutured with 5-0 monofilament.

After polymerizing, the adhesive becomes brittle and is subject to fracturing when used in skin creases or long incisions. This restricts the use of adhesives to areas of low tension, thus limiting their use for incision repair. Butyl-2-cyanoacrylate has been used widely with good cosmetic outcomes for various plastic surgical procedures (eg, upper lid blepharoplasty, facial skin closure, scalp wound closure).

The polymer 2-octyl cyanoacrylate was formulated to correct some of the deficiencies of the shorter-chain cyanoacrylate derivatives. As an 8-carbon alkyl derivative, this polymer should be less reactive than the shorter-chain derivatives. The slower degradation of the octyl derivatives may result in lower concentrations of the cyanoacrylate polymer by-products in surrounding tissues, resulting in less inflammation. Additionally, plasticizers are added to produce a more pliable and tissue-compatible product that flexes with the skin and remains inherent for longer periods of time. The 3-dimensional breaking strength of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate is 3 times that of butyl-2-cyanoacrylate and is closer to that of a 5-0 monofilament suture. This stronger, flexible bond may allow its use on longer incisions.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved 2-octyl cyanoacrylate for closure of incised skin. In addition to its surgical adhesive indication, 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (Dermabond) was approved by the FDA in January 2001 for use as a barrier against common bacterial microbes including certain staphylococci, pseudomonads, and Escherichia coli.


USE IN PATIENTS

Section 3 of 4 Click here to go to the previous section in this topic Click here to go to the top of this page Click here to go to the next section in this topic  

Cost analysis has found that the use of tissue adhesives can significantly decrease health care costs and is preferred by patients. Adhesives also provide a needle-free method of wound closure, an important consideration because of blood-borne viruses. In addition, adhesives do not require local anesthetics. The cyanoacrylates function as waterproof occlusive dressings, have antimicrobial properties against gram-positive organisms, and may decrease infections. They have been demonstrated to decrease histologic and clinical infection rates in contaminated wounds when compared to closure with sutures. If the adhesives are used improperly and are implanted into the wound, they can cause a foreign-body reaction and actually may increase infection rates.

The following discussion is limited to 2-octyl cyanoacrylate. Moreover, this text is designed to be only a guideline; as always, physicians should use their own discretion in the use of these materials. Although tissue adhesives have many advantages, their successful incorporation into the physician's practice depends on understanding the indications, contraindications, and proper method of application. Without understanding these concepts, results are more likely to be unsatisfactory, and advantages of adhesives are more likely to be lost.

The adhesive can be used topically to close skin incisions and lacerations alone, or it can be used in conjunction with deep sutures. Generally, the octyl products can be used in place of nonabsorbable sutures for primary closure of skin incisions and lacerations on the face. For facial incisions and lacerations that are under tension and when closing incisions and lacerations on the extremities and torso, deep (subcutaneous) sutures are recommended.

The adhesive should not be used on the oral mucosa, hands, feet, or joints, where repetitive movement and washing may cause the adhesives to slough prematurely. Other types of wounds that are not optimal for cyanoacrylates are decubitus ulcers, stellate lacerations, animal or human bites, and nonsurgical puncture wounds. The adhesive does not replace the requirement for good quality wound care. Wounds still need careful examination and exploration with irrigation and debridement when appropriate. These types of wound preparations still may require local anesthetic.

In learning to apply tissue adhesives, the most important concept is that they are for topical closure only. Give special care to ensure the adhesive will not leak between the wound edges. If used properly, the adhesive acts as a strong bridge to hold the well-opposed wound edges together. If placed in the wound, it acts as a barrier to proper epithelialization and may slow healing. Once in the wound, the adhesive also has the potential to cause a foreign-body reaction and to increase the risk of infection.

Toriumi et al have published an excellent paper on the use of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate.2 They underscore 2 other important principles, the need to reduce skin tension at the site of the laceration and the need to ensure no dead space is present before sealing with the tissue adhesive. Singer (2004) has also published an excellent literature review on the adhesives.3

Deep dermal sutures (vertical mattress stitches) are used to bring the skin edges into everted apposition. The everted edges are extremely important to successful closure with tissue adhesives, since they prevent scar broadening and improve the cosmetic result. The everted skin apposition should be maintained with forceps or fingers during the application of the 2-octyl cyanoacrylate. For best results, a thin layer should be applied over the epidermis and allowed to dry for approximately 20-30 seconds. This method prevents pooling and running of the tissue adhesive, and it also provides a layer of protection from the heat generated by the exothermic polymerization. Subsequent layers of cyanoacrylate are then applied over the top of this initial layer.

Several clinical studies have shown that 2-octyl cyanoacrylate provides cosmetic results equal to those of sutures. Therefore, given the speed and efficacy of this new tissue adhesive, it should firmly establish itself in the treatment repertoire for closure of the skin. Future investigations with this product no doubt will expand its use.



  1. Coover HN, Joyner FB, Sheerer NH. Chemistry and performance of cyanoacrylate adhesive. In: Special Technical Papers. Vol 5. 1959:413-417.
  2. Toriumi DM, O'Grady K, Desai D, et al. Use of octyl-2-cyanoacrylate for skin closure in facial plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. Nov 1998;102(6):2209-19. [Medline].
  3. Singer AJ, McClain SA, Katz A. A porcine epistaxis model: hemostatic effects of octylcyanoacrylate. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. May 2004;130(5):553-7. [Medline].
  4. Ardis AE. US Patents No. 2467926 and 2467927. 1949.
  5. Blondeel PN, Murphy JW, Debrosse D, et al. Closure of long surgical incisions with a new formulation of 2-octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive versus commercially available methods. Am J Surg. Sep 2004;188(3):307-13. [Medline].
  6. Edlich RF, Prusak M, Panek P, et al. Studies in the management of the contaminated wound. 8. Assessment of tissue adhesives for repair of contaminated tissue. Am J Surg. Sep 1971;122(3):394-7. [Medline].
  7. Ellis DA, Shaikh A. The ideal tissue adhesive in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery. J Otolaryngol. Feb 1990;19(1):68-72. [Medline].
  8. Galil KA, Schofield ID, Wright GZ. Effect of n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (histoacryl blue) on the healing of skin wounds. J Can Dent Assoc. Jul 1984;50(7):565-9. [Medline].
  9. Kosko PI. Upper lid blepharoplasty: skin closure achieved with butyl-2-cyanoacrylate. Ophthalmic Surg. Jun 1981;12(6):424-5. [Medline].
  10. Laccourreye O, Cauchois R, EL Sharkawy L, et al. [Octylcyanoacrylate (Dermabond) for skin closure at the time of head and neck surgery: a longitudinal prospective study]. Ann Chir. Dec 2005;130(10):624-30. [Medline].
  11. Maw JL, Quinn JV, Wells GA, et al. A prospective comparison of octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive and suture for the closure of head and neck incisions. J Otolaryngol. Feb 1997;26(1):26-30. [Medline].
  12. Mertz PM, Davis SC, Cazzaniga AL, et al. Barrier and antibacterial properties of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate-derived wound treatment films. J Cutan Med Surg. Jan-Feb 2003;7(1):1-6. [Medline].
  13. Narang U. Cyanoacrylate medical adhesives--a new era Colgate ORABASE Soothe.N.Seal Liquid Protectant for canker sore relief. Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl. 2001;7-11; quiz 22. [Medline].
  14. Narang U, Mainwaring L, Spath G, et al. In-vitro analysis for microbial barrier properties of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate-derived wound treatment films. J Cutan Med Surg. Jan-Feb 2003;7(1):13-9. [Medline].
  15. Osmond MH, Klassen TP, Quinn JV. Economic comparison of a tissue adhesive and suturing in the repair of pediatric facial lacerations. J Pediatr. Jun 1995;126(6):892-5. [Medline].
  16. Perry LC. An evaluation of acute incisional strength with Traumaseal surgical tissue adhesive wound closure. Dimensional Analysis Systems Inc..
  17. Quinn J, Maw J, Ramotar K, et al. Octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive versus suture wound repair in a contaminated wound model. Surgery. Jul 1997;122(1):69-72. [Medline].
  18. Quinn J, Wells G, Sutcliffe T, et al. Tissue adhesive versus suture wound repair at 1 year: randomized clinical trial correlating early, 3-month, and 1-year cosmetic outcome. Ann Emerg Med. Dec 1998;32(6):645-9. [Medline].
  19. Quinn JV, Drzewiecki AE, Stiell IG, et al. Appearance scales to measure cosmetic outcomes of healed lacerations. Am J Emerg Med. Mar 1995;13(2):229-31. [Medline].
  20. Ronis ML, Harwick JD, Fung R, et al. Review of cyanoacrylate tissue glues with emphasis on their otorhinolaryngological applications. Laryngoscope. Feb 1984;94(2 Pt 1):210-3. [Medline].
  21. Singer AJ, Giordano P, Fitch JL, et al. Evaluation of a new high-viscosity octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive for laceration repair: a randomized, clinical trial. Acad Emerg Med. Oct 2003;10(10):1134-7. [Medline].
  22. Singer AJ, Nable M, Cameau P, et al. Evaluation of a new liquid occlusive dressing for excisional wounds. Wound Repair Regen. May-Jun 2003;11(3):181-7. [Medline].
  23. Singer AJ, Quinn JV, Clark RE, et al. Closure of lacerations and incisions with octylcyanoacrylate: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Surgery. Mar 2002;131(3):270-6. [Medline].
  24. Singer AJ, Thode HC Jr. A review of the literature on octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive. Am J Surg. Feb 2004;187(2):238-48. [Medline].
  25. Smyth GD, Kerr AG. Histoacryl (butyl cyanoacrylate) as an ossicular adhesive. J Laryngol Otol. Jun 1974;88(6):539-42. [Medline].
  26. Switzer EF, Dinsmore RC, North JH Jr. Subcuticular closure versus Dermabond: a prospective randomized trial. Am Surg. May 2003;69(5):434-6. [Medline].
  27. Toriumi DM, Raslan WF, Friedman M, et al. Histotoxicity of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesives. A comparative study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. May 1990;116(5):546-50. [Medline].
  28. Vinters HV, Galil KA, Lundie MJ, et al. The histotoxicity of cyanoacrylates. A selective review. Neuroradiology. 1985;27(4):279-91. [Medline].
  29. Yaron M, Erin MH, Huffer W, et al. Efficacy of tissue glue for laceration repair in an animal model. Acad Emerg Med. Apr 1995;2(4):259-63. [Medline].

Wound Adhesives, 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate excerpt

Article Last Updated: Sep 17, 2008