eMedicine's Hepatitis C Feature Series delivers the latest hepatitis C information.
Series 2, Issue 6 
Author Spotlight

Michael S. Bronze, MD, FIDSA, FACP
Professor and Chairman
Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Stewart Wolf Chair in Internal Medicine
Kerr-McGee Presidential Professor
Fellowship: Infectious Diseases Society of America; American College of Physicians


William M. Tierney, MD
Associate Professor of Medicine
Interim Chief, Gastroenterology
Director, Endoscopic Ultrasonography
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center


Syed M. Rizvi, MD
Fellow, Gastroenterology
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center


Supported by: AstraZeneca

Visit eMedicine's Hepatitis Resource Center!

Upcoming Conferences

Hepatitis Single Topic Conference: Controversies in the Mmgt of Pediatric Liver Disease: Hepatitis B, C, and NAFLD
Mar 3-4, 2006
Atlanta, GA

International Liver Congress
Mar 25-28, 2006
Shanghai-Hong Kong, China

12th International Symposium on Viral Hepatitis and Liver Disease
Jul 1-5, 2006
Paris, France

Guidelines

Diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatitis C

Screening for hepatitis C in adults: recommendation statement

Guidelines for laboratory testing and result reporting of antibody to hepatitis C virus

CME/CE Spotlight
Hepatitis C
Take Course

Hepatitis, Viral
Take Course

Ensure delivery by adding featureseries@email.emedicine.com to your address book.

HEPATITIS C: TRANSMISSION RISK, NATURAL HISTORY, AND PREVENTION

Epidemiology

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a significant healthcare problem, affecting more than 170 million people worldwide, or 3-4% of the world’s population. Prevalence of HCV in different geographic regions varies from 0.1-12%, with rates of 1.8% in the United States, 2.5-10% in South America and Africa, and more than 10% in Egypt and Bolivia. Worldwide, as many as 4 million new infections occur annually. In the United States, 65% of those infected with HCV are aged 30-49 years.

Risk factors for transmission include intravenous (ie, injection) and intranasal drug use, contaminated blood products, organ transplantation, long-term hemodialysis, and vertical transmission during pregnancy. Less common modes include nosocomial and sexual transmission. In the United States, most new HCV cases (approximately 36,000 annually, although underestimation is likely) are related primarily to injection drug use, while in less developed countries, contaminated injection therapy is frequently the source of transmission. Although the number of new cases in the United States is declining because of blood product screening, the long latency period from time of infection to clinical recognition portends a substantial clinical impact. By the year 2015, the prevalence of HCV-associated cirrhosis, decompensated liver disease requiring liver transplantation, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) will increase dramatically, making HCV a “silent epidemic.” HCV already accounts for approximately 8,000-10,000 deaths annually in the United States.

Of additional concern is the impact of HIV co-infection on the natural history of HCV infection, its transmission, and its response to treatment strategies. In the United States, an estimated 16% of patients with HCV are co-infected with HIV and nearly one third of HIV-positive individuals are also HCV positive. Most of those dually infected acquired HCV by injection drug use, although unprotected sexual activity between homosexual males is also a risk factor.

All known HCV isolates have been divided into 6 phylogenetically distinct groups known as clades, and more than 70 subtypes based on nucleotide sequences and genetic analysis have been identified. Epidemiologically and clinically, 11 genotypes have been identified (see Table 1). Genotype 1b is the most common genotype globally and is principally transmitted through contaminated blood products. The most common genotypes in the United States include 1a, 1b, and 3a, with 1a most often transmitted through injection drug use and accounting for nearly 70% of all infections. Genotypes 1a, 2a, 2b, and 3a are prevalent in Europe, and genotypes 6-11 are common in Southeast Asia and Indonesia. Typically, the genotype, or clade, does not regularly predict clinical presentation, progression of liver disease, or incidence of HCC, but it does predict response to antiviral therapy.

Table 1. Epidemiology of the Major HCV Genotypes

HCV Genotype Geography Clinical Significance
1a United States, Northern Europe Most common genotype in the United States
1b Worldwide Often transmitted by transfusion;
may have a more aggressive clinical course than other genotypes and higher incidence of HCC; associated with recurrent hepatitis in patients with liver transplants
2a, 2b Europe, Japan, North America With genotype 3, excellent treatment responses
2c North Italy  
3a India, Europe, United States Associated with intravenous drug use; often associated with hepatic steatosis
6-11 Southeast Asia  

Data adapted from Hnatyszyn HJ; Antiviral Therapy 2005;10:1-11.

Transmission

Risk factors associated with HCV infection include injection drug use (or intranasal if using a blood-contaminated device), receipt of blood products (prior to 1990 in the United States), long-term hemodialysis, organ transplantation, receipt of a tattoo from an unsanitary facility, vertical transmission during pregnancy, and sexual or nosocomial exposure. Sexual transmission is relatively inefficient, and the risk of HCV following needle stick injury from contaminated needles ranges from 0-10% (average, 3%). Co-infection with HIV increases the sexual and vertical transmission rates of HCV. Intrafamily transmission is uncommon, and the risk of transmission from an infected patient to a healthcare worker is about 2-5%. Weaker associations include poverty, high-risk sexual behavior, divorce, and fewer than 12 years of formal education. With the advent of blood and blood product screening for all donors in the United States, the risk of acquiring HCV from transfusion is low (see Table 2). Screening all blood donors with antibody testing reduced the risk of acquiring HCV to an estimated 1 in 199,000 as compared to 1 in 144,000 for hepatitis B virus or 1 in 1,048,000 for HIV. Furthermore, the addition of nucleic acid testing to screening likely reduces the risk another 5- to 10-fold. Transmission risk also varies with age and geography.

Table 2. Risk of Acquiring Hepatitis C Virus Infection*
Route Risk of Acquiring
  Hepatitis C Hepatitis B HIV
Transfusion of blood product^ 1:199,000 1:144,000 1:1,048,000
Needle stick 3% 30% 0.3%

Data derived from Lauer G, Walker BD; N Engl J Med 2001;345:41-52 and Dodd RY; Int J Hematol 2004;80:301-305.
*Data apply to US only.
^Data are for all donors to the American Red Cross voluntary blood supply and do not reflect the use of nucleic acid testing (NAT) for detection of HCV or HIV. If NAT is applied, the risk of transfusion-associated HCV is 1:1,390,000 and 1:1,525,000 for HIV.

Clinical manifestations and natural history of HCV infection

HCV most commonly results in a chronic infection. Acute HCV infection is not commonly diagnosed because most patients are asymptomatic. The incubation period of symptomatic acute HCV ranges from 2-12 weeks, and clinical features include fatigue, malaise, right-sided abdominal pain, and nausea. Jaundice is uncommon, occurring in fewer than 25% of patients. Fulminant hepatitis is extremely rare.

Within 1-3 weeks after exposure, HCV RNA is detectable in the blood; however, only 50-70% of patients have anti-HCV antibodies detectable by enzyme immunoassay at the onset of their symptoms, whereas 90% are proven positive by week 12. As transaminases return to reference range levels, symptoms resolve, usually over several weeks. Spontaneous clearance of HCV does occur and is usually seen in those infected at a younger age, among women, and in those with certain human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotypes (HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQB1). Spontaneous clearance is uncommon if the viremia has persisted for more than 6 months. Also, evidence suggests that treatment of acute HCV infection with interferon-α2b or pegylated interferons prevents progression to chronic infection.

Studies suggest that up to 85% of individuals with HCV develop a chronic infection, defined as viremia and/or abnormal levels of hepatic transaminases persisting longer than 6 months. Patients with chronic infection are usually asymptomatic or have nonspecific symptoms such as fatigue, anorexia, or weight loss. Symptoms do not accurately predict the extent of liver disease. Most infections lead to chronic hepatitis and some degree of hepatic fibrosis; furthermore, 20-30% of infected adults develop progressive fibrosis over time that leads to cirrhosis. This development is less common in infected children. Risk factors for developing progressive fibrosis include older age at time of infection, male sex, use of alcohol, and co-infection with either chronic hepatitis B virus or HIV. Other factors may include hepatic steatosis and iron overload and use of hepatotoxins. The rate of progressive hepatic fibrosis is also higher in patients with persistently abnormal hepatic transaminase levels. African Americans appear to have a lower risk of advanced disease; however, they also have a lower response rate to available therapies.

Life-threatening complications and death usually occur in patients with cirrhosis. The lifetime risk of developing cirrhosis is approximately 15-20%. After the development of cirrhosis, HCC occurs at a rate of 0-3% per year, and HCV accounts for nearly one third of all HCC cases in the United States. The risk of developing HCC is 25 times higher in patients who are infected with HCV as compared to those who are not. Currently, end-stage liver disease due to HCV accounts for most liver transplants in the United States. Even in the absence of significant liver disease, chronic HCV has been shown to have a negative impact on health-related quality of life scores.

HCV infection accounts for 8,000-10,000 deaths annually in the United States. Predictors of death from liver failure, the development of HCC, or the need for liver transplantation include a history of hepatic decompensation (ie, ascites, jaundice, hepatic encephalopathy, variceal bleeding) or serum albumin levels less than 4.1 mg/dL.

Impact of HCV infection on the liver

Since hepatic transaminases do not reliably predict the extent of hepatic injury, liver biopsy has been used to determine the inflammatory activity and the degree of fibrosis and, hence, disease prognosis. Key histologic features of chronic HCV infection include 1) patchy enlargement of the portal tracts with a predominant lymphocytic infiltrate, lymphoid aggregates, and piecemeal necrosis into adjacent lobules; 2) variable bile duct damage and loss; 3) varying degrees of microvesicular and macrovesicular steatosis; and 4) sinusoidal cell hyperplasia. Less commonly observed findings include lobular necrosis, hepatic cell dysplasia, multinucleation, and accumulation of Mallory-like bodies in hepatocytes. Definitive tissue diagnosis is based on the identification of viral RNA from tissue homogenates by polymerase chain reaction, although this is rarely used in clinical practice.

Several disease activity and fibrosis scoring systems (eg, Ishak, Knodell, Scheuer, Metavir and Batts, Ludwig) are used by pathologists, although no schema is universally considered most reliable. The extent of fibrosis and inflammation observed on liver biopsy can predict the progression of HCV to cirrhosis and can aid in the decision to treat (see Hepatitis C Feature Series 2, Issue 5). The risk of cirrhosis increases over time when the liver biopsy demonstrates significant periportal inflammation, bridging fibrosis, or both. By univariate analysis, several factors influence the progression of fibrosis. These factors include alcohol consumption of more than 50 g/d, male sex, age at infection, a serum ferritin level of 290 ng/mL or higher, and hepatic steatosis. Multiple regression analysis indicates that steatosis and periportal activity correlate with severe fibrosis.

Approximately 25-40% of patients with anti-HCV antibodies have transaminase levels within the reference range. In many of these patients, the HCV status is discovered incidentally during blood donation. Some patients have undetectable HCV RNA levels and therefore appear to have immunologically cleared their infection spontaneously, while others have active inflammation and possibly even cirrhosis. The reason for the latter observation is not clear, but it may be related to an association with HLA antigen DR13. Patients with reference range transaminase levels have a lower incidence of advanced inflammation and fibrosis relative to those with elevated transaminase levels. In patients with reference range transaminase levels and minimal pathologic changes on biopsy, one option is to monitor the disease without providing specific treatment.

Prevention of HCV infection

To date, screening the general population for HCV infection has been controversial. The 2004 US Preventive Services Task Force does not recommend screening for HCV infection in asymptomatic adults. Although further studies are needed, screening populations at high risk, such as injection drug users and pregnant females, especially if they are infected with HIV, may be reasonable.

Currently, no licensed vaccine to prevent HCV infection exists. However, counseling individuals infected with HCV may help prevent spread of the disease. Patients who do not have serologic evidence of immunity to hepatitis A and B should be vaccinated, especially since infection with the hepatitis A virus in patients with chronic HCV may result in a more severe infection than in patients without HCV.

References

Afdhal NH. The Natural History of Hepatitis C. Semin in Liver Dis 2004;24:3-8.

Chou R, Clark EC, Helfand M. Screening for Hepatitis C Virus Infection: A Review of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:465-479.

Dodd RY. Current Safety of the Blood Supply in the United States. Int J Hematol 2004;80:301-305.

Dodig M, Tavill AS. Hepatitis C and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Coinfections. J Clin Gastroenterol 2001;33:367-374.

Flamm SL. Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection. JAMA 2003;289:2413-2417.

Fernandez-Rodriguez CM, Gutierrez ML, Serrano PL, et al. Factors Influencing the Rate of Fibrosis Progression in Chronic Hepatitis C. Dig Dis Sci 2004;49:1971-1976.

Geller SA. Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C. Clin Liver Dis 2002;6:317-334.

Hnatyzsyn HJ. Chronic Hepatitis C and Genotyping: The Clinical Significance of Determining HCV Genotypes. Antiviral Therapy 2005;10:1-11.

Lauer G, Walker BD. Hepatitis C Virus Infection. N Engl J Med 2001;345:41-52.

Marcellin P et al. Therapy of Hepatitis C: Patients with Normal Aminotransferase Levels. Hepatology 1997;26(supp 1)133S.

Matthews G, Bhagani S. The Epidemiology and Natural History of HIV/HBV and HIV/HCV Co-infections. J HIV Therapy 2003;8:77-84.

Mathurin P et al. Slow Progression rate of Fibrosis in Hepatitis C Virus Patients with Persistently Normal ALT Activity. Hepatology 1998;27:868.

Memon MI, Memon MA. Hepatitis C: An Epidemiological Review. J Viral Hepat 2002;9:84-100.

Rozario R, Ramakrishna B. Histopathological Study of Chronic Hepatitis B and C: A Comparison of Two Scoring Systems. J Hepatol 2003;38:223-229.

Rockstroh JK, Spengeler U. HIV and Hepatitis C Virus Co-infection. Lancet Infect Dis 2004;4:437-444.

Sempoux C, Rahier, J. Histological Scoring of Chronic Hepatitis. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2004;67:290-293.

Thomas DL. Hepatitis C. Epidemiologic Quandaries. Clin Liver Dis 2001 Nov; 5(4):955-68.

Thomson JR, Finch RG. Hepatitis C Virus Infection. Clin Microbiol Infect 2005;11:86-94.

Yen T, Keeffe EB, Ahmed A. The Epidemiology of Hepatitis C Virus Infection. J Clin Gastroenterol 2003;36:47-53.


About us | Privacy Policy | Code of Ethics

eMedicine Home: Go to http://www.eMedicine.com.
Copyright 2005 by eMedicine.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
eMedicine.com, Inc., 8420 West Dodge, Suite 402, Omaha, NE 68114
402-341-3222