AUTHOR AND EDITOR INFORMATION

Section 1 of 10  

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction and Mechanism for Hair Removal With Light
• Terminology and Histology
• Different Hair Removal Techniques
• Treatment Guidelines
• Adverse Effects
• Safety
• Patient Expectations and Outcome
• Ethnic Considerations and Conclusions
• References

INTRODUCTION AND MECHANISM FOR HAIR REMOVAL WITH LIGHT

Section 2 of 10  

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction and Mechanism for Hair Removal With Light
• Terminology and Histology
• Different Hair Removal Techniques
• Treatment Guidelines
• Adverse Effects
• Safety
• Patient Expectations and Outcome
• Ethnic Considerations and Conclusions
• References

Introduction

The need for a rapid, noninvasive method for hair removal has led to the development of various light sources for hair removal. These include ruby, alexandrite, diode, and Nd:YAG lasers and intense pulsed light sources. These devices target either an endogenous chromophore (eg, melanin) or an exogenous chromophore (eg, carbon suspension, photosensitizer, exogenous dye). This article discusses the basic principles of laser hair removal, examines the attributes of specific laser systems, and focuses on patient selection and treatment protocols for the various systems designed to ensure safe and effective treatment.

Mechanisms for hair removal with light

Light can destroy hair follicles by thermal (due to local heating), mechanical (due to shock waves or violent cavitation), or photochemical (due to generation of toxic mediators like singlet oxygen or free radicals) mechanisms. Hair removal has been attempted using each of these 3 means.

Photothermal destruction

Lasers and noncoherent light sources have recently been introduced to induce selective damage to hair follicles. The mechanisms by which these systems induce selective damage to hair follicles are based on the principles of selective photothermolysis. This principle predicts that selective thermal damage of a pigmented target structure will result when sufficient fluence at a wavelength, preferentially absorbed by the target, is delivered during a time equal to or less than the thermal relaxation time of the target.

In the visible to near-infrared region, melanin is the natural chromophore for targeting hair follicles. Lasers or light sources that operate in the red or near-infrared wavelength region (694-nm ruby laser, 755-nm alexandrite laser, 800-nm diode laser, 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser, and noncoherent light sources with cut-off filters) all lie in an optical window of the spectrum in which selective absorption by melanin is combined with deep penetration into the dermis. Therefore, deep and selective heating of the hair shaft, the hair follicle epithelium, and the heavily pigmented matrix is possible in the 600- to 1100-nm region. However, melanin in the epidermis presents a competing site for absorption. Selective cooling of the epidermis has been shown to minimize epidermal injury. Cooling can be achieved by various means, including ice, a cooled gel layer, a cooled glass chamber or sapphire window, a pulsed cryogen spray, or cooled airflow.

Laser pulse width also appears to play an important role, as suggested by the thermal transfer theory. Thermal conduction from the melanin-rich shaft and matrix heats surrounding follicular structures. To obtain spatial confinement of thermal damage, the pulse duration should be shorter or equal to the thermal relaxation time of the hair follicle. Thermal relaxation of human terminal hair follicles has never been measured, but it is estimated to be approximately 10-100 milliseconds, depending on size. Therefore, devices for hair removal have pulse durations in the millisecond domain region. The normal-mode 694-nm ruby, normal-mode 755-nm alexandrite, 800-nm pulsed diode lasers, long-pulsed Nd:YAG lasers, and filtered flashlamp technology all use this mechanism.

The concept of thermal damage time has recently been launched in the case of the hair follicle. The melanin-rich hair shaft and matrix cells occupy a relatively small volume, and propagation of the thermal damage front through the entire volume takes 3-20 times longer than the thermal relaxation time of the hair follicle. Super–long-pulse heating (>100 milliseconds) appears to allow for long-term hair removal.

Photomechanical destruction

Photomechanical destruction of hair has been attempted with very short nanosecond pulses by Q-switched 1064-nm Nd:YAG lasers, with and without carbon suspension; however, when these very short pulses are used to target hair follicles, extremely rapid heating of the chromophore (melanin) occurs. This generates photoacoustic shock waves that cause focal photomechanical disruption of the melanocytes but not complete follicular disruption. Therefore, the Q-switched Nd:YAG lasers are not likely to produce long-term hair removal. Consistent with this behavior, permanent hair loss has not been reported in humans after Q-switched laser treatments despite a decade of using Q-switched ruby and Nd:YAG lasers widely for tattoo removal.

Photochemical destruction of hair follicles

Photodynamic therapy is the use of light and a photosensitizer to produce therapeutic effects. Hair removal with topical aminolevulinic acid (ALA) has been reported in a pilot study. A mean hair loss of 40% was reported in 12 volunteer subjects after a single exposure to 630-nm light 3 hours after an application of 20% ALA to the skin. ALA is a precursor in porphyrin synthesis and is rapidly and selectively converted to protoporphyrin IX by cells derived from the epidermis and follicular epithelium.

Upon absorption of a photon, protoporphyrin IX efficiently crosses into an excited triplet state, which, in turn, generates singlet oxygen by collision with ground-state oxygen. Singlet oxygen is a potent oxidizer that damages cell membranes and protein. This is a so-called photodynamic reaction. A host of other porphyrins, chlorins, phthalocyanines, purpurins, and phenothiazine dyes can act as photodynamic agents and are under development as drugs for photodynamic therapy. ALA or one of these other drugs will likely prove useful for hair removal. This approach will potentially provide an effective means of treating nonpigmented hair.

TERMINOLOGY AND HISTOLOGY

Section 3 of 10  

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction and Mechanism for Hair Removal With Light
• Terminology and Histology
• Different Hair Removal Techniques
• Treatment Guidelines
• Adverse Effects
• Safety
• Patient Expectations and Outcome
• Ethnic Considerations and Conclusions
• References

Hair removal is a vague term that has recently been defined. Temporary hair reduction is defined as a delay in hair growth, which usually lasts 1-3 months, consistent with the induction of telogen. Permanent hair reduction refers to a significant reduction in the number of terminal hairs after a given treatment, which is stable for a period of time longer than the complete growth cycle of hair follicles at the given body site. It has recently been suggested to add another 6 months to this posttreatment observation time (ie, the time necessary for a damaged follicle to recover from the laser injury and reenter a normal growth cycle).

A distinction needs to be made between permanent and complete hair loss. Complete hair loss refers to a lack of regrowing hairs (ie, a significant reduction in the number of regrowing hairs to zero). Complete hair loss may be either temporary or permanent. Laser treatment usually produces complete but temporary hair loss for 1-3 months, followed by partial but permanent hair loss. Histological observations show damage predominantly in hair follicles with large, pigmented shafts, while hair follicles with small (<25 mm), hypopigmented shafts do not demonstrate any morphological change.

Immediately after laser treatment, the hair shaft shows fragmentation with focal rupture into the follicular epithelium and thermal damage to the surrounding follicular epithelium. The extent of thermal damage is dependent on the pulse width but retains confinement on the spatial scale of the follicle itself. One month later, most follicles are in telogen phase while others are being replaced by fibrosis and a foreign body giant cell reaction with phagocytosis of melanin. At 1 year, most follicles are replaced by miniaturized hair follicles (dominant mechanism), and some are replaced by a fibrotic remnant. Both of these histological findings produce permanent clinical reduction in hair.

DIFFERENT HAIR REMOVAL TECHNIQUES

Section 4 of 10  

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction and Mechanism for Hair Removal With Light
• Terminology and Histology
• Different Hair Removal Techniques
• Treatment Guidelines
• Adverse Effects
• Safety
• Patient Expectations and Outcome
• Ethnic Considerations and Conclusions
• References

Endogenous chromophores

Ruby lasers

Of the original 5 normal-mode, 694-nm ruby lasers, only 2 are still commercially available for hair removal (see Table in Ethnic Considerations and Conclusions). These include the RubyStar and the Sinon. Because of high melanin absorption at 694 nm, the ruby lasers are best indicated in light skinned (Fitzpatrick skin type I-III) individuals with dark hair.

The RubyStar (Aesculap-Meditec; Jena, Germany) and the Sinon ruby laser (Wavelight; Erlangen, Germany) are dual-mode ruby lasers. They can operate in the conventional Q-switched mode for the treatment of tattoos and pigmented lesions and at in the normal mode for hair removal. An integrated cooling device consisting of a cooled contact hand piece for the RubyStar or cold-air cooling for the Sinon precools the skin prior to laser pulse delivery.

Grossman et al initially reported selective injury to hair follicles by a long-pulse ruby laser. Thirteen patients with fair skin and dark hair were treated once on the thighs or back at fluences of 20-60 J/cm² with a spot size of 6 mm. Hair growth delay was induced for 1-3 months in all subjects at all fluences. At 1- to 2-year follow-up, 4 of 7 recalled patients had persistent hair loss, which was greatest in sites treated at the highest fluence. Additional studies with larger numbers of patients have confirmed that hair counts are reduced by approximately 30% after a single treatment with the ruby laser. The effects of multiple treatment sessions are additive; hair counts are reduced by approximately 60% after 3-4 treatment sessions.

Alexandrite lasers

Several long-pulsed alexandrite lasers (755 nm) are being used for hair removal. At this longer wavelength, the ratio of energy deposited in the dermis to the epidermis is greater because of a greater depth of penetration. The risk for epidermal damage in persons with darker skin types is therefore reduced. Five different alexandrite lasers are available (see Table in Ethnic Considerations and Conclusions). These include Apogee (Cynosure; Chelmsford, Mass), Epitouch Alex (Lumenis; Santa Clara, Calif), GentleLase (Candela; Wayland, Mass), Ultrawave II-III (Adept Medical; Rancho Santa Margarita, Calif), and Epicare (LightAge; Somerset, NJ).

The Apogee laser provides pulse durations between 5 and 40 milliseconds and fluences up to 50 J/cm². A cooling handpiece (SmartCool) allows a continuous flow of chilled air to the treatment area. Epitouch Alex has a rapid repetition rate (5 Hz) and a scanner that can cover a 40 x 40-mm² area within 6 seconds. GentleLase uses a dynamic cooling device to protect the epidermis. This dynamic cooling device uses short (5- to 100-millisecond) cryogen spurts, delivered on the skin surface through an electronically controlled solenoid valve; the quantity of cryogen delivered is proportional to the spurt duration. The liquid cryogen droplets strike the hot skin surface and undergo evaporation. Skin temperature is reduced as a result of supplying heat for vaporization.

This cooling method allows for fast and selective cooling of the epidermis. The UltraWave II-III offers the convenient combination of 755-nm and 1064-nm wavelengths in a single device and is well suited for removing unwanted hair in all skin types. The Epicare laser has a cold air cooling option and a SmartScreen software package that assists in record keeping, protocols, and even practice management.

Diode lasers (800 nm)

An extremely high-powered (2900 W) diode laser (LightSheer XC, formerly Coherent Medical, now Lumenis; Santa Clara, Calif) has been approved by the FDA for permanent hair reduction. Long-term results suggest that the pulsed, 800-nm diode laser is very effective for removal of dark, terminal hair. Permanent hair reduction can be obtained in 89% of patients. This laser operates at 800 nm, has pulse widths of 5-400 milliseconds, a 12 X 12-mm spot, a 2-Hz repetition rate, a fluence of 10-60 J/cm², and a patented contact cooling device (ChillTip). Because of the longer wavelength, the active cooling, and the longer pulse widths, darker skin types can be treated more safely.

Several other 800-nm diode lasers (Apex-800, Iridex, Mountain View, Calif; F1 diode laser, Opus Medical, Montreal, Canada; Mediostar, Asclepion-Meditec, Jena, Germany; SLP1000, Palomar, Burlington, Mass; EpiStar, Nidek, Gamagori, Japan) are available (see Table in Ethnic Considerations and Conclusions).

Q-switched Nd:YAG lasers (1064 nm)

A high-powered, 1064-nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser (MedLite IV; Hoya ConBio, Fremont, Calif) is also available for hair removal. It has a very short pulse duration in the nanosecond range, a 4-mm spot, a repetition rate of 10 Hz, and a fluence of up to 8-10 J/cm². The high repetition rate (10 Hz) delivers the laser pulses very rapidly; therefore, larger areas can be covered easily and operative time is significantly shortened. The longer wavelength (1064 nm) makes it useful for darker skin types. Although capable of inducing a growth delay, it appears to be ineffective for long-term hair removal.

Long-pulse Nd:YAG lasers

Several long-pulsed Nd:YAG lasers (1064-nm wavelength), which deliver pulses in the millisecond domain, are now available for laser hair removal treatment for all skin types (see Table in Ethnic Considerations and Conclusions). These lasers include Lyra or Gemini (Laserscope; San Jose, Calif), CoolGlide (Cutera; Brisbane, Canada), Ultrawave (Adept Medical; Rancho Santa Margarita, Calif), Profile (Sciton; Palo Alto, Calif), VascuLight (Lumenis; Santa Clara, Calif), SmartEpiII and Acclaim (Cynosure; Chelmsford, Mass), Athos (Quantel; Les Ulis Cedex, France), Dualis (Fotona; Ljubljana, Slovenia), Varia (CoolTouch; Roseville, Calif), Mydon (Wavelight; Erlangen, Germany), and GentleYAG (Candela; Wayland, Mass).

The long-pulsed Nd:YAG lasers have deeply penetrating 1064-nm wavelengths. The reduced melanin absorption at this wavelength necessitates the need for high fluences in order to adequately damage hair. However, the poor melanin absorption at this wavelength coupled with epidermal cooling makes the long-pulsed Nd:YAG a potentially safe laser treatment for darker skin types, up to VI. The Nd:YAG laser is also often used for treatment of pseudofolliculitis barbae, a skin condition commonly seen in persons with darker skin types.

Pulsed, noncoherent broadband light sources

For several years, intense pulsed, nonlaser light sources emitting noncoherent, multiwavelength light have also been used for hair removal (EpiLight, Lumenis, Santa Clara, Calif; Ellipse, Danish Dermatologic Development, Hørsholm, Denmark). By placing appropriate filters on the light source, wavelengths ranging from 590-1200 nm can be generated. Cut-off filters are used to eliminate short wavelengths so that only the longer, more deeply penetrating wavelengths are emitted. Pulse durations vary in the millisecond domain. A single or multiple pulse mode (2 to 5), with various pulse delay intervals, can be chosen. The wide choice of wavelengths, pulse durations, and delay intervals makes this device potentially effective for a wide range of skin types. The devices come with software that guides the operator in determining treatment parameters depending on the patient's skin type, hair color, and hair coarseness.

Some of the newest emerging hair removal technologies are the lower-price, small, pulsed light hair removal systems. These include the IPL Quantum HR (Lumenis; Santa Clara, Calif), ProLite (Alderm; Irvine, Calif), SpaTouch photoepilation system (Radiancy; Orangeburg, NY), PhotoLight (Cynosure; Chelmsford, Mass), Quadra Q4 (DermaMed USA; Lenni, Pa), SpectraPulse (Primary Technology; Tampa, Fla), and Estelux (Palomar; Burlington, Mass). These systems have been optimized for hair removal, with wavelengths preferentially absorbed by melanin, long pulse widths, and large spot sizes.

Recently, intense pulsed light systems have been developed that are combined with 1064-nm laser light (VascuLight, Lumenis, Santa Clara, Calif and Starlux, Palomar, Burlington, Mass). These devices should allow for treatment of a wide spectrum of hair and skin colors.

Electro-Optical Synergy technology

Electro-Optical Synergy (ELOS) technology uses the synergy between electrical (conducted radiofrequency) and optical (laser or light) energies. The electrical energy causes heat to be focused on the hair follicle and the bulge area while the optical energy heats mainly the hair shaft. When combined, a uniform temperature distribution across the hair shaft and the follicle should be obtained to achieve effective hair removal. Based on this ELOS technology, Syneron (Yokneam Illit, Israel) has developed a system (Aurora) that combines radiofrequency energy with intense pulsed light and is equipped with cooling. The use of the radiofrequency energy should also allow for treatment of all skin types because this form of energy is not absorbed by epidermal melanin.

Exogenous chromophore

Rather than targeting endogenous melanin, an exogenous chromophore can be introduced into the hair follicle and then irradiated with light of a wavelength that matches its absorption peak. This eliminates the problem of competition by epidermal melanin. The main problem is finding a reliable method for the chromophore to penetrate into all depths of the hair follicle.

Carbon suspension Q-switched Nd:YAG lasers

The so-called SoftLight technique (ThermoLase; London, England) uses a proprietary suspension of 10-mm diameter carbon particles, with a peak absorption in the near-infrared portion of the spectrum, in combination with a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser. The skin is irradiated with relatively low energies (2-3 J/cm²) of Q-switched Nd:YAG laser light (1064 nm, 10 Hz, 10-nanosecond pulse duration, 7-mm spot size); however, the short pulse duration of the laser used in the SoftLight technique limits the extent of follicular damage. This technique successfully induces a delay in hair growth, but it fails to produce long-lasting hair removal. A controlled study comparing laser treatment with and without the carbon suspension and with sites that were simply epilated using wax reported a significant delay in hair growth in all laser-treated sites. However, when compared with laser treatment alone, no added benefit was noted with carbon suspension.

Meladine

Meladine is a topical melanin–encased, phosphatidylcholine-based liposome solution which, when sprayed on the desired area, supposedly selectively deposits melanin directly into the hair follicle without staining surrounding skin. The proprietary liposome molecules are small enough to potentially penetrate the infundibulum. The result should be temporarily melanin-rich follicles, which would allow patients with lighter hair colors to benefit from laser hair removal.

Aminolevulinic acid

Photodynamic therapy involves the use of a photosensitizer and light to produce therapeutic effects. The mechanism of action is presumed to involve the generation of toxic reactive oxygen species, subsequent to the photochemical activation of the photosensitizer by light. The recent introduction of 5-ALA as a topical photosensitizer has opened up a variety of potential therapeutic options. Selective protoporphyrin IX synthesis in pilosebaceous units is a unique feature of ALA over other photosensitizers, and topical application circumvents the photosensitivity induced by systemic agents.

In a small pilot study of 12 subjects, 5-ALA was applied topically to hair-bearing skin. Test sites were irradiated 3 hours later with 630-nm light from an argon-pumped tunable dye laser. At 6 months following a single treatment, a dose-dependent decrease in hair regrowth was observed, with the greatest loss (40%) occurring in areas that received the highest doses of light (200 J/cm²).

Photodynamic therapy may be a useful approach for hair removal. Because photosensitizers tend to localize in the follicular epithelium, photochemical destruction of all hair follicles, no matter what hair color or growth cycle, could potentially be obtained. Long-term data and large-scale studies are needed to determine the safety and long-term efficacy of this modality.

TREATMENT GUIDELINES

Section 5 of 10  

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction and Mechanism for Hair Removal With Light
• Terminology and Histology
• Different Hair Removal Techniques
• Treatment Guidelines
• Adverse Effects
• Safety
• Patient Expectations and Outcome
• Ethnic Considerations and Conclusions
• References

Preoperative considerations

• Presence of conditions that may cause hypertrichosis: These may include hormonal, familial, drug-related, or tumor-related conditions.
• History of herpes simplex, especially perioral (for facial treatment)
• History of herpes genitalis (for pubic or inguinal treatment)
• History of keloids or hypertrophic scarring
• History of previous treatment modalities: Methods (eg, shaving, waxing, tweezing, depilatory creams, electrolysis, lasers), frequency, last treatment session, and response all should be considered.
• Present medications, eg, isotretinoin (Accutane) intake in the previous 6-12 months

Preoperative care 6 weeks before laser treatment

• Sunscreen: A broad-spectrum sunscreen is recommended, and sun avoidance must be practiced if hair removal is planned in exposed sites.
• Bleaching cream: A bleaching cream such as hydroquinone (Solaquin Forte) may be prescribed to patients with darker skin types or a recent suntan.
• Plucking, waxing, or electrolysis: The patient should avoid these activities. Research has shown greater hair loss at shaved versus epilated sites, suggesting that light absorption by the pigmented hair shaft itself plays an important role.
• Shaving and depilatory creams: These may be used up to the day before laser treatment. The patient is instructed to shave the area to be treated; however, the area must not be irritated. If the patient is uncomfortable with the idea of shaving the area, a depilatory cream can be used instead.
• Antivirals: The patient should start prophylactic antiviral medications (eg, acyclovir, valacyclovir, famciclovir) when indicated.
• Antibiotics: The patient should start oral antibiotics when indicated (eg, nasal, perianal skin).

Day of treatment

• Cleansing and makeup: The area to be treated should be clean and free of makeup or powder.
• Preprocedure anesthesia: If desired, a thick layer of a topical anesthetic cream (eg, Emla, ELA-Max, Topicaine) can be applied under occlusion (plastic wrap) for 30 minutes to 2 hours before the scheduled laser treatment.

Technique

The procedure for hair removal using all of the above devices can be summarized as follows:

• Skin preparation: Remove all anesthetic cream, makeup, or other skin creams or powders.
• Anesthesia: Although less sensitive areas (eg, back, legs, arms) can frequently be treated without anesthesia, topical anesthetic cream is generally used on more sensitive areas. When treating the upper lip, local or regional anesthesia with intralesional lidocaine may be required.
• Visibility: A treatment grid can be applied in order to provide the operator with an outline of the area to be irradiated. In the absence of a grid, careful attention must be given to prevent double laser pulsing and skipped areas. Visibility can also be increased by a polarized headlamp with a magnifying loupe (Seymour light).
• Treatment fluence: The ideal treatment parameters must be individualized for each patient; test sites can be placed at inconspicuous regions of the area to be treated. The fluence is carefully increased while observing the skin for signs of acute epidermal injury, such as whitening, blistering, ablation, or the Nikolsky sign (forced epidermal separation). In general, the treatment fluence should be at 75% of the Nikolsky threshold fluence.
• Technique: Nonoverlapping or minimally overlapping laser pulses are delivered with a predetermined spot size. The largest spot size and the highest tolerable fluence should be used in order to obtain the best results.
• Cooling of the epidermis
  • Cooling gel: If the device is not equipped with a cooling device, a thick layer of cooled clear gel is applied before delivery of the laser pulses.
  • Dynamic cooling: With the dynamic cooling device (GentleLase), short bursts of cryogen spurts (5-80 milliseconds) are delivered automatically on the skin surface prior to delivery of the laser pulse.
  • Contact cooling: The LightSheer uses a sapphire-cooled handpiece that is placed in direct contact with the skin. Prior to pulse delivery, the handpiece is pressed firmly against the skin. After delivery, the handpiece is picked up and placed firmly on an adjacent site, until the entire area is covered. The sapphire cooling tip should be wiped clean every 5-10 pulses to remove debris. Between patients, disinfection of the handpiece with a disinfectant solution (Virex II, Johnson & Johnson; New Brunswick, NY) is mandatory.
  • Cold airflow: The Apogee-40 laser uses a cooling handpiece (SmartCool) that allows a continuous flow of chilled air to the treatment area.
• Postoperative changes: The ideal immediate response of treated skin is vaporization of the hair shaft with no other apparent effect. After a few minutes, perifollicular edema and erythema should be evident. The intensity and duration of these tissue changes depend on the hair color and density. The fluence should be reduced if signs of epidermal damage develop.

Postoperative care

Ice packs reduce postoperative pain and minimize swelling. Analgesics are not usually required unless extensive areas are treated. Prophylactic courses of antibiotics or antivirals should be completed. Topical antibiotic ointment application twice daily is indicated if epidermal injury has occurred. Mild topical steroid creams may be prescribed to reduce swelling and erythema.

Avoid any trauma, such as picking or scratching of the area. Avoid sun exposure. Use sunscreen with a sun protection factor of 30. Makeup may be applied on the next day unless blistering or crusting has developed. Shedding of hair casts (especially on the face) may be seen; the damaged hair follicle is often shed during the first week after treatment. Patients should be reassured that this is not a sign of hair regrowth.

Treatment interval/subsequent treatments

Research has shown that laser hair removal requires the presence of a pigmented hair shaft. Therefore, retreatment can be performed as soon as regrowth appears. Regrowth is based on the natural cycle, which varies by anatomic location, but the average time is 6-8 weeks. Additional research regarding hair regrowth rates and hair cycles is currently being conducted.

ADVERSE EFFECTS

Section 6 of 10  

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction and Mechanism for Hair Removal With Light
• Terminology and Histology
• Different Hair Removal Techniques
• Treatment Guidelines
• Adverse Effects
• Safety
• Patient Expectations and Outcome
• Ethnic Considerations and Conclusions
• References

Laser hair removal is not a painless procedure. Most patients experience some discomfort during and immediately after treatment. One can use a topical or local anesthetic before performing the treatment.

Perifollicular erythema and edema are expected in all patients treated at the threshold fluence. The intensity and duration depend on hair color, hair density, and fluence. The reaction usually lasts 1-3 days.

Epidermal damage occurs if excessive fluence is used. It is also more common in patients with a tan.

Herpes simplex outbreaks are uncommon but may occur. In patients with a previous history of herpes simplex and in those receiving treatment to the perioral, pubic, or bikini area, the risk is increased.

The risk of bacterial infection is extremely low; however it may occur following epidermal damage.

Transient pigmentary changes (eg, hypopigmentation, hyperpigmentation) can be prevented if the ideal patient and treatment fluence are chosen. Dyspigmentation of skin is seen most often in patients with darker skin types or in patients with a recent tan.

Permanent pigmentary changes are unlikely except in dark-skinned individuals.

Scarring is unlikely except in cases of overaggressive treatment or postoperative infection.

Lightening of tattoos and loss of freckles or pigmented lesions is not uncommon. Patients should be aware of this possibility.

SAFETY

Section 7 of 10  

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction and Mechanism for Hair Removal With Light
• Terminology and Histology
• Different Hair Removal Techniques
• Treatment Guidelines
• Adverse Effects
• Safety
• Patient Expectations and Outcome
• Ethnic Considerations and Conclusions
• References

The systems are designed for strong absorption by melanin and deep tissue penetration. Therefore, they are capable of causing retinal injury. Proper eye protection must be worn by the patient and operating personnel. Treatment near or on the surface of an eye is not recommended. All other body sites can be treated safely.

Darkening of cosmetic tattoos (eg, eyeliner, lip liner, eyebrow) can occur with laser-assisted hair removal as a result a reaction of the laser light with iron and titanium oxide pigment. Therefore, patients with cosmetic tattoos should avoid treatment of these areas.

Contact cooling devices pose a small but real risk of infection. Between patients, disinfection of the handpiece with a disinfectant is mandatory.

Logic would suggest that all patients with a history of skin diseases known to show a Koebner phenomenon (eg, psoriasis vulgaris, vitiligo, lichen planus, Darier disease) should be informed about this possible adverse effect of treatment; clinically, this is rare.

Livedo reticularis, intense pruritus, and urticaria have been reported, including a case of intense swelling and erythema. The pathophysiology of these phenomena is not known. Management included topical corticosteroids, antihistamines, and discontinuance of treatment. Several cases of induction of hair growth following laser hair removal in young female patients with darker skin types have been reported. Two different phenomena have been observed: (1) either conversion of fine, vellus hair to dark, coarse, terminal hair at the site of treatment or (2) induction of growth of long, fine hairs in the immediate vicinity of the treatment area.

The plume generated by the vaporized hair shafts has a typical sulfur smell and, in large quantities, can be irritating to the respiratory tract. A smoke evacuator and good ventilation are recommended.

Electrical and fire hazards are minimal but should be noted.

PATIENT EXPECTATIONS AND OUTCOME

Section 8 of 10  

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction and Mechanism for Hair Removal With Light
• Terminology and Histology
• Different Hair Removal Techniques
• Treatment Guidelines
• Adverse Effects
• Safety
• Patient Expectations and Outcome
• Ethnic Considerations and Conclusions
• References

Expectations and goals can be very different for each patient (eg, temporary vs permanent, partial vs complete hair removal). All responses are clinically significant and may be separately desirable to different patients. Growth delay that provides a few months of hairless skin is far more reliable. All laser systems have been shown to temporarily reduce hair growth. It occurs for all hair colors (except white) and at any fluence. Blonde-, red-, or gray-haired patients are unlikely to experience a permanent reduction, but hair loss in these patients can be maintained by treatment at approximately 1- to 3-month intervals.

The effectiveness of permanent hair reduction is strongly correlated with hair color and fluence. Research has shown that in the ideal patient with fair skin and dark hair, the probability for long-term hair removal after a single treatment is approximately 80-89%, depending on the device used. A critical threshold fluence is also needed to obtain this effect. Long-term, controlled hair counts indicate an average of 20% hair loss with each treatment, indicating the need for multiple treatments to obtain complete hair removal. A long-term comparison of different lasers (eg, long-pulse ruby, alexandrite, diode) and light sources (eg, intense pulsed light) has indicated that effective long-term hair removal can be achieved with each of these systems.

Regrowing hairs are often thinner and lighter in color, as indicated by measurements of diameter and color of regrowing hairs. This also contributes to the overall cosmetic outcome because the clinical impression of hairiness is defined not only by the absolute number of hairs, but also by the color, length, and diameter of the hairs.

The number of treatments needed to obtain complete, permanent hair removal for different anatomical sites is unknown. Exceptionally, a patient can obtain long-term complete hair removal after a single treatment, while others may respond poorly for yet unknown reasons; however, most patients (80-89%) respond favorably.

ETHNIC CONSIDERATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS

Section 9 of 10  

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction and Mechanism for Hair Removal With Light
• Terminology and Histology
• Different Hair Removal Techniques
• Treatment Guidelines
• Adverse Effects
• Safety
• Patient Expectations and Outcome
• Ethnic Considerations and Conclusions
• References

Hair color

Temporary hair loss (1-3 mo) always occurs after laser treatment, regardless of hair color or device used. On the other hand, the ability to induce long-lasting hair reduction is strongly correlated with hair color and fluence. Patients with dark hair are mostly likely to obtain long-lasting hair removal, while blonde-, red-, gray-, or white-haired patients are unlikely to experience a permanent reduction. Hair loss in these patients can be maintained by re-treating at approximately 3-month intervals.

In order to treat patients with blond, gray, white, or red hair, an exogenous chromophore (eg, dyes, photosensitizers, carbon particles) and a wavelength that matches its absorption peak can be used. The main problem is reliable penetration of the chromophore into all depths of the hair follicle. The short pulse duration of the laser used in the SoftLight technique (carbon particles plus Q-switched Nd-YAG laser) also limits the extent of follicular damage. This technique successfully induces a delay in hair growth, but it fails to produce long-lasting hair removal.

Photodynamic therapy may be a useful approach for hair removal. Because photosensitizers tend to localize in the follicular epithelium, photochemical destruction of all hair follicles, regardless of hair color or growth cycle, could potentially be obtained. The technique does not require a laser light source, making it potentially less costly than laser treatment. Long-term data and large-scale studies are needed to determine the safety and long-term efficacy of this modality.

Skin color

The maximum tolerated fluence is determined by the epidermal pigmentation present. Fair-skinned patients with dark hair are most easily treated. While persons with dark skin types are not readily treated with any of the ruby lasers because of melanin interference, the alexandrite and diode lasers and the intense pulsed light sources, operating at longer wavelengths (near infrared) and longer pulse durations, have been shown to treat persons of darker skin types (Fitzpatrick skin phototype IV-V) more safely if combined with cooling devices.

A Q-switched Nd:YAG laser, with or without an external chromophore, has been shown to be very useful for the treatment of dark skin types but appears to be ineffective for permanent hair removal. The long-pulsed, 1064-nm Nd:YAG lasers developed more recently may be the safest way to treat patients with dark skin tones. For patients presenting with a tan, pretreatment with a bleaching agent, sunscreen, and sun avoidance for at least 6 weeks is recommended prior to laser treatment.

Conclusion

Laser and flashlamp technology now offer the potential for rapid, safe, and effective treatment of unwanted hair. An ever-increasing number of published studies have confirmed the long-term efficacy of laser and flashlamp treatment. The procedure is also very attractive because of its noninvasive nature, its ability to cover a large treatment area, and the speed of treatment. Recently, smaller and less expensive light-based devices have become available for self-treatment in a homelike environment following instructions and guidance provided by a physician. Studies showed that with adequate training and instruction, patients may administer self-treatments for hair removal with this small, light-based unit in a safe and effective manner.

Recent studies have shown that CW, laser systems that emit long laser pulses, could potentially lead to long-term hair removal after repeated treatments at low energy. This has stimulated the research to develop portable, light-based hair-removal devices that women can buy and use at home, rather than being required to visit a clinic for treatment. If research studies meet the regulatory requirements, product commercialization of these so-called laser-razors could potentially become a reality. One should remain cautious and observe how this technology evolves.

Lasers and Light Sources for Hair Removal

REFERENCES

Section 10 of 10

• Authors and Editors
• Introduction and Mechanism for Hair Removal With Light
• Terminology and Histology
• Different Hair Removal Techniques
• Treatment Guidelines
• Adverse Effects
• Safety
• Patient Expectations and Outcome
• Ethnic Considerations and Conclusions
• References

• Alster TS. Laser-assisted hair removal: recent advances in treating darker skin phototypes. Cosmetic Dermatol. (Sept) 2000;49-51.
• Alster TS, Bryan H, Williams CM. Long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser-assisted hair removal in pigmented skin: a clinical and histological evaluation. Arch Dermatol. Jul 2001;137(7):885-9. [Medline].
• Altshuler GB, Zenzie HH, Erofeev AV, et al. Contact cooling of the skin. Phys Med Biol. Apr 1999;44(4):1003-23. [Medline].
• Anderson RR. Laser-Tissue Interactions. In: Goldman MP, Fitzpatrick RE, eds. Cutaneous Laser Surgery: The Art and Science of Selective Photothermolysis. St Louis, Mo: Mosby-Year Book; 1994:. 1-18.
• Anderson RR, Dierickx CC, Altshuler G. Photon recycling: a new method of enhancing hair removal. Lasers Surg Med. 1999;11(suppl):190.
• Anderson RR, Parrish JA. Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation. Science. Apr 29 1983;220(4596):524-7. [Medline].
• Anderson RR, Parrish JA. The optics of human skin. J Invest Dermatol. Jul 1981;77(1):13-9. [Medline].
• Battle E, Suthamjariya K, Alora B. Very long-pulsed diode laser for hair removal on all skin types. Lasers Surg Med. 2000;12(suppl):85.
• Battle EF, Hobbs LM. Laser-assisted hair removal for darker skin types. Dermatol Ther. 2004;17(2):177-83. [Medline].
• Bouzari N, Nouri K, Tabatabai H, et al. The role of number of treatments in laser-assisted hair removal using a 755-nm alexandrite laser. J Drugs Dermatol. Sep-Oct 2005;4(5):573-8. [Medline].
• Bouzari N, Tabatabai H, Abbasi Z, et al. Laser hair removal: comparison of long-pulsed Nd:YAG, long-pulsed alexandrite, and long-pulsed diode lasers. Dermatol Surg. Apr 2004;30(4 Pt 1):498-502. [Medline].
• Campos V, Dierickx C, Alora B. Hair removal by a pulsed, ruby laser system (E2000) with a twin pulse mode and photon recycling. Lasers Surg Med. 2000;12(suppl):78.
• Campos VB, Dierickx CC, Farinelli WA, et al. Ruby laser hair removal: evaluation of long-term efficacy and side effects. Lasers Surg Med. 2000;26(2):177-85. [Medline].
• Chess C, Chess Q. Cool laser optics treatment of large telangiectasia of the lower extremities. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. Jan 1993;19(1):74-80. [Medline].
• Dierickx CC, Grossman MC, Farinelli WA. Comparison between a long pulsed ruby laser and a pulsed infrared laser system for hair removal. Lasers Surg Med. 1998;10(suppl):199.
• Dierickx CC, Grossman MC, Farinelli WA. Hair removal by a pulsed, infrared laser system. Lasers Surg Med. 1998;10(suppl):198.
• Dierickx CC, Grossman MC, Farinelli WA, Anderson RR. Permanent hair removal by normal-mode ruby laser. Arch Dermatol. Jul 1998;134(7):837-42. [Medline].
• Dierickx CC, Leszynski D, Farinelli WA. Mechanism for induction of temporary hair loss. Lasers Surg Med. 1999;11(suppl):60.
• Divaris DX, Kennedy JC, Pottier RH. Phototoxic damage to sebaceous glands and hair follicles of mice after systemic administration of 5-aminolevulinic acid correlates with localized protoporphyrin IX fluorescence. Am J Pathol. Apr 1990;136(4):891-7. [Medline].
• Eliezri YD. Fifteen month clinical trial of hair removal with Alexandrite laser. Lasers Surg Med. 1998;10(suppl):200.
• Finkel B, Eliezri YD, Waldman A, Slatkine M. Pulsed alexandrite laser technology for noninvasive hair removal. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 1997;15(5):225-9. [Medline].
• Gilchrest BA, Rosen S, Noe JM. Chilling port wine stains improves the response to argon laser therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. Feb 1982;69(2):278-83. [Medline].
• Goldberg D. Laser hair removal with a millisecond Q-switched Nd:YAG laser. Lasers Surg Med. 1999;11(suppl):88.
• Goldberg DJ, Littler CM, Wheeland RG. Topical suspension-assisted Q-switched Nd:YAG laser hair removal. Dermatol Surg. Sep 1997;23(9):741-5. [Medline].
• Grossman MC, Anderson RR. Long pulsed ruby laser hair removal. Lasers Surg Med. 1997;9(suppl):167.
• Grossman MC, Dierickx C, Farinelli W, et al. Damage to hair follicles by normal-mode ruby laser pulses. J Am Acad Dermatol. Dec 1996;35(6):889-94. [Medline].
• Grossman MC, Dierickx CC, Quintana A. Removal of excess body hair with a 800 nm pulsed diode laser. Lasers Surg Med. 1998;10:201.
• Grossman MC, Dwyer P, Wimberley J, Flotte TJ. PDT for hirsutism. Lasers Surg Med. 1995;7(suppl):44.
• Grossman MC, Lou WW, Geronemus RG. Long term comparison of different lasers and light sources for hair removal. Lasers Surg Med. 2000;12(suppl):89.
• Handrick C, Alster TS. Long-term clinical and histologic evaluation of laser-assisted hair removal: comparison of long-pulse diode and long-pulse alexandrite lasers. Lasers Surg Med. 2000;12(suppl):20.
• Henderson BW, Dougherty TJ. How does photodynamic therapy work?. Photochem Photobiol. Jan 1992;55(1):145-57. [Medline].
• Kennedy JC, Pottier RH. Endogenous protoporphyrin IX, a clinically useful photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy. J Photochem Photobiol B. Jul 30 1992;14(4):275-92. [Medline].
• Kennedy JC, Pottier RH, Pross DC. Photodynamic therapy with endogenous protoporphyrin IX: basic principles and present clinical experience. J Photochem Photobiol B. Jun 1990;6(1-2):143-8. [Medline].
• Kilmer SL, Chotzen V, Calkin J. Laser hair removal with the long-pulse 1064nm coolglide laser system. Lasers Surg Med. 2000;12:84.
• Kilmer SL, Chotzen VA. Q-switched Nd-YAG laser (1064 nm) hair removal without adjuvant topical preparation. Lasers Surg Med. 1997;9(suppl):145.
• Kilmer SL, Chotzen VA, Calkin J. Hair removal study comparing the Q-switched Nd-YAG and long pulse Ruby and Alexandrite lasers. Lasers Surg Med. 1998;10(suppl):203.
• Kontoes P, Vlachos S, Konstantinos M, et al. Hair induction after laser-assisted hair removal and its treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol. Jan 2006;54(1):64-7. [Medline].
• Kopera D. Hair reduction: 48 months of experience with 800nm diode laser. J Cosmet Laser Ther. Dec 2003;5(3-4):146-9. [Medline].
• Lapidoth M, Shafirstein G, Ben Amitai D, et al. Reticulate erythema following diode laser-assisted hair removal: a new side effect of a common procedure. J Am Acad Dermatol. Nov 2004;51(5):774-7. [Medline].
• Lask G, Elman M, Slatkine M, et al. Laser-assisted hair removal by selective photothermolysis. Preliminary results. Dermatol Surg. Sep 1997;23(9):737-9. [Medline].
• Liew SH. Laser hair removal: guidelines for management. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2002;3(2):107-15. [Medline].
• Lin DT, Dierickx CC, Campos VB. Reduction of regrowing hair shaft size and pigmentation after ruby and diode laser treatment. Lasers Surg Med. 1999;11(suppl):86.
• Manstein D, Dierickx CC, Koh W. Effects of very long pulses on human hair follicles. Lasers Surg Med. 2000;12(suppl):86.
• Nanni CA, Alster TS. A practical review of laser-assisted hair removal using the Q-switched Nd:YAG, long-pulsed ruby, and long-pulsed alexandrite lasers. Dermatol Surg. Dec 1998;24(12):1399-405; discussion 1405. [Medline].
• Nanni CA, Alster TS. Laser-assisted hair removal: side effects of Q-switched Nd:YAG, long-pulsed ruby, and alexandrite lasers. J Am Acad Dermatol. Aug 1999;41(2 Pt 1):165-71. [Medline].
• Nanni CA, Alster TS. Long-pulsed alexandrite laser-assisted hair removal at 5, 10, and 20 millisecond pulse durations. Lasers Surg Med. 1999;24(5):332-7. [Medline].
• Nanni CA, Alster TS. Optimizing treatment parameters for hair removal using a topical carbon- based solution and 1064-nm Q-switched neodymium:YAG laser energy. Arch Dermatol. Dec 1997;133(12):1546-9. [Medline].
• Narukar V, Miller HM, Seltzer R. The safety and efficacy of the long pulse Alexandrite laser for hair removal in various skin types. Lasers Surg Med. 1998;10(suppl):189.
• Nelson JS, Milner TE, Anvari B, et al. Dynamic epidermal cooling during pulsed laser treatment of port-wine stain. A new methodology with preliminary clinical evaluation. Arch Dermatol. Jun 1995;131(6):695-700. [Medline].
• Olsen EA. Methods of hair removal. J Am Acad Dermatol. Feb 1999;40(2 Pt 1):143-55; quiz 156-7. [Medline].
• Raff K, Landthaler M, Hohenleutner U, et al. Optimizing treatment parameters for hair removal using long-pulsed Nd:YAG-lasers. Lasers Med Sci. 2004;18(4):219-22. [Medline].
• Ross EV, Rathyen JS, Gaudet T. Recycling wasted photons: a device to increase laser energy used in surgery. Lasers Surg Med. 1996;8:87.
• Sadick N, Weiss B. A two year follow-up of hair removal utilizing the broad –spectrum flashlamp. Lasers Surg Med. 2000;12:88.
• Tanzi EL, Alster TS. Long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser-assisted hair removal in all skin types. Dermatol Surg. Jan 2004;30(1):13-7. [Medline].
• Troilius A, Troilius C. Long term follow-up of hair removal with a second generation of broad band spectrum intense pulsed light source. suppl. Lasers Surg Med. 2000;12:87.
• van Gemert MJ, Welch AJ. Time constants in thermal laser medicine. Lasers Surg Med. 1989;9(4):405-21. [Medline].
• Vittorio CC, Lehrer MS. Laser hair removal. Facial Plast Surg. Feb 2003;19(1):131-6. [Medline].
• Weishaupt KR, Gomer CJ, Dougherty TJ. Identification of singlet oxygen as the cytotoxic agent in photoinactivation of a murine tumor. Cancer Res. Jul 1976;36(7 PT 1):2326-9. [Medline].
• Weiss RA, Weiss MA, Marwaha S, Harrington AC. Hair removal with a non-coherent filtered flashlamp intense pulsed light source. Lasers Surg Med. 1999;24(2):128-32. [Medline].

Article Last Updated: Apr 12, 2006