You are in: eMedicine Specialties > Orthopedic Surgery > Knee
|
Fibular Hemimelia Last Updated: January 27, 2004 |
|
| Synonyms and related keywords: postaxial hypoplasia of the lower extremity, fibular hypoplasia, fibular aplasia, fibular abnormality, limb-length discrepancy, postaxial hypoplasia of the lower extremity
|
|   |
AUTHOR INFORMATION
| Section 1 of 11  |
|
| Author: Michael C Holmstrom, MD, Consulting Surgeon, Department of Orthopedics, The Orthopedic Specialty Hospital (TOSH) Coauthor(s): Peter M Stevens, MD, Professor, Director of Pediatric Orthopedic Fellowship Program, Department of Orthopedics, University of Utah School of Medicine |
| Michael C Holmstrom, MD, is a member of the following medical societies:
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons,
American Medical Association,
Arthroscopy Association of North America,
Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, and
Utah Medical Association |
| Editor(s): Dennis P Grogan, MD, Clinical Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of South Florida College of Medicine; Chief of Staff, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shriners Hospital for Children of Tampa; Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD, Senior Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine;
Thomas M DeBerardino, MD, Director, John A Feagin, Jr Sports Medicine Fellowship at West Point, Clinical Instructor in Surgery, Orthopedic Surgery Service, Keller Army Community Hospital at West Point;
Dinesh Patel, MD, FACS, Associate Clinical Professor of Orthopedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School; Chief of Arthroscopic Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital;
and Carlos J Lavernia, MD, FAAOS, Adjunct Clinical Professor, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine; Medical Director, Orthopedic Institute at Mercy Hospital |
Disclosure
|   |
INTRODUCTION
| Section 2 of 11  |
|
Fibular hemimelia is a condition that was initially described as being related to aplasia or hypoplasia of the fibula. Coventry and Johnson, and later by Achterman and Kalamchi, provided early classification systems. These are primarily defined by and concerned with treatment of the accompanying limb-length discrepancy.
A constellation of lower-extremity features accompanies fibular hemimelia. These should be evaluated and treated when appropriate. The association of these features has led to a recent recommendation that the name postaxial hypoplasia of the lower extremity may be more appropriate and a better description of the entire pattern of abnormalities seen with this syndrome. History of the Procedure: Historically, the recommended initial treatment for postaxial hypoplasia involved amputation, but only as a last resort. However, Herring et al (1986) showed that patients who underwent amputation after several failed attempts at salvage were at high risk for emotional problems. Therefore, trying to determine which patients may fare better with immediate amputation is important. Generally, these are patients with a nonfunctional foot or a limb-length discrepancy of more than 20-30%.
Then, the issue of establishing the criteria for determining the indications for amputation arose. The first recommendations used a projected limb-length discrepancy of 3 inches at maturity as an appropriate cutoff. However, as limb-lengthening techniques have improved, this length has increased, and limb salvage is more often regarded as a feasible option. Other features related to postaxial hypoplasia have also been investigated, and treatments have been defined. Problem: As is evidenced by its historic name, a primary feature of fibular hemimelia is the fibular abnormality. This may range from a minimal shortening of the fibula to its complete absence. See Clinical for other related features. Frequency: Postaxial hypoplasia of the lower extremity is rare, and when it does occur, it has variable penetrance ranging from mild deformity (which the patient may never notice) to severe deformity. Etiology: Although a number of putative causes exist, some have recently postulated that interference with limb-bud development plays an important role in postaxial hypoplasia of the lower extremity. Widespread pathology throughout the limb has been noted, even in mild cases of fibular deficiency. During the fetal period, the fibular field of the limb bud controls development of the proximal femur, explaining the frequent association of femoral abnormalities. The remaining associated abnormalities around the knee, leg, ankle, and foot also are related to the fibular field of the lower limb bud. Therefore, postaxial hypoplasia of the lower extremity is a descriptive term for the constellation of abnormalities present.Pathophysiology: See Etiology.
Clinical: Presentations can vary widely, ranging from what appears to be merely an absent fifth toe in a newborn or a minimal difference in limb lengths to severe fibular deformities that are immediately apparent. The clinician must also look for any associated abnormalities, including problems with alignment and stability, and he or she must realize that the clinical picture may evolve with continued growth and development.
Associated aspects of the clinical presentation may include the following:
- Fibular abnormality, ranging from minimal shortening to complete absence of the fibula
- Proximal femoral focal deficiency (PFFD)
- Coxa vara
- Femoral hypoplasia with external rotation
- Lateral patella subluxation
- Hypoplastic lateral femoral condyle
- Genu valgus with lateral mechanical axis displacement
- Flattened tibial eminence with absent cruciate and a positive Lachman sign
- Short and/or bowed tibia
- Ankle valgus
- Ball-and-socket ankle
- Absent tarsal bones
- Tarsal coalitions
- Absent foot rays
|   |
INDICATIONS
| Section 3 of 11  |
|
Evaluate the entire limb in patients presenting with postaxial hypoplasia of the lower extremity, specifically examining for all of the previously mentioned clinical features. This is important and helpful for developing a plan for future treatment, both to guide the physician's treatment decisions and to inform the family of what they might expect in the future.
The ultimate goal is to achieve adequate lower-extremity alignment, length, and stability to enable the child to achieve maximal function. If this is not possible, the goal is an appropriately timed amputation to allow the child's development with the use of a functional prosthesis. When the various alternatives are discussed, the goals and expectations must be realistic. As a part of this discussion, the social and psychological state of the child and that of his or her family must be evaluated, especially if multiple surgeries and lengthening procedures are planned.
|   |
RELEVANT ANATOMY AND CONTRAINDICATIONS
| Section 4 of 11  |
|
Relevant Anatomy: No single anatomic feature fully characterizes fibular hemimelia. The condition is a constellation of features that are addressed individually to obtain optimal length, alignment, and function. Contraindications: As with any surgical procedure, the potential benefits must outweigh the risks. Although a number of abnormalities are related to postaxial hypoplasia of the lower extremity, limb-length discrepancy is one of the more difficult to address. If the difference is minimal or if it is large and present with a nonfunctional foot, the decision is relatively straightforward. However, in many situations, several relative contraindications to attempting limb-lengthening salvage operations may be present.
The recommendation for the maximum amount of attempted correction is 7.5-15 cm. Other relative contraindications include a nonfunctional foot, a limb that may have severe cosmetic problems, or a situation in which the patient may not be able to tolerate multiple surgeries over an extended period.
Each patient's situation is unique, however. Most patients and parents want the limb to be as normal as possible, and they may wish to undergo the long-term treatment necessary to achieve this goal despite some of these relative contraindications. |
|
Patient Education
|
|
Click here for patient education.
|
|
|
|
|
|   |
WORKUP
| Section 5 of 11  |
|
Imaging Studies:
- Judicious use of appropriate imaging studies is necessary to fully evaluate and treat postaxial hypoplasia of the lower extremity. Some of the more pertinent radiographic studies are listed below.
- A long-leg standing series shows the overall picture of the affected lower extremity and permits use of the contralateral side as a control. Limb-length discrepancies and alignment can be measured. Abnormalities involving specific parts of the lower extremity can be seen and, if necessary, imaged further with the use of specific views.
- A pelvis and/or hip series is useful in evaluating acetabular dysplasia, PFFD, and the location and amount of any varus deformity. Changing the rotation of the femur can sometimes help show version and varus/valgus deformity more clearly.
- A knee series is useful for evaluating distal femur valgus, hypoplasia of the lateral femoral condyle, and flattening of the tibial eminence. The patella may be small and/or high riding, and the femoral sulcus may be shallow.
- A tibia/fibula series provides information about the tibia. In several studies, a small percentage of patients showed anteromedial bowing of the tibia. This imaging series is also useful for classifying the disorder. The Achterman and Kalamchi classification system is based on fibular morphology as follows:
- Type IA: The proximal fibular epiphysis is distal to the level of the tibial growth plate with the distal fibular epiphysis proximal to the talar dome.
- Type IB: The proximal fibula is absent for 30-50% of its length. The distal fibula is present but does not adequately support the ankle.
- Type II: The fibula is completely absent.
- An ankle/foot series is useful for determining the ankle morphology, the fibular contribution to the mortise, the distal tibial epiphyseal morphology, the presence of tibiotalar valgus, the presence of a ball-and-socket ankle, the presence of a tarsal coalition, and the number of rays.
- The factors just described can be used to classify the fibular hemimelia by using the following system introduced by Stanitski and Stanitski:
- Fibula
- I - Nearly normal
- II - Small or miniature fibula, regardless of its position in the limb
- III - Complete absence of the fibula
- Tibiotalar joint and distal tibial epiphyseal morphology
- H - Horizontal
- V - Valgus (triangular distal tibial epiphysis)
- S - Spherical (ball and socket ankle)
- Presence of a tarsal coalition (denoted with a lowercase c)
- Number of foot rays, medial to lateral - Denoted 1-5
- A pattern type is constructed to describe the condition. For example, a patient with a hypoplastic fibula, a horizontal ankle, tarsal coalition, and a 5-ray foot is classified as having a type IIHc5 fibular hemimelia. This system should lead to better communication regarding this condition.
|   |
TREATMENT
| Section 6 of 11  |
|
Medical therapy: No specific medical therapies can correct the underlying abnormalities. However, for mild deformities, observation and/or nonoperative management may be useful.
As with limb-length discrepancies resulting from other causes, no treatment or the use of heel lifts may be adequate, particularly in discrepancies less than 2 cm. However, although the relative percentage of shortening generally remains constant at 10-20% relative to the contralateral side, the absolute discrepancy may be progressive with growth, and it must be followed up until skeletal maturity is achieved.
Similarly, observation may be adequate for hip varus, genu valgum, tibial kyphosis, and patellar instability. Although an absent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) with a positive Lachman test result is frequently observed, clinical signs of instability are rare, and nonoperative management is appropriate. In mild cases, ankle valgus may be managed with a University of California-Berkeley (UCB) orthosis, but as with limb-length discrepancy, the patient must be monitored through his or her continued growth because the fibular portion of the mortise may be progressively compromised. Surgical therapy: Several issues must be addressed before any procedure is performed for postaxial hypoplasia of the lower extremity. The ultimate goal is to achieve symmetrical, stable, and well-aligned joints with the minimal number of surgical procedures. No one set of operations should always be performed, but individual procedures addressing the specific abnormalities for each patient should be planned. Finally, realistic guidelines of what is involved regarding the timing, the duration of recovery, and the ultimate outcome must be communicated to the patient and to his or her family.
For limb-length discrepancy, Birch et al recommend amputation in patients with a nonfunctional foot, regardless of length, unless the upper extremities also are nonfunctional. In patients with a functional foot, the surgical procedure recommendations generally fall into 1 of the following 3 groups:
- The first group involves patients with a discrepancy less than 10%. There is little disagreement that these patients can benefit from lengthening procedures or contralateral epiphysiodesis.
- The second group for which there is little disagreement on the recommended treatment involves patients with a discrepancy more than 30%. Amputation is recommended for these patients.
- The third group, which involves patients a discrepancy of 10-30%, represents the greatest challenge. Lengthening more than 10 cm in a limb with associated knee, ankle, and foot abnormalities is difficult. At maturity, an average lower-extremity length is often 80-110 cm. A 10% discrepancy for this limb is 8-11 cm. Although parents have hopes for a normal limb as opposed to an amputated limb, they must be helped to understand the problems associated with lengthening in cases of severe deficiencies. Lengthening with a contralateral epiphysiodesis may also be considered as an alternative to multiple lengthening procedures.
If an amputation is determined to be the most appropriate procedure for an individual, the Syme amputation is generally recommended. In the past, transtibial amputation was more commonly performed because of cosmetic concerns for a bulky ankle. However, in subsequent observations, the ankle did not enlarge with growth, and the Syme amputation allowed for weight bearing on the residual limb. Boyd described a modification to the Syme amputation in which the talus is removed, but the retained calcaneus is fused to the tibia to help prevent posterior migration of the heel pad. In this modification, the heel pad grows with the patient. However, the procedure is associated with more wound problems, nonunion, and malpositioning of the calcaneus. In general, a Syme amputation is recommended.
When a Syme amputation is performed in children, trimming the condyles is not necessary. As opposed to adults, children have small condyles that do not grow to a normal size.
For patients with hip dysplasia, PFFD, and/or coxa vara, please refer to Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip, Proximal Femoral Focal Deficiency, and Congenital Coxa Vara for further details regarding the various procedures.
Several issues should be noted, however. Any necessary operations for acetabular redirection are generally performed before femoral lengthening. Also, in the setting of combined coxa vara and limb-length discrepancy, lengthening via callotasis at the subtrochanteric level is not recommended because of the bending moment and the small cross-sectional area in that portion of the femur. Instead, a more standard valgus intertrochanteric osteotomy should be performed with any necessary lengthening performed separately at the distal femur.
Genu valgum associated with postaxial hypoplasia of the lower extremity is progressive, and it can adversely affect alignment of the lower limb. This can be treated in several ways. Acute correction can be obtained by means of a distal femur corticotomy when femoral lengthening is being performed or by means of an osteotomy when anteromedial tibial bowing is being corrected. In patients with a hypoplastic lateral femoral condyle, temporary medial epiphyseal stapling has been recommended because osteotomy has a high recurrence rate unless it is performed near maturity.
Ankle abnormalities can range from complete absence of the fibula to ankle valgus and/or a ball-and-socket ankle. For the more severe deformities, a Gruca reconstruction has been described. This procedure creates a lateral malleolus by using an oblique sliding osteotomy of the distal tibia. In milder cases of fibular hypoplasia and possible valgus, a supramalleolar osteotomy is traditionally used. As a less-invasive alternative, a medial malleolar screw epiphysiodesis may provide good results, as Stevens described.
Procedures in the foot include resection of talar coalitions or fusions and address any problems with shoe fit that might arise for any deformity. Specific details of these procedures are discussed in other articles. Preoperative details: As mentioned above, the most important part of preoperative planning is thorough evaluation of the entire limb to identify all of the associated abnormalities that may be present as a part of this syndrome. The mechanical and anatomic axes should be determined and corrected when possible. An overall plan is important, and this should be discussed in detail with the patient and his or her family. Postoperative details: Postoperative care depends on the specific procedures performed. Follow-up care: Because the abnormalities associated with postaxial hypoplasia of the lower extremity tend to be relative as opposed to absolute, the patient should continue to be monitored through maturity to ensure that no additional interventions are necessary.
|   |
COMPLICATIONS
| Section 7 of 11  |
|
Postaxial hypoplasia of the lower extremity is a syndrome that involves structures throughout a large anatomic area, and complications of treatment are not infrequent. In addition to the standard surgical complications (eg, infection, bleeding), several other complications specific to this disorder have been described.
In the hip, the Hilgenreiner epiphyseal angle must be corrected to less than 38° from the horizontal, and repeat valgus intertrochanteric osteotomies may be needed. Limb lengthening has a range of complications, from the frequent superficial infections along the pin tract to more significant problems related to fracture, tightening of soft tissues, stiffness, and recurrent deformity.
Stapling is an effective method for correcting angular deformities, but staple displacement and/or rebound growth may occur. However, in some situations, stapling may be preferred to an osteotomy because of the increased morbidity rate and because of the possibility of nonunion and recurrence after an osteotomy procedure.
Finally, a complication of limb-sparing treatment that must be discussed with the parents from the beginning is that the patient may still ultimately require an amputation.
|   |
OUTCOME AND PROGNOSIS
| Section 8 of 11  |
|
Because postaxial hypoplasia of the lower extremity represents such a wide range of abnormalities with varying degrees of involvement, no simple statement can be made regarding the patient's prognosis. Judicious use of well-timed procedures specifically tailored to the individual patient provides the best opportunity to achieve a well-aligned functional limb of adequate length.
|   |
FUTURE AND CONTROVERSIES
| Section 9 of 11  |
|
One controversy regarding this syndrome is its name. Historically, it has been called fibular aplasia or hypoplasia. This name has been defended largely because of historical precedent. However, as more insights have been gained into the constellation of related abnormalities stemming from the embryological limb bud, postaxial hypoplasia of the lower extremity may describe the syndrome more accurately. It also helps remind the clinician to look for other subtle abnormalities and not focus on only the obvious fibular deficiency.
|   |
PICTURES
| Section 10 of 11  |
|
| Caption: Picture 1. Type 1B fibular hemimelia in a 3-year-old boy. The fibula is short relative to the tibia, and the tibia is shorter on the affected side. Note that the tibia is also mildly bowed. Image courtesy of Dennis P. Grogan, MD.
|  | View Full Size Image |
|
Picture Type: X-RAY |
| Caption: Picture 2. Fibular hemimelia in the same patient as in Image 1. By the age of 5 years, the limb-length discrepancy is progressive and significant. Image courtesy of Dennis P. Grogan, MD.
|  | View Full Size Image |
|
Picture Type: X-RAY |
| Caption: Picture 3. Type 2 fibular hemimelia (complete absence) in a 1-year-old girl. Note that the foot is in a significant valgus position. Image courtesy of Dennis P. Grogan, MD.
|  | View Full Size Image |
|
Picture Type: X-RAY |
| Caption: Picture 4. Fibular hemimelia. A ball-and-socket ankle joint is a common finding in patients with fibular hemimelia. In and of itself, this is usually not problematic, but it is commonly associated with limb-length discrepancy and tarsal coalition. Image courtesy of Dennis P. Grogan, MD.
|  | View Full Size Image |
|
Picture Type: X-RAY |
| Caption: Picture 5. Type 2 fibular hemimelia (complete absence) in a 4-month-old girl. Note the skin dimple in the midtibial area and the 2-ray foot. Image courtesy of Dennis P. Grogan, MD.
|  | View Full Size Image |
|
Picture Type: Photo |
| Caption: Picture 6. Fibular hemimelia. The radiographic appearance of the patient in Image 5. The fibula is absent, and the proximal tibial ossification center is absent. Two metatarsals are associated with 3 phalanges, 2 of which are fused to form only 2 toes. Image courtesy of Dennis P. Grogan, MD.
|  | View Full Size Image |
|
Picture Type: X-RAY |
| Caption: Picture 7. Type 1A fibular hemimelia in an 8-year-old boy. Significant valgus hindfoot is due to the shortened fibula. Image courtesy of Dennis P. Grogan, MD.
|  | View Full Size Image |
|
Picture Type: Photo |
| Caption: Picture 8. Type 2 fibular hemimelia and a significant anterior bow to the tibia in a 9-month-old boy. Image courtesy of Dennis P. Grogan, MD.
|  | View Full Size Image |
|
Picture Type: X-RAY |
| Caption: Picture 9. Fibular hemimelia in the same patient as in Image 8. Because the tibial bowing caused prosthetic fitting problems, corrective osteotomy was performed. Image courtesy of Dennis P. Grogan, MD.
|  | View Full Size Image |
|
Picture Type: X-RAY |
| Caption: Picture 10. Type 1B fibular hemimelia in an 8-year-old boy. The limb-length discrepancy is 6 cm. The patient is undergoing tibial lengthening with a unilateral external fixation device. Image courtesy of Dennis P. Grogan, MD.
|  | View Full Size Image |
|
Picture Type: X-RAY |
| Caption: Picture 11. Fibular hemimelia. A 10-year-old girl is undergoing lengthening of her tibia with an Ilizarov device. The device incorporates her foot to maintain the position of the foot during lengthening with a lift. This device can be adjusted as lengthening proceeds and as the discrepancy decreases. Image courtesy of Dennis P. Grogan, MD.
|  | View Full Size Image |
|
Picture Type: Photo |
| Caption: Picture 12. Fibular hemimelia. This specimen was removed at the time of Syme amputation in a patient with fibular hemimelia and significant limb-length discrepancy, prior to prosthetic fitting. Note the separate ossification centers for the talus and calcaneus, but no joint space is evident. Image courtesy of and copyright held by Grogan DP, Holt GR, Ogden JA. Talocalcaneal coalition in patients who have fibular hemimelia or proximal femoral focal deficiency: a comparison of the radiographic and pathological findings. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994;Sep 76(9):1363-70.
|  | View Full Size Image |
|
Picture Type: X-RAY |
| Caption: Picture 13. Fibular hemimelia. Clinical photograph of the specimen shown in Image 12. Note that the ossification centers are actually part of 1 solid cartilaginous anlage. The 2 separate ossification centers fuse during adolescence, and only then is the tarsal coalition radiographically evident. Image courtesy of and copyright held by Grogan DP, Holt GR, Ogden JA. Talocalcaneal coalition in patients who have fibular hemimelia or proximal femoral focal deficiency: a comparison of the radiographic and pathological findings. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994;Sep 76(9):1363-70.
|  | View Full Size Image |
|
Picture Type: Photo |
|   |
BIBLIOGRAPHY
| Section 11 of 11 |
|
-
Achterman C, Kalamchi A: Congenital deficiency of the fibula. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1979 May; 61-B(2): 133-7[Medline].
-
Birch JG, Walsh SJ, Small JM, et al: Syme amputation for the treatment of fibular deficiency. An evaluation of long-term physical and psychological functional status. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999 Nov; 81(11): 1511-8[Medline].
-
Birch JG, Lincoln TL, Mack PW: Functional classification of fibular deficiency. In: Herring JA, Birch JG, eds. The Child with a Limb Deficiency. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1998: 161.
-
Boakes JL, Stevens PM, Moseley RF: Treatment of genu valgus deformity in congenital absence of the fibula. J Pediatr Orthop 1991 Nov-Dec; 11(6): 721-4[Medline].
-
Bohne WH, Root L: Hypoplasia of the fibula. Clin Orthop 1977 Jun; (125): 107-12[Medline].
-
Boyd HB: Amputation of the foot with calcaneotibial arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1939; 21: 997.
-
Carroll K, Coleman S, Stevens PM: Coxa vara: surgical outcomes of valgus osteotomies. J Pediatr Orthop 1997 Mar-Apr; 17(2): 220-4[Medline].
-
Choi IH, Kumar SJ, Bowen JR: Amputation or limb-lengthening for partial or total absence of the fibula. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990 Oct; 72(9): 1391-9[Medline].
-
Coventry M, Johnson E: Congenital absence of the fibula. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1952; 34: 941-55.
-
Eilert RE, Jayakumar SS: Boyd and Syme ankle amputations in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976 Dec; 58(8): 1138-41[Medline].
-
Grogan DP, Holt GR, Ogden JA: Talocalcaneal coalition in patients who have fibular hemimelia or proximal femoral focal deficiency. A comparison of the radiographic and pathological findings. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994 Sep; 76(9): 1363-70[Medline].
-
Herring JA: Symes amputation for fibular hemimelia: a second look in the Ilizarov era. Instr Course Lect 1992; 41: 435-6[Medline].
-
Herring JA, Barnhill B, Gaffney C: Syme amputation. An evaluation of the physical and psychological function in young patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986 Apr; 68(4): 573-8[Medline].
-
Hootnick D, Boyd NA, Fixsen JA, Lloyd-Roberts GC: The natural history and management of congenital short tibia with dysplasia or absence of the fibula. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1977 Aug; 59(3): 267-71[Medline].
-
Lewin SO, Opitz JM: Fibular a/hypoplasia: review and documentation of the fibular developmental field. Am J Med Genet Suppl 1986; 2: 215-38[Medline].
-
Morrissy RT, Giavedoni BJ, Coultery-O'Berry C: The limb-deficient child. In: Pediatric Orthopedics. 5th ed. 2001: 1227-33.
-
Pappas AM, Hanawalt BJ, Anderson M: Congenital defects of the fibula. Orthop Clin North Am 1972 Mar; 3(1): 187-99[Medline].
-
Stanitski DF, Stanitski CL: Fibular Hemimelia: A new classification system. J Pediatr Orthop 2003; 23: 30-34.
-
Stevens PM, Arms D: Postaxial hypoplasia of the lower extremity. J Pediatr Orthop 2000 Mar-Apr; 20(2): 166-72[Medline].
-
Stevens PM, Belle RM: Screw epiphysiodesis for ankle valgus. J Pediatr Orthop 1997 Jan-Feb; 17(1): 9-12[Medline].
-
Thomas IH, Williams PF: The Gruca operation for congenital absence of the fibula. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1987 Aug; 69(4): 587-92[Medline].
-
Wiltse LL: Valgus deformity of the ankle: a sequel to acquired or congenital abnormalities of the fibula. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1972 Apr; 54(3): 595-606[Medline].
Fibular Hemimelia excerpt |